chrysler

Sunday, 5th of July 2009

Polls

Other than a large discount, which incentive would most encourage you to buy a new car?

View Results

Used Car Supermarket Car Leasing

Search

chrysler PT Cruiser Road Test Reports and Car Reviews

chrysler PT Cruiser

PT Cruiser is designed to be extremely versatile. The PT Cruiser’s tall profile contributes to its command-of-the-road seating and flexible interior space. The prefix ‘PT’ stands for ‘personal transportation’, which reflects PT Cruiser’s flexibility and versatility for each individual owner.

chrysler PT Cruiser reviews by year of make:   2000  2001  2002  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  Read all reviews

Submit your own review

Lease Buy

* Required

What Do You Say...?

chrysler PT Cruiser Car Reviews

Pamela Chambers, Bedfordshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2001

4 star review

I bought my PT Cruiser second hand in January 2007 and I love it! I’ve had no problems whatsoever and in winter it starts first time in temperatures of zero and below. Its so roomy - great for moving house. You get used to the wide turning circle and the fuel consumption is about 30-33mph, {just don’t go into fifth gear and slow down if you worry about petrol consumption}. I love the roominess inside and the space in the boot, if I take the back seats out, then I have a van. I hope this car lasts forever!

Submitted: 29/06/2009 15:55:27

Have your say

Lee Parker, Nottinghamshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.4 auto 2006

1 star review

I wanted one of these the first time I saw one, I have always gone for the quirky type of cars for the last 45 years. I can’t fault the looks and the equipment you get, but I’m afraid it all does pear shaped from there. The poor turning circle has got me in one or two scrapes - the head gasket leaked from new, the engine is like a 2.4 from the early Volvo’s and sadly out of date. I have regretted leasing it because of the 20 mpg ( on a good day ) and would definitely never get another.

Submitted: 13/05/2009 11:11:56

Have your say

Chris Drucker, Middlesex

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.0 Limited manual 2001

5 star review

Always wanted this car as I think all modern cars have boring styling. Needless to say I like classic cars! I bought my car in 2003 and have had no problems with it breaking down etc but as it is 8 years old it was time for a new cam belt and while this was being done the water pump and power steering pipe were found to have seepage marks so I replaced these as well. I had noticed this year that when indicating right sometimes the fog lights would activate for the duration the indicator was on and knew that was a faulty multifunction indicator switch which costs about £70 plus labour so got this done as well. Was surprised at some of the comments about the car being slow, the name PT Cruiser points to its intended use, so yup, its no fireball but I have no problems as I am in no great hurry.... I get 40 mpg on an all motorway cruise down to my mums and reasonable (for the design age of the engine) fuel return about town where I am in no hurry to catch up with the next traffic jam. That said, the 2.4 litre or diesel are a lot better for midrange but were out of my pocket’s reach in 2003. The Auto box should be avoided as that is a very old design and thus inefficient on fuel. Never had a problem with the turning circle as I am that cheeky sod who uses your drive way to about turn!! Here is to many happy cruising years to come.

Submitted: 14/04/2009 11:54:57

Have your say

Jon Lilley, Norfolk

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005

4 star review

We love the car but hate the turning. Would we buy another one? Yes, if we could. They don’t make them any more - bring back the PT Limited!

Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:33:38

Have your say

AD Lyon, England

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002

1 star review

Mine has been without a doubt the worst car I have ever owned. After 1 month the slave cylinder in the clutch failed - not a major problem you might say but it was because it is fitted inside the gearbox!! Two weeks later the fuel pump failed costing over £900 to replace. After getting the car back the new fuel pump leaked and within two hours the car was back in the garage again. Got it back two weeks later... another fuel leak developed had to be recovered by RAC. Agree with other comments it has the turning circle of a battleship - maybe not such an issue in America but on our roads renders the car awkward to drive. It’s a shame because despite the above I love the look of the car, the comfort etc, but for an everyday vehicle it is just not a viable option unless you have a spare car and very deep pockets.

