Volvo road tests and customer reviews. Submit your own Volvo review, read other driver's opinions or visit the best road test web sites available on the web.
Have your say!
Volvo lease prices ![]()
Volvo new cars and nearly new cars ![]()
2009 R-Design - The XC60 R-Design comes in standard and SE trims, both of which provide a plethora of standard equipment to feel every inch the luxury SUV. With strong residual values, competitive pricing and Volvo’s... read more
- The Volvo C70 may not have the kudos of an Audi A5 Cabrio or BMW 3-Series Convertible, but the Swede is cheaper to buy, insure, service and run. Most buyers of the C70 opt for the 2.0-litre turbodiese... read more
- The Volvo C30 is one of those cars that many buyers have made up their mind they are going to own long before they ever set foot near a Volvo dealership. Its distinctive good looks are even more appea... read more
D5 R-Design - The V50 is, unsurprisingly for a Volvo, an estate, but it’s not the huge slab of car you’d usually associate with the Swedish carmaker. It’s a smallish, but perfectly formed family car that trades som... read more
DRIVe - The big attraction with the S80 in DRIVe form is its superb economy and emissions. You may have to trade some performance when picking the 1.6-litre turbodiesel engine, but the reward for company driv... read more
DRIVe - Volvo has wrought a number of changes on the XC60 DRIVe to make it cleaner and greener than its standard diesel-engined compact SUV. Most obvious of these is to ditch four-wheel drive in favour of fro... read more
DRIVe - Buyers wanting to go green with a Volvo V50 have two choices of the Swedish firm’s DRIVe model: one with the eco-friendly 1.6-litre turbodiesel engine and the other with the same engine but equipped w... read more
DRIVe 1.6D - Volvo’s existing, highly efficient 1.6 litre turbo diesel engine has been retained to power the DRIVe model range. With an impressive 64.2mpg from a sports coupe, Volvo have certainly grabbed the mark... read more
1.6D DRIVe - The Volvo S40 is an elegant saloon the features excellent build quality and safety. The performance is spirited and the handling is precise. Volvo’s strong residuals and the impressive fuel economy of... read more
2.4-litre diesel - This vehicle stops you from hitting cars, which are directly in front – pure sci-fi? Actually it’s not. The boffins have developed a Crossover, that uses the latest technology to keep you as safe as... read more
1.6D R-Design Sport - Swedish maker has upped the ante with its latest hot hatch - the Volvo C30 R-Design. It certainly is a good-looking car the bodykit includes a roof spoiler, alloy wheels and unique R badging. Our test... read more
2.4 Geartronic SE - The drive with this engine really was effortless and combined with the automatic gearbox was a very relaxing experience.... read more
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 18 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 13 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 12 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 11 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 9 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 5 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 5 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 3 reviews )
The latest Volvo driver reviews and road test reports. The views expressed in these consumer reviews do not reflect the thoughts and opinions of ReallyGoodDomains.com
Submit a Volvo road test report
![]()
Nothing but trouble with this from the day I bought it, has broken down now 3 times. 1st time after only 5 days. Customer service was weak, garage since closed!!! Started stalling when stopped at lights, is now a gamble if it starts at all in the mornings.... Fuel economy sitting on 9.8l/100km about 23 mpg, and thats using petrol not bio. Car feels clunky in the gear change,; did i mention £220 for a replacement Pirelli tyre? This car is now a burden and the current climate means I cant sell it. Boo hoo Volvo
Responses to this review
This is my third time writing and in response to your article I would like to say that I paid no more than £145 for 18" Pirelli rosso tires from Volvo main dealers. my main dealer put customer service first always - Peter Fearnley from Yorkshire
Submitted: 07/02/2010 11:27:51
![]()
Bought my S60 D5 at 2 years old with 25k on the clock and have now completed over 85k in it. It is by far and away the best car I have ever owned having had BMWs, Mercs etc. Average of 45mpg (even with a heavy right foot) and cheap insurance. The torque on the motorway is fantastic and I would highly recommend this car to anyone who actually enjoys driving. S60s eat miles up with ease. Only down side is the cost at Volvo dealers for servicing but any reputable garage can service the car with ease and for a fraction of the price. Def keeping mine for now as it still looks and drives like new. Never a minutes worry in 4 years and the safest car I have had the pleasure to own.
Submitted: 05/02/2010 19:59:21
![]()
My wife and I had been looking at an XC90 around 3 years ago when she was 1st pregnant and at the time we just couldn’t get one for our budget of £25k. We decided to go for a BMW X3 2.0d se demo that was on offer and had plenty of toys (leather, privacy glass, h/seats etc). This car was faultless for the 2 1/2 years we had it having only 1 service with BMW (£190) in 28k miles and averaging 42mpg on short journeys. However it was coming up due a large service and 4 new tyres so I started looking again and visited Volvo to look at the XC60 and ended up buying a new XC90....got a 2010. MY This car is nicer to drive (although not as sporty its far more comfortable) and has great road prescence. As my wife is expecting our 2nd child it is going to be prefect as the boot is huge and the car has loads of nice wee family friendly touches. Its only done 2K miles since we got it and the only faults I would mention are : 1. I’m getting poor mileage - average 27mpg which I hope will improve in time as the engine gets run in. 2. A car this size should def have front parking sensors as standard. We ordered the car in fairly standard spec; Metallic paint, automatic and winter pack - that was really it, the standard spec is the same as an SE less full leather and alloy wheels are a wee bit smaller, add to the SE spec you get privacy glass and adaptive xenons; we are delighted so far. All of this plus 3 years servicing included for £24k; there was a 3 year old XC90 SE on the forecourt with 42k miles and it was the old D5 ( 163 ) and it was for sale for 21k, only 1 year warranty and no servicing ????? I think I can do without leather seats thanks. Ill keep you posted
Submitted: 01/02/2010 10:06:55
![]()
This car was chosen to replace an uncomfortable A6 estate, and in most respects it has done a sterling job: It’s VERY comfortable, it’s good in bad weather, it is the best towing car I’ve had, and it handles fairly well for a car of this bulk. In my opinion, it’s damn good looking, too. It is not economic, and struggles to beat 30mpg - if economy is the main requirement then steer clear. Considering previous experience with Volvo, it hasn’t been bullet proof, either - electrical gremlins shut the car down in France due to a problem with the AC system (the subject of a subsequent recall) and failed drivers electric window (not useful at an airport car park) and failed rear door closed indicator (which prevented the car from being locked) have been an irritation. Overall, I’ve had the car about a year and on balance it’s good; cruising and comfort spring to mind in terms of the car’s strong points, but fuel consumption is too high for my liking.
Responses to this review
Hi, its said that the volvo xc60 will do 47 mpg 2wd is that right? - Gary Williams from Swansea
Submitted: 26/01/2010 14:42:05
![]()
Great when it works - have spent £1300 on new Engine management and 6 months later it has now decided to start intermittently. Volvo dealership is pretty useless, think they just swap parts and read codes until you run out of money! Servicing is too expensive and electronics are very nice but appear a bit flakey. Looks pretty though - something to look at when you can’t drive the so**ing thing!
Submitted: 25/01/2010 21:04:41
![]()
I bought it second hand, a super deal 2 years ago. The power and aceleration are super! Suspension is not sporty but comfortable. Mechanical and electrical problems: just one, a bulb. It is a big car and I like the ride; it is easy to park everywhere. The adventages are 1 - great acceleration and acceptable km/ lt average 2- Super comfortble ergonomic seats 3- safety, fantastic double glass windows 4- style, design and a great stereo performance.
Submitted: 20/01/2010 16:23:16
![]()
Without sounding soppy, I simply love this car. I bought it second hand and it had been previously owned/driven by someone who had been less than caring when it comes to maintenance, but even so my impressions are of of very solid, well balanced, very safe and highly responsive car. On the long road, the 2.4l engine eats up the miles, at very acceptable levels of consumption, and the cruise control makes driving an effortless exercise. The styling is timeless and the new Volvo remains one of the most beautiful cars on the road. I don’t care about depreciation, I will never sell my car! Volvo for life!
Submitted: 12/01/2010 22:49:26
![]()
Bought new in March 2006 and now at 77,000 miles in Dec ’09. Twice yearly trips from Scotland to Austria otherwise rural roads and town driving. Luxury pan-euro cruiser at 100mph+ on autobahn commands respect from other road users. Never used snow chains in Alps or Scottish winters as AWD simply pulls car anywhere (fitted with Pirelli Scorpion Ice & Snow winter tyres). 29mpg town / 35mpg rural / 39mpg at steady 70mph UK motorway. £210 / band F road tax. Faults have been rear wheel bearing (known fault replaced with enhanced units by dealer under warranty) & drop links. Otherwise reliable. Servicing costs pricey but dealer is best ever experienced - washes, valets car and dresses tyres for even the smallest of vists - swaps summer / winter tyres at no cost. Load lugger, takes 7 passengers (rear seats comfy up to about 45min journey for adults), super safe, fantastic drive. Power just about matched to car but avoid pre-2006 D5 smaller units (162bhp). Great car but make sure you have the budget to continue servicing & ownership!
Responses to this review
I agree with David Blattman... Volvo`s rock - johncharlesohara@msn.com for more info - Chas O’Hara from Dumbartonshire
Submitted: 31/12/2009 11:11:56
![]()
This is my 3rd volvo, the first was a 760 GLE, which I thought was the best car i ever bought, the second a v70 2litre that was nice but underpowered, the T5 ticks all the boxes, fast comfortable and enjoyable, it runs my old 760 very close, so much so that I am keeping it for another few years, and that is going to cost me £2000 at the dealers to get it all up together, (it’s been stood for 6 months due to illness) simply superb car.
Submitted: 23/12/2009 22:03:52
![]()
The very best car I’ve owned. Very good looking, comfortable for the whole family, including two teenage boys and the dog. No problems at all. Bought for the safety features and reliability; has not let us down. A very solid car, we live in the country and it has been a positive boon, through the snow and ice, mud, and fallen trees, this car is fantastic.
Submitted: 23/12/2009 21:57:54
![]()
I have had my volvo estate V70 Diesel 2000 CC for 8 months now and find it fantastic for my disabled 4 wheel scooter in the back. I pull a caravan and don’t notice it on the back travelling at 65 to 70 mph with 37 to 42 mpg. With the leather black and white seats the comfort is great at the age of 65 year old with aches and pains we travelled to Devon with out a stop and after 4 plus hours never felt any aches or pains. We did the same journey in a Vauxhall Astra Sports 2006 model and I spent the next day in bed with a bad back. The only thing I should have had is auto then I could have a sleep when traveling ha, ha, (joking). It is the best car I have purchased, if I could give it a 10 star rating I would have but I could only give 5 stars and after too many cars to list this is the best. I had a bit of a problem with no hand brake but ok now.
Submitted: 17/12/2009 14:44:08
![]()
A nice looking car. I’ve had it for 5 months and have done 5 thousand miles. The computer says the average fuel consumption on a long run is 42 miles to the gallon, with around town at 33 mpg. More than happy. I have had only 1 problem to date which is a noisy rear wheel bearing. It feels well screwed together with no irratating rattles. It has plenty of power when needed. The seats need a bit of time to set up to get comfortable. Very good road holding with the suspension set just right. I would put it on par with a Honda Accord. All in all a good alrounder with good safety equipment.
Submitted: 11/12/2009 22:12:54
![]()
I’ve had the car from new for six months, in that time it has been back to the garage four times, the last time for six weeks. The car keeps shutting down and will either rev continually or will not go above 30mph. The car is dangerous and unreliable, you can not trust it. I would not recommend a Volvo to anybody. When the weather is cold it is pot luck if the car is going to start or not. I am very, very, disappointed with the car and when it happens again, which it will, I will seriously consider telling Volvo they can have the car back as it is not safe.
Submitted: 10/12/2009 11:10:23
![]()
If versatility is your goal in a modern motorcar where you need a bit of pep to blow away the blues - qualified with a dash of sense that tells you you're doing both the planet and your wallet good when you're driving - you couldn't do better than to entrust yourself to the new V50 DRIVe. small estate which is based on the Ford Focus - but is so much better buil and starting at £18660 it's not bad value. It's the perfect town and country adaptable package combining svelte Swedish lines with commodious estate-like capacity. You'll feel like a saint driving it, knowing that it's mpg and low carbon footprint are considerable enough, almost to convince you that you're doing the planet a favour in owning such a machine. Solid as a Swedish Sunday underneath, its appearance is the epitome of good modern taste. You won't find Flash Harrys and Harriets fighting over each other to own one of these. Instead, owners are likely to be well-grounded and sensible folk who don't mind looking good, but eschew vulgarity. Contact with the road is provided by energy saving tyres that have a firm grip on today's ecological agenda. If owning one of these cars won't exactly give you the time of your life, it will fit in nicely with the life you are expected to lead in these times. It ticks all the boxes, while managing, at the same time, to box clever - so expect no flash but plenty of dash: verve with the Volvo twist, in other words. The interior is cleverly appointed to combine maximum security for occupants - a prime Volvo aim, of course, - with ergonomically pleasing and functionally comfortable automobile upholstery. It's an airy cabin that is confidence inspiring and constantly reassuring and you can choose from a number of different trim spec. levels. Everything has substance, and, of course, there's a five star safety rating. Belt and braces security is born of stability control systems to save the terminally incompetent from themselves and should you finally crash, there are more barrage balloons on board than were used to protect London in the Blitz. One marvel of this car is the combination of aerodynamic and aesthetic efficiency with load carrying capacity that's adequate - if not huge (enough for all but the antique dealer and his grandfather clock, I suggest.). The eco systems function by switching the smooth and torquey 1.6 litre, 108bhp diesel engine off every time you stop - and being a Volvo you can guarantee it's going to start up again without any hassle every time. `But surely performance is compromised and sacrificed on the altar of mean spirited money saving, celery eating, greenness. A chap can't have his cake and eat it.` I hear you say. Well in this instance I'm pleased to report that it's not, and you can. Driving it is a joy, and if you need to make rapid progress, the car is lively enough - cruising quietly and smoothly at high motorway speeds and zipping about on A and B roads if you need to. Low rolling resistance tyres, low friction transmission oil in the gearbox, lowered ride height, slippery aerodynamics, magic jiggery pokery mapping of the engine management and the 'stop/start system (Which can be switched off) all contribute to the frugality. The only doubt that lurks in the corner of my mind is 'how long will the starter motor and ring gear last?' - but then since it's a Volvo they're probably made of some yet undiscovered metal that is harder than diamonds and will last forever. At this juncture I must tell you about a fifty-five mile Sunday bimble along twisty A roads and quiet country lanes. (The sort of trip that Trusty Trevor and Theresa would make to visit a National Trust property.). Never exceeding 60mph., but certainly not holding up traffic, the economy proved to be inter stellar. A mind disorientating 82.3 mpg showed on the trip computer! (My bicycle doesn't do that). Immediately I telephoned my MP and instructed him to rush through a Bill consigning all hybrids to the dustbin. Volvo deserves a New Years Honour for producing such a good, solid, sensible - and enjoyable car. Volvo marketing and design people, over the years, have cleverly carved out a niche in the market. Not only that - among motor manufacturers they are indeed ahead of the game, because more than most companies, Volvo have proved themselves the rule makers and mould breakers. There's nothing quite like a Volvo. Now - let me STOP praising the car and START enjoying driving it. Eco driving has never felt so indulgent.
Responses to this review
I used to run a much older Volvo estate. T’was a spacious and lovable wagon, which could have transported the contents of a small house within the commodious boot. Occasionally pressed into service as a rally "barge" it carried out its week end duties without a murmur through a wide variety of on and off road conditions and with approaching 180,000 on the clock,it finally went on in far more rugged hands than mine to be remembered for several years with affection by followers of MAT 1F. I would need to explore the potential of this latest version of a Scandinavian thoroughbred with a swift autobahn sortie to the Black Sea and back in seasonable spring time weather of course - Robert D Hall from Staffordshire
Submitted: 25/11/2009 13:25:01
![]()
Nice looking car but too small. Handbrake gets in the way when changing gear and head rests impair view from rear window. Elec mirrors and windows sometimes fail to work but biggest problem is the fuel consumption. I’ve had the car for two months and am getting no more than 240miles form a full tank.
Responses to this review
I think you may have a problem with your car! I have a V50 2.0D and drive from Devon (Okehampton) to London (Surbiton) every week. I can do the round trip on a full tank (£45’ish). Thats on the A303 with cruise control at 80mph, (2200rpm). It may bw worth having it checked out - Henry Authers from Devon
Submitted: 10/11/2009 09:48:45
![]()
I chose this as a company car as I wanted more space and the styling of this estate is better than most in its price bracket. For a base model it is also well equipped, came with climate control, e/w windows all round etc. Chose the 1.6D as I thought it would be economical - I think Volov claim 56 mpg combined. I struggle to get above 45/46 mpg. I think the best I ever managed was 50 mpg when I first got it and ran it is an 60mph. I have pumped up the tyres to the ECO pressure of 36 psi and stick to 70-75 mph on the motorway which is 80 per cent of its mileage, but still the economy is rubbish and had I known, I would not have got it. Previously had a 1.9D Megane and on the same journey driving at higher speeds happily got 50 mpg. Only other problem was that the turbo needed replacing after about six months and I also find that the engine seems to hesitate quite frequently when on part throttle. If you are thinking about buying this for its claimed economy I would avoid it.
Submitted: 30/10/2009 22:54:26
![]()
Second V50. Previously owned 2005 2.0D SE. When I set out to look for the replacement I tested Audi and BMW, but when it came down to it the Volvo beat them on price, value for money, specification, and safety features. Bigger mirrors of the revised car, a big improvement and heated/memory seats a great luxury. Overall, the drive is unexplainably better. The clutch is a bit heavy and the gear box a bit agricultural compared to some rivals, but this is a vice I am prepared to live with. No reliability issues from either car, though inexplicably the newer one averages 42mpg after 20 months, whereas the last car got about 47mpg. I drive the 136bhp C class diesel today and it was snail like in comparison. Support previous comments about problems with heater, read the instruction book, the air con system slightly complex, but good if you use it probably. Mill Volvo Sunderland - service excellent.
Submitted: 28/10/2009 20:39:26
![]()
The car is gutless unless you put your foot to the floor; it is too low geared as well. 70 mph is 3200 rpm.
Submitted: 26/10/2009 09:25:13
![]()
This car is one of the most under rated cars on the road. I have returned 43 MPG over the time I have owned this car and it is all round about the town or fairly short journeys (up to 65 miles). The car is comfortable, easy to drive, responsive and can top 100 MPH in a blink of an eye and still has more MPH to offer. This car is coming up to 93000 on the clock and has never once let me down. The service programme on this Model is 18000 or 1 year, which ever comes quickest. My car is serviced by our local Volvo garage and the cost of services plus any parts which may be required from time to time are both in line with the rest of other cars in this range of vehicle. I have owned various makes of cars over the years and none of them are any where near the satisfaction I have had with this car. Next car to be owned - a Volvo S60 or 80 no need to even think about any other car.
Submitted: 21/10/2009 09:38:30
![]()
Good car for Company Director covering all of England and Wales with long commute, country living and two large dogs with luxury of Morgan 4 litre in garage plus third coupe car. I owned two previous Volvo’s in between a BMW X5, Mercedes C class estate, 2 Range Rovers and a Discovery and the XC70 (2004 - 2008). It proved the most practical of the lot. However it was off the pace with chassis development to the point of floating around bends making passengers sick. On motorways and A class roads taking me from my farmhouse near Ludlow to our country holiday home 850 miles away in Southern France; slushing down muddy lanes with me alone driving fine. But I opted for a Q7 when I retired a few months ago since it has the space for the dogs and more modern technology giving a far superior ride and engine. Pity. I liked Volvo’s.
Submitted: 21/10/2009 09:32:19
![]()
This is my second review, I bought the car new in Jan 2008 and fell in love with it immediately. The car is definitely a head turner, the ride is firm, the drive responsive and can be fast when you need it. I test drove both Audi and Saab and I must say the Saab came close to the Volvo but lost out on looks. I’ve had no problems with the car and the servicing package was a bonus, as Volvo servicing can be expensive. The down side, if there is one, is that the boot space is a bit on the small side. I’ve done just over 15,000 miles and I reckon it won’t be long before I need 2 front tyers at a cost of £160 each (ouch).
Submitted: 13/10/2009 08:50:23
![]()
The only problem I’ve encounted with my XC60 SE LUX D5 is with the battery. The car is only 1 week old, with delivery miles only on it, and now the battery has drained 1 of the cells and the car will not start!! The car will only start from a jump start, after calling volvo assistance out I was told that the CD player was draining the battery which is a 1st for me!! But apart from that it’s a beautiful car inside and out.
Submitted: 24/08/2009 13:33:44
![]()
A great car - very comfortable and well equipped, but let down by poor dealer service and low mpg. I would suggest avoiding the D5 and the auto gearbox.
Submitted: 10/08/2009 08:38:27
![]()
This car has a surprising amount of power and torque and has a very willing turbo with little lag. It drives smoothly in all gears and the engine management provides an even response while ticking over at low speeds in traffic. This makes it very tempting to play around in the gears with a gearshift that is positive and almost sporty, easily manipulated by your thumb and index finger. There’s definately no ’spoon in a bowl of porridge’ feel with this gear gate. Fuel consumption is a little dissapointing if you are expecting 60 mpg on all trips. This is only achievable on a very calm day at lower speeds. I have recorded 64 mpg at 64mph average from Watford to Exeter but have only managed that once. That does not mean though that you do not average between 50 and 55 mpg on a regular basis on the open road. City driving gives me an average 44 mpg return. Road Noise and wind noise is impressively low. Engine noise at low speeds is probably in line with most average small diesels, but at 70 mph it purrs along no different to my previous petrol driven car. As far as looks are concerned it still gives me a thrill even now when I walk towards it. That prowling nose lying low on the ground as you walk towards it is simply ’very impressive’. The side lines and the back of the car simply continue the symphony of design which few cars in it’s class have. It’s well worth letting it grow on you by dragging a deck chair a little closer, sitting down, and just looking at the lines....for a long time. The only complaint thus far is an irritating shock absorber rattle at low speed on a rough road. My milaege is 65,000 miles and I would have thought that suspension components on a modern car should do a bit better than that. So in summary I can only say that this has been one of my best buys, if not the best. So the next time you want to buy a car, spend some time admiring the S40 1.6d SE.
Submitted: 05/08/2009 09:14:57
![]()
I also have a love hate relationship with my xc90. We also have the same problem with towing. Our engine service required is displayed in the dashboard when pulling our caravan, the car then goes into limp mode, however if the car is driven for another minute it will then disappear. No other lights or messages are displayed but I am starting to get worried and always think how much is this going to cost me. Mr Sherwood, did you get your car reprogrammed by the garage with him saying it was a software issue? And is it OK now? Our car did it again this weekend but with a full boot and 5 passengers - no caravan. Just seems to do it under heavy load. Can anybody give me advise? Thanks
Submitted: 21/07/2009 09:34:21
![]()
I absolutely love this car. I drive long distances and its smooth and comfortable and I get an average of about 34mpg; which isn’t too bad for a petrol. It’s also pretty quick, and you can surprise a few cars at the lights and roundabouts if you want. The overtaking is very good. It’s also proved to be very reliable, only trouble I had was a wheel bearing needed replacing after hitting a very big pot hole but that’s hardly Volvo’s fault. I was a bit sceptical of Volvo before I brought this car due to the image, but would definitely buy another one now, its such a quality car. Would like a go in a d5 as well now!!
Submitted: 20/07/2009 15:47:52
![]()
Love the car, very stable and safe. The new gearbox/powershift works really well with the 2litre diesel. It really feels more premium compared to VW equivalent. The only downside I found was that the plastic on the door to put your elbow is hard plastic.
Submitted: 17/07/2009 14:17:47
![]()
At present I am in a love-hate relationship with my April 2006 XC90. I bought it at 3100 miles as an ex-demonstrator. Mileage now 25785. It is mainly used for towing a 17 foot caravan and it is the best towcar I have had in 40 years of caravanning. Towing mileage so far 6034. The car had its annual service as usual in April 2009. At 24856 miles (957 miles after service including 205 miles towing) while towing it suddenly displayed "Anti-skid service required" followed by "Engine service required urgent" and then went into limp mode. The engine management symbol was on. The car was recovered by truck to the supplying dealer who diagnosed "injector for No 4 cylinder not seated fully into unit and after clearing codes and road testing found the engine management light and then discovered a signal wire detached from block connector/housing - not fully in block connector. Resecured & tighten (sic) wire cleared codes and road tested. Vehicle OK". Last week the same sequence occurred with caravan on tow and we had to be trucked home 130 miles. Mileage from first breakdown 929 including 230 miles of towing. By the time we got home and it came off the truck the management light had gone out and an hour or so after that the message about engine service had also gone out. After some persuasion the dealer collected the car by truck, having no difficulty driving the car up the ramps. Their finding is now awaited. The car has otherwise performed well and took us on 1493 miles of towing in Iberia in 2007 and 1617 in France last year without problems. In 2008 while solo away from home we had similar displays but no limping and another dealer to which I immediately took it said there was a recall outstanding which the supplying and servicing dealer had not told me about. Something to do with software I was told. I bought the car for retirement and long term ownership but am now wondering whether I have to review my decision.
Submitted: 15/07/2009 09:27:41
![]()
I am not really in Volvo’s target market being only 30 years old and preferring cars with a lot of get up and go. However I have been amazed by the V70 and can say its the best car I’ve owned to date. My reason for getting one was two rather large dogs (mine). It is a very confortable cruiser be it at 75mph where you get 40mpg, to a lot higher speeds should you want to use them. Like someone said before if you drive "enthusiastically" you will really have to try to get less than 32mpg. The seats are superb highly supportive and very comfortable. The fit and standard of kit is also excellent. The stereo is the best standard fit I’ve ever seen. Performance wise I would def go for the D5 or the T6 if you want any sort of decent performance feel. If your not bothered about this then by all means the other cars are worth it, but I feel somewhat underpowered. The D5 is mostly about straight line speed, through the corners its not bad, not lots of body roll but you don’t get the tweaked feel of the German marques. Load space is huge with the seats down, although quite shallow. There are some good built in tweaks like a built in dog guard, and something to stop your shopping moving all over the boot. Ok this car isn’t up there with the 530D in terms of prestige and performance and driving pleasure. That said I got such a ridiculous credit crunch lease deal that I would much rather have 85% of what the BMW is and save £250 p/m This car always makes me smile especially on motorway sliproads, where its performance is often underestimated by some unfortunate rep mobile. It is a bit of a sleeper....enjoy...
Submitted: 10/07/2009 09:30:40
![]()
This might sound like a grumble but it’s not - it’s just my experience of an S80. I purchased this car from a Volvo dealer in Leeds. It was an ex Volvo company car, low mileage, one year old and test drove well. It is very high spec and well laid out. However, I’ve had lots of problems with it which has resulted in a complaint being made to Volvo UK customer services in Marlow. I’ve had: Chassis creaking when driving around corners (still there and ongoing for Volvo to determine the problem!) Ingress of water through the windscreen due to the top seal failing (twice). Nice when you drive around a corner to get a soaking when water pours through the centre console lights. Manufacturers fault with the in-car mobile phone unit which drains the battery within 96 hours (Volvo replaced under warranty) Poor fuel consumption - guess we have to live with it as Volvo reckon it’s OK. Wireless key fob loses contact with the car when inside it so you can’t do anything with the car (lock it, start it). (The way to fix this is to walk far away from the car for a few minutes), complete failure of the dashboard - just went into meltdown. (Volvo warranty repair). Satnav - failure of the media unit making it unusable (Volvo warranty repair). Failure of the horn/siren unit (warranty repair). Recall - heater problem that can cause fires (yikes) (recall repair). It’s a shame because otherwise it’s a real nice car. Would I buy another one ? Not unless I have a really good Volvo dealer on hand, Volvo RAC cover and the car is still well within warranty.
Submitted: 09/07/2009 09:15:49
![]()
I like this car! The handling & acceleration could be better but its not a sports car its a cruiser. Its good looking with the roof up & very good looking down!The sound system is fab, there is more airbags than a balloon race & enough cupholders not to get the silly cardboard one from maccies. My 6 year old son won’t let me change it as ’he is’ in charge of the roof button!The 5 cylinder engine sounds faster than it actually is if pushed (as the faster car overtakes). I’ve been through a set of front tyres as the car is very heavy and the no spare situation does worry me but I haven’t had to use the slime & pump supplied yet! The stoopid constant on Swedish headlights are annoying get them sorted on the service. A very nice compromise. First MOT due next week and I’ve stuck a private plate on to disguise the 06 age. So, looks like i’m a keeper!
Submitted: 06/07/2009 10:33:43
![]()
To previous complainer , the throttle taking over engine revs is because you are in too high a gear and the anti stall device takes over. Gone are the days when the car would rattle and shake when you are in too high a gear as cars are so refined these days they compensate for almost everything. Most cars have this feature. As for your air/con try reading the hand book, all cars with air/con or climate control can have their heaters and air/con on together.
Submitted: 06/07/2009 10:05:12
![]()
Had it just over a year now, it is my first company car; didn’t know my boss had got me the r design until it turned up at the office. I was like a kid at Christmas! I drive around 35000 miles a year and it has been trouble free. I drive it quite hard and at 36000 it now needs its 2nd set of rear tyres and 3rd set of fronts. I get 42/44mpg when pushing on, the seats and headrests are fantastic when doing 400 miles a day. The only real niggle is the headlights/fuel filler release/fog light buttons have not survived the conversion to RHD; there is no dashboard light for the front fogs and the button is obscured by the steering wheel. I love the huge torque and have surprised faster cars a few times. I do find the DTSC gets in the way sometimes too. The space behind the floating dash is perfect for my man bag!!!! It looks good in black but is a bitch to keep clean. I would love to try a t5d... Overall I can’t complain... it’s free after all!
Submitted: 22/06/2009 12:03:47
![]()
My last 3 cars were Volvo’s. My current 940 estate is now 13 years old with 254.000 miles. I have owned it since 1997. I have kept it in top condition by simply replacing whatever it needed. Most major parts are original. I have tried the V70s but they fail for me I am sorry to say and I am giving my car to my daughter who loves driving it particularly as it is automatic. Her children are safe in this car and of course have known it for years. For me the 940 was the last true Volvo so I am forced to look elsewhere and I will probably move over to the Ford’s. As you see I don’t agree with your statement that the V70 is the best wagon Volvo has ever built.
Submitted: 10/06/2009 09:26:08
![]()
Sat here waiting for the car to be taken into the garage (again). To add to the problems of stalling at low revs; seat belt lights and buzzer coming on (this is alarming when in the outside lane of the motorway when the bing bing alarm goes of, and no nothing on the seat). That I sorted myself by unplugging the wiring loom under the seat and plugging it back in again, 3 visits to the garage and they can’t work that out. Best one was the interior light in the passenger footwell that would not turn off (when ignition on), they couldn’t see it!! I show the sales office manager, nearly stuck his nose in it "Oh I see! Really!!!!". Driving slowly, revs suddenly drop to 0 = stalls. Radio turned itsself up to full volume, then wouldn’t switch off; £789.36 for the 36,000 miles service!!!!! Really tired of Volvo treating me like a inconvenience; the best garage they had used to understand my queries, so what did Stratstone do? Close it!!!! It has now got to the point that I dare not go too far from home despite having breakdown cover, it is the hassle and stress of thinking - "Will it start this time after I stop?".
Submitted: 28/05/2009 09:09:57
![]()
I have had the car since June 2008, arriving with optional extras of leather seats, park distance and CD changer. I have already covered 21k miles and am approaching my second service. Only had one set of front tyres at 16k miles, with the rears set for 30k miles. The drive is assured, performance more than adequate and it provides a great blend of motorway and around the town driving that my previous vehicles failed to deliver. The badge carries some prestige, without the high costs of BMW’s and Audi’s..... My only concern is cost of servicing, and I am glad this is a company car. My 12.5k miles service (at 6 months old) cost £324, and all I had extra was some wiper blades. Overall I could not be happier, and I am already looking at my next Volvo for when my car gets changed at 60k miles.
Submitted: 26/03/2009 10:06:53
![]()
My C30 is a company car, and I do about 2,000 miles a month in it. Plus points: Extremely comfortable. Seats are great, very quiet at motorway speeds. Performance from the 2.5 petrol turbo engine is good, the high torque means that the engine will cope with a range of gears for any speed - it’ll pull in 6th from 35mph (try doing that in a diesel) and it has a lovely off-beat 5 cylinder warble to it when revved. Handling & grip are good without giving a hard ride.The looks are also good, especially with the R-Design kit and 18" wheels. There still aren’t many about so it does attract attention. Sound from the ’High Performance Audio’ option is excellent, and the Premium Dynaudio version is even better still. Overall build quality, inside and out is also good, which makes it a viable and more individual alternative to the default A3 choice in this area. Especially when you can get decent engines/lots of options for a similar price to a poverty spec A3 with a puny engine. Minus Points: Only 4 seats, boot is quite small. Fuel economy for this engine isn’t great - I get a 30mpg average but it will do 45mpg if you don’t mind sitting at 55mph. Dipped headlights aren’t the best, but there is a bi-xenon option. Overall. I’ll give it 5 stars as it fits my needs perfectly. Some people may score it down for practicality, but it’s not being sold on that basis and there are plenty of other cars that fulfil this need. It offers a good blend of performance and comfort - recommended!
Submitted: 19/03/2009 09:59:10
![]()
I too have had a love hate relationship with my XC90. Bought 02/2007 for £19,800 with about 50k on the clock. I love the look and practicality of the vehicle and the fuel economy is very good when you compare it to its peers. I have just passed 80k and have had the following faults in the last 30k miles. (1) wheel bearing failure at 65k cost £200 (a common fault it seems), (2) turbo module sensor failure at 70k cost £120, (3) this is the big one, I noticed an intermittent knocking noise coming from the front soon followed by what sounded like transmission whine. It turns out that the Transfer Box / Angle Gear has disintegrated and this is going to cost £1,200 ouch! Having read various blogs on the internet etc, these always seem to fail around the 60-60k mark, so I should have been prepared for it. I have also got through a set of tyres as they were all new when I bought the car cost £450. Is 30k for a set of tyres good? I am a bit disappointed with these failures on what is supposed to be a prestige car, but when you hear some of the horror stories about Landrover Discovery's I guess you get off lightly being an XC90 owner. So if you are going to own an XC90 out of warranty make sure that you drive a good bargain when you buy the car and put the money you saved in the bank ready for some expensive repairs along the way!
Responses to this review
My 2001 Volvo XC70 has done over 180,000 km in a variety of terrains in South Africa. Until December 2009 I had had no problems whatsoever with the transfer box angle gear. That is, until I replaced the two tyres on the front wheels. I had Michellin 215/65R 16 tyres on all four wheels, having done 45,000 km by November. The treads on the rear wheels were still fine but I replaced the front tyres with Continental "4x4 Contact" tyres of the same size. In December I travelled 1,000 km down to the coast and the angle gear failed, costing me over R16,000 to replace in East London. On my way back to Johannesburg the angle box again failed! When the Volvo agant in Johannesburg examined the car he claimed that the failures were due to a difference in tyre circumference from front to back of 50 mm! That equates to 16 mm on the diameter or 8 mm on the radius! If this is such a critical aspect of the tyres, why does Volvo not highlight it in the Owner’s Handbook? Chris Hughes from South Africa
Submitted: 06/03/2009 09:51:25
![]()
The Volvo replaces my X3, which was a good car and reliable but had one serious failing ... the ’Sport’ set-up, with thin tyres, big wheels and the ability to jar ones spine running over a match stick. The Volvo is beautifully finished - vastly superior to the X3; the leather seats and ’oak’ floating switch panel make the plastics of the X3 look very cheap. With a softer ride - it is supremely comfortable; handling is positive and although a little slower than the X3, the 184 horses with the five cylinder engine do a sterling job! Well mated to the 6 speed automatic, the car has returned just over 30mpg overall (33 on a long run), which for such a solid 4WD machine, I find acceptable. Where the Volvo astonishes ... apart from its ’blind spot surveillance’ (brilliant!) ... its ’lane deviation warning’ (dips radio volume to chime a warning!) and the ’City Safety’ (as yet NOT checked out as my nerves are not up to it!) ... the intelligent cruise control which takes over control of accelerator and brakes, maintaining safe distance from the vehicle in front applying brakes or accelerating as required ... is a masterpiece of automotive engineering! It takes a while to gain confidence in this sophisticated system, but once one has trust in it ... amazing is an understatement! No faults in nearly 5000 miles; courteous dealers (who can show the BMW people how to treat a customer!) and a quality product, I commend this as a most excellent vehicle!
Submitted: 27/02/2009 09:19:36
![]()
Very good, quiet, ultra reliable car. The 2.0 Sport model is a comfortable car to drive, good handling, plenty of power when needed with reasonable fuel economy. On long journeys the cruise control is a boon! The climate control "does what it says on the tin" and during this cold weather the defrost saves all that scraping! Two minutes and the windows from front to back plus mirrors are clear. The only thing that this car needs is a rear wash/wiper. (Volvo please take note.) These cars are not cheap but you only get what you can afford .(My previous car was an Alfa Romeo). All around, one of the best cars I have owned (so far). I look forward to driving it’s successor!
Submitted: 28/01/2009 11:11:56
![]()
Does everything remarkably well. Great long distance cruiser. Good economy. Quick and comfortable. Don’t let the badge put you off! This is a serious piece of metal.
Submitted: 26/01/2009 09:58:23
![]()
Has an intermittent problem with not starting. Doesn’t matter what the weather, time of day, even after a journey. Local Volvo dealer cannot find the problem. I’ve even tried using a different make of diesel.
Responses to this review
Hi there, I have (I guess) the same problem. Has anyone given you anything more sensible since writing your review? My V50 2006 2.0D has been in the garage for a total of 5 days (over 2 occasions). They have updated software and tinkered, but still have found no root cause (although I have to say their service is outstanding!!) I’m still getting in the car not quite sure if it will start, which is not a good feeling (especially doing 2.5K miles a month!) - Grant ’Equally Fedup’ from Dorset
Submitted: 21/01/2009 09:00:59
![]()
Has anyone else found the car goes along at 20+ mph without your foot on the gas even uphill, also picks up speed going round corners so much so that I have to brake in the corner which is dangerous. I have had it into my dealer twice but they can’t find the fault on diagnostics and to be honest they do not really want to know. Also, the car steams up badly I can’t keep it clear unless I select the screen button which only works on aircon, then you can’t have the heating on as well, which in this weather is freezing. I am finding the fuel consumption poor - only getting approximately 38mpg on combined usage when statistics claim I should be getting 50+. I am so disappointed with it I am seriously thinking of getting rid, bought it for safety features but it’s the worst car I’ve had.
Submitted: 30/12/2008 15:38:33
![]()
I have had many cars ranging from £500 -£100k and I have to say - this is the best car I have every owned. I get an easy 50 mpg - if only I knew earlier! I could have saved a small fortune. Not sure about the new 2008 Volvo’s, I am keeping mine for years - done 115k and still sounds like new.
Submitted: 17/10/2008 16:07:36
![]()
Get your wheel bearings tested. Appears to be a common fault. I have had 3 out of the 4 changed. Warranty team will try and tell you it is wear and tear!!
Submitted: 26/09/2008 11:11:08
![]()
One of the best mid range car I’ve ever drove - comes with loads of extras - also came with a good service package. The car looks the biz . Test drove the A4 - the car was not a patch on the Volvo. Just one down side - I would have liked badges on the back to let people behind know what the car is.
Submitted: 22/08/2008 15:59:40
![]()
Impeccable build quality and restrained elegant styling. Deceptively quick and the twin sequential turbos are unobtrusive but give an immediate seamless power boost when most needed. Although only front wheel drive the car is sure footed and forgiving. No appreciable road or mechanical noise. A horrible fiddly sat nav system that is little used but superb comfort thanks to the best front seats in the business. A brilliant sound system and a great feeling of security and insulation from a noisy dangerous world. Space saver spare maybe OK in Europe but not sensible for Australia.The range of steering wheel and front seat adjustment guarantees long distance comfort and enables an all day drive of 600 miles to end with a fresh arrival at a restaurant for dinner. Later model has much needed rear parking sensors.
Submitted: 19/08/2008 09:05:14
![]()
Forget the T5 version and certainly don’t bother with the 2 litre engines or the even smaller ones, this is the one to have for sure! With the R-Design spec and the 18" wheels, as well, it’s transformed as ’a looker’ too. Brilliant mid-range acceleration, this will cruise all day and return mid 40s consumption at a steady (illegal) 85 on the motorway. Off the lights it’ll leave much more fancied German machines for dead and all from a wonderfully warble-y 5 cylinder engine. Sure it mightn’t handle through the bends quite as well as some of the Germans but it’ll leave them for dead on the straights and having had Audi Avants (A6s and A4s) in the past you won’t need to spend a fortune on osteopath bills to sort out your jarred bones either! I reckon these are the bargain of all bargains.......
Responses to this review
Just about to buy one. I had the 2.0 se sport for three years. What do you get to the gallon on average when driving quite hard around town? Many thanks - Jerry O’Shea from Nottinghamshire
Submitted: 15/08/2008 09:26:04
![]()
Bought the D5 SE Lux back in March 2008 - and have since clocked up 8000miles in this faultless family wagon. It easily swallows up all the luggage that is needed for a family of four on a weekend away and carries us all in ’BMW’ like comfort with leather, Air Con, and many many more home comforts as standard. The D5 mpg is good for a car of that size and weight - 30mpg urban and 39mpg motorway. Recommended.
Submitted: 13/08/2008 11:12:53
![]()
I bought this car when I changed jobs that required me to travel up and down motorways. Having owned a BMW 525 (petrol) previously, this was my first exposure to an ’oil burning’ diesel. I have now driven the car over the past 2 years completing over 40,000 miles and can honestly say I have enjoyed every mile! The Volvo eats miles with ease, and easily delivers 48-51 mpg even at 85mph+. Comfort is second to none, with plenty of power and performance for anyone. The previous owner had every extra possible fitted, (sports pack, winter pack, comms pack etc etc) My dilemma now is trying to find a car as comfortable, with equal performance and with as many ’toys’ as a company car, but unfortunately Audi A8’s BMW’s 7 series and Merc ’E’ classes do not make my available list. The mileage at present is 108,000 and in my experience is only just ’broke-in’ as it still drives fantastic! As previous comments have listed, the only down side is the turning circle. (I have 18" alloys") How can this exceptional car only now be worth £4 - 5K? I nearly forgot to mention, the Dolby surround sound hi-fi - my daughter thinks its even better than her iPod and I must agree, the noise is stunning. Having written these comments, I think I’ll keep her... sod the Volkswagen company car option! Tony.
Submitted: 13/08/2008 11:01:36
![]()
Yes, it looks great (like the wide shoulders of the car), and it puts a smile on your face looking at it and sitting in it. That is until you start the engine, which makes you check the diesel van next to you, and then you realise there is no diesel van next to you. The archaic sound comes from the stylish, sleek car you’re in! And corners are nerve breaking too. Somehow Volvo has managed to turn a very good chassis (same as Ford Focus) into a nervous, understeering and vague car that leaves you feeling disappointed. The springs and dampers don’t match, the steering feels dead and vague. It also shows the lack of rigidity of the body: probably that’s why the springs are softer than is good for the weight of the car. The autobox is probably the worst I have ever experienced (feels the same as my old 850 T5R): slow in response and not fluid enough. The turbolag of the D5 means that driving is much less relaxed than it should be: pulling away or accelerating means anticipating and often results in traction issues due to the delay in throttle response. The two rear seats are comfortable and usable for 2 adults, but with the roof down only below 30 mph. All in all: nice looking car, premium feel, but don’t expect it to drive well if you like agile, responsive and nimble cars.
Submitted: 04/08/2008 08:37:12
![]()
The 2008 Volvo S40 T5 is currently for me, a British Columbia, Canada owner, Volvo’s best offering. It is the most nimble, easy-to-park,economical, and space-efficient model of the four Volvo’s I have owned since 1982. On a long trip(such as a recent 2300km inter-provincial one which I took in June) the car’s comfortable seats, quiet air-conditioning, unflappable suspension, and fine gasoline mileage(37mpg) made it an outstanding vehicle for long-distance travel. Its sun roof made it a great platform from which to view the snowy peaks of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Around town it carries out errands( at least so far) with out faltering. No vehicle is perfect. I would like to see a more accessible glove box, an improved jack handle, and a better coin holder. Reflective safety triangles on the doors and reflective tape on the front and rear bumpers should be in place as on earlier Volvo’s. Volvo Canada has a winner in this little car and should do more to promote it in this country.
Submitted: 30/07/2008 08:25:28
![]()
Lets get the bad point out of the way... the turning circle is large especially with 17 ins wheels. It can be a pain in tight car parks. You reverse into parking slots never drive in. Small town driving in France and Italy can present a challenge. This is a great car; not just good. It sits in the drive with a Brand new Merc C Class and do you know it’s the better car in many ways. It is a true long hauler giving 48mpg when new and now after 74K 53mpg. Drive the motorways at 60 mph and it returns 63mpg - that’s about 1000 miles on a tankful of diesel. (Manual Gearbox of course) The D5 engine is truely powerful with heaps of torque over a flat range. At 80mph there is still bags of acceleration left so the published 0-60 times really don’t do the thing justice. Suspension is softish , the seating like old armchairs and the drivers position as near ideal as I’ve found. Instruments and controls are perfectly positioned although the handbrake takes a little getting used to. I love this car so much that I’m keeping it. It is easily good for another 100k. One thing to watch for is Volvo servicing and parts cost. Volvo now seem to think they’re the prima donna marque even outpricing MB and BMW. Depreciation is high so unlike me , don’t buy new.
Submitted: 14/07/2008 14:50:27
![]()
I’d just like to counter the ’low miles’ review above - three years and 80,000 miles later, this car is still tight as a drum. Averaging 50mpg on my motorway commute, leather just getting really comfortable now it’s worn in nicely! No engine problems except for the EGR valve - a common problem on all [Ford/Peugeot group] 2.0 diesels, usually an early/warranty failure if it’s going to go - mine was. Only fault was the CD autochanger failed just out of warranty - goodwill payment from Volvo; parts are expensive, however [no different from BMW, Audi, Alfa etc]. Don’t worry about the diesel engine - proven to be good for hundreds of thousands of miles if respected [oil changes/servicing etc.] Safety second to none, leather the best in the business, cruise as standard, a decent drive on 17"alloys, floating console a design classic. Prestige branding without looking like you’re in a company car; a nice sight on the motorway, different to the usual 3series/A4 middle-manager repmobiles. Looks less fussy than the Jag X type, more mature than a Focus or Golf.. If you’re after a leftfield choice, an Apple to everyone else’s PC, then it’s this, the Saab 9-3, or the Lexus 220.
Submitted: 08/07/2008 12:30:17
![]()
D5 SE all-wheel drive. Bought 2nd hand 2006 with 16k on the clock from a main agent. Fitted with the complete options list. All bells and whistles. Bargain. Recall for steering bushes inspection but all ok. Snag list some chrome strip coming away and the small speaker on the inside of the front passenger window window came off. All fixed free. Locking system went on strike for no reason which the agent fixed Now 35,229 miles. Very happy. Very comfortable. Fuel consumption on around and about local roads and town, 35 mpg (diesel). Motorway 45-48 at steady 60 mph. Drop it to average 50 mph and it will return 55 mpg. Have had six largish family plus luggage on board for 100 miles with only minor groans but they were distracted by movies on the seat screens. screens Regular servicing with main service at 12,600 and an oil/filter change at halfway. Good investment. No mechanical problems. Tyres have lasted 25,000 miles but then I do so before the regulations say and keep careful watch on pressures. Two had to be changed with deep cuts at 10,000 miles. Possible malicious. Excellent for long distance. Brake pads long lasting but I use Geartronic for braking mainly. One unhappiness is the rear brake discs rusting and having to be replaced. Watch out for changing down using Geartronic. It is possible to go to 1st at too high a speed and I suspect that will do the transmission no end of harm. Servicing is a bit pricey but you do get the feeling that is has been done well and servicing staff will answer your questions and provide explanations. Only problem. The Government VED bands that do not relate to real life.
Submitted: 04/07/2008 14:54:04
![]()
I can’t understand the previous guys statement about the car being unstable (!) - he must work for BMW/Audi/Merc as Volvo don’t make "unstable" cars. Safety is their middle name. Anyway let me share my thoughts. 1st of all I should point out that my last car was a 2006 BMW M3 Cabriolet and prior to that I flirted with an Audi A4 1.8t Cabriolet (plus I’ve owned MX5’s and other cabriolets). I was very very sceptical about spending my hard earned cash on a top of the range Volvo as I’m not exactly in what i would call Volvo’s demographic (I’m not retired/over 50 or what you would call sensible). Having owned and driven many thousands of miles in the usual German crop of sports cabriolets I’d convinced myself that their typically hard ride, high fuel consumption and ridiculous running/servicing costs of these cars was normal and acceptable. Having owned my D5 SE Lux spec C70 now for 3 months and racking up 4k miles all I can say is that you really can have your cake and eat it - the car will manage 35-40mpg to the gallon (never less than 32 even when driven like you’ve stolen it) it also has THE best seats I’ve ever parked my backside on and has a stereo thats so audiophile perfect you’d think you were listening to the artist live. Couple all this with the fact it’s got a folding hard roof, looks a million dollars and doesn’t come with the cabrio BMW/Audi/Mercedes stigma and you have a winner. Take my word for it having spent far too much money on cars in the past. The C70 is the best looking, most comfortable, most economical, best riding, best equipped 4 seater cabrio available.
Submitted: 20/06/2008 08:35:38
![]()
Had the car 6 months now, and its great. Ours has 17" wheels, and doesn’t tramline at all (we had a BMW that did!), so it does not appear to happen to all cars. Most annoying thing would be when the windows wind down, any water on the roof falls on you. Radio is superb.
Submitted: 19/06/2008 08:18:46
![]()
My wife had wanted an XC90 for some time and we finally got around to buying this one second hand, two years old, in March 2007. We both enjoy driving it, particularly the handling and the driver position, but have been disappointed by the lack of space - we have 3 grown-up kids - particularly with the two seats at the very rear, which would just about accommodate two young children comfortably. In the first row of rear seats we can only get two of ours in comfortably as a third in the middle inevitably ends up with his or her knees up under their chin. Running costs have been very high. So far in one year we have had to replace all 4 tyres, the two rear brake discs and now we have the start of what sounds like a failing wheel bearing in one of the front wheels (the rear wheel bearings had been replaced by the dealer before we bought it as part of a recall) and of course the warranty has just expired! There are a number of reports online both here in the UK and USA of XC90 wheel bearings failing at an alarming rate, which is VERY disappointing in a car of this supposed quality. Nothing associated with servicing or repairs has been anything but expensive, even going to a local independent garage. As much as we enjoy the car we are becoming increasingly concerned about the reliability and it is not what we would have expected from a high-end Volvo. My wife previously owned a V70 turbo which she ran for 8 years up to 85K miles without any real issues.
Submitted: 12/06/2008 15:37:18
![]()
My 2nd S60 - great value, fantastic comfort, excellent kit (leather, 6CD and other goodies), brilliant fuel economy @ 51 mpg
Submitted: 09/06/2008 08:57:15
![]()
We have a love/hate relationship with our XC90. We love the build, reasonable fuel consumption, comfort and space. We have, however, been plagued with problems. The first and most serious was a complete engine and gear box melt down whilst driving in France. We were flabbergasted that a car of this calibre and cost should suffer such fundamental failure at 51,000 miles and less than 4 years old (just outside warranty - arghhh!) We have also recently had suspension bushes replaced and the drive shaft imploded last week at 60,000 miles! Is this normal? Volvo tell me ’well it is quite an old car’ Well our Audi is even older at 11 years and we have never (touch wood) experienced such major failures. Perhaps we are foolish but we do intend to buy a new XC90, we are hoping that we are just very unlucky and bought a ’Friday’ car. We have looked at alternatives and feel that there is nothing else out there that offers the same space and style. We have 3 young children and 2 dogs so appreciate the large boot and 7 seats. We will however ensure we sell before the warranty expires!
Submitted: 03/06/2008 13:31:07
![]()
Car is very unstable on any uneven road surface. My model has 18" wheels as standard and Volvo admit they cannot fix the problem. Therefore they are saying they are producing a model that "tramlines" dangerously. It’s not just my car, it is ALL C70 models with wheels over 16". Unbelievable but true! This is a good car in all other respects but it spends more time in the air than on the road surface. If you like a steering wheel that is jerking all over the show, buy this car.
Submitted: 15/05/2008 12:17:58
![]()
I bought the S60 R when it first came out in 2003 and it has given me five years of trouble-free motoring. When people think of reliability it is normally the German brands BMW, Audi and Volkswagen that come first to mind but I think that this doing Volvo a disservice, they fully deserve to be mentioned alongside them. The S60 is as comfortable on the motorway as it is in the towns and villages. If you want good fuel economy then you should choose the diesel option. It is surprisingly enjoyable to drive, performance and handling are very good. Interior and exterior show great attention to detail.
Submitted: 01/05/2008 14:46:06
![]()
Mine is the S70 with 146k on the clock, runs so smooth, safe and goes like the wind this is my 8th Volvo. Wouldn’t have any other!
Submitted: 31/03/2008 10:31:09
![]()
This is the first Vovo I’ve owned as I’ve always been put off by its ’boring but safe’ image but this is a really nice car and not boring at all to drive. It’s only a 4 seater so may not suit everyone but it suits us perfectly as a work and family car and is cheaper than the Audi A3 but built on the same spec. The wife really likes the interior and I have to say it is very comfortable and uncluttered. Far from finding the safety features boring (now I have a 8 month old) they are very reassuring - we have taken the option of the ’Magic Eye Mirrors’, which at £350 weren’t cheap but I think money well spent as my wife has always been nervous before about motorway driving but as these mirrors light up when someone is in your blind spot she’s a lot more confident. Running costs are extremely economical and all in all I think this is a very good choice if you’re looking for a family car with a bit of a difference.
Submitted: 29/03/2008 13:16:46
![]()
I purchased a second hand XC70 from a Volvo dealer a few weeks ago. The vehicle was tested on what now appears to be smooth road, and no test was made on any other road surface. I am now somewhat appalled at the road noise, even a very low speeds, i.e. less than 5 miles per hour, the dealer stated that this was normal? I can’t believe that Volvo would produce a vehicle that has this very marked ’fault’, would others respond and give views.
Submitted: 17/03/2008 16:45:10
![]()
I’ve had my V70 for 6 months now and I’m very pleased indeed with it’s performance. It’s everything you would expect of a Volvo, solid, safe and reliable but I think it’s anything but boring. There are not many cars that I have driven that I would give 5 stars to but this one really does deserve the highest praise.
Submitted: 16/03/2008 14:18:19
![]()
I’m delighted with my new V70. The fit and finish puts many more expensive cars to shame. The 2.4D is economical, yet has more than enough, smoothly delivered, power to cruise at 80-90mph. It’s no "hot hatch" in handling terms, but, then again, why should it be....
Submitted: 13/02/2008 14:31:08
![]()
Great economy, great performance, enough toys, quiet enough for 500 mile days, inoffensive Bad points, poor turning circle, poor rear legroom, low height of tailgate when open (I’m only 5’8") slightly soggy handling (I should have paid more for the sports suspension) This is my fourth Volvo estate, I’m looking for another because I can’t find anything that does the job better at a sensible price.
Submitted: 14/01/2008 12:00:17
![]()
Excellant car would have got 5 stars except for recalls and part failures Wishbone replaced under recall. Wheel bearings collapsed at 20,000 miles (scary) Ignition lock failed on a car that is just over 3years old with just 28,000 miles done was told wear and tear .First time ever this has happened to me with nearly 30 years motoring behind me my 20 year old ford cortinas ignition lock never failed strange. interior trim falls to bits. Steering Rack failed at just over 3 years old and 26,000 miles was told pot holes would cause this god help me if i ever took it off road. this happened on my ford at 19 years old and 180,000 miles. TV/DVDs stopped working replaced under warrenty. fuel economy good for a big car 25 to 30 mpg
Submitted: 02/01/2008 16:29:37
![]()
Cheers: Fuel efficient Comfortable Flexible The total economy makes it a good buy. Jeers: Overpriced Comments: The most environmental Volvo so far beside the C30 1,6D. It’s easy to get a brief overview, easy to reach and easy to use the buttons, they are accessable and approachable. There’s been a lot of talk about the cup holders and where to storage junk but hey isn’t it like that if you don’t have anywhere to storage it, it wont be left there. Overall , it’s exactly what I had expected where fuel consumption, station-wagon,environmental awareness and the overall total economy were my top issues. I went from a petrol driven VW Golf III 1,6 -03 to the brand new Volvo V50 1,6 Diesel and SAVED about a ? 50 a month (I drive long distances). This was one of my best car buys I’ve done. If I wasn’t in need of a station wagon (my dog) I’d go for the C30 1,6D Efficiency that comes out this spring and save even more money. But unfortually that car is too small for us. I will for sure test drive it though and see what I will miss.
Submitted: 12/12/2007 09:21:24
![]()
I like the car very much to be this small engine and low consuming it is nice to drive. BUT several 3times noe the engine have suddenly lost power during driving. the engine dont rev over 2800rpm and max speed is around 60kph The volvo dealer have not been able to trace the error and complain that it is so hard to investigate due to that the error is gone when they recive the vehicle. Problem is temporarly gone when when cykle the ignition - and workshop are never open in the evenings or hollidays when it happens. please could anyone with similar problem send the VIN number so I can Investigate what the solutions have been for your cars d.andersson@hrmritline.se
Submitted: 07/12/2007 09:09:50
![]()
I’ve had this car 12 months and it’s a blinder! I would never have considered a Volvo before but this is something special. It drives like a dream and has all the comfort you would expect from a far more expensive car. They’ve stopped producing these now, which is a shame but definately worth getting second hand like mine. A very classy car.
Submitted: 26/11/2007 12:44:27
![]()
Everything you expect from a Volvo, practical, safe and spacious but not exciting.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:11:25
![]()
Proof that Volvo can produce an attractive car. Excellent, reliable engines and solidly built.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:02:36
![]()
I am very pleased that I chose this Estate. It has very comfortable and supportive seats, which my wife finds very comfortable as she has a bad back. It is a lovely car to drive and once you get used to there being no handbrake (you find yourself grabbing for it and finding thin air, which can be disconcerting at first) you soon get used to the fact it’s electronic. Very spacious and of course it’s a very safe car to be in. Very well designed all round.
Submitted: 21/11/2007 21:31:49
![]()
No review submitted.
Submitted: 14/11/2007 09:31:14
![]()
Reliable, safe and pratical, as you’d expect from a Volvo. The V50 is a lot better looking than most Volvos and has some nice sporty details inside. Great to drive and handles perfectly. I’m extremely pleased with this car. I’m only giving it 4 out f 5 because there is a little more engine noise than I would like but I wouldn’t say it’s intrusive. Very good car.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 21:04:14
![]()
A less common alternative to the Audi A3. Nice to drive.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 10:43:43
![]()
My Volvo has excellent handling, nice dashboard layout & comes with a good spec, but is quite bumpy & not really that well refined. Quite cheap to buy as a 2-3 year old car.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 10:38:12
![]()
The 7 seats makes this off-roader perfect form my extended family. Both the interior and the exterior are built to last and are built using quality materials. This a quality 4x4 and Volvo have got everything spot on. The steering column can be adjusted for comfort and the car offers a pleasant ride with the minimum of noise. The only reason I have not awarded the XC90 5 stars is due to the fuel economy which is not the best at arounf 20mpg.
Submitted: 22/10/2007 12:21:03
![]()
I do some hefty motorway mileage both for work and personally so I wanted something I could do it in in real comfort and having 3 kids safety was paramount. This is a fabulous car and the safety spec is second to none. Very comfortable drive and massive amount of space. Excellent.
Submitted: 12/10/2007 15:31:44
![]()
Good looker however not completely free from its faults The 1.6d would have not been my first choice however this was company car, and so the tax was considerably low for a car in its class. The 1.6d is quite refined an I am impressed by the engine management as Volvo seem to know how to get the best performance from a small diesel engine.. The main problem is that I don’t think Volvo planned the S40 1.6d to be a high miler. My car is a 56 plate, Nov 06, and it now as 27000 on the clock. There seems to be a issue with the intercooler as mine was replaced at 20000 miles. Maybe the turbo’s working overtime to get the best out of the 1.6d?. The annoying thing with this car is that, should the cars on board computer detect the slightest fault, this will take over and limit the cars performance. Should this occur the car would only do a maximum of 60mph on a flat road, reducing to about 30-40mph even on a slight incline and is not ideal when away on business! This happened 3 times until Volvo finally replaced the intercooler. The air con has also stopped working which, has been addressed by Volvo however, 3 visit to the garage later the air cons still not working! My colleges have also had issues with the 2ltr petrol, as they seem to cut out and having said this, one of my college had the contract ended early as he claimed the cars was not fit for purpose due to on going problems with the loss of power. Overall, I wouldn’t really suggest the s40 as a fleet car however, problems do happen and having driven the S40 2.4i SE, this is the model I would recommend however, only for low mileage users!
Submitted: 20/09/2007 09:07:52
![]()
Excellent quality, wonderful to drive. This car is fantastic on long journeys with the children and full of luggage.
Submitted: 19/09/2007 11:12:53
![]()
If you are looking for a family car with high comfort and that is exceptional to drive, look no further. This car is so well thought out I really can’t think of a single thing to mark it down. 10 out of 10, well done Volvo.
Submitted: 08/08/2007 15:42:50
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |