Volvo
Saturday, 4th of July 2009
Polls
Search
Volvo Road Test Reports And Car Reviews
Volvo C30 Full Road Test Report
DRIVe 1.6D - Volvo’s existing, highly efficient 1.6 litre turbo diesel engine has been retained to power the DRIVe model range. With an impressive 64.2mpg from a sports coupe, Volvo have certainly grabbed the mark... read more
Volvo S40 Full Road Test Report
1.6D DRIVe - The Volvo S40 is an elegant saloon the features excellent build quality and safety. The performance is spirited and the handling is precise. Volvo’s strong residuals and the impressive fuel economy of... read more
Volvo XC60 Full Road Test Report
2.4-litre diesel - This vehicle stops you from hitting cars, which are directly in front – pure sci-fi? Actually it’s not. The boffins have developed a Crossover, that uses the latest technology to keep you as safe as... read more
Volvo C30 Full Road Test Report
1.6D R-Design Sport - Swedish maker has upped the ante with its latest hot hatch - the Volvo C30 R-Design. It certainly is a good-looking car the bodykit includes a roof spoiler, alloy wheels and unique R badging. Our test... read more
Volvo C70 Full Road Test Report
2.4 Geartronic SE - The drive with this engine really was effortless and combined with the automatic gearbox was a very relaxing experience.... read more
Contact Michael Taylor at Cambria Vehicle Services Ltd on 01342 859400 or email Michael.higginbottom@summitcontracthire.co.uk
Have your say!
Volvo lease prices 
Volvo new cars and nearly new cars
Volvo road tests and customer reviews. Submit your own Volvo review, read other driver's opinions or visit the best road test web sites available on the web.
Volvo XC90
Average driver rating ( based on 9 reviews )
Volvo V70
Average driver rating ( based on 9 reviews )
Volvo V50
Average driver rating ( based on 8 reviews )
Volvo S60
Average driver rating ( based on 7 reviews )
Volvo S40
Average driver rating ( based on 6 reviews )
Volvo XC70
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
Volvo C70
Average driver rating ( based on 3 reviews )
Volvo C30
Average driver rating ( based on 3 reviews )
Volvo S80
Average driver rating ( based on 2 reviews )
Volvo XC60
Average driver rating ( based on 1 review )
Volvo Consumer Car Reviews
The latest Volvo driver reviews and road test reports. The views expressed do not reflect the thoughts and opinions of ReallyGoodDomains.com
Submit a Volvo road test report
Simon Clements, Bedfordshire
Volvo V50 2.0d r design 2008
Had it just over a year now, it is my first company car; didn’t know my boss had got me the r design until it turned up at the office. I was like a kid at Christmas! I drive around 35000 miles a year and it has been trouble free. I drive it quite hard and at 36000 it now needs its 2nd set of rear tyres and 3rd set of fronts. I get 42/44mpg when pushing on, the seats and headrests are fantastic when doing 400 miles a day. The only real niggle is the headlights/fuel filler release/fog light buttons have not survived the conversion to RHD; there is no dashboard light for the front fogs and the button is obscured by the steering wheel. I love the huge torque and have surprised faster cars a few times. I do find the DTSC gets in the way sometimes too. The space behind the floating dash is perfect for my man bag!!!! It looks good in black but is a bitch to keep clean. I would love to try a t5d... Overall I can’t complain... it’s free after all!
Submitted: 22/06/2009 12:03:47
Geoff Jones, Surrey
Volvo V70 1996
My last 3 cars were Volvo’s. My current 940 estate is now 13 years old with 254.000 miles. I have owned it since 1997. I have kept it in top condition by simply replacing whatever it needed. Most major parts are original. I have tried the V70s but they fail for me I am sorry to say and I am giving my car to my daughter who loves driving it particularly as it is automatic. Her children are safe in this car and of course have known it for years. For me the 940 was the last true Volvo so I am forced to look elsewhere and I will probably move over to the Ford’s. As you see I don’t agree with your statement that the V70 is the best wagon Volvo has ever built.
Submitted: 10/06/2009 09:26:08
Brian Wilkinson, Lancashire
Volvo S40 S40 D 2005
Sat here waiting for the car to be taken into the garage (again). To add to the problems of stalling at low revs; seat belt lights and buzzer coming on (this is alarming when in the outside lane of the motorway when the bing bing alarm goes of, and no nothing on the seat). That I sorted myself by unplugging the wiring loom under the seat and plugging it back in again, 3 visits to the garage and they can’t work that out. Best one was the interior light in the passenger footwell that would not turn off (when ignition on), they couldn’t see it!! I show the sales office manager, nearly stuck his nose in it "Oh I see! Really!!!!". Driving slowly, revs suddenly drop to 0 = stalls. Radio turned itsself up to full volume, then wouldn’t switch off; £789.36 for the 36,000 miles service!!!!! Really tired of Volvo treating me like a inconvenience; the best garage they had used to understand my queries, so what did Stratstone do? Close it!!!! It has now got to the point that I dare not go too far from home despite having breakdown cover, it is the hassle and stress of thinking - "Will it start this time after I stop?".
Submitted: 28/05/2009 09:09:57
Mark Cady, Cardiff
Volvo S40 2.0d SE 2008
I have had the car since June 2008, arriving with optional extras of leather seats, park distance and CD changer. I have already covered 21k miles and am approaching my second service. Only had one set of front tyres at 16k miles, with the rears set for 30k miles. The drive is assured, performance more than adequate and it provides a great blend of motorway and around the town driving that my previous vehicles failed to deliver. The badge carries some prestige, without the high costs of BMW’s and Audi’s..... My only concern is cost of servicing, and I am glad this is a company car. My 12.5k miles service (at 6 months old) cost £324, and all I had extra was some wiper blades. Overall I could not be happier, and I am already looking at my next Volvo for when my car gets changed at 60k miles.
Submitted: 26/03/2009 10:06:53
Chris Chitty, Lincolnshire
Volvo C30 2.5 T5 R-Design SE Sport 2008
My C30 is a company car, and I do about 2,000 miles a month in it. Plus points: Extremely comfortable. Seats are great, very quiet at motorway speeds. Performance from the 2.5 petrol turbo engine is good, the high torque means that the engine will cope with a range of gears for any speed - it’ll pull in 6th from 35mph (try doing that in a diesel) and it has a lovely off-beat 5 cylinder warble to it when revved. Handling & grip are good without giving a hard ride.The looks are also good, especially with the R-Design kit and 18" wheels. There still aren’t many about so it does attract attention. Sound from the ’High Performance Audio’ option is excellent, and the Premium Dynaudio version is even better still. Overall build quality, inside and out is also good, which makes it a viable and more individual alternative to the default A3 choice in this area. Especially when you can get decent engines/lots of options for a similar price to a poverty spec A3 with a puny engine. Minus Points: Only 4 seats, boot is quite small. Fuel economy for this engine isn’t great - I get a 30mpg average but it will do 45mpg if you don’t mind sitting at 55mph. Dipped headlights aren’t the best, but there is a bi-xenon option. Overall. I’ll give it 5 stars as it fits my needs perfectly. Some people may score it down for practicality, but it’s not being sold on that basis and there are plenty of other cars that fulfil this need. It offers a good blend of performance and comfort - recommended!
Submitted: 19/03/2009 09:59:10
Mark Sutton, Leicestershire
Volvo XC90 D5 SE 2004
I too have had a love hate relationship with my XC90. Bought 02/2007 for £19,800 with about 50k on the clock. I love the look and practicality of the vehicle and the fuel economy is very good when you compare it to its peers. I have just passed 80k and have had the following faults in the last 30k miles. (1) wheel bearing failure at 65k cost £200 (a common fault it seems), (2) turbo module sensor failure at 70k cost £120, (3) this is the big one, I noticed an intermittent knocking noise coming from the front soon followed by what sounded like transmission whine. It turns out that the Transfer Box / Angle Gear has disintegrated and this is going to cost £1,200 ouch! Having read various blogs on the internet etc, these always seem to fail around the 60-60k mark, so I should have been prepared for it. I have also got through a set of tyres as they were all new when I bought the car cost £450. Is 30k for a set of tyres good? I am a bit disappointed with these failures on what is supposed to be a prestige car, but when you hear some of the horror stories about Landrover Discovery’s I guess you get off lightly being an XC90 owner. So if you are going to own an XC90 out of warranty make sure that you drive a good bargain when you buy the car and put the money you saved in the bank ready for some expensive repairs along the way!
Submitted: 06/03/2009 09:51:25
John Williams, Hampshire
Volvo XC60 D5 SE Lux Geartronic 2008
The Volvo replaces my X3, which was a good car and reliable but had one serious failing ... the ’Sport’ set-up, with thin tyres, big wheels and the ability to jar ones spine running over a match stick. The Volvo is beautifully finished - vastly superior to the X3; the leather seats and ’oak’ floating switch panel make the plastics of the X3 look very cheap. With a softer ride - it is supremely comfortable; handling is positive and although a little slower than the X3, the 184 horses with the five cylinder engine do a sterling job! Well mated to the 6 speed automatic, the car has returned just over 30mpg overall (33 on a long run), which for such a solid 4WD machine, I find acceptable. Where the Volvo astonishes ... apart from its ’blind spot surveillance’ (brilliant!) ... its ’lane deviation warning’ (dips radio volume to chime a warning!) and the ’City Safety’ (as yet NOT checked out as my nerves are not up to it!) ... the intelligent cruise control which takes over control of accelerator and brakes, maintaining safe distance from the vehicle in front applying brakes or accelerating as required ... is a masterpiece of automotive engineering! It takes a while to gain confidence in this sophisticated system, but once one has trust in it ... amazing is an understatement! No faults in nearly 5000 miles; courteous dealers (who can show the BMW people how to treat a customer!) and a quality product, I commend this as a most excellent vehicle!
Submitted: 27/02/2009 09:19:36
David Felton, Wiltshire
Volvo S40 2.0 Sport 2007
Very good, quiet, ultra reliable car. The 2.0 Sport model is a comfortable car to drive, good handling, plenty of power when needed with reasonable fuel economy. On long journeys the cruise control is a boon! The climate control "does what it says on the tin" and during this cold weather the defrost saves all that scraping! Two minutes and the windows from front to back plus mirrors are clear. The only thing that this car needs is a rear wash/wiper. (Volvo please take note.) These cars are not cheap but you only get what you can afford .(My previous car was an Alfa Romeo). All around, one of the best cars I have owned (so far). I look forward to driving it’s successor!
Submitted: 28/01/2009 11:11:56
Nigel Storer, Yorkshire
Volvo V70 D5 Geartronic 2008
Does everything remarkably well. Great long distance cruiser. Good economy. Quick and comfortable. Don’t let the badge put you off! This is a serious piece of metal.
Submitted: 26/01/2009 09:58:23
Fedup, England
Volvo V50 2.0D 2006
Has an intermittent problem with not starting. Doesn’t matter what the weather, time of day, even after a journey. Local Volvo dealer cannot find the problem. I’ve even tried using a different make of diesel.
Submitted: 21/01/2009 09:00:59
James Roberts, Lancashire
Volvo V50 2 litre diesel estate 2008
Has anyone else found the car goes along at 20+ mph without your foot on the gas even uphill, also picks up speed going round corners so much so that I have to brake in the corner which is dangerous. I have had it into my dealer twice but they can’t find the fault on diagnostics and to be honest they do not really want to know. Also, the car steams up badly I can’t keep it clear unless I select the screen button which only works on aircon, then you can’t have the heating on as well, which in this weather is freezing. I am finding the fuel consumption poor - only getting approximately 38mpg on combined usage when statistics claim I should be getting 50+. I am so disappointed with it I am seriously thinking of getting rid, bought it for safety features but it’s the worst car I’ve had.
Submitted: 30/12/2008 15:38:33
Mark Thackeray, Yorkshire
Volvo S60 2004
I have had many cars ranging from £500 -£100k and I have to say - this is the best car I have every owned. I get an easy 50 mpg - if only I knew earlier! I could have saved a small fortune. Not sure about the new 2008 Volvo’s, I am keeping mine for years - done 115k and still sounds like new.
Submitted: 17/10/2008 16:07:36
Ian Hayes, Derbyshire
Volvo XC70 2005
Get your wheel bearings tested. Appears to be a common fault. I have had 3 out of the 4 changed. Warranty team will try and tell you it is wear and tear!!
Submitted: 26/09/2008 11:11:08
Peter Fearnley, Yorkshire
Volvo V50 2.0d r design se sport 2008
One of the best mid range car I’ve ever drove - comes with loads of extras - also came with a good service package. The car looks the biz . Test drove the A4 - the car was not a patch on the Volvo. Just one down side - I would have liked badges on the back to let people behind know what the car is.
Submitted: 22/08/2008 15:59:40
Peter Jones, Gloucestershire
Volvo S80 S80 T6 2001
Impeccable build quality and restrained elegant styling. Deceptively quick and the twin sequential turbos are unobtrusive but give an immediate seamless power boost when most needed. Although only front wheel drive the car is sure footed and forgiving. No appreciable road or mechanical noise. A horrible fiddly sat nav system that is little used but superb comfort thanks to the best front seats in the business. A brilliant sound system and a great feeling of security and insulation from a noisy dangerous world. Space saver spare maybe OK in Europe but not sensible for Australia.The range of steering wheel and front seat adjustment guarantees long distance comfort and enables an all day drive of 600 miles to end with a fresh arrival at a restaurant for dinner. Later model has much needed rear parking sensors.
Submitted: 19/08/2008 09:05:14
Jonathan Maitland-MacIntyre, Berwickshire
Volvo V50 D5 2.4 185bhp SE Sport R-Design 2008
Forget the T5 version and certainly don’t bother with the 2 litre engines or the even smaller ones, this is the one to have for sure! With the R-Design spec and the 18" wheels, as well, it’s transformed as ’a looker’ too. Brilliant mid-range acceleration, this will cruise all day and return mid 40s consumption at a steady (illegal) 85 on the motorway. Off the lights it’ll leave much more fancied German machines for dead and all from a wonderfully warble-y 5 cylinder engine. Sure it mightn’t handle through the bends quite as well as some of the Germans but it’ll leave them for dead on the straights and having had Audi Avants (A6s and A4s) in the past you won’t need to spend a fortune on osteopath bills to sort out your jarred bones either! I reckon these are the bargain of all bargains.......
Submitted: 15/08/2008 09:26:04
Stephen, County Antrim
Volvo XC70 D5 2008
Bought the D5 SE Lux back in March 2008 - and have since clocked up 8000miles in this faultless family wagon. It easily swallows up all the luggage that is needed for a family of four on a weekend away and carries us all in ’BMW’ like comfort with leather, Air Con, and many many more home comforts as standard. The D5 mpg is good for a car of that size and weight - 30mpg urban and 39mpg motorway. Recommended.
Submitted: 13/08/2008 11:12:53
Tony Bennett, Cheshire
Volvo S60 D5 SE 2003
I bought this car when I changed jobs that required me to travel up and down motorways. Having owned a BMW 525 (petrol) previously, this was my first exposure to an ’oil burning’ diesel. I have now driven the car over the past 2 years completing over 40,000 miles and can honestly say I have enjoyed every mile! The Volvo eats miles with ease, and easily delivers 48-51 mpg even at 85mph+. Comfort is second to none, with plenty of power and performance for anyone. The previous owner had every extra possible fitted, (sports pack, winter pack, comms pack etc etc) My dilemma now is trying to find a car as comfortable, with equal performance and with as many ’toys’ as a company car, but unfortunately Audi A8’s BMW’s 7 series and Merc ’E’ classes do not make my available list. The mileage at present is 108,000 and in my experience is only just ’broke-in’ as it still drives fantastic! As previous comments have listed, the only down side is the turning circle. (I have 18" alloys") How can this exceptional car only now be worth £4 - 5K? I nearly forgot to mention, the Dolby surround sound hi-fi - my daughter thinks its even better than her iPod and I must agree, the noise is stunning. Having written these comments, I think I’ll keep her... sod the Volkswagen company car option! Tony.
Submitted: 13/08/2008 11:01:36
T Wichers, Berkshire
Volvo C70 D5 2007
Yes, it looks great (like the wide shoulders of the car), and it puts a smile on your face looking at it and sitting in it. That is until you start the engine, which makes you check the diesel van next to you, and then you realise there is no diesel van next to you. The archaic sound comes from the stylish, sleek car you’re in! And corners are nerve breaking too. Somehow Volvo has managed to turn a very good chassis (same as Ford Focus) into a nervous, understeering and vague car that leaves you feeling disappointed. The springs and dampers don’t match, the steering feels dead and vague. It also shows the lack of rigidity of the body: probably that’s why the springs are softer than is good for the weight of the car. The autobox is probably the worst I have ever experienced (feels the same as my old 850 T5R): slow in response and not fluid enough. The turbolag of the D5 means that driving is much less relaxed than it should be: pulling away or accelerating means anticipating and often results in traction issues due to the delay in throttle response. The two rear seats are comfortable and usable for 2 adults, but with the roof down only below 30 mph. All in all: nice looking car, premium feel, but don’t expect it to drive well if you like agile, responsive and nimble cars.
Submitted: 04/08/2008 08:37:12
John Bell, England
Volvo S40 T5 Sedan 2008
The 2008 Volvo S40 T5 is currently for me, a British Columbia, Canada owner, Volvo’s best offering. It is the most nimble, easy-to-park,economical, and space-efficient model of the four Volvo’s I have owned since 1982. On a long trip(such as a recent 2300km inter-provincial one which I took in June) the car’s comfortable seats, quiet air-conditioning, unflappable suspension, and fine gasoline mileage(37mpg) made it an outstanding vehicle for long-distance travel. Its sun roof made it a great platform from which to view the snowy peaks of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Around town it carries out errands( at least so far) with out faltering. No vehicle is perfect. I would like to see a more accessible glove box, an improved jack handle, and a better coin holder. Reflective safety triangles on the doors and reflective tape on the front and rear bumpers should be in place as on earlier Volvo’s. Volvo Canada has a winner in this little car and should do more to promote it in this country.
Submitted: 30/07/2008 08:25:28
Adam Smith, Cheshire
Volvo S60 D5 SE 2003
Lets get the bad point out of the way... the turning circle is large especially with 17 ins wheels. It can be a pain in tight car parks. You reverse into parking slots never drive in. Small town driving in France and Italy can present a challenge. This is a great car; not just good. It sits in the drive with a Brand new Merc C Class and do you know it’s the better car in many ways. It is a true long hauler giving 48mpg when new and now after 74K 53mpg. Drive the motorways at 60 mph and it returns 63mpg - that’s about 1000 miles on a tankful of diesel. (Manual Gearbox of course) The D5 engine is truely powerful with heaps of torque over a flat range. At 80mph there is still bags of acceleration left so the published 0-60 times really don’t do the thing justice. Suspension is softish , the seating like old armchairs and the drivers position as near ideal as I’ve found. Instruments and controls are perfectly positioned although the handbrake takes a little getting used to. I love this car so much that I’m keeping it. It is easily good for another 100k. One thing to watch for is Volvo servicing and parts cost. Volvo now seem to think they’re the prima donna marque even outpricing MB and BMW. Depreciation is high so unlike me , don’t buy new.
Submitted: 14/07/2008 14:50:27
Dan Bailey, England
Volvo S40 2.0D 2005
I’d just like to counter the ’low miles’ review above - three years and 80,000 miles later, this car is still tight as a drum. Averaging 50mpg on my motorway commute, leather just getting really comfortable now it’s worn in nicely! No engine problems except for the EGR valve - a common problem on all [Ford/Peugeot group] 2.0 diesels, usually an early/warranty failure if it’s going to go - mine was. Only fault was the CD autochanger failed just out of warranty - goodwill payment from Volvo; parts are expensive, however [no different from BMW, Audi, Alfa etc]. Don’t worry about the diesel engine - proven to be good for hundreds of thousands of miles if respected [oil changes/servicing etc.] Safety second to none, leather the best in the business, cruise as standard, a decent drive on 17"alloys, floating console a design classic. Prestige branding without looking like you’re in a company car; a nice sight on the motorway, different to the usual 3series/A4 middle-manager repmobiles. Looks less fussy than the Jag X type, more mature than a Focus or Golf.. If you’re after a leftfield choice, an Apple to everyone else’s PC, then it’s this, the Saab 9-3, or the Lexus 220.
Submitted: 08/07/2008 12:30:17
Robert Coe, Sussex
Volvo XC90 2004
D5 SE all-wheel drive. Bought 2nd hand 2006 with 16k on the clock from a main agent. Fitted with the complete options list. All bells and whistles. Bargain. Recall for steering bushes inspection but all ok. Snag list some chrome strip coming away and the small speaker on the inside of the front passenger window window came off. All fixed free. Locking system went on strike for no reason which the agent fixed Now 35,229 miles. Very happy. Very comfortable. Fuel consumption on around and about local roads and town, 35 mpg (diesel). Motorway 45-48 at steady 60 mph. Drop it to average 50 mph and it will return 55 mpg. Have had six largish family plus luggage on board for 100 miles with only minor groans but they were distracted by movies on the seat screens. screens Regular servicing with main service at 12,600 and an oil/filter change at halfway. Good investment. No mechanical problems. Tyres have lasted 25,000 miles but then I do so before the regulations say and keep careful watch on pressures. Two had to be changed with deep cuts at 10,000 miles. Possible malicious. Excellent for long distance. Brake pads long lasting but I use Geartronic for braking mainly. One unhappiness is the rear brake discs rusting and having to be replaced. Watch out for changing down using Geartronic. It is possible to go to 1st at too high a speed and I suspect that will do the transmission no end of harm. Servicing is a bit pricey but you do get the feeling that is has been done well and servicing staff will answer your questions and provide explanations. Only problem. The Government VED bands that do not relate to real life.
Submitted: 04/07/2008 14:54:04
Steve Walker, England
Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux 2008
I can’t understand the previous guys statement about the car being unstable (!) - he must work for BMW/Audi/Merc as Volvo don’t make "unstable" cars. Safety is their middle name. Anyway let me share my thoughts. 1st of all I should point out that my last car was a 2006 BMW M3 Cabriolet and prior to that I flirted with an Audi A4 1.8t Cabriolet (plus I’ve owned MX5’s and other cabriolets). I was very very sceptical about spending my hard earned cash on a top of the range Volvo as I’m not exactly in what i would call Volvo’s demographic (I’m not retired/over 50 or what you would call sensible). Having owned and driven many thousands of miles in the usual German crop of sports cabriolets I’d convinced myself that their typically hard ride, high fuel consumption and ridiculous running/servicing costs of these cars was normal and acceptable. Having owned my D5 SE Lux spec C70 now for 3 months and racking up 4k miles all I can say is that you really can have your cake and eat it - the car will manage 35-40mpg to the gallon (never less than 32 even when driven like you’ve stolen it) it also has THE best seats I’ve ever parked my backside on and has a stereo thats so audiophile perfect you’d think you were listening to the artist live. Couple all this with the fact it’s got a folding hard roof, looks a million dollars and doesn’t come with the cabrio BMW/Audi/Mercedes stigma and you have a winner. Take my word for it having spent far too much money on cars in the past. The C70 is the best looking, most comfortable, most economical, best riding, best equipped 4 seater cabrio available.
Submitted: 20/06/2008 08:35:38
Andrew, Cheshire
Volvo V70 C70 T5 SE 2006
Had the car 6 months now, and its great. Ours has 17" wheels, and doesn’t tramline at all (we had a BMW that did!), so it does not appear to happen to all cars. Most annoying thing would be when the windows wind down, any water on the roof falls on you. Radio is superb.
Submitted: 19/06/2008 08:18:46
Alistair Grant, Perthshire
Volvo XC90 D5 Executive 2004
My wife had wanted an XC90 for some time and we finally got around to buying this one second hand, two years old, in March 2007. We both enjoy driving it, particularly the handling and the driver position, but have been disappointed by the lack of space - we have 3 grown-up kids - particularly with the two seats at the very rear, which would just about accommodate two young children comfortably. In the first row of rear seats we can only get two of ours in comfortably as a third in the middle inevitably ends up with his or her knees up under their chin. Running costs have been very high. So far in one year we have had to replace all 4 tyres, the two rear brake discs and now we have the start of what sounds like a failing wheel bearing in one of the front wheels (the rear wheel bearings had been replaced by the dealer before we bought it as part of a recall) and of course the warranty has just expired! There are a number of reports online both here in the UK and USA of XC90 wheel bearings failing at an alarming rate, which is VERY disappointing in a car of this supposed quality. Nothing associated with servicing or repairs has been anything but expensive, even going to a local independent garage. As much as we enjoy the car we are becoming increasingly concerned about the reliability and it is not what we would have expected from a high-end Volvo. My wife previously owned a V70 turbo which she ran for 8 years up to 85K miles without any real issues.
Submitted: 12/06/2008 15:37:18
Steve Price, Yorkshire
Volvo S60 2.4 DSE 2005
My 2nd S60 - great value, fantastic comfort, excellent kit (leather, 6CD and other goodies), brilliant fuel economy @ 51 mpg
Submitted: 09/06/2008 08:57:15
Alison Coles, Sussex
Volvo XC90 Se D5 2003
We have a love/hate relationship with our XC90. We love the build, reasonable fuel consumption, comfort and space. We have, however, been plagued with problems. The first and most serious was a complete engine and gear box melt down whilst driving in France. We were flabbergasted that a car of this calibre and cost should suffer such fundamental failure at 51,000 miles and less than 4 years old (just outside warranty - arghhh!) We have also recently had suspension bushes replaced and the drive shaft imploded last week at 60,000 miles! Is this normal? Volvo tell me ’well it is quite an old car’ Well our Audi is even older at 11 years and we have never (touch wood) experienced such major failures. Perhaps we are foolish but we do intend to buy a new XC90, we are hoping that we are just very unlucky and bought a ’Friday’ car. We have looked at alternatives and feel that there is nothing else out there that offers the same space and style. We have 3 young children and 2 dogs so appreciate the large boot and 7 seats. We will however ensure we sell before the warranty expires!
Submitted: 03/06/2008 13:31:07
Doug Sammons, Essex
Volvo C70 se lux d5 2007
Car is very unstable on any uneven road surface. My model has 18" wheels as standard and Volvo admit they cannot fix the problem. Therefore they are saying they are producing a model that "tramlines" dangerously. It’s not just my car, it is ALL C70 models with wheels over 16". Unbelievable but true! This is a good car in all other respects but it spends more time in the air than on the road surface. If you like a steering wheel that is jerking all over the show, buy this car.
Submitted: 15/05/2008 12:17:58
Jeremy Winter, Buckinghamshire
Volvo S60 S60 R 2000
I bought the S60 R when it first came out in 2003 and it has given me five years of trouble-free motoring. When people think of reliability it is normally the German brands BMW, Audi and Volkswagen that come first to mind but I think that this doing Volvo a disservice, they fully deserve to be mentioned alongside them. The S60 is as comfortable on the motorway as it is in the towns and villages. If you want good fuel economy then you should choose the diesel option. It is surprisingly enjoyable to drive, performance and handling are very good. Interior and exterior show great attention to detail.
Submitted: 01/05/2008 14:46:06
Ian Thomas, Yorkshire
Volvo S60 S70 1997
Mine is the S70 with 146k on the clock, runs so smooth, safe and goes like the wind this is my 8th Volvo. Wouldn’t have any other!
Submitted: 31/03/2008 10:31:09
Trevor Pacy, Kent
Volvo C30 1.6 S 2007
This is the first Vovo I’ve owned as I’ve always been put off by its ’boring but safe’ image but this is a really nice car and not boring at all to drive. It’s only a 4 seater so may not suit everyone but it suits us perfectly as a work and family car and is cheaper than the Audi A3 but built on the same spec. The wife really likes the interior and I have to say it is very comfortable and uncluttered. Far from finding the safety features boring (now I have a 8 month old) they are very reassuring - we have taken the option of the ’Magic Eye Mirrors’, which at £350 weren’t cheap but I think money well spent as my wife has always been nervous before about motorway driving but as these mirrors light up when someone is in your blind spot she’s a lot more confident. Running costs are extremely economical and all in all I think this is a very good choice if you’re looking for a family car with a bit of a difference.
Submitted: 29/03/2008 13:16:46
Edward Page, Berkshire
Volvo XC70 2003
I purchased a second hand XC70 from a Volvo dealer a few weeks ago. The vehicle was tested on what now appears to be smooth road, and no test was made on any other road surface. I am now somewhat appalled at the road noise, even a very low speeds, i.e. less than 5 miles per hour, the dealer stated that this was normal? I can’t believe that Volvo would produce a vehicle that has this very marked ’fault’, would others respond and give views.
Submitted: 17/03/2008 16:45:10
Francis Dodds, Staffordshire
Volvo V70 2.0 SE 2007
I’ve had my V70 for 6 months now and I’m very pleased indeed with it’s performance. It’s everything you would expect of a Volvo, solid, safe and reliable but I think it’s anything but boring. There are not many cars that I have driven that I would give 5 stars to but this one really does deserve the highest praise.
Submitted: 16/03/2008 14:18:19
Karl Blair, Hertfordshire
Volvo V70 V70 2.4D 2008
I’m delighted with my new V70. The fit and finish puts many more expensive cars to shame. The 2.4D is economical, yet has more than enough, smoothly delivered, power to cruise at 80-90mph. It’s no "hot hatch" in handling terms, but, then again, why should it be....
Submitted: 13/02/2008 14:31:08
Gil Stross, England
Volvo V70 d5 s geartronic 2003
Great economy, great performance, enough toys, quiet enough for 500 mile days, inoffensive Bad points, poor turning circle, poor rear legroom, low height of tailgate when open (I’m only 5’8") slightly soggy handling (I should have paid more for the sports suspension) This is my fourth Volvo estate, I’m looking for another because I can’t find anything that does the job better at a sensible price.
Submitted: 14/01/2008 12:00:17
Keith Wylie, Yorkshire
Volvo XC90 se d5 geartronic 2004
Excellant car would have got 5 stars except for recalls and part failures Wishbone replaced under recall. Wheel bearings collapsed at 20,000 miles (scary) Ignition lock failed on a car that is just over 3years old with just 28,000 miles done was told wear and tear .First time ever this has happened to me with nearly 30 years motoring behind me my 20 year old ford cortinas ignition lock never failed strange. interior trim falls to bits. Steering Rack failed at just over 3 years old and 26,000 miles was told pot holes would cause this god help me if i ever took it off road. this happened on my ford at 19 years old and 180,000 miles. TV/DVDs stopped working replaced under warrenty. fuel economy good for a big car 25 to 30 mpg
Submitted: 02/01/2008 16:29:37
Markus Fors, County Fermanagh
Volvo V50 V50 1.6D SE 5dr
Cheers: Fuel efficient Comfortable Flexible The total economy makes it a good buy. Jeers: Overpriced Comments: The most environmental Volvo so far beside the C30 1,6D. It’s easy to get a brief overview, easy to reach and easy to use the buttons, they are accessable and approachable. There’s been a lot of talk about the cup holders and where to storage junk but hey isn’t it like that if you don’t have anywhere to storage it, it wont be left there. Overall , it’s exactly what I had expected where fuel consumption, station-wagon,environmental awareness and the overall total economy were my top issues. I went from a petrol driven VW Golf III 1,6 -03 to the brand new Volvo V50 1,6 Diesel and SAVED about a ? 50 a month (I drive long distances). This was one of my best car buys I’ve done. If I wasn’t in need of a station wagon (my dog) I’d go for the C30 1,6D Efficiency that comes out this spring and save even more money. But unfortually that car is too small for us. I will for sure test drive it though and see what I will miss.
Submitted: 12/12/2007 09:21:24
David Davidson, England
Volvo V50 1.6D 2006
I like the car very much to be this small engine and low consuming it is nice to drive. BUT several 3times noe the engine have suddenly lost power during driving. the engine dont rev over 2800rpm and max speed is around 60kph The volvo dealer have not been able to trace the error and complain that it is so hard to investigate due to that the error is gone when they recive the vehicle. Problem is temporarly gone when when cykle the ignition - and workshop are never open in the evenings or hollidays when it happens. please could anyone with similar problem send the VIN number so I can Investigate what the solutions have been for your cars d.andersson@hrmritline.se
Submitted: 07/12/2007 09:09:50
Mark Gordon, Essex
Volvo C70 2.4 T 2dr 2005
I’ve had this car 12 months and it’s a blinder! I would never have considered a Volvo before but this is something special. It drives like a dream and has all the comfort you would expect from a far more expensive car. They’ve stopped producing these now, which is a shame but definately worth getting second hand like mine. A very classy car.
Submitted: 26/11/2007 12:44:27
James Smith, Devon
Volvo V70 2.5 T 2007
Everything you expect from a Volvo, practical, safe and spacious but not exciting.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:11:25
Marie Lawrie, Middlesex
Volvo S60 2.4 D5 2007
Proof that Volvo can produce an attractive car. Excellent, reliable engines and solidly built.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:02:36
Les Browning, Gloucestershire
Volvo V70 2.4D5 SE Sport 5dr 2007
I am very pleased that I chose this Estate. It has very comfortable and supportive seats, which my wife finds very comfortable as she has a bad back. It is a lovely car to drive and once you get used to there being no handbrake (you find yourself grabbing for it and finding thin air, which can be disconcerting at first) you soon get used to the fact it’s electronic. Very spacious and of course it’s a very safe car to be in. Very well designed all round.
Submitted: 21/11/2007 21:31:49
Mark Veitch, Warwickshire
Volvo XC90 2007
No review submitted.
Submitted: 14/11/2007 09:31:14
Paul Rose, Leicestershire
Volvo V50 1.6D SE 5dr
Reliable, safe and pratical, as you’d expect from a Volvo. The V50 is a lot better looking than most Volvos and has some nice sporty details inside. Great to drive and handles perfectly. I’m extremely pleased with this car. I’m only giving it 4 out f 5 because there is a little more engine noise than I would like but I wouldn’t say it’s intrusive. Very good car.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 21:04:14
Phil Waters, Derbyshire
Volvo C30
A less common alternative to the Audi A3. Nice to drive.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 10:43:43
Sharon Brown, Lancashire
Volvo S80
My Volvo has excellent handling, nice dashboard layout & comes with a good spec, but is quite bumpy & not really that well refined. Quite cheap to buy as a 2-3 year old car.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 10:38:12
Mike Moran, Norfolk
Volvo XC90 3.2 SE
The 7 seats makes this off-roader perfect form my extended family. Both the interior and the exterior are built to last and are built using quality materials. This a quality 4x4 and Volvo have got everything spot on. The steering column can be adjusted for comfort and the car offers a pleasant ride with the minimum of noise. The only reason I have not awarded the XC90 5 stars is due to the fuel economy which is not the best at arounf 20mpg.
Submitted: 22/10/2007 12:21:03
Adrian Caulder, Mid-Lothian (Edinburghshire)
Volvo XC70 2.4 DS SE Lux 5dr
I do some hefty motorway mileage both for work and personally so I wanted something I could do it in in real comfort and having 3 kids safety was paramount. This is a fabulous car and the safety spec is second to none. Very comfortable drive and massive amount of space. Excellent.
Submitted: 12/10/2007 15:31:44
Paul Masters, Berkshire
Volvo S40 1.6D SE
Good looker however not completely free from its faults The 1.6d would have not been my first choice however this was company car, and so the tax was considerably low for a car in its class. The 1.6d is quite refined an I am impressed by the engine management as Volvo seem to know how to get the best performance from a small diesel engine.. The main problem is that I don’t think Volvo planned the S40 1.6d to be a high miler. My car is a 56 plate, Nov 06, and it now as 27000 on the clock. There seems to be a issue with the intercooler as mine was replaced at 20000 miles. Maybe the turbo’s working overtime to get the best out of the 1.6d?. The annoying thing with this car is that, should the cars on board computer detect the slightest fault, this will take over and limit the cars performance. Should this occur the car would only do a maximum of 60mph on a flat road, reducing to about 30-40mph even on a slight incline and is not ideal when away on business! This happened 3 times until Volvo finally replaced the intercooler. The air con has also stopped working which, has been addressed by Volvo however, 3 visit to the garage later the air cons still not working! My colleges have also had issues with the 2ltr petrol, as they seem to cut out and having said this, one of my college had the contract ended early as he claimed the cars was not fit for purpose due to on going problems with the loss of power. Overall, I wouldn’t really suggest the s40 as a fleet car however, problems do happen and having driven the S40 2.4i SE, this is the model I would recommend however, only for low mileage users!
Submitted: 20/09/2007 09:07:52
Lianne Lawrence Harbord, Pembrokeshire
Volvo XC90 D5 SE
Excellent quality, wonderful to drive. This car is fantastic on long journeys with the children and full of luggage.
Submitted: 19/09/2007 11:12:53
Gavin Winters, Durham
Volvo XC90 Vovlo XC90 D5 SE
If you are looking for a family car with high comfort and that is exceptional to drive, look no further. This car is so well thought out I really can’t think of a single thing to mark it down. 10 out of 10, well done Volvo.
Submitted: 08/08/2007 15:42:50
Volvo C70 lease prices
Volvo V50 lease prices
Volvo S40 lease prices
Volvo S80 lease prices
Volvo V70 lease prices
Volvo XC60 lease prices
Volvo XC70 lease prices
Volvo XC90 lease prices
Volvo C30 lease prices
Volvo S60 lease prices
Search Reports by Make
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |
CarAndVanAuctions.co.uk | CarSupermarkets.co.uk | TheVanWebsite.co.uk | SaveMoneyOnCars.co.uk | ContractHireAndLeasing.com | FleetDirectory.co.uk
WinACarCompetition.co.uk | TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk | CarLeasingCompanies.co.uk | RoadTestReports.co.uk
CarLeasingSpecialOffers.co.uk | VanLeasingSpecialOffers.co.uk