Submitted: 16/01/2009 14:32:29

Have your say

Barrie, Hampshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2007

4 star review

I went to Texas for 6 weeks and hired a PT Cruiser, I was hoping for a Focus or similar, I hated the Cruisers styling, but after driving it I was impressed by the comfort and equipment, loads of room and nice to drive, nothing went wrong and the economy was good, performance ok, smooth auto, doors and boot that close well without slamming, I have since sold my Toyota Corolla, uncomfortable, bad handling, poor auto, silly niggling faults, the PT cruiser is much nicer, but I bought a 3 series BMW, everything about it is better than Toyota, looks beat the Cruiser.

Submitted: 20/10/2008 10:22:14

Have your say

Albert Marshall, Hampshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.0 manual 2002

4 star review

Purchased my "Silver Pearlescent with colour coded bumpers!" five weeks ago. So far, for the price I paid, I have no real issues; although I do agree the turning circle is pretty poor. However, comfort, space and style make up for its short- comings. Mine is a 2002 2.0 manual, any hints on deceleration when changing gear?

Submitted: 10/10/2008 09:51:55

Have your say

Mr Robinson, Lancashire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.0 ltd edition auto 2000

4 star review

It feels like a million dollars, and costs roughly that much to get it from our house to Tesco and back. I was persuaded to buy my black "batmobile" by my 9 year old son who couldn’t settle to bed all night after we’d been for a test drive in it a couple of weeks ago, so thrilling he found it..... OK, I didn’t do much research, and the ZZ Top thing grabbed me, as did the relative obscurity and undeniable surfeit of creature comforts offered within... will I still have it in 6 months time? Not sure, but I’ll certainly still be talking about it, and it makes a change to see a car that actually looks like a proper car, not just another conservative "family" jelly mould with broadly predictable kit, mpg etc... 25 miles to the gallon? That’s why god gave us credit cards. Enjoy!!!!!!!!!!

Submitted: 13/08/2008 10:55:28

Have your say

Mike Atkinson, Durham

Chrysler PT Cruiser Classic CRD 2004

3 star review

I wanted one of these car for quite some time, I eventually got one second hand and apart from the very poor turning circle I thought the car was excellent, plenty of power and quite good on fuel for the size of the engine. But then it all turned very bad, one day I was driving along and the engine just cut out, fortunately I was only doing 25mph on a side road - god knows what would have happened if I had been overtaking on the motor way. I got the car taken to a Chrysler Dealer who found the ASD fuse had blown and when it was replace it just started no problems, the big problem is no one, not even Chrysler UK can tell me why the fuse blow and they could give no guarantee that it would not happen again. As you may has guessed I am getting rid of it since it is a potential death trap.

Submitted: 25/07/2008 11:36:38

Have your say

Daug Martin, Cornwall

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2007

3 star review

Overall not a bad car except for the bad turning ratio, being hard on fuel and faulty gauges. The speedometer was off by 5 kilometres.

Submitted: 11/07/2008 11:50:33

Have your say

Robert Dunne, Devon

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.4 gt 2005

5 star review

I love this motor a blast, from the past with all mod cons. Depreciation is bad, I mean really bad. So why play the game? I am keeping it and going to lpg (liquid petroleum gas). I reckon this is a 200,000 mile car. I love it to death!

Submitted: 16/06/2008 09:43:38

Have your say

Bill, Norfolk

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.0 ltd auto 2002

4 star review

Great car. Bit like marmite, you either love it or hate it. Plenty of room in the back (for three adults) as well as the front. Owned ours for 3 years without much problem. Spares prices variable. Turning circle awful. Fuel consumption awful. Looks priceless!

Submitted: 14/04/2008 10:44:37

Have your say

Tom Cooke, Staffordshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2.2 CRD Limited 2008

5 star review

To follow up on my last comments; I was in the dealership today to look at their just-arrived 2008 UK-model CRD 2.2 Limited PT Cruiser. I spent at least half an hour going over the vehicle and jotting down the detailed features, so here goes; 17 inch alloys Fuel filler cover is no longer chrome Bodyside mouldings are still chrome Chrome strips on the front grille Chromed exhaust tip Changed rear lettering; "PT Cruiser" on lower left, "Chrysler" above the wings centre; "CRD Limited" on lower right (think the lettering is smaller, still the same characteristic font of course) Door sill plates are black plastic, but with large rectangular brushed metal insert with large bright Chrysler wings logo The seats are now virtually full leather (just a small strip of cloth at the sides of the base) Steering wheel has silver spokes The centre console has a ’hatched’ pattern (dealer called it ’carbon look-alike’) Best I can tell, all the mechanicals are exactly as before.

Submitted: 03/03/2008 11:28:23

Have your say

Tom Cooke, Staffordshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser CRD 2.2 Limited 2008

5 star review

Bit bothered about Pete Swann’s comments; my dealer simply can’t tell me what will be missing (versus the brochure) from my vehicle when it arrives in two or three weeks. Pretty poor - I’ve seen a few comments on forums that suggest that *no* Chrysler dealers have got up-to-date marketing material and vehicle specs for the 2008 model year PT, Chrysler are concentrating on pushing their ’premium’ vehicles. But I’m going to assume that apart from a few cosmetic things, the car will be substantially as the brochure and Chrysler’s US website describes (otherwise the dealer will find himself with a ’situation’ on his hands). I still think I’m going to enjoy the car immensely, given the style and overall equipment level. As long as I get reliability and good service and warranty work from the dealer, I’ll have made a good decision.

Submitted: 25/02/2008 11:12:33

Have your say

Tony N, Kent

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2001

2 star review

Slow, sluggish. That’s just to start. The gearbox is mounted slightly of centre so 1st gear would be where reverse is and second is where first would be. It is noisy and it sounds like you have to over rev to pull away. It has a large turning circle. It is also not good on fuel, around 25-30 mpg. The acceleration is about 0-60 in 1hour. My great Nan could push a full shopping trolley up hill in flippers faster. This is a well over priced car.

Submitted: 25/02/2008 09:57:23

Have your say

Pete Swann, Kent

Chrysler PT Cruiser 2008

4 star review

Have purchased the 2008 pt cruiser "Limited" Auto. Disappointed in the lack of promised refinements for this model. No chrome filler cap. No chrome wheels. Running boards are now rubber inserts. Just a new centre stack facia which is quite impressive. Why pay for this model when all the outside refinements are gone?

Submitted: 16/01/2008 12:13:31

Have your say

Andrew Briggs, Yorkshire

Chrysler PT Cruiser Ltd 2004

4 star review

Very practical car with cruise control , leather , air con .I’ drive automatics and the original 2ltd pt cruiser was underpowered .The 2.4 ltr suits it exactly and makes for a relaxed drive . the only drawback is the appalling turning circle . I’ve also gone and leased the convertible (dont fancy the depreciation) and thats very comfortable and refined for drop top.

Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:06:12

Have your say

Norman Robson, Lancashire

Chrysler PT Cruiser 1.6tdi

5 star review

Great car, loads of space, economical and in my opinion, looks the business. I would recommend this car to anyone.

Submitted: 24/08/2007 17:02:20

Have your say

How does it compare?

Ford Focus

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 40 reviews )

Nissan Qashqai

4.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 23 reviews )


Volkswagen Golf

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 21 reviews )

Chrysler PT Cruiser

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 18 reviews )


Fiat Punto

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 18 reviews )

BMW 1-Series

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 17 reviews )


Honda Civic

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 17 reviews )

Citroen C4

2.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 16 reviews )


Renault Megane Hatch

3 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 14 reviews )

Alfa Romeo 147

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 11 reviews )


chrysler Road Tests

Small Family Cars - Comparison Road Tests

Lease prices