25 May 2012
Follow us / Subscribe to newsletter
Consumer reviews by category
Useful information
| Tweet |
5
out of
5
based on
0 consumer reviews
![]()
Read all 0 reviews
Have your say!
Recent responses | Recent questions | Recent answers
Renault Kangoo Van Maxi road test reports and car reviews. Submit your own review of the Renault Kangoo Van Maxi, read other driver's opinions or visit the best road test web sites available on the web.
Renault Kangoo Van Maxi consumer reviews by year of make:
Questions
Answers
We are afraid that there are currently no reviews on the Renault Kangoo Van Maxi.
Be the first to review this model!
Listed below are the latest 20 reviews on vehicles from the same manufacturer.
![]()
I bought my Megane second hand at the end of 2010 and it’s the most expensive mistake I ever made. I chose the car because it looked great and was a quiet comfortable ride; however problems began to appear soon after I hit 50,000 miles. 1. The biggest issue was the handbrake; the flimsy plastic button you are meant to press to release it snapped somewhere inside the mechanism leaving me unable to take the handbrake off (parked facing downhill on a VERY steep hill in front of a skip!). It would have cost around £250 to get it fixed at Renault, luckily I found the part through a breakers yard for £90 and had a kind mechanic replace it for me for £20. Still an expense to be avoided and an apparently common problem. 2. Another issue I had is that one of the engine coils somehow got wet and rusted, resulting in a complete lack of power to the engine, fixed for £200! 3. The boot stopped opening just after Christmas 2011. The boot space was a plus point with this car but no good if you can only get into it through the back seats! I tested it every few weeks to see if it would open again and finally, at the end of April 2012, it did! I assume it had got damp, not surprising when every time I opened the boot if it had been raining, I had to stand back while all the water drained off the boot. 4. Began to judder when driving, particularly in 3rd gear, I didn’t bother to get this problem sorted and got rid of it instead. 5. Fuel economy was terrible, never got more than 35mpg out of it. 6. The plastic on the handles inside the car doors started to peel off on its own and looked horrible. Every year when I had an annual service on the car it ended up costing me around £500. The parts are expensive and I would never ever even consider buying another Renault, best thing it was good for was as a part exchange and I now have a nice, reliable Ford Fiesta. My advice? Don’t go near these cars!
Submitted: 2012-05-10 | ID: 9321 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this van second hand from my friend who had it from new. I had to replace the turbo pressure sensor and the boost sensor together for £90 total. I had to replace the clutch slave cylinder in the transmission bell-housing, cost Approx £40, and recently I had to replace the MAF sensor due to me damaging it whilst doing an annual clean, when I changed the air filter. It is a brilliant van, which I try to service it every 18months. The mileage is 117600 and the van drives without fault. There are lots of bad reviews on these vans, but I can only assume they are from people flogging the vans guts out, people saying "van wont rev passed 3800rpm" well that’s the red line stupid, I never send my van passed 3000rpm. It pulls like a train and I don’t need it to go any more! I believe the vast majority of owners don’t know a lot about these vans, I would recommend you buy one of these vans from someone who services it themselves and can show receipts to prove you need not bother with main dealers unless you have to. My friend bought a Trafic from main dealer second hand and had bad clutch judder when pulling away. The main dealer said is was "characteristic" and told him to get used to it. I decided to investigate and suggested that we have a look at the clutch plate, so started stripping down at 08.00. I took front end off the van and found that the clutch plate was not aligned on the flywheel correctly; I never use an alignment too, l just use my sight and feel around the edges of the plate and the edge of the flywheel for even distance. There was plenty of meat left on the plate so I didn’t even bother changing the clutch, I just re-aligned it and put back together again. At 18.30 the van was up and running with no clutch judder! I really do believe that if you look after any car/van it will not let you down, although my cam belt did snap, but only because I did not change the timing belt when recommended, I did an extra 24,000 and she finally snapped, oh dear, bent valves, cost me £1900. I’m only a DIY mechanic at best and with hindsight I should have got a second hand engine and just changed it. Oh well, we all learn the hard way. To summarise: A good van if serviced. It suffers silly sensor problems, but these are easily rectified, for less than £200 for all the sensors; sensors are the biggest gremlin of these vans, lack of power, starting problems, idling issues are in my experience are all sensor related and all can be purchased from motor factors. I get excellent fuel consumption 645miles on a tank, don’t thrash it, 2000-3000 rpm max, 85mph max. A good van and at least it won’t rust away like a Vito or a Transit.
Submitted: 2012-05-09 | ID: 9314 | 5/10
![]()
My 2010 car started giving false error messages from day one until today 1/5/2012; from brakes fault, doors open, switching from brake peddle to clutch peddel to start, not starting, not opening by remote, battery going flat, radio works, but satnav doesn’t or vise versa. Bury Renault have rebooted the cars computers 3 times and today they say it’s the car battery that’s the problem. The car as been returned to me with the electrics working like they’re on mogadon!
Submitted: 2012-05-09 | ID: 9309 | 1/10
![]()
I’ve had this car 3 years. I’m a lady driver and rarely go over 70mph, but it does get a fair amount of use with monthly trips to London and lots of town use. Apart from parts replaced due to wear and tear it’s never let me down and although it’s not the most economical car I’ve ever had, it’s on 113k and the engine purrs! I have no intention of changing it.
Submitted: 2012-05-06 | ID: 9302 | 4/10
![]()
My last Renault Trafic did 130,000 miles in 3 year without fault. Tyres, Service and Brakes is all it ever needed. I drive up and down to Spain every 2 months or so. I slept, ate, drove and camped in it with my three cats. It pulled a 26ft caravan and a disability scooter,(inside) and two people most of its life. I’ve just bought a brand new Renault Trafic, which drives and looks even better than the last one and will be put through the same hectic life style as the other one was. The point is, look after your vehicle and it will look after you no matter what the make or model and it helps to have a good, helpful, and trustworthy mechanic. Despite the stories My Automatic Trafic runs fine. As did My Automatic Ford Transit a few years back. Have fun.
Submitted: 2012-05-02 | ID: 9297 | 5/10
![]()
This van has been a nightmare from start to finish. I have now had it just over 18 months and it has cost me over £4,000 in repairs; it has needed two gear boxes, clutch repaired twice, pump, netrack rod ends, break discs and pads. You name it! It has almost put me out of business as I can’t afford the repair bills. Run away. Seriously, run!
Responses to this review
Firstly you bought it second hand, you don’t really know it’s history. but if the first gearbox went then see the garage that sold you the first one. Same answer for the clutch. The rest, well I take it you bought it as seen? I’ve had a Renault traffic since 2006 then 2009 and now a brand new one. None of them have even seen a repair shop except for services. Yours is very old and near the end of its life. All I can say is choose carefully next time where you buy and repair from - Stellar Andrews from Sussex
I agree with Stellar, I had a 2008 Trafic for just over 3 years and now have a late 2011 Euro 5 model and have not encountered a problem with either apart from 2 recalls dealt with during routine servicing. I think very highly of these vans and would be happy to recommend them. The newer ones have even more relaxed high speed cruising ability and I am getting another 3 mpg too overall - Steve from England
Submitted: 2012-04-23 | ID: 9266 | 1/10
![]()
This is the worst car I have ever had the misfortune to purchase. On its test drive it drove mint; it was a very comfortable and well-equipped vehicle (reverse parking sensors, 6 speed, air con, electric everything etc). If anyone is considering buying one of these - don’t! Enjoy the test drive, then walk away. I bought it from auto-trader and within two weeks the stupid credit card key had broken meaning a ridiculous locking the car process ensued. It has black smoke every 20 miles or so, loves drinking oil and had the worst petrol consumption of any car I have ever owned, upto and including a 3.0 petrol BMW! Walk away!
Submitted: 2012-04-16 | ID: 9235 | 1/10
![]()
Dont bother! In the first week of ownership the roof broke, then 2 months later we woke up to find a free extra "swimming pool" that had leaked through the roof. Renault never got to the bottom of this after much investigation, so I solved issue with the help of B&Q (Thanks Renault!), then two weeks ago my aircon broke and a strong burning smell filled the car. Now today my rear window has stuck and is now open about 3 inches. I took it to Renault Liverpool, who agreed to pay 62% towards fixing it as it’s a well known fault with this make of car, however, the bill still came in at £435.78 "for a window motor". Never, ever will I buy another Renault. Its only saving grace is its looks, but hey, it’s not always about the looks is it?
Submitted: 2012-04-11 | ID: 9219 | 2/10
![]()
Hi, I bought my Megane CC in 2006 and I’ve never had any problems, it’s a very good car. I own a 1.6 vvt 115cv not diesel and I’ve been to Italy four times in it with no problems. I’m thinking to change it with the new model.
Submitted: 2012-03-21 | ID: 9159 | 5/10
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
![]()
I purchased my Scenic Privilege in 2004 and I had it for just over 3 years. When it was just out of warranty I had to pay for a window regulator costing £295. I kept the car in immaculate condition and sold it to my daughter when I purchased another.(Mine has been reasonably trouble free). My daughter had it one month when the engine developed a fault and had to be replaced. One year later the gearbox had to be replaced. It has also had 3 more window regulators, a heater fan, an electric roof and door mirror faults. Because The car was originally mine the guilt clicked in with regards to all these faults so I have contributed £££’s to keep her on the road. I am told the new Scenic is a better engineered car, but I would be nervous about buying another!
Submitted: 2012-03-13 | ID: 9120 | 2/10
![]()
I should have spent the extra £1000 on a Berlingo or older Connect, this van is plain nasty. It’s a very clean van with only 30,000mls on the clock, but boy the engine is a real dog. It rattles and makes noises, has no power and it does 45-50 mpg at the most. Compared to my new shape Berlingo or the 07-08 and 09 Connects we have it’s a peace of old junk. I think they put a new body on a very old van. It’s ugly, but looked quite nice sign written. I spend 3 hours a day in the cab and it’s a harsh place to be. It’s truly guttless and old school, my Escort van would beat this off the lights. It’s been reliable so far, but I’m not sure I can live with it. Buy a Berlingo for comfort or a Connect for work. Simple.
Submitted: 2012-03-10 | ID: 9114 | 1/10
![]()
A really well equipped, good looking car with good fuel economy, especially for motorway driving. But the electrics are very unreliable. Apparently if you get a good example of the car, they’re brilliant, but an unreliable one just breaks down again and again. I clearly got a dud. My worst experience though is with the dealership network. Every repair seems to carry an eye watering cost (a couple of times I’ve been given prices of £2000 plus), and they always quote for extensive parts replacement that other garagaes say isn’t necessary in order to be able to guarantee the repair. Renault is a terrible used car choice.
Submitted: 2012-03-06 | ID: 9092 | 2/10
![]()
I have a 1.4 16v petrol. I have only had it for 9 days and so far I have only been able to drive it about 15 miles. First the water pump went, which cost me £300 to get replaced as I had to have a new cam belt kit fitted aswell. Now the radiator has gone and for some reason it keeps cutting out on me, which I have been told could be the rocker cover gasket and spark plugs and coils that need replacing, costing me a further £670. The car cost me £975 and as you can guess I am not happy and am now going through solicitors to take the bloke I bought the car off to the small claims court as he may as well have given me the car as in total it’s going to cost me £970 to get it running properly!
Submitted: 2012-02-19 | ID: 9031 | 2/10
![]()
Update: At 101,000 miles mine has needed new wiper blades, new discs, new pads, new steering rack and a new track control arm. Upon getting it back from the garage, no brakes, a loss of power steering when braking, the new steering rack was faulty and the track control arm loose. All this and a bill of over a thousand quid! You have got to be joking?!! So I have changed my mind, Renault vans are rubbigh, and this one is still under the unlimited 2 years warranty, but the warranty is not worth the paper it’s printed on! They don’t really care, they just take your money and run.
Responses to this review
A 2007 model still under 2 year guarantee? - Steve from England
Submitted: 2012-02-13 | ID: 9008 | 1/10
![]()
We have had this van from new and it has been a reliable vehicle. We didn’t really have anything done to it until 50,000 miles when it had new breaks all round. The tyres average 40,000 miles and we get around 34 mpg as it is always fully loaded; this is very good as our Mercedes Vito only manages 26 miles to the gallon.
Submitted: 2012-02-13 | ID: 9004 | 5/10
![]()
Quite a clever design, but far too many problems together with poor build quality and too frequent trips to the garage. The electronics and gizmos are far too clever for their own good and were never going to last beyond the car’s first few years. I wouldn’t buy a Renault again as although they’re quite nice to drive, I will say that, they are not worth the bother.
Submitted: 2012-02-13 | ID: 8991 | 2/10
![]()
Our car caught fire just after my husband came back from work anf the fire brigadge had to be called to extinguish it. The car had given us constant headaches with endless problems that have cost us approx. £3000 in repairs. We will never buy a French car again. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Submitted: 2012-02-06 | ID: 8957 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car 6 months ago and I love it. It’s very economical, very good in corners and for a price very well equiped. I know it’s French, but they finally started to build good quality cars. It is only 6 months old, but if anything goes wrong, I will post.
Submitted: 2012-02-02 | ID: 8945 | 5/10
![]()
This is my first dci. I do not like this car, it has cost me a lot of money.
Submitted: 2012-01-31 | ID: 8940 | 2/10
![]()
I bought the car with 17k miles on it when it was 3 years old. In the first year I had it the wipers somtimes didn’t work and the windows sounded as if they were about to pack up, although they never have, but the nearside one is jerking now. In the second year the engine started to misfire so I replaced the igintion coils and it has been ok since then. In the third year the car needed all the discs replacing at 40k; I am not a heavy breaker and this is the first car in 30 years of driving that I have ever needed to replace discs. The Check emmission light came on so I had the cam sensor changed as this was the fault showing, but to no effect. The emmisions have been check several times and are ok, but the light still comes The car was also recalled at this time for a handbreak modification. Now in the forth year of ownership the VVT pulley started to rattle so I had it changed and the timing belt. The car at this time had got 50k on it. One week later the car failed its MoT as the parking brake seized in the off position and needs not only a new caliper but the whole electronic handbrake unit, which is very costly. This is the third Renault I have owned, the last one being the MK 1 Scenic from new and I had no issues with that car. Would I buy another Renault again? Never, never, never! When it’s fixed I am getting shut.
Submitted: 2012-01-30 | ID: 8937 | 1/10
![]()
This model is superior to the last one I had (Mk 2), but having said that I had to get one suspension front mounting kit replaced under warranty. The Start/Stop Button has pushed in as whatever plastic clips that hold it have broken. The dealer techicians say this is not warranted and was forced as they have researched and have never heard of anything like this. I am bitterly dissapointed and will be switching to a different make.
Submitted: 2012-01-30 | ID: 8936 | 4/10
![]()
I wish I had the Megane instead of the E-Class Merc I have. I bought the car for my wife second-hand at 1 year old and it has never let her down. The mileage is now 135,000 and it never misses a beat. Having experience of all types of cars I would definitely recommend buying one. The Merc has let me down 14 times in 2 years and with only 30,000 miles on the clock, so much for German quality!
Submitted: 2012-01-23 | ID: 8885 | 4/10
![]()
This is an update on my last report on my 2010 Renault Trafic: I have now covered almost 100,000 miles. The only repairs so far are 1 wiper blade and garage said there is slight wear on the track rod end, which is not covered by warranty. I explained to the garage the one on the other side is ok so it’s a manufacturing fault, which we all know it is, so I want it fixed under the terms of the warranty. It’s still running on the original discs and has still never missed a beat. It’s still the most reliable van I have ever driven, but to my dismay there is a rust hole on the passenger door. This will be fixed under the paint warranty. My transport manager has just informed me that my van will be swapped for a Ford Transit at the next changeover. I will keep you all posted. P.S. My van is fully loaded at all times.
Submitted: 2012-01-17 | ID: 8870 | 5/10
![]()
I had done 120,000 in my van with all parts going the distance. Problems only arose with replacement parts, getting only 15000 miles from a new clutch and 3000 from a spring! I could go on, but the point is and my mechanic is a reputable Renault mechanic and he agrees Renault are using substandard parts!
Submitted: 2012-01-16 | ID: 8854 | 4/10
![]()
My Trafic has done 178,000 miles and is still going strong. It starts and runs perfectly. The van is driven only by me, but still gets a good drive, only when warm, and is serviced every 6k without fail. Looking after the engine and greasing wearing parts keeps these vans working perfectly. My father bought the same van at the same time and has had nothing but problems; up to 76k it had issues with the fuel pump, altenator, starting/not starting, elec faults, but it had never been looked after/serviced adequately and does very hard days work. He would never recommend Trafics and he now has an 07 Transit which after 165k has never missed a beat even though it does get abused, but takes it better than the Trafic!
Submitted: 2012-01-04 | ID: 8802 | 5/10
![]()
Well... 5 out of 6 vans did have the turbo or head gasket replaced at 60K to 80K motorway miles from new (carried light trade tools, not bricks max 400 kg) and achieved 32-35 mpg. Also experienced all sorts of electrical problems and ball joints as standard going off each at 30K. Another company, same Traffic but 2009 model: Endless electrical problems on all 40 out of 40 vans; service lights coming one, or at night-time the headlights start moving up or down, or both headlight bulbs go after just 2 weeks of being newly fitted. Steering has light/heavy dead bands, so you can oversteer. The clutch was adjusted on many of the vans at 50-60K, then new one at 90K. Some vans survived clutch replacement to 100-110K, but no longer. Now a Vivaro, the ball joints, fish bones each needed replacing at 10-15K. Now at 70K and it has black smoke. Heating/air con on all vans above is good but it is impossible to adjust the temperature. Aircon on many vans was out of use by the second year due to leaking gas. All the vans did have problems with door locks and windows lift mechanisms. The radio has poor reception on the Trafic/ Vivaro and is very unstable on cornering. It is also not good on speed bumps when compared with a Toyota Hiace. The good bit is it’s more comfortable to drive than a VW T5, but the Transit has better back support (I bought a Transit for myself).
Submitted: 2012-01-02 | ID: 8780 | 1/10
![]()
The designer of the Modus needs his head examined. Who in their right mind would make a car that you have to take off the front to change a bulb? Has anyone tried to change the fuel filter on the 1.5DCI? It’s not the easiest, tucked away behind the offside wheel arch. I have had to fit 2 new front coil springs after 55000 and it can be heavy on tyres. The spare wheel is another gripe, my last car was 7 years old when I sold it, the spare had never been on and went with the car like new. The spare tyre on the Modus is underneath and looks as if it should be 25 years old. It is also rubbish when you have to change tyres with a stupid cable affair; if you want to stay clean you need to call some one out. The Renault main dealers think that your pockets are lined with gold with the prices they charge. Otherwise the car is not too bad.
Responses to this review
What is your actual mpg please? - Marty Cleary from County Tyrone
Submitted: 2011-12-27 | ID: 8752 | 3/10
![]()
I have a 2002 Renault Trafic lwb, which has now done 159,000 and has never let me down. It’s reguarly serviced and has only needed: 1 steering pump, 1 ball joint and 2 trackrod ends (I do mount kerbs a lot being a window cleaner), new gear cables, 2 cam belts and I have just fitted an air flow sensor and that’s all. The engine and gearbox are very quiet and still work like new, but fuel consuption for work averages 42 mpg. I do not accelerate too hard or over-load the van, as this will cause gearbox problems and lower mpg. I am a fast driver and still get high fuel consuption. I have had many makes of vans and this is the best van I have ever owned. If you look at all the forums for different makes of vans you would never buy one at the end of the day, but if you look after it and treat it well it will look after you.
Submitted: 2011-12-22 | ID: 8749 | 5/10
![]()
Save £2745 If you have a Renault by getting rid of it - NOW! If you’re thinking of buying one - DON’T. Congratulations you have just saved yourself £2745! I have just been stung for this amount to fix the gearbox on a 3.5 year old Renault Laguna (59,000 miles): Dual mass flywheel, clutch, bearings and idler gear. I took the car to a Renault Dealer (Ness Motors, Perth), who couldn’t diagnose the cause of the whine from the gearbox. I took the car to James Allan (gearbox specialist in Edinburgh), who diagnosed the "Renault gearbox problem" in 2 minutes flat. There’s a design fault with this dual mass flywheel arrangement (common across many, if not all Renault gearboxes), which everybody seems to know about apart from Renault, who washed their hands of the problem. Real classy Customer Service - NOT!!
Submitted: 2011-12-22 | ID: 8748 | 1/10
![]()
I have a 55 plate Renault Megane sports tourer with 38,000 miles on the clock. I bought it 2 years ago with 19,000 miles on the clock. We have had nothing but problems with it since. It’s been serviced regularly and looked after, but now things seem to be going wrong. The cam belt needed changing, the head gasket went, the gear box got replaced and now the engine is juddering causing the whole car to shake violently with all the engine management lights coming on! I have paid 2 years finance on it and still have 2 years to pay! I cannot afford to get the car fixed and grudge paying for a car that is not in working order. I now question whether Renault knew that the car was not in the best of condition when they sold me it and why the previous owner traded it in at 19000 miles. Stay clear of this make and model!
Submitted: 2011-12-22 | ID: 8744 | 1/10
![]()
Hi! I bought the car new in July 2010 after having an earlier 2008 model. From day one this car has suffered with clutch noise when the pedal is pressed down. I returned it to the dealer for a checkup and after keeping it for diagnostics (lol) for 3 days it was returned back to me saying it was a characteristic of that model and not to worry as they all sound the same. complaint after complaint followed for the same fault and finally after 15 months and Renault Technical, France getting involved my dealer wants to take my car back in for another look at it. Great news, only there is a good chance that they are going to keep it over Christmas if they have to order some ’special parts’. Great cars, but rubbish customer service. Update to follow when I get it back.
Submitted: 2011-12-19 | ID: 8736 | 4/10
![]()
I have the 1.2 version of this, which I bought second hand two months ago. I have MS and needed something high to be able to sit into. I got this against my better judgement as my previous car had to be scrapped and so was stuck for a car. There were a few things wrong with it when I was buying it: Passenger side window switch was not working, a parking light was gone, the middle air vents were not working and were sealed shut with sellotape! Also there was a screeching noise from the front when starting and moving off and the car was pulling badly to the left. The garage fixed these, eventually; they told us they were all fixed and then we realised that it was still pulling to the left and that air vents had only had the tape removed from them. It is now making a crazy screeching noise from the back when pulling off in first gear, but of course it wouldn’t do it when I tried to show the garage. Apart from that, it is seriously underpowered for the size of the thing, and I curse and swear at it every day on my commute to and from work. On the positive side, it is amazingly roomy and the seat is nice and high for me. I don’t think I would ever recommend one to anyone though.
Responses to this review
I have exactly the same problem with my 207. It’s in the garage now, they are going to try changing the lock but think it may be a wiring fault so they’re going to have to strip the door down to look further. If the lock change doesn’t work... which sounds expensive! Helen M from Berkshire
Submitted: 2011-12-19 | ID: 8733 | 2/10
![]()
Two weeks ago a head lamp went. My son spent over two hours taking the front of the car off in order to get to the lamp. Seriously, you have to detach the body work at the front of the car, how crazy is that? Today, once again, when all the garages are closed, the other lamp has gone. This means we have to do without a lamp until a garage can book it in as a job next week. You have to undo screws underneath the car, above in the engine, and then in the wheel arch. Then you have to remove the front body work above the bumper. Only then can you begin to think about how to change the bulb. This is a serious safety flaw with this car. You ought, for your own safety, be able to change a bulb without it being booked in to be done by a garage for a lot of money. The bulb went on Saturday evening, which means we have to drive illegally until after the weekend. I will never, ever buy a car with this design fault again. My advice? Don’t buy one.
Submitted: 2011-12-12 | ID: 8705 | 1/10
![]()
Not strictly a Renault because it has a Nissan badge. It now has 180,000 miles on the clock from new April 2006 and it is running smoother than ever. Just a great, great vehicle. It had a new clutch at 145,000 and probably needs an Ambient Air Sensor replacing too, but nothing to be worried about. I’m going to buy another, but LWB on the understanding that they are all built by Renault. However reading the reviews am I sensible to move from the Nissan brand when I understand they are the same vehicle anyway badged by different Manufacturers?
Responses to this review
All Renault/Vauxhall/Opel/Nissan low roofs are built in the same place at Luton. It’s really down to what dealership you prefer - Steve from England
Railway tack crock sensor - Thirumalai Thirumalaij from India
Submitted: 2011-12-09 | ID: 8687 | 5/10
![]()
Please be aware of Renaults! If you don’t mind spending all your hard cash on clutches and new gearboxes buy one. Renault are running their company like a casino. I have been into cars for a long time and owned a clio dci 80, which had lots of small problems. I am not being bitter, I just know what I have seen over a long period.
Submitted: 2011-12-07 | ID: 8681 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car new in September 2004, but had to wait for 6 weeks as there weren’t any available. Renault delivered on time with 11 miles on the clock. The car has now done 130,000 miles and is still going strong. There have been a few issues: Drivers window opened itself and wouldn’t close. Passenger door leaked into the door pocket. Injector light kept coming on. Renault sorted out the issues quickly. The injector light still comes on if I use Supermarket petrol, so I don’t. I must say I love the car. It carries me and my family, surf boards, camping gear, suitcases and the kitchen sink. It never complains and starts first time, every time. Still looks good inside and out. I am now looking for another one. Yes they are Renaults. Yes they aren’t perfect but I have mine serviced at Ford and they tell me it will last forever. If you want one buy one. Don’t let others tell you it’s no good. Be aware they need to be driven quite hard as they don’t like pottering about. If you need a short distance car don’t buy the diesel as it will clog up the particle filters. Low tax, good fuel consumption, low insurance. Love it.
Submitted: 2011-12-05 | ID: 8666 | 4/10
![]()
I have given it only 4 stars as I have a family to move about. A single guy or a couple just wanting a fun sports cars and it is 5+ stars. Goes like a bat out of hell and grips the road as if glued to it, even in the tightest corners it says "I can do the corner tighter". Puts a huge smile on your face to drive and is the best driving car I have driven. Great car for a petrol head, and I have been in a few. I loved the short time it has been my company car, but sadly it isn’t suitable for my cirscumstances and has to go back soon.
Submitted: 2011-11-30 | ID: 8654 | 4/10
![]()
Beware!! This van is the biggest pile of rubbish I have EVER owned. It had 60,000 miles when I purchased it, which should be nothing for a diesel right? Wrong! At 72,000 the gearbox went up the shute, costing £1500 repair. At 80,000 the air mass sensor went costing £400. At 85,000 the power steering pump went costing £500. For it’s M.O.T. it had massive oil leaks and needed the steering drop arm, and ball joints and the load sensing valve for the brakes had just fallen off. All in all it cost £950 in repairs! At 93,000 it had more oil leaks, the turbo oil feed pipes and another drop arm costing another £300. Now, to cap it it all at just over 100,000 the engine has seized solid and no, it’s not a broken cam belt. Nobody has any idea what is up. Renault’s price for a new engine is £2320 plus £800 fitting plus V.A.T. Avoid at all costs!
Responses to this review
Same here mate, bought van brand new ’08 plate and now has 89k on the clock. At 36k, it needed a new power steering pump which the dealer replaced under warranty. At around 70k, it was the track rod ends and bits and bobs, no big deal. At 76k, the timing chain snapped and mangled the whole engine resulting in a replacement. After labour and parts (replaced clutch whilst engine was removed), this cost £3,750. I got the van back and after six weeks on the road, a bus hit my rear end and smashed me into the car in front. Fair enough just bad luck nothing to do with Renault. I have again recently replaced track rod ends at minor costs but now the sixth gear is whining badly and that’s with 89k on it now. Bear in mind, I have looked after the van from day one serviced properly personally and valeted once a week. Oh and more thing, the driver’s window won’t go down more than 4 inch. I love driving the van, it’s very comfy and pokey but I hate the reliability and Renault’s customer service. Seriously considering a VW - Brycey from Durham
At the company where I work (multidrop delivery), we have two Ford Transit (2008 & ’09) and two Renault Master (2007 & ’08). My Master van 2007: new starter motor, new clutch (hydraulics gone), new brakes, driver’s seat with a hole on the rhs. And new locks for sliding and back door. Only 49k miles on the clock. Ford Transit: both has new starter motors and 2009 has a new power steering pump + new ECU. 2008 has also new lock for a sliding door and the key. Both Transit, no more than 20k - Peter from London
Just thought I would follow this up now I found out why the engine seized. The CRANKSHAFT snapped where at one of the big end journals! Yes, that’s right, broken crankshaft, unbelievable! Do yourselves a favour and avoid these vans because the repair bills will kill you - David Lloyd from Staffordshire
I have a Trafic 53 just gone over 100,000 I’m on my 4th gear box, had new turbo, new head (after glow plug broke at Renault service centre) in total about £10,000 worth of repairs. Don’t touch this van, it will cost you money! - Dennis Johnson from Hertfordshire
Submitted: 2011-11-07 | ID: 8534 | 1/10
![]()
I bought the top of the range diesel GTline in February. What an unbelievable car for the money! Renault Sport suspension, 18 inch alloys, leather upholstery and sat nav are all great quality. It has great power for 110BHP and if you put it in 6th and drive it at 60mph a full tank will take you about 750-800 miles. I can’t say enough good things about this car. The only criticism I could have is that the Continental Contisport low profile tyres are a little short on rubber for some of Ireland’s roads! Get yourself one of these bad boys if you want the best of both worlds!
Submitted: 2011-10-24 | ID: 8478 | 5/10
![]()
I bought my Megane in 2009 for £6495 with 32000miles on the clock. Since then the clutch wire on the pedal has broken twice, it has also had problems with the windows only working when using the centre console button. As for leaks? Well I now carry with me a small towel as I am sick of being wet through; it leaks on both sides, but the drivers side seems worse. I am looking to replace it in 2012, but it will NOT be with another Renault!
Responses to this review
I can concur with Christine’s comments. I too have a 2005 cabrio 1.9 Diesel. Buy them cheap (I drilled Solihull Renault down to just over £6,300 for mine three years ago; with less than 15,000 miles on the clock! They wanted £8,995 initially! Use them then scrap them after 3-4 years. You pay your money and you take your chance! - Mark Silva from Warwickshire
Submitted: 2011-10-24 | ID: 8476 | 1/10
![]()
What a delightful car to drive. So easy to park and manouver. I had a Honda CRV 4x4 before, also a nice car but the Koleos exceeds the CRV in funcionality. Great mileage on the super highway about 35 mpg per imp. gallon at 114/120 kmh, the sixth gear really makes a difference. For city driving the economy is not so good. Two small critisims: The hooded screen on the dash is so hard to see. Mine has red letters and figures. In the strong Santiago sun it is almost impossible to see. Setting the clock and the bluetooth set up is mind boggling. Other than that the Koleos and I are going to be companions for a long time.
Submitted: 2011-10-21 | ID: 8464 | 5/10
![]()
I purchased my Scenic in December 2010 and it then took 9 months of it being in and out of the garage to try to fix a rattle on both front doors. After all this time and the money spent trying to fix it, both Renault and Benfield motors washed their hands of it saying it was acceptable car niose. I still have the rattle. I would not buy another Renault nor would I buy another car from Benfield Motors.
Responses to this review
Woah! Are you me in disguise? The problems you’ve had sound VERY similar to mine although I don’t have a rattle in the doors, mine is the dashboard and it is annoying the hell out of me but sadly, that is the least of my worries as you will soon find out! I bought my 2007 Scenic from Benfield Renault in Felling, Gateshead for £7,500 last August. It worked fine for the first 2-3 months or so (48+mpg round doors etc.) but then things rapidly changed. In the 14 months, I have owned this car, I have had a split fuel pipe which leaked onto the starter motor and two corroded £5 bushes (sp) and Benfield wanted £750 to fix it as it apparently wasn’t covered under their warranty. It has been back 4/5 times for same problem as now I’m lucky if I average 35mpg around the doors. In December, the automatic handbrake decided to stop working for about 20 seconds (can you guess where I’m going here? Yup, I was parked on a hill!) That cost £1,300 as it completely boll*cksed the passenger door and the manager at good old Benfield told me to claim through my insurance which I had to as I needed a car over Xmas. It has since gone into Benfield today (Monday) to have handbrake investigated with Renault UK assistance and the guy I have been speaking to about this rang me today saying the garage had quoted £750 to fix it! To say I’m angry is a bit of an understatement and I completely feel your pain! I hope you get it sorted. Don’t give up - C M from Northumberland
About the rattling noise, it might be those small tin plates on the outer side of the doors, just behind the door handles. At first, I thought that might be some lock strings inside the door, I heard them when I speeded down the motorway or when I listened to loud music in the car. You can touch them and try to know if it’s the same noise. Sorry for my English which is not my native language - Botz Daur from Moldova
Submitted: 2011-10-17 | ID: 8446 | 2/10
![]()
I have owned it for 9 months now and have done 17,000 miles. I’m very pleased so far. It averages 35.5 mpg (that includes towing 12’ flatbed and small trailer a lot). You won’t get more than 38-39 mph when driving tidy, but doesn’t go below 32-33 very often. It has just had its first service everything seems good, plenty of power when you need it; 80mph is comfortable. All in all I’m very happy with the van. Shame about the dealer/sales rep, as a result I had my service done elsewhere!
Submitted: 2011-10-17 | ID: 8431 | 5/10
![]()
I always wanted a scenic and loved it, until it started to go wrong!! Within the space of 2 years it needed a new clutch, gearbox, sun roof seals, gutters clearing as water was pouring into car, which happened twice by the way! Numerous electrical faults, and to top it all off, the EGR valve broke closely followed by the turbo blowing up the engine. Suffice to say it is now dead! I enjoyed it while it was being good but once it started going wrong it was a quick slippery slope to the scrap yard. I won’t be buying another Renault!! :((
Submitted: 2011-10-10 | ID: 8406 | 2/10
![]()
Hi there, Just a quick word in defence of the car. I leased a Megane 2.0 Privilege brand new in 2007. The car has mint leather interior and the colour is Quartz Gold, An absolute stunner on a sunny day! After leasing the car for two years I was so impressed I bought it. The car is now four years old and has 46, 000 miles on the clock. We travel through France every year to see relatives and I have yet to have a fault with anything on the car. I have to admit renewing headlamp bulbs is a bit of a fiddly task, but take it to Halfords and it will be done in no time and it will be well worth the fiver. Hope this adds a bit of a balance.
Submitted: 2011-10-10 | ID: 8400 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had this van from new. It’s always been main dealer maintained and repaired and has been an excellent van. There have been some faults, which have been mainly suspension, ball joints the power steering pump failed and then 4 months later the alternator. The main dealer had me back on the road within 24 hrs every time. Sadly the gearbox and clutch now need replacing at 102000 miles. I would buy another, but I would only ever have it main dealer maintained. It’s cheaper and better in the long run.
Submitted: 2011-10-04 | ID: 8391 | 4/10
![]()
I have a Trafic van and it has been backwards and forwards to Motorline Renault, Maidstone as it keeps failing to start and has had 7 starter motors in the last 9 weeks. Renault are now refusing to carry the works out under warranty despite the face they have not found the problem. They say that once a new one is fitted all is ok. They can not find the cause other than to say we might be holding the key in the on position. Beware as they are now saying I have to pay for the starter motor!!!! What happened to consumer rights? Oh, and Renault UK have closed the case; clearly they do not have a clue and were quick to say that I should get a second opinion from another garage, yet I bought the van new from them??!!
Responses to this review
Hi, I have a Renault Trafic at Motorline in Maidstone, I would just like to know how you find their service. I put mine there because my clutch went. At first, they wanted to change my flywheel as well claiming it had a high spot and would make my new clutch judder. When I insisted that my clutch never juddered before and that I could not afford to pay anymore than the £800, they wanted to supply and fit a new clutch and slave cylinder, they said okay. Eventually I went to pick up my van this evening (22 November 2011) and upon arrival at reception, they told me that the van was not taken for a test drive because the technician deemed it too dangerous to drive. I was shocked, I asked why it was that I was not told this when I phoned them earlier and the lady at servicing had told me that the van was ready and all "tickety-boo" as she put it, her reply was that she thought the technician had told me, over the phone whilst he was trying to sell me a flywheel for an extra £300 the previous Saturday. I asked what the problem was and they told me that it was the track rod ends, so I asked to test drive the van, they first refused claiming that people had driven off without paying their bills in the past, so it was no longer company policy, so I then said that I would not be adverse to having one of their employees come with me on the test drive, to which they reluctantly agree. Once I started driving, it became immediately obvious that there was a clunking noise when I turned the van either left or right, a noise that had never been there before. The service manager claimed it was there from before but I know for a fact that this is not true, I have never had a problem with it and it has always been main dealer serviced and maintained. They then said that as a gesture of goodwill and because I had to get onto two trains and as cab to collect the van, they would lend me a vehicle and fix it for me but I would have to pay for the track rod ends. I reluctantly agreed, but I have since been thinking it over and I don’t see why I should. First and foremost the problem was not there when I took the van to them last Thursday, then they failed to inform me even when I phoned them earlier today to ask if it was ready, I mean the lady’s words were that it was all ready and tickety-boo, then I use the van for business deliveries as I am self employed and the vehicle they gave me as a courtesy car is a very small Renault car, I think it’s a Clio or a Twingo. That is completely inadequate for my needs and I cannot do any deliveries with it, losing me even more money. They said that they would need the van at least another day maybe two as no one in the country has these track rod ends in stock apparently. I feel like I have had the p*ss taken out of me big time and to top it all they are even trying to make me pay for it. I believe it is not the track rod ends at all to me it sounds like the CV joints and it sounds like they have damaged them when they pulled out the gear box to replace the clutch, my problem is what can I do about it? I hope someone can help, I answered your post because the fact you went to Motorline Maidstone caught my eye. I would not be surprised if they have something to do with all those parts you keep having to replace. I would appreciate any information you can send my way thanks - A.Picarell from England
Sounds like they have goosed the ns inner cv drive shaft. When you remove it if you’re not careful or incompetent, the spider rollers fall out and drop in the diff/gear box, causing you to strip the box to remove said needle rollers. There are 32 needle rollers per roller bearing 3 rollers per joint. If there are a few missing, this will cause vibration when driving, similar to wheel balancing clonk when the drive is taken up on pulling away - Bill from Kent
Submitted: 2011-10-04 | ID: 8388 | 2/10
![]()
Just a word of warning for anyone wishing to acquire a new 150. As from September 2011 that engine is not availabe anymore as it does not meet Euro 5 criteria. I am having to settle for a new Euro 5 115 Sport which is more economical, but no more powerful. I guess I will have to get it remapped for that extra oomph that it needs. I have been otherwise very happy with my present 58 Sport so far which is why I am getting another.
Submitted: 2011-09-30 | ID: 8372 | 5/10
![]()
Owned my Renault for 4.5 years now. The quality of the materials used inside and out aren’t great, the fact that unless your fingers are very thin, long and bend in 4 ways, you will have to get a dealer to change your light bulbs. Other than these minor facts I have been more than happy with my Scenic. The seats are very comfy, the ride is very smooth, the gearbox is a breeze, the 1.9dci engine is powefull enough, the MPG is not the best but ok, but best of all is the space and cubby holes inside, the kids love the fact that we can always get the toy’s, bikes etc. inside on days out. We also own a Mini cooper and MG ZT, but this car has had less problems and always is the first car we jump in on any trip of 4 miles. I guess mine has been lucky so far.
Submitted: 2011-09-20 | ID: 8335 | 4/10
![]()
A most comfortable and spacious cab that is easy to drive, but that’s it. After 2.5 years (70k) the gears disappeared. Then the hydrolic unit was changed under warranty. After another 2 years and approx 70k the same again. The Renault dealer charged £270 for diagnostics and over £3000+VAT to change the hydrolic unit again! Daylight robbery! It’s obviously a manufacturer’s fault. Stay away from Trafics!
Responses to this review
Ray, I have exactly the same issue at present and have been left with no option other than to proceed forward with legal proceedings. I purchased three vans 2007 and regrettably two of these were automatics. One vehicle when reached 45,000 had the robotics kit fail and was replaced under warranty. Now the van has reached 92,000 2012 it has failed again and Renault UK say "it is one of those things". To add insult to injury, the second vehicle with 142,000 has a failed robotics kit also now which was replaced by Renault at a cost of near on £3,000 to me to be told a month later that now a slave cylinder has also failed and will require replacing at a cost of £1200. Renault’s comment were give you £500 per van trade in! I will keep everyone updated with how this comes out but if anyone would like to get in contact, I can be contacted on 01795 228083 - Damien Norton from England
Submitted: 2011-09-19 | ID: 8330 | 1/10
![]()
Never again Trafic, never again Renault or any other French make!!!! I bought my one second hand with 40k miles and have had nothing but problems. December last year the clutch went costing £1,500 to replace. In May of this year I had my timing belt, water pump, front pads and front shock absorbers done at a cost of £2,500 and now a gearbox fault is showing! I have been quoted £3,500 for two gearbox parts and labour and because it’s an automatic one of the parts costs £2,436! I contacted Renault customer service and after an investigation they offered me 20% discount, which I have declined. I am going to pay it off ASAP sell it then and go back to VW.
Responses to this review
Where on earth did you go for a new clutch? Main dealer price is only around £700 - David from England
I’ve just broke one because a telegraph pole hit the top so have good engine and gearbox + lots more available 0779 402 2369 - Chris Hargreaves from Derbyshire
The Renault Trafic/Opel Vivaro is not a french make. They are built in England! I have one myself. 2005 model, 94k at the moment. OK car - Eirik Hustvedt from Norway
Submitted: 2011-09-16 | ID: 8311 | 1/10
![]()
The best van I’ve ever owned. Mine is 3yrs old with 170,000 miles on the clock and has just had its first fault; aircon has died. Every thing else is perfect.
Submitted: 2011-09-11 | ID: 8298 | 5/10
![]()
I have had my imusic for a year now. I had terrible service where I bought it as the dealer was useless and didn’t give me any info etc., but that’s another story. The car is good, however and has everything I would want on it including an ac/cd player etc. But on having its first service I got charged £40 for having leaves cleared out of the front grill!?? Also my front brake pads were 60% worn. The website is very good, looks good, but you get a load of flim flam. I was told not to park under trees and perhaps I drove a lot of stop start jouneys? The brake pad thing is ongoing, but I can’t say I am happy as I should be with my first new car. Me thinks I will stick to Ford next time as I had very good service there.
Submitted: 2011-09-11 | ID: 8296 | 3/10
![]()
Mine is a six year old model recently purchased with 44k on the clock. I’m not the greatest Renault fan, but this car is an eye opener. This version has key less system, like Ford advertise on their Fiesta range, as long its on you you can open, lock the car and start without inserting the card. Truly a help when the bad weather arrives and my other half’s hand bag swallows the card. There is some neat under floor storage and on the parcel shelf, which is handy and it has sun blinds to keep the kids cool in the back and side windows. On the road the extra weight and length do help the handeling and ride; I had convertable prior and she was bit lively. If you find one of these and its around £3k grab one, or at least try her out as we are not disappointed.
Submitted: 2011-09-11 | ID: 8291 | 4/10
![]()
Hi Chaps! I got my Espace approx. 10 years back. It’s a 2.1 diesel turbo and is the best car I have ever bought. It’s not had too many problems; drive shaft, ball joints, brakes, discs, it’s had two clutches,one set of glow plugs and has been to LeMans 3 times. It starts first time and has done,247,000+ miles and still goes well. I think I’ll put another engine in this one when it expires. A great vehicle.
Submitted: 2011-09-11 | ID: 8287 | 5/10
![]()
I purchased this car in July 2008 and needed a new alternator after two weeks. I have also experienced lots of little electric faults; wipers, door locks etc. It has also needed a new turbo and egr valve, and now the dash has packed in. This has to be be the worst car I have ever had it’s only done 57,000 miles! My advice is AVOID, AVOID at all costs.
Responses to this review
Nah my Renault dci has been total good - Seb from England
Submitted: 2011-09-11 | ID: 8283 | 1/10
![]()
Well what can I say? IT’S EXCELLENT! I Bought this car second-hand on the 18th of Aug 11 and I love it. There are only two things that I’m getting the garage to put right, under warranty: The back driver’s side window came down when I locked the car and I’m currently waiting for Renault to get the part in; also the clutch pedle keeps getting stuck at the bottom, but so far that’s it. My break pads squeal, but that’s because they’re hard pads so I can’t complain, at least you know when I’m around, lol! It’s really good on fuel around town and on the motorway. In my old petrol car I was putting in £10 every 2 days, but this diesel car has had £70 worth of fuel in the last 14 days there’s still 1/2 tank left. It cruises in 5th and has the pulling power if needed. It’s really comfy and quiet. There are 3 seatbelts in the back so there’s room for 3 adults, if you have a child seat then theres room for 2 thin passingers in the back (if your big then you get a bit squashed). I had a Renault Megane Coupe before and had to trade it in for this as there’s so much more room and I’m loving the 4 doors and big boot. There are two drinks holders and the cubby holes in the front under your feet brilliant for storing the kids stuff and there’s also storage in the doors. There’s no key, its a card system, you just put the card in press the start button and off you go. So far it’s a brilliant car, 5 stars. It’s even shut my too kids up!!
Responses to this review
Just to say the car is a 2005 not 2008. Six months tax costs £52.25 of £90 for a full year. I still love driving it. I would totally recommend buying one, it will be the most economical car you will buy! Good luck, hope this helps! - Debbie Tillman from Kent
Submitted: 2011-09-07 | ID: 8273 | 5/10
![]()
I have had the car from new and have found it to be such a reliable car. It has only done 69000 miles. It is now our run around car as we bought a new car 5 years ago, but our daughter has been using it everyday for the past year. To get it through the MoT this year has only cost me £226. One of my friends bought one because he knew how pleased I was with mine and he has had his 3 years with no problems.
Submitted: 2011-09-06 | ID: 8259 | 5/10
![]()
I have only had this car for a month, but it’s proving to be a fab little car and good fun to drive. I also have a Laguna, but I prefer driving the Clio purely due to the handling of it. It is very cheap to run. I looked at a few small cars, however, I think the Clio II is a very good looking car as well as being quite big inside so it was a no brainer as far as I was concerned. Great little car.
Submitted: 2011-09-05 | ID: 8255 | 4/10
![]()
Bought as a second car in Nov 2010 almost on a whim, because I was taken with its appearance and popularity. The plus points are that it’s an enjoyable car to drive; it’s comfortable and quite spacious. It’s also very economical, easily returning 50+ mpg in the urban cycle. The bad points are its failure to prevent water ingress and, I’d guess, resultant electrical problems; the electric windows and the ECU being markedly vulnerable. I spent nearly £1,300 in repairs and maintenance on this car in ten months of ownership. I’ve traded it in and would counsel against anyone buying a Megane of this vintage. Pity, because it could have been a class leader, but for its failings. Hopefully, Renault have improved the reliability of subsequent models.
Submitted: 2011-09-01 | ID: 8244 | 2/10
![]()
It’s a pity you can’t put minus stars or link every google search to this to see reviews of Renault or Megane before people purchase one. I’ve had mine 5 years and I bet I’ve spent nearly £2500 on things I’ve never before spent on a car and most of these were electriclal faults. The latest issue has completely killed the car and I’ve just gone and purchased a Vauxhall. My UPC unit got fried after it rained one day 2 years ago. That fault plus the one that the frying caused to the engine management system cost me £1200 in one visit to Renault! They replaced the UPC unit but didn’t fix the cause of the leak I had told them about and 2 weeks later the new unit got fried! I made sure they paid for that replacement (very common fault). The unit has lasted just over 2 years and has gone again, though in stages; it wouldn’t start when you asked it to, I have had the RAC out about 6 times to get me to the garage, it actually started after pushing it to the tow bar on 2 occassions and cost me a fuel pump I didn’t need. After breaking down for the 10th time at home last week, I went to Vauxhall and purchased a new Corsa (which I had read umpteen reviews on as well as other cars. I also found Renault had the highest electrical fault rates of ALL manufacturers). All I will tell anyone is ALWAYS research any purchase. I do for everything these days. TVs, computers etc. Shame I didn’t do it for the Megane. It is now an obstacle on the side of the road about 10 minutes away from my house. I have used up all my allocated RAC callouts so I’ve got to get someone to tow me home, then call the local scrap dealer as I’m sick of the sight of it. So much so I thought I would do this review after googling breakers yards in Birmingham! Thanks Renault for a nice looking car with all the bits and extras I ever wanted on a car, except rubbish MPG and umpteen stupid faults that cost a fortune to fix!!
Submitted: 2011-08-30 | ID: 8215 | 1/10
![]()
I think this is a lovely car. I’ve always bought Renaults since I was 18 and all have been very reliable. I’m now 43 by the way. My wife has always wanted one of these, so we saved £5000 and bought a 55 plate 1.9 dci 120 gold. It has good looks and is and comfortable well equipped. We took it back after one week as the air con wasn’t working and one window would’nt come down, but the garage repaired these faults. Then three weeks later we found there was diesel leaking into the alternator, which caused it to fail; lucky it didn’t catch fire? This was repaired under warranty. Today the turbo failed, what a nightmare, this may not be covered by the warranty because the garage didn’t tick the box to cover this part!?! Turbos are a common fault on dci engines. I change the oil every 5 to 6 k for fully synthetic not every 18000 as Renault recommends. I just hope the garage I bought this car from has a heart or I will ask for a complete refund. My wife is devastated; £848 for turbo plus £55 hr fitting it!
Submitted: 2011-08-30 | ID: 8214 | 3/10
![]()
Bought my Renault Scenic 1.6 II 04 reg in 2007 second hand, replacing our Mk.1 Scenic (an excellent model). This Scenic, however, a pile of rubbish. First the electric locking went on the driver’s door, which was repaired by the garage under warranty. Then three electric coils at £30 each, followed by the handbrake failure (a year before the recall) costing £800. Next was the rear offside passenger window which dropped, this was just the plastic clip failing and a replacement cost just £4. However, shortly after this the regulator failed on the same window, causing the window to open after locking, and then refusing to budge, which cost £200. More recently the electric dash display packed up, thankfully (I believe due to Watch Dog) this was replaced for £100. Now my battery keeps needing to be charged up. Renault I believe are aware of the faults, we tried to get them to pay something towards our electric brake failure costs, but as we could not prove it was part of the recall fault we got nowhere. I fear what’s next? As I’m sure do many others upon reading through previous reports.
Submitted: 2011-08-26 | ID: 8209 | 1/10
![]()
I have a Renault Megane Cabrio 2005. It’s a 55 plate with 38000 miles on the clock and is the privilege model. I have only had it two weeks ago so I haven’t been to clean it yet but can’t wait two see if it has any leaks; I’m pretty postive it hasn’t as it’s immaculate. Love it to bits! I previously had a Renault Megane Convertible 2001 model so I’ve just moved up a model. Miss my old car but love my new baby. The boot has loads of room when the roof is up and it’s still ok with the roof down as I still managed to fit a quite big suitcase in, but I do miss the way the roof went into a diffrent bit on the old car and not into the boot. Thanks for looking at my car review.
Submitted: 2011-08-18 | ID: 8181 | 5/10
![]()
Purchased new in January 2008. Three and a half years later, I’ve put up 76k miles without any problems. Renault have definitely sorted out their reliability issues with this one. Great car to drive and travel in.
Submitted: 2011-08-15 | ID: 8167 | 3/10
![]()
I’ll save you a fortune, don’t buy a Scenic however cheap cause it will cost you a fortune to keep repairing. Renault’s customer service are not interested and the dealers are not much help either. Buy a Nissan X-Trail, worth the extra money and very reliable. If I listed all the problems I’ve had, my iPhone would need charging at least five times.
Submitted: 2011-08-15 | ID: 8164 | 3/10
![]()
What can I say? I’ve had my Renault Trafic for a year now. Ok every one has their different opinions, but I’ve had the Ford Tourneo, three of them. Yes they are very good, but I had a serious leak in the 2005 model (the ’96 and ’97 model no problems). I’m going back to my Renault Trafic with which I’ve never had any problems. So if you’re going to buy one, buy the Renault Trafic dci sport. Go Renault!!
Submitted: 2011-08-14 | ID: 8149 | 5/10
![]()
I have the bright yellow banana mobile, 97,000 on the clock, still in good nick, reliable and nippy.
Submitted: 2011-08-10 | ID: 8115 | 4/10
![]()
Having previously driven a Nissan Primastar 07 reg, which was a total nightmare. It was in for repair more often than on the road; brakes, discs, turbo, fuel pump, track rod ends, ball joints, steering rack, etc. It was such a total nightmare that when we got a new Renault Trafic I nearly resigned my job! I hated these Renault built vans with a vengence. However, after 15 months use of this van and 80k on the clock with no repairs needed, no breakdowns and only brake pads and service costs; still running on the same brake discs and not even a wiper blade needed, this has to be the most reliable van I have driven in 30 years. I am not joking, you should read my last report on a Renault built Nissan!! My new Renault is, however, perfect, I even had to apologise to my Transport Manger because this van is so good. I will keep you all posted with an update.
Submitted: 2011-08-09 | ID: 8106 | 5/10
![]()
Mine is the banana coloured 1.6 Coupe. Nippy, looks good, very pleased even with 90,000 on the clock.
Submitted: 2011-07-25 | ID: 8040 | 3/10
![]()
My Scenic has now completed 130k miles from new. Apart from the dash board failing (£100 Renault repair) and regular servicing (now by a local garage) the car has never let me down once. I’m still on the original battery, clutch and exhaust. I had the cam belt changed with a full service and MoT and still got change from £500.
Submitted: 2011-07-22 | ID: 8034 | 4/10
![]()
I purchased mine new in March 2009. Mine is the latest facelifted model (just before the new model), which has some silver addition in the front part of the car. I don’t have roof leakage problems, performance is great and actually feels better then the BMW Series 5, but I regret to say that these are not long lasting cars. After nearly 3 yrs and 6000KM on the clock I have all sorts of problems: Wipers going on automatically without rain; cracked outdoor handles; trim colour faded; strange clicking sounds when operating steering and a strange sound off left wheel when driving less than 10KM. Well all I can say is that you’ll enjoy the car when it’s factory fresh, but I guess 3 yrs is the liftime expectancy of this model. I wouldn’t go for another Renault again the new CC is wore than the older one, doh! Renault wake up! Peugeot is ruling.
Submitted: 2011-07-18 | ID: 8020 | 4/10
![]()
A good van. Just clocked 108k on a camping holiday around the south cost of Sweden. Filled up on fuel in Puttgarten, Germany, before getting the ferry and then on way home (same filling station); 560+ miles on a tank and still 1 bar left on the guage. Oh and it’s the DC100 LH29 (hightop LWB). It is chipped and pushing 130ps with sports induction - makes a difference to top end power. The build quality is not the best, however, every job I have done on it was not awkward. I have fitted new front wishbones; the previous owner being tight and just replacing the lower ball joint on one side, which upset the chassis and track. Don’t adjust the tracking to compensate for the bodge up, if you have to tweek the tracking then something else is wrong and you need to find route cause. I also replaced the ARB drop links and track rod ends while I was at it. There is a knock from front when the van sways side to side over bumps so need to replace front sub-frame mounts, cast drop link, (2 bolts and they are off). PAS good. The gearbox grumbles so might need to recon it, but all parts are available online for the DIYers. A new clutch and slave cylinder; these are not the best built things, but if you do not replace the plastic feed pipe at the same time expect to be visiting the garage shortly. Have also fitted a new steering wheel, which was not expensive nor the new gater and knob for the gear stick. I have also replace the fuel hand priming pump as the one-way valve was shot thanks to rubbish UK fuel. To replace the hand pump buy just the front section, expensive 99euros, and swap the pumps over, you’ll need a hot air gun and screwdriver, a plumbers freeze spray is optional. This little pump when it fails causes the fuel filter housing to drain back to the tank and you’ll only notice a problem when starting as it keeps turning over before it catches. Check if the hand pump is hard, if you need to keep squeezing it every morning then it’s shot. Factory windows for this van are cheap; rear doors £65 each, basic sliding door window £125, sliding opening window £165, don’t forget the rubber strips at £20 each. 2005 Mondeo seats fit nicely, Vauxaull Sintra seat swivels £30, passenger one might be a bit high for some people. The front seat belts are not long enough for the larger sized person. Gears clunk into gear when cold so get the G/box oil replaced and filled with the proper Renault stuff then it’s sweet. Change this oil about every 20k and then you can also check the bearings, if they are going metal shards will be found on the housing sump plug. The rear brake callipers can seize due to the rubber gater perishing over time and allowing water to get in; a recon kit is available on the net or buy an exchange unit for £80. Ensure the retaining clip on the handbrake cable shroud is properly fitted otherwise you will need new pads, disks and bearings. The cam belt is easy; you need to remove the engine mounts, wheel and plastic covers, the crank pulley is on tight so you need to fabricate a tool to stop it from moving while you’re undoing the big bolt! Flush out the intercooler every time you do the air filter, plus take of the EGR valve and clean it, you will be amazed at the debris in there. The older cars had a collection tank, but the new ones take the crank case breather pipe and plug it back into the inlet manifold so it can burn its own rubbish, nice! Oh the curry hook can be removed and replace with another 12volt socket as the power feed is there behind it. My 54 reg van is still on the original battery. If the fuel filler plastic surround leaks, you need to remove and replace the sealing strip with a bead of silicone or draft excluder strip to stop water getting in to the sills from here and freezing in winter. Water can also get in to the other sill so drain them periodically and fill with waxoil to prevent rusting. The fuel tank supply line as it exits can kink at the sender unit! Go under and warm it up and tweek it back straight, don’t be too force full as the replacement pipe comes in two halves now, so at 99-120euros per piece be careful. The air filter can rub onto the injector wires so pull the box off, and fit a few washers under the mounting points, about 10mm/15mm will do it. The mass airflow meter rubs on the aluminium cast air inlet and can rub through it leaving a leaking manifold, also the plastic pipe from the airbox to the inlet can get worn through and allows air to escape causing a pressure drop, which upsets the ecu and the boost pressure sensor/ wastegate control valve, the little black thing mounted on the side of the ecu casing in the engine bay with small black pipes going to it. So, to summarise, there are basic problems with the Renault Trafic, but care and attention plus some mechanical appreciation of the engine etc, will ensure it lasts long enough. Don’t forget all the swb and lwb low roofs are built by British workers! High tops are built in France so these might be better put together then the others. Oh and the VW gearbox is just as bad as the Trafic’s box, but they eat drive shafts. yum!
Responses to this review
Regarding fuel priming and the non-return-valve (NVR), I found it easier and considerably cheaper to fit a small new NRV in fuel line next to hand prime pump. Cost £4 ebay and a couple of pipe clips. Also I read that the NRV is in the top of the fuel tank in ’05 Trafic making it a b*st@rd to change - Yeoblade Ashby from Somerset
Submitted: 2011-07-18 | ID: 8019 | 5/10
![]()
The car has been fantastic apart from an annoying noise from the rear end, drivers side. I had everything checked over and had the shockers replaced. Now awaiting a new fuel tank as the garage say this is apparently where the problem lies. No problem with the fuel gauge though. The car has only done 33k from new.
Submitted: 2011-07-16 | ID: 8013 | 4/10
![]()
I have had nothing but problems with my Trafic. I think we should all get watchdog on our side and make a stand, it has to stop.
Submitted: 2011-07-16 | ID: 7999 | 1/10
![]()
Is it just me then? I bought mine secondhand with a full service history. Other than regular sevices, and tyres and brakes, the only problems I have ever had are: The gear linkage cable coming off (fixed in 5 mins with a cable tie, which lasts about 3 months. Or get new selector cables. I’d stick to cable tie option) and the driveshaft cv joint. My vehicle has now covered 212,000 miles and it’s the best vehicle I’ve ever worked. I did swear I would never buy another Renault after being stitched up with an Espace once, but I’m so glad I changed my mind.
Responses to this review
No, it’s me too. I love mine, it is perfect for my purposes and has never given me a moment’s trouble in three years. I will be ordering another next year without a doubt - Steve from England
I’ve had a 2007 Trafic 8seater LWB minibus for 2 years. Had 70K on clock. Best van driving position, best comfort. Now got 120K on the clock and up until last week, I had no problems at all. Then last week, it just cut out. Found out today that the fuel pump needs replacing. £440+VAT new or £340 reconned. Gonna surf the net to see if I can find one cheaper - Brian from Nottinghamshire
Made me laugh about the gear link cable tywrap lasts me a week then when it breaks when ure in traffic have to get out pop hood and tywrap. Also electric windows f*cked so disconnect the motor and now raise and lower windows with my hand something out the flint stones. This can piece of cr*p - David from Lanarkshire
My 2007 has done 156k and the slave cylinder has only just gone. We changed the clutch because the box was out anyway but it still had loads of miles left on it. In all, a very good minibus 156k and still going well (for now at least) I am looking at buying another Renault. The 100k warranty is appealing too - Gary Court from Wales
Submitted: 2011-07-16 | ID: 7988 | 5/10
![]()
Worst car I have owned due to abysmal reliability.
Submitted: 2011-07-07 | ID: 7943 | 1/10
![]()
I’ve been driving a company 2007 Renault Trafic dCi 115 SWB Quickshift 6 from new. I’ve now done 64k over 2 years across UK and Ireland consisting of long motorway journeys as well as lots of local start/stop urban trips as a private user. Good Points: The van is comfy and not bad at fuel if driven professionally. Good brakes/stopping distance when in emergency (ABS, EBD and Brake Assist as standard). Good gear ratios. Bad Points: Above 60mph it is significantly louder inside the cabin and it causes tiredness far quicker over many hours journeys. 115 BHP with a heavy load in the bay is not something that cheers up, causing persistent shifting, 6-5-6, uphills. The front windsreen is horrible as it is not sunlight reflective and with no A/C it’s not much fun to drive in the summer time (open windows makes too much noise). Revolutions are limited to 4k - be aware when downshifting for overtaking or you might end with no torque on wheels. First and reverse gear synchros are starting to be a bit dodgy now (64k miles) despite clutch saving driving and the revolutions matching when downshifting. The indicator stalk tends to flip to counter position during fast steering manevours (itself for sure). Minor oil leaks. One of three bolts holding Power Steering Pump snapped in half. Fuel lines require bleeding if the van run outs of fuel completely - be sure to have proper allan key, syringe, off container fuel and 20 minutes time to be able to get back on track or AA/RAC might tow you away. Generally if looked after and well driven it won’t let You down; not a one breakdown only a few punctures.
Submitted: 2011-06-29 | ID: 7913 | 4/10
![]()
Bought our car in 2006 from new. The reason we went for Renault is for its safety reputation as we had three small children at the time. Basic advice "steer clear"! The most unreliable car you could imagine. No joke. I don’t know what mileage we have clocked up because we are on our second dash clock, but it’s about 110,000 miles. We are on our third turbo, the back windows won’t work, it’s just bill after bill. Do they still make Ladas? it would be a step up.
