Volvo road test reports and car reviews

Volvo S40 2.4i 2006

Originally I wanted the S40 T5, but was put off by the price and the possibility that it had been hammered a bit. I took a used 2.4i for a test drive and was immediately sold; the engine note alone did it for me, that awesome 5 cylinder "warble" puts a smile on my face every time. Add in the full house generous spec levels, awesome interior and exterior design and brilliant open road cruising ability, and it makes for a perfect vehicle. Also, the ability to put the occasional hot hatch to shame at traffic lights is not a bad thing! :)

Volvo XC90 D5 SE 2004

Well, I understand people’s frustration with low mpg figures but, honestly, what do you expect? It’s a big heavy car and takes a lot of shifting. It’s my wife’s main mode of transport, and she does around 20,000 miles per year with lots of stop/start, shortish journeys. She is lucky to get over 20mpg using it for work as she does. Having said that, we do really get up to 35mpg on a long run (and I do mean long; visiting our friends in South West Ireland from Northumberland is pretty long), if only we could get that sort of mileage all the time. We’ve had the car since new, and have done 140,000+ miles in it. The interior has worn very well with only the shininess of the drivers seat giving any indication of the car’s age. Even the DVD player hasn’t given any bother and has proved a boon keeping the kids quiet on the longer journeys. (15 hours straight the 1st time we visited Bantry! We’ve learned our lesson and now split the journey in Dublin!) Repairs are becoming a little more frequent now; the only one to give real concern being some ’plug’ in the engine giving way, allowing the engine oil to deposit itself over the garage floor. The plug was a simple plastic component (it’s replacement is steel) and costs a tenner. Fitting it cost £600 in labour!! We are keeping the car, as the only thing we can think of that is as practical as this is another XC90. We have considered both the Audi Q7 and the Disco. The Q7 isn’t big enough inside to take all of our holiday gear, and being prior Land Rover owners, we will never have another, as they are too unreliable with service to match! However, we now find it difficult to justify the high running (low mpg) costs to carry on using the XC90 as our day to day workhorse (it does the job admirably, it’s just too costly) and so have just bought a 2.0D Volvo V50 for my wife to use as a daily vehicle. (Excellent service from Mill Volvo Hexham has kept us very happily Volvo customers.) In summary: The XC90 equals superb, comfortable, family transport that has coped with the very worst of Northumberland winters with aplomb (if you’re struggling in snow, you have the wrong tyres on, the standard fit Conti’s are poor, try Pirelli Scorpion Ice & Snow). Our favourite sturdy workhorse. However, these days it’s becoming expensive at the pumps, and that’s why it loses a star, but everything else is darn near perfect as a family vehicle.

Responses to this review

I’m not quite sure where people are getting this "Q7 small on the inside" from. This is taken from Auto Express about the XC90. "This is great news for storage, although with the third row of seats folded away, its 615-litre boot can’t quite match the 626 litres offered by the shorter Honda. Using all seven seats eats into the luggage space, with only 249 litres behind them. Drop them all, and the XC90’s enormous dimensions pay dividends, with a van-like boot space of 1,837 litres - the biggest here." So the Volvo has 1837 litres with all seats down, 615 with five seats and 249 with all seats being used. This is what they have to say about the Q7 "Longer and wider than either the XC90 or M-Class, the Audi also has the largest wheelbase. As a result, interior room is impressive, and seven seats are fitted as standard. The middle row of chairs offers good head and legroom, while the rear pair flip up out of the boot floor with ease. Access to them through the side doors and past the middle bench is a squeeze, but there is adequate room for two adults, and they are perfect for children. In five-seat mode, the 775-litre boot capacity is bigger than its main rivals’, while with seven chairs in place the 330-litre volume is 81 litres larger than in the XC90." Also "Both the easy-folding second and third-row seating can fold flat expanding the luggage capacity to an enormous 2,035 litres." So that is 2,035 litres with all seats down, 775 with five seats and 330 with all seats being used. So luggage capacity is much greater than the XC90 in every seating configuration - Graeme from Buckinghamshire

I couldn’t agree more, the XC90 is a superb car. I have the D5 185 remapped with RICA Stage 2, now has 240bhp and averages 40mpg on a long run and around town 32mpg, before the remap I was getting around 33mpg and 27mpg respectively. It’s more economical now and can out run a X5 at the lights too - Jim Cookson from England

Volvo S80 D5 Auto SE 2005

 

I bought this in Feb 2011 with 55k on the clock. I drive approx 1000K per week and I’ve never had one problem. I service it at regular intervals; light bulbs go quickly, but this is common with all Volvo’s. This is my 8th Volvo, but my 1st S80. It has just clocked 100k so I looked around to change it, but there’s no point as this runs so well. Comfortable with good equipment and a fanatastic stereo.

 

Volvo S40 t4 2002

I Had a volvo S40 T4. It needed 6 head gasgets on one engine and two further head gasgets on a new engine. The biggest bunch of rubbish ever. Never, ever again!!!!

Volvo S80 d5 se lux 2007

My s80 now has 102 thousand miles on it and so far it has proved its reliability. I bought it with 38 thousand miles on the clock, but the car has never let me down apart from on one occasion when the dpf showed up. My advice is to make sure you get rid of the dpf if you buy one as it will be the only reason to put you off a Volvo. This is not a big deal and the car will have more power and do 10 per cent more mileage on every gallon. There are plenty of companies out there who can do this for you; I paid £550 and I am happy with the outcome. My car is a lot smoother and now has better ecconomy, averaging around 40-42mpg.

Volvo XC70 D5 Automatic SE 2011

 

I’ve only had this car for a few weeks, but so far I’ve no regrets. The fuel consumption is surprisingly good for such a heavy auto, 37- 41 mpg is no problem on everyday driving around rural roads. The performance is effortless and overall the car is quiet and relaxed. I do not understand other reviewers fury at road noise? I have not noticed, as yet, any problem on a wide variety of smooth and iffy road surfaces here in Suffolk. My only criticism to date is the slightly vague steering, but if you want precision etc., get a BMW, although I don’t fancy one of those in snow and ice. I am enjoying the XC70 for its attributes and I hope to have it for considerable time.

 

Volvo C30 2.0 petrol R design 2011

This is the fifth time I’ve done a review, the first three about my V50 the fourth about my C30. I bought this car new and I said when I’d had the car a few weeks I would do an indepth review, so here it is: 1) the car is a looker. 2) The 2L petrol engine is ok (1.6 I guess will be under powered), but not as good as my old 2L diesel especially at lower speeds (under 40, 45 mph), however, once it’s wound up it’s fast enough. I took it for its first motorway cruse this weekend where it managed 75/80 no problem and it still had plenty left. 3) A lot quieter than the V50 diesel. 4) The equipment level is ok, but I miss my 6th gear and reversing sensors. 5) The economy is not bad, I’m getting about 35 mpg compared to 45mpg with the diesel (I am quite heavy with my right foot), but I knew that when I bought it. With the extra cost of the diesel engine and the fuel at the pumps, I worked out it would take me 10 to 12 years to break even. 6) Interior space is no problem as there is just the good lady and me and the back is fine, but it’s definitely a 4 seater. 7) The car holds the road like ’you-know-what’ to a blanket 8). The only niggle is the steering lock, it’s appalling, you need a football pitch to turn round. All in all if there is just you and your partner and you want a car that’s fun, then treat yourself, but get at least a 2L.

Volvo XC90 SE 2005

Well it has just cost me over £2000 to get it through its service; £1400 for new Angle Gear (4WD), £300 for new pads and discs, £120 for new fluids and the rest for the cost of the service. Oh and £35.00 for a new set of wipers. The car has done 75000 miles and the past 15000 has been made up with light driving; school runs and small journeys. The only long distance journey is up to Nottingham and back. The mpg is about 28mpg if you are lucky and you get just about 280miles out of a full tank and at the current rate about £80.00 every other week! Apart from this it is a very good car. I knew these costs would be coming so we have allowed for it and it’s good too know it’s now all been done. Yes it is a lot of money, but the bottom line is what other car can give you 4WD and a 7 seater? A Q7 and a LR4, the runing costs of which would be the same or more. Plus the LR4 is too boxey and the Q7 is just too much money for a similar mileage XC90. I have read the rest of the reviews and it is chalk and cheese. Some rave, some hate. Me I am in the middle. However for the price, spec and reliability I am very happy with our purchase. I am currently looking into purchasing a MY07/08 in the near future.

Volvo XC90 D5 SE 2004

A fantastic car, which has never let me down. I have had no mechanical issues with the car, with the milage at a tad over 50,000 miles now. I am just awaiting delivery of a 2012MY XC90 Executive, which I’m sure will prove to be just as reliable and great to drive as my 2004MY XC90. Previously I owned three Land Rover Discovery’s (200Tdi, 300Tdi & TD5) all of which were nightmares when it came down to reliability. I have had seven years of relaxed trouble free motoring in my XC90. All I have ever had to do is replace the tyres at 25,000 miles.

Responses to this review

Ohh you funny f*cker. Enjoy your soon-to-be-dated XC90 shed - Graeme from Buckinghamshire

Volvo S60 D3 R-Type 2011

It was a big decision to trade out of the "normal" German fare when the company car was due for replacement. The old prejudices levied against "an old man’s brand" were overcome with a fantastic value for money package, a great driving experience and a BMW built over a month of Friday afternoons so bad was it’s reliability. Another coil pack anyone? But bluntly, I love this car. Spacious, well equipped, comfortable, cruises imperiously and damned good looking to boot! Demolishes motorway miles effortlessly and delivers 40mpg even when worked hard. A couple of minor electrical glitches in 17k miles haven’t spoiled the experience. Yes, the quality of the interior plastics isn’t up to the Audi-BMW but it’s all screwed together well and delivers impressive ambience especially at night with the blue tinged lighting. After the "disappointing" BMW last time out, the S60 has breezed in like a breath of fresh air. Go on, try it, you won’t be disappointed!

Volvo V70 2.5d auto 1999

I’ve had this car from 2007, before hand I also used it as a pool car. I’m only 28 and needed to buy a good estate car for work. I’ve put around 150,00 mile on it myself and in one year put 80,000 of that mileage on it, the car in total has now done 250,000 miles. Its the 2.5d auto (mid trim level). Its been driven in the floods in Gloucestershire and the white out over the last two years, as well as up and down the UK and it’s never missed a beat. It’s helped me move house 3 times and I’ve done up two houses with it. I’ve used it for work (carrying productions team around the uk with equipment) and slept in it at festivels too. It still does 45mpg. I’ve had to replace one or two parts on it over the years and I think the air cons is on its way out....I can live with that though. If you drive it hard it eats front tyers and I have randomly had to change the head lights on it (but I think that’s a common fault). I found this site by chance as I’m actually look for a way to clean the turbo on it and I just wanted to say it’s an amazing car and would recommend it to anyone! One thing I would say is that I do change the oil in it every 5,000 miles as this help not just with the general running of it, but really helps with the life of the turbo, but that is a bit of a given. I’m at a point where I don’t really need a car like this any more and would like to buy an A3, but I just can’t get rid of it, not only because it’s still a good car, but it’s really grown on me (and my partner). It’s a really good car and I would recommend it to anyone.

Volvo C30 2.0 petrol R design 2011

This is the fourth time I’ve submitted a revue, the first three being about my 2008 V50 2D s.e Sport R Design which I found amazing. I have now part ex’d it for a new C30 2.0 petrol R Design. The short time I drove the car home from the dealers (about 30 miles) it seemed a little sluggish compared to the diesel, but i’ll put that down to newness. When I’ve had the car a few weeks i’ll put together a more in-depth review. (I’ve given it 5 stars at this point just for looks.)

Volvo S60 R 2005

I have owned this car for almost 4 years. It has a dreadful turning circle, ridiculously low front spoiler and the tyres rub the inner guards when going around a roundabout. Apart from this the car is brilliant fun and I can’t wipe the smile from my face when I give it a push. It has so much torque it is not funny. You don’t need the stereo on if you are revving over 4000 rpm. I have no idea what to replace it with when the lease expires? Maybe an AMG Merc or quick Audi?

Volvo V50 1.6D S 2008

A superb car, which has so far given 33,000 trouble-free miles. As a compact estate the V50 is really quite roomy though there’s a distinct lack of cubby space for nick-nacks. A joy to drive once I fitted it with Uniroyal Rainsport 2’s. It goes where you point it and with very little lean in corners. I’m averaging 56 mpg over a tank of fuel on a mix of motorway, A and B roads and when I compare it to my previous car (Smart Forfour 1.5TDi Passion) which averaged 49mpg, I am well please with the Volvo. I had 4.5yrs of trouble-free motoring with the Smart and it looks as if the V50 is heading the same way. Like the Smart, the V50 is none-too-common on our streets and it often draws admiring looks and comments. People who complain about the size or flexibility of this car ought to have noticed this when they test-drove it so it seems odd that they now find it too small for their needs. Personally, I carry passengers occasionally, but mostly it’s just me and my labrador and the car is easily big enough. I like the level of kit that comes on this ’basic’ car though I may opt for cruise-control next time. But I knew it didn’t have this when I bought it and the car is definitely fun to drive and has excellent fuel economy. I love it!

Responses to this review

V50 2.0 diesel: not overly impressed with the car after a month of ownership. Traded in a 318i and the quality of the fittings and fixtures was much better in the BMW. Likewise the handling, road-holding and general noise suppression was better in the BMW. I accept that the V50 is a Focus in a party dress and having had a Focus before I was happy to see the Volvo in that light. Diesel engine has great grunt and easily spins the wheels pulling out of junctions and in wet conditions. The heated leather memory seats are fantastic and so is the high performance sound system; my daughter hates the Stone Roses at full belt. First week had the car running up to Belfast perfectly and later was filled with child fallout (old toys) for a run to the tip. All has gone well with the car but I am not sure I will buy another V50, a 520i touring will have to be first choice - Jim Beale from Ireland

Volvo XC90 2010

Ok, I don’t actually own this car. My car is an Audi Q7 3.0. Unfortunately my neighbour decided to reverse into it last week and his insurance company have provided me with an XC90 whilst mine is being repaired. The Volvo had been on my shortlist before getting the Q7. After a few days I am happy to say that I made the right decision on leaving it on the shortlist. The engine is woeful. The noise on a cold start up is akin to builder’s transit van. I don’t have the heart to accelerate, as the poor thing just doesn’t like that. Best just let nature take its course and use the rotation of the planet and continental drift if you want to get it moving. I can’t really comment on the fuel economy, but so far it is under 30 mpg. As for handling, I’m pretty sure that the steering wheel does have some vague connection with the wheels, but that they had a tiff a while ago and now only communicate with each other via email. I will say this though, it is comfortable, it irons bumps and potholes quite well. I’m not a fan of the cockpit. Again, the Q7 has spoiled me in this regard. Nothing in the Volvo is intuitive. I tried to flash a driver yesterday but ended up blinding him instead as I had put the car on full beam and didn’t know how to get it off again. The centre console is a confusing array of buttons (too many!). The plastics and fascias feel cheap. In short, I really want my Q7 back. The Volvo is not a "comparible car" in any way, shape or form.

Responses to this review

"I don’t actually own this car"; what a great start to your review! The Q7 is the fastest depreciating car in its class. It’s thirsty and expensive to insure. This, along with being small inside, make it a car to avoid - Simon Greycat from England

If I was stupid enough to buy a Q7 from new then I would agree with you about the depreciation. As for insurance, I have just renewed my insurance for a cost of £390 (6y ncb). I average 30mpg on my work commute - not great but not too bad. As for being small inside? Ok... BTW, I am not the person who responded to your review. Just thought I’d make that clear before a full scale war between Volvo and Audi drivers erupted - Graeme from Buckinghamshire

Another response to Simon Greycat. Apparently your Exclusive XC90 is in a higher insurance group than a Q7 3.0 S Line (42 as opposed to 40), it also only retains 41% of its value after 3 years compared to 46% for the Audi. It is also smaller inside, slower, less powerful, thirstier and pumps out more CO2 (215g/km v 195g/km). So again, I’m left wondering where you get your information from when you commented on my review of the Volvo. Also, judging by the reviews of other Volvo owners, their experience appears to be "avoid" and "will not buy again" - Graeme from Buckinghamshire

Volvo V70 D5 SE Premium 2009

Great car to drive if I can deal with the error messages that appear and oil level indicator that tells lies. I have had the car three weeks and have had to take it back 3 times. The garage still are unable to trace the problem. I may well down grade my rating if the problems continue.

Volvo XC90 R design 2011

I’m really very worried that we have made a huge mistake buying an XC90. We got what we thought to be a great deal and a nearly new car, and we loved it to start with, but then noticed just how low the mpg is. On a rim to rim fill the car is averaging 24mpg!! the computer shows 28mpg so I don’t believe those in car computers. I took it to a dealer last week to see about trading in or selling and buying something more economical and was offered £8,500 less than I paid 2 months earlier. Thinking this was just a dealer trying to rip me off I went to a friend in the trade who looked it up on a national traders website and it showed that was the going rate. He also showed me 2010 models for sale at £19750 trade that are priced at £29000 on the forecourt. Do yourself a favour and buy something else, diesel is set to rise again in January so wipe another couple of thousand off the cars value. I can not believe that I fell for the sales and image trap, which is short lived when you realise what a mistake you have made.

Responses to this review

Fully agree with you, my wife went for the same car and then had a heart attack when trading in for something more sensible. We lost over 12K in two years but like other XC90 owners, you learn the hard way - Jim Wiltshire from Surrey

Volvo XC90 2006

A lovely comfortable vehicle that I love driving, but they need maintaining and have some technical quirks that require either an expensive main dealer or an independent volvo specialist to deal with these issues, such as airbag errors and the annoying service light, which seems to be deliberately timed by Volvo to come on AFTER we have had it serviced! Aside from that, ours has covered a vast amount of mileage (242,000) so we feel sure we are approaching the world record! To sum up: Great drive, super tow vehicle, and very compfortable. Reliable providing they are serviced and maintained and someone is on hand with specialised Volvo kit to diagnose any light and beeps!

Volvo XC90 r design premium 2010

First of all I would like to comment on the fuel consumpsion it started at 27 mpg, but now it’s got 14000 miles on it and it’s doing 32 mpg and still going up; by the way I’ve been running it in properly. I carp fish and went to France last year the XC90 made it a breeze, it cruised effortlessly on the motorway and when we got there it took us around the lake with no problem. The track around the lake was like an off road coarse by the way. In short this car is awsome! It’s my second XC90, but the first I bought from new and above all it’s one of, if not the safest car, to transport your family around and let’s face it the most important thing about a car is the people in it. Enough Said.

Responses to this review

Wait until you try and get rid of it. Big shock - Tom Raynor from Oxfordshire

All cars are pretty safe now but Volvo built up their safety image before others. I don’t think buying an XC90 would make you a better or more caring parent, that is what Volvo want you to buy into. The XC90 is an outdated car and the one benefit doesn’t outweigh all the bad points. Best leave well alone, even the school run mums are starting to ditch them! - Brian from Rutland

Hi Mark, I have a 2011 XC90 R Design Premium as well and all is running well and as expected apart from one major thing. After about a couple of months, the suspension seems to change character from being fairly compliant and quiet to hard, noisy and crashy over mildly uneven surfaces. Have you experienced any suspension issues? Thanks - Jake Edwards from England

Volvo XC90 SE 2010

This car was without doubt the biggest waste of money I have ever made. As with all cars, when you buy them the dealer tells you of high second-hand values and what colours are best. When you come to sell you quickly discover it’s the wrong colour and there is low demand for that model. This is the same for all cars, but to add insult the XC90’s poor mpg hits it even harder. You will struggle to average 28mpg and most of the time 25mpg is more realistic. I can see why people buy an XC90 as we did, but you will soon regret it and will want to deck the car dealer when you try to sell it. Don’t believe the second-hand prices you see advertised, they are way out.

Volvo XC70 SE 2007

This vehicle is the best car I have ever owned. A pleasure to drive. Packed with features. Solid, well build and confidence inspiring plus when you need it to go, it is exhilarating. The wagon is cleverly designed with plenty of room. My kids love the booster seats. Volvo are clever people!

Volvo XC90 R-design auto 2011

Like other owners I have found this car just too expensive to run. Volvo service costs are a joke and the mid 20’s mpg is just daft at £6.00 a gallon. There are lots of other cars out there that perform just as well and when this car is updated or fazed out then the depreciation will really hit. Buy one if you want but just see how much it will really cost you each year, you will be gutted especially when you try to sell it. Don’t believe the secondhand prices you see, they never sell for that amount, dealers try to keep them falsely high. This car is an old designed car and was probably great 10 years ago. RIP

Volvo XC90 R design 2010

At first we thought it was a great car, better than all the German rivals and really nice to drive. A couple of months down the line and I realised just how expensive it was to run and we are not exactly living on the bread line with a household income of 6 figures. Don’t believe anyone who says they get 35+ mpg, I only ever managed a true 26mpg driving very carefully even worse if you want to keep up with motorway traffic. The other big shock is the cost of Volvo servicing. Have now got shot of it and will never again buy an XC90. Mums love them for the school run and to get one up on the other mums, but unless you love supporting BP buy something else.

Volvo C30 2.0D LUX 2008

 

I loved my C30 from the moment I sat in it. Firm on the road. Clean uncluttered cockpit, with everything to hand and an enthusiastic engine, always there with that extra power when needed. It is the first car where I got out after long journeys and felt good, no aches or pains. A pleasure to drive. There are a few niggles of course: The boot is a pigs ear. When there is a load on the steering and the turbo kicks in then the car veers, a bit unnerving but not driven hard enough to see whether it gets dangerous. Also when your foot is off the accelerator the car can drift on as if in cruise, disturbing when it catches you unaware. I bought Volvo for its reputation and everything seems to support that decision. So much thought in its design, with everything clearly labelled or iconed. Everything seemed solid and well specced. So why only 2 stars? At 37,000 had a dmf (dual mass flywheel) failure., which was not a result of my driving. This is a design or manufacturing failure. This is not a maintenance item and should not happen in such a young car with so little mileage. Suddenly reliability and sound engineering looks very hollow. The garage says it is 1 in a 1000 chance, it is a lottery. Everytime you take to the road your could be about to experience a very expensive repair bill. Wham, £1500 to find. No driver fault just a silver bullet waiting to fire. Look elsewhere if you want reliability, but if you want a fun drive and enjoy Russian roulette then go ahead.

 

Volvo XC70 3.2 Le 2008

I think that the XC70 is a great car for families.

Volvo S80 2.4 170bhp 2001 SE 2007

I bought my four year old S80 with 97,000 miles on it. It is now just past 10 yrs old and has 206,460 miles on it. These have all been trouble free motoring. Got it serviced every 12,000 without fail at a local Volvo specialist - VOLMECH.com - not the dealer. Only extra costs have been for normal wear and tear: tyres trackrod control arm bushes, bulbs, one rear suspension leg and the air-con compressor (common fault apparently). It cost £140 to have a second hand one fitted and sys recharged. I’ve only just bought another one this week to replace my original one. Why? Purely because of the age on her, she’s getting old and as I’m travelling to the south of the UK most months lately (2,000 miles), I decided I needed a younger model. By far the best car I’ve ever owned and the one I’ve kept the longest. I normally get tired of them after 2-3 years, not this old girl. Brilliant motorway car sound system, second to none, better mpg than my previous Ford 2.0L motor. This has graceful power and comfort. I’m a convert to Volvo now, I’ll never buy anything else but Volvo again.

Volvo V50 DS 2007

I bought this tin of rubbish and I am now totally regretting it. It has done 80K and has had: a new starter motor, new manual transmission assembly, crankshaft oil seals, new turbo and intercooler, new DMF, clutch and slave cylinder at 75K and now needs another new one. I had an old 340, which went on for 17 years and was always reliable, but this V50 is a total load of rubbish and a disgrace to what was a good marque. It has to be the noisiest car I have ever driven, which can be very annoying on long runs; anything over 30mph and it drowns out the sound system.

Volvo V50 SE Lux Stop Start 2011

First a challenge: To all with more than 1 star for this car, please quote your mpg! I got this car in April 2011 for its economy; at 25,000 miles/year it should be a big saving. How wrong!!! My previous BMW 320D Tourer 170 bhp was fun to drive but only 51 mpg average over the 60k miles I had it, (similar with Passat before that). So the V50 115bhp with 8k on the clock is averaging 52mpg and to get this I am driving like there is an egg shell between my foot and the pedal, with the air-con off most of the time. The car is currently with Volvo (5 days and counting) to solve: 1) Poor fuel consumption 2) Severe "clunk" in the gearbox when changing gear 3) "Reduced engine performance" alarm; this has happened on two occasions so far. In addition it’s already had the dual mass flywheel changed to try and sort out the gearbox clunk. Also, the steering wheel radio and cruise control switches get hot. I totally agree with other posts concerning Volvo claims, which are bordering on lies for the claimed mpg, which were the only reason I went for this car. My advice to anyone is if you are a Volvo nut then OK, but go in with open eyes (and a clunking gearbox), otherwise the BMW or Passat offer more honest claims on achieveable mpg figures and are more fun to drive.

Responses to this review

I have had my 61 plate SE LUX for nearly three months now and have covered 5k miles already. As I had a Ford Mondeo 2.0 estate previously I was looking forward to increased fuel economy, Mondeo averaged 42- 46 mpg over 83k miles loaded/unloaded. Chose the Volvo for tax and fuel reasons. Now I know the mpg figures claimed are for comparison only between manufacturers as the laboratory set up bears no relation to actual driving but I am averaging 48 mpg driving very carefully. Over time maybe an increase, but nowhere near the claimed. The whole ’green’ claims by manufacturers to entice people to buy is lies. 74 mpg for combined claim Volvo. Also worrying is I also have the ’Clunk’ from the gear change. If you have not looked into how the offical figures are obtained, it’s worth a read. Looks like a visit to Volvo? - Keith Pilborough from Buckinghamshire

Volvo V50 2008

I’ve just bought a 3 year old Volvo V50, less than 2 months ago. Last week it lost power to the point of almost breaking down and when I took it to be looked at I was told the particle filter was in a terrible state. The shocking thing is this was bought from a Volvo dealer (Nurnberg) and they must have sold it knowing the particle filter was about to go (either that or they didn’t bother checking it.) We had paid much more than a private deal in order to feel reassured that it was thoroughly checked by the dealer. The particle filter is apparently not covered by the warranty. Who would guess that Volvo are a bunch of cowboys? I’m a very unsatisfied customer who will never buy another Volvo.

Responses to this review

Other than the state of the particle filter this review appears to contain nothing about the V50. This review is a (perhaps justifiable) critical report on a very poor dealership. Rather than never again buying another Volvo, it would be totally understandable if this lady chose never again to buy a car from this dealership. However, as a review of the Volvo V50, this is a very poor review and the star rating (which obviously applies to the dealership rather than the car) should be ignored - C J from Lanarkshire

Volvo V50 2.0 D 2006

A lovely car to drive, but shocking reliability and eye-wateringly expensive to fix. Just out of warranty the dual-mass flywheel failed. Volvo UK’s inclination to help was going to depend, incredibly, on the number of Volvos we’d previously owned. Two, which in their view, was insufficient to incline them to be helpful. The full whack? £1760. Hot on the heels of this, a complete electrical failure; random error messages; lights , windows, wipers doing their own thing - like driving a clown’s car; immobiliser kicking in now and then for a laugh! We paid for the dealer to pull all the wires apart and join them together again. They had no idea what the problem was and we fully expect it to happen again. The air con gave up at roughly the same time as the flywheel. After looking at other peoples’ stories re the V50’s air con system, I’m not even going to bother trying, I’ll live with it and save the £1000+ for something nicer. Never again.

Volvo V60 d5 2011

This is my 8th Volvo from an early 360 through 440, V70, 850, S80, XC70 and XC90. Now the best so far the V60. Gone is the traditional estate, this is a true touring car with enough power to make long distances a treat to drive. Roomy inside and the driving seat is like an armchair. The powerful 2.4 engine is economical, but powerful enough for anyone other than Button or Hamilton. The driver’s pack, which includes front and rear cameras and sensors, automatic braking and lane sensors make this a joy to drive. Out of ten I give it eleven.

Volvo XC90 d5 2007

 

Great car. Safe as houses. Joy to drive. Loads of space, but: Fourth year service, £500. Road tax this year £445. Lucky to get 30mpg, usually nearer 25. Wonderful car but at 8,000 miles a year I can’t afford to run it. Pity but there it is.

 

Volvo C30 2010

Whilst I agree with most of the road test comments, having recently bought a new C30 we find that road noise from the closed windows is excessive and extremely annoying. We have returned the car to the dealer pointing out the problem and they agree that the noise is bad. They say the noise is down to the new design wing mirrors and a number of customers have contacted them regarding this problem. Alas, they say that there is nothing that they can do as it’s a design fault. Buyers beware!

Volvo XC60 T6 AWD 2010

Since we took delivery of our new XC60 T6 12 months ago it has been a nightmare. Our car has 6,500km on the clock, has been off the road for a total of 4 weeks and has experienced the following problems: Engine oil leak - new gasket was fitted and the car was off the road a week; False seat belt alarms (an intermittent fault, that has not been resolved); City safety stopping the car on two occasions when approaching intersections. With no cars / or obstacles in the way, terrifying my wife and two boys. (They claim the software has now been updated, we’ll see); Since the oil leak repair we have had to top-up the engine oil, we suspect we still have an issue and asked the dealer to check this out on the 12 month service. (refer below). The latest incidents occurred when we took our car to the Volvo dealer for its 12 month service and WOF (warranty of fitness test carried out every 12 months); The car failed the WOF due to a leak from the power steering, a new steering rack was fitted; When installing the steering rack the dealer discovered a faulty steering pipe also had to be replaced We were then informed of further delays as a new bolt was also required to complete the same job For the latest fix the car was off the road 16 days When very reluctantly collecting the car we were informed that we would need to return when it’s travelled a further 1,000km so they can check the engine oil!! We contacted Volvo Sweden who claimed it is the responsibility of the NZ agent now, not theirs. We did point out that Volvo manufactured the car, not the agent! Not the type of support I expected when buying a Volvo. We have owned 8 new cars before of different makes without any issues, this is our first and last Volvo.

Volvo V60 T3 R Design 2011

My first Volvo and replacing a Mercedes CLK 320 CDI which my eldest son has grown out of in the back. First the good points: This is the only Volvo I have driven with decent steering, it is sharp and accurate and the grip from the fat 235 low profile tyres is excellent. The ride is firm but not uncomfortable and the gear box is slick. I was worried it would be underpowered but it has just enough go although can struggle when four up especially overtaking where it is often necessary to go down two gears to gain sufficient acceleration. The power delivery is smooth and the engine is very quiet apart from a strange ticking noise under load (direct injection?) but the top end feels constrained. The car looks stunning in white with the 18inch wheels, body kit and twin exhausts really making it stand out. There is plenty of room for passengers and the boot is big enough although not massive with a high floor. The interior is well finished lifted by the white streaks in the seats but does not feel as solid and well built as my previous Mercedes or BMW. Seats are comfortable but don’t hold as well as the Mercedes and seem to be designed for someone of broader beam. The stereo sounds fine but extras such as DAB and Bluetooth require the premium pack. These should be standard. I have a few issues with the car, the first is the stupid electric handbrake. This is located to the right of the driver tucked away at the bottom of the dash and is easy to forget. You push to apply and pull to release which seems to be the wrong way around, and it does not always seem to engage. I am used to push button starters but this one is extremely fussy often asking to be pressed multiple times. The seatbelt warning bongs loudly at the slightest provocation and once would not shut up at all even with my son belted in the rear. The worst fault however is the economy. Despite a 1.6 engine, stop start and high gearing is is struggling to manage 33mpg on the motorway and dipping below 30 on cross country trips or commuting. It is not close to being as economical as by previous 3 litre Turbodiesel Automatic or my previous BMW 318i and 320i petrols despite better official figures than all of them. However despite these niggles I do like it because it isn’t a BMW or Mercedes. It is good looking, reasonably practical, drives well and is a good compromise between ability and comfort. Many testers don’t seem to get the R Design package saying the SE has a better ride. Having driven both I think the R Design is just right and would gladly trade a little comfort for sharper steering, and more attitude inside and out. I may drive a Volvo now but I haven’t given up yet!

Volvo XC90 Active 2010

Fuel consumption is the reason we want rid of this thing. 8,000 miles from new and with the price of fuel it has cost us a fortune. Never been above 30 mpg even driving it very gentle using semi manual. Big mistake, never again. DO NOT BUY ONE!

Volvo S40 S40 Sport 2005

I’ve owned a Volvo S40 Sport 2005 model for over 3 years now and I’ve never had a single thing go wrong with it other than tyres, breaks, the usual wear and tear. I love the sport, very agressive, although road noise is louder than normal, but I put it down to having 18" alloys and lowered. I have had it serviced by Volvo since the day I bought it. I’m on my 3rd S40 (2 were previous shapes, 2001 LPG models.) I will be selling very shortly to get a new S60. :-) I’m on here looking how to change a fuse and with so many people moaning I thought I’d have my say. I love S40’s, good work horses.

Volvo V50 2.0 SE D 2005

Disaster area; this car has done 90K miles, nearly all on motorway so it hasn’t had a hard life, and has been properly serviced. A never-ending series of expensive failures: three wheel bearings; nearside electrics wiring loom; dashboard out for three days to replace faulty air-con component; blocked sunroof drains which trashed the carpets; faulty DPF sensors causing random power loss; cd autochanger packed up; driver’s seat that rocks from side to side. This is what happens when you buy cars built by people who don’t care, using cra**y components from Ford’s spares bins. Wish I’d bought the Mazda 6.

Volvo XC90 D5 SE Sport 2007

I bought my current XC90 new on 2007. It is my second XC and as the first is proving to be extremely practical. It has just covered 85k, most of which has been for business, and for the most has proved impecable. I opted for a vehicle with a high spec and as I have traditionally driven the length and breath of the country the additional extras have proved beneficial. I am, as some of the other owners, disapointed at the under powered D5 engine and agree that a 3.0ltr upgrade would be more usefull. My only real frustration is the cost of the AWD realignment at the main dealers, which really needs attention every 20k/2years to maintain efficient tyre wear. Sadely I feel this will be my last Volvo unless the bring out a newer XC which has a more executive package/feel within the next 18-months.

Volvo S40 1600 s petrol 2005

Got this car two weeks ago and was pleased with it at the start; has 17" alloys and gives a lot of road noise, my doors on passanger side won’t open and the windows won’t operate either and indicator on mirror, suspect a dodgy relay or blown fuse as the other side works fine, will wait and see what the garage says.

Volvo XC60 NSF

Crap.

Volvo XC90 R-Design 2010

Love/hate the XC90! The wife needed to change the car so we plumped for a brand new Volvo R-Design as we got a good deal on it and it does look the business! Gorgeous car, nice interior! Loads of space and great for the kids and all their stuff. Very comfy over long distances too. That makes me love it! Sadly, many reasons to hate it: 20-25mpg round town makes it expensive to run, it does just about muster 30mpg on the motorway! But combined is poor. My old Audi Allroad does 28 and 38 respectively! It is now approaching one year old (under 7000 miles) and will need 2 front tyres soon tho rear are still like new. It has so far had one front bearing replaced under warranty, the complete heating system replaced and now the gearbox is showing signs of imminent failure as it no longer holds on hills in D and is taking longer to click into drive after reversing. Thats going to be expensive and hopefully under warranty! And as mentioned before it does not do snow! It is very front wheel drive biased. On the recent cold snap it was very disappointing! My Audi Allroad is faultless on snow! Car drives ok, but is a bit underpowered, should have put a 3.0l diesel unit! The V8 petrol is great but who can afford to run them!? Volvo dealership service is poor. In its first year it has been in 4 times! and they didnt valet it once! Staff were nice up to the point when we signed for the car - after that "I’m sorry, who are you?" I wouldn’t buy one again!! I honestly dont know how anyone could give this car 10/10, much as I wish I could as I spent the guts of £40k on it. It just aint what I thought I was buying!

Volvo S60 D5 SE 2004

Supreme comfort, flawless build quality, effortless power, unbelivable fuel economy, all the toys, best sound system I ever heard, but why has it got 7 cup holders?? I’ll be having a c70 coupe next, what an awesomely stunning looking car.

Volvo V50 2.0d sport 2007

Is a nice car to drive, but its not put together very well, ours had to have a new starter immediately (was 2 years old) then the aircon never worked and it had a new condenser (£550 fitted at an indy, but went DIY on it and was £200), it has a very noisey turbo which is going to need replacing soon, if you turn on the rear heated screen the radio reception fails. Had to have a new clutch and DMF £1100 and now something feels a little odd when driving in a straight line on changing camber roads. That’s the first year of ownership! oh and it averages 41MPG driven by my wife who is not the most aggresive driver in the world. All that said it’s nice to drive and my wife for some reason loves it, so it could be the car for you!

Volvo V50 Drive 1-6 Auto Stop Start 2010

Great allround car will cruise all day at 70 mph, nice to have a normal hand brake, much better than the one fitted to our V70. However ride and road noise on our unkept rural roads can be a bit over bearing, a change of tyres may help this. Also whilst we return around 54 mpg no matter what we do short of pushing it with the engine turned of we cannot get near Volvo’s claimed figures of 70 mpg, even if nursed along. Noise and ride apart the car is very relaxing to drive even at 6ft and not very thin. I would not hesitate to suggest it to any one else.

Volvo C70 2.0D SE 2009

Car has been a total nightmare. Is 18 months old and has been in 9 times, has 10 faults, and all Volvo is prepared to do is a part exchange for a faulty and unsatisfactory car.

Volvo V50 Diesel Sport 2007

Very disappointed with the quality of this car. Bought a Volvo because of their reputation for solid and reliable build. Six months out of warranty the air conditioning system started condensing into the rear passenger footwell which filled up with water. Dealer could not find a fault and wanted the car for two days whilst they stripped the inside out to find the fault at my expense and Vovlo UK were not interested. Now I’ve had to have the dual mass fly wheel and clutch changed because the flywheel has failed. Flywheel has potential to seriously damage the engine if it fails whilst being driven, it can snap the driveshaft. Am writing to Volvo to complain but on previous experience, they are not too concerned about their reputation. This is not a quality car and I will not buy another Volvo.

Volvo XC60 2.4 Drive SE 2010

I have covered 8,000 miles in this car and it is 10 months old. The car is comfortable and gives a comfortable ride with a feeling of safety. I have the lower powered 175hp engine that can return over 40 mpg but it is only fwd. The car has had a couple of problems sorted out quickly the first was an airbag warning light and the second an update on the software regarding the oil level. There are a few creaks and rattles but these are more noticeable due to the quiteness of the cabin. Overall I am most pleased with the car but I expect to be considering the cost and the age.

Volvo V50 SE Lux Drive 2010

We are very disappointed in the misleading claims made about the green credentials of this car. We used the VCA fuel consumption figures to make a relative decision when choosing our new car. We wanted the most fuel efficient estate available and compared the Volvo V50 figures to other estates and also our car at the time, a BMW 330D Sport. With the latter we averaged 45mpg against the published combined figure of 42.2mpg, with the new V50 we purchased we are now getting 50mpg against a published combined figure of 72.3mpg. Despite continued attempts to get Volvo to address the issue they have been dismissive and arrogant and worryingly for a company purporting to sell ’green’ cars, they seem disinterested in the problem. We know the figures are to compare cars and that is what we did. But Volvo will not even look at our car and the dealer has said there is nothing wrong with it (in fact they even said that we are lucky with the consumption we are getting because their V50s achieve less!). The VCA fuel consumption tests are intended to allow customers to make informed choices between different cars. That is their function. However, our car was supposed to be the most fuel efficient estate car (by some degree) but it is certainly not, and we are convinced that whichever car went through the tests, it was not the same as the car sold to us.

Responses to this review

I have read your review and have had the same experience. I was informed by the salesman that I would achieve an average of 60 mpg and am currently getting 49 mpg! I bought the car on the understanding that I would get the 60 mpg figure. Where do we go next in order to have Volvo answer this failure... I shall contact Which Consumer Association and take their advice! David Barker from Gloucestershire

I agree Samantha, think yourself lucky to be getting 50 mpg. Ive had mine since September and my 1.6 D manages to give me a whopping 38mpg. It’s a complete lie and I think seriously misrepresents the truth. First and last Volvo I will buy - David Green from Lancashire

I’ve had my V50 Drive S/S for three months now and it’s loosening up nicely. Never below 55mpg and that’s with mixed driving conditions throughout the Highlands. A recent trip from Inverness to Aberdeen on the infamous A96 saw 71.2mpg, that was with a busy road resulting in a journey 15 mins longer than usual. Once I get the cabin temp to my liking I also switch off the climate control, makes a difference. 90% of the time it’s only me in the car as well, all this impacts on mpg. This has got to be one of the best cars I’ve owned - does what it says on the tin with a bit of class and very comfortable. Having traded down from cars like X5s and Disco 3, I don’t have any complaints - Stewart Meikle from Inverness-shire

I am so glad I have found this page. I bought my 59-plate V50 in August thinking I would get to within 10-15% of reported figures. How very wrong I was. I mostly do motorway driving and get 45-52mpg at very best. Very very dissapointed to the extent that I wonder if the reported mpg figures are actually kmpg figures in disguise. Anyone want to contact Watchdog to investigate? Could Volvo be considered as being fraudulent? - Tim W from Cheshire

I’m glad I’m not the only one dissatisfied with the economy on a V50. I, like you, looked for an economical estate and having had a V70 a few years ago went for the V50 this time with the 1.6D engine which has a published combined mpg of 65.2. Having had it six months, I have ranged between 39 and 43. I have complained to Volvo, the garage have said there is nothing wrong, I emailed customer services and they quoted all the Government stuff and went on about driving styles and road conditions affecting consumption. I even wrote to the MD of Volvo UK and he couldn’t be bothered to answer my letter personally, preferring to get the lady that I had received emails from to repeat everything from her emails in letter form. They are not one bit interested. I am now waiting on the lease company to hopefully agree to take the vehicle back so I can go and get a German car - Tierney Mark from Devon

I’m so glad I found this site and read the reviews on the V50! I think the V50 is really nicely styled and looks good on the road but the reliability seems shockingly bad, I must admit that I was disappointed when I sat in one in the showroom and there is not an awful lot of legroom for the driver, I think though that the poor mpg that people seem to suffer from is not only an issue with Volvo but with all diesel cars fitted with DPF (Diesel Particulate Filters) as these are a honeycombe like cylindrical filter fitted close to the exhaust manifold to catch soot particles which are then burnt off using a term called ’regeneration’. This increases exhaust gases in excess of 500 oC, unfortunately it increases fuel consumption hence the low mpg. I had my DPF filter removed from my last car ’Ford Focus 1.6 DHTI and guess what - mpg rose from 42mpg to 53mpg. I am now looking at purchasing a Toyota Avensis 2.0 D4D with a 5 year guarantee, loads of leg room and the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in - Steve from England

Volvo V70 V70 170BHP SE 2001

I own two Volvos with my first one being a 21 year old 740 that without doubt is the most reliable car i ever had, so with some trepidation i bought a V70 2001 about 4 years ago with 100,000 miles on it that had been converted to LPG, so with Volvo being owned by Ford and many parts on the V70 from Ford I was expecting Ford reliability, but to my genuine surprise with the car now having covered 151,000 this is not the case. The good bits first; the auto gear box is bullet proof comes from Aisin-Warner in Japan and simply a very tough box, the engine also very tough I have the 170bhp variant keep giving it regular synthetic oil changes and has not let me down. The bad bits are; the V70 mk2 has relatively soft bushes on the suspension points and as with many V70 my two front wishbones have been replaced due to bush wear, also to drop links need to be done, back tyres are now showing wear on the inside which is a common problem as the inner rear suspension bushes start to wear, also have a small leak in the A/C the needs topped up every summer. One other problem to note is the hand brake shoes, as with many automatics the handbrake tends not to be used much and Volvo decided to use a inferior brake shoe which over time the friction material comes away from the metal due to inferior glue, as a result the pad coming away gets logged between the drum and the other shoes and can cause catastrophic failure to the whole hub. I had this happen on one side at around 129,000 luckily I stopped as soon as I felt a shudder, when I took the drum off I found disintegrated brake shoe but luckily no major damage. I checked the other handbrake shoes to find the friction material was about to come away, so if you have a V70 Mr2 and the handbrake shoes have never been checked do so as the cost to replace the whole hub can be very costly. As to day to day living you would think this big car would be good for a family of five but the very poor rear leg room and not that roomy rear seats has led to many fights with my three sons in the back. It has got so bad that when we have to go on long trips we take the 7 seater 740 also LPG for the longer trips, so if you have three younger kids look for the 7 seater V70 will make a big difference. As to economy its pretty thirsty around the town on LPG it gets 20mpg but at 0.66 per litre this is equates to about 38mpg for the same cost if on petrol. On petrol you get 22.5mpg in town, on long runs LPG gives 27mpg and about 32mpg on petrol. I forgot to mention one last problem was the drivers heated seat has just recently stopped working, probably a loose connection but if anyone has had this happen and had it fixed let me know what the issue was, I miss that warm bum feeling on a snowy morning.

Volvo S40 2004

Excellent car, drives well, road holding excellent, fuel good and when car is ticking over it’s very quiet. The only fault to my mind is that the rear window could do with a wiper. This is my 2nd Volvo, my first was an 850 auto, and both have been excellent cars.

Volvo XC90 SE Geartronic 2003

Bought new when they were launched. A number of teething problems that were dealt with under warranty. The gearbox reverse is intermittent and needs to be replaced (£4000.00) the steering rack is shot (£1000.00) amongst a number of other things. The car has not been off road or abused (7 year old and under 60,000 miles) all very disappointing for what we thought was a premuim brand. Will not buy another.

Volvo C70 2.0 lpt GT Convertible 2002

Had it now for nearly 6 years now. Brilliant car! Apart from the usual tyres and servicing, nothing has gone wrong. Didn’t have a wind deflector when we bought it, bought one direct from Volvo, which was cheaper than an aftermarket one! Would love another one to match this one!! Very under rated and is a very safe car!

Volvo S40 2004

Don’t buy one, there is a common problem with the brakes, a light appears telling you the brakes have failed and to pull over, the engine then slows down, going from 70 to 15 on a motorway can be a very dangerous problem. If you look on the internet you will find loads of people with the same problem, also the same response from Dealers and Volvo, they cannot find out what it wrong as it doesn’t show a code, therefore there is nothing wrong with the vehicle other than the fact that it either doesn’t start or stops the engine whilst driving. I maybe "only a woman" but that is a pretty serious problem to me. I have complained to Volvo direct and they are not interested, I now intend to spread the word and speak to The Office of Fair Trading. Hopefully someone will make the manufacturer responsible before someone is killed.

Responses to this review

Somebody has had their feet high up in the front passenger footwell and with a kick or knock have slightly dislodged a connection. Up high behind the dash is the CEM Control panel module. Open it up, drop it down and make sure everything is connected. Then lock it back up. Problem solved - Paul H from England

Volvo C30 2.0 D R-Design 2010

Well built and is a good drive (luxuries of larger Volvos are not cheapened or scaled down), overall a very happy driver! However, be warned there is not a lot of rear or boot space and services can be expensive! Not a family car.

Volvo S40 2.0 D 2005

Absolute rubbish, bought from dealers at 18 months old with 19000 miles on clock. First dual mass flywheel failure at 21000, repaired under warranty. Two weeks later clutch and the two week old flywheel had failed so on its 3rd flywheel at 21500 miles. 62000 miles failed gearbox, replaced under warranty; the gearbox that volvo fitted was a recon and was worse than the one that came out, eventually they agreed it was faulty so it had another fitted. 65000 miles signs of imminent flywheel failure so I got rid sharpish and changed it for a proper volvo an S60 d5 which has been superb. Don’t be fooled by the S40, it’s a Ford Focus in a posh body with a Ford engine that’s well known for serious and frequent transmission failures. Worst thing Volvo ever did was to get involved with Ford.

Responses to this review

If anything, Volvo quality improved under Ford ownership. I’ve had two S40s, and they’ve both been excellent cars. The Focus platform is one of the best around. Without Ford, Volvo would have gone to the wall - Craig Coleman from Yorkshire

Volvo XC90 185BHP 2005 SE Manual 2005

Love/hate relationship with my XC90 After owning a Freelander for 4 years from new (which never let me down - despite poor reliability reputation). I chose the XC90 due to it’s practicality - really wanted the X5, but the boot space & 2nd row of seats meant there was no comparison - better spec as well for price. Love: I cannot fault the car’s styling & practicality, a bit noisier cruising than I expected - I keep thinking a window is slightly open when on the motorway as you tend to be aware of other vehicles passing by Consumption very good for a car of this size - we average 27 around town & 34.5 on motoway runs. Hate: Reliability is a problem - cars done 50,000 miles & on my 3rd set of Front wheel bearings, Dealer replaced rear set under warrenty after 18 months. Issue with CD player not shutting down properly & draiing battery. Very unimpressed with Dealership - I seem to be paying a premium for poor customer service. Eats standard factory fit tyres - 8000 miles on 1st set - average 25K on pirelli scorpions now. A plastic butterfly throttle was shown to be snapped on last service - £90 for parts - £400 to fit! (at cheaper Volvo specialist) Last service cost £1400 at cheaper independant.! Expected better for a 37K car - problems supposed to be resolved in later vehicles. Need to replace the car next year - If the customer sservice was better I would have another & hope reliability better as lease prices very competative - definitely extend warranty if I do though - trying to convince the wife she want a Q7.

Volvo XC90 XC90 3.2 AWD 2008

The Volvo XC90 is one of the best SUVs available in the market today. This fine Scandinavian design puts it far ahead of competitors in terms of aesthetics and good looks. I’ve had my black 7 seater 3.2 AWD petrol engine for almost a year now, 20.000 kms, with no problem whatsoever. Volvos are famous for their safety, durability and build qualities, the XC90 is no exception.The 3.2, 6 cylinder engine should produce more horse power than the 238 available. It has a high fuel consumption, but this is somehow normal for vehicles of this weight. If you opt for the Premium sound system, 12 Dynaudio speakers, you’ll enjoy one of the best audio systems installed in any car, any make, any year. If you are looking for muscles and performance,look some where else, this fine vehicle is designed for people who value quality and reliability. Keep rolling Volvo.

Responses to this review

Abed, how much a car like yours is worth in the Lebanese market? Mike from England

Hey, I’m sick of people like this guy in England who obviously can’t afford to Service and keep it fueled up! Then don’t buy a Heavy S.U.V! I’m laughing my a*s off at people saying "oh I can’t get 25mpg blah ,blah". What a cheap a*s! Go drive a Fiat 500 - Jason from United States of America

Volvo XC90 D5 exec 2010

Bought a Volvo XC90 D5 exec. Great car to drive and to be in. Just 2 issues until now. 1 - Poor urban economy; I was told the economy will improve with time 2 - Volvo oncall system keeps getting cancelled on its own. Been to the dealers 3 times and they don’t seem to know why. Looks like its a common problem with all Volvos. To make matters worse I have paid another £100 for an extended Volvo oncall security package but what’s the point if its not working at all most of the time? I would rather have preferred not to have this facility at all. In hindsight would have gone for the Subaru Forester

Volvo S40 T5 2008

This is our 4th Volvo, second S40 T5. Build quality, safety and reliability are brilliant. Extremely responsive on over taking. Averaging 34mpg, our older T5 was slightly better. Have the r-design but prefered the older wooden dash board, apart from that we are very happy with the car. Servicing is a ridiculous price as we only have one dealer north Scotland and Highlands!! Perth and Dundee are a bit more competitive. Sound system 6cd player is fantastic. Would certainly miss the 240 bhp if I down scaled.

Volvo XC70 SE Lux 2005

We bought the XC70 in June specifically for towing our 5-berth caravan and as the family runaround for my wife. Having clocked 1500 miles on our round trip to south-west France I can report that it towed very well and returned reasonable MPG. When not towing we’re doing around 35 MPG, which for 2.4 163BHP engine is good. The engine pulls like a train and sounds fab; not quite the same burble as a V8 but not at all bad. The 5 cylinder engine makes for relaxed motorway cruising and at 80 mph it feels more like 60. It is quite a sporty engine in a vehicle that doesn’t look like it would rush anywhere, a veritable wolf in sheep’s clothing. We’re yet to put it to the test in wintery conditions, but a friend of mine with an 04 XC70 was delighted with her vehicle’s performance last winter. The tiptronic gearbox is used and it is very easy to operate; if you are towing a ’van then it is a dream to have the manual override especially having moved from an auto ’box on an MPV. Overall, I very much like the XC70; it is solid, well-built and rides higher than its V70 counterpart. We were considering the XC90 but with a higher tax bracket and a heavier body to carry around (with not that much more luggage space) I think the XC70 is a great vehicle that offers 4WD stability and you don’t need a diesel tanker following you around as with the latest Discoverys, which I hear struggle to achieve 20MPG and that’s the diesel option.

Volvo V40 2.5D 1999

I bought my V70 diesel new at the end of 1999, and it’s still going strong - and strong is the word. Now done 151k miles, no appreciable engine wear, original clutch, gearbox etc. I have had to replace the usual parts as they wore out - shocks, brakes discs and calipers etc - and I have had it serviced by the book by a specialist, but it has been very good value for money so far. I paid £23k for a fully loaded car with all the toys in Holland, and imported it to UK, getting what would have been a £32k UK priced car for £9k less. I expect to get another 10 years or so out of it, which means I will have spent roughly £1k per year to fly around in a lovely car with a high spec. I doubt very much whether you would find another care which would offer the same at this price. If anyone else out there thinks like I do - buy them new/nearly new, them run them into the ground - Volvo is a very good way to go. I have driven a lot of hire cars for work over the years, all new or nearly new, and it is always a relief to get out of them and back into my 11 year old V70 as it feels so sharp and responsive by comparison. Excellent car.

Volvo XC90 Executive 2006

I have owned a black xc90 D5 Exec with nearly every extra (DVD, satnav, fridge etc) for the last 4years, from new, and have put 112,000 miles on it. So I’m in a pretty good position to have a view! The good points are that it looks good, is spacious, comfortable, is reasonably economical given its size. The built in child seat is excellent. The bad points are numerous and I would not buy another. The biggest problem is the engine. It is underpowered, sounds like a tractor, and has ’lag’ from stationary that has put me in dangerous situations several times - literally you can wait for 3 seconds before starting to accelerate which is scary when a truck is bearing down on you! It also doesn’t do snow. Actually 4x4 is a misnoma - because it doesn’t have limited slip differentials or ’diff lock’ as soon as one wheel gets stuck all the others have no traction at all. So it is really a 4x1. It is oddly expensive on tyres. The satnav has a mind of its own, sends you odd routes, doesn’t do postcode navigation, and the graphics are appalling. It has just failed and I’m told it is going to be a very large bill to replace. Now its a few years old I would prefer to put secondhand parts on it. But Volvo have put chips into nearly everything on the car that mean you can only replace things at a main dealer for full price. I’m told that even goes down to things like the mirrors, wiper motors, anything. They claim that this is to reduce theft - call me a cynic! Smaller niggles include the headlight dip which is the type that needs 2 movements to dip (why do manufacturers do that?), a very plasticy dashboard (on their top version that isnt acceptable), an expensive DVD system that doesn’t and has never worked and the dealer couldnt get it to work and other little things... I have only failed to replace it because it isnt important in my life, but I’m really looking forward to my new audi Q7 arriving. My other car is an Aston Martin DBS so dont worry about me - I get my kicks elsewhere....

Volvo V50 1.6 e drive 2010

I am very pleased with my car and love the sporty features in and out. However the 1.6 has 100+ bhp and sometimes I feel it a little lacking in power. Would recommend to anyone.

Volvo V50 2.4 d5 2005

Love the car definitely a serious contender for the BMW 3 series or the Audi A4. The interior is great with stylish features and the outside of the car looks sporty. Well done Volvo. Have had no problems with it and am very happy.

Volvo V50 2.0d 2007

Great car no faults. Love the modern interior centre console and the styling on the outside lights. Would reccomend to anybody if they want a practical, safe estate car.

Volvo V60 T5 2006

Firstly, yes as said by others the turning circle isn’t great, but you soon get used to it. This is my second S60 (previously a 2002 2.0 SE) so that should say something. The seats in the S60 are by far the best around (possibly only matched by the Saab 9-5). The T5 has a 2.4 V5 engine with 260 bhp and a 0-60 time of just 6.5 seconds - why do you think the motorway police use this engine! The S60 handles great, with good feedback, and it is at home on A and B roads as much as cruising the motorway. I have driven both BMW and Lexus (as hire cars) before now and the S60 is so much better. This is a drivers car, the sort you want to take out on a driving run for pleasure. Excellent!

Volvo S60 T5 2006

Firstly, yes as said by others the turning circle isn’t great, but you soon get used to it. This is my second S60 (previously a 2002 2.0 SE) so that should say something. The seats in the S60 are by far the best around (possibly only matched by the Saab 9-5). The T5 has a 2.4 V5 engine with 260 bhp and a 0-60 time of just 6.5 seconds - why do you think the motorway police use this engine?! The S60 handles great, with good feedback, and it is at home on A and B roads as much as cruising the motorway. I have driven both BMW and Lexus (as hire cars) before now and the S60 is so much better. This is a drivers car, the sort you want to take out on a driving run for pleasure. Excellent!

Volvo C30 2.4 2008

The car feels fantastic and totally solid. No defects so far. Very quiet on the motorway and good suspension. It’s not a bone shaker for people who want "involving" drive and good lap times but more a cruiser. I love the original design of this car. Only downside is that Volvo has ruined this car with a terrible facelift. I would only buy a used one, pre 2010.

Volvo XC60 Se Lux Premium D5 205bhp AWD 2010

I bought a new silver D5 AWD in Feb 2010 with every extra possible excepting Self Levelling Suspension (dealer talked me out of it) which I now wish I had ordered as it cannot be retro-fitted. Overall I think it’s a good car but not great. My main complaint is engine noise from the D5, when accelerating hard especially up hill or when towing it is very noisy, when cruising between 80 - 90mph it is annoyingly noisy even with all round laminated glass. Then came the problems. Electric boot refuses to close sometimes, been back 3 times but did it again the other day, sat-nav lost it’s voice intermittently dealer reset it. Back for child lock warning message twice, replaced lock. windscreen wipers over wiping and tapping on metal surround, adjusted twice now can’t pull them off the windscreen when washing as they hit the bonnet due to over adjustment, seat belt trim split and replaced. Rear suspension noise, back twice boot suspected and lock adjusted, second visit spring dampers fitted. Rattle from back door, lock adjusted to latch door properly. It’s been a frustrating start with this car, I hope it gets more reliable with age,. It’s a nice car to drive overall. Economy? I challenge anyone to get better than 31-32 mpg average, I drive very carefully and rarely venture into town and couldn’t get my overall average over 31.5 in the first 6000 miles before I starting towing. If they sort the engine noise and reliability in the future it would be a great car.

Volvo V50 2.0 diesel se lux 2010

Great car very happy with the experience of owning it and loved the interior space and style. The ride is a bit firm with the run flat tyres but the seats make up for the sometimes firm ride. The safety features made this a great car for the family and we found the boot space okay and the little storage facilities were very useful.

Volvo V50 2.0 diesel se 2008

Great car. I admit its boot isn’t the biggest but compared with the price of an Audi or BMW it is good value. I have looked at the boot size compared to the Audi A4 and found that there is ony a 6cm difference in length and 4cm in depth. The interior is well equipped and I love the clean lines with the sporty brushed alluiminium trim. The interior style is modern with easily used buttons exactly were you would want them. I found the Volvo V50 price the best thing about this car and this makes it the best value car in its bracket.

Volvo V50 2.0L Tdi 2004

Considering the short while I owned my V50 I remember it with pleasure. The performance, road holding and economy were very good - 50mpg without nursing. The seating comfort was the best in any car I have owned and the safety features were excellent. The Dolby Pro Logic sound system was superb and the bi xenon headlamps were fantastic. The emission was very clean although the engine wasn’t the quietest Tdi I’ve ever owned. The semi low profile tyres were a nuisance - giving an uncomfortable ride and road noise. The rear tail gate, when open, meant you had to bend low to load anything in the small load area and when letting the back seats down on one occasion they fell forward tearing my watch off and injuring my arm - like dropping two paving slabs. The external body panels were thin and were prey to any careless mum opening a door in Tesco car park. 6th gear was an overdrive, no good for overtaking unless there was plenty of space. But after a long drive you arrived feeling comfortable and that is a pretty good test of a car in my opinion.

Volvo V70 d5 se auto 2003

This is my 5th Volvo estate and the best car to date, I include all cars I’ve had as a former car salesman. I still deliver cars for a large rental company, getting the chance to drive many new cars. I have just done a 1600 mile trip ’round Scotland and recorded 54.2 mpg. This the most comfortable car I drive as I suffer with all the pains we old ’uns get. She holds the road like glue and carries most things. Hopfully I will have Volvos ’til they wheel me out in one.

Volvo XC60 de luxe 2008

I had one of the first batch I believe as I bought it on October 2008 and it is registered in that year. I had it in mind for some time; saw it in its wrappers in the showroom yard while having a major service on my XC90 and bought it there and then. 15,423 miles up to today. No faults so far. Recall today by Volvo of a couple of small items which they wanted to look at. Clean bill of health. Used mainly on long journeys so fuel consumption is quite amazing - up to 48 mpg on diesel. I do have a light foot. Very impressed with handling and comfort as I have a number of problems with my back and on knee joint. The brakes are excellent as I have had to used them hard on two occasions due to others. The overall panel fit and finish is of a very high standard. Would I buy another one? Yes, except I will not need a vehicle of this size in the future. The C30 looks very tempting and the new C60 to be announced in 2011, is getting my cheques book excited. But, whatever it is, it WILL be a Volvo. Sold on them.

Volvo S80 2009

Nice drive and very nice interior especially the leather option. Practical but still looks good with a sporty edge. Good value for money.

Volvo V50 Sport pack turbo diesel 2006

Great car. Tried Audi/BMW before buying but Audi’s ride too harsh and Beemer too pricey for what you get. Have had minor problems (as I’ve had with every single car I’ve owned) but nothing to beef about. You never get the fuel consumption figures that are published because these are achieved (by all manufacturers) on a rolling road with no wind resistance, hills etc. If you think you should, you are delusional. Good driver’s car and you can travel all day and step out with no sore bits. If you’re looking at Volvo don’t be put off by almost every motoring journalist who still thinks they’re ’tweed cap’ - they don’t ever acknowledge Volvo’s successes in saloon car racing and don’t realise that time moves on.

Volvo XC90 D5 SE Diesel 2010

I have recently obtained the vehicle. I was worried that moving from a BMW5 series 530D, I would be disappointed by the reduction in power, especially the torque in the lower gears. As a result I had a Polestar chip fitted uprating the engine to 205 BHP. This cost £700. Whilst the top and lower speeds are not really affected it does hit the mark in the ’mid-ways’. This also caused a problem with SAGA my insurers who wanted to charge a premium of £1500 with 60%NCD. Aviva came to the rescue with a more reasonable £480. I am only 1500 miles into the vehicle but as I do mostly motorway driving I do enjoy the higher driving postion and the very safe feeling one gets from the Volvo. I can also fill up the back with all sorts of music and PA equipment. I hope it lasts my three year contract.

Volvo S60 S60 D5 2004

Like many other reviewers, having had BMW, Merc, Range Rover and Audi my expectation of executive driving was high. Without doubt the Volvo S60 D5 is the best car I have driven, it is awesome on the motorway, extremely well built, fantastic sound system and overall a great car.

Volvo XC60 D5 R-Design SE 2010

Volvo ownership does something for you. It declares your intention to go for the best and to be guided by good solid commonsense, mediated with innate taste. Behind the wheel of one of this company’s superb products you are very clearly not trying to impress, but at the same time are creating the best of impressions. These cars have class by the bucket load and don’t have to dip their toes in the twinkly tinsel of flash in order to steal a march on rivals. It’s rather like the difference between understated, made to measure apparel that comes - as all good things do - at a price, but a sensible one, and designer labelled fashionable fripperies that ’costa packet’ and don’t guarantee a pocket to put your hands in. With a Volvo you know to expect comfort, performance, style, safety, good residuals and a warm acknowledgement from fellow road users who are rightfully suspicious of undue ostentation and conspicuous flag waving of the parvenu kind. It comes as no surprise then that the XC60 has been named ’Best SUV’ by influential title Fleet News where it beat off competition from Audi Q5, BMW X5 and Ford Kuga. To be more specific, with the XC60 one has everything one expects of an upmarket SUV with the addition of enough bells and whistles to serve a cross channel ferry negotiating busy sea lanes. It’s a big car, but as captain, you’ll feel completely in control and as comfortable as a first class passenger in a force nine gale. Driver aids are many and multifarious, ensuring safe and secure passage along the highways and byways of our congested roads.You’re safe and secure in all conditions and need not fear whatever adversary the highway gremlin may strew in your path. Whilst off-road capability is obviously there, it’s most definitely not a competitor to rival a Land Rover or a Jeep: it is a gentle off-roader of the refined kind. The standard ’City Safety Pack’ has radar that sees ahead and at speeds under 20 mph applies the brakes if you are distracted and about to collide with the vehicle in front. I tried it with a big piece of foam rubber taped to a cardboard box and tried to run into it: it didn’t work. Hmm! Perhaps it was ’stealth foam’ that doesn’t show up on radar. There are also ’blind spot’ sensors in the mirrors that warn you if a vehicle is lurking unobserved - most useful. Similarly if you stray over clown painted white lines, a bing bong noise wakes you up. God’s teeth! why not just learn to control a motor car and stay awake? Most useful though are the red lights that are projected onto the windscreen to warn you that you are too close to the vehicle ahead. This should be a feature in all cars because it really concentrates the mind and re-educates tailgaters. It’s nice to know that while incident free motoring may not make for highly dramatic reportage, safety features in abundance guarantee safe arrival and happy endings - so who would argue with that. Inside this crossover SUV It’s solid, airy and well appointed with everything being of excellent quality. There’s lots of room for five to travel at ease and it’s well equipped with comfort features like dual zone climate control and an excellent sound system. The driving position is typically high and from a ’command’ position you get an excellent all round view. At the wheel one feels supremely confident, eminently sensible and refined in taste - almost to patrician levels. In short, the driver feels good and passengers feel secure and comfortable. It suits the discerning motorist down to the ground. Tested with the 2.4litre,205PS five cylinder diesel engine driving through a six speed manual gearbox to all wheels, performance was brisk for a vehicle of its size with responsive handling and surefooted road holding through bends. The adventurous can travel at 130mph if they wish and if one is in a thrusting mood,60mph can be reached in under eight seconds. Much more importantly, throttle response and overtaking ability enable you to cover distances surprisingly rapidly. During the test your correspondent did not ’spare the horses’ having matters of grave urgency to attend to at different points of the compass. Of course, these days only the feckless ignore fuel consumption and I have to say that, in its class ,the figures are extremely competitive while the performance never leaves one in doubt that whatever the conditions, here is a motor that will deliver - more reliably it has to be said, than today’s postal services. Despite a thorough thrashing, economy never dipped below 39.4 mpg. Surely a huge embarrassment to Ford, I mused, reminding myself of the new Fiesta automatic I had tested recently that returned barely 31mpg. It’s a splendid diesel engine in this installation, but some will criticize the slight ’gruffness’ under load. It’s nothing to complain about really - but it’s not as super smooth as some diesel rivals - but it’s smooth enough. At a time of great financial and ecological uncertainty one feels that here is a vehicle you can bank on. It’s a Volvo through and through and that means you can trust it to do what it says on the tin - to coin a phrase.(No wonder the canny Chinese have leapt in!). Weaving my way through congested city streets I felt imbued with the aura of understated celebrity, rather as if a respected theatrical knight were negotiating the Saturday afternoon hordes in the shopping precinct. I was astonished when, in a ’fifty fifty’ situation, a boy racer flashed me the ’go ahead’ - and as I obligingly negotiated the gap, he acknowledged my wave as if to say ’suits you sir’. Politicians today bang on about ’change’, but quite frankly where this Volvo XC60 D5 R-Design SE is concerned, I wouldn’t change a thing.

Volvo S40 2.4is 2004

This is my first Volvo and certainly not my last. Due to family I am restricted to a 4 door vehicle and also need the practicality, something with a bit of get up and go should the need arise; enter volvo’s 2.4i five pot engine, what a peach, what a sound. I was sold the moment I drove this superb looking car with a chic interior to match. My car was a unmarked 1 owner 4 year old with 34k on the clock when I purchased it 2 years ago for £8000. I do a lot of miles mainly fast cross country B roads and it has never let me down, it’s over taking ability is excellent as is it’s handling (although my wife complains of the harsh ride ?) it’s quite versatile regarding load carrying ability due to it’s drop down rear seats. It is now showing 70k (miles) and feels none the worse, main cost’s being servicing and tyres ("17" can be pricey) but servicing can be realistic using none franchised Volvo specialists and I do get 33mpg. Definately a wolf in sheeps clothing and not much slower than the T5 variant in the real world, pick up a bargain, A PREMIUM FAST 4 DOOR SALOON THAT HANDLES.

Volvo V50 2009

A recent convert to the volvo brand I now know why people don’t switch back. if you have been put off by the tweedy old man image then maybe it is time for another look. The styling may not match some more modern rivals but it is far from dated. Once you’re inside, cocooned in Scandinavian safety the comfort and quality grab you. The ride is responsive and belies the fact that this is a small estate. I do long trips in all weathers mainly on motorways but also some rough tracks. The V50 copes with it all. Grunt is there when you need it with this 2.0 diesel model but also good economy over long distances. So it maybe tweedy but then tweed is back in fashion.

Volvo S80 D5 S 2002

Best seats and most room (including the back seats) of any car I’ve owned in 40yrs of motoring. After 147,000 miles it still runs perfectly. I’ve had the car for the last 18mths and 23,000 miles during which time I’ve just had one rear shock absorber go and still got a wierd problem with the climate control, which works fine for half hour then all air flow nearly stops - still to be sorted out. I get actual 40mpg although the computer says 50! New front Michelins just changed after 18,000 miles. Fly by wire accelerator very slow response, radio fantastic, suspension a bit hard for a luxury car not as refined as a Merc. Great engine torque, relaxed overtaking easy. I’d buy another one!

Volvo XC90 Exec 2009

Bought my Volvo XC90 new six months ago, black D5 exec with running boards and dark tinted windows to rear, it cost 32k from internet supplier. Looks great, great handling due to 19" wheels and new firmer damping, the ride is a little harsh as a result. Never had a car that feels so safe and solid. Do not believe the mpg figures, in the real world is 23 mpg for shopping trips and school run and 30 mpg on motorway. This is with moderate driving. Every gadget I could wish for on exec model, bit of a bargain for 11.5k off list through drive the deal. Gets a lot of admiration as it is a real looker in this trim / colour. D5 performance is reasonable, feels faster than my Celica, which is supposedly quicker probably the D5’s torque Diesel audible but quite pleasant sound. No faults.

Responses to this review

Had my xc90 exec for 12 months - very reliable car which has a real feel good factor for the driver. Feels faster than performance figures suggest which may be down to the high torque and the fact you get a feeling of safety and security when pushing it hard. Must be said you tend to feel like king of the road when driving a large SUV with the high seating position combined with volvo safety. Nice roomy but car never used the third row of seats yet but a great way to transport loads of people and your stuff. Dont think this will be a cheap car to own, diesel consumption appears to be around 23 - 33 depending on how and where it is driven. But for me at least it is well worth the cost of buying and running this car. Must say I have never found a car with cheap tyres and frugal fuel consumption that I like to drive. verdict - nice car to own and drive which will transport you and 6 of your loved ones virtually anywhere you could reasonably wish to go in complete luxury and safety - Robert Radcliffe from Buckinghamshire

Volvo V50 F1.8 2008

Nothing but trouble with this from the day I bought it, has broken down now 3 times. 1st time after only 5 days. Customer service was weak, garage since closed!!! Started stalling when stopped at lights, is now a gamble if it starts at all in the mornings.... Fuel economy sitting on 9.8l/100km about 23 mpg, and thats using petrol not bio. Car feels clunky in the gear change,; did i mention £220 for a replacement Pirelli tyre? This car is now a burden and the current climate means I cant sell it. Boo hoo Volvo

Responses to this review

This is my third time writing and in response to your article I would like to say that I paid no more than £145 for 18" Pirelli rosso tires from Volvo main dealers. my main dealer put customer service first always - Peter Fearnley from Yorkshire

Your experiences are similar to those of my father who has been a Volvo driver since 1971. His 07 plate V50 has failed him twice - thank goodness the car comes with RAC membership. Both times it has failed him abroad with the nearest garage an hour’s drive away. The RAC have been brilliant but why is it happening with Volvo, hitherto enjoying a good reputation their electrical problems on the V50; my wife’s also suffered ahd had the ingition system replaced and a third car broken down. What has been happening to Volvo since 2006? Faith in the brand has been damaged to such an extent that after 20+ cars one after the other another manufacturer is being considered - Adrian Thompson from Hertfordshire

Volvo S60 S60 D5 2003

Bought my S60 D5 at 2 years old with 25k on the clock and have now completed over 85k in it. It is by far and away the best car I have ever owned having had BMWs, Mercs etc. Average of 45mpg (even with a heavy right foot) and cheap insurance. The torque on the motorway is fantastic and I would highly recommend this car to anyone who actually enjoys driving. S60s eat miles up with ease. Only down side is the cost at Volvo dealers for servicing but any reputable garage can service the car with ease and for a fraction of the price. Def keeping mine for now as it still looks and drives like new. Never a minutes worry in 4 years and the safest car I have had the pleasure to own.

Volvo XC90 D5 Active Geartronic 2009

My wife and I had been looking at an XC90 around 3 years ago when she was 1st pregnant and at the time we just couldn’t get one for our budget of £25k. We decided to go for a BMW X3 2.0d se demo that was on offer and had plenty of toys (leather, privacy glass, h/seats etc). This car was faultless for the 2 1/2 years we had it having only 1 service with BMW (£190) in 28k miles and averaging 42mpg on short journeys. However it was coming up due a large service and 4 new tyres so I started looking again and visited Volvo to look at the XC60 and ended up buying a new XC90....got a 2010. MY This car is nicer to drive (although not as sporty its far more comfortable) and has great road prescence. As my wife is expecting our 2nd child it is going to be prefect as the boot is huge and the car has loads of nice wee family friendly touches. Its only done 2K miles since we got it and the only faults I would mention are : 1. I’m getting poor mileage - average 27mpg which I hope will improve in time as the engine gets run in. 2. A car this size should def have front parking sensors as standard. We ordered the car in fairly standard spec; Metallic paint, automatic and winter pack - that was really it, the standard spec is the same as an SE less full leather and alloy wheels are a wee bit smaller, add to the SE spec you get privacy glass and adaptive xenons; we are delighted so far. All of this plus 3 years servicing included for £24k; there was a 3 year old XC90 SE on the forecourt with 42k miles and it was the old D5 ( 163 ) and it was for sale for 21k, only 1 year warranty and no servicing ????? I think I can do without leather seats thanks. Ill keep you posted

Volvo XC60 D5 SE Lux 2008

This car was chosen to replace an uncomfortable A6 estate, and in most respects it has done a sterling job: It’s VERY comfortable, it’s good in bad weather, it is the best towing car I’ve had, and it handles fairly well for a car of this bulk. In my opinion, it’s damn good looking, too. It is not economic, and struggles to beat 30mpg - if economy is the main requirement then steer clear. Considering previous experience with Volvo, it hasn’t been bullet proof, either - electrical gremlins shut the car down in France due to a problem with the AC system (the subject of a subsequent recall) and failed drivers electric window (not useful at an airport car park) and failed rear door closed indicator (which prevented the car from being locked) have been an irritation. Overall, I’ve had the car about a year and on balance it’s good; cruising and comfort spring to mind in terms of the car’s strong points, but fuel consumption is too high for my liking.

Responses to this review

Hi, its said that the volvo xc60 will do 47 mpg 2wd is that right? - Gary Williams from Swansea

Volvo V50 D SE 2004

Great when it works - have spent £1300 on new Engine management and 6 months later it has now decided to start intermittently. Volvo dealership is pretty useless, think they just swap parts and read codes until you run out of money! Servicing is too expensive and electronics are very nice but appear a bit flakey. Looks pretty though - something to look at when you can’t drive the so**ing thing!

Volvo S40 T5 2007

I bought it second hand, a super deal 2 years ago. The power and aceleration are super! Suspension is not sporty but comfortable. Mechanical and electrical problems: just one, a bulb. It is a big car and I like the ride; it is easy to park everywhere. The adventages are 1 - great acceleration and acceptable km/ lt average 2- Super comfortble ergonomic seats 3- safety, fantastic double glass windows 4- style, design and a great stereo performance.

Volvo S40 2.4 Geartronic 2005

Without sounding soppy, I simply love this car. I bought it second hand and it had been previously owned/driven by someone who had been less than caring when it comes to maintenance, but even so my impressions are of of very solid, well balanced, very safe and highly responsive car. On the long road, the 2.4l engine eats up the miles, at very acceptable levels of consumption, and the cruise control makes driving an effortless exercise. The styling is timeless and the new Volvo remains one of the most beautiful cars on the road. I don’t care about depreciation, I will never sell my car! Volvo for life!

Volvo XC90 D5 SE (185bhp manual gearbox) 2006

Bought new in March 2006 and now at 77,000 miles in Dec ’09. Twice yearly trips from Scotland to Austria otherwise rural roads and town driving. Luxury pan-euro cruiser at 100mph+ on autobahn commands respect from other road users. Never used snow chains in Alps or Scottish winters as AWD simply pulls car anywhere (fitted with Pirelli Scorpion Ice & Snow winter tyres). 29mpg town / 35mpg rural / 39mpg at steady 70mph UK motorway. £210 / band F road tax. Faults have been rear wheel bearing (known fault replaced with enhanced units by dealer under warranty) & drop links. Otherwise reliable. Servicing costs pricey but dealer is best ever experienced - washes, valets car and dresses tyres for even the smallest of vists - swaps summer / winter tyres at no cost. Load lugger, takes 7 passengers (rear seats comfy up to about 45min journey for adults), super safe, fantastic drive. Power just about matched to car but avoid pre-2006 D5 smaller units (162bhp). Great car but make sure you have the budget to continue servicing & ownership!

Responses to this review

I agree with David Blattman... Volvo`s rock - johncharlesohara@msn.com for more info - Chas O’Hara from Dumbartonshire

Volvo V70 T5 SE 2001

This is my 3rd volvo, the first was a 760 GLE, which I thought was the best car i ever bought, the second a v70 2litre that was nice but underpowered, the T5 ticks all the boxes, fast comfortable and enjoyable, it runs my old 760 very close, so much so that I am keeping it for another few years, and that is going to cost me £2000 at the dealers to get it all up together, (it’s been stood for 6 months due to illness) simply superb car.

Volvo V50 1.6 D 2007

The very best car I’ve owned. Very good looking, comfortable for the whole family, including two teenage boys and the dog. No problems at all. Bought for the safety features and reliability; has not let us down. A very solid car, we live in the country and it has been a positive boon, through the snow and ice, mud, and fallen trees, this car is fantastic.

Volvo V70 ESTATE R DESIGN 2009

I have had my volvo estate V70 Diesel 2000 CC for 8 months now and find it fantastic for my disabled 4 wheel scooter in the back. I pull a caravan and don’t notice it on the back travelling at 65 to 70 mph with 37 to 42 mpg. With the leather black and white seats the comfort is great at the age of 65 year old with aches and pains we travelled to Devon with out a stop and after 4 plus hours never felt any aches or pains. We did the same journey in a Vauxhall Astra Sports 2006 model and I spent the next day in bed with a bad back. The only thing I should have had is auto then I could have a sleep when traveling ha, ha, (joking). It is the best car I have purchased, if I could give it a 10 star rating I would have but I could only give 5 stars and after too many cars to list this is the best. I had a bit of a problem with no hand brake but ok now.

Volvo S40 1.8 s 2001

A nice looking car. I’ve had it for 5 months and have done 5 thousand miles. The computer says the average fuel consumption on a long run is 42 miles to the gallon, with around town at 33 mpg. More than happy. I have had only 1 problem to date which is a noisy rear wheel bearing. It feels well screwed together with no irratating rattles. It has plenty of power when needed. The seats need a bit of time to set up to get comfortable. Very good road holding with the suspension set just right. I would put it on par with a Honda Accord. All in all a good alrounder with good safety equipment.

Volvo S40 2008

I’ve had the car from new for six months, in that time it has been back to the garage four times, the last time for six weeks. The car keeps shutting down and will either rev continually or will not go above 30mph. The car is dangerous and unreliable, you can not trust it. I would not recommend a Volvo to anybody. When the weather is cold it is pot luck if the car is going to start or not. I am very, very, disappointed with the car and when it happens again, which it will, I will seriously consider telling Volvo they can have the car back as it is not safe.

Volvo V50 DRIVe Stop/Start 2009

If versatility is your goal in a modern motorcar where you need a bit of pep to blow away the blues - qualified with a dash of sense that tells you you’re doing both the planet and your wallet good when you’re driving - you couldn’t do better than to entrust yourself to the new V50 DRIVe. small estate which is based on the Ford Focus - but is so much better buil and starting at £18660 it’s not bad value. It’s the perfect town and country adaptable package combining svelte Swedish lines with commodious estate-like capacity. You’ll feel like a saint driving it, knowing that it’s mpg and low carbon footprint are considerable enough, almost to convince you that you’re doing the planet a favour in owning such a machine. Solid as a Swedish Sunday underneath, its appearance is the epitome of good modern taste. You won’t find Flash Harrys and Harriets fighting over each other to own one of these. Instead, owners are likely to be well-grounded and sensible folk who don’t mind looking good, but eschew vulgarity. Contact with the road is provided by energy saving tyres that have a firm grip on today’s ecological agenda. If owning one of these cars won’t exactly give you the time of your life, it will fit in nicely with the life you are expected to lead in these times. It ticks all the boxes, while managing, at the same time, to box clever - so expect no flash but plenty of dash: verve with the Volvo twist, in other words. The interior is cleverly appointed to combine maximum security for occupants - a prime Volvo aim, of course, - with ergonomically pleasing and functionally comfortable automobile upholstery. It’s an airy cabin that is confidence inspiring and constantly reassuring and you can choose from a number of different trim spec. levels. Everything has substance, and, of course, there’s a five star safety rating. Belt and braces security is born of stability control systems to save the terminally incompetent from themselves and should you finally crash, there are more barrage balloons on board than were used to protect London in the Blitz. One marvel of this car is the combination of aerodynamic and aesthetic efficiency with load carrying capacity that’s adequate - if not huge (enough for all but the antique dealer and his grandfather clock, I suggest.). The eco systems function by switching the smooth and torquey 1.6 litre, 108bhp diesel engine off every time you stop - and being a Volvo you can guarantee it’s going to start up again without any hassle every time. `But surely performance is compromised and sacrificed on the altar of mean spirited money saving, celery eating, greenness. A chap can’t have his cake and eat it.` I hear you say. Well in this instance I’m pleased to report that it’s not, and you can. Driving it is a joy, and if you need to make rapid progress, the car is lively enough - cruising quietly and smoothly at high motorway speeds and zipping about on A and B roads if you need to. Low rolling resistance tyres, low friction transmission oil in the gearbox, lowered ride height, slippery aerodynamics, magic jiggery pokery mapping of the engine management and the ’stop/start system (Which can be switched off) all contribute to the frugality. The only doubt that lurks in the corner of my mind is ’how long will the starter motor and ring gear last?’ - but then since it’s a Volvo they’re probably made of some yet undiscovered metal that is harder than diamonds and will last forever. At this juncture I must tell you about a fifty-five mile Sunday bimble along twisty A roads and quiet country lanes. (The sort of trip that Trusty Trevor and Theresa would make to visit a National Trust property.). Never exceeding 60mph., but certainly not holding up traffic, the economy proved to be inter stellar. A mind disorientating 82.3 mpg showed on the trip computer! (My bicycle doesn’t do that). Immediately I telephoned my MP and instructed him to rush through a Bill consigning all hybrids to the dustbin. Volvo deserves a New Years Honour for producing such a good, solid, sensible - and enjoyable car. Volvo marketing and design people, over the years, have cleverly carved out a niche in the market. Not only that - among motor manufacturers they are indeed ahead of the game, because more than most companies, Volvo have proved themselves the rule makers and mould breakers. There’s nothing quite like a Volvo. Now - let me STOP praising the car and START enjoying driving it. Eco driving has never felt so indulgent.

Responses to this review

I used to run a much older Volvo estate. T’was a spacious and lovable wagon, which could have transported the contents of a small house within the commodious boot. Occasionally pressed into service as a rally "barge" it carried out its week end duties without a murmur through a wide variety of on and off road conditions and with approaching 180,000 on the clock,it finally went on in far more rugged hands than mine to be remembered for several years with affection by followers of MAT 1F. I would need to explore the potential of this latest version of a Scandinavian thoroughbred with a swift autobahn sortie to the Black Sea and back in seasonable spring time weather of course - Robert D Hall from Staffordshire

Syd, please,please tell me which road you did this bimble on as I would love to try it myself as apart from going down very long hills on the M62 I have yet to achieve any more than 55mpg in my drive. So much so that I am about to contact my MP and have a bill passed to BAN these disgracefully misleading mpg figures - Steve from Lincolnshire

Well written and witty - well done Syd. I’m just about to take delivery of a 2010 in SE Lux guise, all the toys and the economy to boot. I can’t wait - Steve from Scotland

Volvo V50 2.0D 2005

Nice looking car but too small. Handbrake gets in the way when changing gear and head rests impair view from rear window. Elec mirrors and windows sometimes fail to work but biggest problem is the fuel consumption. I’ve had the car for two months and am getting no more than 240miles form a full tank.

Responses to this review

I think you may have a problem with your car! I have a V50 2.0D and drive from Devon (Okehampton) to London (Surbiton) every week. I can do the round trip on a full tank (£45’ish). Thats on the A303 with cruise control at 80mph, (2200rpm). It may bw worth having it checked out - Henry Authers from Devon

I just brought a v50 20D 55 plate and have got a intermittent problem with the engine not pulling away. Have any owners had the same problem? If so what was it? And how was it cured? Mac Macfarlane from Devon

Volvo V50 1.6D S 2008

I chose this as a company car as I wanted more space and the styling of this estate is better than most in its price bracket. For a base model it is also well equipped, came with climate control, e/w windows all round etc. Chose the 1.6D as I thought it would be economical - I think Volov claim 56 mpg combined. I struggle to get above 45/46 mpg. I think the best I ever managed was 50 mpg when I first got it and ran it is an 60mph. I have pumped up the tyres to the ECO pressure of 36 psi and stick to 70-75 mph on the motorway which is 80 per cent of its mileage, but still the economy is rubbish and had I known, I would not have got it. Previously had a 1.9D Megane and on the same journey driving at higher speeds happily got 50 mpg. Only other problem was that the turbo needed replacing after about six months and I also find that the engine seems to hesitate quite frequently when on part throttle. If you are thinking about buying this for its claimed economy I would avoid it.

Volvo V50 2.0D SE Lux 2008

Second V50. Previously owned 2005 2.0D SE. When I set out to look for the replacement I tested Audi and BMW, but when it came down to it the Volvo beat them on price, value for money, specification, and safety features. Bigger mirrors of the revised car, a big improvement and heated/memory seats a great luxury. Overall, the drive is unexplainably better. The clutch is a bit heavy and the gear box a bit agricultural compared to some rivals, but this is a vice I am prepared to live with. No reliability issues from either car, though inexplicably the newer one averages 42mpg after 20 months, whereas the last car got about 47mpg. I drive the 136bhp C class diesel today and it was snail like in comparison. Support previous comments about problems with heater, read the instruction book, the air con system slightly complex, but good if you use it probably. Mill Volvo Sunderland - service excellent.

Volvo C30 1.6 R Design 2009

The car is gutless unless you put your foot to the floor; it is too low geared as well. 70 mph is 3200 rpm.

Volvo S60 d5 2004

This car is one of the most under rated cars on the road. I have returned 43 MPG over the time I have owned this car and it is all round about the town or fairly short journeys (up to 65 miles). The car is comfortable, easy to drive, responsive and can top 100 MPH in a blink of an eye and still has more MPH to offer. This car is coming up to 93000 on the clock and has never once let me down. The service programme on this Model is 18000 or 1 year, which ever comes quickest. My car is serviced by our local Volvo garage and the cost of services plus any parts which may be required from time to time are both in line with the rest of other cars in this range of vehicle. I have owned various makes of cars over the years and none of them are any where near the satisfaction I have had with this car. Next car to be owned - a Volvo S60 or 80 no need to even think about any other car.

Volvo XC70 XC70SE 2004

Good car for Company Director covering all of England and Wales with long commute, country living and two large dogs with luxury of Morgan 4 litre in garage plus third coupe car. I owned two previous Volvo’s in between a BMW X5, Mercedes C class estate, 2 Range Rovers and a Discovery and the XC70 (2004 - 2008). It proved the most practical of the lot. However it was off the pace with chassis development to the point of floating around bends making passengers sick. On motorways and A class roads taking me from my farmhouse near Ludlow to our country holiday home 850 miles away in Southern France; slushing down muddy lanes with me alone driving fine. But I opted for a Q7 when I retired a few months ago since it has the space for the dogs and more modern technology giving a far superior ride and engine. Pity. I liked Volvo’s.

Volvo V50 2.0 d e.s sport r design 2008

This is my second review, I bought the car new in Jan 2008 and fell in love with it immediately. The car is definitely a head turner, the ride is firm, the drive responsive and can be fast when you need it. I test drove both Audi and Saab and I must say the Saab came close to the Volvo but lost out on looks. I’ve had no problems with the car and the servicing package was a bonus, as Volvo servicing can be expensive. The down side, if there is one, is that the boot space is a bit on the small side. I’ve done just over 15,000 miles and I reckon it won’t be long before I need 2 front tyers at a cost of £160 each (ouch).

Volvo XC60 SE LUX D5 2009

The only problem I’ve encounted with my XC60 SE LUX D5 is with the battery. The car is only 1 week old, with delivery miles only on it, and now the battery has drained 1 of the cells and the car will not start!! The car will only start from a jump start, after calling volvo assistance out I was told that the CD player was draining the battery which is a 1st for me!! But apart from that it’s a beautiful car inside and out.

Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux 2008

A great car - very comfortable and well equipped, but let down by poor dealer service and low mpg. I would suggest avoiding the D5 and the auto gearbox.

Volvo S40 1.6d SE 2005

This car has a surprising amount of power and torque and has a very willing turbo with little lag. It drives smoothly in all gears and the engine management provides an even response while ticking over at low speeds in traffic. This makes it very tempting to play around in the gears with a gearshift that is positive and almost sporty, easily manipulated by your thumb and index finger. There’s definately no ’spoon in a bowl of porridge’ feel with this gear gate. Fuel consumption is a little dissapointing if you are expecting 60 mpg on all trips. This is only achievable on a very calm day at lower speeds. I have recorded 64 mpg at 64mph average from Watford to Exeter but have only managed that once. That does not mean though that you do not average between 50 and 55 mpg on a regular basis on the open road. City driving gives me an average 44 mpg return. Road Noise and wind noise is impressively low. Engine noise at low speeds is probably in line with most average small diesels, but at 70 mph it purrs along no different to my previous petrol driven car. As far as looks are concerned it still gives me a thrill even now when I walk towards it. That prowling nose lying low on the ground as you walk towards it is simply ’very impressive’. The side lines and the back of the car simply continue the symphony of design which few cars in it’s class have. It’s well worth letting it grow on you by dragging a deck chair a little closer, sitting down, and just looking at the lines....for a long time. The only complaint thus far is an irritating shock absorber rattle at low speed on a rough road. My milaege is 65,000 miles and I would have thought that suspension components on a modern car should do a bit better than that. So in summary I can only say that this has been one of my best buys, if not the best. So the next time you want to buy a car, spend some time admiring the S40 1.6d SE.

Volvo XC60 D5 AWD geartronic 2005

I also have a love hate relationship with my xc90. We also have the same problem with towing. Our engine service required is displayed in the dashboard when pulling our caravan, the car then goes into limp mode, however if the car is driven for another minute it will then disappear. No other lights or messages are displayed but I am starting to get worried and always think how much is this going to cost me. Mr Sherwood, did you get your car reprogrammed by the garage with him saying it was a software issue? And is it OK now? Our car did it again this weekend but with a full boot and 5 passengers - no caravan. Just seems to do it under heavy load. Can anybody give me advise? Thanks

Volvo V50 T5 2004

I absolutely love this car. I drive long distances and its smooth and comfortable and I get an average of about 34mpg; which isn’t too bad for a petrol. It’s also pretty quick, and you can surprise a few cars at the lights and roundabouts if you want. The overtaking is very good. It’s also proved to be very reliable, only trouble I had was a wheel bearing needed replacing after hitting a very big pot hole but that’s hardly Volvo’s fault. I was a bit sceptical of Volvo before I brought this car due to the image, but would definitely buy another one now, its such a quality car. Would like a go in a d5 as well now!!

Volvo XC90 D5 SE Geartronic 2006

At present I am in a love-hate relationship with my April 2006 XC90. I bought it at 3100 miles as an ex-demonstrator. Mileage now 25785. It is mainly used for towing a 17 foot caravan and it is the best towcar I have had in 40 years of caravanning. Towing mileage so far 6034. The car had its annual service as usual in April 2009. At 24856 miles (957 miles after service including 205 miles towing) while towing it suddenly displayed "Anti-skid service required" followed by "Engine service required urgent" and then went into limp mode. The engine management symbol was on. The car was recovered by truck to the supplying dealer who diagnosed "injector for No 4 cylinder not seated fully into unit and after clearing codes and road testing found the engine management light and then discovered a signal wire detached from block connector/housing - not fully in block connector. Resecured & tighten (sic) wire cleared codes and road tested. Vehicle OK". Last week the same sequence occurred with caravan on tow and we had to be trucked home 130 miles. Mileage from first breakdown 929 including 230 miles of towing. By the time we got home and it came off the truck the management light had gone out and an hour or so after that the message about engine service had also gone out. After some persuasion the dealer collected the car by truck, having no difficulty driving the car up the ramps. Their finding is now awaited. The car has otherwise performed well and took us on 1493 miles of towing in Iberia in 2007 and 1617 in France last year without problems. In 2008 while solo away from home we had similar displays but no limping and another dealer to which I immediately took it said there was a recall outstanding which the supplying and servicing dealer had not told me about. Something to do with software I was told. I bought the car for retirement and long term ownership but am now wondering whether I have to review my decision.

Responses to this review

Richard, Just had EXACTLY the same problem! Refusing to pay the £1k the main dealer/Volvo Uk want to charge me for a complete new loom. Local mechanic attempting a ’fix’. Happy to report results. Good luck - Jeremy from Gloucestershire

At 67,000 miles my vehicle went into limp mode whilst driving solo at 50mph. A cam follower had failed resulting in a new volvo engine costing £6,500!! I also tow - a 26ft twin axle caravan and until now it has towed very well. However, with the new engine, after around 40 miles of towing the car goes into limp mode with the same message as you are getting. 3 times I have been recovered and still no solution although they now suspect the turbo unit is faulty - another £1000+!!! How much more is this car going to cost me?? Is it time let it go?? Stuart Albutt from Worcestershire

Volvo V70 D5 2008

I am not really in Volvo’s target market being only 30 years old and preferring cars with a lot of get up and go. However I have been amazed by the V70 and can say its the best car I’ve owned to date. My reason for getting one was two rather large dogs (mine). It is a very confortable cruiser be it at 75mph where you get 40mpg, to a lot higher speeds should you want to use them. Like someone said before if you drive "enthusiastically" you will really have to try to get less than 32mpg. The seats are superb highly supportive and very comfortable. The fit and standard of kit is also excellent. The stereo is the best standard fit I’ve ever seen. Performance wise I would def go for the D5 or the T6 if you want any sort of decent performance feel. If your not bothered about this then by all means the other cars are worth it, but I feel somewhat underpowered. The D5 is mostly about straight line speed, through the corners its not bad, not lots of body roll but you don’t get the tweaked feel of the German marques. Load space is huge with the seats down, although quite shallow. There are some good built in tweaks like a built in dog guard, and something to stop your shopping moving all over the boot. Ok this car isn’t up there with the 530D in terms of prestige and performance and driving pleasure. That said I got such a ridiculous credit crunch lease deal that I would much rather have 85% of what the BMW is and save £250 p/m This car always makes me smile especially on motorway sliproads, where its performance is often underestimated by some unfortunate rep mobile. It is a bit of a sleeper....enjoy...

Responses to this review

I’ve had the car now for two and a half years and after repeated trips to the dealer to get problems sorted, I have finally changed the car for a year old Volvo XC70 with 13K on the clock. Guess what? Within three weeks of purchase, the car has been back to the dealers twice to get problems sorted and now the trim has started to fall off! Come on Volvo, get your act together! Wish I had purchased an Audi! - Sean Swindells from Mid-Lothian (Edinburghshire)

Volvo S80 D5 SE Sport. 2007

This might sound like a grumble but it’s not - it’s just my experience of an S80. I purchased this car from a Volvo dealer in Leeds. It was an ex Volvo company car, low mileage, one year old and test drove well. It is very high spec and well laid out. However, I’ve had lots of problems with it which has resulted in a complaint being made to Volvo UK customer services in Marlow. I’ve had: Chassis creaking when driving around corners (still there and ongoing for Volvo to determine the problem!) Ingress of water through the windscreen due to the top seal failing (twice). Nice when you drive around a corner to get a soaking when water pours through the centre console lights. Manufacturers fault with the in-car mobile phone unit which drains the battery within 96 hours (Volvo replaced under warranty) Poor fuel consumption - guess we have to live with it as Volvo reckon it’s OK. Wireless key fob loses contact with the car when inside it so you can’t do anything with the car (lock it, start it). (The way to fix this is to walk far away from the car for a few minutes), complete failure of the dashboard - just went into meltdown. (Volvo warranty repair). Satnav - failure of the media unit making it unusable (Volvo warranty repair). Failure of the horn/siren unit (warranty repair). Recall - heater problem that can cause fires (yikes) (recall repair). It’s a shame because otherwise it’s a real nice car. Would I buy another one ? Not unless I have a really good Volvo dealer on hand, Volvo RAC cover and the car is still well within warranty.

Volvo C70 2.4i sport 2006

I like this car! The handling & acceleration could be better but its not a sports car its a cruiser. Its good looking with the roof up & very good looking down!The sound system is fab, there is more airbags than a balloon race & enough cupholders not to get the silly cardboard one from maccies. My 6 year old son won’t let me change it as ’he is’ in charge of the roof button!The 5 cylinder engine sounds faster than it actually is if pushed (as the faster car overtakes). I’ve been through a set of front tyres as the car is very heavy and the no spare situation does worry me but I haven’t had to use the slime & pump supplied yet! The stoopid constant on Swedish headlights are annoying get them sorted on the service. A very nice compromise. First MOT due next week and I’ve stuck a private plate on to disguise the 06 age. So, looks like i’m a keeper!

Volvo V50 2008

To previous complainer , the throttle taking over engine revs is because you are in too high a gear and the anti stall device takes over. Gone are the days when the car would rattle and shake when you are in too high a gear as cars are so refined these days they compensate for almost everything. Most cars have this feature. As for your air/con try reading the hand book, all cars with air/con or climate control can have their heaters and air/con on together.

Volvo V50 2.0d r design 2008

Had it just over a year now, it is my first company car; didn’t know my boss had got me the r design until it turned up at the office. I was like a kid at Christmas! I drive around 35000 miles a year and it has been trouble free. I drive it quite hard and at 36000 it now needs its 2nd set of rear tyres and 3rd set of fronts. I get 42/44mpg when pushing on, the seats and headrests are fantastic when doing 400 miles a day. The only real niggle is the headlights/fuel filler release/fog light buttons have not survived the conversion to RHD; there is no dashboard light for the front fogs and the button is obscured by the steering wheel. I love the huge torque and have surprised faster cars a few times. I do find the DTSC gets in the way sometimes too. The space behind the floating dash is perfect for my man bag!!!! It looks good in black but is a bitch to keep clean. I would love to try a t5d... Overall I can’t complain... it’s free after all!

Volvo V70 1996

My last 3 cars were Volvo’s. My current 940 estate is now 13 years old with 254.000 miles. I have owned it since 1997. I have kept it in top condition by simply replacing whatever it needed. Most major parts are original. I have tried the V70s but they fail for me I am sorry to say and I am giving my car to my daughter who loves driving it particularly as it is automatic. Her children are safe in this car and of course have known it for years. For me the 940 was the last true Volvo so I am forced to look elsewhere and I will probably move over to the Ford’s. As you see I don’t agree with your statement that the V70 is the best wagon Volvo has ever built.

Responses to this review

I also have the 940 turbo estate. I bought it in 1997 and like the previous review have simply replaced parts as they failed or required renewing "tyres/brakes etc". It is in excellent condition though the sun roof started leaking some months back but is probably better for never being garaged. At 287,000 miles it runs and cruises almost as good as new. Its value on the market is somewhere between £500 and £1000 yet to me it is worth a great deal more. What can I replace it with? I tried the V70 some time back and it felt a lightweight after the 940. I have ruled out Mercedes and BMW estates as being grossly over-priced and expensive to service. Like your previous reviewer, if and when I finally part company with the 940 I simply cannot see another estate to match it. I’m like him, after owning mine for close on 14 years, it must be classed as the best all round estate ever made - Geoff Jones from Kent

Volvo S40 S40 D 2005

Sat here waiting for the car to be taken into the garage (again). To add to the problems of stalling at low revs; seat belt lights and buzzer coming on (this is alarming when in the outside lane of the motorway when the bing bing alarm goes of, and no nothing on the seat). That I sorted myself by unplugging the wiring loom under the seat and plugging it back in again, 3 visits to the garage and they can’t work that out. Best one was the interior light in the passenger footwell that would not turn off (when ignition on), they couldn’t see it!! I show the sales office manager, nearly stuck his nose in it "Oh I see! Really!!!!". Driving slowly, revs suddenly drop to 0 = stalls. Radio turned itsself up to full volume, then wouldn’t switch off; £789.36 for the 36,000 miles service!!!!! Really tired of Volvo treating me like a inconvenience; the best garage they had used to understand my queries, so what did Stratstone do? Close it!!!! It has now got to the point that I dare not go too far from home despite having breakdown cover, it is the hassle and stress of thinking - "Will it start this time after I stop?".

Volvo S40 2.0d SE 2008

I have had the car since June 2008, arriving with optional extras of leather seats, park distance and CD changer. I have already covered 21k miles and am approaching my second service. Only had one set of front tyres at 16k miles, with the rears set for 30k miles. The drive is assured, performance more than adequate and it provides a great blend of motorway and around the town driving that my previous vehicles failed to deliver. The badge carries some prestige, without the high costs of BMW’s and Audi’s..... My only concern is cost of servicing, and I am glad this is a company car. My 12.5k miles service (at 6 months old) cost £324, and all I had extra was some wiper blades. Overall I could not be happier, and I am already looking at my next Volvo for when my car gets changed at 60k miles.

Volvo C30 2.5 T5 R-Design SE Sport 2008

My C30 is a company car, and I do about 2,000 miles a month in it. Plus points: Extremely comfortable. Seats are great, very quiet at motorway speeds. Performance from the 2.5 petrol turbo engine is good, the high torque means that the engine will cope with a range of gears for any speed - it’ll pull in 6th from 35mph (try doing that in a diesel) and it has a lovely off-beat 5 cylinder warble to it when revved. Handling & grip are good without giving a hard ride.The looks are also good, especially with the R-Design kit and 18" wheels. There still aren’t many about so it does attract attention. Sound from the ’High Performance Audio’ option is excellent, and the Premium Dynaudio version is even better still. Overall build quality, inside and out is also good, which makes it a viable and more individual alternative to the default A3 choice in this area. Especially when you can get decent engines/lots of options for a similar price to a poverty spec A3 with a puny engine. Minus Points: Only 4 seats, boot is quite small. Fuel economy for this engine isn’t great - I get a 30mpg average but it will do 45mpg if you don’t mind sitting at 55mph. Dipped headlights aren’t the best, but there is a bi-xenon option. Overall. I’ll give it 5 stars as it fits my needs perfectly. Some people may score it down for practicality, but it’s not being sold on that basis and there are plenty of other cars that fulfil this need. It offers a good blend of performance and comfort - recommended!

Volvo XC90 D5 SE 2004

I too have had a love hate relationship with my XC90. Bought 02/2007 for £19,800 with about 50k on the clock. I love the look and practicality of the vehicle and the fuel economy is very good when you compare it to its peers. I have just passed 80k and have had the following faults in the last 30k miles. (1) wheel bearing failure at 65k cost £200 (a common fault it seems), (2) turbo module sensor failure at 70k cost £120, (3) this is the big one, I noticed an intermittent knocking noise coming from the front soon followed by what sounded like transmission whine. It turns out that the Transfer Box / Angle Gear has disintegrated and this is going to cost £1,200 ouch! Having read various blogs on the internet etc, these always seem to fail around the 60-60k mark, so I should have been prepared for it. I have also got through a set of tyres as they were all new when I bought the car cost £450. Is 30k for a set of tyres good? I am a bit disappointed with these failures on what is supposed to be a prestige car, but when you hear some of the horror stories about Landrover Discovery’s I guess you get off lightly being an XC90 owner. So if you are going to own an XC90 out of warranty make sure that you drive a good bargain when you buy the car and put the money you saved in the bank ready for some expensive repairs along the way!

Responses to this review

My 2001 Volvo XC70 has done over 180,000 km in a variety of terrains in South Africa. Until December 2009 I had had no problems whatsoever with the transfer box angle gear. That is, until I replaced the two tyres on the front wheels. I had Michellin 215/65R 16 tyres on all four wheels, having done 45,000 km by November. The treads on the rear wheels were still fine but I replaced the front tyres with Continental "4x4 Contact" tyres of the same size. In December I travelled 1,000 km down to the coast and the angle gear failed, costing me over R16,000 to replace in East London. On my way back to Johannesburg the angle box again failed! When the Volvo agant in Johannesburg examined the car he claimed that the failures were due to a difference in tyre circumference from front to back of 50 mm! That equates to 16 mm on the diameter or 8 mm on the radius! If this is such a critical aspect of the tyres, why does Volvo not highlight it in the Owner’s Handbook? Chris Hughes from South Africa

The angle gear ("Haldex clutch") failure is due to differing tyre circumference. Common on all earlier model AWD Volvo’s, it’s due to the transmission misreading the rotational speed of the tyres and constantly connecting in and out the drive to the rear end Haldex clutches presently go from series 1 through 4. These problems were eliminated by the development of the series 3 clutch, which preloads the rear axle at all timewith no less than 5% of the drives. Pre ’06 vehicles have the series 2 or 1 unit and you have to move the front tyres to the rear and vice versa every 5 to 10000 km’s. By the way, I have a 2007 XC90 D5 geartronic exec and love it... Roger Allen from Sweden

Volvo XC60 D5 SE Lux Geartronic 2008

The Volvo replaces my X3, which was a good car and reliable but had one serious failing ... the ’Sport’ set-up, with thin tyres, big wheels and the ability to jar ones spine running over a match stick. The Volvo is beautifully finished - vastly superior to the X3; the leather seats and ’oak’ floating switch panel make the plastics of the X3 look very cheap. With a softer ride - it is supremely comfortable; handling is positive and although a little slower than the X3, the 184 horses with the five cylinder engine do a sterling job! Well mated to the 6 speed automatic, the car has returned just over 30mpg overall (33 on a long run), which for such a solid 4WD machine, I find acceptable. Where the Volvo astonishes ... apart from its ’blind spot surveillance’ (brilliant!) ... its ’lane deviation warning’ (dips radio volume to chime a warning!) and the ’City Safety’ (as yet NOT checked out as my nerves are not up to it!) ... the intelligent cruise control which takes over control of accelerator and brakes, maintaining safe distance from the vehicle in front applying brakes or accelerating as required ... is a masterpiece of automotive engineering! It takes a while to gain confidence in this sophisticated system, but once one has trust in it ... amazing is an understatement! No faults in nearly 5000 miles; courteous dealers (who can show the BMW people how to treat a customer!) and a quality product, I commend this as a most excellent vehicle!

Volvo S40 2.0 Sport 2007

Very good, quiet, ultra reliable car. The 2.0 Sport model is a comfortable car to drive, good handling, plenty of power when needed with reasonable fuel economy. On long journeys the cruise control is a boon! The climate control "does what it says on the tin" and during this cold weather the defrost saves all that scraping! Two minutes and the windows from front to back plus mirrors are clear. The only thing that this car needs is a rear wash/wiper. (Volvo please take note.) These cars are not cheap but you only get what you can afford .(My previous car was an Alfa Romeo). All around, one of the best cars I have owned (so far). I look forward to driving it’s successor!

Volvo V70 D5 Geartronic 2008

Does everything remarkably well. Great long distance cruiser. Good economy. Quick and comfortable. Don’t let the badge put you off! This is a serious piece of metal.

Volvo V50 2.0D 2006

Has an intermittent problem with not starting. Doesn’t matter what the weather, time of day, even after a journey. Local Volvo dealer cannot find the problem. I’ve even tried using a different make of diesel.

Responses to this review

Hi there, I have (I guess) the same problem. Has anyone given you anything more sensible since writing your review? My V50 2006 2.0D has been in the garage for a total of 5 days (over 2 occasions). They have updated software and tinkered, but still have found no root cause (although I have to say their service is outstanding!!) I’m still getting in the car not quite sure if it will start, which is not a good feeling (especially doing 2.5K miles a month!) - Grant ’Equally Fedup’ from Dorset

Volvo V50 2 litre diesel estate 2008

Has anyone else found the car goes along at 20+ mph without your foot on the gas even uphill, also picks up speed going round corners so much so that I have to brake in the corner which is dangerous. I have had it into my dealer twice but they can’t find the fault on diagnostics and to be honest they do not really want to know. Also, the car steams up badly I can’t keep it clear unless I select the screen button which only works on aircon, then you can’t have the heating on as well, which in this weather is freezing. I am finding the fuel consumption poor - only getting approximately 38mpg on combined usage when statistics claim I should be getting 50+. I am so disappointed with it I am seriously thinking of getting rid, bought it for safety features but it’s the worst car I’ve had.

Responses to this review

But this is only because the service level is weak, it’s not even the fault of the brand, but it’s more around its very national management (obviously far away from Swedish and not only Swedish). It’s more about those "pseudo-technicians", totally unexperienced, not knowledgeable and absolutely not eager to learn (in many situations I went through, they even not have a capability to learn anything), I’m afraid - Andrei from Ireland

Volvo S60 2004

I have had many cars ranging from £500 -£100k and I have to say - this is the best car I have every owned. I get an easy 50 mpg - if only I knew earlier! I could have saved a small fortune. Not sure about the new 2008 Volvo’s, I am keeping mine for years - done 115k and still sounds like new.

Volvo XC70 2005

Get your wheel bearings tested. Appears to be a common fault. I have had 3 out of the 4 changed. Warranty team will try and tell you it is wear and tear!!

Responses to this review

I have a 3.5 year old (purchased from new) XC70 with only 36,000 miles on the clock and the front wheel bearings are having to be replaced. Can we expect Volvo to cover this, even though it is out of warranty? Any advice welcome - Ken Ferguson from England

Volvo V50 2.0d r design se sport 2008

One of the best mid range car I’ve ever drove - comes with loads of extras - also came with a good service package. The car looks the biz . Test drove the A4 - the car was not a patch on the Volvo. Just one down side - I would have liked badges on the back to let people behind know what the car is.

Responses to this review

Maybe I should start writing multiple reviews to artificially inflate the average review stars for a car which is quite obviously garbage. I came on here to look at subjective views to gain an overview on Volvo reliability. Just because you don’t agree with everyone else’s opinion doesn’t give you the right to keep writing 5 star reviews now does it? You like YOUR car, we get it! - Harry Hill from England

Volvo S80 S80 T6 2001

Impeccable build quality and restrained elegant styling. Deceptively quick and the twin sequential turbos are unobtrusive but give an immediate seamless power boost when most needed. Although only front wheel drive the car is sure footed and forgiving. No appreciable road or mechanical noise. A horrible fiddly sat nav system that is little used but superb comfort thanks to the best front seats in the business. A brilliant sound system and a great feeling of security and insulation from a noisy dangerous world. Space saver spare maybe OK in Europe but not sensible for Australia.The range of steering wheel and front seat adjustment guarantees long distance comfort and enables an all day drive of 600 miles to end with a fresh arrival at a restaurant for dinner. Later model has much needed rear parking sensors.

Volvo V50 D5 2.4 185bhp SE Sport R-Design 2008

Forget the T5 version and certainly don’t bother with the 2 litre engines or the even smaller ones, this is the one to have for sure! With the R-Design spec and the 18" wheels, as well, it’s transformed as ’a looker’ too. Brilliant mid-range acceleration, this will cruise all day and return mid 40s consumption at a steady (illegal) 85 on the motorway. Off the lights it’ll leave much more fancied German machines for dead and all from a wonderfully warble-y 5 cylinder engine. Sure it mightn’t handle through the bends quite as well as some of the Germans but it’ll leave them for dead on the straights and having had Audi Avants (A6s and A4s) in the past you won’t need to spend a fortune on osteopath bills to sort out your jarred bones either! I reckon these are the bargain of all bargains.......

Responses to this review

Just about to buy one. I had the 2.0 se sport for three years. What do you get to the gallon on average when driving quite hard around town? Many thanks - Jerry O’Shea from Nottinghamshire

Volvo XC70 D5 2008

Bought the D5 SE Lux back in March 2008 - and have since clocked up 8000miles in this faultless family wagon. It easily swallows up all the luggage that is needed for a family of four on a weekend away and carries us all in ’BMW’ like comfort with leather, Air Con, and many many more home comforts as standard. The D5 mpg is good for a car of that size and weight - 30mpg urban and 39mpg motorway. Recommended.

Volvo S60 D5 SE 2003

I bought this car when I changed jobs that required me to travel up and down motorways. Having owned a BMW 525 (petrol) previously, this was my first exposure to an ’oil burning’ diesel. I have now driven the car over the past 2 years completing over 40,000 miles and can honestly say I have enjoyed every mile! The Volvo eats miles with ease, and easily delivers 48-51 mpg even at 85mph+. Comfort is second to none, with plenty of power and performance for anyone. The previous owner had every extra possible fitted, (sports pack, winter pack, comms pack etc etc) My dilemma now is trying to find a car as comfortable, with equal performance and with as many ’toys’ as a company car, but unfortunately Audi A8’s BMW’s 7 series and Merc ’E’ classes do not make my available list. The mileage at present is 108,000 and in my experience is only just ’broke-in’ as it still drives fantastic! As previous comments have listed, the only down side is the turning circle. (I have 18" alloys") How can this exceptional car only now be worth £4 - 5K? I nearly forgot to mention, the Dolby surround sound hi-fi - my daughter thinks its even better than her iPod and I must agree, the noise is stunning. Having written these comments, I think I’ll keep her... sod the Volkswagen company car option! Tony.

Volvo C70 D5 2007

Yes, it looks great (like the wide shoulders of the car), and it puts a smile on your face looking at it and sitting in it. That is until you start the engine, which makes you check the diesel van next to you, and then you realise there is no diesel van next to you. The archaic sound comes from the stylish, sleek car you’re in! And corners are nerve breaking too. Somehow Volvo has managed to turn a very good chassis (same as Ford Focus) into a nervous, understeering and vague car that leaves you feeling disappointed. The springs and dampers don’t match, the steering feels dead and vague. It also shows the lack of rigidity of the body: probably that’s why the springs are softer than is good for the weight of the car. The autobox is probably the worst I have ever experienced (feels the same as my old 850 T5R): slow in response and not fluid enough. The turbolag of the D5 means that driving is much less relaxed than it should be: pulling away or accelerating means anticipating and often results in traction issues due to the delay in throttle response. The two rear seats are comfortable and usable for 2 adults, but with the roof down only below 30 mph. All in all: nice looking car, premium feel, but don’t expect it to drive well if you like agile, responsive and nimble cars.

Volvo S40 T5 Sedan 2008

The 2008 Volvo S40 T5 is currently for me, a British Columbia, Canada owner, Volvo’s best offering. It is the most nimble, easy-to-park,economical, and space-efficient model of the four Volvo’s I have owned since 1982. On a long trip(such as a recent 2300km inter-provincial one which I took in June) the car’s comfortable seats, quiet air-conditioning, unflappable suspension, and fine gasoline mileage(37mpg) made it an outstanding vehicle for long-distance travel. Its sun roof made it a great platform from which to view the snowy peaks of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Around town it carries out errands( at least so far) with out faltering. No vehicle is perfect. I would like to see a more accessible glove box, an improved jack handle, and a better coin holder. Reflective safety triangles on the doors and reflective tape on the front and rear bumpers should be in place as on earlier Volvo’s. Volvo Canada has a winner in this little car and should do more to promote it in this country.

Volvo S60 D5 SE 2003

Lets get the bad point out of the way... the turning circle is large especially with 17 ins wheels. It can be a pain in tight car parks. You reverse into parking slots never drive in. Small town driving in France and Italy can present a challenge. This is a great car; not just good. It sits in the drive with a Brand new Merc C Class and do you know it’s the better car in many ways. It is a true long hauler giving 48mpg when new and now after 74K 53mpg. Drive the motorways at 60 mph and it returns 63mpg - that’s about 1000 miles on a tankful of diesel. (Manual Gearbox of course) The D5 engine is truely powerful with heaps of torque over a flat range. At 80mph there is still bags of acceleration left so the published 0-60 times really don’t do the thing justice. Suspension is softish , the seating like old armchairs and the drivers position as near ideal as I’ve found. Instruments and controls are perfectly positioned although the handbrake takes a little getting used to. I love this car so much that I’m keeping it. It is easily good for another 100k. One thing to watch for is Volvo servicing and parts cost. Volvo now seem to think they’re the prima donna marque even outpricing MB and BMW. Depreciation is high so unlike me , don’t buy new.

Volvo S40 2.0D 2005

I’d just like to counter the ’low miles’ review above - three years and 80,000 miles later, this car is still tight as a drum. Averaging 50mpg on my motorway commute, leather just getting really comfortable now it’s worn in nicely! No engine problems except for the EGR valve - a common problem on all [Ford/Peugeot group] 2.0 diesels, usually an early/warranty failure if it’s going to go - mine was. Only fault was the CD autochanger failed just out of warranty - goodwill payment from Volvo; parts are expensive, however [no different from BMW, Audi, Alfa etc]. Don’t worry about the diesel engine - proven to be good for hundreds of thousands of miles if respected [oil changes/servicing etc.] Safety second to none, leather the best in the business, cruise as standard, a decent drive on 17"alloys, floating console a design classic. Prestige branding without looking like you’re in a company car; a nice sight on the motorway, different to the usual 3series/A4 middle-manager repmobiles. Looks less fussy than the Jag X type, more mature than a Focus or Golf.. If you’re after a leftfield choice, an Apple to everyone else’s PC, then it’s this, the Saab 9-3, or the Lexus 220.

Volvo XC90 2004

D5 SE all-wheel drive. Bought 2nd hand 2006 with 16k on the clock from a main agent. Fitted with the complete options list. All bells and whistles. Bargain. Recall for steering bushes inspection but all ok. Snag list some chrome strip coming away and the small speaker on the inside of the front passenger window window came off. All fixed free. Locking system went on strike for no reason which the agent fixed Now 35,229 miles. Very happy. Very comfortable. Fuel consumption on around and about local roads and town, 35 mpg (diesel). Motorway 45-48 at steady 60 mph. Drop it to average 50 mph and it will return 55 mpg. Have had six largish family plus luggage on board for 100 miles with only minor groans but they were distracted by movies on the seat screens. screens Regular servicing with main service at 12,600 and an oil/filter change at halfway. Good investment. No mechanical problems. Tyres have lasted 25,000 miles but then I do so before the regulations say and keep careful watch on pressures. Two had to be changed with deep cuts at 10,000 miles. Possible malicious. Excellent for long distance. Brake pads long lasting but I use Geartronic for braking mainly. One unhappiness is the rear brake discs rusting and having to be replaced. Watch out for changing down using Geartronic. It is possible to go to 1st at too high a speed and I suspect that will do the transmission no end of harm. Servicing is a bit pricey but you do get the feeling that is has been done well and servicing staff will answer your questions and provide explanations. Only problem. The Government VED bands that do not relate to real life.

Responses to this review

The 6000cd does not have aux in - Martin Jones from Essex

Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux 2008

I can’t understand the previous guys statement about the car being unstable (!) - he must work for BMW/Audi/Merc as Volvo don’t make "unstable" cars. Safety is their middle name. Anyway let me share my thoughts. 1st of all I should point out that my last car was a 2006 BMW M3 Cabriolet and prior to that I flirted with an Audi A4 1.8t Cabriolet (plus I’ve owned MX5’s and other cabriolets). I was very very sceptical about spending my hard earned cash on a top of the range Volvo as I’m not exactly in what i would call Volvo’s demographic (I’m not retired/over 50 or what you would call sensible). Having owned and driven many thousands of miles in the usual German crop of sports cabriolets I’d convinced myself that their typically hard ride, high fuel consumption and ridiculous running/servicing costs of these cars was normal and acceptable. Having owned my D5 SE Lux spec C70 now for 3 months and racking up 4k miles all I can say is that you really can have your cake and eat it - the car will manage 35-40mpg to the gallon (never less than 32 even when driven like you’ve stolen it) it also has THE best seats I’ve ever parked my backside on and has a stereo thats so audiophile perfect you’d think you were listening to the artist live. Couple all this with the fact it’s got a folding hard roof, looks a million dollars and doesn’t come with the cabrio BMW/Audi/Mercedes stigma and you have a winner. Take my word for it having spent far too much money on cars in the past. The C70 is the best looking, most comfortable, most economical, best riding, best equipped 4 seater cabrio available.

Volvo V70 C70 T5 SE 2006

Had the car 6 months now, and its great. Ours has 17" wheels, and doesn’t tramline at all (we had a BMW that did!), so it does not appear to happen to all cars. Most annoying thing would be when the windows wind down, any water on the roof falls on you. Radio is superb.

Volvo XC90 D5 Executive 2004

My wife had wanted an XC90 for some time and we finally got around to buying this one second hand, two years old, in March 2007. We both enjoy driving it, particularly the handling and the driver position, but have been disappointed by the lack of space - we have 3 grown-up kids - particularly with the two seats at the very rear, which would just about accommodate two young children comfortably. In the first row of rear seats we can only get two of ours in comfortably as a third in the middle inevitably ends up with his or her knees up under their chin. Running costs have been very high. So far in one year we have had to replace all 4 tyres, the two rear brake discs and now we have the start of what sounds like a failing wheel bearing in one of the front wheels (the rear wheel bearings had been replaced by the dealer before we bought it as part of a recall) and of course the warranty has just expired! There are a number of reports online both here in the UK and USA of XC90 wheel bearings failing at an alarming rate, which is VERY disappointing in a car of this supposed quality. Nothing associated with servicing or repairs has been anything but expensive, even going to a local independent garage. As much as we enjoy the car we are becoming increasingly concerned about the reliability and it is not what we would have expected from a high-end Volvo. My wife previously owned a V70 turbo which she ran for 8 years up to 85K miles without any real issues.

Volvo S60 2.4 DSE 2005

My 2nd S60 - great value, fantastic comfort, excellent kit (leather, 6CD and other goodies), brilliant fuel economy @ 51 mpg

Volvo XC90 Se D5 2003

We have a love/hate relationship with our XC90. We love the build, reasonable fuel consumption, comfort and space. We have, however, been plagued with problems. The first and most serious was a complete engine and gear box melt down whilst driving in France. We were flabbergasted that a car of this calibre and cost should suffer such fundamental failure at 51,000 miles and less than 4 years old (just outside warranty - arghhh!) We have also recently had suspension bushes replaced and the drive shaft imploded last week at 60,000 miles! Is this normal? Volvo tell me ’well it is quite an old car’ Well our Audi is even older at 11 years and we have never (touch wood) experienced such major failures. Perhaps we are foolish but we do intend to buy a new XC90, we are hoping that we are just very unlucky and bought a ’Friday’ car. We have looked at alternatives and feel that there is nothing else out there that offers the same space and style. We have 3 young children and 2 dogs so appreciate the large boot and 7 seats. We will however ensure we sell before the warranty expires!

Responses to this review

You must be mad to buy another Volvo. The dealer kept on saying I had a serious oil leak from engine - estimate £2k (nothing wrong with it - just some oil oversplash from filling at service). On to my second gearbox at 90k, computer now totally collapsed, air bag failure notice etc. Sat-nav completely useless, goes through tyres at a rate of knots. Every time I get in it, I wonder if I am going to make my destination. Green Flag recovery almost on speed dial. On the plus side, it is comfortable but then so is the tow truck I spend most of my time in. JUST KEEP CLEAR OF VOLVO - Derek Price from Carmarthenshire

Volvo C70 se lux d5 2007

Car is very unstable on any uneven road surface. My model has 18" wheels as standard and Volvo admit they cannot fix the problem. Therefore they are saying they are producing a model that "tramlines" dangerously. It’s not just my car, it is ALL C70 models with wheels over 16". Unbelievable but true! This is a good car in all other respects but it spends more time in the air than on the road surface. If you like a steering wheel that is jerking all over the show, buy this car.

Volvo S60 S60 R 2000

I bought the S60 R when it first came out in 2003 and it has given me five years of trouble-free motoring. When people think of reliability it is normally the German brands BMW, Audi and Volkswagen that come first to mind but I think that this doing Volvo a disservice, they fully deserve to be mentioned alongside them. The S60 is as comfortable on the motorway as it is in the towns and villages. If you want good fuel economy then you should choose the diesel option. It is surprisingly enjoyable to drive, performance and handling are very good. Interior and exterior show great attention to detail.

Volvo S60 S70 1997

Mine is the S70 with 146k on the clock, runs so smooth, safe and goes like the wind this is my 8th Volvo. Wouldn’t have any other!

Volvo C30 1.6 S 2007

This is the first Vovo I’ve owned as I’ve always been put off by its ’boring but safe’ image but this is a really nice car and not boring at all to drive. It’s only a 4 seater so may not suit everyone but it suits us perfectly as a work and family car and is cheaper than the Audi A3 but built on the same spec. The wife really likes the interior and I have to say it is very comfortable and uncluttered. Far from finding the safety features boring (now I have a 8 month old) they are very reassuring - we have taken the option of the ’Magic Eye Mirrors’, which at £350 weren’t cheap but I think money well spent as my wife has always been nervous before about motorway driving but as these mirrors light up when someone is in your blind spot she’s a lot more confident. Running costs are extremely economical and all in all I think this is a very good choice if you’re looking for a family car with a bit of a difference.

Volvo XC70 2003

I purchased a second hand XC70 from a Volvo dealer a few weeks ago. The vehicle was tested on what now appears to be smooth road, and no test was made on any other road surface. I am now somewhat appalled at the road noise, even a very low speeds, i.e. less than 5 miles per hour, the dealer stated that this was normal? I can’t believe that Volvo would produce a vehicle that has this very marked ’fault’, would others respond and give views.

Volvo V70 2.0 SE 2007

I’ve had my V70 for 6 months now and I’m very pleased indeed with it’s performance. It’s everything you would expect of a Volvo, solid, safe and reliable but I think it’s anything but boring. There are not many cars that I have driven that I would give 5 stars to but this one really does deserve the highest praise.

Volvo V70 V70 2.4D 2008

I’m delighted with my new V70. The fit and finish puts many more expensive cars to shame. The 2.4D is economical, yet has more than enough, smoothly delivered, power to cruise at 80-90mph. It’s no "hot hatch" in handling terms, but, then again, why should it be....

Volvo V70 d5 s geartronic 2003

Great economy, great performance, enough toys, quiet enough for 500 mile days, inoffensive Bad points, poor turning circle, poor rear legroom, low height of tailgate when open (I’m only 5’8") slightly soggy handling (I should have paid more for the sports suspension) This is my fourth Volvo estate, I’m looking for another because I can’t find anything that does the job better at a sensible price.

Volvo XC90 se d5 geartronic 2004

Excellant car would have got 5 stars except for recalls and part failures Wishbone replaced under recall. Wheel bearings collapsed at 20,000 miles (scary) Ignition lock failed on a car that is just over 3years old with just 28,000 miles done was told wear and tear .First time ever this has happened to me with nearly 30 years motoring behind me my 20 year old ford cortinas ignition lock never failed strange. interior trim falls to bits. Steering Rack failed at just over 3 years old and 26,000 miles was told pot holes would cause this god help me if i ever took it off road. this happened on my ford at 19 years old and 180,000 miles. TV/DVDs stopped working replaced under warrenty. fuel economy good for a big car 25 to 30 mpg

Volvo V50 V50 1.6D SE 5dr

Cheers: Fuel efficient Comfortable Flexible The total economy makes it a good buy. Jeers: Overpriced Comments: The most environmental Volvo so far beside the C30 1,6D. It’s easy to get a brief overview, easy to reach and easy to use the buttons, they are accessable and approachable. There’s been a lot of talk about the cup holders and where to storage junk but hey isn’t it like that if you don’t have anywhere to storage it, it wont be left there. Overall , it’s exactly what I had expected where fuel consumption, station-wagon,environmental awareness and the overall total economy were my top issues. I went from a petrol driven VW Golf III 1,6 -03 to the brand new Volvo V50 1,6 Diesel and SAVED about a ? 50 a month (I drive long distances). This was one of my best car buys I’ve done. If I wasn’t in need of a station wagon (my dog) I’d go for the C30 1,6D Efficiency that comes out this spring and save even more money. But unfortually that car is too small for us. I will for sure test drive it though and see what I will miss.

Volvo V50 1.6D 2006

I like the car very much to be this small engine and low consuming it is nice to drive. BUT several 3times noe the engine have suddenly lost power during driving. the engine dont rev over 2800rpm and max speed is around 60kph The volvo dealer have not been able to trace the error and complain that it is so hard to investigate due to that the error is gone when they recive the vehicle. Problem is temporarly gone when when cykle the ignition - and workshop are never open in the evenings or hollidays when it happens. please could anyone with similar problem send the VIN number so I can Investigate what the solutions have been for your cars d.andersson@hrmritline.se

Volvo C70 2.4 T 2dr 2005

I’ve had this car 12 months and it’s a blinder! I would never have considered a Volvo before but this is something special. It drives like a dream and has all the comfort you would expect from a far more expensive car. They’ve stopped producing these now, which is a shame but definately worth getting second hand like mine. A very classy car.

Volvo V70 2.5 T 2007

Everything you expect from a Volvo, practical, safe and spacious but not exciting.

Volvo S60 2.4 D5 2007

Proof that Volvo can produce an attractive car. Excellent, reliable engines and solidly built.

Volvo V70 2.4D5 SE Sport 5dr 2007

I am very pleased that I chose this Estate. It has very comfortable and supportive seats, which my wife finds very comfortable as she has a bad back. It is a lovely car to drive and once you get used to there being no handbrake (you find yourself grabbing for it and finding thin air, which can be disconcerting at first) you soon get used to the fact it’s electronic. Very spacious and of course it’s a very safe car to be in. Very well designed all round.

Volvo XC90 2007

My XC90’s ride quality is very soft and smooth. Visibility is good and the high seating position means it feels safe. The boot is massive, the fuel economy not too bad. As with all Volvo’s - it’s as safe as houses.

Volvo V50 1.6D SE 5dr

Reliable, safe and pratical, as you’d expect from a Volvo. The V50 is a lot better looking than most Volvos and has some nice sporty details inside. Great to drive and handles perfectly. I’m extremely pleased with this car. I’m only giving it 4 out f 5 because there is a little more engine noise than I would like but I wouldn’t say it’s intrusive. Very good car.

Volvo C30

A less common alternative to the Audi A3. Nice to drive.

Volvo S80

My Volvo has excellent handling, nice dashboard layout & comes with a good spec, but is quite bumpy & not really that well refined. Quite cheap to buy as a 2-3 year old car.

Volvo XC90 3.2 SE

The 7 seats makes this off-roader perfect form my extended family. Both the interior and the exterior are built to last and are built using quality materials. This a quality 4x4 and Volvo have got everything spot on. The steering column can be adjusted for comfort and the car offers a pleasant ride with the minimum of noise. The only reason I have not awarded the XC90 5 stars is due to the fuel economy which is not the best at arounf 20mpg.

Volvo XC70 2.4 DS SE Lux 5dr

I do some hefty motorway mileage both for work and personally so I wanted something I could do it in in real comfort and having 3 kids safety was paramount. This is a fabulous car and the safety spec is second to none. Very comfortable drive and massive amount of space. Excellent.

Volvo S40 1.6D SE

Good looker however not completely free from its faults The 1.6d would have not been my first choice however this was company car, and so the tax was considerably low for a car in its class. The 1.6d is quite refined an I am impressed by the engine management as Volvo seem to know how to get the best performance from a small diesel engine.. The main problem is that I don’t think Volvo planned the S40 1.6d to be a high miler. My car is a 56 plate, Nov 06, and it now as 27000 on the clock. There seems to be a issue with the intercooler as mine was replaced at 20000 miles. Maybe the turbo’s working overtime to get the best out of the 1.6d?. The annoying thing with this car is that, should the cars on board computer detect the slightest fault, this will take over and limit the cars performance. Should this occur the car would only do a maximum of 60mph on a flat road, reducing to about 30-40mph even on a slight incline and is not ideal when away on business! This happened 3 times until Volvo finally replaced the intercooler. The air con has also stopped working which, has been addressed by Volvo however, 3 visit to the garage later the air cons still not working! My colleges have also had issues with the 2ltr petrol, as they seem to cut out and having said this, one of my college had the contract ended early as he claimed the cars was not fit for purpose due to on going problems with the loss of power. Overall, I wouldn’t really suggest the s40 as a fleet car however, problems do happen and having driven the S40 2.4i SE, this is the model I would recommend however, only for low mileage users!

Volvo XC90 D5 SE

Excellent quality, wonderful to drive. This car is fantastic on long journeys with the children and full of luggage.

Volvo XC90 Vovlo XC90 D5 SE

If you are looking for a family car with high comfort and that is exceptional to drive, look no further. This car is so well thought out I really can’t think of a single thing to mark it down. 10 out of 10, well done Volvo.