Submitted: 2011-06-29 | ID: 7912 | 1/10
![]()
Don’t buy a Renault Scenic, too many things go wrong and are expensive to repair; handbrake - £500, turbo - £400, egr valve - £200 and numerous engine mounts to name but a few. I have finally had enough and traded it in for a Kia Carens. Less things go wrong and there are no bad reviews.
Submitted: 2011-06-29 | ID: 7907 | 1/10
![]()
I have had my 1.5 DCi for 5 years it’s the most reliable car I have ever driven. This owes me nothing, I have only replaced the rear wiper and it has never failed an MoT.
Submitted: 2011-06-21 | ID: 7888 | 5/10
![]()
I have the turbo version of the smallest engine available, and it’s brilliant for nipping round town in, especially if hauling large loads around, but also for long motorway journeys. The road noise on motorways not the quietest but I’ve known much noisier cars and besides, the speakers for the radio are excellent! Steering wheel feedback is good, not much turbo-lag, good combined mileage, and an extremely forgiving clutch making for quick, smooth gear changes when required. Brakes also nice and keen. Good amount of space in front and rear of cabin with comfortable seats and excellent boot space for such a small car. Well recommended!
Submitted: 2011-06-20 | ID: 7879 | 5/10
![]()
I bought a 1.6 16v Laguna and to start with I liked it.....that lasted about a month, then quite regulary it would not start first time, while driving a couple of times it cut out (good job I wasn’t on the motorway). Before I could get the problem fixed it is not starting at all. Replaced key card at a cost of £185 and replaced start button, both items came up on the diagnostics as faults, car still not starting. Been told now that it could be one of the computers (ECU Bcmodule etc), second hand ones start at around £300 and then they have to be decoded at a cost of £150 then there’s the labour and this isn’t by the main dealer so I can’t imagine how much they charge. Other small electric faults as well like the plastic melting onto the connecters in the rear light clusters, this stopped the indicator lights working and the break lights. Needless to say F am looking for a new car and it wont be French!!
Responses to this review
I had a similar problem and it was a faulty flywheel sensor. It cost me around 50euro to be bought and fitted by a mechanic - Phil from Ireland
Submitted: 2011-06-13 | ID: 7865 | 1/10
![]()
I am concerned about the road holding on corners and would have looked elsewhere considering this problem.
Responses to this review
Not sure what you mean, mine goes round corners perfectly well and I’ve not heard anyone else complain - Steve from England
I would be more concerned how much you will need to pay for the repairs that you will have to do to it. Slave cylinders, clutches, injectors, gearboxs, fuel pump; the list goes on. Good luck, you will need it - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
I think we’ve got the picture Ashley, luckily it is not the experience of many others on this forum. It has been said that it is more to do with the way these vans are driven - Steve from England
I firmly believe that Watchdog should now get involved with this. A design fault on the Renault Trafic allows water to seriously corrode the injectors making their removal impossable even by their own dealerships. I’ve just had my vehicle pretty much written off by a Renault dealership causing damage snapping off an injector. The vehicle is three years old and just out of warranty but this fault will be eating these injectors as soon as the vehicle leaves the factory, something I wasn’t told when I purchased the van! I would strongly recommend that if you’re looking for a reliable van with quality customer care, you most certainly don’t look at Renault. You will be sorry, you have been warned! - Bryan Tomes from Buckinghamshire
Submitted: 2011-06-13 | ID: 7856 | 3/10
![]()
I have to say that this is the worst car I have ever owned in terms of faults. I have had it under 2 years and so far it has cost me £2000 worth of repairs. I too have experienced the electric windows just dropping down in both the back passenger sides, the heater has stopped working on the higher settings. Last year the window workers would not switch off this cost me over £300 to get a new UPC fitted at the Renault garage, now just 12 months after the original fault, my window wipers will not switch on and have been quoted nearly £400 by the Renault garage. Many of the problems I have had are not really with the central running of the car they are just stupid faults that stop you using your car and that Renault charge absolutely extrortionate prices to repair - Moral of the story is never buy a Renault!!
Responses to this review
My car keeps dying, I have had three batteries and three altenators in 7 months even though I told Renault that an auto electrician said it wasn’t the altenator but that it was a drain from Body Control Module not turning off. Renault said they did a diagnostics check and the problem was the altenator even though they had only replaced the altenator five months prior during that time I had two new batteries fitted and it kept dying so I took it back to Renault and they again diagnosed the altenator again and I had it replaced and two weeks later, my battery is dead yet again? Has anyone else had this problem? - Sue from Lancashire
I also have a dead battery problem. I don’t think it is the alternator problem. It started last week and I am still working on it to try to resolve the problem - Conshine Cof from Ireland
I had a 2007 Renualt Scenic that kept draining the battery, the problem was sorted by my Renualt dealer uninstalling the on-board computer and then reinstalling same - Pat Holland from Ireland
Common fault glove box light not turning off. Glove box cover no connecting with switch - Aksir Ali from England
Submitted: 2011-06-06 | ID: 7835 | 1/10
![]()
Read the reviews here. Up to a year, the car is nippy economical, spacious. After that a storm of failures. The main cost in all maintenance is the numerous computers that need to be reset, repaced. The list. Change the expensive brakepads every year, as the solid gold brake disks are part of the wheelhub: £350 a pop. Get an extended warranty, the aircon went 1 month after it finished, £800 (opened my windows instead) And the final biggie (there are numerous smaller yet strangely expensive fixes) is the locked rear handbrake. Seized calliper £166, handbrake computer £750 plus labour. Yes, broken handbrake computer. Keep that in mind when you look at this car in the showroom and walk on by. REPEAT Never Buy French Again REPEAT
Submitted: 2011-06-05 | ID: 7830 | 1/10
![]()
I’ve had my scenic now for 2 years, when I first got it, the coil went within weeks and took it back to the dealer, got it fixed and I had no problems until recently. The first thing that happened, my breaks failed, I went into the back of my sisters car, thankfully I wasn’t doing any speed and no damage was done. On my way home my steering went, I could hardly keep control of the car, with 4 children including a baby it terrified me. The next day, the car was totally dead, I couldn’t even lock the thing. The window wipers started going off when no one was anywhere near it and was making a banging noise as if it was trying to lock on it’s own, this drained my battery. I am now waiting on getting it fixed, but the mechanic has told me the steering control unit has gone as well as cpu unit and he thinks there are more problems there he hasn’t discovered yet. As soon as I get these matters sorted, I’m selling the blasted thing and never going near Renault again.
Submitted: 2011-05-29 | ID: 7808 | 1/10
![]()
This is the third scenic we have had. We have had no trouble at all! I won’t hesitate to have another one.
Submitted: 2011-05-29 | ID: 7805 | 5/10
![]()
Two weeks old and it hasn’t fallen to bits yet! Great looking car with plenty of admirers. Quick and excellent levels of grip. Build quality is surprisingly good and general finish is better than expected. Fuel economy not great but the biggest downfall is the noise, or lack of it!, oh and the poor sound system. Not much else out there to compete on performance/price.
Submitted: 2011-05-29 | ID: 7800 | 4/10
![]()
This Renault Kangoo is the single biggest load of c**p that I ever had the misfortune to set my hands on, I was in the Motor Trade for 30 odd years and in all the vehicles that I worked on and owned I have never before come across such cheap and utter rubbish. Everything breaks, new window switches, new engine mountings, "all of them" new clutch and pressure plate, new front suspension, cam belt, fan belt 3 times "like a elastic band", imobaliser failed, battery draining down to earth over night. I hate this car, I absolutely hate it. I am a seriously disabled person now, and I will never buy another Renault so long as I live, and I fully intend to inform every single person that has a pair of ears what a load of complete and utter c**p they are, how on Earth are they allowed to get away with it??
Responses to this review
I too have been in the motor trade for years and although I was dubious about buying a Renault Kangoo 1.5 dci 2003. Never the less I did three years ago an ex-council van and touch wood, I have had very few problems with it. Infact in three years, the only problem with it was a broken wire to the ecu which caused a starting problem but simple to repair. It now has 117,000 miles on the clock and is still going strong - so either I got a good one or you got a bad one - Colin Herdman from Stirlingshire
I’ve got starting problems and can’t find the break in the wire. The van bumps and starts ok but about every 50 or so times it just won’t start. Could you give me any pointers on where to look for the broken connection? The diagnostics show the problem area to be the relays in the ECU area but I have changed them for new and still got the problem. Any help on solving this problem would be much appreciated - Tom Bryan from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Hate the Kangoo with a passion, nothing but trouble will never buy a Renault again. Never, never, never, not a mechanic but I am an engineer and know when something is built like a straw house. Shame on you Renault, I will make it my life’s work to let everyone know not to buy Renault. Tut! - Sean price from Yorkshire
Submitted: 2011-05-19 | ID: 7751 | 1/10
![]()
I’m happy to say that we own a Megane dci and since owning it we’ve saven loads on fuel. Just running around locally we get close to sixty to the gallon and on a run we get normally seventy point two, but this has been known to be seventy five to the gallon. For the price it’s a pretty good car all round and we intend to buy another one later this year. As for the person who’s been having problems with the gears, all I can say is that ours is fine and my local dealer has never heard of the gear problem either. Perhaps an auto would suit them better? We also own a new Insignia, which I consider to be far better than a Mondeo in every respect, and a Shogun, which takes me to places that other 4x4’s struggle getting to.
Responses to this review
Of course all is well, the car is only two years old yet. Wait until the warranty is up and I bet you will be like the rest of us Megane owners - Claire D from Essex
Submitted: 2011-05-17 | ID: 7734 | 5/10
![]()
Absolute utter garbage, never ever buy a Renault! If there is ever one piece of advice to take on board this is it.. trust me! Please, please please, do not waste your hard earned money on one of these over hyped skips. They may as well sell them either new or second hand with a tag saying ’beware this piece of metal your about to buy will require bank rolling’!!! Utter dog muck. If Carlsberg made vans, it wouldn’t be a Renault. Buy a Ford Transit! A proper van made to do proper hard work and won’t let you down.
Responses to this review
You must have been unlucky, I’ve had one since 2003 and covered 160,000 miles with no problems at all. As for the Transit, I also bought one of those pieces of sh*t in 2007 and had cr*p from day one till I sold the Daganham dustbin. The transit cost me 20k, one of them stupid sport ones. I had new injectors, new engine, new clutch; the list goes on and its cr*p on fuel - Pat Brennan from England
Can anyone tell me if a the short wheel base version of the traffic can take two pallets comfortably? - Michael Lockwood from Hertfordshire
Hi, I would have to agree with Mark. I have had nothing but problems with my 58 plate, it has gone through slave cylinders like Jordan goes through husbands. It has had four slave cylinders within 120,000 miles and started engine cutting out whilst driving. The brakes and power steering went at the same time once at 50 mph towards a bend. Luckily, it turned on again. My experience is the same, stay away! Maybe I was unlucky but it is getting more common. Power to the blogs - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Just to continue on the Trafic van, I have just purchased the new 115 ll29 and it is far better on fuel than my old 100 dci was. I am now getting 720 mile per tank and I always have a full load if you compare this to a Transh*t, that gets between 450 to 500 per tank. That is a big saving on fuel. With the mileage I do, it works out over 3 years a total of £12,700 pounds that almost buys me another Trafic Sport. You would be mad to get anything else in the current climate, it also drives so much nicer than the old 100 dci and the Tranny - Patrick Brennan from England
Well my 2003 Trafic covered 320,000 miles until this year when I bumped it. Yeah I had the gearbox changed, the power steering pump and suspension wore out several times, new clutch, and I nearly got sick of it with the gearbox but I liked it so much that much I bought another one. Can anyone suggest a van you can park on a high street that is quick goes around corners like it’s on tracks then sits at 80mph on a motorway like its doing 40? The blogs all say service it correctly and that’s my experience. Use the right oil, change the filters etc then the turbo, fuel pump, injectors oh and the engine will be good for miles of trouble free driving. I sold my last one to a friend he repaired the front very easily, changed one sensor and it’s still going strong. One word of advice (maybe two) if you take the gearbox out for any reason, have it checked then change clutch cylinder, it’s very cheap to buy but very expensive to fit. The suspension does need to be kept on top of but again, don’t skimp. I once bought a £25 bottom arm. Big mistake! Buy cheap, buy twice - Steve Thomas from England
Submitted: 2011-05-13 | ID: 7714 | 2/10
![]()
Had this car 3 months. Bought it with 48,000 on the clock. Thought it was a great car for me as I have a baby and a 4 year old. Unfortunately my thoughts were wrong!!! Just had to pay out over £1000 for new pistons only to be told that the clutch was on it’s way out along with the tubo and injecter 4. In a catch 22 at the minute, do I risk it or lose even more money by trading it in? Such a shame as the style is ideal it’s just what’s under the bonnet that’s a load of ****!!!
Responses to this review
Don’t trust what your garage has told you. Low millage does not signify piston damage. Take the car to another garage and stop getting ripped off. I’ve worked on cars all my life and what you have said is a classic rip off by a garage, period - Paul Simin from Swansea
Submitted: 2011-05-13 | ID: 7705 | 1/10
![]()
A superb compromise car combining reasonable performance (among the best in its class), good economy (62mpg on long trips, 50mpg around town), very comfortable, very quiet, loads of carrying space, excellent access. Have now done over 80,000 miles and it has never let me down. So far, only items regarded as "consumables" have needed replacing. I would have given it 5 stars if it wasn’t for the following one irritating fault. It eats headlamp bulbs, and there is absolutely no point in carrying replacement bulbs because it has to go up on a ramp to have them replaced! It is a great pity that an almost perfect mid-range vehicle has been spoiled by this design fault.
Submitted: 2011-05-03 | ID: 7658 | 4/10
![]()
I Bought my very clean Kangoo van privately in april 2011 with 83000 miles on the clock. Very clean inside and out 6 year old van low mileage what could possibly go wrong? Well it lasted 9 days. Big end blew and only then did I start doing the research I should have done before. Have a look how many of these vans there are for sale with blown engines, research the reliability of the 1.5 DCI engine, I’m afraid it does not make pretty reading. Maybe I just got unlucky but scared by the experience I’ve gone to a dealer and got myself a Toyota Hiace having read the excellent reviews on this site. The dealer told me that the Kangoo is the worst small van on the market and he flatly refuses to retail them. Buyer beware.
Responses to this review
Thanks for the information on Renault Kangoo, I was about to book a Renault 1.4 7-seater until I read your complaint, I will never consider a Renault, maybe I will go for Toyota mpv. Thanks for feedback - Lawrence Law from Malaysia
Submitted: 2011-05-03 | ID: 7654 | 1/10
![]()
I have had my Renault Trafic SL27 dCi115 57 just over 4 years. Have never had a problem, has only had new brake pads, done 41,000 miles from new. It’s a brillant van and quick, fuel not as bad as I thought!! Alway full loads at the back.
Responses to this review
I agree it’s a dream to drive. Good on fuel return - Kev from Nottinghamshire
Submitted: 2011-05-03 | ID: 7652 | 4/10
![]()
A comfortable vehicle. Just a pity it doesnt work!! 2 rear electric windows, digital dash and engine dephaser system and handbrake system reprogrammed!!! All within 4 months. when you go to the Renault dealer you may as well look for the crew of the Marie-celeste, ’cos they dont care. All they want to do is charge 225 quid for a window winder. 500 for the dash (found out on a forum you can get it for 100 fitted, They wont tell you!) 500 for dephaser kit. For goodness sake !!! I would be better off in a Lada!! Now the handbake is faulty and it’s 400 for a new sysem, which has to be bought as a complete unit. A hand brake fitted including vat is a whopping 650 pounds!! Is it made from gold?! Renault know there is a problem with their c**p electrical components, so why dont they fix them? Or better still, make them correctly in the first place!!!! At least Toyota took steps to repair their faults. Take note Renault, I will not buy another..I have owned Renaults for 15 years.
Responses to this review
Just to update you all, the handbrake unit went kaputt. The Renault garage want £805.20p a new one. Does anyone out there have a second hand/reconditioned unit for sale? I wouldn’t mind if the Scenic had high mileage but it has only 40,000 miles and is well maintained. also the heater switch is playing around. If you are looking for a seven seater, go to the Corolla Verso or VW Touran, stay away from Scenics. Renaults are too fragile with no dealer or manufacturer support especially when they know there is all these faults and do nothing about it. Hey Renault, what about some goodwill from you for a change? Stop ripping us off! - William Allen from County Tyrone
I only wish I had read this before I bought a Grand Scenic, this has to be the worst made car ever. Mine has cost me thousands in repairs all I can say to anyone going to buy one is don’t save your money and get a good car - Brid Lynch from County Londonderry
Submitted: 2011-04-30 | ID: 7637 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my 1.8 RN (8 valve head) for £600 in 2006 with about 80k on the clock because it was the only decent sized family car that I could afford locally at the time when my Rover 214si suddenly died massively. It has always been pretty reliable, only failing to start once due to what turned out to be a loose block connector to the fuel pump under the carpet in the boot, recrimping sorted that out. All I have ever had to replace apart from tyres, exhaust and brakes is one coil pack (there are 2 on my model). The car has been used daily in all of the years that I have owned it and it has now covered over 127k miles although the blower motor has packed up due to what I beleive is a loose wire on the back of the switch, I’ll fix it before next winter. Would I buy another Laguna? HELL YES!!! but only if it was an older basic model because most of the bad reveiws concerning Renaults all seem to come from owners of later cars with "computer controlled this and that" that always seems to pack up. Six years motoring for 600 quid, you’d be silly not to.
Submitted: 2011-04-30 | ID: 7625 | 5/10
![]()
Bought this car last week, a second hand car, with 56k on the clock. Bought from Liverpool and drove all the way down to Malta with it. Heavy rain at Reggio Calabria, and very very bad roads down there. No leaks at all! So far so good! Had a problem with the service light, along with the airbag light, but found out problem was from under the drivers seat, just a loose connector. Very economic for a 16cc engine, even if it has 5 years!
Submitted: 2011-04-25 | ID: 7613 | 4/10
![]()
Swore I’d never buy a Renault, but got mine on ebay. I’ve had lots of big and small cars over the years, mostly all very good but this has surpassed them all. Now done 35,000 miles (I do a lot per year) and never missed a beat. The only job, which I did myself was a rear wheel bearing. Over 60mpg, now £20 year tax and cheap fully comp insurance. I am not complaining. Great comfort for a small car and bags of power for a diesel (good torque and 90 plus top speed). Perfect starting even on the coldest of winter mornings and loads of electrical niceties ... all of which... just work spot on. I really can’t believe I fell almost by accident on this amazing small car.
Submitted: 2011-04-12 | ID: 7545 | 5/10
![]()
This van looks pretty. I have had it put on a dia machine and it says number 3 injector, but number 3 injector is working. It cost me an arm and a leg, put 5 sets of new ones in and van no different. Wish I’d have kept my old tatty van.
Submitted: 2011-04-10 | ID: 7528 | 1/10
![]()
Bought from new last year, I am having problems with gears. They don’t seem to want to go into 1st, 2nd or reverse. You have to ram them in. I brought it to two Renault garages to check and their response was that all the Megane’s are the same and if I’m having problem getting into gear, take it out of gear let the car roll a bit and then try again. What a disgrace. I scrapped my 10 year old car for this and I’m sorry I did as my old car had less trouble.
Responses to this review
I have a Megane 1.5dci 2010 and I wouldn’t swap it for the world. We get close to 60mpg driving localy and well over 70mpg on a run. We’ve had no problems with the gears or anything else and plan on buying a new one later this year. We also run a vauxhall Insignia, which in my opinion is far better than the Mondeo in every respect - Ian Downes from Banffshire
The Megane gear selector is known to migrate, set your gear in reverse on gearbox and selector (undo 10 mil bolt retaining gear linkage to gear selector on gearbox) and manually place gearbox into reverse then tighten bolt up if not replace linkage form gearstick to box - Andrew Heaps from England
Submitted: 2011-04-07 | ID: 7512 | 2/10
![]()
29000 miles new engine, replaced rear discs & pads, ball joint, three. Now done 39500 miles needing track rod ends done, sliding door handle, top pin has come out twice. Never again.
Submitted: 2011-03-13 | ID: 7350 | 2/10
![]()
Well, I’ve had my car four weeks now and the roof has failed four times. Been back twice, going back again on Monday so we will see, but does not look good for the long-term!
Responses to this review
Hi, I have a Megane 2005, I may have the same problem with my roof, what button did you press to make your roof come down because I may be doing it wrong - Glen Duff from Devon
Hi, mine is a ’53 and has been in the garage four times for roof failure and they can’t fix it. Well they can if I pay £1,500+ on top of the £500 already spent. They now want to replace roof computer and the wiring room (this only comes from France cause it’s not a common part). Do they know what they’re doing? I don’t think so. Definitely wouldn’t buy another Renault or convertible. I only want to sell the damn thing, not rebuild it - Karen Willson from England
Submitted: 2011-03-13 | ID: 7340 | 3/10
![]()
Nothing but trouble with my battery for the last three months. I’ve put a new battery on twice, but still being drained by something. Checked all the usual things that can drain a battry but I’ve left nothing on.
Submitted: 2011-03-09 | ID: 7319 | 1/10
![]()
I have had the car for four years now and have to say it has been great. It has suffered a few of the faults that you will have already read about, such as the window mechanism breaking but overall, the car has been great and we are thinking of getting a new one soon. A little tip when dealing with Renault is phone Renault UK customer services when dealing with out of warranty claims. It only cost me £50 per window to have the mechanisms changed at the dealers and the car also does 50mpg and is super practical. I play golf every week and the car holds three people, three sets of clubs and three electric trolleys. I will definitely buy again - Carl from Rotherham
Submitted: 2011-03-07 | ID: 7294 | 4/10
![]()
I purchased the car as a 2 year old in 06 and for four years I couldn’t fault it.. it was slightly on the light side for towing a caravan. In the last 18 months the rear passsenger window dropped as others have described cost? £180. Key card stopped working, cost? £75. Lately the clock keeps resetting. I spoke with Renault and was told that the dash has a tendancy to fail!!!. New dash? £700. Mine may stay as it is or may stop. Not much chance of selling it as it is.
Responses to this review
Kevin, if your dash fails, Renault will replace it for £100. It’s a well documented fault with this car. The mileage isn’t carried over though - Richie from Essex
Dashboard failure is a known issue with Scenic II models built between 2004 and 2005 and was featured on Watchdog last year. As a result, Renault has agreed to replace faulty dashboards for £100 if it fails. This is shown on Renault’s website and by my local Renault dealer who will be carrying out the work for me tomorrow - David Martin from Torfaen
Submitted: 2011-03-04 | ID: 7264 | 3/10
![]()
I can’t believe the amount of People complaining about a leaking roof. This is my second CC and both have leaked it is part and parcel of having a convertible roof. The Car is a joy own. So Its got it’s idiosyncrasy’s most cars have. However I must admit the roof imploding sounds worrying . Anyhoo! I love my CC and I’m looking forward to a long HOT summer so I can drive with my roof down and my music on. I may be 43 and I may be having a "Mid-Life Crisis" but it’s good fun and it makes me feel like a "Gangsta Rapper" cruising down Hollywood Boulevard... Hell yer!!! lol :)
Responses to this review
Makes me laugh reading the forums on the cars I’ve been looking to buy since my insurance money came through - I had an Alfa Spider, no roof leaks there, plenty of maintenance but never a breakdown either while the performance, the very pretty bodywork and interior retained it’s charm to the end. And yet what do people who run around in sensible cars which give them so much trouble it seems say about Alfas! Buy one and ditch your Renault with the leaky roof and dodgy left wheel, the Volvo with the garage revisits, the Mondeo with the blown turbo (blocked oil feeds that Ford know about) etc, the Punto with the hit and miss mechanicals etc. Wonder if it’s too late to salvage my Alfa Spider - Romuald Hryniewicz from Monmouthshire
Submitted: 2011-03-02 | ID: 7259 | 4/10
![]()
Why is there no option for zero stars? Can’t believe the four star comments - could guarantee they are employees of Renault. I have been blaming the car dealer but the fact is the car is a disaster from start to finish. Just had the clutch done after numerous other faults and now it has failed MOT on parking brake leading to £600+ to fix. Rubbish car from rubbish company - can anyone give me a list of car review sites where I can bad mouth these cars? I’m going to make it my life’s work to tell the world how bad these cars are.
Responses to this review
I know how you feel. All the Renault garage wants to do is rip you off. It’s time that Renault UK started to do something about the crap electronics and supported customers better - William Allen from County Tyrone
Submitted: 2011-03-02 | ID: 7250 | 1/10
![]()
Thank goodness I read your reports I was considering trading down my adorable and totally watertight Mercedes SLK for a Megane CC. Strangely enough my dealer failed to mention anything about the common leak problem. You have saved me possible grief and for that I wish to thank you all.
Responses to this review
So you haven’t actually driven the car, but have read other reviews and given it one star? That is really unhelpful - Matt Davidson from England
Had a Megane for nearly two years. Never leaked. Totally reliable. Although it seats four, it is a bit tight at the back. Folding boot worked fine. I had the 2ltr privilege. You need the 2ltr for performance because this is a heavy car. Would I get one again? YES - Tina Martin from Nottinghamshire
Submitted: 2011-02-27 | ID: 7225 | 1/10
![]()
The best 4x4 I have driven; sure footed on our steep fields and good on snow, has narrow tyres and under powered so ideal for bad roads, better than my Mitsubishi l200 in wet fields and ice. Down side: expensive to run, spares for 4wheel drive shaft about £1000 and no bearing to fit shaft so only new shaft; the wife loved the car.
Submitted: 2011-02-27 | ID: 7207 | 2/10
![]()
Bought the 1.6 VVT Expression used 3 years ago. The coils went almost immediately, but the dealer (Car Giant) replaced these and the plugs without any fuss. Six months ago the instrument panel went - £100 to replace under the Renault scheme. No further problems until recently, when the dephaser pulley went. Had this and the timing belt replaced by an excellent local mechanic (AutoFrench, Woodford). Renault’s quote was farcical and insulting. The top engine mounting had failed and was replaced. This part cost an eye-watering £125 from Renault. Apparently it’s filled with some kind of shock-absorbing gel - typical Renault complication. I finish paying for the car in a year, and I’m fond of it. I just hope I incur no further expense until then! One more thing, to stop the fan motor failing, ensure you change the cabin filter at least once a year. If clogs up easily and the motor has to work harder sucking it air, causing it to burn out.
Responses to this review
Hi Richie I too have had similar problems to you, do you mind me asking how much was it to fix the timing belt and pulley? I got a quote from a Renualt dealer for timing belt alone for £266 - they said there was an offer on (RRP £455). I think my pulley needs doing too though. Also my car shut off today. No messages came up and I have no explanation. I have to put it through a computer to see what comes up. I would appreciate it if you gave me an idea figure as to what you paid for your repair. Cheers :) - Christina Moohan from Northern Ireland
Could I ask you how much Renault were going to charge for your timing belt being renewed? I have just had to have my engine breather unblocked which is a common fault on Scenics, so I told my mechanic to change timing belt as well. When purchasing another car, I wont be buying any French motors, oh and by the way Renault customer services suck - Karl Thompson from Lancashire
Submitted: 2011-02-25 | ID: 7198 | 3/10
![]()
Worst car I’ve ever had, interior panels have come undone, electrics keep failing, the engine took ages to get going during the winter as it kept conking out when it started. My last Megane was a terrible car, so is this by the looks of it. Don’t buy Renault!
Submitted: 2011-02-23 | ID: 7163 | 1/10
![]()
Bought van new March 04. Looks and drives great, serviced at dealer for first two in order to validate warranty, very expensive, but had it done reg by local garage after that. Normal repairs per service brakes every two yrs on avg etc. New air mass flow sensor at 60k found by AA no power below 2000 rvs had to floor it just to get up a gear, cost £350 at dealer. New boost pressure sensor and diesel hose, diagnostic to find fault £325 at 70k. At 81k and 6yrs the gearbox has gone, apparently this is a common fault on all Renault, Nissan and Vauxhall vans, the cost of a gearbox fitted is £1200 inc vat, but all say do the clutch as well total avg £2000. Timeing belt at 81k avg £400, van is worth in 2011 market £3200. The van still looks great but if I throw the money at it, is it the start of the probs? Shame really the cost outweights the value. The vans are great but enginering lets them down, 6yrs from new isnt long for this to happen.
Responses to this review
I have a Renault Traffic in it’s 7th year of service. About half a year ago, I experienced serious loss of power especially in 2nd gear but 1st gear was also not working up to expectation. I have recently changed the air filter, oil filter, cleaned up all the air and oil inlet, changed engine oil and still not getting much improvement on power. I’m wondering if the air mass sensor that you have mentioned was the cause of the low power problem. Any suggestion on what could have being the cause of this problem? This is my 2nd battery, which is I think more than 4 years old already, but I guess this is not the cause of the problem and it starts pretty well every morning anyway. If you have any probable explanation or experience in low power on 1st and 2nd gearing, please advise. Thank you - Richard from Singapore
Hi, all I can say is you’re lucky. I have had four slave cylinders and clutch, also the seat wore out within 60,000 miles. I had a cutting out problem since 18,000 and now at 120,000 it needs fuel injectors as the same. I had it maintained at Renualt and has cost me a fortune, would’ve been cheaper to buy a Merc. I might be one of few but the engineering lets this car down - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Ashley, I think you must hammer your van and eat too much McDonalds, that’s why your seats are worn out cause I’m on my second one with no probs at all - Patrick Brennan from England
Submitted: 2011-02-22 | ID: 7148 | 3/10
![]()
I bought my Scenic just before Christmas. Since then it’s been in to the garage 3 times with regards to trying to find out why ’Electrical Fault’ came up on the dashboard, but they have so far only come up with ’it must be a glitch’. It seems to only do it in cold weather and as soon as I finally manage to get the thing to 65mph. Last week it was taken into the garage because the passenger door window wouldn’t work. This was found to be due to loose wiring which has been re-crimped. HOWEVER, on picking it up I had to put the heating on to demist... I managed to get about 2 miles from the garage when a plastic smell started closely followed by smoke coming through the heating duct! Needless to say, the car is back in the garage and currently having the wiring sorted! I’m glad it’s all under the 3mth garage warranty still!!! I have a feeling I won’t have this car very long at all!!
Responses to this review
I bought an ’06 model in August last year and within a month, I had to call the fire bridge! It had just been into my local Renault garage to have a burning smell investigated. We were told it was just the air conditioning that needed changing. This was done and we were told it was ready to collect and drove it towards home, but only got about five miles away from the garage when my husband had to pull in as it had smoke coming through from the vents. He bailed out and got our daughter out and waited for the fire brigade - Helen from Perthshire
I have an ’05 Scenic II this Saturday, I also had to call the firemen out. I have three children between the ages of 1-10 and thought this would be an ideal car, WRONG! The car started revving uncontrollably, I couldn’t stop the car and the handbrake would not work. We did finally manage to get the car up on a curb as the car filled with thick black smoke, it was so thick we could see nothing. The car was still revving for about 4 mins after we had got out with the key and pressing stop! The firemen said that if this car would have been a petrol it would have become a fireball. I am just so glad that my children had been at grandparents for the weekend it could have been much worse. And to top it all off, car insurance won’t cover engine or electrical failure. I would never never put my children in a Renault again - Mickaela Ogden from Gloucestershire
Submitted: 2011-02-16 | ID: 7110 | 2/10
![]()
I have just sold my scenic! It has been a pain in the arse. Bought it with good intentions and needed a roomy car as our 1st child was due, but it had constant problems, in and out of the garage. I do look after my cars too!. The last straw was a strange oil leak, then a blown turbo then injector faults. the list is quite long. If I managed to fix these issues I could trade it in on another car for 2 grand, the work it would cost in the garage would reach that. Sold for 500 quid FOR PARTS!!!
Submitted: 2011-02-12 | ID: 7080 | 1/10
![]()
Used as taxi transfer bus for airport work and as hackney taxi. Have done 120,000 miles and no problems apart from changing a bottom link arm. Great on fuel fast and comftable. All in all a great work horse would buy again. Would say it’s never missed a service from Renault.
Submitted: 2011-02-12 | ID: 7077 | 5/10
![]()
About to pick up this car, having had four Renaults including Megane 2 and 3 before. Car is so economical - road fund £30 after free 1st year. Done 16000 on last without a hitch (or service). Simply brilliant - and nicer inside than a golf!!!!
Submitted: 2011-02-12 | ID: 7069 | 5/10
![]()
Its a shame there isn’t a zero rating. I bought the car from the original owner in 2004, and since then it’s been nothing but trouble. Renaults might go well in the drier French climate, but are no good in Ireland’s wet weather. THIS IS THE WORST CAR I HAVE EVER HAD IN MY LIFE. Search the internet for common Renault Scenic faults and you’ll have a long checklist of what has gone wrong. First, the brake pads started to stick, causing an annoying whistling sound when moving. The brake pad release mechanism is passive so gets clogged easily with dirt and rust, hence excessive wear on the pads and discs. After 18 months, 3 sets of pads and all discs replaced, I took it into a back street mechanic, who showed me the simple solution, a bit of grease on the outside edge of the pads when the car was serviced (not carried out by the so-called experts at the main dealers). Next, the damp door pillar led to saturated carpets. Simple solution is to get a 1.5m long wire for a net curtain to clean out the sunroof drainage pipes (located on the front corners of the sunroof opening). Cracked power steering pump pipe. Main dealer said it was ok to drive with care until they got the £65 replacement part in. They didnt tell me that the power steering pump was likely to burn out. Cost another £350 for a new pump. Internal fan stopped working it would blow for a second or so, then seemed to struggle to blow any more air through the vents. Main dealer wanted £350 to replace the fan. I made do for the summer by leaving the windows down to de-mist the car. When it started getting too cold, I had a look under the glovebox, undid two screws and out popped the pollen filter. I gave it a quick was to get rid of all the flies and dry leaves, left it to dry and refitted it. Good as new for about 15 minutes work with a screwdriver. If you’re still thinking of buying a Renault scenic, keep reading. The horn has been replaced 3 times and £60 a time. It suffers from corrosion and will cause a failed MOT. The electric windows are on their way our, with an intermittent jerky movement when winding up or down. Pulley bearing failed, taking the cam belt, gearbox and engine with it. £1200 for repairs. Speedo stopped working. The abs light in the dash has come on (another MOT failure). Paid for a diagnostics check, and main dealer tells me its one of the sensors. The sensor was replaced, but light remains on. ABS pump needs replacing £700 plus vat and labour. Whilst the interior layout is fairly well though out, the constant ongoing little problems will drive you to despair. The main dealers charge a fortune to get repairs done and try to maintain a monopoly by needing to plug in their own laptop to tell you what’s wrong. I’d never, ever go near a Renault again. Seems to be a problem with French cars, I had a Citroen that was a disaster and the electrics in newer Peugeots cause problems as well (although my old 309 was very reliable). The main dealers know all about these faults as well as the easy solutions, but seem keener to start with the most expensive solution first. Still want to buy a Renault?? The men in white coats are on their way to collect you now.
Responses to this review
I agree, my 2002 plate Scenic has flooded foot wells under heavy rain, also my problems with the brakes are identical to yours. My fan blower is not working, I have had to have a new dash assembly. I have made the decision to buy a Ford S-Max or Vauxhall Zafira - Norman Havard from Neath Port Talbot
Submitted: 2011-02-10 | ID: 7052 | 1/10
![]()
Update to post of 03/12/08. Full service Feb 2010. Mot fail emmissions. New EGR valve. Jan.2011 snapped fan/steering belt. Muscles like like Desparate Dan to get home. Feb 2011 full service & Mot. Fails due to track rod ends and ball joints, again. Egr valve faulty, again. Starts 1st time but no power. Saving up to get shut!! Oh for my old Mitsubishi that never failed 160,000 miles easy to work on L200 4 x 4 no turbo and would pull anything.
Submitted: 2011-02-05 | ID: 7019 | 2/10
![]()
Really good car, no probs so far, hope to keep it that way too.
Submitted: 2011-02-04 | ID: 7014 | 4/10
![]()
Just been reading all the notes about this van. This is the 2nd one we have owned 39k in one yr no faults whatsoever. Our previous early 02 plate van did 130k with one issue, h.p fuel pump failure. I really rate these vans. My employee likes it too. I run myself a Vito 115 and must say that the Trafic is more comfortable, been looking to replace the Vito. VW want 23k for the same spec Transporter as a Trafic sport, Renault is 13k. New Vito is around same price, no brainer really, what are you getting for that 10k? All these vans have horror stories but at least with the Renault you have saved 10k to start with in savings. My Vito has had more warranty work than the Renaults I have owned.
Responses to this review
Hi Sean, I take on board what you have said, well you do need that saving of £10,000. I have a ’58 plate that has been off the road for 18 weeks in total and I have spent £12,000 including main dealer servicing and four clutches and slave cylinders including a cutting out problem which has been with the vehicle from new. Now in the garage having all fuel injectors done for me. Reliability is more important to me than price, I might have just been unlucky - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2011-01-30 | ID: 6988 | 4/10
![]()
We have an R reg scenic yep 14 yrs old, and it is still running perfectly fine with 150,000 miles on the clock. the engine is still in perfect working order and not had any problems with it whatsoever. I absolutely love this car and was looking into a newer Scenic... glad I didn’t now, it seems the newer Scenics are having loads of problems compared to the old ones!! We have had it for 2 years and the only thing we have replaced is the clutch!! That’s good going for an old car. So happy with this car, love them and yes I would recommend them, they have loads of space for a family and also like the little added features, the seats are comfy, just love it. I’ll be sad to see it go for a newer car. Also we drove to London and back 400miles without a problem and only used a full tank !! Older cars are more reliable :)
Submitted: 2011-01-28 | ID: 6971 | 5/10
![]()
Terrible mpg, lucky to top 35mpg urban driving. Dealer and Renault say it must be the driver’s fault, or the heater is on too much, or the radio on too long, or we are using cheap fuel. What say you ASDA about that? Dealer had it back twice and said it did 45mpg, but that was in extra urban driving, it should have been more than 55. Treated like a simpleton by the dealer, as if we had never had a car before (in fact had 25 or more) and told we should not expect it to deliver given figures, or it seems anywhere near on any new car and could take up to 12 months to settle down!??? Company policy seems to be ’BLAME the CUSTOMER’. They reduced my wife to tears on one occasion by insisting that it must be her driving. We won’t be buying that Clio in March, or as things stand any Renault.
Responses to this review
I have the same model and even driven carefully it only averages 48 mpg tops. This includes a lot of m/way driving - John Sykes from Lincolnshire
I had the same problem with my father’s car. He’s changing it for a Ford - Rob Adams from England
Got to agree with extremely poor mpg. My dealer has had car back but the computer cannot find anything wrong. I would like to know who or what body approved the figures which Renault issue, these were one of the reasons behind choosing this model - Owen Gallagher from Dumbartonshire
I have one of these and get a steady 50mpg without trying to economise and even fully loaded so your mpg is very low. Have you checked the engine air filter is not blocked? I service mine myself but suggest you find a good independent to have a look, Renault dealers aren’t great! - Brian Allum from Staffordshire
Regularly get 50 to 60mpg on variety of running. Fuel consumption increases when driven over 75mph on motorway or if accelerated hard during urban driving. Definitely not a car for fast getaways - Paul from Lancashire
Submitted: 2011-01-27 | ID: 6958 | 2/10
![]()
Please read before you think of buying one of these vans. I purchased the van 5 months ago, highish mileage at 120k, but thought nothing of this as it’s mint and well looked after. It had a recent brand new turbo, egr valve, recon gearbox, new clutch, all receipts for about 3 grand, ouch! I thought I had bought a good van, what else could go wrong? I WILL TELL YOU! 1 week on abs pump packed in sourced second hand part as dealers want over £300. Soon after, glow plugs, both rear wheel bearings, alternator. Now got a slight oil leak , and now for the best bit, engine sounds a bit noisy of late. Yep BOTTOM END. Another huge bill in the pipeline. I may have only had one of these vans and for a short period but I have learned a lot. My mechanic thinks the vans are crap, he had a Vivaro in at same time as mine, bottom end failure. He has also told me he has had a few that needed injectors replacing but they don’t all come out and the head has to come off due to the rain drainage running down onto the engine and staying there; I looked it up and it is a common fault. As I was at the garage a dealer turned up and began to tell me how cr-p they are. A week later I went to a Renault parts specialist to buy wheel bearings, who told me all the faults with them and there’s a lot. Sorry for going on and on but these vans are a joke, only buy one if your rich and all the people who give 5 stars to these vehicles on here, I’m glad you have had some good luck because it is luck!
Responses to this review
I wouldn’t of bought the van with that history, it’s got hard life written all over it! All vans need looking after from new if they’re not, this will happen. It’s all about spending time searching for a good one. They are out there! Paul Van from England
I agree with the above, 120k in 5 years probably means its been worked hard. The post facelift ones seem not to be so problematical, certainly my ’58 Sport hasn’t put a foot wrong so far. I would say that all vans reviewed on this forum are pretty much equal. Try reading some of the horror stories from VW and Mercedes owners! You would think that paying a premium for one of these would be worth it, not so it seems - Steve from England
Just an update on my initial post and replies. I obviously didn’t get the best van given the problems I have had. But I looked at a few before purchasing and all of them were banged, bumped up and the gearbox on one of them was very notchy. However mine is mint on the body work, the cabin looks next to new. One company owner motorway miles, FSH, new turbo, clutch, EGR valve. I get compliments on how the van looks all the time. I really thought I had bought a good one. Love how it looks and drives but that’s it. The gearbox is now very notchy, first and second engine noisy, and there’s not long left in it. Today, the van stopped in the road as it could not engage gear, the linkage had come off. This van certainly has not been very enjoyable so far, especially on my wallet. Hopefully once fully repaired, it will change my view of these and serve me well - Craig from Yorkshire
I agree. Buying a van with 120,000 is like a lottery. Okay, it has had £3,000 slung at it by the previous owner, it’s not what’s just been recently spent on the van that you should be looking at, but more of what the van has been used for and cared for in the past. Has it been serviced on a regular basis? I have had my van from new in November 2004. Just coming up to 130,000 miles, the only fault has been a steering pump at 120k. I have it serviced every year and an oil and filter change at 6 months with an inbetween service, shall we say, costing around £50. I put Worth fuel conditioner in the fuel tank, which cleans the fuel system out every 10,000 miles. This keeps the injectors clean and all fuel parts lubricated. The cleaning action is also a benefit to the EGR valve, which is still the original. The clutch is also original and will no doubt have to be replaced soon although I must say it is not slipping and the bite is still good on the pedal. Apart from a timing belt at 70,000 miles and two sets of rear brake discs and pads, I always get these with the abs ring and bearings already fitted, that way rear bearings get changed with the discs, and in the long run, it is cost effective doing it that way. Only £10 extra per wheel bearing over having just the disc changed, front discs and pads only been changed once. The track rod ends have been replaced this year also. That’s it, the van is very reliable, six-speed gearbox makes it economical to run, and it is very comfy to drive. Air con requires regassing and timing belt at 140,000 miles, I will prob get a new one when I get to 140,000, and what happens to my van, it will go in part exchange and sold to someone who likes to buy a high mileage van at low cost, just don’t expect me to replace the clutch and timing belt because they are due. That’s for the next owner, the van comes with full service history and the next owner should should take into account what it requires to keep it running. My van cost £12,090 + VAT. Spec is full electric pack alarm windows spot lights etc bulk head and air con plus silver metalic paint in 2004 they are very good value for money as today the same van is £12,799 + VAT, and the modern version can carry a bit more cargo too - Geoff Large from Nottinghamshire
Hi mate, I feel your pain. I bought one from new and it has been off the road more times than Jordan’s love life. It has been the bane of my life, ’58 plate no mileage, it now has done 120,000 and I have looked after it. I have done the miles but maintained by Renault, it has had the best life but it has not been kind to me. Maybe there are good and bad ones out there, just gotta be lucky to find the good ones but mine has had four slave cylinders. When they go, you have to change clutch as well as major cutting out problems. I thought I did it alright, just proves it is not only marriages go wrong. All the best - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Hi, it is good news. I got my van back, it cost me £955. I have found out these vans have a real design fault that the excess rainwater leaks onto the injectors and they corrode. Eventually, they pack up and when they are corroded, they’re a pig to get out again. Hope your piggy bank is full, you need it all. To the lovers of this vehicle, wait until it hits your wallet. It will if you keep it long enough - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
We have just bought our fourth brand new 29 swb Trafic (1 x 100dci & 2x 140 dci & 1x 150 dci), for driving, trim, comfort levels, looks well almost everything they are superb...until they go wrong, in fact they go wrong a lot. Three dashboard wiring looms, four accelerator assemblies, two gear boxes (Renault now want £5,000 to replace one!), three egr valves, one turbo, clutch cables (water runs down cable onto boot & gets in), two clutches, four air con compressors (three on one van) first MOT failure! Track rod ends, two steering racks, usual discs, tyres, six wheel bearing sets and anything I have forgotten or managed to blot out of my mind. I would never buy one second hand and we always get rid of ours before they reach 80,000 miles. I pay around £13-14,000 + VAT for each one whereas a similar spec Transporter would cost £19,000 or more and don’t drive nor look as nice as the Trafic (and also have water pump, half shaft issues). Renault support is amazing with deals of up to 70% support on repairs on a four year old (one year out of warranty) van. We had a Transporter T4 before that the dealer did not even want to replace the broken rear springs (a well known fault) on an 18 month old van. Transits are okay but feel like a very old school van and are too wide for the width restrictions in Cambridge. Renault Trafics, love em, but as we are discovering, get rid of it as soon as the warranty runs out - Duncan Cook from Cambridgeshire
Hi I read your comments and my response from Renault customer care is quite different. They were slow and incompetant. I’m on my 4th slave cylinder at 120,000 miles and did not want to find out what was wrong and also had a reoccuring cutting out fault at 18,000 miles and did not see it as the same fault that they never got right and only paid 35% on the parts only. And guess what? Within one month, 5th slave cylinder has gone wrong. I would never never never never never buy a Trafic again. Worst life experience, it has been off the road for 12 weeks in 20 months, pure and utter sh*t and mine is a real life story - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2011-01-21 | ID: 6925 | 1/10
![]()
This is our 4th one since 2000, tweaked to 154bhp and it is just as good as the previous ones. Currently on 140k the only parts fitted other than routine service are 3 sets of pads to the front, a set of discs, and a set of pads on the rear. Just removed the tyres off the rear as they had done 130k and we usually get 35k off the fronts.
Submitted: 2011-01-20 | ID: 6911 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had five Trafics, three 1.9’s and two 2.0 2003 from new, clutch at 75000 miles gearbox at 140000 miles. I currently own a 2006 1.9 and two 2007’s, which always start. One of the 2007 has stiff gearbox now. GREAT vans!
Responses to this review
Stiff gearbox? Is it hard to get a gear... I had that on mine last week, it was selector shalf bearing - major gearbox strip down, new bearing and selector shalf - Ray from Lanarkshire
Hi Ward I am happy for you but I must be one of the unlucky ones. I have a 58 plate 1.9 Trafic and bought it for the reasons you from new and it has been maintained by Renault, but I have had four slave cylinders including clutch. This is due to a manufacturing problem of the slave cylinder and not my driving, also a cutting out problem at speed which started at 18,000. It is now having all fuel injectors done, also has alarm problem and driver’s seat was worn out within 50,000 miles. Maybe I need to go on a diet. At present, I won’t be buying a Trafic again. Any words of wisdom? - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2011-01-19 | ID: 6906 | 4/10
![]()
I bought this car October 2009, and had noting but problems with it. First thing to go was the window. It just fell down into the door and would not come back up. that cost £100 to replace at a local garage. Second window went 6 months later another £100. Then last summer 2010 Renault recalled the car to fix parking brake. Now the car has check emissions flashing all the time. I have had it checked 3 times at my local garage diagnostics all show no fault. Today the car would not start. Starter button fault or something. I am sick to death of this car. I will also NEVER buy another Renault. If Watchdog was asked to talk to Renault maybe they will audit the flaws in the Scenic and other models. Until then BUYER BEWARE and steer clear of this make. There are some good points to the car, drives well on motorways, lots of boot space and good seating, but not good on narrow country roads and does not handle corners well.
Responses to this review
I completely disagree with this. A lot of manufacturers have issues with window regulators, especially Volkswagen. A recall should not be seen as a bad thing, Renault have obviously realised there has been an issue with the parking brake, and recalled all the models to rectify the fault. Local garages do not have equipment to diagnose Renault’s complex electrical system that even compares the Renault diagnostic software. The plus points in the Scenic far outweigh any flaws it may have. It is an excellent family orientated car with so many useful features and conveniences it’s unbelievable. As for the handling on narrow country roads, that is utter nonsense. It brakes well, handles well, and has excellent road holding for a car of its size and shape. I’m sure Watchdog have better things to do that "audit" the flaws in Renault models, have you any idea how they would possibly carry this out? Have you not considered that Renault will continually be doing this through their warranty claims, and making the necessary rectifications to future vehicles? Was it the cam shaft sensor and dephaser pully that was causing the issue with not starting? That’s another issue you could maybe put in another review? - Colin from Dumfriesshire
Submitted: 2011-01-17 | ID: 6894 | 1/10
![]()
On the evening of the 2nd November 2010 I received a distressing call from my wife telling me that as she went to pull off from St Andrews car park in Norwich the front right hand wheel collapsed. She was very distressed especially when the RAC turned up and informed her she was very lucky this had not happened on an open road, at speed as the car would probably of rolled. She had 4 children in the car and was very upset. I travelled through from Bradenham so she could take the children home and when I got their I was shocked to see the car collapsed on the front wheel. The RAC man informed me that he had never seen this happen before and that it was unbelievable on a car this new. He had to strap the wheel to the car so we could load it onto a flatbed truck to get it home. I eventually arrived home at 1.00am with a bill for £100 for the transport back to my house. The next day I immediately contacted East Bilney Renault Garage and they arranged for the car to be collected. When we arrived at the garage the chief mechanic was shocked by what he saw and I was told that they would immediately contact Renault and that I should speak to their complaints department. They immediately gave me a courtesy car for my wife and have been very supportive and helpful. I contacted Renault and was told that they were going to send an engineer out to check the vehicle and would inform me of the outcome. I have recently received the report and cannot believe what their conclusions are. To claim that the damage to the rubber cover on the ball joint resulted in the joint coming apart due to lack of lubrication is frankly outrageous. This is not even an MOT failure. If every car with slight damage to the ball joint gaitor would result in the the wheel eventually collapsing surely this would be seen as a major problem. I have discussed this with a number of reputable mechanics and they have all expressed shock at how the wheel collapsed. Comments range from "I have never seen this on a car this new" to" it should not happen".
Responses to this review
The exact same thing happened to me on my new 2007 Clio 1.4 Dynamique. It went to main dealers and they could not do it quickly enough, think they did not want any fuss and they appeared as though they’d seen this before. Other than that, apart from being thirsty, it was a great drive. The radio also had to be replaced - Sue from Cheshire
Submitted: 2011-01-16 | ID: 6878 | 1/10
![]()
We brought the car with a host of extras in March 2010 Sat Nav, Cup pack, spoiler, cornering lights, bluetooth etc, however have sold this week due to the diabolical service from Renault in not fixing a fault from after 4 weeks of ownership, being told to fill the car only with super unleaded, being told to leave the car to warm up before driving, refusing to replace car and telling us that there is no fault with the car, the car will not change gear between 1,2,3 without trying to stall. The last straw was this is a track car not a road going car so what do we expect? The car has been in and out of the garage since April to its last visit in late Dec 2010. Renault is a poor product with poor build quality, poor customer service and the inability to resolve a problem. We have lost money but learnt an important lesson, never ever buy a Renault product. If you want to buy this car use only for track days and not commuting or for days out it will disappoint and be expensive to own.
Submitted: 2011-01-16 | ID: 6869 | 1/10
![]()
Hi, bought my 02 Scenic 1.9 dTi Fidji in October 2007 as a second car for my wife to drive. There was 45,000 Miles on it when I bought it with a Full Service History. In Summer 2008 the engine blew up leaving me having to buy another engine from a scrapyard with 60,000 Miles on it. (thankfully I’m a mechanic so I fitted it myself). All was well then on Christmas day I tried to start it and it really struggled. I left the car running whilst I went into the house to fetch some hot water to clear the windscreen. When I got back to the front door I heard the car revving very loudly (I thought my Son was in it) but no he wasn’t. I ran to the car and pulled out the keys and it didn’t turn off! The black smoke was just piping out of the back, there was that much it completely covered the road 4 metres away from where the car was lol! Eventually it blew the engine AGAIN. So I had no other choice other than to scrap the car.
Submitted: 2011-01-14 | ID: 6861 | 1/10
![]()
Only done 21500 miles. Does not pull very well and its gone very heavy on fuel 27mpg, not smoking. Excessive brake pedal travel, had new discs and pads fitted still the same. The gear change is very clunky will not buy a Renault again!!
Submitted: 2011-01-12 | ID: 6844 | 2/10
![]()
Bought this 2007 CC 1.6 beginning of Dec 10, not what I was after but at the price offered from a friend I couldn’t say no. I checked reviews first and was aware of the problems encountered due to leaky roofs but due to price (£5300 27k miles) I still went ahead. Anyway I’ve had no problems at all, with anything...so far. It’s just gone through one of the worst winters of my lifetime and not one problem with the roof. The boot is a fair size and the car is lovely to drive. The only downside would be the lack of leg room in the back for passengers, but it’s not too bad for our two little girls, more of an observation that than a problem, especially considering most cabs only have two seats. I would recommend this car.
Submitted: 2011-01-11 | ID: 6826 | 4/10
![]()
Hi! I bought my Renault Megane Sports Tourer 1.6 56 plate a year ago for around 7 grand. I was a bit sceptical of it with rumours with the accessability of the light bulbs; that’s one problem as the main head light bulbs keep blowing, but other than that a really reliable car. Even on motorways in 5th gear it still has more power, which you can feel when you put your foot down. I only drive 6 miles a day to work and back but very impressed with this machine, love it. It’s a great car, very roomy and an all round decent family car. I have done a lot of motorway driving to gigs and other things, nice smooth ride.
Submitted: 2011-01-09 | ID: 6819 | 4/10
![]()
I have had this car for almost four years, I bought it secondhand with 10,000 miles on the clock. The car was a dream for the first two years, however since then I think I’ve had all the problems that everyone else has described. Firstly two electric windows, along with the coils, the water seeping under your feet when it rains, new key, the parking problem, the dash decided to die and now to top it all off the battery keeps dying. I will never buy a Renault again and would recommend that nobody else does. A complete and utter waste of money!!
Responses to this review
I have had similar problems with my Scenic, my dash packed in and my local Renault dealer wanted to charge me £468 + VAT. I found out they had been on Watchdog, rang Renault head office and got the dash fitted for £100. I hope this helps you and others...!!! Kevin Davies from Carmarthenshire
Submitted: 2011-01-06 | ID: 6794 | 1/10
![]()
Only had the car 2 weeks, it’s only done 57000 miles. Heater plug warning light keeps coming on and it looses power. Mpg is average of 32 mpg, not very good seeing how fuel prices are today.
Submitted: 2011-01-06 | ID: 6786 | 1/10
![]()
I have 2.5 DCI 80hp MWB. I bought it 3 years ago with 26k on the clock. I did 35k miles in it without almost any problems. The only thing was o’ring somewhere in the clutch mechanicsm which is hydraulic. It cost me £300 incl parts to change it as whole unit had to be changed. Otherwise no problems at all. Very economical returning 32-33mpg on the motorway if you keep it at 60-65mph. About 24-25mpg in London which I think for the size is brilliant. Loading is easy as the floor is low, handling regardless of the load is very good. Medium heght roof allows to stand freely when loading which is great for my back. The only thing which could be better is noise level above 70mph. Overall a really great van.
Submitted: 2011-01-04 | ID: 6781 | 5/10
![]()
This is officially the worst car I have ever landed up buying. I bought it 2nd hand in Jan 2010 and within 2 months the electrical problems started. It cuts out intermittently and no garage could find the fault. I have tried to sell it for the past 6 months but no one is interested. I want to cry!! Never buying French again.
Submitted: 2011-01-03 | ID: 6771 | 1/10
![]()
My Renault Megane is 2.5 years old, with 65,000 km. Before I bought it I had many people giving me the ’Never buy Renault, nothing but trouble’, but at that time I fell in love with the design of that Megane and it gave quite a lot of car for the money compared to other brands. After those 2.5 years, I am still satisfied, didn’t have any major problems. Some squeaking noises start to appear from time to time, and sometimes the car radio won’t switch channels, but overall I never had any problems or unexpected costs. I would recommend the car.
Submitted: 2011-01-03 | ID: 6758 | 4/10
![]()
Fantastic family car with loads of space especially in the boot. Drives really well and very smooth. We’ve replaced the dashboard as this is a common fault and Renault do accept liabitity and repair for a small fee...no other problems, very happy with it and always reliable.
Submitted: 2010-12-20 | ID: 6698 | 4/10
![]()
I had my van SWB 1.9 from new in November 2004 on the 54 reg. Paid £11.090 plus vat new , which included metalic paint/air con, electric windows mirrors etc and spot lights and full Bulk head in load area. I have not had a problem in 6 years of ownership until recently, the Power steering pump blew its back off when I put it on full lock one day. But at 116,000 miles in 6 years with a oil and filter change every 9000 miles it has performed very well. It is still on it’s original clutch but put this down to the way I drive and not holding it on it’s clutch on hills. Would I have another? YOU BET! The key is do a mid-service of oil and oil filter every 9000miles and use fully synthetic. As for the steering pump, well you expect something to give after 116000 miles and having read many forums on the trafic van this is it’s weak point power, steering pump or hoses. My front discs lasted until 80,000 miles, but the rears only lasted until 36000 miles? One track rod end and a new hand brake cable.
Responses to this review
Wow, sounds great that makes me feel better, I have had four slave cylinders in my ’58 plate and clutches. This is not down to my driving but a manufactoring fault with the slave cylinders, yes, all four. I have also had a cutting out problem since 18,000 miles. I use top grade fuel not cheap stuff from supermarkets and has been maintained by Renault. I did not miss one service, I did all the right things but now it is having all fuel injectors done. I was hoping for at least three years hassle free motoring. I have not had that but at least it did not cost me £27,000. I guess we all can only talk about our own experinces. It was just mine has not been good. Thanks - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-12-20 | ID: 6694 | 5/10
![]()
Swapped my Citroen Grand C4 1.8 VTR+ for a this MPV and I’m afraid I’m very unimpressed with this Renault. It is woefully under powered and takes ages to reach speed leaving the 6 speed box pointless. Build quality seems OK but the interior looks cheap and plastic, but the seats are nice. Very nice stereo fitted but the lack of ability for it to play MP3s is a draw back considering they added an aux point for an ipod and usb dock. The on board TOMTOM SAT/NAV is good but the addition of a remote seems to be pointless when the SAT/NAV could have been touch screen saving space and one less thing to have ratterling round the car to lose. A very good point over the Citroen is the ability to store the parcel shelf in the boot floor when using the rear fold out seats. Over all an average car with a poor powered engine.
Responses to this review
Why on earth did you downgrade from 1.8 to 1.5 and expect a miracle for it to be like a supercar? Some people are just ridiculous - Seb from England
Submitted: 2010-12-18 | ID: 6668 | 3/10
![]()
Garbage. Poorly made from poor materials. Can’t stop air getting into the fuel line. Gearbox clearly about to let go. Brake problems. well..they are Renaults.....shoulda known better.
Responses to this review
Totally agree with you mate, have your fuel injectors and slave cylinders gone yet? - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-12-17 | ID: 6664 | 2/10
![]()
Quick summary: Issues: @ 40k miles Front ball joints Heavy front tyre wear - changing every 10-12k at £120 a corner for decent ones Electrical issues Key’s stop working Seats heavy - rear ones taken out and have to find soemwhere to store MPG - claims 39 but nearer to 32 even on decent runs. Rust on doors - renault will not do anything about it. It is not stone chips. Dealers are c**p Positives: Great for family holidays - just load it up including the kitchen sink! Very comfy Take all the seats out and you have a massive space. As a five seater it works well. Will I buy another? I’d rather put red hot pokers in my eyes first.
Submitted: 2010-12-13 | ID: 6654 | 3/10
![]()
Purchased the new Renault Megan Sports Tourer in October 2009. January 2010 started car up and and it was very juddery, took it to the Renault garage in Yeovil where car was purchased and was told the fly wheel and clutch needed replacing, unbeliveable for a car less then 3 months old. At the end of November 2010 started car up , juddery again, here we go!!!! same problem as before, couldnt believe it, phoned Renault customer services and was told the problem would be sorted, and maybe it was the way the car was being driven; I’m not a teenager!! This time they replaced the fly wheel again!! The good thing is it’s under warranty still, but what happens when warranty runs out? Not taking the chance, trading it in!!
Submitted: 2010-12-07 | ID: 6624 | 3/10
![]()
We bought our Renault Scenic in July 2010 and since purchase we have had fault after fault. The air conditioning has never worked and the dealership has not been able to fix it, it has had the dephaser replaced and today it is misfiring and there is a ’check emissions’ warning light on the dash - upon reading reviews posted about this fault it seems that the start of 2011 is going to be an expensive one! We tried to give this car the benefit of the doubt when we bought it but please please please please do not make the same mistake as we have and end up with finance on a car that does not work. DO NOT BUY A RENAULT SCENIC YOU WILL REGRET IT!!!!
Responses to this review
I totally agree. I would also say whatever you do DO NOT BUY A RENAULT SCENIC, the electrics on them are totally rubbish. I have had so many problems with this car, I will never ever again purchase a Renault as long as I live. So far I have had mechanisms on two of the windows sorted, replacement dashboard as the whole lot went off last Christmas, which was fun (not). Recently the car was recalled to deal with the parking brake and now the heater/blower/air conditioning which has gone off altogether and I have been quoted crazy prices for replacement of heat resister/wiring. As it appears due to the design of the car it involves a lot of work just getting into the heater itself, hence a very large bill (again) for labour costs. I have contacted Renault Customer Services but to no avail. They say, and I quote "That they are unaware of this problem". I urge people to put pressure on Renault by letting them know of the problem - I have threatened them with WATCHDOG as I am thoroughly fed up with them shirking their responsibility - they DO KNOW OF THE FAULT in my opinion - they know that 04 batches have several known faults but it would appear at the moment they are getting away with it scot feee which is JUST NOT ON. Anyway here’s hoping they take responsibility in the future for this problem but for now I won’t hold my breath - Anne Johnson from Northumberland
Helen, regarding the dashboard light, this could be the Diesel Partical Filter, which can clog if you do a lot of urban driving at low revs. Sometimes, a good run in the car or keeping the revs up for a while will clear the filter and ’refresh’ it. It sounds odd but give it try, it should work - Andy from England
Submitted: 2010-12-05 | ID: 6619 | 1/10
![]()
Best car I have driven and I have had all sorts in my 62 years.
Submitted: 2010-12-05 | ID: 6617 | 5/10
![]()
Just new to this forum. Having worked for Merc and BMW and VW, then changed jobs and now had to find my OWN car for a change, wanted the boot of a Passat, the folding roof of an SLK and relaiblity of a BMW. Well the CC came up as near as the pocket could afford. Even if you have a prob parts are cheap ! I have had no probs, other than having to change my tyres AGAIN after another 1 year and 10,000 miles! What was going on? So this week I changed them again and found the garage could not do the tracking as the ball joints were shot and the bits that go with it. Now perfect! Having thought about it I go over 23 spead humps in total on way to work , I have been advised DO NOT STRADDLE them but go over on one tyre , as the unatural toeing in motion is not natural to a suspension system, sounds fair to me, so lets see what the next 10000 miles bring. Fancy a change, looked at all on the market, VWCC, Insignia, but we all know chaps when the sun shines you can’t beat it!!
Submitted: 2010-12-05 | ID: 6606 | 4/10
![]()
I work for the NHS who purchased the vehicle. No problems at all until about 3 years ago. Vehicle now done over 90K. We have had problem after problem since. Now, mainly won’t start in cold weather. It’s been to Renault and numerous other garages. Latest, new clutch, new belt, new battery, service, MoT, analysed by AA and Renault, can’t find obvious fault. Just returned from Renault agent after all above, this morning won’t start! Heater plug light comes on intermittantly when driving. Nobody can find the problem. Cold or wet weather appears to cause problems. I would have rated 5* until recent, I’m being very generous and forgiving opting for 3*. Just waiting for garage to turn up!! Buy Ford.
Responses to this review
You are lucky, my problems started sooner. With slave cylinders, I am on number 4. Have you had the injectors looked at? They corrode and give you an intermittent problem until they go completely. My van kept cutting out then working and then would not start from cold and wet then go once it has dryed out. Water leaks onto the injectors, get them checked out but don’t go to a Renault dealer, go to a garage that has a hydralic tool to remove the fuel injectors. I rate Sharps of Bracknell, ring and speak to Jack. All the best - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-12-05 | ID: 6602 | 3/10
![]()
The look is unique. There are lips and strakes and vents and slots and a real sense of surprise about the on-road presence of Renault’s new diminutive coupe roadster that is so funky and appealing that it is bound to become a cult car. Big smiles are what it’s all about. Whether you’re driving it or passing by, you can’t fail to notice it. Drop the hardtop at the flick of a switch - and in just twelve seconds the smiles widen, because of the potential enjoyment ahead. This Renault was made for fun. But while it’s as modern as tomorrow it is totally functional and capable of meeting the demands of today’s motorist with the highest expectations. Wind is Renault at it’s best. There’s a certain funkiness of stance and although it’s not butch it is far from effete. Defiantly non-dull: different for the sake of it? What’s wrong with that? So why is it so good? Because it’s a giant leap away from the mundane; from boring clone cars-as-appliances. It’s an indulgence to be enjoyed. From the first moment you sit in the Wind then the word ’humdrum’ ceases to exist. Temptation to drive is written all over the sleek body - so you just have to do it. Once you’ve settled into the most comfortable sports seat with integrated headrest, you start to take in your surroundings. It’s a nifty yet purposeful cockpit - clearly the work of an enthusiastic designer - fitted with welcome features such as power windows, airbags, and a jolly acceptable stereo: and if you’re off on your travels you can take plenty of luggage because the boot space is not compromised when the metal hardtop is down. The wheel fits snugly into your hands and the gear lever is just a tiny reach away so you feel completely relaxed and in control. Back seat drivers are fortunately eliminated because the Wind has only two seats - and who needs passengers anyway when you’re having fun breezing along. You get a choice of either a 1.2 100bhp turbocharged petrol or a 1.6 133bhp naturally aspirated engine and prices range from £15,000 to £18,200. The 1.6 version tested here is probably the best option if you are interested in exploring the cars dynamics to the full. But as with most sporty cars these days, the physical limits are a long way from the mental limits of a sane driver. Responsive steering and an astute set of brakes combine with a chassis with a bias towards tautness at the expense of a gentle ride, which is easily capable of handling the extra power - making the Wind all the more enjoyable with this better balanced combination. Whilst it does encourage you to enjoy yourself, it will only step out of line if you do. A sixth gear would make it more long legged because the car feels rather ’busy’ at high speeds and you know that the engine is ’working’ at anything over 90mph.(Top speed is 125mph). But having said that, fuel consumption is good, with more than 40mpg overall being achievable if you drive gently. Whilst deserving a comment of ’satisfactory’ it has to be said that the ease of gearchanging is not what we have come to expect from Renault. The gearchanges in last weeks Clio Gordini were super slick in the extreme and the contrast was noticeable. Out on the open road things really begin to buzz. Despite freezing temperatures your correspondent felt duty bound to don flying jacket and Peoples Liberation Army hat, lower the top and head westwards into Wales where - with twists of tarmac looming - the Wind really came alive - and so did I as it bewitched me and took me under its spell. Gripping the road with gusto the brisk Wind invited fun, not fuss and it allowed me to indulge in some vigorous driving. The roofless rascal from Renault is a fluid and rewarding drivers delight that is endlessly fulfilling.
Responses to this review
Sounds like a faulty starter motor, pulling too much current - Martin Jones from Essex
Submitted: 2010-12-01 | ID: 6592 | 4/10
![]()
Excellent fun car that, with the additional wind break, is great with the roof down. Had some issues with water ingress but all was solved within the warranty period by the main agent. Sender on fuel pump was faulty (showed as tank never being full ... EVER!) and was replaced. Again solved in the warranty period. My only disappointment is the tyre wear rate. I put Michelin Primacy HP 205/50/17/93W on 13 months ago. Got about 17,000 miles out of them and now they need to be replaced .... all four! Michelen have always delivered me mileage in excess of 30,000 miles on Audis, and BMWs. What are the experiences of others on tyre wear?
Submitted: 2010-11-30 | ID: 6591 | 3/10
![]()
2005 model, had from new, so far 65000 miles and OK. Full tank 580/590 miles. Every 20000 miles one service in Renault dealer. So far so good. Hope this continues.
Submitted: 2010-11-28 | ID: 6585 | 5/10
![]()
Never will I buy another Renault they are just c**p! Had mine one month and head gasket went. Two years later and I buy another, foolish me and guess what? Within a month of ownership head gasket goes again, so what’s the chance of the same fault on two cars? Quite good with Renault! Also, considering it’s an mpv the build quality is rubbish, chairs ripping, plastic bits breaking, just rubbish. Also, the mpg figures are nothing like the figures you get from the manufacturer. I alway had Nissan before, never had any trouble with them, even had a mk1 Fiesta for 9 years, never went wrong. A very Disgruntled Driver.
Submitted: 2010-11-28 | ID: 6580 | 2/10
![]()
For the motorist who has the wherewithal to cock a snook at mundanity, why not, I say, entertain the thought of the new Clio Gordini 200 from Renault with two hundred Gallic horses all tucked up under the bonnet ready to deliver sophisticated thrills for the motorist who likes to leave the crowd behind. Founded by Amedee Gordini - known as Le Sorcier (The Sorcerer) - the brand has long been held in high esteem by aficionados and in keeping with this illustrious tradition which included competition in Formula One from 1950 -1956, Renault have put together an irresistible package of high-tech potency and refinement. The new Clio Gordini 200 is no streetwise fire-breathing monster. It comes attired in the sharpest, slickly tailored suit with the plush interior benefiting from ’Oh so comfy and supportive’ blue and grey leather seats and all the fixtures and fittings like sat nav, air con and other things for the sybarite. But do not be deceived. It’s based on the Renault sport Clio 200 and the Gordini treatment adds looks and luxury and no extra performance. (As if it needs it). This is not so much a wolf in sheep’s clothing as a stealth spaceship tearing through Montgolfier’s balloon. The experience of driving this apogee of dynamism would leave you breathless were it not for that salon-like level of comfort and exquisite elegance which find the lucky driver merely whispering ’C’est si bon!’ Defiantly non-dull, it is a leap away from the mundane, from boring cars as appliances. It’s an indulgence, but lots of fun. It’s the sort of car that demands an international highways committee to redesign and construct roads - the better to indulge the kinetic cornucopia of delights that is this fabulous machine. Existentialism is alive and well once more in this four wheeled incarnation of the essence of speed. French motor engineering has a long and illustrious pedigree - and it’s to the manufacturers credit that they insist on sharing the delights of this irresistible beauty in the face of twenty first century Puritanism with just five hundred fortunate friends of ’La Liberte’ on this side of the Channel. Each Clio Gordini 200 will carry an engraved plate showing the build number.(On test was number one). With 200bhp from the two-litre, normally aspirated engine, it’s a member of the exclusive 100bhp per litre club. Via a six speed manual transmission, performance figures of 0-62mph in just 6.9seconds and top speed of over 140mph are outstanding - so an overall fuel consumption of nearly 35mpg is very acceptable. Out on the open road, overtaking is effortless and, quite frankly, my pal in his big fat Porsche just couldn’t keep up. However it doesn’t have that instant low down wallop that you get with a turbo or supercharger so you need to use the beautifully slick gearbox and delight in the exhaust note that’s music to any enthusiasts ears as the revs rise.. It’s a wonderfully balanced car that is a joy to drive, letting you confidently exploit the performance. It’s surely the benchmark hot-hatch because power and chassis competence are perfectly matched. Fluid high speed A to B travel in one of these is exhilarating and safe and you have the reassurance of outstanding braking capability thanks to the finest ’stoppers’ in Christendom: four piston Brembos! (I can tell you now that I owe much to Brembos, having tested them to the extreme in supersonic travel on bikes.). There are quicker cars, of course, but the Gordini’s smooth capability puts it ahead of the field - and where some hot hatches will tie you in nots if you are too exuberant, the Gordini just massages your ego. In your correspondents humble opinion, not since Bleriot’s visit have our friends across the Channel opened our eyes to engineering excellence of such a high degree. And best of all, you don’t have to ’cherche’ a millionaire in order to acquire one at £19,650. As far as economy goes at nearly 35mpg combined, here’s a car where you can have your croissant and eat it. Reading the specification is like perusing a catalogue at The Louvre. The mystery is not in the Mona Lisa smile, but in the wonderful design package. As I climbed out and shut the door for the last time I was so overcome with affection for this car that I simply had to kiss it on both cheeks and for the next week I insisted on black coffee and baguettes for breakfast. After recent experiences with ’Our Gordon’ this Gordini has all the excitement of the Great Escape. It’s the only car I know that Houdini himself would fight to get into and not out of. Please Mr. Santa - May I have one in my stocking? Ooh la la!
Responses to this review
Buy a Micra for the winter! - Alf Hucker from Durham
Submitted: 2010-11-24 | ID: 6558 | 5/10
![]()
Hi, To non owners these cars are constantly slated yet its funny how most of the owner reviews I have just read are very good! I purchased my 06 Sport Tourer 1.9 dci 130 2 years old with 14000 miles on the clock for £8000 (quite a saving on the 17K list price!). My Megane has now done 50K miles with only a few problems both covered under warranty. First problem was water ingress collecting in passenger foot well due to a blockage in the air conditioning drain which was down to a blocked scully drain originally. Second fault was with the handbrake lever which was tricky to disengage. I have had my megane remapped to 165bhp from 20k miles and still return 38mpg from spirited b road driving and up to 58mpg on a recent trip up north. I decided the soft ride was not suited to the additional power and upgraded the springs which have lowered the car approx 25mm and give a much more rewarding drive. I believe the following things have kept my car running like new; oil changes every 4500miles using correct grade ACEA C3 fully synthetic oil and always letting the engine warm up before I let my right foot become heavy. At this stage I would like to stress just because I have had my car lowered, tuned and make use of the available power I am not one of those idiots who will drive excessively fast in the wrong environment or be a target of those ’’look at that idiot’’ comments as I wheel spin out of petrol station forecourts. I do however like to show the boy racer next to me at the traffic lights that this diesel estate will catch you off guard as they try to cut you up. The only reason I have granted my car 4 stars is because I have had cars with much better interior build quality for a lot less money although I don’t think the firmer ride helps the rattles much. All in all I am still very pleased with my purchase and trust my car to get me where I want when I want hassle free. If anybody would like any further info on anything listed in this review feel free to let me know. Thanks.
Responses to this review
You must have forgot to take the chip out of the old casing and place it into the new one, you just have to hope you haven’t binned the old casing. If you have then you will have to get a replacement chip and have it programmed into the car’s computer, but you can also because of the type of chip used in that model have the chip cloned from the spare key onto a standard t5 copy chip - Stuart McMillan from Ayrshire
Submitted: 2010-11-23 | ID: 6554 | 4/10
![]()
Only had this car for a week and still on cloud 9 after trading in a rather elderly Rover 25. Still getting used to things but a really nice car to drive. Nice side system. Noticed a number of reflections in the windscreen though, is this due to the glass roof? Recently noticed a very irritating noise from the rear drivers side like the wind is getting in somewhere. opened and closed the roof and did get rid of it but still there after another drive with the roof open. Also, noticed that the fuel filler cap is not locking when I lock the car. Told by the garage that I’m not locking it properly with the card (I am!) It’s all ok at work with a secure car park but very unhappy leaving it with the filler cap open in certain other places. Still under warranty so will be returning to Renault on my next day off work! My car has a spare tyre/jack dispite other comments on this page.
Responses to this review
Hi Steve. Think the whistling sound may be due to door glass not fitting into rubber housing when door is closed. Have same problem myself. Easy to get rid of. Just lower window a few inches whilst driving then raise again. It’ll put glass snugly into rubber housing. No whistle! Alex Macdonald from Scotland
Submitted: 2010-11-23 | ID: 6545 | 4/10
![]()
I bought my diesel Modus met red from NTShaws of louth 04 plate, cost £5,300 aprox., with 34 thousand miles on. The car has only one little fault, every now and then it refuses to start on the first key, about 3 times a month, but saying that the car is like new been seviced and looked after, it does approx 62 around town or 66 on a run. The little 1500 DCI is good,runs well, gears perfect, tons of headroom, plus they look trendy,not an old peoples car, it also is nippy, does not drag its heels. Would I have another one? Yes, I would, but go for the 08 model or after; the later ones are cheaper on road tax if you get the right model, but go for diesel not petrol. It’s a funny little car. Marks out of 10? I give it 9 only because the idiot who designed it forgot to leave a gap to change the headlight bulb; don’t go to Renault to get it changed, they are all the same, they dont stop laughing when they tell you the cost to put new one in... How much????!
Responses to this review
I had the same problem a while back which was really noticable in winter. All I did was first clean out the fuel injectors with a cleaner I got from Halfords. You pour the entire contents into the tank and then fill up. Then I changed from buying cheap supermarket diesels (I understand they lack the expensive detergents that go in premium brands and tend to be "waxy" in colder weather) to a standard premium brand like Shell. That was the end of my problem - Don Tracy from London
Submitted: 2010-11-18 | ID: 6526 | 5/10
![]()
I bought my Koleos from Renault, Cardiff and I have had nothing but problems. I was not in formed of about issues the system has when we purchased this car; the vehicle filtration light keeps coming on because we do not drive to the salesman recommendations, we were not told about this by the head of sales. We have taken it back to them on four occasions, now they have stopped us using Renault, Cardiff so we are not satisfied.
Submitted: 2010-11-16 | ID: 6515 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my clio 1.6 16v second hand with 95K on the clock. The guy I bought it from gave me a document about what he had done to it, lowered suspension and sports air filter etc, and he said he had never had any problems with it. I wondered if he was telling the truth, but I have now done a further 60K in the 2 years I have had it and apart from some servicing and a few new tyres brake pads etc, it has been great. It always starts immediately hot or cold and the handling and performance are impressive. I am touching wood as I write but I really don’t want to get rid of it and hope nothing expensive happens. I used to be an "anti french car" person but I just love my clio, it seems to well balanced. The main dealers charge too much for labour though which is a shame.
Submitted: 2010-11-10 | ID: 6477 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve got a lwb, which I’ve had van from new. It’s only ever had only one break down; crank shaft sensor, cost me £30 pound. A very good van, I always floor it, never hang around.
Responses to this review
Hi, I am glad for you but you’re lucky. I have had 4 slave cylinders and clutches due to a manufacturing problem, not my driving. The alarming problem is that has not been fixed. Front seat worn out at 50,000 miles because I am overweight. A metal bar is poking out, mmmmmmm, that is for a ’58 plate - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-11-10 | ID: 6475 | 5/10
![]()
Just bought this lovely car, had a problem with CV joint had to have a complete new drive shaft but under warranty so not a problem. Very pleased can’t wait for some good weather!!!
Submitted: 2010-11-06 | ID: 6451 | 4/10
![]()
Lovely car can’t fault them. On second one which is 2.0 diesl auto. grand espace. its much more comfy than the first one, the gear box started to play up so I traded in for a 08 mod.
Submitted: 2010-11-03 | ID: 6436 | 5/10
![]()
I originally wanted a small estate but bought the Laguna as the dealer had one available at a bargin price because it had done 140,000 miles. I only expected it it to last a year or two but six years later it is still running very well after clocking up with 280,000 miles! Definitely the best car I’ve ever had including Renaults 16, 18 & a Savanah, extremely reliable, spacious and comfortable with many extras. Still goes like a rocket. I’ve just very reluctantly decided to retire the Laguna as it needs new headlights and a catylst to get through MOT. Although rusty around a couple of the wheel arches, amazingly it didn’t need any chasis welding as I had expected. The only faults it has is that the heater stops working and recently it had sometimes become difficult to select first gear. The Laguna’s white paintwork is particularly good as it has retained its finish in spite of the very high milage. The car was still gleaming as I left it sitting in the scrap yard yesterday.
Submitted: 2010-11-03 | ID: 6428 | 5/10
![]()
My van’s been great, drives like a car, also cheap to run. I would buy another, sorry guys...
Submitted: 2010-10-27 | ID: 6381 | 4/10
![]()
I have had alot of trouble with my Scenic. The steering went on it, luckily it was still under warranty for this, only just and Renault tried to fight it cause it was so close to the end of warranty. One of the seatbelts has broken, the hazard lights and auto lock haven’t worked for sometime, I believe they stopped working when the dealers fixed the steering column. Of course they deny it. Now my "smart card" has packed it in. The dashboard keeps reading ’card not detected’. Now I have to wait 2wks for a replacement card from France, but have been told they’ve had delays and it may take longer. The cost to replace is ridiculous. Renault customer service is terrible, no one ever gets back to you, no one ever admits fault.
Submitted: 2010-10-23 | ID: 6362 | 1/10
![]()
Hi, I have had a Renault Modus for six months. It’s very easy for parking, the only bad point is the way that the car accelarates as it’s very slow.
Submitted: 2010-10-22 | ID: 6360 | 4/10
![]()
I purchased my Renault Megane 1.6 RT, in September 2006, and the car had 37,000 miles on the clock. It’s an automatic and has never let us down. It now has 58,000 on the clock and gives a return on a long run between 25-40 miles to the gallon which on a car of this age is quite good. Wouldn’t hesitate to get another one.
Submitted: 2010-10-22 | ID: 6359 | 4/10
![]()
Got a low spec scenic 2004 1.4 16v car has done 100,000 mls, no problems and six years old. It’s just sailed through mot again with no probs. This car his the third scenic and I have had with no problems with any of them. My last one was 2000 scenic which my daughter and grandchildren are runing about in with no problems. Will buy again but must be over 5 yrs old.
Submitted: 2010-10-17 | ID: 6330 | 4/10
![]()
Last car was a 16 00 megane lots of trouble, new exaust, 3 front springs, full new brakes fitted also new starter. Now I have a 54 clio 14/16valve a bit small to put my fishing gear in but had it nearly 3 yrs and no problems, its done 32,000.
Submitted: 2010-10-16 | ID: 6329 | 4/10
![]()
Bought van at 64000 miles. 2 weeks gear box went. Told it was ready and tested, possibly by a monkey, would not go over 30, took back, was then told the cylinder head had gone. 6 weeks for all that to be fixed. They phoned told me it ready and that I needed new brakes, said no way you’re doing it. Turn up an hour later to be told it wasn’t ready and they were putting old brakes back on. So avoid Renault garage in Inverness!
Submitted: 2010-10-15 | ID: 6324 | 3/10
![]()
Well, in contrast to most people here I have a good story! I hesitated in buying mine after reading the scarey stories from upset owners, but I am delighted with mine! I bought in second hand, it’s a 1.9 DCi with 72,000 miles and after 6 months, it’s fabulous. There is the tiniest drip comes in during a heavy downpour, but a convertable with 4 seats giving 50MPG average and more if I drive like an old man, it’s superb! It’s not fast or sporty but it cruises well and I’m a very happy owner.
Submitted: 2010-10-12 | ID: 6305 | 5/10
![]()
I have had 2 years of bankache with this thing they call a car, it’s just one problem after another after another after another. The latest one was due to the safety recall on the electronic handbrake, they (Ren-Oh!) couldn’t download the new software for the recall due to faulty handbrake computer which I had to pay for, so after arguing with customer services for two weeks I eventually only got a 25% discount which brought it down to £423. and now we have the illusive check injection warning when I hit between 2500 and 3000 revs usually when trying to overtake, when it cuts back and you have to abandon the manouvre. So thank you Ren-Oh! for ruining my kids summer (no holiday) and a reduced Christmas, at least Dick Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!!!
Responses to this review
I’ve just had hand brake fail message on my Grand Scenic (56). Renault are going to charge me £704 as they say it requires the handbrake computer to be replaced. Anyone know what this is and if I can get it cheaper anywhere else? Defo would never buy another Renault again: the car has been in for computer software updates, radio replaced, computer thinking it’s consistantly on so drained battery; heating fan failed... again another computer software issue!!!!!!! Jenny from West Lothian (Linlithgowshire)
Submitted: 2010-10-11 | ID: 6293 | 1/10
![]()
Hello, I know this will be of little comfort. I bought my Renault Trafic 2.2 Petrol van new in 1995. I still use the van most days, I feel confident doing 600 mile round trips. Only parts I have had to replace is: the radiator, one rear wheel bearing, window winder, starter motor repaired, front discs. Thats it 103,000 miles still going strong. I always use Fully synthetic oil..burns no oil, still same clutch. Van is fast 100 mph when I cruise at 70 mph can get 35 mpg, from 70 mph to 90mph pretty quick, don’t need to change down. my only Problem and it is a BIG one...What van do I buy next? They all appear to be junk and with lots of problems, and I hate deisels - cannot even spell it!
Responses to this review
I had one of these that I ran to 160k when it had to go due to rust problems. Similar to you it was largely trouble-free in all that time and was still running beautifully when I sold it, I believe it was exported to Nigeria by its new owner. Anyway, the point of this reply is that I replaced it with a new 58 registered Sport van and have not regretted a single day of it. It is faster, quieter, more comfortable and is way better on fuel, I get between 32mpg and 45mpg depending on how I drive it and it NEVER drops below 32. So all in all I would swallow your prejudice about diesels and get one, especially one of the facelift models I don’t think you will regret it - Steve from England
Well my old 1995 Trafic, which I owned from new, has left me at 109,000 miles. Due to losing 5th gear and other issues, I kissed goodbye to my truly trusted Trafic. Luckily, I have found a 57 plate Trafic DCi115 with just 6,600 miles from new...wow! I can do a 500 mile trip and it doesn’t even get tired, you cannot hear the engine even at 100mph. With air-con and power windows/mirrows, it’s another world for me. I won’t service at 18,000 miles as recommended; that’s too long for me. I will change engine oil and filters and fuel filters every 6,000 miles and use the very best gearbox oil which will be Fuchs Semi-syn, and hope this van will be brill, and so comfortable and it’s not white. Happy driving - Roger W from Cheshire
Submitted: 2010-10-09 | ID: 6282 | 5/10
![]()
I bought the car in 2004 brand new off my local Renault dealership. Ever since the car has given me nothing but trouble, you name it and it has broke! With just under 80k on the clock it drives like a car with 180k! I used to own a 1994 Peugeot 306 1.9 XRdt and there was over 220k on the clock before i got my Megane and it was the better car between the 2. The Megane’s engine is dead and the gears dont seem to do it any justice. Electrical problems seem to be the biggest problem with the car, though Mechanical reliabilty aint much better! Overall not 1 bit impressed, NEVER BUY A RENAULT!
Submitted: 2010-10-09 | ID: 6280 | 1/10
![]()
Bought this car in 2006 and is a great runner mechanically, No engine probs so far. However in the last year we’ve had both front window regulators fail and now rear drivers side has gone as well. My local independant garage managed to source first reg elsewhere 110.00, 2nd time he had to go to Renault direct 220.00. Not had third fixed yet but will likely just stop it up. From all the reviews, window probs are a regular and can’t believe Renault haven’t done something about it. I’ll certainly write and complain, but don’t hold out much hope.
Responses to this review
I would check it is actually your regulators that are broken. Can you still hear the motor turning when you press the button? (Even if windao does not move?) I has front passenger window break summer 09, and teh driver one break this summer (’10). In both cases it was a green plastic braket that lifts/lowers the window. It is known to be weak, and easliy broken. Renault tried to charge me £335 to replace the whole regulator - What a rip off! - So I tried to source the plastic brackets. And guess what? Ebay - I found a pair of new design brakets - apparently Renault originals, plastic moulded on a metal body. It took me 1 to 2 hrs to replace. But you need a ’torques’ set. The pair cost me £10, yes £10! Which you can’t buy from Renault. Had several problems with my Scenic, all the common ones. Most recently- Big end bearings! New engine at Renault will cost the value of the car! I suggest anyone with a Renault sell it ASAP. Now driving a Touran, and feel much more confident - Mark Jenkins from Cambridgeshire
I had the window regs go also, Renault in Louth supplied me with both drivers and passengers side clips for £4 the pair. It took 30-40mins to replace each. I’ve got check emissions problem changed all 4 coils and camshaft position sensor. Looks like it’s the dreaded de-phaser pulley problem as it matches starting issues - Daniel Baker from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 2010-10-07 | ID: 6271 | 2/10
![]()
Got made redundant in May 2010. Had to let my 55 plate Focus ST go for something more economical. True, tax cheaper, insurance cheaper, 20,000 miles between services. But . . . . . my ST did 20 to the gallon at 280bhp (yep - chipped and tuned) but the average mpg on the Megane shows 34 with just one third the power (1.6 petrol). Can’t be right surely? The clutch judders when cold but improves when hot. Only 35,000 on the clock. 6 owners though (what does that say??). The plastic bumpers front and rear are different colours from the metal body work and also don’t line up. The doors and tailgate "wobble" when opened. They most certainly don’t have the solid, satisfying "clunk" when closed compared to the Ford. The whole plot is a "flexible flyer" compared to the Ford. Can’t see a reason for 205 tyres when the chassis is so bouncy and twisty. The exhaust judders too. All straps and mountings are in place but it can be heard on up/down changes, accelerating and braking and cornering. The new wipers squeak. I shouldn’t compare a basic Megane to a focus ST. But, even the basic focus is so much more solid and feels far better engineered. I bought the Megane because it was cheap and low mileage. I had a Renault Fuego many years ago but it didn’t have any build faults as such. It simply rusted into oblivion way before they had a chance to surface. Compared to the Ford the Megane has a lot of endearing features but the niggles FAR outway the benefits.
Submitted: 2010-10-03 | ID: 6242 | 2/10
![]()
Great car to drive, good all round vision and easy to get in and out of, also lots of cubby holes for storage, I especially like the one under the passenger seat, which is perfect for my handbag when no one is sat there, stops it falling off the seat. Only a few gripes, when I turn into my drive in 2nd gear it tends to speed up even though the drive is at a slight incline, also there is a vibrating noise on the passenger side where the air bag is and finally the brakes are very keen and sometimes my husband nearly goes through the windscreen when I brake too hard.
Submitted: 2010-09-29 | ID: 6220 | 5/10
![]()
If your reading this review first then its at the top of the list. So before you go any further, if the car your looking at buying is before 2008, the reviews aren’t good. Else its fantastic. But then they haven’t been out that long! The New Megane’s are a joint venture between Nissan and Renault. I’m not 100% sure now which one has bought major shares in the other, but that’s why. Apparently there are a lot of similarities between this car and the Nissan Qashqai. I’ve only done 4000 miles in mine in 5 months, but I can’t fault it. Moves like sh*t off a hot shovel, averaging 55 mpg (get nearer 60 if I’m not on the motorway), lots of toys. If I had one criticism, it would be the way the car is geared. It has only a max 5,000 rev counter, so sometimes when you put your foot down, and the turbo kicks in, your at 4,000 revs before you know it. But the 6 speed gear box means you can sit at 80mph at 2,800 revs (approx) and still manage 50 - 55 mpg.
Submitted: 2010-09-28 | ID: 6217 | 5/10
![]()
I bought my koleos last November mine is a 2/4 I didn’t want to pay the extra for the 4/4 because as a London driver were do I find off road I will never regret buying it, the handling is superb I recently covered 3000 miles traveling with a co driver. What a superb experience worth every penny plus just found out it’s value has increased since purchase by £5000, unheard of, chuffed.
Submitted: 2010-09-27 | ID: 6208 | 5/10
![]()
There is a lot of talk about the roof leaking, no-one seems to have experienced rain leaking into the footwells. An intermittent ’Roof Mechanism Fault’ and random bleeping was the first sign, however we didn’t know at the time the extent of the problem. The roof would sometimes operate, stop halfway through the cycle, fail to initiate and so on. Then the electric windows failed, well some of them, again intermittent. I thought it would be a simple fuse issue or something like that. We took the car to Renault two weeks ago, for a diagnostic check to locate the problem. The report returned a shocking verdict. Leaves and dirt had blocked the drainage channels at the front in the area underneath where the wipers are attached. The water had somehow overflowed into the the passenger cabin, into the front and rear footwells. Apparently the wiring looms have been affected by the water hence the electrical problems. The car was bought in January 2010 for £7,000 and is a 55 plate. It had 43,000 miles. The verdict from Renault is that the cost to repair may exceed the current value of the car. How can a simple problem be so devastating!? I cannot express how disappointed we are to have bought a seemingly good car for the summer, to now be faced with a nightmare repair bill, or indeed nothing at all. My girlfriend and I will never buy Renault again! I will urge people to buy Vauxhall, Ford or Peugeot as an affordable alternative.
Responses to this review
UPDATE: We took the car to a local garage this morning (13/10/10). A professional car electrician has fixed the problem for £100.00! What is Renault playing at!? - Ady Wilkins from Surrey
Hi, would you mind letting me know what your local mechanic did to correct the problem? I now have the same difficulty with my car which I bought only one week ago - Lisa Boyle from Ireland
Submitted: 2010-09-25 | ID: 6190 | 1/10
![]()
I can honestly say that I have not had a days problem with my Megane. Only have 25,000 on the clock, and now thinking about getting a coupe. I would highly recommend. I have had not problems with the servicing either. Wests in Cambridge have been great when I needed to use them.
Submitted: 2010-09-24 | ID: 6182 | 4/10
![]()
I’ve own this car for 7 years, ’til 150.000 km it was an excellent car, after 3 years, the turbo broke up and destroyed the motor. It cost me a lot. Then two years ago the fan went and again two months ago. The electric fuel pump’s gone and now the gear is slipping when I stop. Nobody wants to buy it, no one wants to take as trade for a new car. I have to buy a brand new car or find a replacement gear. I"ll not recommend it to anyone to buy a Renault.
Submitted: 2010-09-19 | ID: 6152 | 1/10
![]()
Well, just had my first breakdown, yesterday, at 81k miles. Bought brand new in May ’08 (57 plate, pre-registered Jan 08), and regularly serviced per schedule. Only previous fault had been a spurious electrical glitch around 50k miles - (radio going on and off, STOP sign on dash illuminating, and trip meter resetting to zero), but van kept going OK. Dealer found there was a faulty earth under passenger floor, and fixed OK. This breakdown was sudden - just died as if stalled, and wouldn’t restart. Plenty fuel, and strong battery. Towed to dealership by Renault Assist (AA) as vehicle still under 100k warranty. AA guy reckoned the diagnostics showed either a throttle valve motor, or fuel pressure regulator. Pump pressure was showing as only 20 bar. Apparently these things need to be at 200 bar for startup, and run up to 400 bar at higher revs. That’s an incredible pressure! Got a call from dealership this morning, confirming fault is the primary fuel pump (apparently there is a secondary pump as well?), and this will be replaced under warranty - should have it back with 5 days. Assuming the van is back to it’s old self, I’ll be happy. I’ll post an update once I’m back on the road. If the breakdown hadn’t occurred, I would have awarded 5 stars, because this van is just brilliant. It’s got such a dynamic chassis, great gearchange, excellent fuel consumption (37-39 typically), good sound system and air-con, very quiet and refined, fast as ****, and looks great. I had heard scare stories about gearbox before I bought, but when I spoke to the AA guy (He was driving a Vivaro 2.0! - that’s what their entire fleet is), he said that seemed to be only the ones on the 1.9 models- he’d not heard of any on the 2.0 models. In fact, he told me mine was the first 2.0 breakdown he’d been called out to. Anyhow, maybe this is the first of many troubles, and I can only wait and see. Perhaps the best thing to do is buy one new, and trade it before 3 years or 100k? But please, folks, get it serviced on schedule! I would certainly buy another one. Oh - and there’s not a hint of rust anywhere.
Responses to this review
Hello. As I stand, teetering on the edge of buying my first ever van I’m reading a LOT of internet reviews. FIRST - the industry should be murdered as there are NO really decent credible reviews on line for vans. So I’m reading your real comments as owners with great interest. Bottom line - I have a mate who is an independant garage owner and helping me to avoid dogs. The short list appears to be (used not new) Renault Traffic versus Vauxhall Vivaro. Jesus, it’s a nightmare to decide - the comment from the guy below who got some insight from the AA guy is interesting. I’m tempted to wait until VW bring out a sexy looking new Transporter - whatever VW do it seems to be the winner of its category regardless of what any other manufacturer tries... anyway - to all readers - any comments on what to look out for on Vivaro versus Trafic please????? Steve from Wiltshire
They are identical, so the only difference in ownership would be if you prefer Vauxhall dealerships to Renault ones! Steve from England
This is aimed at the guy who responded to the original review. DONT EVEN GO NEAR THAT VW T5 VAN!! I am a cab driver and have a VW Transporter shuttle 130 2.5 turbo diesel on a 54 plate. Bought it second hand with 9,000 miles on the clock, at 14 000 miles the gearbox goes, off the road for 9 days while VW try to find a new gearbox on warranty, so no money coming in! 50 000 we start to get an overflow of fluid coming out the power steering reservoir which we were told by VW was a faulty valve in the power steering pump. So back we go for a new 1 on warranty and off the road for another 3 days! All OK until we get to about 100,000 miles and then all hell breaks loose! Turbo goes pop, as well as the water pump, so that cost’s £1,500 to sort that lot out (and off road for another week!). Then to add insult to injury a couple of weeks down the line the steering pump goes completely again! So the moral of this story is DONT BUY VW they just aren’t reliable anymore!! We have a new Renault Trafic 2.0 dci mini bus with 6 speed quick shift on order for the new year and looking forward to it! Paul Mitchell from England
Hi, I bought my 58 plate new and started having problems from the start cutting out at 18,000 miles. It stalls at speed. Power steering and brakes go (great fun when coming to a bend at 50mph - I love to do that). Dealer could not find a fault. The alarm kept going off. The dealer could not find fault. Seat wore out within 48,000 miles with metal poking out from back. Four - yes 4 - slave cylinders. There is a manufacturing problem. You have to change the clutch at the same time. I recently found out that the reason for cutting out is that it has a problem with the common rail injectors. Water leaks onto them and corrodes them. I have replaced them and touch wood, and I mean a wood like a forest - Nottingham will do - it has fixed the problem. It has been off the road 12 weeks in its 22 month life and cost me a fortune. I thought I would get hassle-free motoring at least for two years. Buying new is not my luck. By the way before anyone say it is how you look after it, main dealer servicing at the correct intervals, top notch fuel - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-09-16 | ID: 6136 | 4/10
![]()
I have a Renault Trafic 1.9 dci 100 hp what a van, excellent to drive, driver position is perfect, gears changes are a little too harsh, but if you want to run your van the best you can, use BIO DIESEL!! We average 60+ only thing is you have to change your filters every 6 months to keep it in top notch and on normal diesel we are looking at 40-45. Take care of it and you will be surprised.
Responses to this review
Hi, I’m looking at buying one on an 06 plate which has 100,000 mile on the clock, what do you think? I’ve been told they’re a good engine but I don’t know anyone who has one, I’d appreciate your opinion. Thanks - Ian Puddick from Warwickshire
We bought an 04 model second hand 1.9 with 20k miles. At 40k the gearbox packed in. We decided to put in a reconditioned box as it was £700 cheaper and you still get the same 12 month guarantee. 23k miles further on the gearbox is going again! :( Two days ago woke up and van would not start - RAC man told me immobiliser is not working with key - won’t switch off. Have now had to book my van into Renault to reprogramme keys, if this does not prove successful, I will need to have a new set of keys and dash board ripped out to sort out. I wouldn’t touch Renault again! RAC and AA engineers and mechanic mates have all said avoid Renault and instead go with Ford - Peter B from Surrey
Submitted: 2010-09-15 | ID: 6131 | 3/10
![]()
Got a new one in 2006, has been a pleasure (every mile of the 40.000 I did), I use it for business as a van with all the seats out, and as everyday car. Great on motorway even FULLY loaded. have to admit to some nags, like a squeaking sunroof, (a beautiful and huge one) a cd changer that sometimes needs to be reset, the auto height headlights that somehow decided one day to be really low... and yes, these heavy seats are a pain to store and of course an absolute useless service.... (but from which big company does one get good service these days???) Now going for a near new one (depreciates a little too much to start off with), the grand one this time to get that bit of luggage when going for a week end with many friends! I wish they still did the v6 and would bring out a new model (sorting out the seats) but it seems they are backtracking. Shame.
Responses to this review
Ditto. I have the same model and year, squeeky s /roof. This is the best thing I’ve ever had. Comfy ride, enough power I use it for work and pleasure Cant fault it. Have had one prob where the Traction control failed. Renault wanted £800 to fix it then gave me 20% reduction when I made a fuss. When I put it into the dealer, I wasn’t charged because the engineer said that a notice came on the Renault comp that charging the customer was optional (a yellow note he said) Good man. I’ve been looking for a new model to come out so I’m considering a Trafic. I’m up to 60k and getting a bit jittery about things going wrong. Partner has a Scenic no problems - V Crane from England
Submitted: 2010-09-15 | ID: 6128 | 4/10
![]()
Bought it on looks and practicality nearly 2 yrs ago with 100k on clock. Looked after and serviced, done 17k since. Went from Hull to Nurburgring and back towing a lotus on a tankful! Auto box a letdown - rolls back on hills, as it is a manual box with auto changer! Been warned, and waiting for the `box or steering pump to go, and now have oil pi**ing out from under van, so no doubt I will find out which one it is tomorrow! - Watch this space!
Submitted: 2010-09-10 | ID: 6102 | 4/10
![]()
Just an add on from the previous note. Set off yesterday for a road trip to europe Ha Ha, didn’t get very far about, 289 miles. The engine started ticking very loudly and then lost all power. I got the van recovered to a garage in London - the engine is now in bits. I have got to ask the question "What did Benfield motors do to the engine whilst it was in their care?" I don’t know if it is a problem with the van or the dealer tinkering with something they know nothing about...
Submitted: 2010-09-10 | ID: 6096 | 1/10
![]()
My van has been nothing but trouble - the list of faults so far as follows!!!! Factory recall: bonnet catch; factory recall: lighting rewire; factory recall: back door not opening, gearbox bearings, drive shaft, power steering pump, clutch adjustment, gearbox bearings again! I sent it in for a dashboard rattle and clutch judder to be told there was "nothing wrong"! Two days later I took a mechanic out to show faults - I needed new clutch dashboard refitted and TODAY!!! THE HEATER HAS STUCK ON FULL HEAT! I think that is about it - I would never, ever recommend or buy another Renault. Full stop. They should all be recalled!
Responses to this review
Hi, I own a 2004 Renault Trafic and have spent a fortune on it. Abs pump, gear linkages, power steering pump, masses of warning lights that keep coming up. All I’m saying is never buy a Renault!!!!!!! - Dan Clarke from Bedfordshire
Well I think you guys have been singularly unlucky. Apart from a wiring recall and dash light module that were sorted out under warranty during routine servicing my ’58 Sport has been totally reliable and a joy to drive and own. My experience gives it 5 stars - Steve from England
I have had lots of faults with my 58 plate Trafic 115 sport which I’ve had since new. Most faults have been there since day 1 and Renault have said most of them are "model characteristics" which means they’re design flaws which affect ALL Trafic’s. These faults include:- Clutch judder wobble from front when pulling away, changing into 2nd; clutch bearing noise when depressing clutch; loss of torque at low revs (below 2500 rpm); intermittent 2 stage remote locking; ABS warning lights and "serv" light; door glass getting stuck; uneven travel clonk from steering on full lock binding brakes etc... NOT GOOD - Marc Wood from Essex
Strange, I’ve not had any of these probs. I wonder why?? Steve from England
Submitted: 2010-09-10 | ID: 6095 | 1/10
![]()
Bought the van 3 months ago. Crank shaft sensor faulty, but now brilliant. Don’t thrash it and it will be ok. Good luck.
Submitted: 2010-08-30 | ID: 6025 | 5/10
![]()
Acquired van from new at sunwin Renault, recalled in first yr for handbrake prob, serviced at each specified service period, received the Renault health check each time the van went in to them. Last year creaking from front lower arm ball joint, replaced under manufacturers warranty. December last yr had service and mot. This month, van back in and needs lower arm ball joints, track rod ends, anti-roll bar atc, £900.00 worth of work req’d. Have so called lifetime warranty with Renault, guess what...don’t want to do it under warranty! Make me wonder what they’ve been doing with it past 4 yrs..it’s a joke.
Submitted: 2010-08-30 | ID: 6022 | 3/10
![]()
March: New auto gear box. June: New defazer and handbrake adjustment, then work done on steering and suspension and a new timing belt fitted (following a dealership "health check")! July: New dashboard. August: Electronic faults including 4 new coils fitted; waiting for another tow as keeps stopping and won’t pull. Total cost so far £3,500 in 6 months. The car is only worth £3,500. Mileage? 37,000!
Submitted: 2010-08-30 | ID: 6021 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this as my first own car, I’m 19... I find this little car to be brilliant! It’s great fun and grips to the road really, really well, it’s comfortable and really fuel efficient... Definitely a 5 star!
Submitted: 2010-08-27 | ID: 6011 | 5/10
![]()
Got mine 2nd hand with 67 000 miles. Now on 92000 miles . I’ve had, what it turns out to be, the common problems; Broken front springs, both sides, one of which went though the tyre. Ignition Card button with a much too high cost to replace at £140. Rear screen wiper motor. Starter Ring gear on the flywheel worn out at 67000 miles. I will not be buying another one. However, it runs well and gives very good mpg.
Submitted: 2010-08-25 | ID: 5993 | 2/10
![]()
Bought from new in late 2003. Alternator had to be replaced 3 times under warranty and then driver’s seat collapsed. Took out a year’s extension of warranty in case disasters continued, but no further problems! Radiator rusted through and cost about £200 to replace, but servicing not expensive and only every 18000 miles. (Haven’t paid main dealer prices but found good local garage). Now just had it MOT’d at 90000 miles and had to spend about £700 for new springs and new cam belt (which we should have had done before). So no complaints. Never failed to start, economical diesel engine, never broken down. Problem is, what do we buy next? Having downsized for retirement want a somewhat smaller equally reliable car, but reading reviews puts me off any replacement!
Submitted: 2010-08-16 | ID: 5940 | 4/10
![]()
Stylish, compact and fun, the name Twingo trips off otherwise resolutely Anglo - Saxon tongues as the latest little Renault redefines the small inexpensive supermini as a thing of joy on twisty roads that duck and dive - yet it makes you equally happy slotting into a parking bay in Lilliput. French rationalism made metal, it is certainly modern, functional and thoroughly alluring with lines that are soft and simple yet distinctive and attractive enough to turn heads in the morning crawl. From most angles this little car looks splendid - and with glossy red paint, the test car was nothing less than arresting or intriguing - or maybe both. It’s a comfortable and well-equipped package too. In line with the Renault credo, which seems to say that driving should always be a pleasure, the Twingo is good for short hop and long haul alike. Wide opening doors give easy access to an interior that is simple, tasteful and brilliantly executed. It’s a terrifically habitable and attractive cabin and there’s room for four in comfort - but, of course, having only two doors, access to the rear seats is not particularly easy for some. Shut the doors, run your hands over the quality seat fabric and try out the controls: everything is fresh and funky and inspires confidence. There’s a sense of integrity and solidity that is detectable as soon as you drive away, too. The Twingo feels like a mature small car you can trust and the ’I-Music’ 1.2 16V 75bhp’ tested, which costs £8,695, has enough gee whizz technology to make it competitive in its sector. I was pleased by its specification, which includes ABS with EBD (Electronic Brake Distribution) and brake assist. It offers all the best qualities that one wishes for in a small car. A singular pleasure is the way this car drives compared to rivals. As different from an inscrutably utilitarian Japanese Microbe as nuclear fusion is from your garden composter, this is a car with zest that can put a demonic smile on your face. Even though there are not many horses under the bonnet it feels a lot faster than it really is. You can tootle about at a sedate pace if so disposed, but use the whip in the upper reaches of the rev range and you can zip about as if your underpants are on fire - all the way to 105mph.. Motorways, of course, are quite simply boring in a Twingo because the 1200cc motor doesn’t pack much of a punch low down and is not for hauling up long slopes leading to an ever receding horizon. From a purists point of view it is a rewarding car to drive quickly all the way to its top speed. Meanwhile, official consumption figures say you’ll get over 55mpg overall. Should you decide to bimble about with a smile on your face and a long queue on your tail, I’m told that some members of the Evergreen Party have achieved near 70mpg. on their way to save the world. By and large though, the endearing thing about a Twingo is the handling. What it has that some rivals don’t is the comfortingly vicelesss way you can tackle bends wholesale rather than one at a time. Thanks to the steering’s acuity it turns in keenly and feeds back plenty of road surface information: it always feels secure and grippy. Stop dead anchors, of course, inspire further confidence. The Twingo simply feels good to drive and it is an absolutely easy, reassuring and relaxed car with which to live. Add bags of brio, nimbleness, practicality and refinement and you get a winning coalition. It won’t, of course, seduce the City banker or the reader of Atom Bomb Cars magazine. It’s hardly a pocket rocket, nor will its ownership confer plutocrat status. But trust me: it’s certainly appealing and proves the point that there’s still some pleasure to be had from motoring.
Submitted: 2010-08-15 | ID: 5923 | 4/10
![]()
Bought this car in sept 2007, within 1 month, started to get "check Injection" light on dash, went back to dealer 4 times as it was still under warranty, each time the dealer said they had fixed the problem to no avail, finally had to have a complete new turbo charger, which Renault eventually agreed to pay for. Car had only done 36,000 miles. Since then it’s been back to the workshop every couple of months, New Dashboard replaced under warranty after 25,000 miles New alternator = £300 New Heater Ballast control = £360 Water pouring in due to engine bay drain plugs blocked = £170 Air Conditioning packed up = £750 to replace, have not bothered Timing belt £670 to replace - OUTRAGEOUS Bonnet blew open whilst driving on the motorway = £1500 worth of damage. Now on last day of holiday in France, engine started to sound like a bag of spanners, found out the Big End shell bearings have gone, possible £1500-£2000 to fix. Seems there are major problems with the Scenic II c.2004, but Renault are not interested, looks like they only design their cars with a shelf life of 3-5 years to enable their dealers to make a mint. Have got two years of finance left on this car and it makes me want to weep. Will never buy another Renault again. Our other car is a Rover 420SDi, 12 years old, 125,000 mles never had a problem with it, Curse the Govt, Jeremy Clarkson and the British people for not supporting them and letting them fold.
Responses to this review
Mark, You say that you still have two years worth of finance on your car. Is the finance from the dealer or is it from another source e.g. a bank loan? If it is from the dealer then there is one little trick I discovered when dealing with a thoroughly rubbish Ford Galaxy (bought from new). Check the small print of your finance deal and you will find a clause which tells you that until the final payment is made the car remains the property of Renault. I argued with Ford for years about innumerable faults on the Galaxy we bought until I said to the service manager "take YOUR car back". At first he said it’s not Fords car it’s mine, that’s when the penny dropped with me. When I said ’actually it’s not my car until I’ve made the final payment, it’s YOURS’ his attitude changed instantly. No matter what they tell us about quality control it’s just a numbers game. Occasionally you get a Friday afternoon car (the Germans call it a Monday morning car) comes off the production line, that is just plagued with faults. There’s no way to return the car to the manufacturer, it has to be returned to a dealer, and none of them want a bag of s**t (that they know about) on their forecourt. To Ford or Renault 0.01% of all cars they produce being absolute lemons is a good record. BUT to you or I being the unfortunate soul who bought the 10,000 th car which just constantly fails it’s an economic disaster. Ford cost me over £4,000 in hire cars and lost earnings on a car I bought from them brand new for £25,000. I expected that I would have 5+ years of trouble free motoring spending that much on a car, and I can honestly say in 20 years of motoring the Galaxy spent more time in the garage than any other car I’ve ever owned - Including those early cars we all had that cost us £500 or so. The main point for you though Mark is to tell them to come take THEIR car away and see what response you get!! - Paul McGuinness from Inverness-shire
Submitted: 2010-08-15 | ID: 5920 | 1/10
![]()
I bought one at 3 years old, and all that went wrong was the electrical management box when the indicators wouldnt turn off. Then at just over 100k miles the gearbox completly went. The reconditioners moaned because it wasn’t usable. Then at 123k miles the gearbox went again. the gearboxes on these can go at any milage but around the 100k mark seems to be most common according to my mechanic who had one in at 30k just two weeks out of warranty and they wouldn’t repair it under warranty. Verdict smart at first, fast, quiet, then service costs begin to kick in . The gearbox ought to be redesigned, it’s not up to the job and it’s widely known now. Give it the boot. So I will probably sell it before it goes wrong again and buy a VW Transporter.
Responses to this review
I have heard Transporter gearboxes are just as bad and driveshafts give a lot of trouble too. Seems it is a case of luck of the draw after reading all the van reviews. Fingers crossed... my Trafic is so far problem free but will change it before the mileage climbs too high - Steve from England
Early Trafic geraboxes have a very small oil capacity (later 2007 on are considerably larger) for their size and any small leak will spell trouble - as with any other manufacturers gearbox. So keep an eye on all the gearbox seals and replace as necessary - not a dear or difficult job for a competant mechanic. I change the oil in all our vans gearboxes at every service and have never had one go, not even in my oldest 190,000 miles +. A lot of crap is spoken in the forams about many things and 99% of the time it comes down to how something is used and how its looked after. If I had one van that gave more problems than the rest I would look at the driver - Martin from Buckinghamshire
Hi there, could you tell me what grade of oil is needed for a 2003 Trafic and how much goes into the gearbox? Cheers - Robert Morgan from Ireland
Submitted: 2010-08-12 | ID: 5904 | 2/10
![]()
I have the lwb 2.5d ci Trafic 2005 - 40,000 miles full service history. I went through a shallow ford at 5,000 miles and wrote off engine and turbo. At 20,000 miles had new master and slave silenders; at 39,000 miles engine mount broke smashing up drive shaft and now in for fuel problems. What next I ask?
Responses to this review
They weren’t designed to be driven through floods! - Mike Smith from Buckinghamshire
You will find your problem is the fuel injectors. Water corrodes them so going through a Ford did not help, but I have had 4 slave cylinders and feel your pain, they are designed to cost you money - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-08-10 | ID: 5877 | 3/10
![]()
Had the car from early 2006 when only 6 months old. Had the normal faults like the dash-board being replaced, seat-belts being re-called, hand-brake needing to be computerised, rear light unit being replaced as filling up with water. Had service done at local Renault garage, as always and nothing required but new tyres. Now just a few weeks later, a loud knocking noise from the engine. Called out RAC and took it to Renault garage. Told that Injector 4 has a fault, sump to be replaced and engine knock from the bottom caused by the injector fault. Then told that we need a new engine and advised it was not worth doing the work. Only at 79k. Can’t believe that all of this can happen with no warning. Car is well looked after and now told worth £300 for scrap!!! Can anyone help with if we have any comeback with the garage. Please, need some help. Thanks.
Submitted: 2010-08-10 | ID: 5875 | 1/10
![]()
First fault; dash went out followed by electric power steering, motor failure followed by fuel primer pump perished not letting fuel to engine showing up as injection fault chugged when putting foot down, now rear window dropped down. Owned 12 months 48 000 miles, nice drive but don’t buy one.
Submitted: 2010-08-07 | ID: 5857 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my Megane CC new September 2007. It has now done 17000 miles. The only tiny leak I have had from the roof is in exceptionally cold weather when the glass in the passenger window, when the door is closed, fails to tuck under the roof seal. If the window is lowered and raised it tucks in nicely as it should. I think the seal is not as flexible as it might be when below 3 degrees so the glass stays outside rather than inside the seal. In muggy weather the fog lamps have condensation on the inside but the handbook does mention this and they have always dried out when the air has become fresher. I am sorry others have problems, I would recommend Renault after my experiences over 3 years.
Submitted: 2010-08-05 | ID: 5837 | 4/10
![]()
Bought new in December 2004. The steering rack went at 18 months old and was repaired under warranty. The alternator went at just over 3 yrs old but was replaced by Renault when asked, even though out of warranty. It has been well serviced from new and changed oil first time at 5k. It pulls like a train fully loaded and towing my 18’ caravan. You do pay the price at the pumps, with the big 2.5 lump, 31mpg at best. Only on second set of tyres and replaced pads once; discs, gearbox and clutch original. Think I must have been lucky so far. Considered buying a new Vito next but seen some real horror stories.
Submitted: 2010-07-28 | ID: 5780 | 4/10
![]()
I own a Trafic 04 plate, bought it new. I was very happy with it to start with even though it went back after a week as fuel flap would not open. Problem fixed imediately. Took it to Renault dealer for first service where one of the workers there took it for a joy ride to the local macdonalds. Service cost over £200 pounds, most exspensive car wash ever! Anyway getting to the interesting bit, at 60,000 miles the gearbox got stiff, I took it to my local Renault dealers where they took it for a test drive and said everything was fine but it would be best to change gearbox oil, which cost £130. Three weeks after the clutch went. This time I took it to a very highly recomended family owned independent garage. when removing the clutch they noticed the bearings in the gearbox were shot. Yes you guessed it, I had to replace the gearbox. 12 months later and another clutch, the engine decided to blow up. To cut a long story short the van is six years old now it has had 4 clutches, new gearbox, new engine, 2 sets of bearings and that’s just the bits I can remember. Ok its done 115,000 miles now but it has been looked after and serviced regular. Please take time to read this if you are thinking of buying one. They look good and drive nice on a good day, but be warned. I have spent 8,500.00(pounds)on this van on top of what I paid for the van new. Owning a Renault Trafic can cause serious weight loss to your wallet.
Responses to this review
You are so right. I have spent £12,000 on four slave cylinders, clutches, injector, anti-roll bars and the list goes on. They look the part but they don’t cut the mustard. Unless your wallet is fat, stay away - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-07-27 | ID: 5772 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car new in August 2009 from a Renault dealer in Dresden. I had test driven a couple of versions, both with the new TCE engine, a seven seater and a regular sized version. The TCE was OK, but for me, the extra performance was not worth the extra 1000 euros, plus, it is a turbo, it is always running. Instead, I chose the 1.6 bog standard petrol model. Since then I have driven it every day, driving to work on an average of 90 kilometres a day, and taken it to England twice. I have two kids, so it must bear the rigours of family life. It has done so admirably. I have had no problems at all in a year of driving this car. The ride is good, the comfort level of the cabin is first class and I drive in a variety of different road and weather conditions. Smooth, fast Autobahns, to pot hole ridden DDR roads. Everything taken in its stride. In summer, with normal Michelin tyres, I average 8.2 litres per 100 km. In winter, with Pirelli winter tyres, this figure climbs to 9.2. I have covered 25,000 km in this time, and there has been not one single problem with this car. I part exchanged it with a 1999 mark 1 model which had 135,000 on the clock, and had had problems since 110,000 with electrics, mounting and cylinder head gasket. I took a bit of a punt buying another Renault, but so far I am more than happy. I do not intend to keep it beyond four years though. Perhaps I will buy another Renault after this, or plump for a Dacia Duster, let us see. Dresden, July 2010
Responses to this review
Does anyone know what the weight of a scrap Renault Scenic shell is? I stripped mine and scrapped the shell, but I think ive been ripped off? The people at the weigh in bridge said it was 0.360kg, but having scrapped many vehicles in the past, I am quite sure that this is the sort of weight you would expect for something like a rover 200 or any other small car, not for an MPV. Any insight would be GREATLY appreciated!!! Thanks in advance :0) - Shelly from England
This is to Shelly from England - whoever told you the weight of the shell being 0.360kg needs to be shot... then shot again! They are having a laugh Shelly, 0.360kg is less than the weight of a bag of sugar! If the shell of the car DID weigh that, you would have been able to carry the shell yourself to the scrappys under one arm. I would have expected the shell weight to be more in the region of 400kilos, thats the BARE SHELL. Maybe the figure you are reffering to is 0.360 of a Ton?? Gary Scott from Somerset
Submitted: 2010-07-26 | ID: 5752 | 5/10
![]()
Hi! I’ve had the car 28 months and never had any problem with the car whatsoever. Really impressed with the acceleration and handling. Fun car to drive, looks very good with the roof up or down, comfortable. Earlier I owned Ford Escort, Opel Vectra, Megane I classic, Skoda - Octavia, Megane II hatch - good cars, but all of them were (excuse me please) a little soulless. Presently Megane CC: the car is 4 years old – but still a head turner! I think the only downside is that you can’t get a spare wheel. So : Good luck & a lot of safe miles & safe returns every day for everybody with CC (= "Cri du Coeur!")
Submitted: 2010-07-24 | ID: 5744 | 5/10
![]()
So I am not alone then with a leaky roof! Torrential rain yesterday leaked through and soaked a large portion of the passengers seat. For info, the car was parked on a flat even surface, so for those being told it is because the car is at an angle, is rubbish! Main issue is the leaking when driving - exhilarating, going round corners etc - personally I find this a dangerous distraction, as you sometimes (even though I am a good driver) I cant help but try to see where it really is leaking from. Not to mention rather embarrassing if your passenger is being soaked too! Even though the leak is extremely annoying (hence googling to find out if it is common!), I do love this car. This is my 4th Megane, the last two were soft tops (and not one leak from them I may add!!!). However, this car is an absolute dream to drive. 1.6, 2006 model, bought it 3 months ago with 9,500 miles on the clock, immaculate condition. I hardly find an urge to go above 60mph, as it makes you not want to be in a rush to go anywhere. It is smooth, spacious, airy and elegant. Would I recommend this car? Definitely! Even the top-of-the-range cars have their problems, so please don’t dismiss this car too easily. Note: I think Renault should give us a % of their sales, if any of our positive reviews help sell some of their cars!! :-) Happy driving, if its not raining that is.....
Responses to this review
Hi, I’ve been looking throught the internet about Megane convertibles and the roofs leaking as one morning after a heavy night of rain I got in my car to find the seats soaked, when I took it to the garage I bought it from they agreed to replace the seals on the roof. They then said it was something to do with the windows as they are supposed to come down a little bit when you open the door then go back up when you close it, they then said that apparently all models 2007 and above have some new seals on the roof which don’t leak at all. Its getting fitted on my car at the minute, will let you know how it goes - Nichola from England
Love my Megane Coupe Cabriolet 2008 model BUT NOT THE LEAK, been leaking since new, going in for 4th attempt to resolve the problem! Still under warranty until June ’11. Hope it gets resolved this time but lost all faith! AnneMarie McLaney from Lanarkshire
Submitted: 2010-07-23 | ID: 5735 | 5/10
![]()
Great motors. Have had 5 different ones over the past 4 years, which never let me down. All bought with between 48,000 miles and 145,000 mile yet never given me a problem. Had one 1600cc petrol and head gasket twice in 3 weeks. Petrol engines are known for head gasket and the latest 2003/onwards especially the electric hand brakes control unit behind the drivers side rear wheel gives big trouble at£400-00 to replace pus fitting charges. One flat battery coast me £1750-00 to have the electrics repaired. This was a 1.9 dci model with electric hand brake. Sold the car to a dealer before I had it repaired.
Submitted: 2010-07-22 | ID: 5733 | 4/10
![]()
As a Renault owner I have had many over the years including the Dolphin, Renault 5 Alpine also Renault 18 gtd and the Renault 18 petrol also on my collection 4 Renault 25 plus 1 Bacarra and now my Laguna. This is my second Laguna to me there isn’t another family car to compare. Over 40 plus years I’ve had many other cars, Fords Vauxhalls, Jags Hillmans, Humbers and to me the Renault Laguna is probably the best in its class; that’s my opinion.
Submitted: 2010-07-20 | ID: 5718 | 5/10
![]()
I have just traded mine in for a hatchback Megane after having her for 2 years, as I have a small baby and found it a bit of a struggle. I absolutely adored my Coupe Cab, although it never passed an MOT without niggly bits needing doing, and not very cheaply either. Passenger window regulator also went, and Renault advised it is a common occurence in these models, so they paid 75% of the bill - so I urge you to go to Renault dealer if you have any window problems! I highly recommend, but doors are too wide!
Submitted: 2010-07-19 | ID: 5705 | 4/10
![]()
I have had two other Renaults before with probs, but this 1.5 dci Scenic takes the biscuit. I will never buy Renault again, customer service sucks, they always make excuses, good piece of Renault training that. They won’t own up and pay in full for any known manufacture faults. My 2005 1.5 dci, although comfortable to drive has had numerous electrical faults,i.e. needed a full wiring loom change, my reversing sensors don’t work, I had to get dashboard changed although Renault admitted about the fault I still had to pay £100. Total rubbish. Now I have an EGR VALVE FAILURE! Never will I buy one again, let this be a warning to other Megane/Scenic drivers, total c**p customer service.
Responses to this review
I totally agree I have a 2003 Renault Scenic and have lost count of the problems I’ve had. Both back windows stopped working. The display panel went and I had to pay £100 too. In the last three months it’s been to the garage twice with problems with the airbag and now the head gasket has gone. The back door doesn’t open from the outside but from the in - so much for child safety locks. I would never buy a Renault again. Stephanie from England
very disgruntled owner of grand scenic 1.5 dci 54 plate. I vow never to own another Renault. I too have had new dash at £100 - an insult considering it’s clearly manufacturing fault. Have just had to have a new engine at a cost of 3k (not via main dealer i hasten to add!) still have very rough idle (which was there before) and am told it probably needs new injectors @ £600 for parts alone and again that’s not via Renault. Also having intermittent starting failure IE tries and fails then at second push it will start. Am told this is also likely to be injector issue, never had that problem before the engine was replaced. It’s a heap of junk - never again. I could have bought a brand new (albeit smaller) car for less than this has cost overall - Karen from Devon
Are Renault still offering to replace dasboards for around £100? - Denise from England
Submitted: 2010-07-16 | ID: 5678 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my 1.66 Dynamique new in Jan 07 from Motorhouse at Cannock (Import) Very good deal and UK spec car. Did 21k in 3 years, only problem we had was a sticking rear brake(fixed under warranty). Excellent dealer service from W .Lewis in Telford. My wife and I loved the car and found it very comfortable and practical, not too bad on fuel either. Had to work the engine on acceleration-but it is a hefty car for a 1.6! Sold it in March and have bought a Saab 93 Cabriolet as we wanted to be able have 4 seats that can be used. Like the 2010 model though!
Submitted: 2010-07-14 | ID: 5663 | 5/10
![]()
A super car to drive around town - it has a fantastic turning circle, great visibility and driving position, is suprisingly whizzy and goes forever on a gallon of diesel. Next time I will choose one with the sunroof and in a brighter colour.
Responses to this review
What do you get mpg on your diesel on a longish run please? Thank you, Julie Rainbird from Shropshire - Julie Rainbird150[at]hotmail.com
Submitted: 2010-07-11 | ID: 5631 | 4/10
![]()
I first bought a 1.4 1998 clio. I got it for £480 so I was expecting it to need a little money and time spent on it but I have now purchased a 1999 1.6 Clio and I have noticed a similar problem in both Clios and it is that they pull to the left slightly. With my 1998 Clio I took it to have the tracking done and it was fine at first but then I noticed the pull again after a few days. I had to get the front near side shock absorber replaced and took this to be the cause of the pulling, but now with the 1999 car which only has 35,000 miles which is amazing for an eleven yr old car, it is pulling to left as my older one did. Has anyone else noticed this tendancy in the Clio?????. Also I thought that my 1.4 was extremely economical but the 1.6 seems to consume a lot more petrol, which is awful for me because I am a mum and a student so money is tight at the best of times.
Submitted: 2010-07-11 | ID: 5629 | 3/10
![]()
We owned a 98 1.9 dti Scenic. We had 5 years trouble free motoring including 2 1200 mile tours ’round Ireland. Fantastic, comfy, reliable car and spent very little on it. She was getting a bit rusty round the arches and door bottoms so we decided to replace with a newer Scenic a 1.9 dci 52 reg. What pile of p***! After three times of snapping the fan belt and tangling into the timing belt causing extensive damage costing hundreds each time it had to go. The final straw was a broken wire, which fed the ECU immoblised the car and wiped out the diagnostics. I know a very good auto spark who sorted the problem so we could get shut (Digbys, Heywood, Lancs), so the car was sold at a huge loss. We then bought a low milage Vauxhall Meriva 1.7 cdti, nice little car, reliable, nippy but awful to drive any distance, rattly, tinny, very basic but served a purpose. A friend of mine recently bought a Grand Scenic and after a quick go was hooked again and so I pursued my interest and traded in the Meriva for a 1.5 dci Scenic. I do hope I’ve made the right choice ’cos it’s great to drive and looks superp and my wife loves it. By the way, the first Scenic we had is still on the road, looking a bit more tired but as far as I’m aware totally reliable!!
Submitted: 2010-07-09 | ID: 5624 | 5/10
![]()
Hi, I purchased the above vehicle 3 months ago and love the car, (haven’t gone through winter yet so don’t know if it will leak). My car is fitted with an ESP braking system but when turning the ignition on and pulling away at slow speed I hear a knocking noise which stops when you have accelarated more. I have taken it back to Renault after many excuses they could not find the fault, they inturn brought a Renault Technician down from London who told us it was something that this particular model does, it is the computer testing the system. Is there anybody out there who has encountered this problem? I cannot believe this is a standard thing.
Responses to this review
Yes this is a completely normal operation. It is actually the ABS pump testing. Nothing to worry about at all - the hatch versions do it as well. Happens at about 6mph - M W from New Zealand
Hola, I too notice this on my Feb 07 cc. Car has 45,000 kms and is going perfectly, recently serviced and everyting is fine... But I notice when moving after ignition a knocking noise. I haven’t reported it as it hasn’t caused any problems and stops after a couple of seconds. This did not happen on my previous 05 cc - Al Ocos from Spain
Hi there, I have a 2005 model and I hear the exact same noise, when pulling off slowly, taking off from traffic lights, turning corners etc. It sounds like there is a big metal box bashing against something, it can be quite loud and embarrassing. I can’t belive that this is normal. I am devastated! - Kerry O Connor from Cheshire
Mine does the same. They told me it was anti-hijack, it’s goin back next week cause it still does it - Natalie Cole from England
Submitted: 2010-07-08 | ID: 5611 | 5/10
![]()
I had the leaking problem but then I realised that I’m not closing the roof properly, I should never stop before I hear the peep and now, no leaking at all.
Submitted: 2010-07-06 | ID: 5591 | 4/10
![]()
My 2005 modus 1.4 dynamique has had 1 coil replaced at 3 years old with 18000 on the clock then at 4 years old and 22000 miles mine also suddenly developed a steering fault out of the blue. The column was sent off for repair but 10 months later it has gone again at 25000 miles. I face a huge bill when it goes into the main dealers for investigation and I will not be keeping it after. I am very disappointed with the Renault make.
Responses to this review
Exactly the same has happened to us. We had coils replaced last year and now have a steering fault that will probably cost us an arm and a leg. I would love to know how your problem solved itself - we will find out next week how much the dealer will rip us off for! - Paul Tyack from Hampshire
Can I just ask, did anybody manage to resolve their steering problem with the Renault Modus? My power steering has gone and the diagnostics say it is the ECU that has failed. I can’t afford a new part from Renault. Does anybody know anywhere where column can be sent for repair? Thanks - Debbie Brown from Yorkshire
Submitted: 2010-07-06 | ID: 5590 | 2/10
![]()
Same here as a lot of you, love the car, bought it from new, nothing but problems with leaks. Now the roof mechanism has some fault, which we don’t know what it is yet. More money, I’ll never buy a Renault again.
Submitted: 2010-07-03 | ID: 5557 | 2/10
![]()
I bought one of these 10 years ago and it is still running. I have had full service oil service each year and new alternator fitted apart from that its been perfect and a joy to driver. You get what you pay for, the interior is simple and can get tatty after prolonged use but it’s worth changing to leather by a trade specialist. Beware of overheating problem when buying used Renault Master Minibuses.
Submitted: 2010-07-01 | ID: 5553 | 3/10
![]()
Had this car 2 years, problem after problem; boot wouldn’t shut and lock(electrical),steering lock wouldn’t come off (electrical), window regulater broke costing £160 from Renault and now the electronic handbrake is coming up as a fault on the dash costing £385 +vat from Renault. So if you’re thinking of having one be prepared. Can’t fault the engine (1.9dci), goes like stink, we pull a trailer with all the camping gear in it and a car full of kids and the missus and it never struggles. The interior is fantastic, soft, comfy seats, plenty of room under floor storage, cuby holes, sliding centre console, air con, cruise control, it’s got the lot. Economical; we can get 60 to the gallon on a run (and I don’t drive like a vicar). So all in all a great car, just be warned it might cost you your hard earned cash to keep it going.
Submitted: 2010-07-01 | ID: 5542 | 4/10
![]()
Bought from Motorpoint in Peterborough for 13k new. Had a good time whilst I owned it and yes, I had leaks but not too bad. I agree not really good enough from a major manufacturer! My main gripe was how easy the doors and bodywork dented in the car park - really irritating and looked so bad. Traded it in for a 318i M-Sport convertible in Dec 09 got hit hard in depreciation. BMW wonderful build quality but I like the look of the new CC.
Submitted: 2010-06-29 | ID: 5537 | 4/10
![]()
I just bought this car 2.5 months ago. I loved the look of the car and immediately took my Suzuki Swift to trade for this car of my dreams. The car has been going great, bought from Arnold Clark Renault Dealer in Bishopbriggs scotland. As usual all good at time of sale but at the weekend I had to call the AA twice for a faulty alternator in the car. The first to be followed home from work and then have the car battery recharged using the AA van, and secondly on my way to the dealer to book my car in when smoke started belching from the engine. On further inspection it turns out that it’s the belt on the alternator that is wrecked and I will have to wait until tomorrow to get my car back, which is now not brand new according to me. The aftersales care was terrible and I had to call 4 times in order to find out what was actually wrong with the car. 4 days no car, no courtesy car and not even offered any compensation. Was offered a 24 hire car which is the standard from Renault but you do not get an extension on this. Currently paying for taxis to and from work and waiting time calling them. This is a real shame as I love the car. Has anyone else had a similar problem with their coupe or even a similar problem with the dealer??? I feel like they are not interested now that the car is sold :-(
Submitted: 2010-06-28 | ID: 5535 | 3/10
![]()
Must have been a Friday afternoon special, did not go properly since the day I bought this thing and just wished someone would steal and torch it.
Submitted: 2010-06-28 | ID: 5529 | 1/10
![]()
I have a 2007 Renualt Scenic and have had to replace all of the window motors, the keys and heater, these appear to be very common faults so how can Renault not accept these parts are substandard and replace at no cost to their customers?
Responses to this review
Oh my god, that is just what has happened with mine. I’m gutted. What a rip off. Renault need to take ownership of this fault. It is so wrong! Irene Alford from United Arab Emirates
I have to agree recently had heaters looked at the guy at the garage said he didn’t know how I hadn’t gone up in flames as the wires were so badly melted! Only 7 months ago had to have disks and pads on brakes replaced at a cost of £520 (total) just to get it through MOT. Got it booked in for recall upgrade to handbrake but have read Renault try to charge you for fixing as they say problems with handbrake/computer box are not the reason for the recall. I have a disabled Son and live in a rural area. I need my car for hospital appointments and simply can not afford to keep shelling out for this car but I have 3 years left on finance with a non Renault dealer... What the hell am I supposed to do? Jakki Blueitt from Durham
Submitted: 2010-06-24 | ID: 5510 | 1/10
![]()
I am a courier driver, I did 212,000 miles in 3 years and I never laid a spanner on this van apart from new front pads and disks and of course servicing. Even the rear shoes were original when I sold the van...truly magnificent van.
Submitted: 2010-06-21 | ID: 5490 | 5/10
![]()
When my twins were due I had a good look at what car to purchase and always having had Renault cars I decided to purchase the New Megan Sport Tourer and decided to go for the privilege and add leather and sunroof. Following issues with the launch Renault could not go ahead with the sun roof; well that should have been the sign!!. I have now had 6 years of hell with the car following major electric problems (door locks not working, windows working on their own, back window washer not working.) I then had a water punp blow up!! Two weeks later I got the car back (still with major electrical problems) Last year the gear box went!! Another £2K later and I think I have rebuilt the car. I can not lock the car most days and if I do I cannot get the thing open again and to top it all Renault have not been interested in my comments from day 1. I will never look at purchasing a Renault again.
Submitted: 2010-06-21 | ID: 5485 | 1/10
![]()
My renault kangoo makes a knocking noise as I start to go up a hill, otherwise it runs ok.
Submitted: 2010-06-20 | ID: 5483 | 2/10
![]()
Have had this car for 3 years now. My husband has mobility problems and needed a comfortable ride car. This we have, he is able to get in and out of the front seat with ease at 6ft 3 and of large frame. The front seats are very soft and comfortable. We have a diesel engine 1.6 and have never had any problems with speed. This car pulls well. As for the middle seats that people have said are heavy to take out, I must say that I can take them out very easily and they are very easy to put back in unlike the seats in our C Max that we had before. Fuel economy is good on a long journey have been able to get 60mpg and average around 42/45. My only gripe, we love our music and the quality of the radio/cd player is terrible. The two back seats are only suitable for children but fold flat into the boot area easily.
Submitted: 2010-06-20 | ID: 5477 | 4/10
![]()
At two and a half years old and 70,000 miles the cam chain stretched and took two teeth off the bottom gear cog. After taking it into my local Renault dealer believing it to be still under warranty, only to be told no because it was over 60,000 miles. They then charged me £119 for doing a diagnostic check to tell me something I already knew and for them to repair it would be just under £1900. Needless to say I had it done elsewhere at just over half the price, I did eventually get a phone call from Renault saying they would help me with the bill but after three letters to them and submiting the receipts for repairs, after about a month I still haven’t heard from them. To make things worse I now have a worn out flow meter, another £200. Contracts permitting, I might be looking to buy a new vehicle. Will I be buying Renault? I was considering the Master minibus but now possibly not...
Responses to this review
I understood the Renault Warranty period was 3 years or 100k whichever came soonest. My 58 Sport certainly has that - Steve from England
I am a taxi drive in gateshead, I know of three chains snapping ’round about 110k. All I can say is get it changed - Ian Robson
Submitted: 2010-06-17 | ID: 5462 | 2/10
![]()
I have an 02 van and its been a pain since I got it 4 yrs ago. It has been looked after well and serviced regularly with only 90k on the clock. When it’s good, it’s a pleasure to drive and if the reliability was better it would be hard to beat for style, comfort and handling. BUT all is not well with these vans. It suddenly decides to 20 mph whenever it wants. I have to turn off the ignition and back on to reset it. I was told the van was going in to limp mode because of a fault, yet no fault was found. The trouble was with faulty glow plugs and several other small faults. Then on a drive from Northampton to the Wirral (approx 1 hundred miles), fluids all checked befor start, and the engine blew. Ran out of oil. Engines for every vehicle from £350 to £650, for these vans they are £850 to £2000. Anyway, we had a totally rebuilt engine fitted and guess what!! It will not start!! Never again.
Responses to this review
The random limp mode problem and loss of power is likely to be the EGR valve needing a clean. I have had several DCI vans and this problem has occured on all of them - Martin Pladdys from Oxfordshire
Submitted: 2010-06-17 | ID: 5457 | 3/10
![]()
Great van at first. Seat belts stop retracting after 2 years, drivers window so stiff won’t open, keeps snapping the winder handle, and the best is the van starts first time every time, great eh? But I have no power when I depress the accelerator, the van will not move for thirty seconds after starting; I must be honest it only occurs on the first start of the day and it makes no difference what the weather is. I gave it to a main dealer and they had it for 7 weeks, the 1st said it was a computure glitch and reprogrammed the computor but that didn’t work then said it was the injector, sent 3 of them away for testing and came back ok, then said it was the 4th injector the one that doesn’t come out and they would have to remove the head and send it away to have the injector removed. They then informed me that the injector would need replacing as they don’t come out intact, cost approx £1000, told them they don’t know what they are doing and to rebuild the engine and return it to me broken . It’s still the same but it works, sort of.
Responses to this review
Glow plugs mate - Van Man 24/7 from England
Submitted: 2010-06-15 | ID: 5451 | 3/10
![]()
Well I have changed my mind about my Renault Modus. Back in 2008 I gave a report about the car. I said it was bad on rear tyres. I found cheap tyres on the net and doubled the mileage. The car has now done 140,000 miles and I am totaly besoted, and it definitley loves me back. I said in the last report that I would never buy another. I may not have to, the way this little car is driving I see it out living me. It is totally imaculate and could be taken for a two year old. Brilliant.
Responses to this review
What tyres do you use? Tony Wright from Cornwall
Submitted: 2010-06-14 | ID: 5447 | 5/10
![]()
Have had quite a few problems with this car that I bought brand new. The driver and passinger windows went, head gasket went, pistons had to be changed a few times. But the worst thing to finish it off is the timing belt snapped and caused extensive damage to pistons and valves so I think this is the end of my car having been quoted 2,500 to repair. I cannot understand that this has happened as it is recomended to change after 72,000 kilometers or 5 years. Any comeback from Renault?
Submitted: 2010-06-08 | ID: 5404 | 1/10
![]()
1 star is 1 too many. Had every ’typical Megane’ fault there is. ECU was fried as rain water runs straight over the top of it. (apparently it doesn’t rain in France!) Amazingly, Renault’s solution to this is to put the plastic bag that the new ECU comes in, over the top of it to keep it dry!! Thermostat leaked, therefore engine severely overheated. I should mention, not a single warning light came on! Timing belt is fantastically difficult to change. Drive belt tensioner does not tension, leading to a very very annoying screaching noise when driving at times. Nuts and bolts crumble easily when carrying out work (including the wheel nuts!!) Drivers window does not work (again, doesn’t seem to rain in France!). Endless faults with the injection system which even renault cannot identify! All and all a terribly manufactured car. DO NOT BUY THIS CAR!!!!!
Submitted: 2010-06-08 | ID: 5401 | 1/10
![]()
Brill car, I have had many Renaults over the years (16) and this is the best. I agree with all that has been said above.
Submitted: 2010-06-07 | ID: 5387 | 5/10
![]()
Had a scenic 1.6 expression 2001, what a nice family car, all was well but then the driver’s side window packed up. People do say about these electrical problems and the cost they bring to the Renault owners but they seem to be going to Renault main dealers to get repaired. We had a lot of problems with our 1.6 petrol engine with the coil packs blowing and Renault quoted £140 per pack to be repaired, I got each coil pack for about 8 quid on ebay and fitted them myself. I think people have problems with these cars and feel the need to express their anger so put feeds on sites like this but the reality is that the happy drivers are too busy driving their family around on days out to spend time typeing and complaining!!! We are getting an 04 1.9 dci tomorow, no coil packs!!! Maybe I will be made to eat my words?? I would never take any car to a main dealer, buy a Haynes manual and have a crack yourself, if electrical probs go to a local auto electrician.
Responses to this review
Hi, I have been told to scrap my Renault Scenic Grand 2005. After being serviced I had an oil leak, now the engine needs replacing. Please give info on how you went about selling parts; I have 4 new tyres etc., many thanks email julieayanna@yahoo.com - Julie Walsh-Cowie from England
Submitted: 2010-06-05 | ID: 5374 | 5/10
![]()
Bought the car four and a half years ago and have been genarally happy with it, though I do seem to have to replace the tyres often. It’s been all round the UK, through France a couple of times and it has served us well; so much so that we were considering buying the new one this year. We also had a small leak in the roof which we’ve learned to live with, thankfully it’s not a major problem. Sadly the roof stopped working last week and it’s going to cost over £1100 to put right (the part of the engine seized that controls this?). As this seems such an integral part of the car I wouldn’t have expected this to go so soon and am really annoyed. Has anyone else had this problem?
Responses to this review
Mine is 2004, also stopped working when halfway. Took to Renault who confirmed it is sensor and roof latch. Purchased parts from Renault £132.00 and independant garage are repairing for less than £50.00. The sensor is just behind the roof latch. The dealer always charges a lot more for repairs. Hope this helps - Maria from England
The roof on my Megane Hardtop stopped working as well, but on checking I noticed that the boot seemed to be lifting at one side, which meant that the lock was not operational on the near side. Local garage fixed it for £120, so double check that you are being quoted the right price. As for the top leaking, this seems to be standard on all hardtops. If you park the car "Nose up" the weight of the hardtop pulls it away from the windscreen. If you park it "Tail up" or on the level there shouldn’t be any problems - Ian Macpherson from Scotland
I have an 05 version and it has leaked from all windows/roof from day 1. It has been in and out of the garage where it came from and each time I collected it I was told the leaks were fixed. On the last occasion we were told the seals need changing and after many calls to Renault and Which, Renault agreed to pay half the cost, the garage a quarter and we picked up the last quarter. The seals have beens changed and (touch wood) it seems OK! I have been really happy with the car drive wise and reluctantly I am having to trade it in as I have had back surgery and I can’t get easily in and out of it anymore, or reach back for the seatbelt. I wish I had known that there were water ingresse problems with other cars rather than just mine 3 years ago, as it would have gone back straight away and I would have demanded my money back as the car was ’not fit for purpose’ - Sue from Surrey
Submitted: 2010-06-04 | ID: 5355 | 3/10
![]()
I own 2X 2005 Megane CC’s and I think that the Megane CC is a great car. The only problem I have had with mine, after doing 80000 KM, is the altenator. I service the car at Renault every 15000 KM and do an oil change myself every 7500 KM. The only problem mine has is a an occasional ’judder’ when pulling away (obviously pressure plate is a bit worn). I really enjoy my Megane and both of them have absolutely no roof leaks.
Submitted: 2010-06-04 | ID: 5354 | 5/10
![]()
After a series of French cars, most lately a Citroen C5 hatch, we’ve returned to Renault and an estate. To be honest, I might have bought another C5 if it still existed as a hatch but I needed room to store my bike internally and the C5 has become a much bigger car overall. The Megane gives me the storage versatility I need but with excellent economy and tax figures. The ride is clearly firmer than the old car but comfortably so and it hugs the road well with virtually no body sway. I would describe the engine as ’free running’; lively and responsive without any need to force the pace (I drive conservatively). I thought the 6 gears would take some getting used to but that hasn’t been any problem; 5th will pull sensibly at 35mph and above in normal traffic flows. Having the extra gear helps in the efficiency stakes too. Storage is good and I don’t have any real problem with a partly non-horizontal floor. The one thing I dislike, and the reason for only 4 stars, is that the rear windows, back and side, give a quite restricted view particularly when reversing - I think the previous model had a more sensible rear design, albeit without the sexy light cluster. But all in all an excellent manoeuvrable vehicle which is returning 54mpg.
Submitted: 2010-06-01 | ID: 5345 | 4/10
![]()
I bought this car second hand in March 2009, with a low mileage for a 3yr old car (just 9,000). However, I soon noticed the leaky roof as soon as winter came round. To be honest, it doesn’t bother me too much at the moment as its only a small amount of water getting in on the passenger side and since I thoroughly enjoy driving the car, I’m putting up with it, for now anyway. The main concern I have is yesterday whilst braking (fairly gently) I heard a scraping/grinding noise and saw that on the display panel ’Braking Fault’ appeared. I’ve never seen this before and panicked. I was quite close to home so continued driving but it didn’t happen again. Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone know what I can do, other than spending a fortune taking it into a Renault Dealer only to be told that "its just something the Renault Megane does every once in a while and we can’t repair it"?
Responses to this review
Sounds like brake pads may be wearing out. go to a small garage get it checked should be a cheap job - Paul Whibley from England
Had same problem took car to garage comp picked up no problems, turned out to be faulty wire, £20 to sort - Peter from Durham
Submitted: 2010-05-30 | ID: 5333 | 4/10
![]()
Just recently purchased my vehicle so my first impressions so far are that it is very comfortable to drive all controls light and easy to use feeling of quality. Very stylish and good boot space for a coupe, good in car acceleration through all gears except 1st gear which is slow. I bought the car from Renault, Orpinton who I found very helpful and knowledgable.
Submitted: 2010-05-30 | ID: 5328 | 4/10
![]()
Sold my Micra so I could carry grandkids around, only since owning the Scenic for only 8 months, electric windows packed up, twice leaked at oil sump, central locking locked me out of car. RAC took me to Renault garage where I was quoted to get all repairs done,around £1.400 so brought it home and sold it as spares or repairs at a BIG loss. I now own a micra again and like the last Micra no trouble at all.
Responses to this review
Hi, sorry to hear about your problems with your Scenic. Have had grand scenic since 2004 (bought new) and after several things going wrong - fuel pump, heater, electric windows now the big end has gone and needs a new engine! Dealer says it’s one of those things and worth scrap value. You mention that you sold your car for parts - how did you do this - the very least I have 4 Michelin tyres to sell. Would appreciate any advice on selling as spares, many thanks, David from Hertfordshire
Submitted: 2010-05-28 | ID: 5320 | 1/10
![]()
Been to see the car, fell in love with the car, 6th gear a little nerve racking ’til you get use to it. Stylish, handles well at speed, which is quickly arrived at with the turbo :) Ordered the car back in April, dealership told me 8 weeks now it’s going to be July, not very happy. Why the delay? He told me they had to be built! Didn’t know Renault were hand crafted for each and every owner. Getting really fed up now of waiting, only seen a couple so far about, WANT MINE !!!!!!
Responses to this review
Hi Lydia Ordered mine on the 03/03/2010 was told it would be about 17 days before it arrived at the dealer ship wasnt able to pick it up until the 04/05/2010 but well worth the wait. What a superb car done nearly 7000 miles and it has to be the best car I have ever owned. Averages over well over 50 mpg and effortless to drive. I would recommend the 1.5 Dynamique Tom Tom as a first class car - Rob Smith from Derbyshire
Submitted: 2010-05-26 | ID: 5303 | 4/10
![]()
It’s as simple as this! If you have ANY sort of sense you would avoid all Renaults (especially Meganes) like the plague, they are all SCRAP! Worst cars I’ve ever owned and I’ve owned Protons, Peugeots and Citroens. The other two French car manufactuers are good but Renault are pure dung.
Responses to this review
Hi, I guess anyone can have bad experiences but all I can say is that I had a Renault Clio 1.6 16v for 9 years without any problems apart from usual wear and tear. I loved it. After 95k I bought a Toyota which had problems so I traded in for another Toyota which had so many problems I cannot list them here. The clio seems to get far better comments than most cars on this website and driving enthusiasts love them. I cannot speak for the Megane or Laguna but I think your comment about clios is very inaccurate - Peter from Bedfordshire
Simon, you just named that tune in one. In a nutshell, Renault is a rubbish car we had an experience with two and never again. For all the fools who are under the illusion that Renault is a good car because their family or in-laws work for Renault need to get their silly heads examined - Justin Harrison from Wales
I have to agree with you Simon, this Clio is the worst car I have ever had, it has cost me a fortune despite being only 4 years old with a low mileage. I have just been quoted £336 + vat for a light pack, probably mostly labour? The problem: the lights were coming on & off on their own and the wipers stopping whenever, I was driving in the rain & overtaking what they just stopped, very scary! They are known for electrical faults apparently, I won’t be looking at any more Renaults - Elsie Bishop from Scotland
Submitted: 2010-05-25 | ID: 5293 | 1/10
![]()
My wife leases the car from motobility, it is ideal for carring her folding wheel chair, bags of room for shopping. The acceleration is tremendous for such a small engine, twice it has got me out of trouble with idiots coming out of drive ways. I am 6ft 2ins tall and find the driving position better than some bigger cars. At 77yrs young I class this among the best I have driven.
Submitted: 2010-05-24 | ID: 5290 | 5/10
![]()
My daughter bought for me a second hand Kangoo van a few years ago. It has been marvellous. A hard working economicai and efficient machine. Last October I lost the ignition key, the only one. I know, I won’t do that again. My local Renault main dealer (Benissa, Alicante) took the van to their workshops and 3 months later sold me two new keys for 1,200 euros. Is this normal? I feel ripped off.
Submitted: 2010-05-24 | ID: 5288 | 5/10
![]()
Bought my Modus in May 2008 when it was 3 years old. A year later all the coils went, 2 at a time so numerous trips to garage. Now the power steering and column costing £990 has gone, no warnings or problems just stopped and of course only the Renault dealership can sort the problem! It’s only done 30,000 miles and all the Renault dealership said well it is 5 years old! I bought it at 3 years old they didn’t say in the sales pitch it will conk out after 2 years of having it. My husband’s Honda Civic is 10 years old and never had a problem. I didn’t have a problem with my Corsa until 9 years old and 60,000 miles! Never again!
Responses to this review
We have a 54 plate 1.5 dci Modus. Two electric window have had to be replaced, the road spring has failed on right rear and now had to pay £1,250 for a power steering column replacement. Nice to drive but typically French reliability and build i.e. not good - Anthony Holingsworth from Hampshire
Submitted: 2010-05-21 | ID: 5273 | 2/10
![]()
I leased mine for two years and it was perfect. No leaks, no problems. As soon as it got to 15 degrees the roof came down. I am about to get a new lease car and it will be a Megane CC.
Submitted: 2010-05-21 | ID: 5266 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had my van 5 1/2 years from New, November 57 plate, renewed oil after first 6 months then every 9 months after that all its service life added fuel injector cleaner every year. Apart from blocking windscreen washers and a hand brake cable sieze recently the van has been faultless. Apart from air con has discharged though, and has a leak in its system. I would buy another, mine is still on its original clutch at 110,000 mile and front discs lasted 76.000 miles, rears went at 35,000? Look after the engine with regular oil changes and it won’t bite you later on in life.
Responses to this review
All I can say is lucky you. Me a 58 plate 4 slave cylinders and clutches, 1 injector seized through corrosion. Seat knacked just at 40,000 miles, ohhh 1 month back and we’re on number 5 slave cylinder and probably the other 3 injectors. Have you had the modification to stop rain water leaking onto your injectors? If not, you’re gonna have fun. Mine has been serviced every 18,000 miles by main dealer and cost me a fortune. It has been broken 12 weeks out of 20-ish months. I am just unlucky - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-05-16 | ID: 5227 | 5/10
![]()
Bought the car in 2008 with 60000 miles. It now has 97000 and it hasn’t missed a beat - no niggles, no rattles. This my second Scenic and I’m about to buy Renault yet again. Only money spent was timing belt, new tyres and new brakes all round. It leaks a little power-steering fluid, and a little oil, but I have given this car no care and have happily thrashed the engine - it is a real worker. The car has never been amazing on MPG, returning around 43mpg around town and only rising slightly to about 45mpg on longer runs. It drives well and happily eats up motorway miles well in excess of the legal limit - no matter how hard you push the engine it still returns 45mpg on long journeys - not bad for an 8 year old car with fast approaching 100000miles on the clock!
Submitted: 2010-05-13 | ID: 5210 | 5/10
![]()
I have a 55 plate Trafic. I came out to it the other day after work and started to pull away and it juddered like crazy. I went into it today and the clutch was on the floor so I bled the clutch and it seems fine but after hearing the stories on master and slaves failing I have a funny feeling I’m in for a shock bill. Won’t buy again, should have stayed with my Transit.
Responses to this review
My 05 Trafic has exactly the same problem. Clutch pedal flat on the floor. Slave cylinder gone apparantly, which has contaminated the clutch lining. Just been told by my garage (Not dealership) that its gonna cost me £820 - Colin Regan from Somerset
My clutch pedal went to the floor last month. I also took it to my usual local garage and they changed the slave cylinder for £280 all inclusive. Put it up on ramps, removed driveshaft(s) split gear box from engine and angled it just enough to get the new part in. In and out in a day. I know things are more expensive down south but that sounds more like main dealer prices - Peter B from Durham
I have tried to drive away in my 54 plate Trafic this morning and when I pulled away, the clutch went to the floor. After being towed to my local garage, a mechanic said he thought it was the slave and clutch and quoted me £300-£350.
I bought the van from an auction around two years ago with the gearbox knackered and this cost me £500 to fix but it was still a bargain all-in-all.
Despite this, the van is great to drive and served me well over the time. It has 77,000 on the clock and is overdue to a timing belt and for a service.
So I will have to take a hit in the pocket but hopefully this will be the last for a while - Bobby from Lanarkshire
Submitted: 2010-05-09 | ID: 5182 | 2/10
![]()
I bought this car Feb, 2009. I absolutely love it! Drives like a dream and looks fantastic!!
Submitted: 2010-05-04 | ID: 5154 | 5/10
![]()
I purchased this car from new ordering an automatic gearbox due to back operations. It died on me going up a hill in the middle of nowhere after just two weeks. RAC told me to go back to Renault dealer as I needed a complete new coil pack, since then this has happened again and again. Waited three months for a windscreen motor part, from December until March. Apparently the original motor wasn’t up to the job in the first place so all spares were re-called and Renault had to go back to the drawing board. And yes my roof leaks rear left side, massive gap – can’t be bothered any longer :(
Submitted: 2010-05-04 | ID: 5148 | 1/10
![]()
This has got to be the worst minibus I’ve ever driven, I have had nothing but trouble and has been in and out of Renault at least 10 times in the year I have owned it, so here goes! 1). The seat belts in the rear are a nightmare, when people get out of the rear seats they get them trapped in the door which in turn makes the sliding door bend out of shape, which is un-repairable and not covered by warranty. 2). It has done 30000 and has had the following done to it: New Turbo, New Computer, Oil fumes into cabin, new battery, New rubber seals replaced on doors. 3). It has now developed clutch judder and so I’m gearing myself up for a new clutch and gearbox. 4). Air con is not standard in the rear seats on the sport and costs over £1000 as an extra. No cruise control, no storage place for maps etc, access to rear seats very complicated. The good points: The Sport looks great, all panels colour coded, MPG 35 combined, The ride is superb it’s just like driving a car, The LWB is the best as it has a massive boot. And finally, the wind noise above 60mph is a common fault and is just unbearable at 70 mph with whistles coming from door and windscreen seals. Do not buy this CPV as a taxi, I wish I’d brought the VW Transporter or the Vito.
Responses to this review
I own a 08 Trafic MPV, used as a taxi. Re: air con fault; The 07 Trafic was recalled buy Renault because a pipe was weak and moved with the engine causing it to snap, this would in turn let the gas escape so the air con would not work. My friend has two 07 reg, which have both been fixed. My Trafic has covered 10600 miles and is out of warranty now. My local dealer would do nothing to help, I went to Renault complaints and they are agreed to 25% reduction in the repair bill. Off to Renault we went and on inspection they found that the pipe had snapped. I asked if this was the same as the recall on the 07reg and it would seem to be the same. Back to renault complaints! They didn’t want to admit to it so it has cost me an £370.00 aircon fix. Beware a 08reg trafic has the same airncon as the 07reg, your aircon will fail sooner or later! - Tom White from Dorset
Submitted: 2010-05-02 | ID: 5136 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car at 2 years old and with 9000 miles on the clock. I had an extra six months warranty on top of the standard 3 yrs from the garage and then (thank goodness) paid £585 for a further 3 year Motorplan warranty. Engine wise has been completely reliable, and love the car itself, but electricals have been a nightmare. Both front electric window regulators have gone at different times with the windows being stuck open (would have cost £275 each without warranty), the keyless unlocking has gone at different times on ALL of the four doors and, in fact, one of them has gone again. Without the warranty, these cost £100 each to repair. Warranty won’t pay for the 2nd time on same door. Both electric wing mirrors have packed up at separate times. As soon as the warranty expires, the car is GOING!
Submitted: 2010-04-28 | ID: 5121 | 3/10
![]()
Hi, Having read other bad reviews on the Scenic I would like to let everyone know my death defying experiences since I bought it 5 months ago. 3 Times on the motorway in the fast lane CHECK EMMISSIONS came up the dash board with a loud Bang. No power and all controls lost their use. Took it into Renault who test drove it and said yes it is the computer.They changed it and mended the window which stopped working. Yesterday to my horror it happened again - in the fast lane of the M25! It is now in the garage, they are trying to find the fault. I have said I don’t want it back and I either have another car or my money back. Probably won’t ever look at a another Scenic. Traded my lovely Modus in for this pile of C***
Responses to this review
Probably packed up deliberately to stop you killing yourself while you were driving ’In the fast lane’ - R Marshall from Hampshire
Submitted: 2010-04-28 | ID: 5120 | 1/10
![]()
I love my car, only had it 2 weeks. At first a slight judder now it’s getting worse, only happens in first gear, gonna take it back again to dealer. Does anyone no why this car is juddering?
Responses to this review
Hi, the juddering is the pressure plate, depending on your mileage maybe you should consider changing the clutch kit. Mo harm can come from the juddering, I own a 2005 Megane CC 1.6 had it for about 2 and a half years now. It does the same thing sometimes but I still think it is a great car! Leeron Gordon from South Africa
Submitted: 2010-04-27 | ID: 5108 | 3/10
![]()
I had a 1.6 petrol automatic 99 V plate a few years back and it was a pile of c**p but picked up the 2002 1.9 dci fidji a couple of days ago and it’s fantastic. Sold my 2004 volvo s60 d5 because I needed to downsize and raise cash and even with the fairly big power difference the Scenic is certainly no slouch. I highly recommend this car for it storage capacity, it’s comfort, the awesome diesel engine, and thank god this one has air con and a cd player, oh and a manual gearbox because the auto is disasterous. love it.
Responses to this review
I’m the guy who wrote this review and unfortunately have to report that my brilliant diesel Scenic has kicked me full in the face. Only had it since April 2010 and already needed 2 fanbelts and 1 new alternator, now I have no compression and a price tag of around £500. That makes a total of £900 so far and it not worth much more than that now. Will not have another one - Dave Smith from Warwickshire
Submitted: 2010-04-26 | ID: 5102 | 5/10
![]()
Bought from new, I’ve just replaced new gearbox at 52000 miles. If I had known about these problems I would have never have bought it. Renault know about these problems but won’t rectify them.
Responses to this review
Can anyone tell me if Renault will pay for my bill to replace gearbox? I will write a letter soon to them to see what I can get - Rob Amato from England
Same fault on my 52 place 100dci, New box three years ago at 96000 miles and its just gone again at 113000, not a very happy chappy!!! Had it all done by Renault as well so will be kicking off tomorrow, surely you should get more than 17000 miles from a gear box!? - Carl Price from Leicestershire
I had my van from new 03... only just reached 45k and gearbox just gone. The approx estimate £800/2k to repair or replace... other faults glow plugs, air in take valve/ flow regulator... this van has been serviced by Renault 3 times in its life... feel like driving it through showroom window... oh that’s right, I can’t as it’s stuck on my drive... beware if your thinking of buying... total bag of s***e!!! Hate Renault from Staffordshire
Submitted: 2010-04-21 | ID: 5071 | 1/10
![]()
The engine response is fantastic. Surprising acceleration for that size of vehicle, even when loaded. Steering is very shurefooted in all conditions. I found driving this bus very comfortable and enjoyable even on long journeys. Good view allround thanks to well positioned driver’s seat (above passangers seats) mirrors and door windows. Lower based passanger platform provides extra headroom amd easier access. When cold the gear changes are a bit stiff but fine after few miles. Rear suspension could be softer for passangers comfort. Steering wheel size is more of a truck. No major mechanical or reliability issue after 80K. Good van.
Submitted: 2010-04-21 | ID: 5069 | 4/10
![]()
THE worst car I have ever owned. Bought second hand nearly 3 yrs old. Shortly after buying it the electric windows broke in the back, then the ones in the front went. We have a leak in the passenger footwell and have no idea where it is coming from. The coils have gone, the battery has gone 2x, the fan has broken only works on setting no.3, the handbrake only engages when the car is switched off. The dashboard has broken, oh and our most recent fault (today) the keys don’t work. Either of them. I have googled it and seems yet ANOTHER common fault with these cars. I have £2,500 left to pay on it yet we are getting rid of it as soon as possible, at a loss to us, what with the things we have paid to be fixed, the loan and now another car we will have to buy. Renault UK are useless when you go to them with complaints, obviously they see this all the time, yet as another person said they FIB (putting it VERY mildly) and told me to get most of my repairs done, just to make it driveable would cost over a £1000 - this is of course not including things like leaks, broken fans, and windows etc. I will NEVER buy another Renault so long as I live. FACT. Like others I will tell everyone I know not to purchase a Renault either!!!! Awful service, awful cars.
Submitted: 2010-04-21 | ID: 5065 | 1/10
![]()
This is the third Trafic I have had and the same problems still keep coming back; clutch judder, grinding brakes.The only good thing is it starts at 4.30 in the morning and 5 at night but will cost you over 70000 miles.
Submitted: 2010-04-20 | ID: 5060 | 1/10
![]()
Bought van December 2009, 100, 27 dci etc., 86,000 on the clock, just been mot’d in October 2009. Jan 2010 back off side caliper seized on, got one from breaker yard .com for 48 quid, have been advised by my mechanic to change nearside as well. Track rod ends replaced, ball joints need replacing, then BAM fuel pump died, cost a grand to sort, hazards packed up and hooter, gearbox leaking had the same thing really hard to get in all gears, topped up at the filler hole and it is now running super smooth, still seems to be leaking in couple of places though. I added some Wynn’s gearbox stop leak, maybe slowed a little but definitely not stopped. Sit at 75 to 80 on the motor way (if you are a traffic Policeman quickly run your eyes back and forth across the screen, that’s right you are feeling sleepy, sleepy, you read my speed as 70 mph and under) and returns between 35 an 40 to the gallon. Fab van when its running as it should, would corner the market if only it would keep running as it should.
Submitted: 2010-04-19 | ID: 5055 | 3/10
![]()
I bought a Trafic 115bhp on a 57 reg second hand on 60k and have done 20k in a year. My gear change has gone stiff 3 times so I can’t get it into gear unless forcing it. Mechanic says it’s some roller bearings on the top of the gearbox, which constantly need greasing and freeing off. Renault have done this twice under warranty then refused on the 3rd time. Now the engine warning light has come on and the van has started juddering like a miss fire. Took it to Renault who say it was a fault with the injectors getting water in and shorting out, which they said they had repaired, only to get it back and its still as bad but with no warning light on the dash and to top it off I had it back 3days and the gear change has gone stiff again. Can anybody help me? This is the worse car/van I have ever owned, never again will I buy a Renault.
Responses to this review
I have a Trafic with the same problem of water in the injectors. The work was done under warranty. I also have cltuch judder on first and reverse. Should I have this done under warranty? 57 plate with 61k on the clock - David Hedges from London
Submitted: 2010-04-17 | ID: 5042 | 1/10
![]()
I bought the new shape Laguna at a year old with 14K on the clock and quickly regretted it. It had constant small problems. Within the first 3 months, a seat back fell off, I was locked in, the windows mis-operated, the cruise control played up, the speedometer became erratic, the bonnet retainer fell off & the alarm failed. Throughout my time with the car it had a serious flat spot that the dealer was unable to fix. Also the suspension is seriously hard. You feel every imperfection in the road and it gets tiring after a while - you do not look forward to driving it. The only plus sides to the car were the interior - which is genuinely nice - and the engine (aside from the flat spot) which is very strong but still economical. To put things in perspective, after a year with the Laguna I traded it in for a Vectra 1.9 CDTI SRI and now actually enjoy driving again. The Vectra feels like a luxury car after driving the Laguna - and the electrics work.
Submitted: 2010-04-16 | ID: 5033 | 2/10
![]()
Similar van to the Vivaro, where do I start ... Electrics kept cutting out while driving along – it would just stop. I went into an auto electrician and fixed it for £200; they said a wire was tracking in the loom? OK for 600 miles then went out to it one afternoon and there was no central locking, no immobiliser and lamp flashing on the dash. I called AA, they couldn’t fix it. I started searching on the net - could it be the black box under dash? I took it out wiped the board inside and reconnected it. It started fine for a day then nothing again… I sent the box off for repair as I thought it may be faulty. It was sent back with no faults at all, put it back in and it started again no problem. OK for another day... then nothing again. So I decided to take out the ECU and maybe send off for check. So I took it out completely and put in the garage to pack for sending, went out to the van and guess what? The immobiliser light was flashing on the dash, put ECU back in and drove around the block, OK. Left the van for 3 days, just kept checking that light was flashing, went out to use it and light had stopped flashing of its own accord and nothing ... What next I ask?
Submitted: 2010-04-15 | ID: 5026 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my Clio recently, from a used car dealer with a good reputation; the car has only 1,500 miles in its history. It is an exceptional car, I have only one fault to mention, there is a squeal from the front off-side brake when I apply light pressure to the brake pedal and I have been back to the dealer twice and have been told that they have fitted new brake pads and the noise will eventually go. Can you support this or do you have a more logical reason for the noise? I’m hoping that you can help in this problem.
Responses to this review
I had new breaks fitted to a Fiesta and the noise lasted for about 8 months - Anita Evanson from England
Submitted: 2010-04-15 | ID: 5023 | 5/10
![]()
A good sized car but when things go wrong they’re a nightmare to put right. Biggest problem so far are the electric windows - so far 3 have failed, each having a mind of their own, appears that this is a very common problem. Spent 300 quid on replacing a motor in one of the doors and just yesterday, 2 other windows have since failed. Then there was the transmission failure…Very disappointed with everything Renault, but a valuable lesson learned - never be touching one again.
Submitted: 2010-04-15 | ID: 5009 | 1/10
![]()
I am just about to purchase a Megane CC even after looking at the Megane Coupe-Cabriolet reviews. I think I need to tell all of you that I had a 2005 Grand Scenic and whilst driving home from hospital with my wife in the passenger seat (on a breathing machine) there was an almighty bang and the whole glass roof shattered. This went everywhere and also cut my head. When I took it to Renault they said this was most unusual and couldn’t understand why it had happened. It seems to me now that Renault may be less than truthful to their customers. PS I still fancy the Megane CC, so i think I will only be able to use it on sunny days with the roof off!
Responses to this review
I own a Grand Scenic 2006 and this week, my sunroof did the same - like a firework right over our heads, all over myself and my toddler. All I can say is I am glad he was sleeping when it happened as he had shards of glass all over his face and God forbid it had gone in his eyes. I had a few cuts and grazes and shards of glass stuck in my hand.
The insurance company was a nightmare in figuring out how to deal with it and in response, Renault have had no knowledge of this ever happening before! There really should be something done about this, it is so dangerous. Even just a layer of plastic on the inside to protect us from the shattered glass may well have left me feeling not quite so frightened. Surely in a collision, this could quite literally be fatal - Kate Hudson from Worcestershire
Submitted: 2010-04-15 | ID: 5005 | 3/10
![]()
Such an appaling piece of S***E, So many things have went wrong with this car. The electrics have been very dodgy and the engine has been troublesome. After all the complaints I’ve heard about Lagunas I think Renault shouldn’t be allowed to sell them, and if they are gonna make such bad cars to offer at least 5years warranty. If Hyundai can do it why can’t Renault?
Responses to this review
Heh! Tell it like it is! Mal Greig from Scotland
Submitted: 2010-04-14 | ID: 4991 | 1/10
![]()
I recently purchased a 2006 Renault Megane CC (3 months ago), Two days after purchase the roof stopped working (2nd retraction) the garage has refused to cover the costs as they have said the roof is not under warranty. Anyway I have now purchased two wires that were thought to be the problem £50 each excluding fitting...but they both snapped due to pressure when opening the roof. Now they think its a little black latch that is not retracting correctly costing another £80. This also may not be the problem and if it doesn’t work renault have said it could cost in excess of £1000. Does anyone have any idea of the problem or encountered it themselves? Also, Alpino Cars Ltd of Manchester have been no help at all I am ringing citizens advice tomorrow as I only had it two days, surely they must be accountable for some costs incurred?
Responses to this review
Paul, hope you read this. Did you buy a 2.0 megane convertible from Alpino in manchester? Ive just bought the same model, may even be the same car from them. I’ve not experienced any problems with the roof but there is a grinding sort of noise when moving off in 1st and 2nd gear - Neil Chapman from England
Hi Paul, I just saw your post about having problems with H Alpino cars in Manchester and I also have problems with them. Please contact me at jason_a_kaye[at]hotmail[dot]com if you see this post. Cheers, Jason.
Submitted: 2010-04-12 | ID: 4984 | 5/10
![]()
I have been in the motor trade for 40 odd years . It was only when Mazda brought out the MX 5 that soft tops that were affordable stopped leaking. Rolls Royce made a soft top that was dry but the top hung over so far it looked like the car had gutters. If you were to attach wires from the foot wells to the back seat tops and tighten them then drive they would snap. Thats how much the shell moves. ONE ANSWER is to get the silicone grease used on plastic central heating pipe push fits from plum center etc Wipe this onto the seals from time to time and it makes a water tight seal. I use this on ocean going yacht windows to seal them and old classic soft tops. The problem will only be fixed when the Europeans have to compete with the Japanese. Clutch ’judder’ is just that. Since the asbestos and potash compound was removed from friction materials brakes have squeaked and clutches juddered. Have it changed and clean up the fly wheel face.
Submitted: 2010-04-11 | ID: 4978 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my Renault at 18 months old, it is my 2nd one because generally I love them. HOWEVER, having only done 30,000 miles I have had to replace two window electric motors in three last year costing me nearly £800. I agree with others about the expensive costs with dealers for work and parts and servicing, far too expensive! The window problem has put me off buying another Renault.
Submitted: 2010-04-10 | ID: 4962 | 4/10
![]()
Bought this car 2 weeks ago, so far it’s been in the garage more times than I’ve driven it. The usual problems; roof seal leaking, garage fitted new door hinges and replaced the door seal. So far it hasn’t cured the problem but they have it back to try again, it might be something I have to live with. I love everything else about the car, I might have to invest in a car cover. Roll on the summer.
Responses to this review
I have tried three times before to responed to this website but my comments about my leaking car (a 56 plate Megane CC purchased in Feb. 09) have yet to be included on this website. The car has spent most of the winter "being repaired" at Motorline in Ashford. After spending over £800 it still leaks even when washed, so now I have contacted the BBC Watchdog programme as Renault UK customer services say I have to accept these leaks, sorry "water ingress",however I believe that the car is "not fit for purpose"!!! - Annemarie bolt from Kent
Note: Annemarie’s previous comments can be found under Lisa Bamford from Kent’s review below.
I have the same problem with water leaks, Renaults are not admitting that they have a fault - Kim Watts from England
Submitted: 2010-04-10 | ID: 4956 | 3/10
![]()
Renault is back again with all new advanced model. It is pleasure driving Renault’s first 4wd suv which is more of luxury sport vehicle. I love Koleos (Koleos is name of european butterfly.) Thanks to mr. Carlos
Submitted: 2010-04-07 | ID: 4945 | 5/10
![]()
I have had the van from new. Had a few minor issues with it but I have found my Renault dealership (Bristol Street) excellent and would recommend them to anyone. Would definitely buy another one.
Submitted: 2010-04-03 | ID: 4930 | 4/10
![]()
Great car I just love it. Had trouble with air cond, which had a leak, now fixed, top of range auto plus all leather; I hate manuals all that clutch work. I would recommend this car to anyone.
Responses to this review
Hi, I have the same car. This is a factory special, I was told this car is not for me as I only do seven miles a day and this car was meant for hard motorway driving. I have to blast it down the motorway every month to get the soot out of the exhaust. No bother with roof leaking, don’t no how though as I brought the electric garage door down on it while my husband was putting it into garage. The back window won’t come up so hit it with a hammer, which worked for a short while but now it won’t go down; this a common fault in all Meganes. But I love the car this is my second one. The 05 I had was never out of the garage for roof leaks but this one is great. I will definitely buy another one in the future - Jan Shanks from Lanarkshire
Submitted: 2010-03-31 | ID: 4916 | 5/10
![]()
I have a renault trafic 1.9 07. Don’t buy one, the gear box is no good. My diff has gone at 71,000miles, the total cost of repairs are £2,800. I’ve had this van from new, it cost £14,000 what a waste of time. Renault will not do the repairs? IF YOU HAVE ONE GET RID BEFORE 70,000 MILES. WARNING DONT BUY RENAULT !!
Responses to this review
Can you tell me why Renault would not do the repairs? We have the same problem with our office van and our driver seems to have mislaid the booklets that came with the van about warranties etc. Again we had this van from new and it has done 75,000 and the gearbox has gone and Renault are saying they won’t do the repairs but I can’t check up on the warranty offered with the van in the first place - Helen Peperell from England
The trafic is front wheel drive on my 06 plate, there OK if you drive them properly, but having a diff, what age is it. The Trafic is half the price of a VW but just as good. I do airports with mine, it has covered just short of 200,000 miles, the only thing so far that I have had to replace is the airflow meter, £100 brand new, the Bridgstone tyres last for 67000 miles, discs for 90,000 miles. The only real bother has been wheel bearings but there only £100 for a pair and that includes the discs with the bearing already fitted in them. All in all I think there OK, the CD player packs in when heater gets to hot but I just put another CD in, rubber mats are not made for high heel shoes etc etc... I have a mate who has 300.000 miles on his, so if you use motorways a lot get one - Roy Hebblethwaite from Yorkshire
Submitted: 2010-03-24 | ID: 4869 | 1/10
![]()
Badly built, too much plastic inside, the air con is feeble, puny power to revs, engine brakes wear too quick, service too expensive, wipers c**p and hard to change a bulb on lights. Compared to a Focus the Megane is poor for a dynamic model and lacks road poise. Feels like a Fiesta engine in an estate body. The engine is so weak, I expected at least 13O bhp in a tourer with duel air con. I will be parting with my estate as soon as I can. I’m going back to Land Rovers, at least they’ve got proper power plants that are easy to tune and manage.
Responses to this review
I could not agree more. Do not buy!!! Lyn Arthur from England
Submitted: 2010-03-20 | ID: 4851 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my Grand Modus less than 2 years ago and the clutch started slipping and then went bang; I have only done 17000 miles. I have had 10 new cars previously and not one have them has had a burnt out clutch, in fact my son has one of them which has now done 80000 miles and still has not had a new clutch. Renault have said it is my fault and it has cost me £1262.17 and they say they are not going to pay.
Submitted: 2010-03-17 | ID: 4839 | 5/10
![]()
The van has a very good driving position and height. Good level of equipment, however, the electrics have been bothersome and power levels are only good if driving on turbo, which then drinks fuel. Would I get another one? No. Get a Mercedes Vito instead.
Responses to this review
My mate’s Vito (£28,000 new 5 years ago) is plagued with rust, he says he would never get another. Compared to my ’58 Trafic, it is a rust bucket, be warned! - Steve from England
Submitted: 2010-03-15 | ID: 4824 | 2/10
![]()
I have had the van two years. It’s in good condition and had 47k on the clock when I got it, liked the looks and it drove well, comfy etc. Two turbo boost sensors and an air mass meter went within the first six months. In the Renault garage, out of the Renault garage etc, etc. Thought fair enough, it is second hand. Then the van decided it didn’t want to rev past 1500 revs and went into "limp mode" (?) and then worked and then it didn’t etc, etc. AA followed me to a garage. Garage couldnt find the fault back to renault. More money for the fancy computer test. "It’s the EGR valve", "it’s the Air mass meter", its this - change bits put the original bit back on, blah, blah. No-one seemed to know what it was, which is worrying since they build them. Got the van back, took it up the road, still doing the same thing so straight back in the garage - this time they changed some vacuum pump to do with the turbo as it had blocked up (?) anyway seemed to clear the fault, until it rained. Faults back again. For f**** sake! Told Renault that this fault seems worse during or after a downpour, it doesn’t do it when the weather is dry. They said it was coincidence and told me they changed the engine oil as they said it was too thick and blocking up the Vacuum pump pipes, £100 + notes. Could it be a leaky filler cap; there is water on top of the engine after heavy rain or maybe water running into a sensor causing a short? Does seem odd that its worse after rain? They didnt want to know, what kind of service is that at £75 an hour? Now there is a buzzing noise then from the top of the engine when I turn off the ignition. Doesn’t do it all the time. Anyone got any ideas? PS. Renault had their top mechanic on the fault finding and the van still has the same fault, make up your own minds! I wont be buying another Renault, think I might fork out for a Transporter instead. Can’t afford to have the van off the road and playing up as I am self employed and need it to be reliable. Pity as it is a great looking van.
Responses to this review
Do the later 2.0 ltr facelift models suffer from the same gearbox problems? - Steve from England
I had the same fault but had light on dash heater plug one, when the light was on it went well when light went out it ran like old cow. The noise appeared, buzzing noise, the same day the turbo went, say no more £500 for turbo +£75 per hr - Trooot Mcmillan from Ayrshire
I had all those problems myself with my Renault Trafic; mass air filter went, which was changed and helped alot but in the end the wiring was the problem, thank God I have a good mechanic who knows what he is doing and saved me a packet. I wouldn’t go near a main dealer as they would rip you off, so take it to a small garage with a good rep and also look after the van as it will look after you. Five mins prior to going, start it up to warm up the turbo etc., and also on a long journey leave it for a few mins for the turbo to slow down. I have 190,000 plus on mine and I change oil, fuel filter, air filters etc every 6000 miles. So long as you don’t drive like a lunatic in it, it will stand you in good stead. Also, I have had the new 2 litre turbo trafic 2007 model which isn’t as good on fuel compared to the 2004 model 1.9 turbo. One last thing, don’t bother with the big roof racks as the they only weigh you down as they weigh a tonne causing you to eat fuel as well - Michael from County Antrim
The problem with your engine not revving in the rain is caused by water getting into the wiring. The throttle on these things ain’t cable, it’s by wire (electrical). Open the bonnet and on the RHS inner wing you will see where all the wires collect. There is a big green plug in there. Disconnect it and spray lots of WD40 into it and connect back together. Guaranteed problem solved. - Dave from Scotland
I have the Nissan primastar 2 ltr version, exactly the same vehicle, which the injectors have shorted out due to water running down the wiring loom under the bonnet. The injectors have seized in engine, Nissan don’t want anything to do with it; it’s 2 1/2 years old 70k. Water running down the wiring loom under the bonnet but apparently it’s not a fault, it’s going to cost me a small fortune BEWARE DONT BUY THESE VEHICLES THEY ARE ALL A PILE OF S**T - Mark Wilson from Devon
Update on the Renault. The clutch gave up the ghost, had that fixed, then the gearbox started making a racket so I sold the bloody thing. I’m never going buy another Renault - Tim Dale from England
I am with you, Tim. I am a trafic hater and will never buy Renault again - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-03-13 | ID: 4823 | 2/10
![]()
I buy and sell loads of these, and are great as long as you remember a few things. Firstly, the van is mainly made of Renault components, which being are not built like VW or BMW German vehicles. Secondly, all the vans suffer from gearbox problems; this is due to the oil fill hole being too low in the gearbox and subsequently first and second is starved from oil. The best way to avoid this is to fill the gearbox via one of the joining boltholes. But Renault and Vauxhall will drain to the ’advised’ level during their services (made eh). A lot of courier and taxi companies do this and have achieved 200k plus on each gearbox. Lastly, like any car or indeed anything, which has moving parts, the more stress you put on them - the quicker they will break. These vans can begin to fall down at 60km but have had them owned by odd job old boys, which were like new at 170k. Be nice to these vans and they’ll last, drive them hard and they can be a pain!
Responses to this review
How much do you recommend to put in as an over fill will be just as bad? Thanks - John Cooper from Yorkshire
I have a DCI 115 07 and can’t get a gear without a major fight; it is as if something is slowly seizing up, could this be due to gear box oil? - Tim from Aberdeenshire
Quite interested in knowing more about adding extra gearbox oil, how is this achieved? - Gav from England
Submitted: 2010-03-12 | ID: 4819 | 5/10
![]()
I checked out many cars before buying this one, working down a list of "must haves". This looked a great car to meet most of my needs. Small, compact and nippy. Economic to run. Simple to park. Easy on the eye. Very reliable. An all round excellent car. Only trouble is I can’t walk and my wheelchair doesn’t fit in the boot. It’s a hell of a struggle to get it in the back seat. Like I said, meets MOST of my needs, did I mention I’m forgetful? Perhaps a great sound system would make me feel better!
Submitted: 2010-03-11 | ID: 4804 | 4/10
![]()
I certainly wish I had known this excellent site existed before buying my Megane 1.6 CC in February 2009. Like the majority, it leaks like a sieve passenger and drivers door, and has had several trips back to the dealer for attention. After the last visit, the door windows now stand proud of the roof seals in the up position and it’s worse than ever. What is worrying me more is the hideous judder when accelerating away in first gear. I am quite an experience driver of over 25 years on the road and have never come across anything like this before. It appears to be intermittent and once the car is warm the problem occurs. I have had the car back to the dealer with this problem and, but it never does it with a mechanic at the wheel, it was plugged into the diagnostic machine and showed nothing. Dealer blamed driver. The strange thing is that whenever my partner drives it, there is no judder, so is it me? Any help would be appreciated as this car is getting me down.
Responses to this review
My 58 Megane CC is currently having a new clutch fitted because of the "judder". Sometimes it’s a little one only I notice, other times it shakes the car like mad! - Mike from Yorkshire
It’s 100% the clutch going mate. I guarantee it will be broken completely soon, change the clutch and you will be OK - Dave Fredericks from England
Hi my 2008 Megane Coupe Convertable had the same problem with judder and needed a new clutch to be replaced. I contacted Renault services and they paid for this for me after some time on the phone. It was because of an oil seal that had gone which caused the oil to enter onto the clutch which caused the judder. The only way to stop it is a new clutch. It stops when it gets warm because the oil on the clutch is heated up so you notice the judder more in cold weather or when just starting to drive the car. Hope this helps - Gill from England
Submitted: 2010-03-10 | ID: 4795 | 1/10
![]()
This is my second Scenic and third Renault and will def be my last. I had a ’Check Emissions’ appear on my dash a couple of months ago, I called the RAC who informed me it sounded like the CAT was on its way out. I got it booked into my local Renault dealer who advised that yes the CAT had been smashed to bits due to a faulty Oxygen Sensor (thats what the garage told me), I was told by them that a Renault part had to be fitted otherwise it would cause problems in the future and the total cost is £1069. I called Renault UK head office to ask about goodwill as my car had only done 28,000 miles, which they agreed to go half with me. The car was booked in on the 11th February and that is where it is now still not fixed, the problem the CAT is on back order with France. Yes I have been give a hire car, although this was after a week of trying to organise one, but the customer service is S**T. I have not heard from the garage in over a week, not even a courtesy call. If anyone has had a similar problem I would love to hear from you.
Responses to this review
We had that a few days ago actually and the car struggling to start at first, it was like it was on kangaroo juice, it then packed up all together. We took it to a garage and the coils had gone, cost us £170 to replace 4 coils,labour and new spark plugs. Renault wanted to charge us £190 just to replace 2 coils, now this is the first day back so not sure if its resolved... - Helen Wallace from Lancashire
Submitted: 2010-03-10 | ID: 4792 | 3/10
![]()
Roof broke after 9 days, many other faults such as leaking windows. Final straw charged £52.75 to change a headlight bulb. l Will never buy Renault again!
Submitted: 2010-03-04 | ID: 4768 | 2/10
![]()
Bought brand new 3.5 years ago. Had to go back the day after I first picked it up. To date its been in 14 times, its had; 3x new clutches, flywheel, new gearbox ordered*, new steering column, 2x ball joints, wishbone(or similar), resprayed, fuel sensor, airbag light stuck on *not fitted due to legal proceedings. It’s now being handled by my solicitor. I have had an independent report done and it needs £8,500 spending, it’s only worth £4-5. My local main Renault dealership have been a joke. I’m going back to a faithful Toyota Hiace! Don’t be fooled by its looks, thats all they have, believe me!
Responses to this review
Hi I feel your pain, I have had 4 slave cylinders, a new seat, a cutting out problem, alarm going off and slave cylinder problem from new. It has regularly seviced by Renault every 18,000 miles. It has been off the road for 12 weeks from new, Oct 58 plate. Customer service has not helped, it had its 4th slave cylinder done at 126,000. One month on and guess what, slave cylinder has gone again. I took it to a garage and they said they never replaced the slave cylinder or clutch? Can your solictor give me any tips or help with my case? - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-03-03 | ID: 4761 | 3/10
![]()
I’ve just bought this car and I love it. It has enough power to suit me, although the 130 would have been more exhilirating but at 60 y/o I am delighted with this model. It offers economy, £35 road tax, loads of gizmos, confortable and it looks great. We have dogs and there is loads of space for the four of them in the boot. It would be great if all manufacturers were to offer moulded boot liners for us dog lovers to keep uphostery clean.
Submitted: 2010-03-03 | ID: 4760 | 5/10
![]()
I have owned my French wheelie bin (Renault Scenic) for over 4 years now. It is certainly very good when you want to shift stuff and junk, and also good for carrying 3 adults in the back. Plenty of room in the boot for the mother in law, which is very spacious. The downsides to owning a French car is the cost of work and repairs as the car gets older, I recently had a hi pressure diesel pump changed and this set me back a grand! That is why I have only given the rating 4 stars instead of 5. I have carried all sorts of stuff in the back, all my work kit, a huge double bed from Ikea, which was flat packed but the chunky mattress wasn’t. All in all a great car.
Submitted: 2010-02-27 | ID: 4726 | 4/10
![]()
These vans apear to be built to last, 100000 miles and thats it! Parking sensors, alternator, dash lights, £500 needed whole unit, speedo, remote locking, gearbox, windscreen seal all commoly reported faulty on vans somtimes with just 15000 miles on the clock. They are relatively nice to drive however with a smooth gear change and quick steering, if a little over assisted but the brakes seem weak when stoping from speed. The 115 engine is noticably livelier than the earlier 100bhp model but still doesn’t have any suprise punch facter.A well designed cabin is anuther feature of this van but compared to the Mercedes Vito the interior isn’t anything special to look at. As for the outside, even the facelift models are looking dated now, far too common a sight, these vans won’t age well and can get exspensive to maintain with milage.
I was glad to have sold mine.
Responses to this review
I have experienced none of these problems on my ’58 registered Sport. Indeed the only downside to owning this van is that it seems to be like a red rag to a bull to some Transit owners with go faster stripes on their bonnets. They always seem to speed up when I come to cruise past them! Yesteday I had to back off when I got to a 100mph as I don’t fancy losing my licence for a moments lunacy as he occupied the middle lane. The Transit still insisted on getting passed and then slowing down! Madness!! I should have sign on the back saying ’I am not racing today, thank you’. - Steve from England
Hi Steve, my experience is different started going wrong at 18,000 miles and never stopped four slave cylinders, clutches,injectors, anti-roll bars, seat worn out at 48,000 miles, alarm problems. Looks good but expensive - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2010-02-26 | ID: 4716 | 1/10
![]()
This is our third Megane diesel and we heve only had one minor problem with a 2004 model which was rectified without any fuss, even though warranty had expired. These cars are very comfortable, extremely economical and have a diesel engine that is second to none, it is a superb performer. Our last Megane was a 2006 model and a great car and the previous to that a 2004 model and superb also and both cars were sold locally and neither of the buyers has had any problem. Some respondents refer to reviews of the car and in many cases reviews count for nothing as Toyota buyers are now finding out. We have a B&B and a few years ago a gent stayed who writes reviews and I asked what are these reviews based on and he responded " in most cases what’s left in the front pocket". Our main dealer is James Sidney and its a pleasure to deal with him.
Submitted: 2010-02-25 | ID: 4706 | 4/10
![]()
If i could mark the pile of junk with minus 5 stars then I would. We have owned this car since the summer of 2009 and my wife uses it for work daily, about a 20 mile journey. First of all it was leaking water every time it rained and then the heater blew which has cost me well over £700, then the dash board packed in so I had to replace that at a cost of £631. Now the alarm goes of if you go within 10 foot of the useless piece of junk and to top it all of both the windows (drivers side and passenger side) have decided to die . I HATE THE CAR, DO NOT BUY RENAULT EVER.
Responses to this review
I have owned my renault scenic 54 plate for one year. I have never owned a Renault before and I certainly won’t be buying one again. Mine has been in two garages in 4 weeks and is still there, they said I needed a new engine costing £1150. The car was lacking power and ’check emmisions’ light on, also making a tapping noise. By the way car has done 33000 on the clock so I said go a head, they have taken the engine apart no problems put engine back they are still trying to find problem. I HAVE JUST PHONED TO SEE WHAT’S GOING ON; they don’t know. This is the first time I have ever written and moaned about anything. IF YOU HAVE ANY SENSE DO NOT BUY A RENAULT EVERTHING COSTS OVER £700 TO REPLACE! Sorry Glyn, just leting off a bit of steam, I’m so fed up. The only good thing is lots of leg room. Nice looking car that’s it. This car will bleed you dry. Thanks - Lorraine Sweeney from Lancashire
I agree, DO NOT BUY A RENAULT SCENIC!! Am in the middle of yet another drama with mine; all I want is to be able to run the kids from A to B without and major hassles and break downs and apparently it’s not to be. Paid over £700 for a service at my local Renault dealer in December, only to have (apparently) my big end bearing go last week, they’ve quoted me £3000 for a new engine!!! Am currently researching it a bit more and checking out my options but can’t afford to do that so it looks like my 6 year old diesel with average mileage may have come to the end of its short life already! AAAGGGGHHHHHH!!! - Georgia Macleod from Ross and Cromarty Shires
I completely agree Glyn and can’t wait to get rid. I just wish I’d come across this web site before i’d bought mine, it’s put me off Renaults for life! - Rachel Derby from England
Hi, we had same light come on as you, check emissions, took it to garage and the fault was a faulty sensor. Cost less than 100 pounds to fix including going on diagnostic machine. They did phone Renault and it’s a common fault on Renaults of a certain couple of years - Jayne from Derbyshire
Submitted: 2010-02-24 | ID: 4698 | 1/10
![]()
Great car, lots of Grunt. Still looks good and up to date.
Submitted: 2010-02-22 | ID: 4674 | 5/10
![]()
Although the Renault Megane Coupe is not everyone’s favourite car, it is my dream car as it has style and character. From the front it looks ready to pounce at any second and from the back it has an instantly recognisable style. In my opinion deep blue is the best colour as it is more classy than the brighter colours. The interior is stylish and comfortable with 4 partially leather bucket seats and dark blue fabric. A six stack CD player and speakers in the back and front enable everyone to hear the music you want to hear clearly. The 1.6 16 valve engine ensures a speedy smooth ride, perfect for long journeys but also handy for shorter journeys around town. At 45 the MPG is not too bad either. The only problem is that there is very little room in the back for passengers legs. Over all it is a good little car!
Submitted: 2010-02-20 | ID: 4658 | 4/10
![]()
This is my second laguna, which is a step forward from the Laguna 2, (not a bad car). The current one has been a good choice to date after almost 2 years; it is nicely made, goes well no rattles or faults handles well for an estate and does the job as a load carrier in comfort. The ride unladen on poor roads can be jiggly, but this apart i love it.
Submitted: 2010-02-20 | ID: 4657 | 4/10
![]()
Best van I ever bought. It had 96000 on the clock, all motorway driving, when I bought it, all it needed was a new steering pump. Now I have 140,000 on clock, all urban driving, still the same clutch and exhaust; I had to have new track rod ends for MoT at 126,000. Always starts first time, always serviced, 40+ miles to the gallon, lovely to drive, chipped it myself, I will buy another. Please dont hammer it, look after it and it will look after you.
Responses to this review
Well I still have my Renault Trafic now with 156k on the clock, it’s never let me down. This year I had new gear cables fitted disc & pads all round track rod end, cambelt + kit mot which cost me £1,000, but it’s like new again but I’ve done 32k since my last service, have to get it done soon. Reading all the reviews, I must have bought a good van that was well looked after by the first owner. I’m still on the same engine, gearbox, clutch, exhaust, and battery. I got a good van here. Bye for now - Brian Ellway from Somerset
Submitted: 2010-02-18 | ID: 4641 | 5/10
![]()
The 2005 model is our fourth Scenic. We have had very little trouble with it, it is comfortable, roomy, pleasant to drive and swallows up almost any amount of cargo. After 5 years it has recently developed a few rattles, but still starts and goes every time. We will buy a diesel next time because the tax regime in Ireland has changed, favouring low CO2 engines.
Submitted: 2010-02-18 | ID: 4636 | 5/10
![]()
I bought this car second-hand at the 3 year point but thankfully I had paid to have an extended 3 year AA warranty included in the price. This more than paid for itself within the first year after 2 trips back to the garage to replace the coils and more recently to have the drivers electric window mechanism replaced, a commonality with these cars it seems. I would advise to steer clear of servicing at Renault garages as not only are their services over priced, but I’ve checked before and after the work is carried out and found that they haven’t even done what is stated on the service sheet, so it’s no wonder faults continue to develop on them. Otherwise, it has been a fantastic family car proving reliable day in and out on the daily chores and being a comfortable ride on longer holiday trips. You pay for what you get though, and you have to remember that aftersales service is just a big a money maker for the car industry these days! Bon voyage ;D
Submitted: 2010-02-17 | ID: 4629 | 3/10
![]()
An okay car for a runabout, although cheaply built. Horrible seating position, steering wheel is far too big (like an old transit stearing wheel) and handles like a boat. Just plain horrible to drive.
Responses to this review
There must be something seriously wrong with your car, Graeme. I have a 2005 (2006 reg) 1.2 16V and it’s a GREAT car. Well built, good performance, good economy and very comfortable. Handles like a well sorted sports car. Mind you, it has 196/50X15 tyres on Wolfrace alloys so that helps. The build quality is very good (built in France not RSA) and the driving position is good. However I concede the steering wheel is a tad large. In summary: the Clio is great in town and country. I would not hesitate to drive it to Cape Town - 1,000 miles from here - Syd Harling from South Africa
Submitted: 2010-02-16 | ID: 4625 | 2/10
![]()
Great litle car to drive, very good MPG, goes well. Big Gripe: Brakes grab until worn in every trip, leave the car for over hour and brakes grab even at very low speed under 2mph. Had car back to dealer who found no fault of course, not brakes, had been worn in. Anyone had same problem? Please advise.
Submitted: 2010-02-11 | ID: 4592 | 3/10
![]()
I have had this, my Postman Pat (that what my grand children call it), for 4 months now and I can only say that it has been a fun to have. Being 6’5" and with the weight to go with it, I can only say that getting into the vehicle has been tremendous. No more bumping my head or rubbing it against the head liner. The van is economical on fuel 5.8lt/100km runs at a steady 120kph on the highway, what more can I want? My wife and I travel all over with it. Exellent vehicle and now I want to ask Renault to do something for my city of East London, South Afrika "Join Mercedes-Benz and build your factory here!" Thank you
Submitted: 2010-02-10 | ID: 4587 | 5/10
![]()
As with many of you on this site, we too experienced quite a bad leak in our roof of our Megane convertible, we bought this in march 09 from the Renalut Driveline, Ashford, Kent, but I am hoping that my story turns out to have a happy ending. Our car is just under the standard warranty when we brought it in to have the leaks looked at. We were told the the standard warranty did not cover the roof and seals etc, but they did not brush us aside like many of you unfortunate people ,they agreed to go halfs in the cost of replacing the front seal and re-sealing the panoramic roof, taking out the seats and draining any excess water & carpets etc., until dry. We are really hoping that this will resolve the matter, and that we do not have to part with any more money. The manager seems confident that his service engineers will replace the seals that need doing and there will be no more leaks. I really hope so, as I love my car and it would make all the difference in buying from them again and again. I will return to this site after the car is done and inform you of how it all went.....hopefully it will restore some of your faith in the Renault dealer ships. Watch this space..
Responses to this review
Lisa, I am pleased to hear that you have had such good service from Driveline Ashford. I wish I could say the same. My car is a 56 plate and was bought from Driveline in Feb. 09. It was great in the summer but has been in and out of the garage since October with "water ingress". It has cost a fortune and the garage’s attitude is, well what do you expect if you by a cabriolet!! I hope this makes the website because my last comments have never been included and they were honest and polite - Annemarie Bolt from Kent
Our car has leaked from day one 04 model - David from Bedfordshire
My wife has a 07 plate 1.6 cabriolet that we purchased privately in Jan-09. Within a month the roof was leaking. Although we had a warranty from the private garage it was still covered by Renault so booked into Driveline Ashford. They had it in about 6 times in all and replaced the seals adjusted the roof and then fitted new modified seals never having the car more than 2 days which I argued was a waste of time as the roof seemed to build up with water over a few days before leaking. I was then told by Driveline that car not developed for English weather and what else did I want them to do as they had done everything that Renault required them to do. I contacted Renault UK and spoke to a Gareth West who put me onto KAP garage in Folkestone service manager called Matt. I had the car in for 6 weeks total, even had the Renault specialists down to it. The roof was totally stripped down and they found 2 holes had been drilled in the roof frame that should not have been there. A new roof was fitted and there is not even a drip now, Matt and KAP garage were brilliant, Gareth at Renault UK even paid for me to get the interior valeted. Driveline waste of space and as long as your car is less than 3 years old, regardless of service records, the Renault warranty stands and you do not pay - Michael Carpenter from Kent
My wife has a 07 plate 1.6 Cabriolet that we purchased privately in Jan-09, Within a month the roof was leaking. Although we had a warranty from the private garage it was still covered by Renault so booked into Driveline Ashford. They had it in about 6 times in all and replaced the seals adjusted the roof and then fitted new modified seals, never having the car more than 2 days which I argued was a waste of time as the roof seemed to build up with water over a few days before leaking. I was then told by Driveline that the car was not developed for English weather and what else did I want them to do as they had done everything that Renault required them to do. Contacted Renault UK and spoke to a Gareth West who put me onto KAP garage in Folkestone, Service Manager called Matt. They had the car in for 6 weeks total, even had the Renault specialists down to it. The roof was totally stripped down and they found 2 holes had been drilled in the roof frame that should not have been there. A new roof fitted and there is not even a drip now, Matt and KAP garage were brilliant, Gareth at renault UK even paid for me to get the interior valeted. Driveline waste of space and as long as your car is less than 3 years old regardless of service records the Renault warranty stands and you do not pay - Michael Carpenter from Kent
Submitted: 2010-02-09 | ID: 4582 | 4/10
![]()
I have had my car 4 days....tried the roof 3 times now and on the 4th go the plastic bit that lifts up, letting the roof move then moves back once complete, doesn’t work; it lifts up but then doesn’t go back down. It’s going back to dealer on saturday, hope this is not that start of many problems.
Responses to this review
Same problem in 2004 seems they have not fixed it yet! - David from Bedfordshire
Hi Paul, I am having the same problem but mine broke 2 days after I got the car.. dealer is refusing to do anything about it, just wondering what was the issue was with your car and the costs? I’ve already paid out over £200 to investigate the issue robcop_8182@hotmail.co.uk - Paul Coppell from England
Any help any one can give me with this problem will be much appreciated. scott@rentmansoftware.com thanks - Scott Emmons from London
Hi there Paul. I would be interested to know how the story of your non-opening roof ended. Did you get it sorted and was it easy or a nightmare. Apart from that, how do you find it? Many thanks, a prospective owner - Ann McBeth from Surrey
Submitted: 2010-02-04 | ID: 4548 | 4/10
![]()
I’m having major problems with this car. First of all the heater broke. Got that fixed then the 2 key cards stopped working; got messages on the screen saying card not detected.Cost £260 for 2 new key cards; had them ordered and paid for through my Renault dealer on the Tuesday, then on the Wednesday the car halts whilst I’m driving it and says injection failure. I had to have the car towed to my parents house and it’s been sat there ever since. My mechanic has been up to look at it and he said just to scrap it ’cos it’s not worth fixing; there goes £4500. Have just rang Renault and have been told that to fix the problem it could cost anything up to £3000!!! So now I’m sitting with a car that won’t drive and 2 new keys waiting to be programmed to the car. We bought the car Sept 2008 and it’s only really been used for school runs and shopping, just general usage. NEVER, EVER WILL I BUY A RENAULT AGAIN!!
Submitted: 2010-02-03 | ID: 4540 | 1/10
![]()
I have had this car a few months now and it is fantastic, it suits me perfectly as I can use it as a van with the seats down or as a car. My model has all of the extras:- a/c, remote c/l, e/w, etc. It is great on fuel, comfortable and very spacious. The only thing I have had go wrong is temperamental electric windows, I think it has a short in the drivers side door, when I bang it, it works again! I had the basic model Renault Kangoo 1.9 turbo diesel a few years ago and it was great as well. I would definitely recommend it if you need a roomy car.
Submitted: 2010-01-30 | ID: 4488 | 4/10
![]()
An appaling piece of c**p to be honest! So many problems, but first the good points; comfortable, and thats it. My car’s electrics have a mind of their own and the dashboard rattles really loudly when taking off on a hill. Also the 6 speed is a pain in the ass because when you are in 6th gear and want to drop a gear to over take there is no power on reserve.
Submitted: 2010-01-28 | ID: 4470 | 2/10
![]()
This was my first brand new car and if you asked me face to face I’d say its been a great car to own and drive. For interior comfort and spaciousness it ticks all the boxes. It’s taken us all around the country including a holiday to Ireland However when I actually think about it after only 6 years its had 3 new exhausts, a new catalytic converter, a new alternator, new brake discs, and just recently a new battery and now the prop shaft has gone. That doesn’t include all the small service type things that needed attended to. Funnily enough no major electrical problems. Now I’ve found out it’s only worth around £2000 after costing around £17000. My psychic told me to avoid the metallic blue car but did I listen?! Would I buy renault again..maybe. I had a laguna before the fidji with no major problems except the exhausts again.
Responses to this review
Diane, You have selected you wish to enter the Parrot RKi8400 competition we’re running but haven’t left your email address. Please send it in to us if you still wish to enter. Thanks, Roadtestreports.co.uk
Submitted: 2010-01-28 | ID: 4462 | 3/10
![]()
Horrible,depressing recycled plastic interior. Nylon like fabrics worthy of the 1970s. Carpet like egg box material. Performance of a snail. Shadily designed car that requires the financial input of a Jag to maintain, due to designed in difficulties, such as the ridiculous front lights and rare tyre designs.
Submitted: 2010-01-25 | ID: 4435 | 1/10
![]()
Well, I am on the second Vivaro (same as Trafic) now, the first one was an 03 plate the only problem I had with it was the gearbox bearings (told by vauxhall mechanic it was design fault) at 70k; sold it at 2 years 9 months old with 100k on the clock. I had no other issues with it. Second one is a 55 plate. The day after it was collected from the dealership (104 mile on the clock) it desided not to do more that 20mph, it did not matter if I was going up or down hill or which direction the wind was blowing, it would only do 20mph. Local dealer (who I did not buy it from) were brilliant; faulty ecu replaced. Have still got it and it has 150k on the clock. It has been serviced regularly and I have had no further problems untill today, when it’s decided to loose power intermittantly. I will let you know what it is when I sort it out. Having said that, I will definitely buy another one when the time come to replace it.
Responses to this review
Hi there, I would be interested to know what caused the intermittent power loss, if you have the time to reply. Thanks in advance - Tim Baugh from France
My Trafic is an 02 reg and it too just does 20 mph now and then but I have no warning, it just does it when I’m driving along. I just stop the van, turn off the ignition and then start it again. My friend said it was something called limp mode for when there is a fault on the engine. So I’ve just fitted a new engine and can’t get it to start at all... Lee Nulty from Cheshire
Hi, I have had a few Renault Masters and a common fault is blocked injectors. It is easy to resolve, just pour half a bottle of jet cleaner in your fuel tank, make sure you get the one for diesel or petrol. Symptoms: No power and white smoke like the turbo has blown once it has cleared. Add jet cleaner every 4 or 5 fills and it wont happen again - Stephen Catten from Hampshire
Submitted: 2010-01-24 | ID: 4426 | 5/10
![]()
New shape version. Great Car joy to drive, you would never know it was a 1.4 petrol when driving it, same power as a 2lt, but it’s a shame about the stink that comes up from the engine as long as you dont mind the head aches, sick feeling and breathing problems or driving with the window open and heater off when its -6 them go and buy one, and when you return it to the dealers for them to look at and he drives it 12 miles and says he can’t smell anything and "do you mean that smell? (bonet open) On the right hand side of the engine?" and I quote "It’s a new car smell." I call it toxic fumes. Please look at some other make of car dont buy Renault as the dealership is rubbish and unhelpful.
Submitted: 2010-01-23 | ID: 4417 | 1/10
![]()
Never buy a Megane, I have covered 29000 Miles in it from new and I’m not sure were to start about telling you all on how awfull this car is. It’s given me so much trouble in the past 3 years, I would need a few hours to tell you about it. When you look at the reliability surveys online and you see that this is the worst, trust me it’s not joking. I’ve seen them and I thought, it can’t be that bad, honestly its worse than that. Never ever ever buy a Megane or a Renault for that matter because I have learnt after owning 2 of them. I gave it one star (thats me being generous about it) because of the shockingly bad mechanical & electrical reliability.
Submitted: 2010-01-22 | ID: 4411 | 1/10
![]()
I bought a Renault Megane Cabriolet in 2007. It has been in the garage 5 times for the same Water Ingress repair. It is impossible to drive the car in the rain as you arrive at your destination absolutely drenched. The mechanic has told me that it is: (1) Due to parking the car on a slope with the wind and rain facing the car! and (2) Due to me not cleaning the seal every week with furniture polish!! The garage take no responsibility and Renault won’t even answer my letters. I have taken it a step further now and written to Watchdog, in the hope that many of you have done the same. Only then will we maybe get something done about this. Why should we pay good money to drive a car Not Fit For Purpose? And also be told all these fabrications as to why the fault keeps happening? Renault need a kick up the exhaust and we should all join together in this one.
Responses to this review
Same problem here hence never buy Megane again - David from Bedfordshire
Sounds like you are beign told a load of porkies. We have a 2008 model & have never been near it with any furniture polish or anything else & have never seen any leakage no matter where or how we park it! - John Cousins from Norfolk
Hi. I agree with all you have detailed here and got some of the same responses. The extras on mine as like you I had from new are the handbrake failed and was still on. I was asked by a mechanic at Renault if I had put the handbrake on correctly which obviously I had as otherwise when I got out it would have gone down the hill and was still on when I got it out of a wall. I then had to go and get tested on a handbrake machine to see if I could put it on enough, which obviously I can. The letter sent to the exec of Renault ustomer services had no response and the after service is appalling. Now mine is in the garage again with a fuel and injector leak, the faults are never ending - Jenny Webb from England
Submitted: 2010-01-21 | ID: 4405 | 1/10
![]()
The worst car I have ever owned. It’s just done 50000 miles, I bought it at 14000 miles - just at the end of the 3 year warnnty. It’s had reversing light problems which would not work, bulbs ok, new switch fuse ok, but cost £56 to fix, said it was a wiring problem; new water pump £250 - was leaking; new passenger electric window unit £300; now it looks like it needs a new head gasket heater blower resistor pack needed replacing £399.
Responses to this review
Where is the head gasket heater blower resistor pack located? - Colin from Dumfriesshire
Submitted: 2010-01-21 | ID: 4386 | 1/10
![]()
It’s all down to luck really, I had a 1.6 petrol 2005 CC which leaked like a sieve, brakes howled and it judded in 1st. Also quite creaky. Being a sucker for punishment I traded it in for an ’07 also 1.6 but with 5 horses less. It has been like day and night. Roof has been in some heavy downpours and whilst not watertight it is fine, clutch is correct taking off and roof doesn’t creak as much. All round a much better car even though it is the same car. In fact it is a much livlier machine even though it has 5 horses less. Living in Spain I have roof up and down all the time and it’s fine. Breaks still howl but I find it a fun car to own and drive.
Submitted: 2010-01-20 | ID: 4360 | 4/10
![]()
Bought this car when it was about a year old, and loved it, very little problems for the first few years, but as other people have reported at 5 years it just seems to fall apart. Heater not working properly, sunroof not working, keyless entry not working properly, clutch has gone, £1000 drive shaft gone, £300 aircon doesn’t work... and the list grows, don’t buy one more than 3 years old, that’s for sure.
Submitted: 2010-01-20 | ID: 4355 | 1/10
![]()
I had owned this van for 4yrs 2months. Nice to drive and plenty of space inside. Just traded it it in with many problems raising their ugly head. Have had to replace the following items on it: 2 x Mass air flow meters at £200 a pop, Alternator £400, Power Steering Pump £400. Had the cambelt replaced (£600) 6months ago only to have the job redone when the diesel pump broke costing an additional £1250! Garage told me that 3 out of the 4 glow plugs had stopped working potentially costing £1500 to replace if they had become seized in the head. The gearbox was starting to make noises that the garage said would need replacing at a cost of approx £3000+labour+VAT (Renault main dealer and brand new gearbox). Recon box would have cost £1500+labour+VAT! All this is on a 03 plate with 89,000miles. Has a full service history, so had not been neglected either. Would not buy another one of these vehicles as they are too unreliable!
Submitted: 2010-01-20 | ID: 4354 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car in September 2009, I have to say its a great looker, but that’s all it really is apart from a pain in the a**e. Had nothing but problems from the start. Only starts when it wants to, dashboard now showing ELECTRONIC FAULT, only Renault can rectify this problem which means departing from a lot of hard earned cash. This seems to be a common problem with Megane’s or shall I say RENAULT’S. Moral of the story DO NOT BUY A RENAULT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED...
Responses to this review
I have had the same problem. I bought this car, 2004 Renault privilege convertible, in December 2009 23rd to be exact. I have had nothing but trouble with it from the minute I got it. I have had it in the garage 3 times for electrical faults. The wipers have now gone twice and then start on their own again maybe a day or two after the fact. Also driving home this evening 7/5/2010 and the injection fault light came on with the stop light on as well. Don’t know what to do. Do you have the same problem? - Jill Barton from County Armagh
Hi Jill, I’m assuming it was Shelboune Motors you took your Megane to? I have a 2004 Megane 1.5 dCi Dynamique 5Dr and I have been having nothing but trouble with the engine and electrics. The ’STOP’ warning light and ’Injection Fault’ on the dash board appeared the other day and Shelbourne quoted £1300 to fit a new pump and 4 new injectors. I’m not impressed with the Renault customer service/ Shelbourne Motors Renault or the cars themselves - Suzanne Sloan from County Armagh
Submitted: 2010-01-19 | ID: 4339 | 3/10
![]()
We have a Renault Dynamique Sport Tourer 2007 reg, purchased from a Renault dealer via "Renault to go" in 2008. We have had a clutch judder since purchasing the vehicle from Renault’s dealer in Norwich. The car is still under warranty (until April 2010), but Renault UK have refused to replace the clutch to date and will do nothing to help us. The judder has become so bad now when the clutch is warm, that it is now unsafe to pull out at junctions or roundabouts and having a baby in the car, this is really frightening me. I’ve had two near misses and am just waiting for that serious accident to happen, either to me, or to someone else. We are currently threatening Renault UK with legal action (we don’t know what else to do!), unless they try a replacement clutch in the vehicle, or indeed fix the problem they have created. Renault UK have confirmed that clutch judder is a manufacturing defect, due to the materials they use within their clutches and is a common problem with many Renaults, not just Meganes. When the clutch becomes hot, the materials used cannot grip due to lack of moisture, which causes the clutch to slip, resulting in the judder. Apparently Renault used to use asbestos in their older clutches, which worked very well, but are no longer allowed to do so under modern legislation. Renault are apparently working on a solution but will not confirm when this will be sorted and will not replace the clutch in view of this! In the meantime, everyone with a dangerous vehicle is left still driving on the road with no other option. I’m just waiting for the accident to happen. Then, if me and my baby boy are still here, I shall be suing them big time!
Responses to this review
I had to respond to this report as we have exactly the same problem as Juliette. We have a 2008 renault megane which has recently developed a judder when pulling away particulary on an incline in first and second gear, again this is noticible when the car is warm The garage claim it is not dangerous but we lose acceleration pulling off and cannot respond safely to the road conditions. Our car is a motability car for our disabled son. The garage has said that they are waiting for a modified clutch to be delivered from renault and have waved a vague two week promise at us. Meanwhile I’m waiting for that accident to happen too, particularly as we have to use short sliproads on to dual carriage ways and busy roundabouts everyday on our sons school run to his special school. Good news is that motability if the RAC agree with us about this fault being dangerous will provide us with a hire car for the duration but this situation is not satisfactory. This fault is dangerous not just inconvenient - Fiona from England
Submitted: 2010-01-16 | ID: 4330 | 3/10
![]()
I’ve had my Megane since March 09 and simply love the machine. My previous was a Peugeot 307 which squeaked and rattled after only 1000 miles. I have covered 12500 miles with the Megane now and it’s as tight and quite as the day I picked it up. My fuel economy is averaging 42mpg. Being the Dynamique model it has Bluetooth, auto lights and a hands free entry system which I could not live without now. Best car I have ever owned and will buy again in an instant.
Submitted: 2010-01-14 | ID: 4305 | 5/10
![]()
Bought my Clio grande in 2002 when it had been used as a courtesy car for 6 months from new. It had 5,000 miles on the clock. Now 8 years later, it has 46,000 mileage and I’m thinking of trading it in for another Clio. It’s only let me down once, and that was only because it needed a new battery. Apart from an odd new tyre and windscreen wiper, it’s cost me nothing in repairs. Great little car, very reliable and economical. I just hope my next one will serve me as well!
Submitted: 2010-01-14 | ID: 4298 | 5/10
![]()
If you’re in the market for a motoring marvel to banish the bleak winter blues, I might just have the recipe from the land of Cordon Bleu. At a price from £29,550 - which is not too high, not too low, but just right - Renault are able to serve you with some tastily packaged ingredients. There’s a spicy dash of power thanks to the new 3.0 litre V6 diesel which produces it’s 235bhp and 450Nm of torque in such a smooth and refined way that it sets benchmarks in its class and one wonders if it’s a turbine. Combine this with a six speed automatic transmission that gives seamless changes and this beautiful coupe performs just as the looks suggest it should. There’s an alluring sleekness of presentation with a head turning look that is a fine balance between modernity and timelessness to give it outstanding road presence. ("Is that another £100,000 Aston Martin?" enquired a neighbour.) and there’s a reassuring sense of competence, ensuring it will serve you practically as well as aesthetically. We’re talking here about the new Laguna Coupe GT, which is much more than simply a stylish two-door car. Underneath its striking lines, with the benefit of Renault’s 4Control chassis with four wheel steering on this GT version, it delivers a dynamic, secure and hugely rewarding driving experience. Not even a foggy day in deep December could dispel the Gallic insouciance of this Regal Renault. It’s a car for the people, made by those who believe the people deserve the best. Behind the wheel you feel like nobility, but at the pump you’ll pat yourself on the back for it’s good old proletarian commonsense. Despite it’s ability to fly to over 150mph the combined economy nears 40mpg. It’s the sort of car that everyone loves - and thankfully - many can afford. It would be a shame to squander such a plethora of desirable features such as ultra efficient climate control, supreme audio quality and fast, intuitive satellite navigation on a privileged mad Marquis - but make no mistake: were they to sample it’s fine combination of style, engineering and comfort, they’d be first in the queue to acquire one. It’s a car for the style conscious who don’t have to be conscious of style, embodying flair with taste and taste with piquancy. Point it down the road and passers by immediately imagine it must be a ’supercar’ on vacation from the Riviera. It is, indeed, a super car, but I have to say - minus the disadvantages of that ludicrously expensive and temperamental breed. The French, along with many of us today, might have had to give up their ’Disque Bleu’ in public but they still are proud enough to stamp their individuality on their EU neighbours via the products of their national motor industry. With this Laguna Coupe, the only smoking you’ll see is the steam coming out of the ears of their rivals! Getting down to business, this is a supremely stylish, technically advanced, luxuriously appointed car that is rich in driving rewards. The lean lines do not compromise cabin space and comfort, with plush appointments making a most relaxing driving environment. It’s very safe too, with active and passive systems providing a sense of security as you explore the dynamics of the four wheel steering - which enabled me to negotiate a tortuous route across Shropshire with total composure. Only Monet could have created a better impression than this Laguna. So, as I wended my way through fog filled lanes I seemed to see light ahead. Was it the dawn of Spring? Did the azure Mediterranean lie beyond? No. It was just the feeling imparted to me by the French motor industry’s equivalent of a gastronomic delight. Behind the wheel I was in accord with Arthur Daley, when he famously opined ’The world is ones’ lobster’ - Thermidor, of course!
Submitted: 2010-01-13 | ID: 4289 | 5/10
![]()
I bought this car with just 10,000 on the clock. It’s always a pleasure to sit inside the cabin and is smooth as anything. Having driven hired brand new Mondeo’s and Vectra’s I couldn’t wait to get back to my Laguna. My missus had a brand new Vectra for the whole summer foir work and was desparate to get bck to the Laguna! Great thing is you don’t see many about so it’s a real head turner - those sheep in their BMW’s, Audis, Vectras and Mondeos don’t know what they’re missing and long may it stay that way. I love this car!
Submitted: 2010-01-13 | ID: 4279 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had this van from new, and done 48000 miles trouble free.It’s now out of warranty and the electrical warning light has come on, I can’t select Auto mode and the snow mode button won’t work . Has anyone any idea what is wrong? Renault want 90 quid to look at it, but I suspect they should know what is up and are having me over. The van drives ok using Quick shift mode But I’m worried things will get worse. Anyone had similar problems?
Responses to this review
Ref to your query, I had a simalar problem and found one of the heater plugs was faulty, once replaced the fault was cleared - David Rowsell from Cornwall
Submitted: 2010-01-12 | ID: 4277 | 4/10
![]()
We bought the car from new and we are very happy with the 1.5 diesel engine. It does 60mpg on a run. However, recently we are getting clutch judder in first gear which gets worse as we drive for longer, very annoying. I think the car may be out of warranty now, does anybody know if its difficult to fix?
Responses to this review
I’ve had an accident in my Transporter T5 174 2006. I braked to enter a side turning and felt a normal firm brake pedal but with little or no braking power at all. (Dry road - no ABS pulsing pedal sensation) I smashed into a wall and parked car. I reversed back and brakes then seemed to work OK. Been driving 35 years with no accidents. Something is very wrong here. I felt this lack of braking power just once before but it was so momentary I unfortunately thought no more of it. Been looking on the web and there are many reports of similar mysterious servo/braking problems with VAG vehicles - Steve58 from London
I had a new clutch on my 2006 fitted just at the last few days of it’s warranty last July. The car had only done 18,000 miles and had been mine from new. Renault would not cover it under warranty and said it was "driver error". I had the judder for about 1 month before I took it to the dealer so was very disappointed at the outcome - Niki Swanborough from London
Submitted: 2010-01-08 | ID: 4255 | 4/10
![]()
My husband hired a small car for our holiday in Crete, in 2002. This turned out to be a Renault Twingo, a car which I had not previously heard of. My opinion of it was, that it was a horrible little car. All right, it was brand new, had a hatchback, air-conditioning (necessary in Crete) and a "trendy" silly-colour (ours was mustardy yellow), and it was cheap to run. It ran up the narrow, steep and winding mountain roads well enough. But, with two men in the front seats, I was sitting as the only passenger in the back seat, and even I, as a small woman felt cramped. It was horribly uncomfortable getting in and out of the back seat. The two front doors were small (it’s a small car), and they, the low roof and the front seats, even when tipped fully forward, didn’t give you much room to squeeze out. I had to twist my body uncomfortably and awkwardly just to slide out slowly, sideways. Awful! I’d no control over window ventilation in the back seat, and I felt as if I were travelling in a tightly-closed bubble. I would never buy one or any other like it. I don’t know who this car was designed for, but it certainly isn’t a passenger’s car. Maybe it’s mainly for solitary urban drivers, who might sometimes have a passenger on a short journey, or might occasionally have very mini-children (or a dog) in the back; but it’s certainly not a family car. Far too many car reviews are written only from the driver’s point-of-view. They never seem to review from the passenger’s position. If they did, 2/3 doors arrangements on small cars with rear passenger seats, would have died a well-deserved death a long time ago.
Submitted: 2010-01-03 | ID: 4234 | 2/10
![]()
I have had 3 of these Trafics, all of them have had major problems inc EGR valves. 1 had a gearbox at 100 miles!!!!!! At the moment the 1.9 dci I have is in my garage (it won’t start at all now) having come back from the dealers after a new head, pump, injectors etc., and its only done 40000! DONT BUY THIS S***t
Responses to this review
I have to ask, why, after major problems with your first and second Trafic you bought a third? Surely the old adage applies about ’a fool and his mistakes’? - Martin from Derbyshire
Submitted: 2010-01-01 | ID: 4219 | 1/10
![]()
The good parts about this dci 86 car first... Most comfortable ride in it’s class. Amazingly low fuel consumption for its size, nudging 60mpg in Leeds. Is a proper four-seater, with a proper boot/trunk. No annoying engine, wind, tyre noise. No squeaks, rattles and groans. No electronic faults so far... However, The clutch needs redesigning along with that daft dual-mass flywheel. Too heavy, slightly juddery, slightly snatchy. Two different mechanics tried it ,said quite normal, nothing actually wrong. After only a month’s use from purchase second hand at 88,000miles, (’56 reg.) there have been injector problems flagged up on display with loss of power and blue smoke. Revving the engine in driveway shows misfire and smoke smelling of badly burned diesel. Currently trying various brands of injector cleaner to try and sort. These are v. high pressure systems (runs at 25,000lbs/sq") so it may take some time to cure. It’s ok and plenty power at the moment... It’s my opinion that the french car builders shoot themselves in the foot over practical commonsense things, something Ford and Opel/Vauxhall don’t seem to do to anything like the same extent. The most reliable car I ever had was a Ford Mondeo diesel, over six years. I had a Citroen C4 with the 1.6 HDi engine before this megane -- fantastic car, a real road rocket; then it decided to set itself on fire while parked after only one year. It was a write-off, and it should have been recalled for mods. to the ABS brake unit, known to catch fire. Guess who the one previous owner was? Citroen leasing!!!
Submitted: 2010-01-01 | ID: 4218 | 3/10
![]()
We have owned our Grand Scenic for the last three years. Initially we had a few teething problems (mainly squeaky brakes, red pull-handle fell off folded rear seat) but most were sorted out under warranty. In general the car is fine. My hubbie hates the ’plastic bucket’. I agree it doesn’t have the looks of some cars around but it gets me to work and back every day without fail. It took us to France this year for our summer holiday and we didn’t have a moments problem with it. My main grumbles with it are the cost of replacement parts, wipers cost £60 per pair!!! To get a headlight changed will set you back £70. Why does it all have to cost so much. Why can’t you just go to halfords, buy the parts then DIY?? With three kids and two large dogs, we need a large car. With the size, MPG and good safety features, we thought this was the best car for us. My hubbie wants a Volvo XC90 next.
Responses to this review
Just checked the Halfords website and you can buy wiper blades and bulbs to fit the Renault Scenic (very easy to replace yourself). Renault dealers will try to rip you off. Tabitha from Kent
Submitted: 2009-12-31 | ID: 4193 | 4/10
![]()
I purchased this car from new mainly due to its spacious size and safety rating. I have covered 25000 miles with no major problems apart from a set of ignition coils that cost me £38 a set and I fitted myself with ease. The fuel economy ranges from 33 to 45 miles per gallon and if careful up to 50 can be achieved. The car is easy to do oil change etc for the diy person. I find there is ample power when there is 2 in the car and motorway driving is good as the car is very stable and can cruise at over 80mph all day. My only gripes are the passenger seat doesn’t recline fully to accomodate long loads and the centre gear change housing can make the left leg feel restricted. With the rear seats fully removed this car carries as much as a small van so is ideal for many uses.
Submitted: 2009-12-27 | ID: 4167 | 4/10
![]()
I won’t buy a Renault Scenic again I have a 1.9DCI, the diesel gives lots of problems. Also the parts are very expensive especially in a country like South Africa. It is cheaper to maintain a Toyota or a Volkswagen, many mechanics are familiar with them, but many mechanics are scared to work on a Renault. And not even Renault are always familiar with the faults on their own cars.
Responses to this review
Have to agree. Bought Renault scenic for my wife, ideal for kids to school etc., but out of warranty, and now everything starts caving. Parts not available, and after several complaints to Renault and advise leaving us with top gasket and cylinder head problems due bad service from dealers. When specific parts are needed, they try to sell you parts not needed, and even emergency spares not available. Promises and no delivery. Found it cheaper to maintain my Volvo S40 t4. Wont buy Renault again - Peter Steyn from South Africa
Submitted: 2009-12-26 | ID: 4153 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my Vivaro van (exactly the same as Renault Trafic) in 2003 and loved driving it. Comfortable, fast, good looking, pretty good gas milage but I got disappointed very quickly by facing repairs all the time. I had problems with breaks front ,back, alternator(generator) , turbo, electrical disorder,light bulbs all the time, steering. The body got rusty duts after 3 years. After 140.000 Km the shifting gear needed to be replaced and even replacing it with second hand parts still cost me 1200 euros. I found out later that this is a serial problem and it is very common among renault trafic and opel vivaro ( as they are the same thing). I sold it and will never buy a French car again. I need something reliable (Ford was an option but the reviews are bad about it as well) so I am gonna go with Toyota (excellent reviews) . I do not recomend renault,opel to any person who’s priority is reliability . I hope my experience will be of use to you.
Submitted: 2009-12-26 | ID: 4148 | 3/10
![]()
I bought this car in February 2008 with 70000 miles on it, since then it has needed a new clutch, gearbox, engine mount, exhaust, bonnet (the bonnet catch failed, flew up and put my wind screen through!), windscreen and finally a new starter motor. It’s not exactly reliable, is it?!!! Moving on to build quality; it rattles and squeaks like nothing you have ever heard. Poor quality materials in cabin, bodywork and shockingly bad reliability. Buy anything but a Clio.
Responses to this review
You bought a 70,000 mile car that could have been thrashed by a lunatic and complain that it squeaks and rattles? It’s unfair to judge a car that is out of manufacturer’s warranty with such a high mileage - Scott Fuller from Renfrewshire
Me again... Just to bring you up to date on my Clio from above. A few days ago, driving home, the airbags blew out - today the back axle went on me. Also the battery keeps discharging itself, leaving it unable to start.Time to get rid of this piece of c**p - Dean from County Tyrone
Hi Pete, One of my Aunts has a new Fiesta 1.4 TDCi Zetec+ and it’s given her so much trouble as well and its only 6 months old, she also has a SMax and likewise its giving nothing but trouble. My mum has a wee Peugeot 207 like mine (Insurance declared the clio too dangerous to be on the road so it was scrapped) and the Peugeot is a fantastic little car. She has drove hers from 2006 without any trouble at all. I was looking at the 207s and they don’t get a good review but I think personally people are biased against Peugeot. I made a mistake of buying the Clio rather than a 206, my mate bought the 206 I was going to buy (instead I bought the Clio), it’s 2001 and had more miles on it and it’s a great going car, no problems at all. I was warned by many mechanics about Clios but I needed a car and I stupidly bought the Clio, nothing but pure sh**e so they are - Dean from Northern Ireland
Dean here again, just a reply to Scott. This car was owned by a local lady who drove it 15 miles back and fowards to work everyday and she even told me before I stupidly bought it that it had gave her trouble from day 1 when she purchased it brand new. It’s gone now anyway, insurance sent it to the scrap yard (where all Renaults belong) and I now have a lovely Peugeot 207 Sport. Bottom line is that you have to be mad to buy a Renualt, in time you will find out if you buy one yourself. P.S. If this car was thrashed by a lunatic it would have broken years ago because Renault are sh**e!! - Dean from County Tyrone
I had a Clio from new, a 1999 1.6 16v model and loved it to bits. It never broke down in 95k miles and only had to replace wear and tear parts like brakes. It had a few new batteries but I expected that. Yes it started to rattle a bit but that was after I had the suspension lowered and therefore it was a harder ride. Since then I have had 2 brand new Toyotas which were a disaster from start to finish and I ended up rejecting the second one, a Yaris. I would have a Clio any day but I now have a new Ford Fiesta which is so much better than the Toyotas but it has got problems the clio never had, which is worrying me and I have only done 400 miles - Peter from Bedfordshire
I have just part exchanged my Clio, it had 75,000 miles on it and makes some strange noises. I had exactly the same problem with the catch on my bonnet which also flew open when I was driving, and the clutch went not so long ago too. The central locking is tempremental and the radio has stopped working. It is 8 years old though (I bought it second hand) and I used it an awful lot, particularly on the motorway so I guess it needed some repairs due to wear and tear. Apart from the last couple of months, my Clio was fabulous. Reliable, comfortable, roomy, cheap and easy to run. I think it’s perfect for a run around car, I probably pushed it a little and have now gone for something more substantial to cope with the amount that I travel. It was my first car and after spending time and money getting it repaired, I know that I could have looked after it better which perhaps would have prevented the bonnet mishap. Would recommend for a learner/new driver or for someone who uses a car for school run/shopping/work. Lou Smith from Staffordshire
Submitted: 2009-12-26 | ID: 4135 | 1/10
![]()
Good to drive, more like a good car, nice to look at, if you have to drive a van then this is the one. First year: Quick shift packed up and it took 4 weeks to find out why under warranty. First MOT: New back dics required at 30000 miles. At 3 years and 3 months old having done 38000 miles I was faced with a £1200 bill for EGR valve, wiring loom repair & replacement injection computor all at once! Asked was it the injection pump but they did not like to say as they all go at 36000 approx! I ran Astra vans for 20 years without any problems, this new bigger van that I did need has disappointed me from a reliability point of view. The sad thing is that I do enjoy getting into the van when it is working.
Responses to this review
Hi Dave, I would be interested to know about the problem and remedy regarding your quickshift. I have an 08 that has had a prob from new, which the dealer is unable to fix - Malcy from Devon
Submitted: 2009-12-21 | ID: 4114 | 4/10
![]()
I bought this car from new. In the last year I have had nothing but electrical problems. I will never buy a Renault care ever again and I strongly advise all people to take heed. Last summer BOTH of my front electric windows failed and I had to replace their motors. One went then a month later the other . 720 pounds. then we had a little wire in the dash which operated the Air Conditioning and that caused smoking and burnt out. 526 pounds. Now my dashboard has completely died and I got conned into the 100 pound inherent problem that Watchdog found and Renault are not admitting to. Renault UK was not helpful at all. DONT BUY RENAULTS.
Submitted: 2009-12-17 | ID: 4107 | 1/10
![]()
Manual C’est superb, n’est pas? This Gallic supermini oozes chic, charm, and Parisienne punch. Elle va? Elle va va voom! Wrapped up in a smart and appealing designer bodyshell, the Renault Clio Sport diesel has piquancy in plenty and practicality in abundance, with all the flair one could wish from a French stylist and all the metric nous of clever French engineers. The lucky owner of this brand new automobile can enjoy the best that motoring can offer - secure in the knowledge that the affair will be a long lasting one: you can depend on it. More and more, the British motorist, in mourning for the lost national motor industry, is turning - not without envy - to our French friends across the Channel to plug the deficit. The French motor industry produces sound, stylish and, indeed, desirable motorcars embodying a cosmopolitan feel with a Republican disdain for snobbery. These are cars for the people: sensible people. People at liberty to choose for themselves. Sandwiched between the flashy, status obsessed, top end of the market and the - ’Mon Dieu! If only I had money to buy better than this’ - grimly utilitarian bottom end, the French motor industry displays a range of appealing automobiles for every taste, purpose and pocket. The present GT model is a prime example of that. Easily distinguished by its racy lines and 16" alloy wheels, side skirts, tinted windows and twin tailpipe exhaust, it’s targeted at the sportily inclined who like a little dash, a little flash, a little fun - but want to feel that they’re getting value for money, reliability and economy at the same time. The new Clio GT diesel zips into the frame with the breezy insouciance of an Impressionist seascape. On the inside, sporting details include drilled aluminium pedals, sports front seats and a leather trimmed GT steering wheel. It’s as bracing as ozone to take a turn behind the wheel - even on a soggy Saturday in Shrewsbury. To own this little beauty is an affair of the heart. Maigret would puff a pipe or two in contemplation of its alluring lines and nod appreciatively at the competent precision of its road manners and positive sense of direction. (Sat nav is integrated in this Tom Tom Edition). You don’t need to be a great detective to discover its abundance of attributes. The 106bhp diesel is one of the best around. Smooth, and with tractor like torque (240Nm at just 2000 rpm) the car ’feels’ quicker than it actually is. Top speed though is enough for anyone at near 120mph. Six well spaced gears encourage enjoyment and, as a consequence, I could not get anywhere near the claimed combined economy figure of 61.4mpg. 48mpg is what was recorded on the trip computer - but I say ’buy the 86bhp ’Ordinaire’ if you want to pussyfoot about’: this car is about FUN. And talking of ’fun’ I covered the secret A to B section of my Shropshire test route in just three minutes less than I had achieved in a test Maserati. All down to the torquey motor and inspirational handling born of ’programmed deflection torsion beams and the use of elasto-kinematic materials hard-wired to the moon etc..’ To you and me that means it handles and rides beautifully. Whilst pressing on at a cracking pace you are in a lovely, comfortable and quiet cabin listening to the quality sound system. If you’ve any sense at all, forget your baguettes and bag one of these. For modern driving it’s even better than a Bugatti. As my pal Le Chat Noir purred to me - "This Clio’s for miaow". If one was allowed these days, I’d be tempted to raise a glass of Beaujolais to this jolly Gallic jem. A car like this makes one feel a real Eurostar here...
Submitted: 2009-12-12 | ID: 4089 | 5/10
![]()
I bought a saloon 1600 dynamique April 2009 and have no complaints at all. Very well equipped, comfy, reasonable petrol consumption, excellent boot space, however, I started to see the odd coupe being driven about and kicked myself for not waiting, I always buy demonstrators or pre reg cars and there were none about in april. December 2009 traded my saloon for orange 1600 dynamique coupe. I love it, much prefer the firmer ride, looks great from any angle. Mine has dual climate control, panoramic sunroof and privilage alloys. These were all additions pre purchase. Next year i want a 2 litre turbo in white.
Submitted: 2009-12-12 | ID: 4087 | 5/10
![]()
I have had my scenic 1.6 for 8 years and am close to covering 154000 miles. It had done 44000 when I got it. I have found the car to be reliable, though I service it myself. I have had to change the cylinder head gasket twice in that time but I consider that to be expected for such mileage! I must agree that Renault garages vary immensely when it comes to helpful knowledge, but in defense of the car I find it the most comfortable car I have ever driven! I too have had to fix things like coils,rear bearings, brakes front and rear, cat three times, etc. But the strangest thing...the electrics have always worked fine!! O-Oh, maybe I shouldn’t have said that. In all honesty I would buy another one, though I have heard too many disturbing reports about the new electrical problems. Regards to all, and happy driving.
Submitted: 2009-12-11 | ID: 4071 | 4/10
![]()
Just coming up for it’s first service at 18000 miles and I am impressed, this van hasn’t missed a beat. I regularly get mid 30’s mpg of very mixed driving and I don’t take paricular care to be economical. A recent trip of 620 miles involving high cruising speeds, many steep hills over moorland and long traffic jams at motorway roadworks returned over 37 mpg which I consider to be excellent. It is quiet, comfortable, has enough space for my needs (including carrying the odd 8’ x 4’) is very easy to drive, has a great view of the road and will cruise effortlessly for hour after hour at relatively low revs. I have run vans for over twenty years and I can honestly say that buying this van was one of my more inspired moves! I would recommend it to anyone.
Responses to this review
I agree with you, amazing van, very comfy. I do over 50k a year and average 720 per tank even using the air con although I don’t hammer it, I normally cruise around 75mph on long runs. It’s a dream - Patrick Brennan from England
Mmmmm well enjoy it. It will not last. At 18,000 miles, cutting out problems. I had it a week, could not find fault and alarm going off. 40,000 miles - the seat worn out and slave cylinder, clutch etch. 70,000 miles - another slave cylinder, clutch and seat worn out. 100,000 - another slave cylinder and clutch. At 120,000 - another slave cylinder clutch. At 126,000 - another slave cylinder and fuel injector which goes back to cutting out problem at 18,000 miles. 127,000 - you guessed it, slave cylinder. Pure quality, it sounds like a bad movie. Will I buy again? Mmmmm, let me think...Noooo. Beware, these can be pigs. Just to say, main dealer serviced it regularly at 18,000 miles. Renault has said it is a manufacturing fault with slave cylinder, not my driving ohhhhhhhhh. It has been off the road for 12 weeks since Oct ’08. Once you have done 120,000 miles, let me know then. Has your’s had the modification done so the rain water does not leak onto the injectors? It’s a known fault. If not, get them to do it NOW! It will cause you problems down the road - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Three years on Ashley and not a single problem. I will be ordering the same model for delivery next year. Guess you just had a load of bad luck mate - Steve from England
Submitted: 2009-12-11 | ID: 4067 | 5/10
![]()
I am sat here writing this because the battery on my renault has failed again... This is the fifth time in two weeks. I won’t bother with listing the other problems I’ve had with it. I have always driven a renault but this is the worst car I have ever had the misfortune to own and along with almost everyone else on this site will never go near one again. Damned shame because they are great family cars in so many other ways.
Submitted: 2009-12-08 | ID: 4053 | 1/10
![]()
This is the worst vehicle I have ever come across, if I could give the mark as minus 10 stars I would. Where shall I start? Bought as a low mileage demo from some garage in Portsmouth, second day of ownership a piece of metal fell off from underneath the drivers side dashboard, had it refitted under warranty, it then fell off again a week later, left it off this time. Gearbox crashed after only 60,000 miles. And surprisingly it’s just about to crash again (120,0000). I have a theory on this as it appears to be the top shaft bearings in the box again, I reckon it’s not getting enough oil, I think the breather pipe spits out oil as well as air hence lowering the oil level in the box and it’s not getting to the bearings. I have had the cambelt snapped, 20,000 miles within recommend Renault service requirement, and yes the pistons meet the valves and made whoopy. Quoted £8000 for repair from Renault Carlisle, van value at time £4000 or less, declined their kind offer and fixed it for £480 doing it myself. Alternator packed up. Steering wheel came off in my hands, so beware. Now my favorite, the turbo packed in, it took a lot of money and time trying to track this one down especially as the turbo vacuum switch had packed up at the same time! MAF sensor, just the 4 so far the last one bought in France from Renault (£213) ouch! Brake discs front and back twice each, clutch master cylinder, I have clutch judder as I pull away so new clutch going in at the same time as the repair to the gearbox. But to be even handed I will say the o/side front indicator has never given any trouble!....Please don’t buy a Trafic, get something made in Germany.
Responses to this review
Interesting forum. A friend has just replaced the gearbox on her Trafic which had, surprise surprise, just done 60000m. She was told this was a known fault with Trafic/Vivaro/Primastar vans and it cost her £1800 to put right. We went to look at a Primastar on Thursday at a leasing company and they REFUSED to sell us the van. They had just spent £1780 on getting it through the MOT on fuel injectors, MAF sensor, and brakes. It came back from the MOT minus 6th gear and they reckoned it needed a new box. The mileage? 61400m!!! They lease vans to companies and reckon that out of every 10 pre 06 Trafics etc they lease 6 will develop gearbox faults just out of warranty at 3 years or 60000m. The fault lies with the clutch master cylinder leaking corrosive fluid into the box which gradually wears the teeth from 6th thru 5th and onwards. 07 van onwards have had this problem fixed but as the vans came out in 02 that means it took 5 years to fix!!!- Keith Livingstone from County Down
Mike, my, my you have had a stoke of bad luck with your Renault Trafic, this seems to be a regular occurance with Renault. I have a Renault Master which has caused some considerable stress over the last week as after 4 trips to Renault, my Master has been diagnosed with a doggy turbo - cost $6000 and they say that they can’t say that it will fix the problem as there may be something else too. Doesn’t distill any confidence in Renault here is Aus. I must add that your last comment about your o/s indicator did give my wife and I a much needed laugh after the stresses of this week with my Renault. We are in the process of deciding whether to trade in this piece of s**t and get soemthing more reliable and easier to service. GOOD LUCK WITH RENAULT!!!! - Richard Colton from Australia
Hi mate. thanks for all that info. I’ve got a 80 bhp Renault, the 5 gear one... I was getting worried if it is the 5 geared Trafics that have the gearbox problems... are you saying it hass been the 6 geared Trafics that have had all the troubles... anyone know if the 5 geared ones are ? And do I lose in the economy side of things - miles to gallon etc... Thanks - Daz Day from England
Submitted: 2009-12-08 | ID: 4048 | 1/10
![]()
I hope this is not the kiss of death but here goes! I, with great trepidation, I may add, bought my Megane 1.6 Dynamique Cabriolet about 5 weeks ago. Touch wood, there have been no glitches yet. I find that if you "do exactly as it says on the tin" she’s great, not a sports car but a nice driver though I do feel the steering to be bit strange after driving a 2002 Suzuki Alto. She’s reasonably nippy and averaging at about 38-40 MPG, for a petrol engine, It seems to be economical. My only gripe is that I find adjusting the seat height and leg room quite difficult, my head at times seeming to touch the roof despite the fact I’m only 5’6" and I can’t seem to get the lumber conrol just right which leaves my back a bit achy after a long trip. But so far I’m happy cruising along listening To the Searchers! At 56 all I can as you’re only old once!
Submitted: 2009-12-07 | ID: 4028 | 4/10
![]()
The car is ok but it does have its faults like the rear leg room is none existant. God knows why it’s in insurance group 10 because it does not feel like a sport with a speed of 100mph tops. Things to look for when buying: Check all eletrics! Checks all around drive shafts for grease, On the test drive listen for any knocks from c.v.
Responses to this review
You didn’t say what model Clio i.e. engine size you have, must be a 1.2 if the top speed is only 100mph? I had a 1999 Clio 16v 1.6 for 9 years and loved it to bits, so well balanced for size V performance V economy and I totally regret getting rid of it, have had 2 brand new Toyotas since and am so disappointed with everything about them. Stick to the Clio they are good cars to drive and are worth repairing when necessary - Pete from Bedfordshire
I completely disagree with Pete from bedfordshire about they are good cars!! My reveiw is 2 above this and I can’t stress enough, never buy a Renault because it WILL break your heart. Many of my friends got 02-03 clios or 02-03 Peugeot 206’s when they passed their test and every single one of them have had trouble with their clio’s, not the 206s. You hear many bad reports about 206’s and a mechanic told me himself as long as you take care of them they will go for ever (the 206’s), he also told me to get my head checked out because I bought a Renault. These were his exact words "If it wasn’t for Renault being such a pile of rubbish, I would have been out of business years ago". I think that says it all - Dean from County Tyrone
Dean, not everything is black and white. All I can say is that after having had 2 Renaults, the first one being a Renault 19 for 7 years which did have some problems with but only after 80K and they were wear and tear issues, and my Clio which I had for 9 years...and thrashed most of its life and misguidedly sold at 95K, they are a lot better than both brand new Toyotas which made my life a misery, believe me! But try telling a Toyota fan that they are crap and you will probably be put in your place. Every one I know has good and bad things to say about their cars and yes Renault’s have had and still do have their issues BUT the Clio I had was spot on, especially for the price, I paid new £10000 in 1999. Also the fuel economy for a 1.6 was far better than the Fiesta 1.6 I have now (and like) yet the Clio was much more fun and faster. I have also spoken to mechanics, my cousin is one and on balance they are good cars to own with the odd rogue but you can get that with any make - Pete from Bedfordshire
Submitted: 2009-12-07 | ID: 4026 | 3/10
![]()
I wouldn’t recommend anyone to buy a Renault. Everyone I know with a Scenic has electrical problems amongst a long list of other items! My car has been stalling regularly. The garage couldn’t find what was causing it, having replaced the battery and given it a service. The car started stalling again a day after leaving the garage and is now on my drive and won’t start. The electric roof hasn’t worked for 4 years, one of the rear seats won’t go down. I hate it and can’t wait to get another non-french car.
Responses to this review
Hiya, I had the same problem and took it to an electrician that I use, he told me it wasn’t electrical but a rubber pipe on the engine managment system, which he changed and it runs great now. This pipe is situated under the top right hand side of the engine compartment - John from Lancashire
Submitted: 2009-12-05 | ID: 4023 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my CC in 06, one year old from Renault, Penarth Road. I have kept up a full service record on it and on 3 occasions while being serviced asked the dealership to check for any roof leaks, as I was having a lot of moisture in the car regardless of the weather conditions. Each time I was informed that there was no leak’s. The Winter was the worst time, having to scrape ICE off the inside of all windows a daunting task at 4a.m. before driving to work. The Summer was embarrasing getting into a steamed up car after parking it for a few hours while shopping or being at work. I could only put it down to some damp air getting into the car some how, as the Professionals(?) at Renault said there was no evidence of water ingress. 6 months before the waranty ran out I took it to SR BABBER, Tonypandy after finding the boot contained at the least a gallon or two of water. The garage informed me I must have used too much water washing it?!. I came back from a holiday on 9th. Nov this year only to find My rear seat’s and back rest soaked. I removed the rear seat to find two inches of water sloshing around. I spent a week trying to dry it out but to no avail and then bit the bullet and booked it in to Renault Cardiff,sweet joy.., £90 per hour labour, you can fly to the Canaries twice for that from Bristol. The final bill was £801.27p. No replacement seals were used in the making of this bill only one tube of SILICONE. To add insult to injury when I got into my still steamed up car on the fore court I found the seat back still soaking wet, the base seat was at home. I spoke with the Service Manager(?) and pointed out the problem asking him if his team did joined up thinking and could they not have dried the car at the same time? He just got a lad from the workshop and told him to suck out as much water as he could, no real regret as to his departments poor service. I am now in the process of making a formal complaint to Renault UK about the poor service and what I believe to be a manufacturing fault with the Megan CC roof construction. I love the 2 cars in one concept of the CC but Renault should do something about these defects, as they have been aware of it since the car was launched..
Responses to this review
My partner bought a 2005 model from Renault Croydon and from new had Water Ingress issues from the roof, even Renault replaced all the seals (in bodyshop at London West for the whole of June 2009) but this did not resolve the issues. The response from Bodyshop Mgr was that it was "repaired to Renault’s specification ....and performs as per manufacturers expectations." Heaven help all those with a Megane Coupe-Cabriolet!! Within 4 weeks and with the use of the roof with the little Summer Sun the leaks, sorry Water Ingress varied from side to side. In late Aug 2009 we went back into the dealership for further repairs and even to date we still have not got car back..Dec 09. Now Legal Action pending as it is not fit for purpose.......watch this space !!??
I bought the Meganne cabriolet 05 plate May last year from a Renault dealer and within days it has never been out of the workshop for my ’imagined’ water pouring in.. oops sorry water ingress. All seals have been replaced, special sealant has been applied etc, etc, etc. They say it never leaked when on their forecourt, however, the seats (leather) were covered in water streaks when I took possesion. This SHOULD have given me a clue. The windows steam up in all weather and the winter saw it frozen from the inside!! They think I am lying despite photos and driving it into their shop when it was pouring in. Eight months down the line I am no further forward with my complaint. I either accept a lesser car costing a lot less (ie. I lose almost £4,000) or allow them to AGAIN keep the car until they find the fault.. Someone give me a clue to our legal rights here, this car is not ’fit for purpose’ yet I feel like the one in the wrong. They won’t consider giving me my money back - Ann Irwin from NorthumberlandI have also had "water ingress" problems. My ’56 model was purchased from the Renault "Motorline" dealership in Ashford Kent in February 09 with an extended warranty. We found out later that this didn’t include leaks. I enjoyed the car through the summer but a small leak appeared on the driver’s side in October. It went back to the dealers to be investigated and it can back..after we paid a bill of £400+ with both sides leaking but not with a small leak but with a flood. Two more extended stays in the garage later and a further £150+ lighter the car appears to be leak free...at present. We were promised a complete valeting to remove the wter stains from the upholstery but this didn’t happen. The man on the service desk was very rude and off hand when the car was collected. A letter of complainted was sent to the Manager of the dealership and to date, two months later we have received no response to our complaints - Annemarie Bolt from Kent
Just been reading your report. Like you I was amazed at the £90 per hour charge at the Penarth road dealership. I have a 1.9 DCI Megane Dynamique brought from new in 2003. Biggest motoring mistake of my life. The water ingress is a common fault with these cars, perhaps one should say design fault; nearly every day I have to wipe the condensation from the inside of the car to make it possible to see. Often the drivers side door compartment is full of water. Many others have complained about this. In 2007 I had the service light come on and it came up with ’injection fault’. This needed a new glow plug to be fitted, grand total for this in Cambridge was just under £50. Had a call from the Cardiff dealership, exactly the same fault (another design one according to the guys in Cambridge) and the cost is just under £140. Rip off merchants indeed. I will be taking my receipt copy along with me this afternoon to demand why it is nearly three times the cost. I have learnt many valuable lessons, one of which is do not buy another Renault - Graham Evans from Cardiff
Stuart you need to write to the man in charge in Renault Cardiff chris.williams@renault.co.uk. I am in the process of a complaint at the moment and have customer service involved as well. You want any help drop me an email at welshstrongbow@googlemail.com i would be glad to help where possible - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Submitted: 2009-12-03 | ID: 4005 | 4/10
![]()
This is a 160,000 mile car bought by my stepson for 890 quid and I have had the dubious pleasure of trying to fix the heater, which does not work. I’ve fitted a new thermostat with no luck. I’ve given it a flush through with no Luck. I’ve checked for air locks with no luck. I guess it’s the matrix, and that will be a pig of a job. Working on this car is a nightmare, you can’t get to anything and you just feel that whatever you do will probably just cause a mirriad of other problems. Buy a Toyota or if thats too boring for you buy a classic car that you can fix yourself!
Responses to this review
Hi Andy, try taking out the dashboard heater control panel, it is not much of a hassle, just a couple of screws and remove the ash tray. If it has one for access to these screws (phillips head) then gently pull it forwards, check the wire on the heater control knob, it is a piano type wire that has a tendency to bend back on its self instead of operating the heater valve. If this is the case you can straighten it with a pair of long nose pliers (very carefully) then put some grease on it, work it into the outer cable with the control knob. Job done. There is no need to disconnect the outer cable from the panel as this can be done in-situ. I did mine with the same problem (no heat). But I must tell you that I was a mechanic for forty years. Hope this helps, let me know - Jim Rawlinson from Lancashire
Submitted: 2009-11-30 | ID: 3990 | 1/10
![]()
A fabulous car in every respect. On long trips it averages nearly 68 mpg and it pulls like a train!!!!!
Submitted: 2009-11-24 | ID: 3949 | 5/10
![]()
I bought my from new in 2007. I absolutely love it, but am concerned that whenever I have a problem, the local dealer can’t find it. They reset the computer, which is usually fine, but within 5 minutes into my journey to work in the morning I experienced a jolt, like the car had jumped up a gear and it became a bit sluggish. The message on the computer screen showed ’check gearbox’. This has happened at least 7 times recently and each time it does I have to pull over to switch off the engine and restart it to clear the problem. It happened again today. My only option is to leave my car with with the dealer over night so someone can drive it the following morning, but who’s to say it will happen when they drive it? Any one had a similar problem?
Responses to this review
The update: The problem was a faulty valve in the gearbox, which could have been extremely expensive if the car wasn’t under warranty - Rosina from Hertfordshire
Submitted: 2009-11-20 | ID: 3920 | 5/10
![]()
I ordred my van on the 2nd June 2009 from AUTOWORLD Wolverhampton and was told it was made in Luton (British jobs etc..) with a delivery date of mid July-early August so decided to wait for 1st september for 59 reg. called AUTOWORLD mid August to be told the French are on shutdown for all of August ! The salesman lied through his teeth about it being built in Luton as all high roof models are built by Renault in France. called the lying salesman early September and AUTOWORLD could not find any record of my van or when it might arrive. Mid September I called Renault U.K. and there was still no record of my order. So at the end of September I cancelled my order and bought a Citroen! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it !!! p.s. Very happy with the Citroen.
Responses to this review
I wouldn’t have bought a citreon, wait until it starts to go wrong and the dealer can’t fix it - Neil Dixon from Durham
So they told you it was made in Luton, do you still believe in Father Christmas too? - Connie Edwards from England
Low roof, short wheelbase Trafics are built in Luton - Martin from Hertfordshire
Submitted: 2009-11-14 | ID: 3882 | 1/10
![]()
I love my Megane was an absolute steal when I bought it earlier this year only £1500. Drives great, cheap to run, interior is great doesn’t show it’s age at all! I haven’t had to do a thing to it only thing I’ve changed was the timing belt and water pump as recommended. The dealer also did the accessory belt and coils at no extra charge. The car has really been a joy to own and I will probably be buying another Renault when I’m ready to replace!
Responses to this review
Hello, I test drove a Megane 1.4 55 plate (£5000) on saturday and wanted something with a little more pull, I also tried to open the sunroof and it wouldn’t close again, eek! Is this a common problem with these? I have my heart set on the Megane and have therefore booked a test drive with another Megane 1.6 this week. I told the man in the garage i was after a slightly bigger engine and fair do’s he’s got back to me with this one. (£3500) ~ Do you think this is a good price? Sort of making me wonder why its much cheaper?? It’s slightly older than the first one I drove but still has a sunroof/alloys. Sorry to chew your ear off but just wanted some advice really. Thank u for reading ;) - Danielle Bradshaw from Wales
I love my 52 red Cabriolet. Roof no problem but I need one with a hard top now, I will weep to PX it this month and am probably stupidly going for another Megane, the new Hatch this time. And of course it is red. They are just such lovely whizzy cars. So if you want to upgrade in style you know where to look - Dinah Parker from Kent
Submitted: 2009-11-14 | ID: 3881 | 5/10
![]()
I really like this car for the most part and it’s enoyable to drive and great for the larger family. I do agree with others about it being heavy on front tyres though! However, I have problem with the PK type gearbox on my Espace 1.9 DCi. Specialists say it’s common, Renault do not. Is your gearbox a PK type do you know?? I’m trying to prove to Renault how common the fault is! Any comments can be sent to pkgearboxfault@hotmail.com please get all who have suffered to send details here as i require the evidence to help prevent others facing these huge repair bills.
Submitted: 2009-11-14 | ID: 3876 | 3/10
![]()
Great car until you have to fix a problem. Renault just don’t care. I was a sked to leave it for a few days (5th time) as the air conditioning was leaking yet when I got the car back I had exactly the same problem only a day or two later. Even the car dealer says "it’s a Renault, what do I expect"!! Never go to Renault if you can avoid it. Take my advise and go German!
Submitted: 2009-11-12 | ID: 3862 | 1/10
![]()
Fantastic! Love my Renault Megane Sport Hatch! This is a great car with top of the range spec. Air con, alloys, nice metalic finish and cruise control make this a really high quality car. It’s also got a great style that still looks fresh and more thoughtful than almost any other car on the road. The best bit is how this car drives; it takes country lanes in it’s stride, rounding bends and charging up hills with ease, motorway driving is a doddle (especially if you just stick on the cruise control) and handling about town is fine. There’s a new model out now, without the stand out rear end of this one, but if you can pick up a used model go for it - you won’t regret it!
Submitted: 2009-11-06 | ID: 3835 | 5/10
![]()
I looked at this site before we bought our Megane cc and it did put some thoughts in my mind but we bought one anyway and it’s spot on. I would also recommend buying the 1.9 diesel as it gives economy and performance.
Submitted: 2009-11-06 | ID: 3832 | 4/10
![]()
This is the best vehicle I have ever had in 40 years. Im a pro Musician and took out all the back 5 seats from day one to carry my equipment. In just over 2 years I have not had a single fault. It cruises the motorways all day at over 33mpg and that’s with an auto box. The O.E.M. Michelin pilots lasted over 30,000 miles. I’ve always recieved very good service from Renault Oldham. Another 10 months and I will definitly buy a new Espace.
Responses to this review
Hi As I’ve always used a Renault Trafic converted day van I decided to use the Espace and convert it to a day van with its comfortable interior and economical fuel usage; 70 miles on a tenner of pertrol at 60mph combined motorway and local roads. The only problem I have is that every now and then I get a smell of petrol in the cab. No one seems to know where it comes from and with no leaks found enginewise the dealers are baffled. I have been told the fuel tank has a breather filter system next to the tank. All I get from the mechanics is "get rid" as they are a problem car. Mine is a 1994 model. Help! - Kevin Cocker from Lancashire
Submitted: 2009-11-04 | ID: 3830 | 5/10
![]()
Hi all. I’m a young South African individual and I have had this car for close to a year. I own the 1.9 DCi full spec with the leather and all the bells and whistles, which I bought second hand with low mileage. The car is in an all around brilliant condition, however, I have replaced my clutch, suffered with "Injection Fault" and have had to change the crank pulley as well amongst numerous other things. Now I don’t know what this will convert into as far as UK currency is concerned but I have spent no less than R25,000 south african rands (Hard earned) on repairs for this car. I love the performance and asthetics, however they are not enough when it comes to going for a reliable car, I think it’s safe to say I’ll be sticking to VW/Audi from now on.
Submitted: 2009-11-03 | ID: 3823 | 1/10
![]()
What a motor! What a bargain! The colour is Ruby Red metallic set off by silver roof arches: black leather with white stitching: cruise control: speed limiter: Jarsalle alloys: reversing sensors: Q3 paint treatment... and all for under £16k brand new on a ’59 plate. Yes, it’s now a run-out model but who cares? She, ’Ruby’ of course, is a real head turner either with the roof up or down and so different from the usual black/quartz/silver you so often see! Downsides?.. well, this is not a car you buy with "eyes wide shut" is it? After all, the body flexing or ’scuttle shake’ helps cause the various squeaks and rattles which come as standard on any cabriolet. The ride quality will always be compromised because of this. No spare wheel? a common weight/space saving idea within the motor industry but the Megane CC really should have had one. Don’t moan about it, take more care over your purchase next time! I hope to order a spare from an independent source and I’ll let you know how I get on. My stepdaughter lives in Andorra so I cannot wait to use the cruise on the French A20. Mmmm! Yes there are faults, but no car is perfect. HAPPY MOTORING!!
Responses to this review
Hi, I had the same worries as I do a lot of motorway driving. My solution was to buy a fullsize alloy wheel off E-Bay and got rid of the boot liner. I then made up a new liner (in two parts) made from plywood and covered it in matching carpet fabric. I have lost abot 20% of the boot space as a result but I am much happier knowing that I can change the wheel if I have to. I have also kept in the boot the foam filler, just in case. Total cost about £70.00 Hope this helps - Graham Freeth from Warwickshire
Submitted: 2009-10-27 | ID: 3775 | 4/10
![]()
I was travelling down a clear road with no traffic or people when the glass top exploded leaving glass on both my wife and myself. I returned the car to F Cross Scunthorpe who made out we were lying as this had never happened before. I had to claim on insurance and also found out on-line there have been several happenings like this.
Responses to this review
This has happened twice on my Megane cc. The small rear passenger near side just exploded one day when we were taking the shopping out. We had it replaced. Then a few months later my car was in Renault Cardiff (again) being repaired and they phoned me and told me they had to replace the off side rear passenger window as it just exploded for no reason. ??? - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Submitted: 2009-10-22 | ID: 3756 | 4/10
![]()
I have the 57 plate Trafic van, 34000 miles and it needs a new clutch. The slave cylinder has been fixed under warranty but I was then told that the new clutch would cost me £1052. Nothing but trouble.
Responses to this review
Why not to try Sale of Goods Act? The clutch, slave cylinder and hydraulic unit seems to not lasting reasonably long enough - Ray Dublin from Ireland
Submitted: 2009-10-21 | ID: 3748 | 1/10
![]()
Hi everyone! Unlike other reviewers I have had no problems with my cabrio. It is a constant joy to drive and still a head turner.
Submitted: 2009-10-20 | ID: 3742 | 5/10
![]()
I have bought a Renault Scenic in January 2008 from a local garage in Northern Ireland. My first problem came in September 2008 and I have had problems ever since. I am annoyed and do not know who to turn to. Can you assist me and tell me were I can report to with my complaint. My email is ruth15455@hotmail.co.uk
Submitted: 2009-10-16 | ID: 3730 | 1/10
![]()
I bought this car ex demo and have usual complaint about the leaking roof. I love the car to drive and of course its looks. I’m trying to find out about replacing wing mirror assembly cover glass. Of course paint and labour charge from dealer is £270.
Submitted: 2009-10-16 | ID: 3722 | 3/10
![]()
As I own a sign company, the only down side to the long wheel base is that it won’t just take a 10ft board without having one of the rear doors open a little, it could do with being a bit longer. Apart from that the van has been a pleasure to drive, it has been reliable, economical & looks great. I had a good deal when I bought it new, the electric windows & air con are a must, I would recommend the van to anyone. I have heard from a couple of my customers that they have had problems with the gear boxes on their Trafic / Vivaro that have cost them a small fortune to replace. I’m not sure if this is a common fault, would appreciate feedback from anyone with same story.
Responses to this review
Mine is just going in for clutch slave cylinder under warranty. Great I thought, then they told me new I need a new clutch costing £1052. Nothing but problems from new 57 plate, 34000 miles. Renault do not want to know - Duncan Stephen from Worcestershire
Hi mate. The gearbox problems with these vans are common because the oil sump is far too small so it is advised to change the gearbox oil far more frequently than usual - Mark from Pembrokeshire
I have a problem with the OPK type gearbox on my Espace 1.9 DCi. Specialists say it’s common, Renault do not. Is your gearbox a PK type do you know?? I’m trying to prove to Renault how common the fault is! Any comments can be sent to pkgearboxfault@hotmail.com please get all who have suffered to send details here as i require the evidence to help prevent others facing these huge repair bills please help! - Stuart Tite from Northamptonshire
If your van is still under warranty get the gears checked, our Renault’s gears started jumping out of gear back into neutral after 25 000 - 30 000 miles!! It is a very common problem with Renault. We had our gear box replaced 1 month before our 3 year warranty expired!!!! Renault picked up the bill!! Look at any forum for Reanult, don’t leave it, you will be sorry!! - Wendy from England
Submitted: 2009-10-12 | ID: 3708 | 5/10
![]()
Excellent small (?) car with plenty of storage lockers and loads of space (with or without the rear seats in place. Very economical whether solo (50mpg average) or towing our 1000kg caravan around Italy, France and Spain (around 30mpg). The high profile of the Scenic allows excellent views of the surrounding countryside as well as helping the aero-dynamics of car and caravan. Take care to remember you’ve got a caravan behind you when you’re breezing along. Apart from that "dodgy supermarket diesel" causing a £200 breakdown on the M25 and an annoying seatbelt sensor wire we have been pleased with its reliability. Couple of niggles. The steel spare wheel became loose several times!!! (studs supplied are for alloy wheels and steel wheels have a different profile). The ride we’d describe as too firm for Norfolk’s poorly maintained pot holes.
Submitted: 2009-10-09 | ID: 3698 | 4/10
![]()
I bought my Megane new in 04. Recently I noticed the roof was leaking on the passenger side. I booked the car into a dealership in Feb, however was subsequently told that they couldn’t find the leak and that if I wanted them to look into it further I would have to pay almost £200?? Subsequently the leak got worse and I booked the car into the same dealership (mistake I know!) they have now told me that I need a new roof seal, and the roof needs re-aligning at a grand total of £900!! I am waiting on a second opinion from another dealership. Has anyone else had these problems or experienced poor service from Renault UK?
Responses to this review
This could be your problem if your carpets are soaking, push your knuckels hard down on the floor behind the seats and see if water rises to the surface. I purchased my car second user in April 2007, it was 18 months old. A couple of months after I had the car I was leaning across the back seats to get something and put my hand down to support myself and noticed the floor was soaking, the water was coming up through the carpet. So as it was still covered by warranty I called my nearest renault garage (Cardiff) and booked it in. They had it for a week and phoned me up and said they could not find any leaks. So a couple of months later when we had another downpoar I checked the back floor and it was soaking wet again. I phoned Renault Cardiff again they said they were aware of a problem now with the roof seals and booked it in again on 23rd October 2008. We had the car back and the roof was rattling like hell and on the next big downpoar the floor was still soaking but by now the warranty had ran out. My wife phoned cardiff and she was asked is she parking it on a hill and she is washing the car too much. As it was, Renault Customer service texted my wife asking if was she happy with the service. To which she replied no and told them about the problems and that they should have done a good job and they should guarantee their work. We were told they would look into it, after months upon months of us phoning customer services, as they were not getting back to us, we finally had our car booked in on Friday 18th september 2009 whilst we were going away on holidays for a week. We had a phone call in Spain on the monday telling us that customer service had okayed the work. We came back on the following Sunday and I phoned Renault Cardiff the next day to arrange pick up of my car, to which they replied we are still waiting for customer service to get back to us to see who is going to pay for the work as it was not a manufacture problem. I quizzed this and they said that under the windscreen wiper motor cover that runs along the bottom of the windscreen there is a hole either side which drains the water off down to the floor. These 2 holes had become blocked with debris over a length of time and the water was building up in the trough and there is a plastic letterbox type air intake which the water was pouring down into the car. I explained that this must have been the problem all the time and it had been missed the other 2 occasions it went in, the only reason the fitter in Renault found the fault this time was that when he drove the car in, stopped suddenly, and found that his foot was wet by the pedals. This, in my opinion, is a bad design as the fitters did not even know about these holes, so how am I supposed to know they are there, and if they get blocked up like they did the easiest for the water to go is in the car. If this problem was found the first time then there would not have been a bill for £2811.40 now. Customer Services are saying it is not a design fault and that they are willing, as a token of good gesture, to pay 50% of the cost to sort the problem out. I now have What Car Magazine chasing it up for me. If they get no joy then I think Watchdog will be getting a call from me - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Thank you, thank you, Terry Jones, I have been going out of my mind thinking I am the only person with this problem after my local Renault dealership has told me it is unique to me. My car is currently in bits at the Renault garage still full of water, everything has been affected by the water and we are being faced with a two possibly three thousand pound bill. We have had our Domonique coupe 18months from new, so yes, still under warranty. Totally unacceptable Renault - Ian Cunningham from Yorkshire
From Mackay - Australia Hi guys (Terry & Ian), thank God I found your blog: me too I was turning mad looking for the leakage in my 2005 cabriolet 2L Exeption, and as a matter of fact the leak come from the front under the wipers motor cover as you described it; I found the little holes, obviously far too small and easily clogged up; the next problem arising with the water or the humidity is a short circuit on the electronic system: I lost the wipers command, I do not know if it is coming from the winscreen wipers motor or from the black handle near the sterring wheel; anyway I am stuffed till the far end, as in Australia no-one knows about Renault (except in the big cities, miles away from where I live); the dealer was a nightmare of incomptence, I show him how to turn off the little flashing wrench for the service and so many other stories. I can’t believe I kept this car for 5 years... Anyway I going to trade it (the remnants) for the new Mercedes E cabriolet. Thanks again mates for sharing your stories. Charles from Australia
Submitted: 2009-10-09 | ID: 3683 | 3/10
![]()
My Modus has done 43,000 miles and gone through 8 coil packs. Then the cam belt went - £ to sort this out. It’s only 4 years old. Great car, apar from the dodgy 1.4 engine. No more Renault’s for me...
Submitted: 2009-10-08 | ID: 3678 | 2/10
![]()
I bought my Renault, and after having it less than 6 months the toxic fuel light came on. I took it to Renault main dealers who advised me to have a 120 point service and the fault would be flushed out. I did this at a cost of over £400 and 3 weeks later guess what? The toxic fuel light came back on. Took it back to Renault and they advised that they would take a look at it for me, the engineer wanted a further £1,200 to rectify, but hey I am thinking I thought the service was meant to rectify this... I went for a second opinion, I should add Renault wouldn’t release my car until I paid an extra £300 for them to put it back together, and got a chip replaced at another garage for £80. End of the story... no way... my car loses complete power when I am driving it for no reason, over revs when it is stationary... doesn’t start first time... leaks through the door seals... and every garage I take it too tells me something different. I have had all the coils replaced, spark plugs, the list goes on and still after spending x amount of pounds on this heap of ****. I am now seriously considering writing a strongly worded letter to Renault UK... knowing before I have put pen to paper it will not acheive what it is meant to, just like this stupid car. Anyone who is remotely considering buying a renault, do yourself a favour and DON’T!
Responses to this review
There is not much to say. I bought a Megane in 2005 and ever since I have been facing trouble. The lesson I have learnt is ’Never go for another Renault - what ever it is’ - V V from Mid-Lothian (Edinburghshire)
Submitted: 2009-10-08 | ID: 3673 | 1/10
![]()
Don’t touch Renault Megane’s. Mine is a 1.9 dci, nothing but problems all the time, the garage has had it more than I have. They are very poorly made cars: check injection, engine rattles, electric windows stop working, brakes fade plus calipers rattle, up to every 1000 miles burns a litre of oil, uses a lot of fuel, turbos blow up on low mileage.
Responses to this review
Same here. Got an 05 plate 1.9DCI. Dashboard blown, turbo blown. Cam pulleys wearing out. Check injection fault, wipers dont clean the window. Total piece of cr*p...never buy Renault - John Mac from Derbyshire
Submitted: 2009-10-08 | ID: 3672 | 1/10
![]()
Bought the van in may and have covered 6000 miles to date. Bought it mainly because we bought a Trafic van 3 years ago which has proved a good buy. All 3 drivers/family members like the van and it has proved economical/reliable/ and easy to drive. Only mystery is why we never see other new Kangoo’s on our travels?
Responses to this review
Same as you, love the van. Most people don’t know what it is because they have not caught on here. Everywhere in France, must be the No.1 van in France at the moment - Alex Artson from England
Submitted: 2009-10-07 | ID: 3667 | 5/10
![]()
Bought this car for my wife who loves it. Started leaking driver side and then passenger side. Taken to Renault Hawick under warranty several times but they could not fix it. They said "It’s the way the car is designed." Seriously! Eventually took it to Renault in Edinburgh who fitted new seals and adjusted the front windows and cured the problem. This is a known fix for leaks. Apart from the annoyance with the leak and particularly the Hawick dealership this is a great car.
Responses to this review
Hello Norman, on reading your review and many more!! May I ask were the seals apparently from the 2007 modification to these seals? Thank you for your advise, look forward to hearing from you. I love my car!!! Karen Whittaker from Cambridgeshire
Submitted: 2009-10-07 | ID: 3663 | 5/10
![]()
The air bag warning light and the service light keeps coming on. Keep away from all Renault cars and vans...
Responses to this review
I had the same problem with my Vivaro, it turned out to be all the crap I had stuffed under the seats interferring with the seat belt warning sensor - Keith from England
Submitted: 2009-10-05 | ID: 3659 | 2/10
![]()
My wife and I bought our Megane CC Privilege in March this year (09) as we were told the prices would rocket in the Spring/early Summer. Unfortunately, we purchased the car without having someone look over it first. After a couple of weeks we found that the nearside front strut was completely shot and the top of the wheel was moving in and out about two inches. After a bit of ’negotiation’ I managed to get it fixed on the three month warranty the vehicle came with. Everything seemed OK for a while but then a loud ’tapping’ started coming from the rear nearside quarter/parcel shelf. As yet I have not been able to rectify this. The newest problem we have had is, we dropped the roof down a couple of weeks ago and the rear offside window went down about two inches, after pulling all the windows up on the centre console switch, this window stayed where it was. We put the roof back up, the window stayed where it was again. We could not go out in the car as we could not leave it with a window open. Managed to temporarily rectify this by removing a battery terminal hoping to re-set the system. Neither the driver’s door or panel switches work for this window, it only works with console switches. I was told a new "computer’ for the window would be £200 plus. It is a shame that these cars have these faults as ours, with the 1.9Dci engine, drives really well and has a lot of power. We are currently averaging 60+mpg on a run out but worried about putting the roof down because of the window problem and hoping the loud tapping noise doesn’t start as it annoys the hell out of me!
Responses to this review
We had the same problem and Renault paid two thirds of the cost, we only paid £80 to get the window problem fixed - Emma Newton from Lincolnshire
I have a Renault Dynamique cc 07. I also have the leaky roof problem on passenger side. It was solved very simply by applying vaseline to the seal between windscreen and roof this creates a waterproof seal. Reapply after carwash. Hope this is of some help - Dermot Burke from Ireland
Submitted: 2009-09-30 | ID: 3644 | 3/10
![]()
I bought a second hand Renault cab- 51 plate... no leaks so far! Despite washing the car with lots of water on the roof.... still nothing. Only gripe is, the steering fluid is leaking somewhere, will get it fixed soon. Other then that its a great car, and a head turner!
Responses to this review
Yeah you’re right, this year and model of cab is great looking and drives very nice too, also no leaks, but if you have any info as to how to make the back window clear with what ever solution I can use on it this would be realy helpful - Ian Pleasant from Northumberland.
Submitted: 2009-09-30 | ID: 3643 | 4/10
![]()
This is my second Renault after 30 years of MG Rover and others. I find the standard of finish on the new car is excellent, as was the older 86 bhp shake your ass shape. The standard extras are brilliant - cruise, speed limit, auto lights, wipers to name but few. And the engine power is good, the extra 20 horses make a big difference. Cheap tax is another bonus. But most of all I can’t praise highly enough the service of the local Renault Dealer in Birmingham. I had a slight problem with the old car after warranty expired; they made good the problem with no charge!! The new car shape is pleasing to the eye and it drives very well. If I could improve anything it would be the 6 speed gearbox, I’m getting too old for all the gear changing. OVERALL I WOULD RATE THIS CAR AS FIVE STAR + it has only done 1,100 miles so the fuel consumption has not reached the advertised levels but it still returns 46 to a gallon around town. Hope that helps.
Submitted: 2009-09-28 | ID: 3625 | 5/10
![]()
WARNING: Complete and utter PILE OF S***E!!! Never ever buy one of these, a waste of my hard earned money. I had a Peugeot 307 HDi before this and it was twice the car the Megane is. I always had a Peugeot and they are excellent, I’m seriously thinking of changing this for a new 308. Renault customer service is useless. NEVER BUY RENAULT!!!!
Submitted: 2009-09-28 | ID: 3622 | 1/10
![]()
I’ve never had a Renault before. I have been driving for 22 years and nothing can compair to the standard and gizmos; they are simply brilliant!! Air con, speed limiter, cruise control, auto lights, auto windscreen wipers, keyless entry - no more fumbling for keys - and the best gizmo has to be the bluetooth, no more messing around with head sets. With the sports kit that came with the World Series Edition (Dynamique) it look the biz too. Love all the space and places to put the kids bits and bobs, shopping etc. Simply fantastic!!!!
Responses to this review
The owners manual recommend main dealer for changing light bulbs, at £100 a time. That’s in the region of £800 for changing light bulbs over say a 3 year period. That’s some ’cost of ownership’ model. Renault UK did provide some compensation towards this, but stated that it had been designed like this due to safety crumple zones at the front! TOSH! Driving without working lights at night is dangerous and an offence. If my wife has to find a Renault main dealer to change a light bulb on a weekend to be able to use the vehicle then in my book it’s not fit for purpose - David Mason from Yorkshire
Re: lights. This problem was on the previous model range which is as different as chalk is to cheese. Having owned both, the new Megane is in another world in all departments I would recommend not knocking it till you’ve tried it ;-) - Jimmy H from Ayrshire
Submitted: 2009-09-23 | ID: 3606 | 5/10
![]()
Bought the car second-hand 2 years ago. I can’t fault it. Comfortable, spacious and very economical (averages around 56 mpg). Whilst I would much prefer to buy a British car, sadly this is no longer possible. Of all the imported cars I would certainly buy another Scenic. Top marks.
Responses to this review
I take it that you work for Renault? I bought a 04 megane 2 years ago and have spent some serious money on a bundle of scrap !!! NEVER BUY RENAULT AGAIN - Ian Rolleston from County Down
Submitted: 2009-09-14 | ID: 3559 | 5/10
![]()
Bought my 55 plate CC in January 2009..When I first had it the alarm would activate for no reason and usually in the early hours. It was like having a new born baby. I overcame this problem by isolating the interior sensors by pressing the stop / start button 5 times after I had turned off the engine. The other issue is that the roof leaks but this changes depending on when the roof was lowered; sometimes the left side will leak and then the right but only a drip. Overall I’m pleased with it.
Responses to this review
My car has gone into Renault twice to stop a leak on both sides, they stopped it on the passenger side but the driver side is still leaking. The warranty has run out so I contacted Renault head office customer services and they said that Renault Cardiff have told them that it is not a manufacture problem but leaves blocking somewhere and are looking to charge me £500 not happy at all - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
An update to the last post. Renualt Cardiff decided that the electrics were contaminated and gave me a quote of £3300. My insurance company would not cover it but I managed to get them down to £2811. If they would have sorted the leak out the first time we would not be where we are now. I have been without my car for 4 weeks now - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Submitted: 2009-08-28 | ID: 3498 | 4/10
![]()
RENAULT SCENIC II 1.6 authentic comf 5 door 2004 faulty? Check emmisions fault plus motor symbol and odometer reading extra kilometers now instrument panel is dead and car is cutting out when idling. This is the worst car I have purchased in my life and will never ever buy a French car again and will be certainly telling everyone I know about the problems I’ve had.
Responses to this review
I agree entirely. I have a 54 Scenic 1.6 VVT - pile of c**p that is always going wrong with electrical faults. Wish I bought a C-Max! - Nick from Devon
I totally agree with you guys. I bought my 54-plate 1.6 Scenic Rush VVT in February 09. It was trouble free until October 09 then required: a new battery, new coils and now....apparently the motorized throttle Pot is going to cost me 350 pounds to replace as the without this the pile of rubbish will keep cutting out!! I wish I’d kept my Focus! - John Love from Lanarkshire
I’ve got a 2005 model, which I’ve had for 5 months and already I’ve had to replace the dashboard electrics due to it going dead with only 14k on the clock. Now the check emmisions warning has come on. What the hell’s this for? Told by Renault they would do a diagonostic check for £20 and then tell me how much it will cost to repair; they already know the fault!! I had a ford galaxy for 7 years and never had a problem. This is the first and last Renault!- Craig from Staffordshire
I’m in the same boat and have spend hundreds and still no closer to finding the fault. My car will not idle - Amanda from Essex
Submitted: 2009-08-28 | ID: 3491 | 1/10
![]()
I feel very disappointed in my Scenic 1.9dci. I have had this vehcle from new. It has had a few problems with the electrics but the car has been quite reliable up until 3 months ago when I had a major rattle in the engine. I then had to pay £82 for the privelege for the dealer to tell me that the bearings on the crankshaft are going and with 62,000 miles on the clock and being only four and a half years old, I feel this is a major fault on the engine and have heard of other vehicles having this same problem. A big thumbs down for Renault reliability!!!!!!!!!! Both dealer and Renault are not interested in helping me. A car that doesn’t last as long as my kettle!!
Responses to this review
I’m thinking I may have the same issue with my car, a 06 model 70k. Does it make a thumping noise while turning or bearing right? what happens when they do go? - Courtney from Wiltshire
Submitted: 2009-08-26 | ID: 3477 | 1/10
![]()
Having had Renault’s before I was aware of the cost of parts and labour, which are not cheap in comparrison to other brands. Therefore it was important to find a good example with service history. After getting a 70k model the first thing I had to do was get a service and cambelt change, be aware that most independant garages are recomending a water pump change and gave good reasons to do so... Renault did not! Renault agents were expensive as you would expect at £670 for service and belt. The paint work is what I have found not to good, it appears to be quite thin and the undercoat on my blue version does come through rather easily. The isofix seat in the rear is also suspect as constant use of it down does tend to mishapen it and therefor create problems getting it to sit correctly. Fuel economy seems to be very good at around 37 around town. It is early days for us, but this is what has jumped out at us so far.
Submitted: 2009-08-24 | ID: 3468 | 4/10
![]()
I haven’t actually got a Megane but I had a 1999 Clio 1.6 16V which I loved and was totally reliable. I now have a Toyota Yaris which I absolutely hate, nothing but problems from new and it is horrid to drive and in fact I am in the process of rejecting it. I regret getting rid of the Clio and YES Renault dealers can be rather patchy along with the build quallty of some models but at least the cars are usually nice to drive and problems can get resolved. Also if you read what people think about the Clio on here, it is hard to work out why the Megane is apparently so different. What I am trying to say is the grass is not always greener on the other side and this "Don’t buy French cars" is a misleading myth from the past which should be dropped.
Submitted: 2009-08-17 | ID: 3443 | 4/10
![]()
Hello, I’m quite shocked at all these water ingress reports. I bought my Megane in February of 09 from Renault Cannock and have also have had an ingress problem. Currently they have had it back 4 times for the same problem but don’t seem to be able to fix it and I’ve been told now that because I park on a kerb (two wheels on two wheels on the road as most people do) that parking like this can stress the body or twist it. Is that right or am I being taken for a monkey by Renault? I’ve had conversations with Renault UK and they have been great and even though my car is out of warranty have done work on roof for free (although it was in warranty for the first 3 times they had it for the same problem). I’m now waiting to see if it leaks on a flat drive. I do love my car but what else can i do?
Responses to this review
I bought a Renault CC 1.6 Dynamique in November 2008 - last day of the month, poor sales, salesmen needed quotas for Xmas bonus and I got a good price - 06 plate, 29,000 miles 6 grand flat otherwise I'd probably not have bought it. The leaky roof is a constant on almost all of them it would seem. I know 2 people with them an they both have the same issues. There seems to be a standard faults that cause the leaks, the main one being the seals at the joint where the roof meets the screen and a pressure switch that when the door windows go up and touch the rubber seal it senses the seal is there and stops the window then pushes it slowly an extra couple of mm into the seal. My wife has a Tigra and the system is similar but more aggressive and works better than the Renault. I have had experience of both problems. The switch one is serious because when it is faulty the window goes up touches the rubber and stops meaning there is almost no seal and a lot of water can get in the seal; one gives a steady but slow drip when the car is parked up (either on the kerb or on the flat drive). This is common in most cars from what I've learned. I've learned to live with it. Other annoying things with this car are - clutch is very light - common again and the main one for me is that it's very flat - you have to be heavy on the gas to get it to go. It just loves cruising. I went for a drive in the country up to Alston today and every time I looked in the mirror there was a big snake of cars behind me. Other than that it seems a canny motor and if we ever get a summer in the next couple of years the roof will earn it's corn! - Davy Robson from Durham
You say that leaks are a common to almost all of them but you don’t have any real evidence apart from anecdotal stories of two friends. I too know a couple of people who have them. They are both on their second car without any problems. I’ve had my one and only for 18 months now without any problems with water leaks. It’s brilliant! Bill from England
Submitted: 2009-08-14 | ID: 3428 | 2/10
![]()
I had a problem with squeaking coming from the rear parcel shelf area after a shunt. I found a plastic cover had become slightly displaced & now it’s all quiet inside again. NEVER had a water leak either. If you half raise the roof & look on the inside at the base of the rear screen you will see scoop shaped covers either side. These have three plastic clips built into them that secure them to slots in the metalwork. On mine two of the clips had become dislodge so I pushed them back into place & lubricated with a small squirt of WD40; no more noise. You can see the other side of the covers with the roof up as plastic covers with a row of plastic rivets just under the rear window sill. I’ve had the car now, since new, for 18 months & it’s brilliant. Did a trip to Kent last week (about 300 miles) with the top down, windows up, all the way & it was lovely. Returned over 46 mpg over the full length of the trip (including the stop start bits) which I think is excellent for a relatively heavy automatic.
Submitted: 2009-08-10 | ID: 3384 | 5/10
![]()
Hiya Clarissa, these cars don’t come with a spare tyre, I found this out when I bought mine, but they are supposed to have a can of foam stuff that fills the puncture untill you can get it fixed.
Submitted: 2009-08-07 | ID: 3377 | 3/10
![]()
No, they do not come with spare tyre, however you should have a tyre repair kit in the boot, under the boot liner.
Submitted: 2009-08-05 | ID: 3370 | 4/10
![]()
Hi! I have had the car for 15 months and so far had knocking when accelerating sensibly in first gear, local dealer states it could be engine mount, exhaust mount or a bearing. Had a leak on the drivers side which was a simple fix. The seal coming up from the wing mirror on windscreen support had worked loose slightly and was letting water in through to the inside. It was pushed back in place and no more leaks so far despite heavy rain the other day. The parcel shelf creaking as experienced by others is a problem due to it not being aligned properly, a problem on earlier cars. The retracting quarter panel has got caught twice in the roof mechanism causing it to snap. problems caused by the cables stretching / coming away from the mounting. Again a common problem which Renault UK have ageed to investigate under warranty. Overall not the best car I have owned but 11k for a 2yr old convertible; you are not going to get Mercedes build quality. In reply to Clarissa you haven’t been sold a dud car, a majority of manufacturers do not supply a spare tyre. Lexus have been doing this for years with their CC (sc430) along with the new shape mini to name a few.
Submitted: 2009-08-05 | ID: 3369 | 3/10
![]()
Bought the Megane with my good lady partner, goes like a dream, starts well, economical, lovely in half leather and fabric, and only leaks water once in a while! All that I expected and wished for. And let me tell you, the cars not half bad either! All in all, if you buy a convertible, you’ll always get some water ingress in any make and model. Have to say, like many others, Renault Dealerships are a little unhelpful at times, but found Ford’s much worst in the past. We both love our cabrio, and each other!
Submitted: 2009-08-05 | ID: 3368 | 4/10
![]()
I love my Clio to bits. I used to have the older 2001 model which I also loved then in a weak brainwashed moment I bought a Toyota Yaris 1.3 which was dreadful to drive and had a lot of faults. So far the Clio has not had to go into the garage except for 1 service at 18K miles. I would recommend the Clio as an all round package and it seems to be very reliable, certainly does everything better than the Yaris did, what a seriously dreadful car that was.
Submitted: 2009-08-05 | ID: 3365 | 5/10
![]()
I have had nothing but trouble with this pile of you know what. If there was a naught star rating that would be to high. Never, I repeat never by a French car, unless you are French or just don’t care about trouble free motoring. It was my wife’s fault, she liked the shape of the rear end "Shake your ass and all that". I have some good news though, the gold fish that live in the door well love it. I had 2 fish now I have 6. As you can guess I hate it. I can’t even go to a drive through because the drivers window does not work, and they do not leave you enough room to open your door. There are more problems than you can believe, and I do not wish to bore you. So I repeat; don’t by a Megane.
Responses to this review
No way. I’ve got goldfish in my door panel too. Renault are rubbish. Let me explain what’s happening here! If you get two basic ingredients like, let’s say water and electricity, they don’t mix very well. The French dont know this yet but basically the water runs off the groove on the top of the door and has a drain that actually runs through the door thus mixing with the wires POP but look on the bright side the fish have somewhere to play? - Brett from England
Submitted: 2009-08-03 | ID: 3329 | 1/10
![]()
UPDATE on my Trafic. At 198000 miles the 2nd turbo chuck it big time, sucked the engine dry of oil. on the day I replaced the van we were on our way home from Oxford when the Traffic chucked it we got it home, I stopped it and it never started again so i bought another Vivaro, accident damaged 05 model, humped high front, no engine or suspenson damage and only 34k and swapped everything over in one lump. I know it might sound to some a bit extreme but i bought the vivaro damaged for £800+VAT and the local garage took £750 to remove and fit engine and suspension in one and I have still all the rest of the van for parts. And the van I bought to replace the first van is a Nissan Primastar se 2.5 dci150 (ok the badges say nissan) but it is a Renault and it goes well so far but I will keep you informed. Ps. I tripped it on a journey from East Kilbride to Tilbury docks it returned 57.1 mpg, that was at 50/56mph.
Submitted: 2009-08-03 | ID: 3328 | 5/10
![]()
Absolutely hate my Scenic; it’s just a big money box. Drove a Mazda 323 for 13 years with no problems whatsoever except the usual servicing/tyre replacement etc... Previous to that, I had a Honda, also a great car. Then I changed last October to this piece of crap as I needed more room for kids etc... Love the interior space but in the few months I have owned it, I have had to replace all the coils, water pump, cam belt and possibly now the head gasket as it is in again for repair after breaking down 5 times... Once on the motorway. When it is driveable again, I will be putting it up for sale and going back to a more reliable make of car.
Responses to this review
I totally agree with your report; we too had a Scenic and I got so fed up with the unscheduled visits to the Renault dealer that we traded it in for a Toyota Verso. No regrets on that deal! Toyota has been 100% reliable. I too will never, ever buy another Renault (or a French car for that matter!) - Murray King from Wiltshire
Never buy a 1600 renault Secnic 2002/3 as head gaskets give nothing but trouble. always go diesel 1-9dti or dci. Great miles and trust worthy all the way to 300,000 mile with regular servicing - David Mc Dowell from County Antrim
Submitted: 2009-08-03 | ID: 3320 | 1/10
![]()
Hi, could someone help me? I have had my car for a year now and yes, the door leaks sometimes but my main concern is that I previously had a blow out in my car once and the RAC came to change it he told me the cars do not come with spare tyres. I didn’t think any of it but then the same thing happened today, I got a puncture and was told all cars come with a spare tyre - do these cars come with a spare tire and have Renault sold me a very poor car or was the RAC man right in telling me they don’t come with spare tires??
Responses to this review
I had this problem too, Renault do not put spare tyres in now, just a can of foam to put in the tyre to get you to a garage where you can purchase a spare tyre - Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
I got a spare wheel for about £45 on Ebay. There is plenty of room to store it under the boot ’floor’ as well as all the daft little aerosols. It is not precisely the same as the other wheels but at least the car is driveable (as I discovered when I totally trashed my tyre by hitting a concrete block partly buried in gravel in a car park!) - Nicky Painter from Surrey
Submitted: 2009-07-27 | ID: 3311 | 1/10
![]()
The worst car I have ever owned, and I once owned a Datsun Cherry. My car has about 60,000 miles on and already a rear window motor has gone (400 Euro’s), the other one is about to go (another 400 Euro’s), a rear wheel bearing has gone (200 Euro’s), the sunroof no longer works (probably the motor, 400 Euro’s) and the driver door check strap has gone (400 Euro’s). I am trying to ignore the noise from the front wheel or suspension when I go over a bump as I’m sure it will cost big. I also own a 9 year old Saab 9-3 which has never given any trouble. It was obviously built to last. Renault shouldn’t be allowed to make and sell cars and I will strongly advise anyone I know not to go near any Renault model.
Responses to this review
Did you find out what was causing the noise? Mine is also making a noise, especially when going over bumps. Have had it in at 3 garages, and nobody can find the problem - Sharon Garside from England
I have had 2 Laguna’s with that problem, it turned out to be the shocker top mounts. Don’t take it to Renault - John Hall from Northumberland
In reply to the question about the noise, I did find out what it was. Amazingly it was something minor, a loose bolt somewhere under the engine. It only cost a few quid to have someone locate the problem and tighten it. However, since I wrote the review the other rear window motor has gone, I’m not bothering to get it fixed. Also the automatic handbrake packed in, which cost 730 euros to replace. DO NOT BUY ONE OF THESE CARS. (My 10 year old Saab 9-3 is still going like a dream) - Brian Matthews from Ireland
Still have this car. Now front passenger window motor is kaput. Haven’t bothered replacing it. Replaced the 2nd rear window motor with a non-Renault part for a quarter of the price, works fine. Also the dashboard display is gone, the clock, fuel consumption, trip mileage etc. reset every time the key card is taken out and the speedo cannot now be set to read in kilometers. Please do not buy one of these or any Renault - Brian Matthews from Ireland
Submitted: 2009-07-22 | ID: 3285 | 1/10
![]()
Update from last review. I had a water leak coming from the drivers window and back hinges on roof. Got it fixed 3 weeks ago where they replaced 2 door seals and a back window. Now I have leaks from both windows and the window they replaced doesn’t go up properly. I’ve got water marks all over the seats. I’ve also now got a cracking noise coming from the glass roof. This car is turning into a nightmare which is a shame as it’s a great car to drive and looks stunning.
Responses to this review
In response to Lisa, we have had the creaking glass roof problem since we bought the car new in Sept 2007.The car has been to the dealers on 8 separate occasions, without curing the "cracking" noise. We have been told that it is NOT the glass roof panel, but more likely the catch not connecting properly. To date we have had 2 set of catches on drivers and passenger side, all new seals, and even a new roof, but still the problem persists, and the car is going in yet again next week. The car is fantastic other than this continual cracking noise, which can become like water torture after a very short time, anything over 5 miles!! - Nick Stevenson from Cheshire
Update: This car has now been into the garage being fixed 6 times now. The last time being this week where they have had it for a week. I put the car in complaining again of the water leak and a rattling window at the back. The car is also failing to start in the mornings if I keep it in the garage. I again have been advised that they can find no leak!!! Even though it leaks when I wash it. No fault with the rattling window and guess what.....its started first time so they didnt see a fault with the car starting. I only get 39 miles to £10 of petrol I know automatics can use up more petrol but that seems to me to be very gutsy - Lisa McKay from Aberdeenshire
Submitted: 2009-07-20 | ID: 3268 | 1/10
![]()
Excellent car. Great performance/equipment including duel climate, cruise, speed limiter, auto lights/wipers, day running lights.
Submitted: 2009-07-20 | ID: 3263 | 5/10
![]()
Don’t ever try to change a headlamp bulb on the Modus!! In fact, don’t try to change anything under the "bonnet" of a Modus. Thanks Mr Modus designer for costing me £40 for a new £3 bulb!
Submitted: 2009-07-16 | ID: 3249 | 3/10
![]()
Although I love my sexy black convertible, when the roof is up the creaking from the plastic parcel shelf area is horrendous - even with the radio on full blast the noise drives me mad. Has anyone else got this problem? Any suggestions on how to resolve this?
Submitted: 2009-07-16 | ID: 3241 | 2/10
![]()
I’m running a swb trafic and am finding strong smell of oil when travelling on motorway recently. Came off slip road this morning, where i found it impossible to get any gears. reading these reports, sounds like I’m in for a major shock with a replacement clutch!
Submitted: 2009-07-16 | ID: 3239 | 2/10
![]()
Super little car, flies up hill for a small engine,and returns good mpg but has anyone had to change a front sidelight bulb? No? Well I have! The bulb costs about £1 - to change it at the local Renault garage costs about £30!!! Why? Because the bumper has to be removed, fortunately my local garage found a short cut, long story, but didn’t cost anything! Then there’s the oil filter, what a stupid place to put it, you have to be pretty agile to change it, took another local garage 1 hour to change the oil and filter at a cost of £29 ,the poor guy that did the job said "We wont be doing any more of these at that price". Why do the makers try and make little jobs so complicated, I cannot believe that they want us to take our cars to main dealers every time the slightest little job has to be done!!!
Submitted: 2009-07-15 | ID: 3234 | 4/10
![]()
Nothing but problems with this car as soon as the 12 mnth dealers warranty ran out (Renault dealer). Had it just over 18 mnths, had a new EGR valve (diagnosed by renault), new mass airflow sensor, another new sensor (cant remeber what and still hasn’t solved the problem (engine under load, injection light and no power) My local garage sick of seeing me (every 2 weeks) then to top it off failure of slave cylinder in clutch which results in a complete gearbox disassembly just to get to and repair, boot catch refuses to release or lock depending on its mood. Needless to say wont touch French cars with a barge pole now, clutch repaired (and off to part ex it for summat more reliable). Steer well clear if you can. On the flip side, I had a good garage who didn’t rip me off unlike Renault who charged me £85 to diagnose the issue grrr.
Submitted: 2009-07-08 | ID: 3201 | 1/10
![]()
My view on the conny is that it is nothing but trouble; the roof is leaking on both the passengers side and the drivers. The fab filter went and this cost £1,000. Then, one fuel injector went - this car is just c**_p. I will never buy a Renault convertible again.
Submitted: 2009-06-29 | ID: 3160 | 1/10
![]()
We brought our Clio on line, it came with free metallic paint and a CD upgrade, we paid £160 to have a sunroof fitted, the car itself is totally reliable, last year we drove from Kent up to North Yorkshire, got out fresh as a daisy and kept up with the traffic no problems, only gripe is the sunroof it squeaks when its closed have had Renault look at it but still does it , but overall a great little motor , will no doubt run it till it drops.
Responses to this review
Try fixing a small piece of self adhesive foam to the catch, it works a treat on curing a squeaky sunroof - FA from Swansea
Submitted: 2009-06-26 | ID: 3152 | 4/10
![]()
I have to say I love my Renault cabriolet it has been a joy driving with the roof down and up! And it only takes 18-20 secs to collapse the roof and ample boot room - in my opinion I have test drove the Astra twin top and this beats it hands down. The boot is wobbly on the Astra and there is more room in the boot on the Renault up or down!! Economic too! I had the cream partial leather interior and what a difference it made the car felt light inside and airy especially with the glass roof which made driving an absolute pleasure. I’ve had it for 2 1/2 years and am sad to say that the car goes back to Renault in 3 months time the people that have found faults with their vehicle in my opinion must have had a bad car because I loved mine! I know this probably doesn’t help you as you may think you need to be lucky to get a good car from Renault but I think this happens with almost everything in life - not acceptable I know but hey though that’s life!!!!!! Good luck all!!!
Submitted: 2009-06-22 | ID: 3133 | 5/10
![]()
Hi Sarah (Hampshire); an easy way to lock the Megane with the roof down is as follows: stop your car and take the card out, put the steering lock on then put your card back in. Don’t start the engine press start 5 times get out and lock the car as normal you should hear a high pitched bleep.
Submitted: 2009-06-18 | ID: 3114 | 5/10
![]()
From the very first day of owning this vehicle we have experienced nothing but problems. 4 x Breakdowns / Injection coils x 4 have all failed individually and been replaced approx £150 each time via Renault. Stalling problems - camshaft sensors failed x 2 types and been replaced. Very noisy clacking on starting due to camshaft dephaser - needs replacing (approx £700). Auto Gearbox failure - New gearbox required (Renaults advise) at approx. £3,000 / we opted for a repair to part of the gearbox by a specialist at £1,000. We have finally given up on this car following many heated conversations with Renault, but do they really care!?!? At face value these cars appear to be good value, but on hindsight if we had spent more money initially on buying a more premium quality car e.g. Toyota / Honda, we would be much better off in the pocket and a great deal happier. DO NOT BUY THIS CAR !!!
Responses to this review
Hi Ross, I can sympathise with you! We had the same faults as yourself... but Renault did all the work for free!! It’s a common design fault apparently, so as an act of goodwill they did all the work for nothing. Arnold clark also deserve praise for pressing Renault to get the jobs done!!! Dave Westhead from Lancashire
Submitted: 2009-06-18 | ID: 3113 | 1/10
![]()
This is the worst car we have had, and I have had it a year. It was in garage for 7 months of that; head gasket went, it came back and wouldn’t start; gasket went again, still no good; had new fuel pump, crankshaft, speed sensor, injector fuel filter, set plugs x 3, alternator, battery, sunroof leaked. In the end we traded it in as we couldn’t trust it. I lost a lot of money we didn’t have in just 13 months.
Submitted: 2009-06-17 | ID: 3111 | 1/10
![]()
Jay from Sussex has sent in a reply to this review
Sarah - You'll see a button with a padlock printed on it (it's the same size as the Start button) to the left of the hazard warning light switch; when you have switched off the engine, press and hold this button in for about ten seconds until you hear a "clunk" - this sets the immobiliser without the alarm. Get out of the car and just shut the door and walk away (I think you have about 15 seconds to do this); the car will be locked, secure but silent!
Submitted: 2009-06-17 | ID: 3108 | 5/10
![]()
Hi everybody! I have my CC - my "Black Tomcat" almost 1 year as the second Megane in family (the first is the hatchback 2l 2007 - bought new) and I hadn’t any problem except hands free device. This car is enjoyable to drive, responsive, fun, economical and doesn’t have a leaking roof. The keyless card is fantastic. My friend has a Mercedes SLK -- I think it is some other category of car -- and... leaking roof! - without comment. I can recommend this car to buy as a excellent car for a good price. Good luck!
Submitted: 2009-06-11 | ID: 3087 | 5/10
![]()
Bought this car a week ago. Read the reports on the site and asked the seller if she had experience any problems with a leaking roof to which she replied no. Went out to the car this morning to find that the passenger seat was wet with rain....gutted. Have called the Renault dealer and they can not get the car into the garage for another 2 weeks!! I hope its fixable as the car itself is a dream to drive although there are a lot of clunking noises coming from the doors of the vehicle. The roof was also squeaking today and the leak. I hope I am not going to be unfortunate and have a car that leaks all the time as staying in Scotland there can be lots of rain!!!
Submitted: 2009-06-08 | ID: 3066 | 2/10
![]()
I have eight Renault vans, 6 Trafic’s and two Master’s - had Ford and Vauxhall vans too - but Renault by far the best. The Vauxhall’s spent more time in the garage than working. Ford had a fuel problem - took 10 weeks to fix. No major problems with Renault’s, our vehicles do 80,000 miles per year. Master vans side doors are rubbish though - don’t close properly after the 1st week.
Submitted: 2009-06-04 | ID: 3050 | 5/10
![]()
Hi everyone, I have now created a website to report in detail the problems with the water ingress in my Renault Megane Coupe Cabriolet. I will also be posting information which people considering to sue Renault or the dealer might find useful http://meganewaterleak.googlepages.com/
Submitted: 2009-06-03 | ID: 3047 | 1/10
![]()
I have just bought a 2005 Renault Trafic 1.9dci 100bhp with 50k miles. Drives very good, easy to run and nice to handle. I gave the van a full service and then noticed at road ends the van would stall. Put the van onto the computer and it said broken "fly wheel tooth", at the end up it was a broken wire. Fixed by Renault for £148. A week later the master cylinder to the clutch has packed in so it is hard to know what to think, but will keep you posted.
Responses to this review
Hi Chris, I see that your van had the cutting out at junctions. Mine has been doing this for ages randomly, sometimes it goes for ages without doing it, but recently seems to be getting worse. Have you any idea which wire it was that Renault repaired? This is driving me nuts but is also dangerous as it loses steering and brakes when it cuts out. Thanks - Snowy from England
Submitted: 2009-06-02 | ID: 3035 | 3/10
![]()
I’ve had this car for just over a year and the roof hasn’t stopped leaking. It’s a shame because apart from that it is a lovely car to look at and to drive. Anyway, I am in the process of initiating legal action against the dealer who sold me the car under the Sales of Goods Act, as the car is clearly not fit for purpose. I can see that there are a couple of people on this site who have initiated legal proceedings against Renault for the same reason and I would like to find out how you got on. Maybe we could share information and advice...
Submitted: 2009-05-27 | ID: 3006 | 1/10
![]()
Same problem, hard to start first thing then OK for the rest of day. They changed fuel-filter & air filter - problem solved.
Submitted: 2009-05-21 | ID: 2985 | 4/10
![]()
Can anybody who has had a clutch problem with a 2007 model of this car please let me know either on this site or on 07850 754459. As I have just had a 24000 service and the next day my car broke down. Renault are saying the clutch has burned out! My last Renault did 100k miles and never had the clutch replaced. Whilst I wouldn’t say I was a fantastic driver I have been driving for 25 years and had a variety of cars and never been heavy on the clutch. I had no warning of it going and it nearly caused a serious accident as I was changing gear in the fast lane!! Renault have agreed to pay 50% but I am still faced with a high bill and have no way of disputing the cause of the clutch burn out and information that can help my claim would be appreciated.
Responses to this review
Probably too late for you now, but I have just been told by Hylton Renault in Cheltenham that the clutch judder on our March 08 Megane saloon is a design fault in the clutch disc lining, and that a new lining is ’in development’. We were told that until it is available, there is no point in replacing it. I’m investigating further, but at least I now have an official record of this so, as & when our clutch blows early, I’ll be looking for a straight, free replacement, even after the warranty runs out - Michael Taite from Worcestershire
I would like to here from Michael Taite from Worcestershire concerning the comments made by Hylton Renault in Cheltenham. Call Ian on 07748516730 - Ian Hudson from Yorkshire
I have a Renault Megane 2007 Convertible which has developed clutch judder - the car has only done 18000 miles. The garage say that Renault are aware there is a problem and that there is no point in replacing it until they have finished "developing" the new replacement. However, this doesn’t help as the car is still juddering. Does anyone else have any further information that will help us to get Renault to replace the clutch under the warranty? Reading the above post, it would appear that this "developing" they keep talking about is not going to happen too soon! Thank you My email address is obidashi@fsmail.net - Rita from Lincolnshire
I bought a second hand Megane still under dealers warranty (Jan ’07, <25k on clock) and had a clutch judder, had to pay to have it replaced and that didn’t seem to do the trick as it’s returned!! Renault weren’t interested and said it was probably wear n’ tear. Numerous ongoing problems as well, including radio, air-con & electrics!!! Kerry from Staffordshire
I am having the same problem - Patrick from England
Bought Renault Megane Privilege CC 11 months ago. Under warranty until Sept 2010. Has 34,000 mile on clock, of which I have done 10,000. Clutch has gone. Dealership say ’wear & tear’ so isn’t covered by Warranty, going to cost in excess of £1,000; they are checking with Renault as I type if they are going to cover the cost, I doubt it but will keep you posted. It’s a big job, which involves stripping down the engine, so labour will be high too. Went on Renault Forum and it would appear people with similar problem have been told it is a design fault and that they are working on a new clutch. I shall go to dealership armed with this information in the hope it helps. Anyone with similar problems please feel free to contact me 07776438204 - Linda Richardson from England
Hi Lynne, I wonder what happened about your clutch burn out? I have the same year and model of car. My clutch completely burnt out after only 23K miles. The fly-wheel was also completely destroyed. The bill was over £1.5 K and Renault have refused to pay ANYTHING - even though the car is still in Warranty. I am fighting them but would be grateful of any advice you can give. Thanks - Nicky Painter from Surrey (nicky.painter@virgin.net)
Submitted: 2009-05-19 | ID: 2974 | 2/10
![]()
Right, first things first. I must thank each and every one on here for their comments as without sharing info we would be non the wiser. NOW FOR THE SLATING OF RENAULT... This is the story... We rushed into buying this car as it was a sunny day and it was parked in a fantastic spot with roof down. We needed a new car and it looked fabulous. We sat in it, did the roof manoeuvre and bought it (oh no I hear you all say) - what a big mistake. On the day of collecting the car I pointed out what looked to me like a bald tyre but Renault of Leicester said "its just road legal" with the finance on this used car it set me back 12k - I wasn’t impressed that I needed to replace a tyre before I could drive it, a few words on it was changed. Next day, on starting car it grumbled at me and cut out; another press another grumble and cut out. Third time lucky it was running but we went through this on every cold start, to a point it rumbled enough to turn heads. On returning to dealer I was told I needed to pay £147 + VAT to get a diagnosis run on it?? Yes, on a car that I had owned for 2-3 days. I wasn’t allowed to speak to the mechanics to ask their advice and the warranty would only cover mechanical breakdown. It hadn’t broke down as it still drives when running. An old guy who looked like a cleaner followed me out of dealership slipped me a piece of paper with a number on it and the words dephaser pully written in bold (scary or what). I called the number to be greeted by "Hello Renault Goscote Services". I explained what was going on he took the car details and told me the car was waiting to be repaired out of warranty as it was yellow flagged - they sorted the dephaser problem, and fitted new timing belt etc. They also repaired a sticking drivers window, re-tracked the roof joining seal as this would cause a drip on passengers lap. Every time I come across a problem with my car I make the call and get the answers immediately. Their customer service deserve more than an award, they’re friendly, there helpful, and they are prepared to sort any problem.
Responses to this review
I too have begun to suffer the ’grumbling’ sound when first starting up my Megane C. I took it to the local dealer who immediatly said it was the dephaser pulley. He also said to rectify it would need to remove the cam belt. My car’s only done 22,000 miles, Renault suggest replacing at around 70,000 miles. So the question is do they need to remove this belt in order to repair the dephaser pulley? Any help would be great on this one. They are quoting £650 including replacing the water pump - Alasdair Bruce from Kent
Submitted: 2009-05-18 | ID: 2971 | 3/10
![]()
Felt I have to write to somewhat offset all the negative comments being written as I have had my car for three months now and absolutely love it. I bought it as a 3 year old car, just out of warranty, for £6400 with 1 owner and 15k miles on it. We use it as a family car for 2 kids and 2 adults, it’s our only car so it gets lots of use including a 50 mile round trip to work everyday. I’ve done nearly 5000 miles in it already, with (touch wood) no problems so far, economy averages 47mpg which is excellent as I drive on the motorway err.... quite fast... ahem! Interior is very comfortable. Performance is excellent, very nippy with the 220lb ft of torque making most overtaking easy, I work for Jaguar R&D and rate this car highly against the current XF, the Meg CC has better seats and rides just as well. The roof gets pretty regular use and is great to use and very quick. Scuttle shake is evident on poor town roads when roof is down but otherwise its pretty good. NO LEAKS THOUGH AT ALL!! :0) The boot, when roof is up is HUGE, loads of space - had all sorts of stuff in ours including luggage for 4 people and two R&D workmates plus tools in there! Don’t ask why. I love some of the unusual features this car has such as the hidden door pockets and general amount of cubby holes - really clever, big cars should have these but never do for some reason. I’m a bit of a sucker for ’different’ cars having had Alfa’s, Citroen’s, Fiat’s and a Skoda Octavia VRS and this car fits that bill - my friends think I’m mad, but I love it. Didn’t know whether I would like it but I love it now which is a problem as I intended to sell it on in early summer so as not to make a loss but I will now be hanging on to it for at least a year I think. So in general if you want one go for it, I did and haven’t regretted it at all!
Submitted: 2009-05-18 | ID: 2970 | 5/10
![]()
Giving a star rating of 1 for this car is being very generous. We have had a ridiculous amount of problems with this it ending in it needing a new engine and so I am at last getting rid! We have a number of friends who also have a Grand Scenic and all but one have also had problems. When it is working it is great but this is sadly very rare! I will NEVER buy another Renault. Bought from Arnold Clarke in Warrington, never again!!!
Submitted: 2009-05-18 | ID: 2968 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my CC in 2007 and yes the roof did leak, however I took it back to Renault who referred me to the repairers in Lytham St Anne’s. They had it 4 times in as many weeks but, it hasn’t leaked in since. The repairers said that they also had the same problem with BMW & VW and several other drop top cars who’s roof was manufactured by Karman. It’s them who are to blame not Renault. Apart from that I love the car, I’ve been to the south of France in it and it was fantastic. My sister-in-law has the Focus CC and it’s not a patch for comfort, roof opening and acceleration; although mine is a 1.6 litre and hers a 2 litre. Mine is by far the more gutsy car. With the roof up the boot is huge and with it down I can still get in a few bags of shopping. I would definitely buy a newer version of this car.
Submitted: 2009-05-11 | ID: 2927 | 4/10
![]()
First the positives: Great looking car can’t agree with the comment re. grandparents driving positing. Firmish seats great torque for acceleration which you’d expect from the weight to power ratio and good brakes. Now the reasons why not to buy one (all appear to be common to the Dynamic: Minor: squealing brakes. intermittent fault with ECU keeps coming up with hand brake warning light. Major: 1) had 2 window regulators fail outside of 3 year warranty. Replaced 1 then on the 2nd failing at 4 years got in touch with Renault UK. Apparently this is a known issue and they have extended the warranty to 4 years on the window regulator but not published this so if you don’t know, you don’t know! Naughty! Needless to say, they didn’t offer any assistance with the 2nd window even though I’ve got the receipts for the first repair. 2) plastic on door handles is cracking. My local Renault franchise service manager says it’s a known problem. 3) Broken front coil spring at 40K miles. Apparently they can break much earlier. We were lucky??? My wife drives this car on A roads and motorway to work & back. The suspension get’s no work. 4) lights at front are virtually unserviceable at home. The owners manual recommend main dealer for changing light bulbs, at �100 a time. That’s in the region of �800 for changing light bulbs over say a 3 year period. That’s some ’cost of ownership’ model. Renault UK did provide some compensation towards this, but stated that it had been designed like this due to safety crumple zones at the front! TOSH! Driving without working lights at night is dangerous and an offence. If my wife has to find a Renault main dealer to change a light bulb on a weekend to be able to use the vehicle then in my book it’s not fit for purpose. I could go on but to say, if we hadn’t had the major issues I’d probably rate this car at 4.5 stars . It’s comfortable, sporty and economical. However, due to the major issues and lack of openness and helpfulness provided by Renault, I would have to say that I will never buy a Renault again and could never recommend this particular model as it’s major and expensive to fix faults/flaws.
Responses to this review
Scary, I thought "Who’s been in my head? This has been my nightmare bulbs". Take notice, a very bad car - Phillipa from England
Submitted: 2009-05-11 | ID: 2926 | 2/10
![]()
What a crock of s**t. I would advise anybody who is thinking of buying a van with this engine to seriously think again. It is nice to drive, comfy and a great size but the mechanics/electrics are c**p and it is not reliable in the slightest, in my experience. I have had a new gear box, clutch, alternator, EGR valve, air mass sensor plus numerous other bits and bobs. I would stay STAY CLEAR.
Responses to this review
I have a problem with the OPK type gearbox on my Espace 1.9 DCi. Specialists say it’s common, Renault do not. Is your gearbox a PK type do you know?? I’m trying to prove to Renault how common the fault is! Any comments can be sent to pkgearboxfault@hotmail.com please get all who have suffered to send details here as i require the evidence to help prevent others facing these huge repair bills please help! - Stuart Tite from Northamptonshire
Submitted: 2009-05-11 | ID: 2919 | 2/10
![]()
The leaky roof comes standard. I have had all the seals replaced but to no avail!! However the most niggling problem is the alarm. It only goes off at night and for no apparent reason. Does anyone have any idea what could be wrong?
Responses to this review
I had this problem when I first had my CC... The way I get around it is when I stop the engine, I then press the start / stop button 5 times. You will know if you have done it right as the dash will come back on and the stereo; close door and press lock and the lights will flash with no sound. You have isolated the interior sensors which cured it for me - Jason S from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Submitted: 2009-05-08 | ID: 2916 | 2/10
![]()
Renault cars play an important role in our household; reliability being the key factor in both our diesel and petrol vehicles. I can confidently recommend.
Responses to this review
If you had any sense you would have bought anything else than a Clio, especially the pre 05+ models - Graham from Cumberland
Re Graham from Cumberland - the TCE engines only became available in 2007, therefore it would have been one of the mark 3 clios which the writer was commenting about - Me Mo from Scotland
Submitted: 2009-05-08 | ID: 2915 | 5/10
![]()
Car has a lot going for it, lovely car to drive, roomy, comfy, plenty of power even in sixth gear and controls are well placed and easy to operate (my wife loves driving it). Even though it is a big car it is still easy to park. The down side is the high petrol consumption, only 20 mpg in town and 42 to 45 for motorway driving when you can stay in sixth gear. It really is a car for long distance driving, although it is great for the big supermarket shopping trip!! The big shock was when I came to replace a tyre; they are 205/55R17V. Choice is limited to about three manufacturers and they are all the top end of the market. The cheapest I could find was £120 each tyre and that is a Dunlop Fastresponse. Looking at reviews on other websites, until recently, Continental were the only suppliers of this size of tyre and of course, loaded the cost of their tyres. As usual Renault have little interest in after sale support - why? They make some super cars why spoil it by poor support? I shall buy a Japanese car next time, friends tell me they get superb support and no nasty surprises. PS When I read the reviews on the Renault Scenic not one mentioned the tyre problem, hence the reason for my review.
Submitted: 2009-05-06 | ID: 2905 | 3/10
![]()
DON’T buy this muck. It was the worst van I have bought. I had one which we got and had extra seats and a pull down ramp fitted and parts for a wheel chair to clip into this. It was bought brand new and on arriving at my home the electrics were faulty 3 months later. Renault tried again and again to fix; then the roof started to leak and the power steering went, then the gear box went - all before the car was a year old! What a pile of tin.
Submitted: 2009-05-06 | ID: 2896 | 1/10
![]()
Can I firstly say there are a lot of reviews on here that I read in great detail and nearly changed my mind about buying the Megane CC. Anyone who is reading these reviews, because they are thinking of buying a Megane, just remember there have been a lot more cars bought than the ones mentioned here. Most people only seem to post reviews because they want to complain about the faults. I have poured water from a bucket over the roof while washing the car and guess what - no leaks, drives like a dream, top converts with ease, driven at speed - no shattering glass, no rattles, or squeaks, it is a pleasure to drive and loving every minute of it. If your considering buying then go for it - don’t be put off and if you do end up with a car that leaks or has any of the faults mentioned in these reviews then I guess you are an extremely unlucky person and will be joining the minority - what ever your dream is go for it.
Submitted: 2009-05-05 | ID: 2889 | 5/10
![]()
I don’t know if I’m lucky but I can say hand on heart that my Renault Megane CC 2.0 Privilege Turbo, Reg 2007 is the best car I have ever purchased. No leaks, no engine problems, no nothing apart from a from an headlight bulb blowing a couple of weeks ago. This is my second CC. It appears reading previous comments that customer services at certain garages throughout the UK need to get there act together or potential buyers of Renault will start looking elsewhere.
Submitted: 2009-05-01 | ID: 2879 | 5/10
![]()
I have had my Renault Scenic for three months and in that time it has never started first time, it’s terrible. I have taken it to two garages and they say it has no problems. It’s now with the company I bought it from they said its OK too, we told them to keep it till it goes wrong so they can fix it. Gone off it a bit because of this can’t afford to change it, not sure what to do, the whole thing is very stressful and I feel like ramming it up a wall.
Responses to this review
Try using your spare key instead...might work? - Denny Jones from Northern Ireland
I have a 2005 dcI Scenic and Im having the same problem with it not starting first time I’ve only had the car 5 days and its done it from day 1! Does anybody know a possible cause for this? Also, my preheating/ignition warning light has never come on - Amanda Gorton from Cheshire
I have a 54 plate 1.5 dci that won’t start first time, and the ignition coil light comes on very rarely. Anyone know what I should expect on the bill if I took it in? - Kerry from Norfolk
Submitted: 2009-04-21 | ID: 2837 | 2/10
![]()
Well... Don’t believe all that Renault and their dealers say as they fib (to put it mildly). I bought my Scenic last October to save some money on fuel... It’s averaged around 55 mpg which I’m delighted with... my BIG problem came when I pulled out of my supermarket car park and lots of alarm bells and flashing lights told me I had a parking brake problem (now is this a case of Renault overcoming a problem that never existed or what!!!... an automatic hand brake)... I took it to my main dealer who told me the motor unit was sealed (first fib) and it needed replacing at a cost of £370 for the unit (plus VAT) plus fitting (another £200 quid)... I asked my dealer in Plymouth if I could get a refurbished one or one from a breaker... The answer was no as it needed to be programmed to my car and it was a one-off system that couldn’t be reprogrammed (second fib). I wasn’t happy with that so I called Renault... they said the same (third fib)... I tried the dealer in Saltash... same answer (fourth fib). I then by chance ended up at a Renault specialist in Exmouth (Carlton Garage... excellent guys). I asked them if I could use a part from a breaker... they said no problem; they’ve done a few... I got one for £40 and they reprogrammed and fitted it for £80... Problem solved... apart from that the cars excellent, very reliable, comfortable and cheap to run.
Responses to this review
My hand brake got stuck in the on position so I pulled the release rope. Renault then told me it was the motor and it had packed in. The new hand brake system required was £750 from Renault so I got a local garage to fit a new one for £300 less - Gutted Very from Leicestershire
I do have the same problem with my Scenic and Renault doesn’t want to know. They said it was the motor on the hand brake that was faulty and nothin to do with them - David Irvine from Northern Ireland
I have had the same problem with Renault. When I went to the dealers about the parking brake fault they said it would cost roughly £650 and £75 per hour to fix it that only a Renault dealer could fix it. I wasn’t happy with this so went to try to find someone else to help me, in the mean time Renault contacted me by letter to ask me to bring in my scenic as there was a fault with the parking brake only for them to tell me when I went over that I would have to pay to have it fixed (same old same). Then I went to an auto spark who said it was a fault with the circuit board and it was up to Renault to fix it as this shouldn’t happen. Could you tell me the name of the part you got? Thanks - Dee Irvine from County Antrim
Submitted: 2009-04-21 | ID: 2836 | 4/10
![]()
Yes, the alarm does work with the top down, try it yourself. Lock the doors & leave the key in the house. Now try getting something out of the door pocket or centre pocket. Would you really like to leave your car with the top down somewhere you might need it to work though? I think that any vandalism probably won’t be covered. I always put the top back up when I leave it unless it is on the drive. p.s. my roof has never leaked :o)
Submitted: 2009-04-20 | ID: 2831 | 5/10
![]()
I bought this van brand new, my problem was the paintwork (unfortunately I bought a red one) and after 18 months white cloudy circles started to show - first on the bonnet then on most of the panels. I took it to my Renault dealer and the first thing he said to me was "Renault won’t be interested in this" (van still under warranty). I even had a phone call from France, all they did was to cut the paintwork back. It lasted a couple of years. Had to sell it before I wanted to due to deterioration. I don’t rate Renault after-sales or my local dealer (Fish Bros.) and would not buy another Renault ever.
Submitted: 2009-04-14 | ID: 2804 | 2/10
![]()
I bought the car in January and it has been great especially the MPG. I have had a few minor problem; I have a water leak which Renault tested and said could not trace, but surprise, it rained the evening after I picked up the car and I got a wet arm when sitting in the car and driving off. I also like to listen to 5-live, but the background noise is very poor and unacceptable. Renault tested the radio and said it is a common fault and they supposedly tried another radio in the car and it was still the same. Does anyone else have this problem? Also, if a radio is in fact taken out doesn’t it loose the programmed stations? I cannot see anywhere in the manual where you can alarm the car and keep the roof down. Is this possible or is the alarm just a volumetric alarm?
Submitted: 2009-04-08 | ID: 2767 | 4/10
![]()
Three clutches in less than a year and lesss than 3000 miles and Renault still can’t solve the juddering problem. They say it is down to poor driving technique!!! what a load of bull.
Responses to this review
We have a Renault Dynamique Sport Tourer, 2007 reg, purchased from a Renault dealer via "Renault to go" in 2008. We have had a clutch judder since purchasing the vehicle from Renault’s dealer in Norwich. The car is still under warranty (until April 2010), but Renault UK have refused to replace the clutch to date and will do nothing to help us. The judder has become so bad now when the clutch is warm, that it is now unsafe to pull out at junctions or roundabouts and I am having a baby in the car, this is really frightening me. I’ve had two near misses and am just waiting for that serious accident to happen, either to me, or to someone else. We are currently threatening Renault UK with legal action (we don’t know what else to do!), unless they try a replacement clutch in the vehicle, or indeed fix the problem they have created. Renault UK have confirmed that clutch judder is a manufacturing defect, due to the materials they use within their clutches. When the clutch becomes hot, the materials used cannot grip due to lack of moisture, which causes the clutch to slip, resulting in the judder. Apparently Renault used to use asbestos in their older clutches, which worked very well, but are no longer allowed to do so, under modern legislation. Renault are apparently working on a solution but will not confirm when this will be sorted and will not replace the clutch in view of this! In the meantime, everyone with a dangerous vehicle is left still driving on the road with no other option. I’m just waiting for the accident to happen. Then, if me and my baby boy are still here, I shall be suing them big time! Juliette from England
New clutch on my beautiful car at 18,000 miles "Driver error" they said. I wish I had looked at this site last year - Niki Swanborough from London
Hi Jack, my husband bought me a 2004 Renault Megane Cabriolet four months ago. I have started to get the same problem as you!!!! The juddering is driving me mental. Did you get yours sorted???? Anna Rostron from England
Submitted: 2009-04-07 | ID: 2764 | 1/10
![]()
I will never even drive one again or think of buying one again, this was the worst car ever with ongoing faults that Renault cant even sort. I bought the car with low miles and it needed a cat which Renault say should last at least 5 years but won’t except any of it, it needed a clutch, the dash stopped working, Renault couldn’t fix that. You can’t change the headlight bulbs, Renault have to do it coz you need to remove front panel seats which become very loose. The key packs up the stereo controls. The paint comes off, the dash boot is always loose, ignition coils go every winter and Renault still says there is no problem. They have had the most recalls of any, these cars are terrible- all this happened within 6 months and Renault will not help you or accept any liability. Mine was 2 years old and they classed it as usual wear. Also they loose alot of money-you can actually get an new shape 53 reg for less than an old shape 02 so that says it all. Forgot to mention the stupid handbrake that only works when it wants to and does not understand hills. Please don’t bother buying one, I’ve now got a CRV, same sort of money and twice the car. I would stay away from all Renault vehicles until they decide that all there fancy electrics just don’t work.
Submitted: 2009-04-07 | ID: 2762 | 1/10
![]()
Hi I just bought my blue Renault Scenic 1.6 RT last week. I was just about to tax my car today from my post office. The post office said that the car is still under a disabled class and has to be changed over to private class. Its a 1997 model. Very nice car to drive well untill I get it changed over to private class as the post office said that when they change it over I can taxed it from the DVLA office in glasgow.
Submitted: 2009-04-07 | ID: 2750 | 5/10
![]()
I bought the van in 2002. The current mileage is 100250 miles. I run a small business and (would like to) do 20k miles per year. This van is about to have its third replacement gearbox!! at £1400 each. It has had numerous electronics problems 2x BDC sensors, 1x various immobiliser components ie ’black boxes’. 1x Hydraulic steering pump. 1x Windscreen (stress fractures). And finally just out from having its fuel pump and cam sensor replaced the van is making a high pitch whining sound from the gearbox!!! I will NEVER buy a Renault van again. I also have an 03 Trafic which has had very similar faults. Both have a very poor reliability history.
Submitted: 2009-03-31 | ID: 2732 | 1/10
![]()
I have been madly and deeply in love with this car but, from the above comments, I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone of you for them. I thought my boyfriend just didn’t want me to purchase the car but I can now see what he meant. I’m off to Volkswagen.
Submitted: 2009-03-31 | ID: 2730 | 1/10
![]()
I bought my car second hand and can honestly say I didn’t have any problems until THE SUNROOF IMPLODED on me!! This happened as I was travelling down the motorway at 70mph and could have been disastrous!!! Suddenly finding myself covered with glass was not something I expected... nor was there any warning!!!! Having checked on the internet, I have since found that this is NOT an isolated incident and is a recurring problem with Renault cars!!!!! I will NOT be buying another Renault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Submitted: 2009-03-31 | ID: 2725 | 3/10
![]()
Well, I had no idea how common a leaking roof was until I stumbled upon this website! I have had my CC for over a year and it has only just started leaking and now both my front seats are completely stained. I booked the car in to have the work done under guarantee and was told I had to wait 4 weeks for a courtesy car to be available for 4 days whilst they carried out the work. During the 4 weeks its snowed, OMG, I had to drive my car home with the drivers seat literally dripping wet, it took 5 days for it to dry out again. After this happened I contacted Renault to see if they could fit me in sooner as I was getting a little wet and they told me I should keep the car in a garage at all times! How is this possible when I bought a car to drive not to keep in a garage! 4 weeks passed (few wet bottoms) and I take the car into the garage - IT WASN’T EVEN BOOKED IN!! I was not happy at all, a courtesy car was booked out for me but was not there so they have given me a Fiat 500. I’m not the smallest of people and find it really awkward to drive. I was told they had no other cars available at all even though I had to wait 4 weeks for one to be available that wasn’t there anyway!!! My mum has had a soft top for 8 years and has not once had a leak! I think its outrageous they are aware of the problems with the cc but still treat us like this!
Submitted: 2009-03-30 | ID: 2708 | 3/10
![]()
Just to follow up on my leaking roof, it rained all day today, very heavy (no leaks). Also, I have looked very closely at the seals and they seem to have been replaced, the seal has a much larger draining hole running through the middle, to let more water through, my be a new design.
Submitted: 2009-03-25 | ID: 2696 | 4/10
![]()
The Grand Scenic is a lovely sized car , with 3 good separate seats in the rear (all separately removable). The rear most 2 fold flat seats are for children only. Good front seats & plenty of under seat & floor storage bins. Door pockets (front) have blocked access when doors are shut... very poor. Overall, for car size, the Grand Scenic is really spacious, cannot find any better elsewhere for the price. I have the 1.9 litre 120DCi Engine, non particulate filter version. Over 50 mpg & a low CO2 thus about £140 tax. BUT HEY, there are faults & plenty of them... I have had 2 engine mounts snap & replaced & I drive relaxed, cruiser style. I have had the glow plugs fail & replaced, oil leaks, electronic faults with front & rear washers, headlamp bulbs fail (needing the car to go into garage as, cannot access headlamp without removal of front panels, big job and costing over 100 pounds !!!!!). Rear light letting in water, manufacture fault etc... Now just to help you out there. Look at getting your extended warranty with www.warrantydirect.co.uk as they are far the best, covering wear & tear , MOT failure parts, labour etc... look on-line for peace of mind & a good price. Using the Renault or AA or others are not so good. Please note the newer Scenic use the DCi130 engine and although better, they use the particulate filter which has to be replaced every 9,000 miles - this is a pain as you still have to come in for those services to engine later . Worth looking into. WELL THAT’S ALL FOLKS!!
Submitted: 2009-03-23 | ID: 2678 | 3/10
![]()
Roof leaking in all 4 corners, taken to Holden of Norwich, the Renault main dealer, very friendly staff, seem to know all about leaking roof and how to fix them. It seem the seals on the roof needs to be sealed themselves, this means removing the roof, remove seals and put back on using a type of seal (mastic type stuff). Don’t quite know what that means, it did leak when using a hose pipe, and when it rained, seems to be fine now with a hose, just waiting for it to rain. enjoy your car and don’t let it take over your life, I have had a mgf and an mgtf both leaked but what the hell, life’s too short, buy yourself a set of water proof seat covers. Would I buy another one? Yes.
Submitted: 2009-03-19 | ID: 2675 | 4/10
![]()
After buying a Renault Coupe Cabriolet I read all these reports and went outside with some water... and yes mine leaks too. I’m with you all but the car is damn sexy lol. Oh, and I had call some one out, the fuel cap had jammed. All on my first day... wonderful.
Submitted: 2009-03-19 | ID: 2667 | 3/10
![]()
Great car for the money if you buy second hand. Picked up a 56 plate 2.0 Privilege in grey with full leather and fully kitted out with only 5000 miles on the clock for under nine grand. I’ve looked at the competition, and to all the whingers out there, the competition has its fair share of problems too. Was going to buy an EOS, but found that it had a leaking roof on the test drive and it didn’t feel any different behind the wheel. Not had any real problems at all and glad I got it. Oh yes, to those people posting about howling brakes on their CC’s. Its not just these cars that suffer. The regular Megane suffers too. I had a 53 plate Megane hatch that did it. Just learned to ignore it. Like I suggest people do with some of the reports here. Just ignore them and go out and buy.
Submitted: 2009-03-19 | ID: 2662 | 5/10
![]()
I have just had some work done on my car - needed new coil and spark plugs. Yesterday, the message Roof Mechanism Fault came up on the display and I wondered if anyone could offer advice? The roof still goes up and down, I have checked manual but it is of no help. I have my car for nearly a year and up until now I have had no trouble at all with it. Also, the back drivers side window does not go down with the rest of them when the roof starts going down. Help!!
Responses to this review
I’ve noticed that it says this if you catch the button to put the roof down and the guard isn’t pulled across in the boot - Jason from England
Submitted: 2009-03-16 | ID: 2659 | 4/10
![]()
I’ve had the car since October last year and had no problems so far. Let’s hope it stays that way. It’s a real eye-catcher with roof up or down.
Submitted: 2009-03-13 | ID: 2625 | 4/10
![]()
Following reporting my glass roof imploding while stationery on my driveway to Renault Customer Services they have refused my warranty claim. The only comment they would make is that they have never heard of this type of fault previously. I find this hard to believe given the amount of coverage on various websites relating to similar issues. They have not given me anything in writing or suggested any valid technical reason for this incident. The quotation for the repair is in excess of £3k and the dealer Arnold Clark Renault in Stirling have not sent me a copy of the detailed quotation despite several requests. As someone who has been a loyal Renault customer over the years I am appalled.
Submitted: 2009-03-03 | ID: 2592 | 1/10
![]()
Bought the Kangoo new in August 2007. I drive a 60 mile commute every day and have 26000 miles on the clock. 2 services and nothing but filter and oil changes so far. The engine has so much torque that passing on a country lane is confident and trouble free. Tight corners at speed make you a bit seasick as it wallows a lot so slow down as its not a sports car. Side-winds hardly bother the car, a fact which seems strange considering its height. I’ve driven it on Hungarian motorways at 90mph for hours without feeling insecure in a heavy side-wind (a Honda Accord I owned was much more sensitive, a 69 Volkswagen van used to put me in the other lane.) Since I’ve owned it I have averaged @50mpg and my small son loves the space in the back. Modern vehicles tend to be very claustrophobic but this is such a bright happy car with lots of room for a small family on long trips. The headlights are the best I have ever driven with in a car. Very good spread and length on low beam, extreme distance on high. The brakes are a bit spongy and loud first thing in the morning, but so far this is the only fault I have found in the car.
Submitted: 2009-03-02 | ID: 2588 | 4/10
![]()
Just read a few more reviews on here. No one seems to explain how much water is coming in through the roofs or where it is coming in. Main dealers, whatever the manufacturer, are notorious at seeing us all as a licence to print money. Especially those out of warranty. My wife has an Audi TT Roadster 3.2 and its roof started leaking, they told me it would cost £600-900. I researched on the net, it took me 15 minutes to fix a blocked drain hole and nothing else. Information is power but only when you pool knowledge. Surely some one must know what is the cause of this re-occurring problem! If you do then you need to post it on here it will help all these other drivers. My roof has never leaked. I sometimes after very heavy rain get a couple of drops on my lap after opening and then closing the door but then ALL roadsters /cabriolets do this, I have had many over the years.
Submitted: 2009-03-02 | ID: 2583 | 5/10
![]()
I have been in and out of Liverpool Renault in Sefton Street. Last time I took my car I had a leaking roof and water coming in through the mirrors. I left the car for 6 hours so they did a good check on it... and guess what they hadn’t looked at it. The car was in the same bay 49 and the lies they told me . MAY I SAY I WOULD BE HAPPY FOR THEM TO GO BUST. I WOULDN’T SET FOOT IN RENAULT GARAGE AGAIN IF YOU GAVE ME A FREE CAR! Ps That’s what I think of the French c**p.
Submitted: 2009-02-26 | ID: 2571 | 1/10
![]()
Hi all Megane Coupe Cabrio owners and thanks for all your warnings! I was about to part exchange my beloved 1.0 12v 2004 Corsa for a 2005 1.6 Megane. Thank the gods I found this site! I haven’t the time, money or energy for all these hassles, leaking roofs, imploding sunroofs, 2lb bits of plastic and metal flying off and injuring people...nah!! I’m looking at a 2005 Peugeot Coupe Cabrio. I’ve tried the 2005 Peugeot Coupe Cabrio; it was just too small and expensive for what I need. Thanks for all the warnings, Top gear, Fifth Gear et all never warn about these kind of problems. Good luck all!
Responses to this review
So you didn’t actually buy one and try it then? - Harry Wright from England
Submitted: 2009-02-25 | ID: 2559 | 3/10
![]()
Last submitted to this site on 18/04/08. Since the garage smashed my roof whilst the car was in their care for water ingress, they tried to get me to pay £2,500 for a new roof and 8 hours labour to fit. Phoned Renault UK and eventually the garage footed the bill. Whilst fitting the new roof they damaged nearly every panel on my car. Went to pick car up and was shocked at the condition of it. If that was not bad enough my car had water on the seats. When I questioned the garage on this they then saw fit to inform me that the valeter had run my car through an industrial car wash! I refused to accept my car. Back on phone again to Renault UK. After 3 months I eventually got my car back and guess what? it was still leaking and the paint job to fix the damage to the panels was terrible over spray bubbles, paint brush marks and matt paint on a metallic car! I got in touch with Renault UK again and they sent up a "technical expert" who has fixed my roof (this remains to be seen as it has not rained since I got the car back). The technical expert has told them I got a good paint job. 1 - THE EXPERT MUST HAVE A PROBLEM WITH HIS VISION! Renault UK have now washed their hands of me. That’s nice considering I have been a renault customer for near on 20 years. I have an expert coming to my home at the cost of around £175 to give me a report on my car. I will then be taking legal action against the Renault garage in Sighthill Edinburgh and Renault UK. What I find most annoying is that I did not damage the car in the first instance, it was the garage but yet they expect me to drive around in a 2 tone car with the worst patch up job I have seen. Will keep you posted as to how I get on.
Submitted: 2009-02-24 | ID: 2556 | 1/10
![]()
I purchased the car in June 2008 and was enjoying it until recently, especially driving with the top down. The roof wasn’t leaking at all. However, now the car has developed a judder when you start up at junctions and did not handle well in the recent cold spell when compared to my previous car (Renault Laguna). The rear parking sensors have stopped working. The worst though is that last week the glass roof imploded falling on my head when I shut the door of the car. The roof had not been hit by anything and there was no other damage to the car bodywork, front or back windscreens to suggest it had. It is currently with the dealer and I am waiting on a response from Renault Customer Services. This is my fourth Renault car and it is the first time I have had reason to complain.
Submitted: 2009-02-23 | ID: 2549 | 2/10
![]()
I’m from Guernsey, but now live in France. In Dec 06 bought brand new Trafic with 2 year warranty in France. Just 3 days after end of warranty hydraulic pump & cylinders failed. Renault France repaired all for free. On 28/12/08 whilst in Guernsey master & slave cylinders failed for clutch hydraulics. £1350 to repair. Renault UK tell me it’s an occurring fault with the Master range, seems also to be with the Trafic’s, having browsed the web. Renault have offered to pay 50% of cost. This morning had meeting with advocate to pursue through courts as Renault France failed to answer just one question; is it possible that they have inadvertently used parts from their supplier that may have been substandard? I have had many more problems too numerous to mention on this site plus 2 recalls one only just before Christmas; the last regarding a possible brake defect.
Responses to this review
Hello Steve, I'm French and have got mechanical breakdown with my Trafic 2.5 dci 06/2006. I live in Tours, France - could you please contact me by phone (Home: 0247665799, Cell: 0683460401)? You have said that you contacted a lawyer, I would be interested in talking to you about this - Emmanuel Francois from France
Submitted: 2009-02-23 | ID: 2546 | 1/10
![]()
Very comfortable, good on fuel; an excellent car. Always said I would have another Renault Scenic after owning one for three years; great to drive and spacious.
Submitted: 2009-02-18 | ID: 2539 | 5/10
![]()
Emma - any update on how you got on with the Renault dealer regarding the judder? I think mine is getting worse!
Submitted: 2009-02-13 | ID: 2514 | 2/10
![]()
My husband and I bought a Clio Campus 58 plate for our daughter. It’s a great little car apart from the accelerator which is horribly stiff and sticky to drive and you cannot drive smoothly in first gear in queuing traffic no matter how hard you try. I have had the accelerator cable replaced but it has made no difference. I have now taken it in to the garage to see what else they can do!
Responses to this review
Same problem as Rosie, Pat and Charlotte. Has anyone had a satisfactory response from Renault? Ken from Ayrshire
Submitted: 2009-02-11 | ID: 2507 | 4/10
![]()
I bought this car from Renault - enough is enough - roof leaks, mirrors leak, car judders when roof is down and guess what? Renault said that all Renault cars judder! I WOULDN’T BUY A RENAULT CAR AGAIN!
Submitted: 2009-02-06 | ID: 2480 | 2/10
![]()
I have exactly the same problem as Kerry from Cheshire I also have the leak. I’ve been driving for over 20 years and started to think I needed a refresher until I read Kerry had the same problem - I’m on the phone to my dealership now. Will let you know how I get on.
Submitted: 2009-02-05 | ID: 2473 | 2/10
![]()
I’d be very intrested to hear how Kim Dickenson, Cheshire gets on with the legal side. I also have a leaking roof and the seat is stained from all the water. Renault are saying that it’s a design fault and I might just have to put up with it unless Renault head office come up with a fix. I’ve also been told not to park it on a hill and to make sure that it is parked flat which is impossible to do all the time.
Submitted: 2009-02-02 | ID: 2458 | 1/10
![]()
I have now owned this car for 3 years and it is fair to say it has been a nightmare. For the past 18 months I have had the service light on constantly and "Check Injection" on the screen. Every morning I have the hassle of getting it started, which takes me around 5 or 6 attempts. Once started I then have to battle my way through a massive cloud of black smoke which comes out of the back. Once the car is warm the car starts no problem but when it is cold and been left standing for a couple of hours it is a pain. I have taken it to my local garage and to Renault main dealer; both of which cannot seem to come up with a proper solution (Renault told me it would be my computer which would cost £1500 but I just don’t believe them). After being told by friends and relatives it could be the glow plugs I took it to my local garage and had them changed. The service light and injection reading disappeared and the car started on the button first time in the morning. Then a day later the service light reappeared and the check injection back. I am now fed up of the embarrassment of starting it in the car park at work at the end of the day with everyone staring at the black smoke so I am writing to warn people - DON’T BUY A RENAULT!!!!!
Submitted: 2009-01-28 | ID: 2437 | 2/10
![]()
I bought this car in July 2008 and have had nothing but problems with the vehicle. It does nothing but leak, has been in the garage more than 8 times and still comes back with the same fault. Holdcroft Renault advised that this is not a common fault but from the comments it is. They say not to park on hills etc... it’s a car for got sake, not only that why do they not tell you all this information before you buy. This is still an ongoing problem. Holdcroft Renault then offered me a like for like swap, which I accepted and guess what this one also leaks but worse, they are saying they will not swap for another vehicle and they have to repair it. I took the car for repair in December 2008 which they said I would have to have a courtesy car for 1 week - which cost me a further £25 on insurance to swap it over. I still have the courtesy car today as they have told me that they have repaired the vehicle then did another water test and again it still leaks. The customer service is also disgusting, I’d rather drive an old mini than a coupe cab. IF ANYONE GOES TO RENAULT AFTER THESE REPORTS YOU MUST LOVE HASSLE !!!!!!!!
Submitted: 2009-01-22 | ID: 2413 | 1/10
![]()
Ordered this car new from Sunwins with every extra. The car is enjoyable to drive, responsive, fun, economical and doesn’t have a leaking roof. Love the keyless card. About to get my third set of front tyres at 35,000 miles! I find this car really practical with a huge 600 litre boot. The paintwork is gold metallic and looks fabulous with the hood down. Residual values are very poor but if your happy who cares.
Submitted: 2009-01-16 | ID: 2391 | 5/10
![]()
Me too. You’re not on your own, we have the dreaded shudder too! The only way to pull away smoothly is to add lots of revs.
Responses to this review
I purchased my brand new vehicle in March 07. Not long that after it starting juddering when in 1st and 2nd gear, particularly in heavy, slow moving traffic. This got gradually worse. Renault told me I had burnt the clutch out due to heavy useage (at 14,500 miles). I had this replaced and had a couple of months trouble free driving, then the juddering started again exactly as before. As it was only 5 months since I had my new clutch fitted I return to Renault fully expecting it to be repaired under warranty. No chance! I was told it was again down to heavy useage. I won’t even go into the problems I had trying to get them to at least contribute towards the costs which incidentally came to, in excess of £750. To date the car is 2 1/2 years old and has just touched 17,000 miles! I will never buy another Renault! - Cath from Lancashire
Submitted: 2009-01-16 | ID: 2387 | 4/10
![]()
Lovely car and great drive although it has had its share of problems. It started off with the boot gas struts failing which meant the boot would not stay open. Not ideal as my wife uses the car and as a mobile hairdresser, she is in and out of the boot all day. 2nd problem was the keyless entry failed. This was sorted very quickly although we did have to pay insurance surcharge for courtesy car. 3rd problem which has happened 3 times is a ’check injection’ fault. This is to do with a failed glow plug. When the car warms up, the fault clears if you turn the engine off and restart. Renault have fixed it twice but only replaced the faulty glow plug each time instead of the set of 4 which most good garages would insist on. This was probably because it was under warranty. The fault has come back again this winter, and I’m sure if I took it to Renault now, they would happily advise me to change the complete set as I would be paying for it this time. 4th problem was a headlight bulb failure. Renault have cleverly designed the car so you need to remove front bumper to change the bulb so they can charge you 2 hours labour. I manage to do it (with difficulty) by putting the car on full lock and accessing bulb through removable panel in wheel arch. The car now has 63K miles and I have enjoyed everyone of them but due to the amount of problems I probably wouldn’t buy Renault again.
Responses to this review
Gary when your cardkey went what did you do? Only my remote will not lock. Have checked batteries etc, taken it to a garage that said it was not the remote but something wrong, maybe computer. Renault want to charge £95.00 just to tell me what it is, any help would be gratefully recieved - Kay Vines from Middlesex
Submitted: 2009-01-13 | ID: 2379 | 2/10
![]()
I have a Megane CC (1.6) and I have developed an intermittent fault in 1st gear. Basically when the engine is warm (has been in traffic) I start to experience a shudder when I pull away from stationary in 1st gear. To be honest it is as if I cannot find the biting point for the gear, but I have had the car for nearly 3 years now and I know where the biting point is and it only happens when the engine is warm! Does anyone have any ideas what this could be (or experienced a similar problem)? My warranty expires in April and I want it to be sorted by then (but Renault say they cannot identify the fault when it has been into the garage - but they admit this could be because the engine is cold). Thanks.
Submitted: 2009-01-13 | ID: 2378 | 3/10
![]()
Hi, I would like to thank Jon Stevens from Nottinghamshire. I had the same problem with starting with clutch and start button. I have had a look around clutch pedal and have noticed a wire has broken off . So I am going to put wire back in place.
Submitted: 2009-01-12 | ID: 2377 | 5/10
![]()
I had a Clio 1.2 8 valve 2006 model - good trade in offer - bought 2008 sport version. It is much nicer inside - better instruments, alloys CD radio; the other one was good, this is better in every way except it has not got map pockets?? Does slightly better mpg; perhaps the mpg meter helps and the acceleration is better. Good road holding, good brakes very pleased overall - Jeremy Clarkson will probably sneer but he has got the BBC licence payer to pay for his motoring!
Submitted: 2009-01-12 | ID: 2367 | 4/10
![]()
Have leased this car for 3 years, luckily I can hand it back in 2009 - thank god I didn’t buy it. This car has been an absolute nightmare, has been in the garage more times that I can count. Roof continues to leak even though I have been assured on at least 3 occasions that this fault has been rectified. Water was leaking in from driver’s side but after roof was realigned it is now leaking in from passenger side. Was told by Renault that if car was parked on a slope when water leaking, that this is then not a manufacturing fault. I then asked what about when driving round corners and when water comes in, got no reply to this question!! Inside door handles have had to be replaced due to chipping, carpet in footwell has been glued down on at least 4 occasions, alarm keeps going off when raining, gear stick numbers have worn off. Was advised not to wear rings, I would never recommend this car to anyone and am only glad that I can hand it back.
Submitted: 2008-12-30 | ID: 2323 | 1/10
![]()
I bought a brand new van 26 Oct 2008 and have already driven over 8000 miles. Fantastic drive, very comfortable and am getting over 31mpg which, considering I’m a courier is very good! Much more than my trusty old Sprinter! Driving position and seats are excellent, gearbox is a bit sloppy but the 6 speed is really nice. Good overall torque and performance especially when loaded! Excellent handling even down nasty country lanes, smooth and quite on the motorways too! Have noticed a few rust spots and runs in paint - will mention this to garage but Kent is not frozen all the time so am not throwing my teddy in the corner over it! As I did with all previous vans I will do weekly checks and get the van serviced on time - do this and life is easy!!! It’s a work van at the end of the day!
Submitted: 2008-12-30 | ID: 2322 | 4/10
![]()
I have had problems with egr valve - manifold over pressurising fault - loss of power fault until turbo kicks in and handbrake sticking when weather is very cold. Lucky I have equipment to fix it or else god knows how much it would have cost. But... when it runs right its ok to drive, its permanently at max weight as I carry tools all the time, the brakes could do with being more powerful, and the engine has not got enough torque when not in turbo range but when i first got the van and it was empty it drove brilliantly. It also drove well at about 75% capacity but any more and it struggles. It seems that all modern vans are the same; too much electronics to go wrong for nothing and cost an arm and a leg to fix if you can’t do it yourself and if you can you end up with a headache, that goes for you to Mr Mercedes and you Henry Ford; bring back the old Transit - it may have been slow and noisy but it always worked.
Responses to this review
Can you tell me how you sorted out the loss of power ’til turbo kicked in as I have that problem? Thanks - Ger Whelan from Middlesex
Submitted: 2008-12-30 | ID: 2318 | 3/10
![]()
Its a renault - what do you expect?
Submitted: 2008-12-23 | ID: 2304 | 1/10
![]()
WARNING! When Renault increased the power of the 1.9 diesel engine from 120 to 130 bhp they put a particle filter in the exhaust system to clean up the emissions. This meant the service intervals increased from 18,000 to 9,000 miles. Special oil has to be used, which costs �50 for 5 litres. But worst of all, if the car isn’t used on regular long journeys or you don’t take the car for a long run at high speed when the Particle Filter warning light comes on, the car locks down to 3,000 rpm. This means that you have to take the car to a Renault dealer to have a �300 procedure carried out to clear the filter. If this doesn’t work a new filter costs �1,000! Yes that’s right, �1,000! Plus fitting! I know because I bought one at auction without knowing any of this. Luckily I managed to return the car when I found out it was put into the auction against the auction company’s terms. This is an absolute travesty. As these cars come out of warranty the situation will come into focus more and I hope the outcry will cause Renault to sort this out. Such a shame as the car is beautiful.
Responses to this review
This was on the older 1.9 dCi engines. Renault have used the new 2.0 dCi engines since the model change. There is a choice of normal or FAP engine also. Your problem with the engine is your use of the car, not the FAP. FAP fitted engines are cleaner to the environment for people who do a lot of motorway driving. They produce lower CO2 emissions and return a better fuel economy. I doubt Renault will change the situation. I simply suggest you find out more about the car you buy in the future - Martin McKeeman from Scotland
I write in defence of the Renault Laguna Hatch. I own a 2L Dci Dyman. I bought it new in 2006 and covered over 48,000 miles at 46mpg with no problems. Like all cars, if look after THEM they will look after YOU i.e. service when due. And do not blame the car when "YOU" did not do any research before parting with your ill-gotten gains! - Steve Watson from Cumberland
I had one of these 130bhp 1.9 diesel lagunas with the same problem. If the light come on drive the car at a reasonable speed (over 60) in 5th until the light extinguishes. I found I had to drive it over 60 miles before that happened but that is a lot cheaper than a garage who force it out, not to be recommended. Try it, I can assure you it does work - Derek Moffitt from County Down
Submitted: 2008-12-22 | ID: 2298 | 1/10
![]()
I had the same problem but I had a rattle so, being under warranty I took it to Renault and they told me it was the dual mass fly wheel making the rattle so they took it in only to find out my van had a solid fly wheel - do they know what there on about? I thought they would of checked the serial number on the van first? So they put it all back together with a new clutch & master cylinder & wanted £1000. I told them they got me in the garage under false pretences & only paid £200 - never trust main dealers. I have a 54 plate that carries its maximum wait every day and I get around 42 mpg which I think is pretty good... and I don’t hang around.
Submitted: 2008-12-12 | ID: 2254 | 4/10
![]()
Bought new March 08. It sits outside in all weathers and gets cleaned in a car wash (occasionally). No leaks, in fact no problems of any sort, now on 16400 miles. Regularly gets 47-53 mpg. Complaints - none. Wish list - that the back seats folded down.
Submitted: 2008-12-08 | ID: 2229 | 5/10
![]()
The Renault Megane CC is a beautiful car to look at with its sleek lines, but is it really a car for the UK? So far mine has been in the garage 18 times for various faults and is due back in again next week! Yes, it drives beautifully but is very high maintenance. Headspace is limited, although seat height can be adjusted to suit. Great centre console/armrest for storing your SatNav or CD’s. The automatic features like headlights and windscreen wipers can be a bit hit and miss so DON’T rely on them! Contrary to popular opinion you don’t need a wind deflector when the roof is down in this car. If I had a chance to buy this car again I would probably pass and go for a better quality model like an Audi.
Submitted: 2008-12-08 | ID: 2226 | 3/10
![]()
Hi, I bought a Trafic DCi 100 LWB, my first new van. It seems to go through airflow meters - an average of 25k each time. I had wiring loom under bonnet replaced - most things covered by the good warranty they have. Fuel economy ranges between 38 and 44mpg, the most I’ve had is 780miles to a full tank. I got 74,000 miles out of rear pads and 87,000 out of the front. It has now turned 3 years old and has 180,000 miles on it and still no real problems. I was going to renew but the resale I was offered was £1500 - so keeping it for the moment. This van runs part loaded at 2750kgs all the time since new. Anyone thinking about getting one - I would definitely recommend.
Submitted: 2008-12-08 | ID: 2225 | 5/10
![]()
Got rid of under powered Volkswagen Transporter 2.5 tdi to buy Trafic 140 in February 2005. Climbing mountains whilst working in Europe, Transit was a dog whilst loaded with tools, Renault was a dream. Last year at 20,000miles major service, new track rod ends. Warned that brakes were 50% worn. This year problems with turbo-lag. Foot down; then wait a bit, not good when starting from lights etc... Fuel consumption up, major flat spot at approximately 30mph. No signs of problems on computer read out . Going in the shop Monday the 8th of December 2008 for full service and checks. Relatively low mileage of 37K.
Submitted: 2008-12-03 | ID: 2217 | 2/10
![]()
Hi readers, just to let you know. I got my van back; great so I thought. The garage told me that they had painted the car all over - this was a lot of lies - all they had done was use a paint brush and painted straight over the rust now the van looks worse than before. I am now very angry and all the sanding down was done with a course sand paper and not smooth so now the van also has big sandpaper scratches all over the car. I went back to the garage ready to kill someone; these people are like time-share salesmen - always telling a pack of lies. I have a meeting with the owner of the garage and now doing TV and newspaper reports for any readers wanting to buy a new van. I would not recommend it. If you could see the state of my van with your eyes you would run a mile from Renault.
Submitted: 2008-11-28 | ID: 2203 | 1/10
![]()
Hi readers - just to let you know that my van has been back in the garage for the last four days and no one has contacted me yet to let me know what is happening to my rust bucket of a new van. I am very angry with the customer service of all the Renault garages so I have contacted customers rights and try to get in contact with radio and TV companies to forward my complaints. These people who work in these garages need a good kick in the back side.
Submitted: 2008-11-25 | ID: 2181 | 2/10
![]()
I have been very impressed with the new Clio. We had the car for two years from new and not a single trip to the dealer except for a smashed wing mirror after a bus decided to overtake a little to close. I am 6" tall and the car feels really roomy up front, more so than the previous model. Would recommend the Dymanique trim over the cheaper models as it looks and feels a really good quality interior. The 1.4 is giving us an average of 36mpg which is ok, but considering power is limited I hoped it would be a little more frugal. The new 1.2 Turbo looks a great choice so would opt for that if buying again. With two child seats in the back, the middle seat is very tight, but the boot is deceptively big and even with a pram etc stuffed in, always had enough room for a normal shop. I really can’t find anything to fault on the car - it’s just lovely to drive with good road holding and a nice quality cabin. Just in the process of upgrading to a Scenic for extra space for the kids but everyday I still have the Clio I feel sad that it’s going - I really will miss this lovely car.
Submitted: 2008-11-21 | ID: 2179 | 5/10
![]()
You can talk as long as you wish, but this is the best commercial vehicle I have ever drive (this is not just mine suppose) !!!!! Good performance, little consumption, very very comfortable vehicle, you can enjoy in drive like in much expensive vehicles!!!!! There was no bigger problems at all, just drive your Trafic in service regularly to regularly services and there will be no problems, and drive him normally with enjoy!! p.s. try to put chip with 30% more power, and enjoy, it’s less consumption, I have this chip more then 2 years and I’m very pleased! ;-)
Submitted: 2008-11-17 | ID: 2161 | 5/10
![]()
To start with I owned a 1.4 mk 11 for 2 years (03) and put 34000 on the clock - very very little trouble with it. I liked the style until I saw the Grand Scenic. I don’t care much for the 5 seater Scenic with the sticky out rear end but the Grand seems to loose it! I’ve had my Grand for just one week, 1 owner, 19000 on the clock - it’s a 1.6 vvt authentic, 7 seats with a/c, I like the colour which is why I bought it (ottoman blue). The road handling is superb with true grip. I like it, the wife likes it and so do the kids. The only gripes I have so far is there are no speakers in the rear doors which I’ve now put in. Also the rear fog lights or should I say light. It seems that they (Renault) only wire up the offside and stick a bulb in the nearside holder, but given time I will get round to rectify it. Overall I like what I’ve got , give me a month or two to see if any thing has changed...
Submitted: 2008-11-12 | ID: 2143 | 4/10
![]()
Had the van brand new 2005. Good driving position and quite comfortable to drive and in my opinion looks pretty good. Not that good on fuel though! Probably about 22-25 mpg. Had no problems at all with van until yesterday when clutch peddle fell to the floor and I was unable to drive home. Towed to garage by my mate (same van as me, no problems up to yet!) where mechanic says they will have to drop engine out to see what has gone wrong. Sounds like it is going to be an expensive job!!! Van has done 30,000 miles.
Submitted: 2008-11-10 | ID: 2131 | 4/10
![]()
I have just bought a brand new Renault Trafic on the 26 of October 2008. The following day I was washing my van and I noticed there was already rust on the roof so I went back to the dealership and they were not very helpful and they are thinking about spray painting the roof again but now I have noticed there is rust everywhere on the van - how could this car be able to be sold like this or even allowed to leave the garage in this state? Why should I accept the van to be spray painted and all the rust sanded out when the car is brand new. So, I am trying to get a new van which I think I am owed. At the moment I am talking to lawyers so stay tuned.
Submitted: 2008-11-05 | ID: 2116 | 5/10
![]()
I did not realise this site existed until I searched for Megane CC faults this morning as I had been given the impression that I was the only owner who was having a problem with water leaks. I bought my first Megane CC in November 2005, had black leather seats and bluetooth installed. By January 2006 the front passenger seat was stained due to water leaks. Over the following 2 years the car spent 21 weeks in the garage with Renault specialists looking at it regularly. The garage did not charge me for a courtesy car but my insurance got a bit fed up with me adding another car and started to charge me, it was also usually a maximum of 1.4 petrol where I was used to driving a 1.9 diesel. In the end I requested a hire car of equivalent power which was usually a Peugeot 407 but on 2 occasions during the summer months I was given a Megane CC. I was in constant contact with Renault UK Customer Services and in February this year they offered to change the car. The first offer was I pay £6000 towards a new one! In May I took delivery of a September 07 registered Renault to GO car which had 12k mile on the clock, no leather seats but they did install Bluetooth for me. I considered this a good deal as my other car by that time had 36k miles on the clock and only 6 months left on the warranty. The car also seemed jinxed as I had had 5 punctures, with no spare tyre, a new front screen and the first accident I have ever had in 35 years of driving, I aquaplaned and collided with a lamp post in an almost empty car park. I have been happy with the new car and have even stopped looking for the water to flow or drip in as I pull away. This weekend we have had high winds and heavy rain and as I pulled the car out of the drive the water flowed in onto the front passenger seat. I am off to Renault today. On the leather seats you just wiped the water away but with the fabric the water soaks into the seat so my passenger is going to get a wet derrieres. With the exception of the leak which becomes very frustrating and time wasting having to keep going back to the garage to complain, although they do collect and deliver it when it goes in for work, I love the car. It is great to drive and very economical and providing it is dry and above 6 I have the roof down.
Submitted: 2008-11-03 | ID: 2105 | 4/10
![]()
Great car! I have an Auto Scenic 2.0 Dynamique petrol which is average of 30mpg. Great car have had 2 in 5 years but prefer the old shape. There is a drive shaft problem with the autos - it pulls to the right when I accelerate, anyone else have this issue? Lots of space for 3 kids and the dog! The auto gearbox can be a bit juddery when accelerating up hill, but great on flat. I have 2 sun roofs which work well and all over vision means I do not miss anyone on the road. Secret compartments in passenger seats great for the kids junk. I have driven through France last year with great ease. Seats are so comfortable that after 3 hours driving I did not ache when getting out like lower model cars. Excellent safety features with air bags in crucial sites, making me feel safe when travelling with the whole family in tow. Air con works efficiently and clears the screen in seconds on cold days. Mine has only done 53K so am waiting for the services to be expensive. One issue is when the coils went all four had to be replaced and not just a pair which happened in my old Y reg one. A good all round family car with enough storage and comfort and extras for any family whatever their ages. Might switch to a diesel for economics looking at other reports for this car.
Submitted: 2008-10-29 | ID: 2087 | 3/10
![]()
Just bought a Clio campus sport. Having had a Clio in the past I new what I was getting. The level of trim is good but do miss headlamp sensor and rain sensor which was on the last model which was a dynamique model. Love the sporty seats... Ride is good... very cheap to run. All in all fun little car.
Submitted: 2008-10-27 | ID: 2075 | 5/10
![]()
Just bought a 58 plate Renault Clio Campus, the accelerator had the same problem as Charlotte. Have had the problem fixed by having a longer (universal, non Renault part) accelerator cable fitted and given a three year warranty on the part by the dealer.
Submitted: 2008-10-22 | ID: 2057 | 4/10
![]()
Second Scenic, had a old shape automatic, which was suppose to be troublesome. Mine was great, the only thing that went was the auto gearbox sensor inside the car, which wasn’t expensive. I love my newer one, great drive, and spacious. It does have the usual FRENCH electrics niggles, but hey ho, every one of the 5 or so Renault’s I have had, also did. I find Renaults have a fit one day, and then behave for months after, got a mind of their own. I owned a lot of Ford Granada’s previously, and they were quite troublesome, engines, head gaskets, oil burners. Cars aren’t perfect, but I would have another Scenic tomorrow.
Submitted: 2008-10-21 | ID: 2046 | 4/10
![]()
Had a test drive of a new diesel auto today (in Adelaide, Australia - but it’s not on the list). A nice, functional car to drive. It reminded me of when I first drove the Landrover Freelander a few years ago (don’t panic, I’m sure it is far more reliable than those hunks of junk - I can say this, I owned one). The Koleos is a very adequate, pleasant to drive SUV which seemed to handle the around town driving and the open road quite well. However I’ll reserve any further judgement on handling until I drive the preferred Manual Diesel next week. Cabin space and seating room is exceptional, and that tail gate thingy is pretty cool. The wife is ready to trade our Disco II in for one right now.
Submitted: 2008-10-20 | ID: 2033 | 4/10
![]()
This is the worst new car we could have bought. We bought the car new in 2006 and have had absolutely nothing but problems with it. From the surprise of no spare wheel and being stuck at the roadside for a day, the inflating tyre cans did not work either. Oh, the roof leaks too and the more the garage looks at it the worse it gets. Within weeks it was back at the dealers with a problem that virtually takes all the power from the engine. Something to do with an emissions filter. It’s impossible to clear this yourself, Renault’s recommendations for this are that you drive around 500 miles at more than 50 miles an hour to heat it up sufficiently in order to clear it out . Apparently, Renault say themselves that we were mis-sold the car by their main dealers and our leasing company , the Bank of Scotland. They say it would be better with a sales rep. I think even they would find it impossible to own. Anyhow, the main dealer every now and then will agree to regenerate this filter to sort it out but the problem is only solved for weeks before the light comes back on. They even have to get permission from Renault to do this and say it can be done only a certain number of times. To top this they say that the clutch replacement and dual mass fly wheel needed is not under the 3 year warranty and is wear and tear cost £2,500. Whilst we have independent engineer evidence that this is caused by these engine problems, what with the difficulty getting up hills, changing gear, and engine malfunction in the blasted thing, you only get ridicule and insults and denials from the people at Renault on this and we fully intend to issue a county court summons against them very soon. Never buy a Renault, just horrible people to deal with.!!!!!!! We are considering preparing a web site displaying all the problems we have had with this car.
Submitted: 2008-10-20 | ID: 2032 | 1/10
![]()
This is my first Renault and to be honest I was not sure to expect. But after collecting the vehicle from Essex and driving it back to the Wirral on less than a 1/4 tank of diesel, my first impressions grew. Needless to say after a few weeks the little annoying faults started to materialise such as a squeak / rattle from the centre console, especially on tick over also the GPS element of the sat nav does not operate. But over all I am impressed with the performance and economy of the 1.9dci engine whereby I am returning anything between 675 miles and 750 miles per tank, admittedly majority of this is motorway driving. Regarding comfort levels again the Laguna is very comfy on both short journeys and long journeys including an 8 hour drive to Paris. The only downside is the boot area as this can be restrictive when carrying high items as the height level from the floor to the roof lining is not the best in its class. If anyone is contemplating buying a Laguna, then I suggest you go for it as you get a lot of gadgets (no cup holders though at the front) good performance whilst bringing good economical figures for your money... good luck.
Submitted: 2008-10-15 | ID: 2018 | 4/10
![]()
First venture into Renault. Love the car. Roof leaked on drivers side when first bought but on contacting Renault was advised to park facing downhill! (I was parked facing uphill on my drive.) Guess what? No leak since!! As the yanks say, ’Go figure’. Petrol is a little slow in 1600 format but it is quite a heavy car so would imagine 2000 would be much better. Rear n/s passenger window packed up via individual switch but works on ’all window’ switch. Not sure whether I would but another one. It’s a Renault after all. Always had Toyota so I’ve been spoilt with reliability!
Responses to this review
I have exactly the same problem. My car leaks on both sides through the top of the window seals, there’s a thick teatowel constantly left on my drivers side seat every night and replaced when it rains. My driver’s side rear window has also packed in but works when you put all four windows down, it’s a nightmare (especially when we get so much rain). I’m not sure what to do about it, because in every review on here the dealers seem to be of no help whatsoever!!! Does any one have any contact numbers in order to sort this leaking problem out please? North Wales Denbighshire area. Thanks - Kim from Denbighshire
Submitted: 2008-10-15 | ID: 2016 | 4/10
![]()
I have a fault in the braking system. I have got about an inch of play in the pedal and then the brake bites making the car tilt forward. I have tried a neighbours scenic and the pedal goes down smoothly.
Submitted: 2008-10-14 | ID: 2009 | 1/10
![]()
Had van since new and done 225000 miles only - new gearbox and put clutch in as part. Of course it has had many different drivers; used on farm and motorway work and been worked very hard. Only let us down once - fantastic vans!
Responses to this review
We have a pair of 2008 Masters, one a LWB 120 (2.5 ltr), the other a MWB 100 (2.5ltr as well). Both on 80,000, both excellent. We ran a 2005 LWB high top for 185,000 trouble free miles and I still wonder why we ever replaced it. Superb vans - highly recommended - John Miller from Herefordshire
I bought an ’07 Master 150bhp not too long ago with 62k on the clock and all i can say is I’m sorry I ever laid eyes on the pile of scrap. It has been nothing but trouble since I got it. Fault lights keep coming on the dash and losing power, running on limp mode, and now I’ve been told that there is a whine coming out of first and second gear and the gear box could be on the way out - Greg from Ireland
Submitted: 2008-10-08 | ID: 1976 | 5/10
![]()
Purchased new - noticed pools of water on front passenger seat first time it rained. Vehicle returned to dealership for repair. Front leak fixed but vehicle came back with two leaks to the rear. After eight visits to the dealership to repair the problem Renault have decided that it is a tolerance that cannot be fixed and I will have to put up with a leaking roof. I am now seeking legal advice as I am not prepared to be tolerant and accept this decision.
Submitted: 2008-10-07 | ID: 1974 | 1/10
![]()
Brilliant, reliable car and its quite good on fuel with plenty of space. It’s a good car people say, ha its French, but look at Peugeot but it’s quite a good car too. I would give Renault 5 stars for looks and space and safety. It’s the first Renault I have driven because I always liked Vauxhall but it is a good drive - just make sure you give it an annual service every year and it will last you for life .
Responses to this review
Personally I think PSA Peugeot Citroen are great cars, not so much Renault because they are awful. Im looking to replace my excellent 407 and I thought about the Laguna but after being warned by numerous amounts of people I’m not going near them. I think I might go for the new Citroen C5, it’s a lovely car to drive and own, I have heard non stop praise on how good they are. Out off the 3 french brands I wouldnt go near a Renault - Kieran from County Tyrone
Submitted: 2008-09-26 | ID: 1936 | 5/10
![]()
I bought this just over a year ago and must admit I have been pleased. That is until I took it for it’s MOT and service. £1142 all told and that is without the 2 tyres I needed. Collapsed shaft bearings, brake disc and drive belt on a car I had owned for less than a year and have never driven off road (it’s a 4x4). It only has 35000 miles on the clock. So, boo to Renault and their chocolate car parts.
Submitted: 2008-09-26 | ID: 1935 | 2/10
![]()
Having just purchased a new 58 reg Clio Campus I am enjoying it but was wondering if anyone was having problems with the accelerator pedal being jerky when depressed slowly. Renault have assured me this is the case with all new Clio’s but I would appreciate any feedback or other opinions.
Submitted: 2008-09-25 | ID: 1932 | 4/10
![]()
Purchased this car in July absolutely lovely, champagne colour. Roof is panoramic and draws looks no end when down. Have developed horrendous squeel when reverse brake engaged. Any idea why? Garage says dust but is really annoying. Any tips would be grateful.
Submitted: 2008-09-17 | ID: 1901 | 4/10
![]()
This car is just great - 55+mpg, roof up and down in seconds. OK so what about roof leaks you ask? A drip or two following torrential rain as you set off in the morning - but nothing else. It’s a cabriolet; I think even the best and most expensive German ones could be given that. Totally recommended and a real tax beating bargain too.
Submitted: 2008-09-08 | ID: 1862 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had my new CC since early July. So far, I’m extremely happy with it - the only thing that’s putting a downer is the weather. As for the spec, I currently have the Privilege edition. Features include the following: Electric folding mirrors Auto dimming rear view mirror Lumbar support on both front seats Upgraded brakes (Think they take the Scenic ones) Xenon Headlights Cream / Beige leather interior Remote Keyless Entry / Start 6CD Changer and Standard CD Player Automatic (!!! essential for this type of car!) Automatic wipers Cruise Control / Speed limiter Fog lights etc etc, the list goes on!!!! Standard radio lacks mp3 cd support (come on Renault, it’s 2007 model!!) Overall, extremely pleased about it. Regarding the leaking roofs guys, I suggest you look at the other cars in the cabriolet section. EOS’s, MX5’s, A4’s etc ALL LEAK. It’s not just the frenchies! :)
Submitted: 2008-09-04 | ID: 1856 | 5/10
![]()
I bought the car as a Renault to go car at around 13000miles, and it has done 48000 now. The car came with a glass roof, rain sensor, closing wing mirrors and remote key as added extras. So was well kitted. I was concerned about electrical problems I had read about, but I have not experienced these. Other than servicing which is 24months or 18000miles I have no problems with the car. I needed new front Discs and pads at its last service at around 46000miles, but am told this is normal, and the first set of tyres lasted to around 28000miles. The car does everything I need, and it can hold a remarkable amount as an estate, and drives in comfort, and gives a secure feel to the drive. It drives swiftly enough for my needs and can cruise at high speed if I wanted. It has good acceleration, and the 130 is even better. It gives me about 48MPG average. Reasonable on road tax, and insurance, and it has a high crash protection kite mark which is important to me and also has a quiet ride. The main downside for me is that the rear seats do not completely fold down, and if I need to has a totally flat load bay, then the seat section needs to be removed, and this is an awkward activity. This is the first car I have bought for some considerable years, as during them I run company cars, ranging across Citroen, Peugeot, but the last cars were a Volkswagen Passatt Estate and Audi A4 Avant. Surprisingly this Renault delivers equally if not better in a number of areas for a much less price. Recommended.
Responses to this review
Submitted: 2008-09-03 | ID: 1844 | 4/10
![]()
I like the colour Quartz Gold, looks good with roof down or closed. However lots of bad luck and problems since buying June 2006. I have replaced 2 wiper motors, new windscreen due to bad chipping. Done 28000 miles now and clutch has gone. I have 3 year warranty and yes it won’t cover new clutch - I was told wear and tear and must pay £567 to my Renault Dealer. Also replaced 4 tyres - £400. Windscreen needs replacing again - another big stone hit it. Dent to rear left side someone in a car park hit my car and drove off, slight damage, thanks to that dishonest person, hope it happens to them. My niece also reversed into back of vehicle slight damage scratches £340 to respray bumper. Lucky White Heather eh? I will be changing to BMW, more reliable and better quality and hopefully luckier.
Submitted: 2008-09-01 | ID: 1840 | 3/10
![]()
Excellent car - holds road and drives superbly. Plenty of punch, comfort *****, solid vehicle - will buy another. Sun-roof, full length audio system - great. Had a year now - no problems.
Submitted: 2008-08-28 | ID: 1830 | 5/10
![]()
This was my second Trafic - the first has major fuel system problems (2 new fuel pumps, new injectors, new tank, new alternator, new power steering pump etc etc) but as the dealers were very good I tried a Renault again. Unfortunately this one has had major problems also. As the back brakes were sticking (after being checked 6 times at the dealers), it required 2 new back disks and pads. Just before the warranty expired, it wasn’t starting just as it should for a few months and I thought it was just needing a service (which was due soon). About 2 months after the warranty ran out, it was getting really difficult to start so I had a quick look on the web at the forums - it seemed that it might be a problem with the TDC sensor - a common problem seemingly and about £100 to fix. I put it into the Renault dealer and they said it was a faulty injector at £440 to fix. I complained to Renault UK who eventually said they would cover 50% of the cost as it was just out of warranty. Unfortunately, the cylinder head was destroyed (somehow) and (all of a sudden) the 4 injectors were faulty. It ended up costing (with the 50%) discount over £1,500 to put right. Now a few months later, the clutch is slipping and the water pump is leaking and there is an oil leak from somewhere (I think oil is leaking onto the clutch). I have given Renault 2 tries by buying 2 new vans but although they are nice to drive they are quite greedy on fuel and seem to be catastrophically unreliable. Please also note that both vans did break down because of the EGR valve at least once and had to be towed home. I am never buying another Renault.
Responses to this review
I have a 57 Trafic. In the past month I have had 2 fuel injectors fitted and I’ve only had the van 6 months. The dealership customer service is a joke - Mr from Scotland
Submitted: 2008-08-26 | ID: 1824 | 1/10
![]()
The van is a year old and has done 18,000 miles without a problem. Comfy to drive; great with fuel; only downside is the lwb version isn’t that long. Could have done with being just that little bit longer. Value for money though and I will be buying another in 3 years time.
Submitted: 2008-08-26 | ID: 1822 | 5/10
![]()
Absolutely brilliant little car. I had the Clio Dynamique 1.2 16v for two years, unfortunately after flipping it 4 times it is understandably but unfortunately a write off. I walked out the car with one bruise on my body, the paramedics could not believe i did not have any serious injuries. I am definitely looking for another Clio. The car is sturdy, safe, trustworthy, quiet to drive and had 37,000 faultless miles, had every extra that you could think of apart from a soft top of course! Comfortable sports seats, adjustable radio/CD player on steering wheel, automatic locking system when you drive off, so your safe, which is important with being a young girl. I cannot fault this vehicle as it saved my life and I dread to think what would have happened if I had been in a Peugeot or MG soft-top! Without a doubt I would recommend this car to anyone; especially first time buyers.
Submitted: 2008-08-22 | ID: 1807 | 4/10
![]()
Very comfortable ride, fuel average return is 48mpg to date. Renault engineers need to provide more legroom for rear seat passengers and the gearbox needs the engineering of Fords’ gearbox for slick changes. It would then be a good class leader.
Submitted: 2008-08-21 | ID: 1797 | 3/10
![]()
My first new car for 8 years and very pleased so far except for having NO SPARE WHEEL. Dealer says the two "emergency" spray cans in the boot will reflate a punctured tyre to get you to the nearest garage. What happens if you’re on a motorway miles from anywhere? Asked for a quote for a spare wheel but no response so far. Not good enough, Renault, you are spoiling the ship for a ha’porth of tar!
Responses to this review
Always check the spec before you buy! No sympathy at all mate - John Rowe from Flintshire Test - test from Devon
Submitted: 2008-08-11 | ID: 1763 | 4/10
![]()
Well just to give an update. These notes were left in the car which says this publication is confidential for use by Renault franchise network. So going by what is on the notes Renault have known that they have a fault with some of there cars. RENAULT UK TYPE: MEGANE 11 COUPE CABRIOLET WATER INGRESS FROM A PILLAR SEAL. Anyway, it gives details of how to repair the problem with the leaking roof which involves the seal not bonding to the mastic strips due to the excessive depth of the flange. Anyway, it also notes that the working area MUST be protected against metal debris during adjustment. Low and behold - I go and pick my car up with metal filings all over the interior of the car the seats and doors all covered in grease and my passenger door paintwork damaged. Absolutely livid and am now waiting on them putting that right.
Submitted: 2008-08-11 | ID: 1762 | 2/10
![]()
Where do I start? My father has owned Renault cars for many years which prompted me to buy a Traffic. I got it at 18 months old 19250 miles. First day out the power steering pump fell off 2 miles from home, was towed to local garage to be told that warranty was void cause it had missed first service. To cut a long story short I had to threaten dealers with newspaper before they agreed to foot the bill, next thing severe over revving when dipping clutch to change gear, was told this was normal for common rail diesel engines to run - what a load of bo????ks - change of dealer time, to cut another story, 7 trips to Renault at 36 quid each on the machine, intermittent fault that’s cancelled when ignition is switched off. After leaving it with them to look at again whilst in for a service was told that there was a known fault known by Renault and they agreed to do it under warranty (although they hadn’t actually witnessed it). Collect van to see it over revving before I got it out of the car park - took it straight back in which a mechanic came out with me on a test but because I’d had the ignition off it had reset itself. Eventually the mechanic spotted it whilst in car park when we got back and took it straight in whilst I was told to go to reception. 1.5 hours later I was told that the main mechanic was now on the case (now I aint been funny but why the hell wasn’t he on from day one) - 45 mins later was given my keys and told it was done, was also told the computer had finally picked up the problem and it was showing the the pressure switch on the back of the clutch was faulty but he had just changed it, it turned out to be a loose wire on the van side of the switch but I was reassured that I was not going to be charged for the computer - wupeedddo - what about all the other 36 quids????????????????? and the last rant as about the fuel economy or lack of it I was informed that these vans would do 40 to a gallon - what another load of boll???s The guy that recorded that lie must of sat on a oval test track at 55mph in 6th gear because I’ve tested it in many ways, full, empty, loaded, unloaded, driven steady, absolutely caned and the best I ever got was 29 miles to the gallon. To which after buying was told by dealer that that wasn’t bad for a van of its size, tuck up like a kipper should have kept my old Iveco, reason for looking on this forum? Turbo and gear linkage has just gone another hire van on go they love me down there regards AND PS I WOULD NEVER BUY ANOTHER RENAULT
Responses to this review
Sounds wonderful. Now my traffic clutch is making a clunking noise when depressed. Now I’m depressed. This b thing is costing me a bomb ever since I have had it - Tim Dale from Devon
Submitted: 2008-07-31 | ID: 1724 | 1/10
![]()
I love my Black CC to bits! But it has been in several times now for a leaking roof over the passenger seat. The RENAULT Dealer told me that they have measured the distance between windscreen and top roof section whilst roof is open and it falls short of standard??? So it needs a complete new roof fitting. And wait for it... I must take it in to an approved dealer in Stockport to have it done and hire a courtesy car? The car was bought from new so will be onto trading standards pronto...
Submitted: 2008-07-21 | ID: 1694 | 4/10
![]()
Just bought a 57 plate registered in October 07, 6 miles on the clock and guess what.... a leaking roof. I was not to happy so went back to dealer and they wanted to charge me £11 per day for a courtesy car while waiting to get it fixed. It is a 1.9 diesel and if it was not for the roof I would be happy. I also did not get a spare wheel with the car which I find strange (anybody else get a spare?). It is pretty quiet for a diesel and run is smooth.
Submitted: 2008-07-11 | ID: 1660 | 2/10
![]()
My first MPV Renault. A lovely car to drive and lots of space. Unfortunately comes with lots of problems, I had to have the coils (all 4) replaced 3 times, I have spent £1000 on repairs in 3 months, cam belt, water pump, drive shaft, constant problems since it was 2 years old. I won’t buy another - I don’t like the new shape anyway.
Submitted: 2008-07-02 | ID: 1619 | 2/10
![]()
It has been a great little car in many aspects. The one huge gripe I have though is that it goes through rear tires like there is no tomorrow. After 60.000 miles and 6 set of tyres I think I will not be buying another. John Greig
Submitted: 2008-06-30 | ID: 1614 | 2/10
![]()
Last of the old shape, bought new. Nice & roomy, lots of little useless storage. Finish & trim cheap & cheerful, some bits like washer bottle broke/release lever for middle rear seat broke/ dodgy rear wiper in 1st couple of years Renault unable to fix under warranty, just put up with them now. Half suede trim does not wear at all well, driver's seat wrecked. Engine management trouble twice - once fixed under warranty, once £200 to fix. Overall OK but wouldn't buy another.
Submitted: 2008-06-26 | ID: 1604 | 3/10
![]()
I’m really impressed with this car. It’s pitched at the mid-market ’family car’ end of which there is loads of choice, but I think it feels a notch above. I have had Saabs previously but frankly I prefer this at 60% of the cost! It’s a 130hp diesel and goes ***** well! Overtaking is really brisk for a 1.9 litre and it cruises at about 2,500 rpm/80mph which keeps the fuel bills down nicely. The suspension is nicely set up where you don’t dread the potholes, and it sticks to the road fine. It’s got all the toys you need except Climate Control but the manual a/c is fine really. Oddly I miss the rain sensitive wipers my previous Primera had but it doesn’t keep me awake at night! It’s not a huge car but unless you’ve got a big family or need to cart loads of stuff around a lot I can’t imagine you’d have any problems with space. It’s a bit of a Tardis! Everything else is covered as you’d expect from a car in the ’noughties’, let’s face it, it’s quite hard to find a really bad car these days. I lease mine, but I think it costs about �17,000 to buy. Not the cheapest car by a long way but I think it represents good value against other makes. It feels as well built as a Golf (the benchmark still). It must be safe (it’s a Renault) and to be honest I can only think brand snobbery should stop you getting one over a Volvo S40 estate or Audi A3 5dr. Renault have never been considered particularly ’posh’ but this car feels really well sorted. I’m converted, Thought I might treat myself to a Laguna next time, but this actually is big enough!
Responses to this review
The water coming through the door was a known fault and Renault sorted it for free on mine. It was the door skin liner. Might be worth asking as they may still offer the upgrade - Simon H from Somerset
Submitted: 2008-06-25 | ID: 1601 | 5/10
![]()
Absolutely brilliant. Had the car for 9 months now & no problems. Summer’s here again & I just cannot wait. Get amazing responses to the drop down roof, soo quick & easy. Handling pretty good too.
Submitted: 2008-06-25 | ID: 1600 | 5/10
![]()
Hi, I’ve got squeaky brakes on my Renault Megane CC, it’s a 2006 model. Has anyone managed to get the brakes changed under warranty? By the way I’ve purchased the extended warranty also.
Submitted: 2008-06-16 | ID: 1559 | 4/10
![]()
An excellent family car, plenty of room and boot space. Good looking car and interior, nice to drive and quick for a 1.4 16v - all i need for mainly around town driving. Problem with squeaking front brakes, car only has 5000 miles on the clock. Will be taking it into Renault and expect it repaired under warranty as it seems to be a common fault that Renault are aware of. Had a problem with an annoying noise when heater fans were on - turned out the pollen filter was full of leaves, surely with how long they’ve been building cars - this is the basics of good workmanship - why can leaves enter parts of the car mechanics ? After 2 weeks there was a strong smell of fish in the car, turned out it was something to do with the aircon - after having the aircon cleaned out twice - all has been ok, not what you expect when you buy a new car. My last car was a Clio, overall i am happy with Renault cars - no serious faults, just daft little things.
Submitted: 2008-06-13 | ID: 1556 | 4/10
![]()
Bought my Megane cabriolet, top of the range with bells and whistles in July 2005 so am nearing the end of the warranty period... and I’m dreading it! I’ve lost track of the number of times it’s been back with the leaking roof (alarm goes off if it rains, passenger side windows won’t work until they dry out etc... etc...) and the howling brakes when reversing - this is a known fault apparently but Renault don’t know how to fix it yet on the Megane cabriolet - I ring up every few months to check (there is a fix for the Scenic apparently because another irate Renault customer told me about it). The Renault UK customer services desk have assured me that the car is safe (interesting if they don’t actually know how to fix the fault so presumably don’t know the cause!) - but I have passed that assurance onto the police on the 3 occasions I’ve been stopped and asked to explain the noise..... Power steering also failed and had to be replaced - after pointing out to the customer services that I thought this was a very serious issue as car had been almost impossible to steer and I had only just left the motorway, I advised that it wouldn’t have been as much of a problem if it had failed on the motorway because it would have been easier to steer at speed... unbelievable! When it’s working and the sun is out, the car is great, but I have no confidence that it’s safe or robust and Renault Customer services are appalling - would never buy a Renault again.
Submitted: 2008-06-13 | ID: 1555 | 2/10
![]()
I too have a leaking roof. The car has been in over 10 times and still it leaks at the joint at the top of the side windows, yes both sides. The rear view vision is not very good either. Has anyone had a leaking roof successfully repaired?
Responses to this review
Hi, my 55 plate Megane has been in 3 times for water leaks now. The first time when I bought the car at 18 months old, they said they could not find any leaks and gave it back to me. It was still leaking so phoned them again and they said they were aware of a problem with them leaking on the roof, so they had it in and repaired it. I had it back but it was still leaking, phoned them again and they said "are you parking your car on an hill and you are washing your car to much"!! I phoned customer service and complained as this should have been sorted when it was in warranty so thay talked to Renault Cardiff and agreed to get it sorted for us. I booked it in and they said the roof was not leaking. Listen to this... under the plastic covering of the windscreen wiper motor at the bottom of the windscreen there is a trough with two holes either side which all the water runs into, down through a pipe, onto the floor underneath. Well, debris had got into the holes, blocking them and filling the trough up with water which was then going in through the inlet of the air con/heater and into the car - which has about 1-2 inches of water standing on the floor. If you push your hand down hard on the floor behind the seats water rises though the carpet. The problem now is I reckon this has been the problem all along and they have missed it on the two occasions it was booked in. The electrics are sitting on the floor, have been contaminated and need replacing with the foam carpets etc at a total cost of wait for it £3300. So all you Megane owners get under that cover and make sure them holes are not getting blocked up!! Terry Jones from Rhondda Cynon Taff
Hi, just to add I bought my Megane Coupe last May 2009, very nice looking car but I too have the problem with water leaking in on both sides where the seals meet. Please could you advise what the problem is or any suggestions of what to try and cure the problem? - Debbie Lawless from Lancashire
Submitted: 2008-06-05 | ID: 1534 | 2/10
![]()
In response to the email from Pam Darlison. If you have not sorted out your check injection light - I can help. I had the same problem with my Scenic a couple of weeks ago. My local garage plugged it in to the computer and couldn’t find anything wrong with it. I went home, trawled through the internet for half and hour and found the answer. You need to get the heater plugs changed and hey presto its sorted. It cost me £70 at my local garage. Hope this helps you and anyone else out there!
Submitted: 2008-06-03 | ID: 1522 | 4/10
![]()
Hi, it’s me again, just thought I would give you an update on the state of play. Well, the experts from Renault UK came up to visit us country yokels on Tuesday the 20th of May to spread their wealth of knowledge on water ingress or better known to us yokels as leaking roof. Well they tell me the problem has been completely resolved !!!???, so I am now praying for rain , sorry about this inconvenience, but is all for the advancement of science and to see if them clever buggers from down south know what they’re about. Anyway I mentioned about giving Graham his passport back and bugger me, he clears off to Moscow as soon as I turn my back. Well there are compensations at least the the two Ravishing beauties Jayne and Nicola didn’t desert me, and they have assured me a place on the top table at the Christmas party, no chairs just a table. Well I am preying to the god of rain and will keep you all informed. PS I hope Graham brought me a stick of rock back?? Best wishes playmates. Ray.
Submitted: 2008-05-27 | ID: 1488 | 1/10
![]()
Van is only 2 weeks old. A new master cylinder & slave cylinder are needed. The van has been off the road for a week so far as they don’t have a slave cylinder in stock. I’m very disappointed as this is my third Trafic van & its not off to a great start. By the way there are only 2k on the clock.
Responses to this review
Beware, tell them it is unfit for purpose. I have had 4 slave cylinders, clutch go up to 120,000. I have just had it back at 126,000. It has gone again now I am hacked off. There is a major problem, it is nice to have someone in my boat. Contact me and tell them you have someone who has had or is going to have 5 slave cylinders. It will not stop at that. Also has your van had a modification done to stop rain water corroding your fuel injectors? If not, get them to do it. Beware, my van was off the road 12 weeks since 58 oct - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2008-05-19 | ID: 1476 | 2/10
![]()
This car is amazing , I have just bought a 2005 Clio 1.4 16v and I am most impressed with its overall performance. The number one priority these days is economy, this is reaching a comfortably achievable 43.0 mpg and lower 34.0 mpg on shorter journeys. This car has a lot of sporty feel to it when you want it to perform open up the throttle and it soon accelerates smoothly and effortlessly when you need it to . It’s sumptuous hugging seats are superb holding you in when cornering hard or just running around giving you a comfortable ride and great feel on the road through the steering which is powered steering, but not overly powered giving a sure feel to the road with excellent grip via its wide tyres and sure-footed handling sports suspension , this is truly a mid range performer with economy to match, power delivery is of the highest in it’s class and will hold its own against other competitors in this range of the small sports hatch car market so overall its a perfect combination and the fun factor is excellent. I would certainly recommend this car !
Submitted: 2008-05-19 | ID: 1475 | 5/10
![]()
Since my last report it has had another electrical fault which stopped it in its tracks, discs and pads, and clutch replaced and now two weeks ago it dropped out of 6th gear on the motorway a couple of times and has now had a brand new gearbox fitted! Total bill for repairs since the warranty ran out is about 15k! Thank God I am not the lease company...
Submitted: 2008-05-16 | ID: 1469 | 1/10
![]()
Oh dear, Oh dear. If it wasn’t for the fact that a large chunk of plastic and metal flew off the parcel shelf corner as I was raising the roof last week and hit me in the back, I wouldn’t have much to complain about the car. The only leaks I’ve had are a few drips if it’s been sitting in a torrential downpour, or when the driers are set to cyclone on the car wash. However, I do have a serious problem with Renault aftercare. The local dealer service department are trying to argue that the said piece of plastic breaking off may be driver error?!? Hmmm, park on level surface, sit in drivers seat, push button. Not exactly difficult. Clearly the motor that folds the corner in to let the roof pass through failed. "It might be that you tried to lift the roof by hand" !!! Do they have any idea how heavy those bits of glass are? And why would I try that, when I can be perfectly lazy, sat on my rear, pushing a button? "Were you outside the car when this happened?" Yes, my name is Mr Tickle and I have nine foot arms. All I seem to get is apathy and ridiculous questions to get out of the fact their car failed. On the plus side, it’s a lease car which they get back in 12 months. If they still argue that I should pay for the repair, then guess what, I won’t pay for the repair, they’ll get it back in 12 months and have to repair it anyway, that on top of the fact I may get a solicitor involved for being hit by a 2lb piece of car. Oh, and I won’t be getting another Renault next time. :-)
Submitted: 2008-05-14 | ID: 1459 | 3/10
![]()
This is the best MPV, I did a lot of research before parting with my hard-earned money and it was all worth it. The space is very impressive and it can seat 5 adults and still be comfortable. Luggage and storage options cannot be faulted. I have never really been impressed by Renault or by French cars in general but the Scenic has, without doubt, changed my opinion somewhat. There is a feeling of quality that surrounds both the interior and the exterior, the optional parking sensors are recommended as they make parking on supermarket bays a doddle. Then we have the safety aspect, possible the most important factor in my opinion - front, side and full-length window airbags come as standard and the Scenic received the full 4 star EuroNCAP rating. This was the deal clincher. I have now done 10,000 trouble free miles safe in the knowledge that myself and my family are a safe as is possible. Good fuel economy and reasonable insurance costs plus a competitive purchase price make this a no-brainer when choosing a multi person vehicle. The 1.9 litre diesel gives great performance and the Scenic grips the road well. THE best MPV.
Submitted: 2008-05-08 | ID: 1431 | 5/10
![]()
... Hi, it’s me again with an update on my leaking roof, it has now been in six times and the technical department have been up from London to give us their wealth of experience. Well, poor Graham (Mechanic) from DSG Whitelund, Morecambe started off at fifteen stone and is now down too ten stone (he is accepting membership for his slimming club) all you need to join is a leaky cabriolet, poor bloke!! I have promised to give him back is passport in time for his hols, by god he needs one after my car. Well enough hilarity , my vehicle is still leaking at the opposite side now despite them changing all the rubber seals and hours of adjustments and now it has to go back in to DSG on the 20th of this month and this time are sending two technicians up from London working on the theory that two heads are better than one!!?? and then it will have to be re-booked in again for further repairs that will make 8 visits. The only good thing is I have been invited to the Christmas party by Jayne and Nicola who I am now officially recommending for receptionists of the year!! By the way Jayne you would still get wet in the back of the car!! Anyway, I have just been out and bought a 320di M BMW just in case they aren’t successful and before my wife divorces me!! Well, will keep you informed of progress or my senility whichever comes first. Best wishes, Ray.
Submitted: 2008-05-07 | ID: 1423 | 1/10
![]()
Fantastic car, very economical & lots of character. Bought it for my wife but cant resist taking it for a spin at every opportunity. LOVE IT !
Submitted: 2008-05-02 | ID: 1401 | 5/10
![]()
This is a good choice when looking for your first car. The fuel economy is good (45+ MPG) and very cheap to insure. It looks great too and handles really nicely and is comfortable for both the driver and the passengers. This is very good value for money.
Submitted: 2008-04-28 | ID: 1364 | 4/10
![]()
Just bought the missus an 04 plate 1.6 petrol cc,. Firstly, thanks to Jon Stevens, whose previous report was invaluable as I had the same problem with mine, with his report I knew how to fix it. The vehicle is running " lumpy" and takes a couple of attempts of button pushing to get it to "fire up", also the tick over is up and down... Luckily its still under warranty... Someone has mentioned it may be the coil pack , has anyone else had this problem and could they suggest a possible cure? Apart from that though the missus loves the motor and I must admit I love the look of the car.
Responses to this review
I have had 2 coils replaced on mine already. The RAC have told me this is quite common with the Renaults. They cost about £30 and if you are with the RAC they don’t charge you to fit it - Tamryn from Surrey
Yes, we just had same problem, it was diagnosed as the phase pulley. Approximately £550 to replace - Dave Pryer from Kent
Submitted: 2008-04-28 | ID: 1358 | 4/10
![]()
This is a great little car, well thought out in design and performs really well. Very cheap to run and low CO2 emissions mean it’s an affordable option. The engie performs well but can get a bit noisy on the motorway but still copes well enough for what I need it to do.
Submitted: 2008-04-24 | ID: 1339 | 4/10
![]()
Great family car, bags of space and comes with a good level of kit Ours has taken us to France and back twice and in the 2 years we’ve owned it has given us nothing but trouble free driving. Very reasonable to run and very good safety features. Can’t fault it.
Submitted: 2008-04-24 | ID: 1334 | 5/10
![]()
Brilliantly flexible car that I just love to drive. Extremely spacious for it’s size - I have two teenage boys, both over six foot and they find sitting in the back very comfortable. Very cheap to run and quite stylish.
Submitted: 2008-04-20 | ID: 1287 | 5/10
![]()
Think twice before buying 1 of these cars. had mine for 16 months now. Currently in the garage for the 5th time for water leakage. Got a call from them yesterday to tell me that whilst the tech expert was re sealing my car he shut the door and guess what - THE ROOF IMPLODED.
Submitted: 2008-04-18 | ID: 1284 | 1/10
![]()
This is the third MkIV Espace dci I have owned, the Renault dealers are all poor ( don’t give one if you want to buy one, give even less once it is bought) the car is good, although it is heavy on front tyres. make sure when you buy one it has Michelin’s fitted. My previous two had Continentals which only lasted 11,000 miles. The extra two seats which I keep out of the car most of the time are heavy, and a pain in the arse to store, although safe integral seatbelts, individual movements etc. The car comes in to it’s own on long journeys though, fantastic on long French autoroutes packed up with all the kids and luggage, beats Ryanair every time! We wish BMW did a seven seater, the dealers, the product, and the customer care cant be beaten! take not Renault!
Submitted: 2008-04-14 | ID: 1276 | 4/10
![]()
We’ve just bought this used Kangoo and are absolutely thrilled with it. It’s very easy to drive and is like a tardis when it comes to space. Perfect for a family of 4 with dogs, bikes, buggy etc.
Submitted: 2008-04-14 | ID: 1269 | 4/10
![]()
I have driven this van from new and everything was great until about two years in (just when the warranty expired). The first thing to go was the crank shaft sensor. The next thing, around 95k was the clutch slave cylinder, which I gather from all comments I have been able to find online is a common problem with this and all vans with the same body type (Nissan and Vauxhall). It is not a small job with these vans to fix it either. All that taken into account I would definitely buy a Trafic again, the only change I would make is to get a tail lift door instead. It is great to drive and on long journeys it is not as tiring as a car is. If only Renault would get it together with their customer services for issues that are clearly design flaws, hence the 4 stars instead of 5.
Submitted: 2008-04-11 | ID: 1265 | 4/10
![]()
Must say I’m really glad I bought my car before reading the tails of woe this forum contains! I’m very pleased that, so far, mine is almost perfect. Before I bought I tried all the competition (Peugeot, Vauxhall, Volvo, Saab etc) available & decided that it was the best of the bunch for me. I also know of two people locally who are now on their second car & have been very happy with both of them. My heart goes out to those who’ve not had such a good experience. Only had it for two months (since Feb 08) & 3000 miles but it has stood out in rain, hail, sleet & snow as well as glorious sunshine (albeit a bit chilly). I’m pleased to report that not a drop of water has managed to get into the cabin. The roof has been up & down quite a bit already. The heater works well to keep the front seat occupants warm on frosty mornings with the top down but it can get a bit chilly in the back. I do find the heated front seats a bit strange as the centre gets hot but the side supports stay cold which is slightly uncomfortable. Contrary to popular myth it is big enough for 4 adults as long as they are no all over 6ft like me. Rule of thumb, I have found, is that the front & back seat passenger on the same side should not really have a combined height of more than about 11ft 8in for comfort. I find the back seat with two over 6 footers in is still quite comfy (with shorter people in the front) & there is more head room in the back than my Vectra hatch! You can also get in & out of the back seat while the driver is still sitting & the roof up. Our 130 dci auto gives good if not spectacular acceleration & currently about 38mpg in mixed use. I’ve seen figures in the 50s on the computer traveling on the motorway at a steady speed (70) & good A roads but tends to get knocked down again by the slow crawl in traffic, which is to be expected I suppose. Handling, brakes etc are good bearing in mind the torsional stiffness of the roof is missing & it does tend to rattle a bit but not unduly for this type of car. Definitely more of a cruiser than a sports car; but hey, who wants to go fast with the top down anyway? BEWARE. The auto diesel model service interval is only 9000 miles & not the 12000 as per the manual & 18000 for the petrol models. Ok if you want to leave it on the drive but a pain if you want to drive it a lot (which you will). The way we are going it will need servicing every 6 months!
Submitted: 2008-04-08 | ID: 1255 | 4/10
![]()
I love the car Dynamique dCi 130 6 Speed, economical, however I do have a water leak that appears to be coming in from the wing mirror, the Renault service department told me to park uphill as they could not find where the water was coming in??? Also, when I start the engine the message says check injection with the service light on, car is not due for a service for another 11k miles. Has anyone else had the injection message showing as Renault says they cannot find a fault?
Responses to this review
I have the same, but found if you stop the engine after a short run and start again it warning goes out - Keith Powell from Lancashire
Submitted: 2008-04-07 | ID: 1252 | 5/10
![]()
I was unable to start the car with the button and the clutch depressed, only with the brake depressed. I trawled down to the dealer and they were unable to spot it, so I asked how much for them to keep it and they sort it out - £35 an hour and a days work. I trawled through the net and found an article with exactly the same fault but no answer on how to fix it. Just in case anybody else has this problem, look under the clutch pedal and there is a plug attached by wires that leads to the ignition circuit, inspect them carefully where they come out from the plug, I found that although mine appeared intact, one side was not, so you squeeze the sides of the plug and it comes out and bit from the wiring. Plugged it back in no problems since.
Submitted: 2008-04-04 | ID: 1244 | 4/10
![]()
Very juicy on petrol; only getting 21 miles per gallon.
Submitted: 2008-04-03 | ID: 1239 | 1/10
![]()
Had car for 2yrs now love it no problems at all. maybe its because it was built for cyprus not uk. Also got full size spare wheel. Only wish it had leather when new, seats a pain to keep clean so recovered them now.
Submitted: 2008-03-29 | ID: 1221 | 5/10
![]()
I bought the dci 106 dynamique c/c and I can honestly say I’ve never driven a better car. The miles per gallon and drive are fantastic not to mention the build quality and the lack of wind noise. I feel sorry for the people who have given it a bad review although I suppose you only go onto a website like this if you have had problems !!!!
Submitted: 2008-03-28 | ID: 1218 | 5/10
![]()
Going to start good to bad, This van is stylish value for money quick and ace to drive. Like they say it drives as a car would , Big fuel tank for those long miles. Miles let me just say the traffic does not like them, At 40k a new turbo was needed, At 60k 2 new track rod ends now at just 70k the clutch is slipping only 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th, 1st 2nd are ok . I think that R gear is to hi putting a lot of strain on the clutch. Engine at the moment would seem to be sound. The van has been over serviced but it works hard for it ........... After all that, there is only one thing left to comment on. NO RUST well done Renault. Note to all, try putting a set of 17" wheels and low pro tyres on as it goes round a corner like stink.
Submitted: 2008-03-25 | ID: 1190 | 4/10
![]()
Got a top spec 2004 Grande Scenic on a lease which whilst the most practical, economical, child friendly and comfy car I have ever had has today broken down for the sixth time in a year. Since the warranty ran out last May the lease company (thank god I took the maintenance package out!!!) have spent �8,600 on repairs. These have been to date Oil pump and turbo (�2,000), complete engine 3 months later due to oil starvation (�5,000), discs, pads, batttery and clutch (�1,600) and today its died again. Its done 80,000 easy motorway cruising miles and hasn’t been thrashed or abused. I am on first name terms with the Renault garage staff and most of the AA in Kent! How can Renault produce cars like this?
Responses to this review
Many of the correspondents are commenting on cars which are fairly old, i.e. 2001/3/4, and often have covered many miles. Surely it is a fact that well worn mass produced cars break, and the scenic was somewhat infamous for this in its earlier incarnations? Can we have any comments on 2009/2010 models? - Duncan Morrison from England
Submitted: 2008-03-25 | ID: 1183 | 1/10
![]()
I collected my new cabriolet on Dec 18 2007 I went for the top of the range 1.9 diesel leather upholstery etc This is my second cabriolet I had one of the first ones in 2004, had very few problems but this one has been back to the dealer DSG of Morecambe 4 times with a leaking roof and they are still unable to rectify the problem Renault have even produced a DVD to assist, but to no avail, so know I have to wait for Renault technical dept to get involved. Will keep you posted. Ray
Submitted: 2008-03-25 | ID: 1177 | 2/10
![]()
I’ve have had the car now for 6 months and never had any problem with the car whatsoever. Really impressed with the acceleration and handling even though it’s the first diesel I’ve owned and I can’t even remember the last time I had to fill the thing up, very economical considering the stop-start driving I do every day. Fun car to drive, looks good with the roof up or down, comfortable and when the roof is up the boot space is enormous. The only thing i wished i had gone for was the 1.9 dci (130) model.
Responses to this review
The tyre pressure should be on a plate on the recess of the driver door - Mark Brennan from Kent
Submitted: 2008-03-17 | ID: 1155 | 4/10
![]()
Bought the car just over a year ago from a local Renault specialist dealer. The car was 2 years old and had only done 2500 miles and it has now been in the garage 14 times with lots of faults, the main one being the engine and service light which they CAN’T seem to cure. At 18000 miles its just had a new cat and yes its still not right, been back twice now with yes the same problem!! Has anyone any ideas because it is now getting beyond a joke?
Submitted: 2008-03-17 | ID: 1150 | 2/10
![]()
We have a Renault Kangoo under the Motability scheme, it is a 1.6 automatic with a drop floor to allow wheelchair access from a company called "Constables" and the conversion and the car is excellent for its use as a wheelchair carrying vehicle. Very good on petrol and is reliable in every aspect of motoring, well done Constables and Renault. Power steering and air con are both very good along with the open vision from the driving point of view, have not found any blind spots at the moment so this car for my use is a terrific little car, the wife Brenda also likes the car and has no problem or regrets in getting it.
Submitted: 2008-03-17 | ID: 1149 | 4/10
![]()
This is my 3rd leased one and will probably be replaced with another in 3 months when it goes back. The rainwater effect Michaela mentioned has been there since 2003, so they’ve not even attempted to address the problem through the years. But it is a practical car - good headroom in the back even for 6 footers. The automatic windscreen wipers Jenny complained about can have their sensitivity adjusted by the rotary wheel on the wiper stalk - and yes you can manually turn them off too, so it really shouldn’t be a gripe. The DCi 86 1.5 is only £35 a year to tax thanks to the low CO2 emissions, or at least until the Chancellor changes it. The car also turns in a healthy 47.5mpg average in real life without trying. Since I’ve not reset the read-out throughout the 10K miles this one’s now done that is a real use figure as opposed to the Government/Manufacturer figures. It rolled over and started again at 10K miles, but has settled back to that again in the 4.5K I’ve done since. Handling is a little soft, but it does grip well and despite the brake squeal (which I do have, but is minor), the car has phenominal stopping ability - in common with all other Renaults I’ve driven. The softness does however make for a comfortable drive on rougher surfaces, so a reasonable compromise that works well on the deteriorating UK roads. I’d agree with Ray about it being a practical although not exciting car, but all the ones I’ve had have all been reliable, economical and nothing has fallen off. Insurance is cheap too. Build quality is OK, nowhere near as precise as on a German car, but then they have far more toys as standard. Boot space is bigger than you might expect when you look at the car and like the Scenic it has several handy storage spaces including 2 underfloor ones in the front foot wells. Air-con is standard and the Maxim variant has an MP3 player which makes a CD go a lot further when you make your own. I’ve not gone beyond 20K miles in the ones I’ve had, so the Turbo failure Alison has had at 53K miles is outside my experience. However I do know 2 other Megane drivers who’ve exceeded that mileage with no issues, but who have said that the car does start to deteriorate at about 5 years old / 80K miles - electric windows being a common failure it seems. The car flags when it approaches service intervals - messages turn up in the computer display along with a spanner icon. Annoying when this starts at about 46 weeks for your 1 years service, but it does at least mean you’ve got no excuse to say you forgot. Having driven a 1.9 DCi Sport I was surprised just how much more power it had. The car was amazingly tractable and felt much faster than I’d expected it would in relation to the 1.5. The sport also felt like it had taughter handling, but at the expense of 1.5 hatch comfort on bumpier surfaces. So in summary, if you’ve not tried one you’ll probably be surprised how practical they are. They wont excite you but if you want reliable transport with low running costs you could do much worse.
Submitted: 2008-03-14 | ID: 1130 | 4/10
![]()
We bought the top of the range diesel scenic and love it. Although we have only done 48000 miles which is silly for a six year old diesel we would be looking to buy a new one, however we just don’t like the new shape, shame. It is constantly reliable and roomy, easily big enough for five even on a long journey. The seats come out if you need more boot space no problem, mpg is good and overall we can’t fault it.
Submitted: 2008-02-28 | ID: 1087 | 5/10
![]()
I've only had the car 3 weeks and it's been back to Renault for 2 of them! After picking up the car i noticed oil on the floor, so i took it into the garage, to find the "wishbones" had gone, and the seal on the oil filter was "leaking". I'm supposed to be picking it up tomorrow, my advice after reading everybody else's comments would be stay well away from this car.
Submitted: 2008-02-26 | ID: 1077 | 1/10
![]()
I purchased this car in November 2007, after a few weeks I complained that the roof was leaking slightly. The garage I purchased it from, took it in, and after a week said it was fixed. They had adjusted the door. Next time it rained the passenger seat was sodden! The garage had it back, kept it for a month (while it waited for parts) and then said it was fixed. They had replaced all the door seals, and the rear windows (which apparently came as part of the door seal package). It does not leak any more, but the doors do not fit well either!! My only other complaint about the car is that it has no ’go’ and is very slow to get going. Otherwise I love it!!
Submitted: 2008-02-25 | ID: 1071 | 4/10
![]()
I have owned Laguna€™s since 1994 and they represent excellent value - depreciation is high so being prepared to keep for a good few years. The 2005 version (just replaced by 2007 version) is an excellent all round car which gives space, reliability and practicality.
Submitted: 2008-02-21 | ID: 1054 | 4/10
![]()
Purchased Sept 06, after 1000 miles had squeaky brakes, to which still to this day Renault can not find a repair to. I have been advised it€™s since the new shape and still on-going fault finding. My car has been in several times to have the brakes cleaned. If feels like i am driving a 25 year old car! The wipers come on, on there own - even on a very sunny day. The lights on the dash board have had to be repaired as they failed twice. Now I have no radio, the clock back light on permanently and the mpg/mph clock going up and down erratically. I am still outstanding a response from Renault which I sent yesterday to put an end to the on-going problems. Fingers crossed!
Submitted: 2008-02-19 | ID: 1050 | 1/10
![]()
I think the car looks great with the roof up or down. It goes extremely well 130 bhp engines are very smooth and in fact I would say it is quieter than my own car which is a 320d. Was very impressed with the roof mechanism; very slick. However from the early stages of ownership it started to leak just a drip or two nothing two serious, thought it was perhaps normal but then the problem got worse. It was in and out of the dealership a few times but no improvement at all, decided to take it to another dealership thinking perhaps it was down to the quality of the mechanics. That dealership kept if for a week and handed the car back and basically said they were unable to fix it (Car has 6 month warranty left). Its in the hands of Renault UK to sort out, they tell me they are going to send an expert over to assess and fix the roof, but it would appear that from other reviews people across the UK are experiencing similar problems so I am not hopeful. It is a real shame my wife loves the car and so do I. Not sure where to go from here. The car is two and half years old now I cant see Renault giving us our money back.
Submitted: 2008-02-18 | ID: 1047 | 2/10
![]()
I purchased this car last August with my partner- (Renault Ilford). He told me endless times not to go for a Renault especially a coupe cab - but this is the car I wanted and I did not listen!!! The car to me is very attractive but that is all what is going for it. I had endless problems - the handbrake needed to be replaced - and also the clutch (thank god I had warranty)!! Then it decided to completely cut out (4 times) when I was pulling out of a junction or roundabout (which nearly involved me and my baby in TWO accidents). After endless returns to Renault Ilford I had had enough!!!!! I then had to involve solicitors as I was not excepting anymore bulls*it from them. (I was literally ready to drive the car through their showroom). I got a complete refund and also out of pocket expenses. I would say never ever purchase one of these cars, unless you’re willing to put up with the endless problems which occur with these vehicles! I thought that this may have been a one off but looking and hearing reviews (bad ones) of these cars it just shows there are many more people like me who have parted with there well eared cash on a car they thought would be the best thing ever but turned out to be the worst and most of all the most time consuming mistake ever!!!!!!! Please be warned.
Submitted: 2008-02-18 | ID: 1040 | 1/10
![]()
Fantastic value - Big name brand, electric windows, central locking, remote control stereo on steering wheel, metallic paint , drives like a dream, drinks hardly any petrol, costs nothing to insure and still has the cool factor as its a Clio !!! VA VA Vooooom :-) Bargain - get one now.
Submitted: 2008-02-11 | ID: 1021 | 5/10
![]()
I love Renaults, i really do, this is my second one and i will replace it with another, it may not look that spectacular but it provides all i need, it has 3 proper seat belts in the back and it feels safe and secure. It drives comfortable, it’s not a gas guzzler and not too bad for the environment. With petrol costs spiralling out of control it’s economical too. Boot space is good; it can handle a trip to Tesco and the huge amounts of groceries a family of 5 consume. I would highly recommend Renaults to everyone. Happy driving.
Submitted: 2008-02-11 | ID: 1012 | 4/10
![]()
Loved the shape of the car and looks very nice from the inside. Only thing is since i bought the car a year and half ago we have had nothing but engine problems with it and now only after 53000 miles the turbo has blown in the car and you don’t expect something like that to happen on a new car and now it will cost 1800 just to repair the car which I find very expensive.
Submitted: 2008-02-06 | ID: 1005 | 3/10
![]()
wonderful vehicles, use em for work a lot diesel is fantastic and with the sat nav and moon roof we use em as limos in paris for tv and photo shoots that good, i’m thinking of buying one!
Submitted: 2008-02-04 | ID: 992 | 4/10
![]()
I have had this car for 18 months now and as much as I want to love it I find nothing but problem after problem. Past problems: Firstly the car was creaky after investigation the garage said the bolts needed tightening inside the frame of the car. Also the air conditioning had to be replaced because of a rattling noise. Ongoing problems with no fix: The suspension creaks (they did replace the rear suspension but problem still there). The brakes squeak (they told me there was nothing they could do as my car already had the "fix". The parcel shelf rattles. Current problems: The roof leaks which they have had in the garage but have not fully fixed. The inside of the roof frame seems to be collecting water and sloshes about when you drive (they tried to tell me it was the fuel tank i could hear) the drivers heated seat is faulty (they are fixing this weekend, hopefully!!) I wish I never bought the car and am now stuck with a car that cost me a lot of money and is not worth anything.
Submitted: 2008-02-01 | ID: 988 | 1/10
![]()
Good car, just a pity about some of the components that they used to make it with. I.e. the exhaust and electric window motors seem to fail after a few years. Other than that a good little car.
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 980 | 4/10
![]()
I have had my Renault Scenic for 4 years now and I love everything about it. It is spacious, it is high up with clear all round views, it is comfortable and easily seats 5 adults. I have never had any problems with it and I am 100% sure that my next car will also be a Renault Scenic. It even has little picnic tables for the rear passengers and the seats fold up to make a really spacious luggage/parcel storage department. I would recommend this car to anyone who wants to have stress free motoring.
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 976 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve been driving my Modus for nearly 2 years and its great - smooth handling, good MPG, loads of headroom and has a nifty double-opening boot! Great!
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 973 | 5/10
![]()
This is the Third Scenic to date and possible the best in both comfort and economy, the previous two one was a 1.9 dt and the last one a 1.6 16v ,although both had there good points this series 2 ,has now made a very good motor even better, economy and speed, masses of pull with the small 106 engine and around fifty five to the gallon, only one fault is the design of the tailgate if you open this in the rain prepare for a wet boot, so beware, also the roof line being narrower than the doors also tends to let the rain into the door switches and the front foot wells, apart from these small problems a very good all round vehicle.
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 962 | 5/10
![]()
Interested to hear about the imploding roof, the same thing happened to mine last year cost me - they said it wasn’t a fault with the car!!! The roof leaks at the driver side, has always been a problem. The more I think about it small things like the alarm saying on all night, windows dropping down, and engine trouble - RAC saying it’s a Renault!! I will definitely be buying a different make.
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 961 | 1/10
![]()
Fancy a life of never ending electrical faults, endless trips to Evans Hernshaw (Yes, If you’ve been there you know what I mean) Do not buy any Renault you have been warned.
Submitted: 2008-01-28 | ID: 960 | 1/10
![]()
I own a 55 reg with the 17" alloys and split tail gate. Having done 12,000 miles (it’s the wife car!) it has been very very good. Only one weird problem.... the door leaks water and it collects in the storage holder at the bottom. This same problem happens on my friends Megane. Very comfortable and an impressive list of standard features. More than a BMW! I can recommend this car without any hesitation. 5 out of 5!
Responses to this review
Nick, I have the very same problem with water collecting in the passanger door and I’m buggered if I can find the fault!! Did you have any joy?? I don’t want to go back to the dealer as I’m sure it cost me £100 for no reason! - Kevin Duggan from Herefordshire
Submitted: 2008-01-16 | ID: 930 | 5/10
![]()
We have five vans ( Traffic) of different ages from 05 up to 57 ,we now have two in the garage one with 96k and one with 112k that require new engine’s , as this happed to anybody else. The two in question are on three year lease which expires in May 08 Renault have refused to help with the cost of the repair due to high mileage, is it high mileage for working vans ?
Submitted: 2008-01-15 | ID: 928 | 1/10
![]()
The Renault Megane coupe - cabriolet is a bad car don’t buy one . The roofs leak .and they don’t start so good . A push now and then helps. Well done Renault and thank you for this crap car . I feel so sick after all the money I’ve spent on this car . Should have not got rid of my Nissan. Well we all live and learn. So if any one is thinking of buying a Renault . On your own head be it . One more thing to add, Renault UK, your cars are shit !!!
Submitted: 2008-01-14 | ID: 925 | 1/10
![]()
This is a proper grandparent�s car, with grandparent�s driver position, grandparents, style, grandparent�s smells, grandparents, driving appeal, grandparents everything really. Used one borrowed from my grandparents and was able to fully understand why so many grandparents buy this particular Renault. There is nothing wrong with the Megane, (sometimes there is lost of things wrong with grandparents), but we have to be realistic about car passion and appeal from some of us cooler type of drivers. As a family transport wagon they are absolutely fine, and the versatility of the model, the fuel consumption, the rear split folding seats, the stupid bloody playing card of an engine start up gadget, the pretty modern shape, (apart from that awful rear arse shape that has been drummed into us from those annoying adverts in recent years)! There is a couple of simple word for describing this model.......Simply o.k...
Responses to this review
And now you are a grandparent? :) - Penelope Lane from New Zealand
Submitted: 2008-01-14 | ID: 917 | 3/10
![]()
My Renault Megane cabriolet is 12 weeks old. Paid cash for it at Charles Hurst Boucher road Belfast anyone that is thinking of buying any Renault please please think again. The roof started leaking. Windows work when they want to. Some mornings it will be very hard to start. And the list goes on and on .and when you bring it back to Charles Hurst. The service staff will give you the run around. And blow smoke up your back side to get you out off there show room. At the end of the day when you pay for your lovely new car. Its f**k you mac we got paid. Ha ha. well Charles Hurst this is only the start of it cant wait until trading standards get there teeth in to your’s and the Sunday world.
Submitted: 2008-01-09 | ID: 905 | 1/10
![]()
Owned the car for 16 months now; sparkling performance from a little engine with a surprising turn of torque for 1460 cc. Economy is good too; I never believe manufacturers mpg figures because I don’t drive like their testers - I live in a real world where town driving has a real time effect on economy. This serves to focus on the economy of 48 mpg around town that I’ve experienced. A good load carrier - buy the roof bars for £70 for a real carry car. A shame that at six feet tall the back seats won’t fold down flat when I’m driving, but the split rear seats are good. Comfort, cosseted by leather panels, is reasonably good with loads of adjustment and the adjustable steering wheel really does work to find a good driving position. Steering is not overly light as some have claimed, but I know what they mean when they say there’s little feel, it’s true but so what. Six-speed box is very light to operate and gives quiet motorway cruising ability with a genuine tank measured 59 mpg on motorway work over 400 miles. Not many cars can achieve that! When we ordered the car, I was prepared to pay the additional pounds for the 17 inch alloys, but the salesman advised against them. Having driven the same car with the 17 inchers, how right he was because the wheel comes as standard with a lower profile tyre which may fill the wheel arch in a visually attractive way but you lose out on the comfort and road noise aspect. Headlights - main beam needs more power/longer throw but that may be me at 59 years old. Climate control is excellent; all cars will have this eventually, but this is the first that I’ve had which actually works when your tie’s done up in a summer traffic jam. We ordered a dark grey one with cream (no other colour available!) fully expecting to be frequently busy with the cleaning chemicals but I’m amazed to find that it’s survived without a single wipe over during our tenure. Build quality is good as are the materials; having been a VW buyer for 30 years, I was prepared to be disappointed and critical but I am genuinely pleased as no rattles have papered and no part has fallen or vibrated off, and I don’t expect it to.
Submitted: 2008-01-02 | ID: 879 | 4/10
![]()
Have had a clutch problem on Trafic van since 36,000 kms (21,000miles). Full clutch kit and slave cylinder changed as i couldn’t select gear because pedal would not travel full distance up. 15000 kms (9000 miles) later, i’m getting clutch slippage in 3rd to 6th gears but not 1st and 2nd gears. Renault Australia are dragging their feet. This is my business as i do carpet & tile/grout cleaning. The dealers themselves have been very helpful, but Renault head office are looking for a way out i feel. Apart from this problem, i love the van, it looks great and is so economical. If they fix this problem i don’t know whether to keep van or not, because if it happens again i just can’t afford to have it off the road again. Renault needs to work on customer service, not just future design, otherwise people will steer away from their products.
Responses to this review
Seriously, tell them it is unfit for purpose. Get your money back now. I have experienced a bad one, get out now - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2007-12-18 | ID: 863 | 2/10
![]()
IMPLODING ROOF Michelle See my review in October with exactly the same fault. Renault, after much complaint, met the full costs. I got rid of the car soon afterwards and wrote to TOP GEAR. No repsonse yet....
Submitted: 2007-12-17 | ID: 860 | 1/10
![]()
Renault Megane Coupe-Cabriolet Dynamique 1.9DT If anyone else has had a problem with the roof imploding and completely shattering could you please let me know! I have a Megane Coupe-Cab year 2005 which I thought was a pretty good buy up until now!! Whilst on the motorway a couple of days ago and driving at speed I might add, I suddenly heard the loudest POP and BANG I have ever herd in my life. Once I finally raised my head from the what sounded like a gun shot or bomb, I looked up to raining shatterd glass trickiling down my hat and face. Absolutely nothing had hit the roof, it completely shattered in a million pieces. All you Megane Coupe-Cabriolet drivers please be aware of this and if anyone else has come across this please please please come forward as surprise surprise Renault are taking absolutely no responsibility whatsoever - Guess who will be picking up the tab on this one ??????
Submitted: 2007-12-10 | ID: 848 | 1/10
![]()
After having looked at a variety of different small cars we came back to the Clio, partly because we have run one successfully before and partly because nothing else came close to its overall appeal. The offer that our local dealer came up with at nearly 30% off made buying a second hand car seem ridiculous. The good bits are: Build quality, Space, Fun to drive, Excellent at motorway speeds. Very quiet. Reasonable spec. These cars are so discounted that they are less expensive than real cheapies and very small offerings from the likes of Kia and Chevy. We are thrilled with it. Renault have just carried out a facelift on the Campus and started producing the 5 door again in February. If you’re looking for a well built tried and trusted small car that will give years of service with a touch of French style then go for this!
Submitted: 2007-12-07 | ID: 828 | 5/10
![]()
I purchased this car in July & took delivery on 03/08 2007 after cancelling my order with Ford for a Focus CC3 placed in January which they kept delaying delivery on due to problems with being unable to stop the roofs leaking (which they still don’t appear to have sorted). This is the first diesel I have owned and it is surprisingly quite and responsive. The glass roof makes it really light and airy even when you can’t get the roof down due to the British weather, but even in the winter on a bright sunny day the heating system keeps it warm with the roof down. Plenty of room in the rear and in the boot even with the roof down. The only problem I have had has been an intermittant starting problem with the hands free card, when you press the brake or clutch and push the button to start nothing happens. The car has been back to Renault to try to find any fault but they have been unable to reproduce the fault, they have advised me not to keep using the same card but to alternate them to avoid draining the battery and if you place the card in the reader once a week it will charge the card, although there is no mention of this in the handbook. Can’t fault customer service though as they keep ringing to check on whether the problem is still there (unlike Ford’s couldn’t care less dept who just refused to discuss problems with leaking roofs and delivery).
Submitted: 2007-12-06 | ID: 818 | 4/10
![]()
I’m a courier and the Clio Van is a very good choice for what I need. The diesel engine is economic and the handling is excellent. I even have a radio cassette player! This is a very comfortable van with plenty of headroom and excellent for negotiating heavy traffic in cities and towns.
Submitted: 2007-11-30 | ID: 813 | 4/10
![]()
Excellent value for money, loads of extras as standard on this particular model. A very high quality car, built well and comfortable to drive. Spacious enough for a family of 5 but maybe not as much space as other estates? I think there’s ample though. Good car, definately better than average.
Submitted: 2007-11-26 | ID: 770 | 4/10
![]()
This van really stands out from the crowd thanks to some very stylish bodywork. Getting your company name noticed whilst on the road is not to be underated and this van certainly achieves that. The van itself is very easy and enjoyable to drive and comes with a good standard spec. Excellent value for money.
Responses to this review
LOL - Ashley Vass from Berkshire
Submitted: 2007-11-26 | ID: 761 | 5/10
![]()
I love my Modus! I have had it from new and it is quite simply the best car I have ever driven. You can park it easily, the fact that the seats can collapse/move is an added bonus, and you sit nice and high and get good visibility of the road. I also feel very safe in the car and it is so easy to drive. When my lease expires in April 2008, I shall probably end up getting another Modus. Well done Renault!
Submitted: 2007-11-26 | ID: 759 | 5/10
![]()
Nice car to drive on a daily basis. Very comfortable and easy to drive. Good space in front and back and nice sized boot. All in all a well thought out saloon that looks classy.
Submitted: 2007-11-22 | ID: 727 | 4/10
![]()
This car is extremely versatile, great for carrying the grandchildren to school. Very safe and robust.
Responses to this review
Don’t buy one of these skips unless you are an auto electrician. 4.5 years old: electronic dash replaced, headlamps failed, query BCM, and heater only works on 3, other than this the 1.6 is painfully hard to drive, vastly under powered and Renault aren’t interested once the vehicle is out of warranty. Extremely disappointed, worse car I have had the misfortune to own - Jim from England
Totally with Jim on this one. My engine wiring loom corroded beyond repair. I’m faced with a bill of ’at least £1400’ from a Renault dealer. Unacceptable for a car just under 6yrs old IMO - Alan from Kent
Submitted: 2007-11-20 | ID: 670 | 4/10
![]()
I’ve just bought the 1.5 diesel version of these and am incredibly pleased. Although a smaller engine than I normally go for it is quite responsive and surprisingly quick! The car is comfortable affordable to maintain and stylish and although not much leg room in the back I don’t think I would get a similar car for the price I paid. Its cheep to tax and the MPG is amazing!! The interior has lots of space in front and plenty of storage - the boot is huge when top up with top down it’s a lot smaller but does the job. I love the glass roof helps to make it feel more spacious and the sound system is good for a standard piece of kit - overall I would recommend one of these to anyone except if you have a large family!
Submitted: 2007-11-20 | ID: 648 | 5/10
![]()
Great drive with enough power and reasonable around corners. Very smooth acceleration. Excellent and comfy seats on rails which make moving back and forth to swap boot room for leg room easy. Panoramic sun roof superb option.
Submitted: 2007-11-16 | ID: 608 | 5/10
![]()
The Renault Kangoo is a good Muti-Purpose Car. It is very good at towing as you can not even feel yourself towing a trailer. The Kangoo just cruises along very smoothly along the roads and motorways. The car it self is very comfortable, you can fit 5 full adults in the car without feeling uncomfy, you have the luxury of air-con which cars down the Kangoo very quick in just under 2mins. The car also benifits tall people as it has a very large space for headroom. The driving position is perfect for any driver as it is high up above standard cars. You have got a huge plastic based boot for transporting big loads i.e. large dogs (enough room for our Airedale Terrier & Westie to lay flat out). In the back you have loads of leg room. The rear seats fold up to the front seats so you have doubled the boot space like a mini van, it has tie down d-rings in the boot floor, the boot floor is all plastic. The plastic floor has lots of benifits i.e. going to the dump, transporting dirty loads as it just wipes clean very easy. We have never had any problems with our Kangoo. We have nothing bad to say about it because it is perfect in every way.
Submitted: 2007-11-13 | ID: 568 | 5/10
![]()
I’ve had the car 18 months & never had any problem with the car whatsoever. Really impressed with the acceleration & handling even though it’s the first Diesel I’ve owned and I can’t even remember the last time I had to fill the thing up, very economical considering the stop-start driving I do every day. Fun car to drive, looks good with the roof up or down, comfortable and when the roof is up the boot space is enormous. The only downside is that you can’t get a spare wheel (not even a space saver) for this model, instead you’re supplied with 2 cans of inflating foam, great for a nail or slow puncture but no use when your wife damages the sidewall of the tyre ("honestly, I didn’t hit the kerb") & Renault Assistance (which is included as part of the warranty) won’t attend without charging the earth as it’s not a warranty related issue. Oh & the horn is like a toy car hoot, you might as well shout...
Submitted: 2007-11-07 | ID: 538 | 5/10
![]()
Good quality build and practical car. Cheap to run and insure for a saloon. Handling a little clumsy but otherwise a good buy.
Submitted: 2007-11-02 | ID: 488 | 3/10
![]()
My family was getting larger and my VW Golf just wasn’t big enough any more. I had heard many positive reports on the Laguna from friends and family and after reading some online reviews decided that it was the car for me. I feel that my choice has been vindicated as the Laguna is a fine drive an gives me all the space we need. WHAT CAR? gave the Laguna 4 stars out of 5. I’ll give it 5 out of 5, that’s how happy I am with it.
Submitted: 2007-11-02 | ID: 487 | 5/10
![]()
Bought the Scenic brand new a few months ago. Chuffed to bits with it, nippy, spacious, safe and good value for money. The Scenic is based on the Megane and is very economical, doing about 50 miles to the gallon. Both myself and my wife feel extremely safe in the Scenic, a full complement of air bags and anti-lock brakes. A EuroNCap rating of 5 stars confirms this feeling. If you are looking for a family car then you should look no further than the Renault Scenic,, it ticks all the boxes for us as a family.
Submitted: 2007-10-30 | ID: 446 | 5/10
![]()
For a 1.2 litre engine the Twingo is remarkably speedy and copes just as well on motorways as in cities. The fuel economy is excellent and with the low CO2 emissions running costs are kept low. The Twingo, in my opinion, is a perfect city car that can also cope outside of the city environment.
Submitted: 2007-10-30 | ID: 441 | 3/10
![]()
Nice compact car with very spacious interior. It’s extremely responsive and therefore very easy to drive although I am going to mark it down regarding visibility as the windscreen pillars are quite chunky. The other downside is the boot space which is a bit mean although you can slide the rear seats forward. Good car but nothing special.
Submitted: 2007-10-26 | ID: 387 | 3/10
![]()
I find my diesel Megane really cheap to run, insure & tax. On a 57 plate I only paid £11,000 for a nearly new one with just a few thousand miles. An important factor for me was the 5 star NCAP rating.
Submitted: 2007-10-25 | ID: 347 | 3/10
![]()
The Campus is a fun car to drive, has good road handling and gets you from A to B nice and reliably. It is very cost effective to run and insure and not too expensive to buy but I’m told that the depreciation on this car is going to be quite hefty, which has kind of taken the wind out of my sales about it.
Submitted: 2007-10-24 | ID: 341 | 3/10
![]()
I’ve been driving a Clio for nearly 3 months it’s been excellent. It’s a 1.2 extreme, there’s lots of space and the insurance is cheap. This is the car for people who are single or just passed their test!!
Submitted: 2007-10-19 | ID: 309 | 5/10
![]()
Two weeks after picking up my new Megane Cabriolet (which I thought was going to be the car of my dreams), the roof started leaking. After 8 visits to various dealers and 15 months of battling with Renault UK, they agreed to replace my car with another model from the range which I am more then happy with. Part of the problem was caused when I visited one dealer for them to try and repair the roof, only for them to cause more problems which is as long story but resulted in them respraying half of the car. Unfortunately the spray job was not brilliant as I had pearlescent paint and I ended up with a two tone car, but all Renault could say was that the colour on the tin was correct. Funny that when they took the car back they resprayed it completely before putting it on the forecourt.
Submitted: 2007-10-15 | ID: 289 | 1/10
![]()
I don’t know if anyone else has had this problem but the roof imploded on me whilst on the motorway! I bought a brand new Megane in May this year as I thought it a fun car with excellent safety standards. Not so! The electric window motor went after two months and then the shattering of the roof was the final straw! Nothing hit the roof; there was a sound like a gunshot and then the roof shattered, covering us in shards of glass. We think we are lucky to be alive as this happened on the motorway at speed. So, all you prospective buyers out there beware! Laminated safety glass? Forget it! And are Renault being a pain in the rear? What do you think!
Submitted: 2007-10-08 | ID: 278 | 1/10
![]()
This is a great car, really pleased with it. Very sporty looking and extremely nippy. Would have given it 5 stars but for the stupid name (who thinks these things up)?!
Submitted: 2007-09-29 | ID: 239 | 4/10
![]()
Simply the quickest hatch point to point I’ve ever had and all the experts agree. Goes like the clappers, handles like a dream, does 32+ to the gallon on the motorway. Looks stunning as well. Recently went to the Renault WS race day at Donington, 10th Sept ’07 and on the way down there kids in the backs of other cars were grinning, waving, pointing and giving the thumbs up as I passed them, no doubt saying either "wow" or " look at that dad!" . Seriously though, what a car. I had a 225 Cup before this R26, but this just grips so much better. For under £250 per month it cannot be beaten.
Submitted: 2007-09-21 | ID: 216 | 5/10
![]()
My 3rd totally reliable clio. Very comfortable and lovely to drive. Lots of room and economical too. 1.4 engine very responsive . Only complaint, suspension a bit on the firm side.
Submitted: 2007-09-14 | ID: 196 | 5/10
![]()
Wish there was 6 stars to offer! Great car , bigger than the old Clio and loads more va va voom....
Submitted: 2007-09-05 | ID: 172 | 5/10
![]()
One tip for future purchasers of this vehicle GET THE DIESEL!! The petrol is underpowered and thrashy at the top end whilst at the low end the torque leaves you wandering, well where the torque is to be honest. Apart from this the car looks well and the cabin space is a nice place to be. The roof works without fault which is novel for this end of the Coupe Cab sector, just please don't get the petrol.
Submitted: 2007-08-28 | ID: 119 | 3/10
![]()
Brilliant car, plenty of room inside, versatile, big enough for the family small enough to be economic and for city life. Lovely to drive.
Submitted: 2007-08-28 | ID: 116 | 4/10
![]()
A stylish car, nice to drive with a good feeling of safety. On the down side though, it does need filling up far more often that I would have hoped.
Submitted: 2007-08-23 | ID: 91 | 4/10
![]()
This car is one of those that you can’t help doing a double take at yet it’s not flashy, real understated class. The roof mechanism is quiet and efficient and and is indeed quick. I’ve not had the car long and the typical English summer we’ve been having has meant the roof has been up more than down but the glass roof makes up a little for this. Handling is surprisingly light and the drive very enjoyable.
Submitted: 2007-08-13 | ID: 70 | 4/10
![]()
I’ve been driving my Clio now for 5 months and it has given me 3500 faultless miles so far. Economical to run and insure, with enough storage space to suit all needs I’d thoroughly recommend this car to anyone.
Submitted: 2007-08-08 | ID: 42 | 5/10
![]()
An excellent all round family car with plenty of room for two children.Boot space also good.Handles road well.Safety features 100%.Only downside is the boot collects rain water so when you open it the water falls on your head!
Submitted: 2007-07-24 | ID: 3 | 4/10
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Allied | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |