10 February 2012
Follow us / Subscribe to newsletter
Consumer reviews by category
Useful information
| Tweet |
Nissan road tests and customer reviews. Submit your own Nissan review, read other driver's opinions or visit the best road test web sites available on the web.
Have your say!
Nissan lease prices ![]()
Nissan new cars and nearly new cars ![]()
1.5 dCI Manual Acenta Premium - The idea of sticking a supermini inside an SUV is an odd one but Nissan’s twisted crossover strikes a good balance and successfully integrates what motorists love most about both cars. Practicality may not be a strong point but a stylish and bubbly drive is virtually guaranteed. [...]
World Car of the Year 2011 the Nissan LEAF is the first mass production small family car powered purely by electricity. Designed from the wheels up as an electric car, the LEAF promises a new dawn in personal mobility. Protected from the upward spiral of petrol and diesel prices can this vanguard to [...]
One driver’s ultra-modern crossover is another oddball. Yes, it’s the Nissan Juke: a car more certain to split opinion than Marmite. For all its unusual-ness, though, the Juke is a fairly straightforward, if pricey, alternative to most superminis at heart. If the cost is a concern, take a look at th [...]
2011 - The first rule of launching a new car is it must move the game on from its predecessor. Nissan has decided to move the goal posts a little with its new Micra, which is designed as one car for the whole world, or at least 160 countries. So, no more Sunderland-built northern soul and in its place Chen [...]
A mild facelift keeps the Nissan Qashqai in the running as a family-friendly crossover that’s good to drive and affordable to own. There’s also the +2 model for those who need some extra space for people and luggage, while a new Pure Drive model lowers emissions. Otherwise, the Qashqai continues to [...]
1.5 dCi SE - Nissan introduced the NV200 to the European market as a concept at the Hanover Motor Show back in 2008 and the production model has set the tone for its future LCV line-up. The NV200 is a nimble package but it also looks good. Important for fleets who like their vehicles to have a bit of character. [...]
The Cube is an acquired motoring taste and one Nissan reckons will find 1000 buyers for in a year. This means the Cube will be a relatively rare sight on UK roads and this should help bolster used values. [...]
1.5dCi n-tec - Like VW’s Touareg, the Qashqai is named after desert-dwelling nomadic tribe, but unlike the Saharan Touaregs, the Qashqais hail from South Western Iran. What you may not know is that the new Qashqai n-tec comes with the full Nissan Connect infotainment system and, in this case, a new 1.5dCi engine. [...]
7-speed auto GT Ultimate - Nissan’s line of sporting Z cars dates back to the early ‘70s, but through the ‘80s and ‘90s the Zs accumulated flab and so weren’t quite as sporty as their badges suggested. Then in the early noughties came the 350Z – a properly hot driver’s machine, and now the 370Z – with extra chilli. [...]
2.0 dCi 150 Aventura - The X-Trail was first launched back in 2001 and was among the first of a new generation of so-called soft-roaders. In 2007 came the all-new X-Trail and, like its predecessor, this model is a lot more capable off-road than its soft-roader tag implies, while also being civilised enough for the school [...]
The Qashqai has won over scores of buyers since its introduction in 2006 and now the chunky, funky Nissan has sprouted an extra row of rear seats to cater for larger families. Mechanically it’s much the same as the outgoing Qashqai, but the Japanese manufacturer has reworked the exterior with some s [...]
2009 UK - A few months back we drove the 2009 Nissan Murano in American spec to give you a taste of what was to come…now we have got our hands on the UK version. [...]
2009 US - The 2009 Nissan Murano has grown up and it looks good– we have been able to get into the second generation of the stylish 4x4 on a test in Spain. This car will not be available in the UK until October and due to this early test drive we drove it in US specification as the UK spec won’t be ready unti [...]
1.6 16v Acenta R - The Nissan Note is a compact, roomy, well-planned and designed MPV that will be popular with families. The drive is good, enjoyable and running costs will be inexpensive. The Note will compete with the Vauxhall Meriva and Renault Modus in the compact MPV market but may also convert small family car [...]
Supercar - Nissan has launched the most powerful supercar that Japan has ever built. It has a power output of 437bhp that’s nearly 200bhp more than its predecessor, mouth watering – we think so. So Nissan are putting the £63,000 GT-R as a rival to the Porsche 911 Turbo which is about £9,000 more expensive – Ca [...]
2.0 dCi Acenta 4x4 - The Nissan Qashqai is a breath of fresh air – it’s stylish 4x4 image, spacious cabin and solid build make it a perfect choice for young families. The looks and driving position of an SUV that drives like a car. [...]
2.5 dCi SE MWB - At present the Nissan LCV range is one of the most varied on the market with its line up of vans and pick-ups. On this test we drove the Instar 2.5 dCi SE MWB and due to the alliance with Renault, the Interstar shares its platform with the Renault Master. It has a starting price of £22,280. [...]
2.5dCi Single Cab 4wd - Nissan has launched the NP300 and according to the Japanese maker – it’s a ‘proper’ pick-up which will be able to get to off-road sites ideal for the farming community or the construction industry. We agree with the marque it is a traditional pick-up truck, which will be an ideal business tool for t [...]
Outlaw 2.5 Dci - Relatively easy to handle for such a large vehicle, this rugged vehicle can offer the best of both worlds - everyday pick up or family estate 4x4. [...]
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 58 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 55 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 38 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 35 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 35 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 28 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 25 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 23 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 16 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 13 reviews )
Read real opinions: Thousands of consumer reviews on all major car and van models. |
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
The latest Nissan driver reviews and road test reports. The views expressed in these consumer reviews do not reflect the thoughts and opinions of ReallyGoodDomains.com
Submit a Nissan road test report
![]()
I’ve had my ’54 Navara d22 for three and a half years now and I love it. It’s comfortable to drive (especially having a dodgy back) and although I’ve heard the horror stories about con rod problems I’ve so far had no problems! She’s just approaching 88,000 miles now and I have regular oil and filter changes. I’m really hoping I haven’t jinxed myself now lol, but even though they may not be to everyone’s taste this car suits me down to the ground and I love, love, love it!
Submitted: 06/02/2012 18:39:27
![]()
I have owned and driven my Tekna since May 2007 and have been happily motoring during that time. However, having read some of the comments on this page I find that I have also experienced what would now appear to be common faults. I have just reaplced the rear shocks for the second time (the first was after 6 months and fell in the warranty period). I have also had an accident in my 4wd crossover during the snow of Feb 2010, which although going very slowly and in four wheel drive mode the car completely locked up and threw me across the road into a very deep cambered kerb. This resulted in considerable damge to the nearside front wheel and axle. At the time I was really shocked as I couldn’t have been doing more that 10 miles per hour and so blamed it on the weather conditions at the time. Perhaps this is also a perculiarity of the car? However, all in all I have thoroughly enjoyed my kumquat (a derogatory nickname provided by Jeremy Clarkson and adopted by me as a term of endearment) and would have definitely considered buying another if only the price had not been astronomically hiked due to the Qashqais popularity.
Submitted: 28/01/2012 21:22:09
![]()
I love the car when it is not in the garage for repair! I have it serviced regularly and carry out normal weekly checks. I have had the car three years and in that time it has had two new turbos (out of warranty), the last one only 10 months after the first one was fitted, but 3k past the warranty limit. The front brakes seized twice (difficulty in sourcing new calipers), it needed a new battery, which took three weeks to source. Its also had several engine management issues and several minor repairs to engine. It has cost over £4000 in repairs bills in three years, plus the normal servicing. Considering one of the main reasons I bought the car was for the reputed Nissan reliabilty I feel totally let down and I will never buy a Nissan again. It has also put off several friends.
Submitted: 25/01/2012 10:05:40
![]()
Fantastic car! It’s done 40,000 miles and I have had no problems whatsoever. The only issue I have had is with the window screen wipers and that is due to general wear and tear through all the mileage I have done with it! Yes it does feel a lot of bumps on the road, but that’s what I love about it! Cute looking car, big boot and always starts no matter how cold the weather! It has passed it’s MoT and is brilliant if you want a car that gets you from A-B. Cannot fault this car and its good sturdy engine at all!
Submitted: 24/01/2012 09:43:22
![]()
I went for a test drive in the NV and found it rather good considering that it is a car derived van. My kids liked the fact that they could stand up in it (they are 8 and 9 yrs). It rides nice and the height for the driver is great. The only complaint I have is the fact that there is not that many options availible, but I hope that will change with time.
Submitted: 13/01/2012 09:36:14
![]()
An excellent car. Buy it! I get 68mpg (from measuring fuel going in against trip mileage, the computer said 65) and pay only £20 per year road tax. The N-tec has a great spec and everything you could want including great Nissan connect satnav/phone bluetooth/stereo (which works great with the iphone). Some plastics are slightly cheap and cheerful, but overall fantastic value, I wish I had got one before now. In an era of cheap motoring being a necessity they are unbeatable. Ps: As a bonus they don’t have a DPF which is great.
Submitted: 08/01/2012 13:27:46
![]()
I’ve had this car for over a year now and I have replaced almost every electrical sensor on the damn thing. From the cat back exhaust, which only lasted around 18 months to the O2 sensors playing up repeatedly even after changing them twice. The parts are expensive and no one seems to stock them not even Nisssan, so if you break down you have a 2 day wait to get it going again. Nissan could have changed the wipers over so they didn’t back swipe water in front of your face as you drive. The front cross member rots through after a few years and is expensive to have replaced; I did mine myself for around £150 so I wouldnt want to guess what a garge would charge! A good car to drive when it is running ok, but there is a lot of body roll around corners due to it being a high sided car. The fuel consumption leaves a lot to be desired, I’m lucky if I get 30 mpg. It does have good acceleration though and will keep up with most things off the lights. There is loads of space in all its little storage holes and excellent boot space, with the storage nets being so handy in there.
Submitted: 04/01/2012 11:41:41
![]()
A fantasic van, which I have owned from new with no problems. The service costs are a little high, but its great for travelling long distances and it’s good on fuel.
Submitted: 27/12/2011 15:17:12
![]()
Further to my previous post: Well the headlight alignment problem proved to be a real ongoing swine of a fault.. Nothing on their database, but it was found to be bad earths (on manufacture) due to tags being bolted on to a painted chassis surface. It took them several attempts, but it’s now fixed. While all this was going on, the ECU went down leaving me with no starter and a scrambled display etc. I managed to bump start it and limp it back to the main dealer. At £750 a pop, I’m glad it’s still under full warranty! This is my fifth Nissan and I’ve never really had any electrical problems before. A careful run (Derby-York) achieved 63.8 mpg! A great engine and I still love it!
Submitted: 12/12/2011 21:13:38
![]()
My tyre has gone on my car after 10.000 miles. Nissan said the car is fine and this doesn’t come under the warranty so therefore it’s up to me to buy the new tyre. I will be printing off all these complaints and going back to my garage.
Submitted: 06/12/2011 12:42:22
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
![]()
This is my second Micra (Acenta) 2011 and it’s not up to the same standard as my first Aurbis. The side windows will not clear of rain when put down (I believe it’s a health and safety issue and a design fault). Nissan customer services have responded to my emails in a negative way, by not addressing my complaint.
Submitted: 30/11/2011 09:39:20
![]()
I have been driving cars, vans, m/cycles and motorhomes for more years than I want to remember I needed a small car and I only bought the Pixo after a lot of dithering because of the bad revues, but the low price was the deciding factor. I have owned my Pixo for 12 months and it has nearly 8000 miles on the clock. It’s a great little car, which drives well and holds the road like the proverbial to a blanket. I’m a little disappointed with the MPG, 45 Urban and 59 on long motorway runs. This year I have driven this car in 10 different Euopean countries and 7 capital cities, not counting the UK and I have never needed to top up the radiator or oil levels since the car was new. Also the tyre wear is less than I expected for the mileage covered. That’s my baby! Forget the doom and gloom merchants I would buy another Pixo.
Submitted: 29/11/2011 10:02:23
![]()
I like the car a lot, but it’s replacing a 1994 Opel Campo Pickup so my view might be distorted! It does bump a bit on bad roads, but acceptable. Pros: roomy, just in between a Caddy/Berlingo and the larger van’s. Very easy to drive in a town, easy steering and high point of view. Cons: had to put on extra mirror’s, too much you don’t see on your left and right. Dirt collects in a pocket, which is visible if you open the door and look down. Make sure you clean that regularly or it might start to rust there. I regularly collect leaves and stuff in there. Tip: to remove the interior panel clips you have to pull and rotate anticlockwise, they pop out easily that way. (need a tool to do so) To get to the radio: two Philips screws above the ashtray. Pull to remove the surroundings of the gearchange lever. Remove the two screws on the bottom of the heaterassy. Remove the refresh/recycle button by pushing it upwards. No need to remove the other buttons. Pull on the plastic lips near the screws you removed and there you are! It does need a bit of force, I had to use pliers to grip the lips.
Responses to this review
Yes, I agree the mirrors do give a funny distorted view, I thought I would get used to them, but a couple of stick-on "fish-eyes" may be the answer - Jerry Woodward from Derbyshire
Submitted: 22/11/2011 08:43:42
![]()
I bought my 2001 Primera 2.0d estate for £921 from Ebay. It had 120000 miles on it and I hoped it would last a year or two. I had it for 3 years and only bought new tyres. I covered 35000 miles and only gave it one oil change with nothing else spent in 3 years! It passed 2 MOT’s with no faults whatsoever, failing the 3rd mot with too much sill welding being required. It was 11 years old at this point, so it was sold for spares/scrap. I’m confident that if not for the rust it would have had years left in it. I never had a problem with it at all, even with no servicing/maintenance except 1 oil change in 35000 miles. In this time it carried huge loads of building waste/timber, a corner suite strapped to the roof, and plenty more and it just kept on going. It did about 43mpg, which isn’t too bad and was a pretty good drive with loads of space and a huge boot. I can’t really fault it.
Submitted: 09/11/2011 09:37:22
![]()
I wanted a 4X4 to replace my ageing Honda HRV (which gave faultless service! Sold Honda at 110K ). Bought a 29000 2.5 X-Trail petrol and converted to LPG (as I had done with the Honda). The consumption on petrol was 27mpg best, but on LPG equivalent returned 40+ mpg. Problems started at 50K miles. The oil consumption increased dramatically, 1pt per 50miles. The oil control rings stuck. Rings valves etc replaced also the catalytic convertor. Blew a head gasket (?) at 60K miles, head skimmed etc. At 67K miles it blew out all water with a cracked cylinder head; I replaced with another set of valves and a recon head. Now the engine is suffering from a misfire on both petrol and LPG . The diagnostic checker cannot detect where the fault lies. I like the vehicle to drive and for comfort, but I cannot afford to have such poor reliability. (In 1994 I had a 2.0D Primera and it was fantastic, 100K on the clock until a crash wrote it off. What has happened to Nissan?)
Submitted: 06/11/2011 21:29:59
![]()
One of the best cars of Nissan.
Submitted: 26/10/2011 08:21:34
![]()
A Great car! I have covered over 250,000 miles since buying the car second-hand in 2003. The fuel pump was replaced at about 140,000 miles and the EGR valve has just been diagnosed as ’stuck open’, but other than that all repairs have been due to wear and tear (one wheel bearing, disks and pads etc). I would definitely buy another!
Submitted: 24/10/2011 12:32:12
![]()
Hi! I bought a new Tekna in June 2010 as I needed a reliable 4x4 with 7 seats. I absolutely loved the car, it’s so nice to drive, with excellent space for the family and enough room in the boot for a pushchair and shopping with 7 seats out. Then in May this year it made a clonking noise and stopped moving. The local dealer took it in and said there had been a major fault with the rear differential, which needed replacing which was done under the warranty. It had its annual service a month later where they told me they had found a severe leak (sorry can’t remember the details), so it went in and was fixed under the warranty again. Since the rear differential was ’fixed’ I had noticed that when setting off from standstill and going up hills the car would shudder a little until it moved into a different gear. When one of the rear door handle hinges broke last week I rang up the dealership and explained to them about the door handle and the shuddering. The car went in today and I was told that the front differential has now gone and that the engineer had reported it looked like ’driver abuse’ !!! The service rep first asked me if I was the only driver of the car, which I am apart from occasionally when my husband drives it, but he only ever really drives it when the whole family are in it. I asked the service rep what would constitute driver abuse, he replied driving really fast, wheel spinning and driving it like a rally car. I am a housewife who does the school run, pops to the shops etc. I am no rally driver! The service rep knows me from my very many dealings with him in the past and he said that he had told the engineer that I wasn’t ’the type’! He also asked if I always used it in 4x4. I leave it in Auto, which the salesman told me to do as the car should change automatically from 2-4wd depending on the terrain etc. - Is that right? So they have sent the details to Nissan to approve the warranty. What concerns me is if the engineer has written - looks like driver abuse, then they may try to get out of covering it. I’ve searched the internet for similar experiences of the 2010 model, but haven’t found anything yet. And even if they do fix it for free how many more problems will I face? Why have I had so many problems? I know that you get ’niggles’ with new cars - fair enough, but these are major faults and I really don’t want to be acussed of wrecking what should be a pretty robust car. The trouble is that I researched buying this car so thoroughly, it was the best car for us and I would be reluctant to buy a different make, but I’m thinking that maybe the best option in the near future. I’m Gutted!
Submitted: 19/10/2011 10:29:23
![]()
We love our car! We bought a place in France and needed to lug loads of stuff from the uk over there. We could not have made a better choice for comfort, reliability, space in the rear etc. The only downside we have found is that the opening for the hatchback is limited compared to the space inside; great for fitting in lots of smaller items, but if the opening was larger there would be enough space to carry much larger items too. Also the sat nav doesn’t work from postcodes, which would be an advantage, but these are very minor complaints really. We highly recommend this as a family bus!!
Submitted: 19/10/2011 10:19:12
![]()
I bought my X-Trail at one-year old and with 11,000 miles, and over the past 8 years I have added 280,000 miles. They haven’t been trouble free miles, but I guess the problems have been relatively few considering the miles it has covered. The main problems have been; the fuel pump at about 120,000 miles, a corroded oil sump and problems with brake callipers at 230,000. At 260,000 miles I experienced intermittent power loss, which ultimately turned out to be a problem with the EGR valve sticking, and eventually sticking open. Thanks to the AA man for fixing that. There hasn’t been many other problems, and it handled trips to Frankfurt and Inverness with no complaints. Only temperatures of -20C in Frankfurt, causing the diesel to ’become sticky’ caused me many delays through the last two bad winters. I still love driving the car and at the moment have no desire to replace it - with 291,000 miles on the clock, the car runs extremely well and seems to pull as well as it ever did.
Submitted: 19/10/2011 09:57:09
![]()
I have a 2007 Nissan pathfinder 2.5 DCI. It’s fantastic. There is nothing I can’t throw at this car that it can’t handle. It’s so practical. Ok so it drives like an old school 4x4 but it’s so simple and reliable. I bought it second hand over two years ago and I have not had any problems with it. I don’t use Nissan for service, I use an independent 4x4 specialist. I’m not keen on the £460 road tax and the fuel consumption is a bit poor, around 26 mpg on short journeys and 28.5 on a run. I would like to see 30 mpg but hey, it’s a big old truck. My mate’s Disco 4 only gets 25 mpg at best so I don’t feel too hard done by. At least my Pathy does not spend half it’s life at the dealer like my mate’s Disco does. His Discovery might be a nicer drive, but it’s not without it’s problems. In fact he told me the only way to own a Disco is to change it every three years and not let it go out of warranty or you’ll need to sell your house to keep it on the road! The Pathfinder is simple and reliable and massively practical, you’ll do well to find a better package for the money!
Submitted: 17/10/2011 10:59:15
![]()
Mine is a mobility vehicle. When I picked it up from the dealers, it was fine for a while but had to get the sat nav/cd player changed as the sat nav told me I was moving whilst I was parked and the cd kept ’stuttering’. There was a ’noise’ from the dash to the right of the steering wheel which is something to do with the fuel pump and even though this was ’sorted’ it still makes a slight noise. The dealers ’Chorley Nissan’ in Wigan were very good and even replaced the sat nav console at great expense to themselves. Overall, the drive is perfect, road handling very good, comfort excellent and the torque of the 1.5 very impressive. The heated seats in winter are a godsend, reversing camera excellent. I’ve done some miles in mine and really have no complaints. It’s sad to hear other people experiencing terrible inconveniences with their vehicles and dealers. I’m not intending to ’promote’ my dealer but I have found their service and aftercare wonderful. I would recommend a Qashqai Tekna 1.5 Dci to anyone. There are plenty of alternative vehicles on the market but I’m more than happy to choose another Qashqai when I have to replace mine.
Submitted: 13/10/2011 11:56:39
![]()
Mine has an immobiliser fault, so only starts sometimes! It’s about time Nissan sorted these faults out as they are costly to get checked and in a lot of cases the garage can’t sort the fault. Nissan should know that this puts people off buying their cars even though overall their cars are great to drive.
Submitted: 28/09/2011 10:15:01
![]()
I have had this vehicle now for four years and have covered 93000 klm with no issues other than the 4x4 light coming on due to a faulty switch on a few occasions. I like the Navara and find it comfortable; it does not handle too bad for a 4x4 truck as long as you use good tyres. On the motorway it is as comfortable as any car. It has never towed much or been off road; I am a musician and carry all my pa in the back and it suits me quite well. It’s quite scary reading some reviews of other owner experiences, but fingers crossed so far so good. I intend to keep this vehicle for a long time.
Submitted: 19/09/2011 11:18:21
![]()
I bought my 2012 Qashqai just one month ago but unluckly had an accident 3 days ago. I was on an irregular road and the vehicle tipped after losing control on dry dirt. My 4x2 was completely destroyed after 4 spins over a cain yard. Me and 2 other companions are gratefully fine. Any bruises we have were caused by trying to escape the tipped-over vehicle. Although I am not sure what really caused the vehicle to lose control the tyres lost all traction, which might have been the reason for the accident. Nevertheless the three of us are still alive after this incident, which is truly because we all had our seat belts on, which by the way did not stick or bruise us. Quite an adrenaline rush and thanking god for keeping us in this world!
Responses to this review
Same thing happened to me. Going round a left hand bend when I lost control, sent to other side and hit oncoming car. The ABS did not work and I do not know what happened to cause me to lose control - Rav Ima from Ireland
Submitted: 11/09/2011 09:08:23
![]()
Warning: I purchased a Navara to tow my horse box trailer. They are great in a straight line going fowards but I have to reverse up a lane and round a tight corner on tarmac and mud and I was unaware that these pickups cannot be reversed in 4 wheel drive low. I burnt a clutch out in 1 week and was told not to continue using the pick up as it could snap the drive shaft. I have now swapped for a Discovery 3. A costly lesson, so be careful when choosing your towing vehicle.
Submitted: 11/09/2011 08:25:12
![]()
The Navara is a good car, I’m 17 and it’s my first car. It has good visability all the way around and it’s good to drive. Only one bad thing, the back end slips when taking a corner or on a wet road.
Responses to this review
Hi with you being 17, how much is insurance and who is it with please? I need one for me and my band, I’m 17. I tried to get VW camper but can’t get insurance - Bobby Dodger from Nottinghamshire
Submitted: 07/09/2011 10:04:05
![]()
Having had our Navara serviced every 6 months or so, we had approximately 20 seconds worth of tapping then BANG!!! Now the engine strip and rebuild is about to cost us over £3000. Nissan - I used to love the D22 fantastic vehicle however am now very angry!!! And will never buy one again!! If this engine rebuild works (which lets face it at 3000 miles it blinking well should, it’d better not go again !!) I’m wondering if I should save my money and get rid of it for parts and buy something worth my time?!!
Submitted: 05/09/2011 10:24:06
![]()
Besides the regular maintenance, there are no costs whatsoever. A very reliable car and on LPG, it is extremely economical.
Submitted: 05/09/2011 09:35:07
![]()
I have owned my Almera Tino for 6 months and I wish I had never bought it. It’s noisy, sore on petrol and badly built; if this is Nissan reliability I am going back to vauxhall. The gearstick started rattling like a rattlesnake a month after I bought it, the engine management light has come on twice, the cd player has packed in, one of the rearseat levers for folding down seat has snapped and my wife has started calling it our very own ice cream van because of the way it rolls going round corners. Nissan reliability my ar**! Never again.
Submitted: 01/09/2011 11:29:28
![]()
Brilliant, great car to drive, ok not hot hatch scorching but good. Diesel is giving 53mpg (calculated not dash reading) between motorway and city driving so I’m pleased. Boot could be bigger and rear looks small until you get in there, where it feels comfortable. Handles and rides comfortably with good driver feel, a bit of roll but it whips through bends ok. Sat and ICE good. Would buy another.
Submitted: 31/08/2011 11:45:48
![]()
The latest incarnation of the X-Trail comes supplied with Nissan’s brilliant (but also useless) Connect Premium sat-nav (or sat-lost) + audio system. The following applies to all Nissan UK models with this system (XZ-trail, Navara, Pathfinder, Murano,370Z); When you buy this you get a 40GB hard drive with the sat-nav pre installed (no back-up discs), but what you won’t get told is that Nissan (or any other firm) have never released any mapping update discs so whatever the age of the map data when you buy the vehicle this is the mapping you have to use for the whole life of the vehicle!! So it can be up to 2 years out of date when purchased new! As a £1500 extra this is very expensive for what is in effect an unusable and unsafe sat-nav system. Nissan UK customer service/technical couldn’t care less. The dealer was very helpful in trying to solve the problem, but once purchased "Premium" in this case means lowest class with no support. My advice? Do NOT buy any Nissan vehicle with Connnect ’Premium’ HDD infotainment-sat-nav system!! I love my X-Trail, but not the Connect Premium system or Nissan UK Customer service.
Submitted: 30/08/2011 13:08:46
![]()
Ugly car but kinda cool.
Submitted: 23/08/2011 08:22:35
![]()
Awful! The worst driving experince of my life. I couldn’t drive it straight as it kept wondering all over the road and it just wouldn’t stop bouncing. The slightest touch of the steering wheel would make it swerve all over the place with it bouncing all the while. I had to drive this damn truck from Southampton to Poole on a very hot day; the heat from the engine was driving me mad and I’m still mad now 2 days later. Because the sun was out and I had forgoten my sun glasses I put the sun visor down, only to find my vision totaly blocked. I did however, catch a glimse of the road between bounces - did I mention that these trucks bounce a lot? I could have made a fortune if I’d charged poeple £5 a time for a bouncy castle ride! The sad thing is this is the 3rd one of these things our company has owned and everyone moans about them, perhaps if the boss had to drive it to and from work he would realise just how bad these things are, but I guess he’s fine in his BMW. If you do have to drive one to work I would suggest sitting in a darkend room for several hours afterwards to get over the shock.
Submitted: 21/08/2011 15:51:34
![]()
Once you have learnt to live with some of the comments made by friends which vary from superb to ugly, you settle down and wonder why you had not thought of this car before. It is practical and roomy, extremely easy to manoevre and drive. The car was bought for my wife and she is thrilled to bits with it. The level of equipment and build quality is superb . Having spent 30 odd years in the trade I can honestly say it is difficult to find fault in this car.
Submitted: 18/08/2011 10:06:39
![]()
This is my wife’s car, a replacement for her Micra, which was also reviewed on this website. My first impressions of the Note is it is more comfortable than the Micra, more spacious and noticably quicker and more economical. I’ve achieved at one point, on a motorway, 60 mpg. Performance-wise, the note is quicker than the Micra because it has a larger and more powerful 1.4 litre engine and a manual gearbox, the Micra only had a 1.2 litre engine and an automatic. The only downside to the car is that the gearing is too short for my liking and I think that the car would have done better with a 6th gear, it certainly has the pulling power to cope with a 6th gear. Apart from the short gears, I think the car is near-enough perfect and is better equipped, and more reliable, than your equivalent Fiesta or Corsa from the same year.
Responses to this review
I have owned a Nissan Note for four years and have now covered 62,000 miles in it. My Note is a diesel and I get up to 66mpg and never less than 61mpg. For a small car, it is very versatile for rear passengers and luggage, though a compromise if both are needed at the same time! It has been incredibly reliable and apart from one set of new brakes and several tyres, the only maintenance needed as well as the normal servicing has been three light bulbs and a new sunvisor (as the other one kept flopping down!) - Alan too from Devon
Submitted: 14/08/2011 14:21:47
![]()
Short gearing and small boot apart, a great little car.
Submitted: 14/08/2011 14:04:02
![]()
As a former driver of both Nissan cubistar and Nissan Primastar I don’t like the Nv 200. Without a load it is too stiff on the springs, feels like an old tractor to drive. It is also too nervous for a sidewind. Even the cubistar has more space in the driver’s cabin. The lump where the window controls are; why did they have to place it exactly where the knee should rest? And why does the console for the gearstick need to take so much space where my other knee should rest? Also the storage space in the cabin is terrible. The keylock remote and keyless start are Ok, but there is no natural space to put the remote. There is no place to put papers or my telephone, except in the cup/bottleholder. No. Give me back my cubistar.
Responses to this review
Didn’t you test drive it before you bought it? - David Lott from Spain
Submitted: 11/08/2011 09:31:27
![]()
I bought this van with 24,000 km on the clock with a full service history. It drove fantastically well for the first 9 months, then one day while driving along at about 100 kph it cut out on main road. The light that indicates an injector fault was on as I coasted to a stop (50,000 km on clock now). After being plugged in at garage I was told that injector 1 and 2 were faulty. The main dealer price was €614 each including vat. I bought them reconditioned for about €200 each. After being put in injector 3 and 4 read faulty so they were also replaced, but there was still a problem with misfiring. A compression test came next, which showed there was no compression on cylinder 4 as the valves were stuck open with carbon. After sorting that out and putting the van back together it now runs well, but has cost about €3,000 to fix so far as it was out of warranty. Bad engine design means the injectors were sitting in an inch of water, I was lucky to be able to get them out...others were not so lucky. If I’d known then what I know now I would not have bought one of these vans. The only Nissan part is the badge, the rest is Renault. I’m not happy.
Submitted: 09/08/2011 15:44:41
![]()
What a fantastic family car. We bought it new and in 103000km we have only replaced brake pads and have never had to top up oil between services. It has been regularly serviced by the dealer every 15000 km and although this is the pricier option we have been very satisfied with its performance. As you can tell the mileage is high and we do a fair amount of traveling often on dirt roads and it has always performed. Will definitely be sticking with this model!
Submitted: 03/08/2011 07:27:55
![]()
I bought this car in April of 2011 and since then I’ve done 8000 miles on and off of the beaten track, with no modifications other than some BFG A/T tyres. The car performs perfectly in every single aspect. It goes anywhere, pulls anything and drinks less fuel than my Discovery 3 (32mpg to be precise, bare in mind it tows and goes off road a lot, this is something I never achieved from my previous Wildtrak at 18mpg under exactly the same conditions). It is even almost as comfortable as the Discovery. I couldn’t think of a better pickup for around the farm with as high a standard of build quality other than a Toyota or perhaps even the Amarok and at the end of the day that choice comes down to preference.
Submitted: 22/07/2011 15:52:18
![]()
I have owned my Qashqai+2 for over 2 years now so feel qualified in giving an accurate assessment of the car. I bought the car new in 2009 during the scrappage scheme for £14k, an excellent price for such a well equipped car. I did my homework on which engine would best suit my needs and the 1.6L petrol was the clear winner. It has the same bhp and torque as my old 1.8L Peugeot 406, but with much better mpg. The +2 is quite a big car and the 1.6L engine is fine around town and fully loaded on motorway journeys, only showing its lack of power on very steep hills. The most difficult decision I had was whether to buy the Accenta model, but I couldn’t justify the extra £1800. The Visia came with excellent standard equipment including panoramic roof and roof rails. The Visia’s 16" wheels means the alloys are well above the height of most kerbs and new tyres cost £50/tyre less than 17" tyres. The +2 is great to drive and I feel the car is more refined than the standard Qashqai. The car looks great, but it is let down by the quality of materials used in the cabin. The seat cloth is a very thin polyester and appeared worn after only a few weeks of use. Any contact with the plastic trim will unfortunately scar it for life; I haven’t seen plastic this bad in any car before. The car has been very reliable, but had the rear shock absorbers were replaced after only 18 months, a common failure with all Qashqais. The alloy wheels have also been replaced, they started corroding after only 7 months! The after sales service from AC Nissan, Linwood, has been excellent, the best I’ve experienced. Servicing and faults were all carried out while I waited; all 4 alloys were replaced and the car valeted in under 2 hrs. The Qashqai would have scored 5 stars had it not been for the quality issues. The car is well put together, but some blunders have been made on choices of materials. Popularity has meant that Nissan has raised the price of the car quite a bit. To buy the same car today would cost £18k and it doesn’t have the panoramic roof, roof rails or ultrasonic alarm. I would recommend the Qashqai and would certainly consider buying another future model.
Responses to this review
We have owned the QQ+2 Tekna 1.6L since 5 September 2011. It’s a nice comfortable car and my wife really likes the comfort and size. But there is a big down side. The Qashqai+2 really struggles (without) load to accelerate. Even on moderate hills, the 1.6L petrol engine can hardly propel the car forward. And on the flat, any idea of overtaking seems non-viable. I really wish we had bought the 2.0L version. I want to get rid of the car already. Not sure why Nissan sells such an underpowered car :-( Also, we only seem to be getting 30mpg (not as much as we had expected). My expensive mistake - Derrick Khan from England
Submitted: 22/07/2011 13:26:13
![]()
After many years with a VW Transporter this nNV00 is so up to date, my old van felt like a tank in comparison. With new emission regs coming up in January this van does well on the juice. This van is the only one about, which can replace The Transporter as it comes close to size and carry capacity; with the seat down it can carry 2.4 x 600mm board or 2.7m timbers and still give 50 or more mpg. I Looked at Vivaros and Trafics second hand, but too expensive. I like the NV200 the best and it’s got enough gadgets too. If you try it you will like it. The cabin is very roomy. A bit smaller than the Transporter but a good van.
Submitted: 22/07/2011 07:51:59
![]()
I chose this car instead of the Audi TT roadster as I wanted something different and I’m very glad I went with this car instead. It has a brilliant direct and fun ride and handling style and has evreything you would expect inside a BMW or Audi rival. The fit and finish is first class. A year into a three year lease, and I’m still loving jumping into it first thing in the morning.
Submitted: 16/07/2011 18:55:00
![]()
My car has done only 26,000 miles and I am now told that it requires 3 new coil springs. It seems to me that this is not of " merchantable quality." Nissan UK are not interested, stating fair wear and tear. Where is the ’fairness’ in that?
Responses to this review
Just had one spring replaced under a garage warranty. It was fractured and snapped while reversing off my drive. Investigations on the interweb showed a rash of fractured springs at the beginning of this year on 2007 Nissans. This is without a doubt a Nissan problem - springs should not fracture! - Pete Flynn from Ireland
Submitted: 16/07/2011 18:27:48
![]()
I bought a new Note 1.4S on a 56 plate. It has now done 113,000 miles. In last year’s freeze it was left at Manchester Airport for 2 weeks at -10C to -15C and started first turn of the key. The Note has been totally reliable. P and B Nissan in Louth have done the services every 12,000 miles and nothing else has been needed., except headlamp bulbs. Excellent attention from a small family garage much better than the main dealers! The Note doesn’t use any oil and gives 45 to 48 MPG, if you have regard for the speed limits. Running on Michelin Energy tyres they last 40,000 miles a set. For its size it can carry interesting loads including a tandem! It’s a good car to drive with a well sorted balance of cornering ability and ride joined by light and easy controls.
Submitted: 13/07/2011 10:27:31
![]()
The Qashqai is absolutely a good car because of the jacked-up suspension. Great car.
Submitted: 11/07/2011 09:49:07
![]()
Bring back the Nissa Micra 999cc please! I’m surprised Nissan dare put their name to this trundling bathtub. I trap my fingers regularly in what passes for door pockets, can’t see through the rear window when it rains as the rear wiper only sweeps the left hand side of the window. The rear window ledge issues a mighty thump each time you pass over the tiniest bump. To be quite honest I can’t really give it a star rating as it doesn’t deserve one. I hope number one is the lowest rating - it would be nice if you told us what the numbers signify.
Responses to this review
Acting on behalf of a friend who bought a Nissan Pixo and is now regretting change after needing a new clutch after only 3340 miles in 18 months at a cost of £900. She wishes she had her old Toyota of 15 years with very little problems. Do not buy a Pixo, pleeeeeease! - John Sadler from Surrey
Submitted: 08/07/2011 09:27:22
![]()
Always wanted one of these cars from the moment I first saw one. Glad to say that I have finally got my claws into one and I love it. There is lots of other models to choose from if you are looking for a small coupe, but the 370Z offered the best of everything; looks, power, drive, fun and affordability.
Submitted: 01/07/2011 09:41:24
![]()
The Nissan Leaf is a lot more spacious than I ever would have expected, with plenty of room for all the family. So far electric cars have always been on the small side; but not this car. While the range of just 100 miles might sound a bit scary at first when you are use to the range of 100’s of miles, it is worth adding up what you actually do in a day; you might be surprised and find the Leaf’s range is ample. I always wanted to drive an electric car for the green credentials and because they are so quiet, but it offers so much more than that; it is also dirt cheap to run! Around 2p per mile thank you very much and very smooth and easy to drive. Very happy.
Submitted: 01/07/2011 09:38:23
![]()
Very low maintenance car. It has plenty of space and ideal all year round!
Submitted: 30/06/2011 08:32:48
![]()
I bought my 2 litre diesel in February and do approx 850 miles per week, so wanted something reliable (unlike my last car). This fit the bill and so far no complaints. It’s very nice and despite what was said is very economical doing 600 miles from a full tank of diesel. I would recommend the car to others.
Submitted: 29/06/2011 10:33:13
![]()
I bought my Qashqai last year second hand with only 12,000 miles. This is a superb car and had never let me down. I have done some upgrades since with heated leather seats and chrome sidebars and a satnav unit with TV and DVD. Although it’s a small engine, it pulls well and unless you’re after a fast SUV then this is simply an amazing car. The only reason I’ve not given it five stars is that nothing is perfect!
Submitted: 20/06/2011 10:53:23
![]()
I have had cabstars for 15 years and have had the misfortune to own a 2007 cabstar. The rear gyres went flat after 50 miles, battery failed after 6 months, then the exhaust failed, after 12 months rust started appearing everywhere on the underside of the truck, crunching gears which Nissan said they could not notice on a road test, front shock absorbers failed after two years, main wiring loom rotted through after two and a half years Nissan just repaired it. At the end of the third year I contacted my Nissan main dealer twice about the rust situation on both occasions they took pictures then I was ignored, now the ladder rack is cracked due to a stress fracture and now the rust under the drivers seat is that bad the brackets that hold the seat in place have rusted away and the seat moves about when you sit on it and the van has only done 47k. Finally the tailboard is falling off because the welds have rotted on the fixings, the brakes constantly squeak and now have trouble with the front wheel bearing.
Submitted: 13/06/2011 18:45:09
![]()
I think the Nissan juke looks like a frog. It drives very nice, nice car.
Submitted: 13/06/2011 09:05:04
![]()
I had the manual and works very good!
Submitted: 13/06/2011 08:56:09
![]()
Fuel injectors, turbo and almost everything else that could go wrong with an engine has happened. Had the engine rebuilt after a valve broke and messed up the head replaced all valves and injectors 7-8 months ago, only to find the injectors have gone again. I do not use another diesel only topaz and never the cheaper diesel. I never use petrol or any products to clear the injectors. I also replaced the air flow meter and sometimes lose power when in 5th gear for a while, then it comes back when I knock it off and restart up again.
Submitted: 05/06/2011 16:17:29
![]()
I bought my note 1.5dci second hand with 23000 mls on clock have done 27000 mls on top of this figure in just 16 months and so far no problems to report. Great economy comfy ride loads of space for my German pointer dogs. Very economical to run approx £10 every 100 miles sometimes a little more. It behaves really well in the worst of weather conditions and feels really safe I have driven though a few floods and lots of snow and ice here in Wales and have been very pleased with the cars performance in these conditions. The only change I would ask is is to make it a little less noisey. Otherwise a wise buy for space comfort and economy and reliability. Oh and I like the quirky looks!
Submitted: 01/06/2011 09:27:19
![]()
I have a 2007 D40 navara ute, at 50,000 km was told injectors need to be replaced and front brake rotors, cost to me $4,600. After two meetings at Nissan head office Australia, these repairs are being done by Nissan no cost to me. As for fuel use, 10 litres per 100km dry and 14 litres per 100km towing my caravan - weight is 1800 kg. I will not say a bad thing about the Nissan.
Submitted: 01/06/2011 08:28:23
![]()
This my third Nissan Primastar in 9 years but first crew cab lwb. I can not praise these vans enough and have had all from new with mileages as follws when sold first had 58,000 second had 53,000 and current has 44,000 apart from tyres and brake pads I have had no issues with any of them. Have read the comments and all I can assume is you have been unlucky. would not hessitate to buy a fourth one.
Submitted: 21/05/2011 23:48:20
![]()
Hi, I bought my primastar in 2009 as an ex demonstrator with 7000 miles, I have now done 76000 without so much as a cough. It gets used daily fom morning ’til night without much let up. I service it reguarly and I don’t drive it like an idiot. Absolutely brilliant van, it’s comfortable, has plenty of poke and pulling power and I would recommend it to anyone.
Submitted: 21/05/2011 22:52:56
![]()
I bought our Nissan new Sept.2004 And had it serviced by the main dealer every year. It has done us proud, I have yet to change even a bulb! We have a boat and lug much boating items to and fro. including diving gear in its wipe clean boot area, I have no faults other then having cars with better brakes especially handbrake as I need to fully apply and plus when loaded. I would buy another having had a Freelander on long demo, but due to the extortionate cost and reliability probs decided on a Japanese car with controllable 4x4, comfort and 40plus to the gallon.
Submitted: 17/05/2011 14:34:54
![]()
Bought an Nissan X-Trail Columbia at Maindealer 27,000 miles. Ran it 5000 and now have to replace Flywheel and Clutch. This car has no tow bar and I am a senior thus drive in a civilised manner. Mechanic reports Brake pads and discs badly worn and scoured despite dealer service on purchase. On purchase there was an oil leak, which they tried to convince me was from the Aircon. Totally disillusioned with Japanese manufacturers and their UK wheeler dealerships.
Submitted: 13/05/2011 10:46:15
![]()
I brought my Almera in 2003 with 28000 miles on the clock. Although not the worlds most exciting car it has been totally reliable and has now reached 107000 miles. I’ve had no significant costs but my MOT tester still needs the odd pound of flesh. On balance reliable, discrete and economical.
Submitted: 08/05/2011 19:09:06
![]()
I am not in my 20’s and yet the Nissan JUKE has captured my years of driving experience. Its not quite Race material but it sets me back in my seat upon turbo assisted acceleration. This car leaves the driver feeling they are ’noticed’. I’m a little disapointed in the fuel economy but everyone who has seen it admires it’s snappy, unique exterior and it’s sporty interior. Everything I wanted in my next car, this JUKE has it all. Easy to recommend. The insurance and premium fuel may cost a bit more but one needs to accept that there is generally always a price to pay for such quality. I’m also a licensed auto mechanic but all it offers pushes even my skilled mechanical expertise. I LOVE IT!
Submitted: 30/04/2011 09:16:27
![]()
Bought mine s/h, 10 months old, only 3k on the clock, from a main dealer. Had it for nearly 2 months now, and it is pretty impressive, compared to my old Vanette cargo, which I had for 8 or 9 years. 2 faults, headlight alignment, and a rattling exhaust were both fixed the following day after booking it in. THINGS I LIKE: Performance: Initial concerns that a 1461cc engine, and a 5 speed box wouldn’t be up to it on a van this size, proved to be unfounded. It is nippy, and the ratios seem just about right even with a decent load on. Handling: Seems to be glued to the road, even in the wet. (Maybe the OEM Dunlops). Great turning circle for a FWD vehicle. Economy: 50+ mpg is easily achievable unless you thrash it. Comfort: Nice seats, driving position and visibility. However the quietness of the engine is somewhat offset by the rather excessive road noise. Nice radio. THINGS I’LL JUST GET USED TO: Fierce brakes, Over-light power steering, "grabby"clutch, clutch pedal too high, Thin, hard, "toothbrush handle" steering wheel, Feather-light, but rather "notchy" gearbox. Sometimes reverse won’t go in properly. THINGS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE BETTER: No 30 MPH on the speedo scale, and the KPH scale is illegible. The digital display could be bigger (there is room), and higher contrast. The worst thing is the controls for the display use the legacy stalks on the speedo, only accessable through the steering wheel, hopeless when the vehicle is in motion. No passenger arm-rest (there is room). Stowage space: all the wrong size/shape and placement, much of it useless. Where is the cover for the glove box? Nowhere to put a large format map book at all. A COUPLE OF TIPS: A 12x10x5 inch food container fits nicely under the passenger seat, giving a bit more out-of-sight storage for bits and bobs. I have (temporarily) removed the bulkheads. They bend backwards into the load space quite bit, reducing the load length by 9-12 inches. You need a T40 star-driver and a 10mm socket, but you have to drill off the 2 tamper-proof (silver) dome headed bolts also. This means I can now take advantage of the clever fold-flat passenger seat, should I need to carry something long, like a ladder. CONCLUSION: A great innovative design, just let down by a few obvious, mainly cosmetic, shortcomings. But I love it really.
Submitted: 25/04/2011 20:47:08
![]()
Own a 2004 Almera 1.8 Auto, bought for my wife a year ago (less than 30000 miles on the clock). First impressions were - poor handling, loud engine, cheap tinny construction, slow, but reasonable equipment level with a good stereo. However reliability has been appalling with major faults (coolant leak, power steering fluid leak) as well as minor (faulty switches, boot sticks shut, vibration at 70mph). Awful car.
Responses to this review
I think you’ve been really unlucky, Martin. I bought an ’04 1.8SE automatic in October 2006 with 27,000 on the clock. I’ve still got my one now, and it’s done 104,000. Two light bulbs blowing aside, I’ve not had one problem with it! It’s passed every MOT, and reliability wise, the best car I’ve ever had! - Colin from London
Submitted: 25/04/2011 11:02:21
![]()
Bought summer 2009 when 1 year old. It has been a great car until now. A good drive, but not very fuel efficient. The car has been in our local Nissan garage for 1 week and yesterday we were told we are facing a £3600 bill for replacement of clutch, slave cylinder and fly wheel!!!!!!!!! The car has only done 40,000 miles. None of this covered by our Nissan Warranty, which has 1 month left to run, due to wear and tear!
Responses to this review
They are robbers, the turbo has gone on my 18 month old Qashqai after 50,000 miles - white smoke coming out of exhaust. The car eventually got picked up by the dealers who came up with an excuse about the warranty so I got fed up, pulled the car from dealers and got a friend to do the work. Turbo cost £1,700, it also filled the catalyst with oil, that cost £570 for new unit. Is there a common fault with the turbos which are Renault units? - Chris Phillips from Lancashire
I also have the same problem! I bought a Nissan Qashqai 1.5 turbo diesel engine in October 2007. I have already replaced the turbo twice. First, in December 2009 after approximately 27,000 miles, and now after approximately 54,000 miles. I’m very disappointed with Nissan because I thought their cars were very reliable but I’ve found out that is not true. I don’t know what to do with the car because every two years I have to replace the turbo! - Helena Mouriño from Portugal
Renault Megane Scenic had many turbo troubles, last one I had was Megane Scenic fidji 1.9 Dci 52 plate, check them out - Fi D from Buckinghamshire
Submitted: 20/04/2011 21:14:29
![]()
Owned this car since it was 33 months old and have done 64K in it and it now has 84K on the clock. Apart from consumables it has had a new oxygen sensor and windscreen wiper mechanism fitted. This is a very reliable car with good mpg (av. 52,5). A good British built car. If we had kept the Rover factory going we could have had totally good British cars.
Submitted: 19/04/2011 08:48:59
![]()
I have had my Pixo for 10 months, had an engine mounting bracket replacement in Oct 2010, rear wash fault (leaking into footwell) in December 2010. Low and behold had to go to the dealer today as engine mounting bracket fault once again. We always bought Nissan before but I must say I am looking at buying a citreon from now on.
Responses to this review
We have had our Pixo now for about 18 months. It’s had the wet foot problem and the engine mounting problem. The washer pipe was easy to repair and has not failed again. The engine mounting is another matter. Both the Suzuki and Nissan dealers who are supplying what is in effect the same vehicle are changing engine mountings in the hope rather than the certainty that it will cure the problem. Some Suzuki Altos have had four mountings changed with no cure if you check out the Suzuki4u website you will see what I mean. My second mounting rattles occasionally but don’t see the point in changing it until Nissan UK can guarantee a cure. What I would do is log your complaint with Nissan and get an incident number so you will go on the faults database - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Just had my second engine mounting bracket replaced today. I’ve contacted Nissan direct. I reported the problem to them, who in turn contacted the local dealership. Let’s hope this repair works this time. As a goodwill gesture, the local dealership have agreed to give me a discounted service on my car - Pauline Gibson from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 19/04/2011 08:47:27
![]()
Love the Qashqai.
Submitted: 15/04/2011 08:37:44
![]()
I bought my Nissan Pathfinder Aventura in 2007 from new. I have owned several 4 x 4s, from a Range Rover / Land Rover 90, Mitsubishi Shogun, and the Pathfinder has been very reliable, have had no problems with the vehicle, the downside is the fuel consumption, with the ever increasing price on diesel, I average around 26. I have found that the Nissan Dealers are only interested in a sale and the after care is poor, this was testament when we had a paint problem on the boot around the chrome fitting, which started to rust after just 1 year. Its been very good in the snow, had no problems with clutch and gear box and tows very well. I have had the car for 4 years and won’t be looking to change just yet.
Submitted: 13/04/2011 16:54:59
![]()
I purchased my 1.5 Nissan Almera new and have 160,000 on the clock and it has never let me down even once. Keep it serviced and well kept and you will be happy. Best car I ever bought.
Responses to this review
I take it it’s the only car you ever bought then? - Stu from Yorkshire
My 1.8SE auto has done 104,000 - not had one problem with it! Well done Nissan! - Colin from London
Submitted: 10/04/2011 21:17:50
![]()
High mileage user, fuel consumption very good always on motorway. Normally about 53mpg sometimes 60mpg if I stick to 60mph. I have done 50000 miles in 1.5 years, guess what? The turbo charger has blown! Just a warning to everyone. Also, the car starts to crawl and it covers the road with thick white smoke. Apart from that no other problems.
Submitted: 07/04/2011 18:38:25
![]()
We purchased a 2003 sve diesel in 2004 with 15k on the clock and the car has been very, very reliable. I will not pay £60 per hour to main dealers and get ripped off, we use a local mechanic who services once a year. Last year it had a new accelerator sensor £700, had to wait 27 days as no parts available in UK or Europe!! This year it needs a new fuel pump, £1,800 new, £900 reconditioned. The car has covered 80,000 miles from new , it has been a great car, but in the last couple of years has started getting expensive. On the whole one of the best cars we have owned, but maybe time to move on. I fancy a VW Touran.
Submitted: 02/04/2011 18:15:20
![]()
I bought a Sept 2009 visia 5 weeks ago. So far quite good although the petrol consumption could be better. Only averaging 35 mpg but thats a lot of in town driving rather than the motorway. I also have gone from an Audi A3 which had far more power and lift. The Visia isn’t the quickest on the motorway but it’s good for around town. The initerior is good quality with the usual electric windows and door mirrors, cd player, mp3 connection, air con etc. So it is good for the basic car. The Audi didn’t have any of that as basic, you had to pay extra. The view from the car is great - extra large door mirrors and a higher driving position makes driving it better, as visibility is better than a standard car. It also is easier for older people and tall people, like myself, to get in and out of. I would definitely buy one again but a bigger engine size and maybe a diesel. I had been looking for a jeep but this is the next best thing, with less costs attached. Overall a very good car, not quite a 5 star but not far off.
Submitted: 30/03/2011 14:38:24
![]()
I have had a Qashqai as a company car the last 8 months and have been very pleased with the car. A 1.6 engine is just big enough for normal driving but it has to be worked hard to get any performance which results in a 35 average MPG. Soft comfortable suspension which leans a lot through corners and lack of speed means it’s not fun to drive. Being a petrol head, I’m getting something fast and sporty soon but the qashqai is a great family car.
Submitted: 30/03/2011 12:39:56
![]()
This is a great car. It’s nifty and good at 80 mph. It’s the best car I have ever driven and it’s also hilarious when beating people off the lights due to the great acceleration.
Submitted: 25/03/2011 09:00:02
![]()
Bought from a Nissan Dealer 6 months old in 2004. Selected for lots of leg room, good mpg (39) and 5-speed box. Joy to drive and excellent in the snow. Has had the injectors replaced under Warranty and the battery, now done 90,000 (2011) Now the down side - The fuel filter body was replaced to fix a leak last year, as it would not start and run properly. Now the Fuel pump has gone (Nissan diagnosis) and will cost £1,850 + VAT + labour (engine-out). Reluctant to pay out such exhorbitant prices. The Suction Valve (the bit actualy faulty) would be a much simpler fix, but the part is not available from Nissan. The fuel pump is not made by them. I think I will have to bite the bullet and hope for the best . Disappointed as very good overall - I see so many other reports above of similar story.
Responses to this review
I had the same problem and was preparing myself for large bill (new or reconditioned fuel pump) but my local Nissan agent informed me that suction cups were now available (only just recently) and quoted £285 for supplying and fitting. Job done, motor now back running. Champion! - Samuel Meteer from Cumberland
I have just been quoted by Nissan Dealer £102 + vat for the suction control valve and £82.10 inc. vat for fitting. I think this is what I need to sort erratic idling - Nigel Thomas from Ceredigion
Submitted: 14/03/2011 19:56:32
![]()
I have had this van 6 weeks (Primastar 1.9 se swb) 100k on the when I paid £2500 and it’s only got 102k on the clock now, on the way home from buying this van it wouldn’t go in 3rd and 4th gear. Took the van to Essex Transmition on Canvey who changed the gear beerings, cost £630 cash so no vat, They done s..t job, tried to catch me out on the clutch, but that was done at 87k. I have had new track rod ends x 2, wishbones x 2, new engine mounts, full service, cambelt and more. Now I have paid £3936 for this and not happy. Glow plug light keeps flashing on when driving, rear brake pad needs replacing. DON’T BUY THIS VAN! I had a Toyota Hiace before this and I only sold it because I was using too much fuel. I will get this work sorted and then my van will be up for sale
Responses to this review
How does the garage that repaired the van bear any resemblence on the van itself? - Mark from Derbyshire
Submitted: 14/03/2011 19:48:20
![]()
Shocked by the high cost of ownership. Heavy on tyre wear, 4 new tyres at £130 each since new and recent MOT/service revealed that the brake calipers/discs and the shock absorbers will require replacing at the next MOT at an overall cost in excess of £2000. This is on a vehicle which has done 38,000 miles since new and has never been used off road. The break calipers required replacement today, (2 weeks following MOT & service) and in my opinion this vehicle is way over rated, noisy and costly to own.
Submitted: 13/03/2011 20:53:53
![]()
My first shock was when I checked the tax disc and found I had to pay £435 as the 05 model is only £270 a year. The alternator had to be replaced 3 months after I bought it. The next thing that went wrong was the engine management light kept coming on every time I pulled my caravan. The garage man said it’s the EGS unit which would cost £600 to replace. Now the cruise control is on the blink. This car is costing me a fortune to keep on the road. I wouldn’t recommend anybody to buy one of these.
Submitted: 13/03/2011 20:34:16
![]()
Had this one from new, April 2006. 40k and no trouble. Engine noisy when cold but regular service keeps the noise down. Loads of extras which somehow makes it pleasant to drive, MPG mid-high 30’s depending on type of journey. Very comfotrable, loads of torque, probably wouldn’t buy another one, but who is that boring they have the same make/model twice?
Submitted: 13/03/2011 20:22:33
![]()
I bought the car new in 2008, had it a month and realised I had made a huge mistake! The car has no refinement, very noisy, generally poor quality, horrendous fuel consumption and overall very poorly finished off for a car costing £31k! I fully agree with other comments about Crystal Nissan of Lincolnshire - a nightmare to deal with!
Submitted: 07/03/2011 10:04:37
![]()
Terrible car, very poor interior finish, just like a man’s washbag! It’s a poor ride, you feel every bump and road noise is excessive. At six years old and at 8,000 miles, there are numerous electrical problems including abs faults, earthing problems and most recently misfiring through the rev range, which is yet to be rectified. Returns 45-50 mpg, pretty high insurance for such a small car. I really can’t emphasise enough the poor quality interior, it’s hard wearing, but would seem more at home on a KIA.
Submitted: 07/03/2011 10:02:56
![]()
I’ve owned this car from new and never had a problem - Oops - a side lamp bulb failed last year. And that’s it. Most brilliant vehicle I’ve ever owned.
Submitted: 05/03/2011 19:02:07
![]()
Truly fantastic! I have driven mine for 9 years, it has done 70,000 miles and my total cost of repairs is ....... £0. This is the most reliable car I have ever known, more reliable than Mercedes, BMW and Audi. I have never had a single problem with this car considering that I purchased it from an Auction for just £6,000 when it was just a year old. Would I recommend it? Of course I would!
Submitted: 04/03/2011 18:31:46
![]()
Test drove one last week and am buying at the weekend. Full leather interior with heated seats, air con and sunroof, CD changer so should be comfy on long journeys. Seemingly very reliable (judging by extensive web research) and capable of pulling heavy loads (which is my main requirement). Only downsides I can see are quite serious body roll in corners (feels like a very high centre of gravity so won’t be high speed cornering!), the insurance group (14D), high tax bracket and poor fuel economy (31 mpg) but maybe its unfair to expect low tax and fuel economy from a 2.7 TD of this age.
Submitted: 04/03/2011 17:34:32
![]()
I bought my Xtrail diesel when it was 3 years old with 47k on the clock. It now has 82k and until recently not much wrong with it so maybe I have been lucky. However, similar to many reviews of late the car has been losing acceleration in 4th gear and above, foot flat to the floor and not much more than 2500 revs. Then it kicks in or I change gear and it’s back to normal and fine on town roads. I have a very good garage near me who could see but not find the problem so sent me to a diesel specialist. Their diagnosis is the fuel injector valves - no surprise. However because it’s not gone to a dealer the guy is reparing the fuel pump for £675 including parts and VAT. It’s still a huge amount of money but not the cost of a new fuel pump, which the dealer would charge for. I am hoping that the car will now last another year or so and I can get some of my money back but having read all this I’d never buy another.
Submitted: 02/03/2011 15:32:28
![]()
The Nissan Qashqai is a brilliant car to have. Because of the jacked-up suspension, it gives you fantastic driving visibility.
Submitted: 28/02/2011 10:52:55
![]()
What can I say? Bought it in Nov 2010, nice to drive even if a tad on the thirsty side. Then at 80,000 it blows up with no warning, nothing. It was my forth Nissan on the trot, but never Nissan again. Nissan even know what the problem is, as does every garage I have spoken to.
Submitted: 27/02/2011 12:16:30
![]()
We bought my wife’s Note 1.6 Auto when it was 6 months old with 5k on the clock. Generally it has not been too bad but now it has just had to have its 2 year (2nd) Service with 19000 on the clock and I wasn’t prepared for what happened. For a few weeks before the service it had been making some very strange noises (intermittently) when started from cold, a sort of scraping/rubbing noise, which went off after about 30 seconds. On booking the service with our local Nissan Dealer (WLMG Slough) I mentioned this noise and several other things that should be done under the warranty. They seemed familiar with this problem and said it would all be done under warranty. I left the car with them and about 2 hours later I got a phone call saying they had found the cause of the noise and that it was some drive train belt (I’m none the wiser either) and it isn’t covered by warranty and it would cost £150 (over and above the cost of the service) to put right.I asked if this was normal for this part to wear out after 2 years and 19K miles and they didn’t really know. I phoned Nissan Customer Services and got told basically the same thing, so I eventually had to cough up. I said "supposing I don’t have this belt replaced, what would be the implication?" I was told that if anything else failed as a result then this wouldn’t be covered by warranty. Not best pleased Nissan seeing as how the service alone was £260. Will keep the car for another year and then dispose of in case any other mysterious non warrant parts fail. Probably won’t be replaced by another Nissan.
Submitted: 25/02/2011 08:13:53
![]()
I bought this X-Trail in September 2006 as a pre registered vehicle Great at first comfortable etc then last year at about 57K Bang!! Dual mass flywheel in pieces out of guarantee and nobody wants to know! Costs over £1100.00!!!! Today 15/2/2011 Turbo goes - another £1000 + labour for repairs This vehicle is not used off road, only for normal motoring and towing a caravan - within suggested limits - twice a year I’ve had more trouble with this vehicle than any other I’ve owned in 50 years of motoring. NEVER, NEVER AGAIN WILL I BUY NISSAN.
Responses to this review
I’m interested in the fact that your turbo failed. Mine went "pop" after 36,000 miles and as you can expect the Nissan dealership who I purchased the vehicle from (and who did all the servicing) did not want to know. In every other respect, I like the vehicle but unless Nissan sort out their dealers, I will look elsewhere next time - Frank Scribe from Surrey
Submitted: 17/02/2011 15:19:46
![]()
I’ve run my 350Z for 2yrs and about 20k miles now. It was bought with a full Nissan service history and about 40k miles on the clock. It’s fast with plenty of useful torque and it sounds great. The cabin manages to provide the normal japanese quality and logical layout whilst providing a bit of retro fun. Its huge fun as a sports car and manages to achieve the character most jap sports cars lack. Apart from routine servicing mine has had zero defects in 7yrs. It’s still on the same clutch. The engine feels as strong as every and the gearbox and steering are tight. Staggering for a 274bhp sports car. Downsides? The boot is a joke and the Nissan ’need to click "open" twice’ to unlock the passenger side are annoying. Max 32mpg min 18mpg. Tyres last about 15k miles under normal use. Hugely recommended, especially for anyone contemplating a TVR or similar.
Submitted: 12/02/2011 21:37:48
![]()
Glad it’s only leased. Not a very good van. I work nationally and do a lot of motorway mileage. The fuel economy is not that good, not very good at pulling away without a huge lag between lifting the clutch and actually moving. When a (mild) cross wind hits it’s frightening, bounces all over the road even when over taken by anything larger. The cabin area storage is lousy and has been over complicated to make it impractical for trades people. Having intermittant trouble with the central locking and alarm resulting in £1000 tools being stolen with no sign of break in (and yes it was locked). Good point - The stereo!
Submitted: 10/02/2011 14:56:57
![]()
I have just sold mine now after 5 years of ownership. It has never let me down and the only parts apart from service ones I have purchased are tyres. It was a comfortable and felt a very safe car with powerful brakes and economical. But the only other two things I liked about it were the 6 speaker stereo and that it had aircon. The performance of the engine was awful the 0-60 mph time seemed like forever,so you had to be very careful when trying to overtake. So if you want a very reliable, comfortable, safe and ever so boring car then this is the one for you.
Submitted: 09/02/2011 21:22:53
![]()
The promise of this car is better than what it actually is. It’s smaller than it looks but I’m ok with that, its ’cheaper’ than it looks but that’s a good thing. Where it falls down is on performance and ergonomics. Even with the reportedly hi tech 188 hp intercooled turbo charged direct injection 4, it struggles and whines to perform. I agree with other critics about the need for manual in the top of the line awd SV. Although I like the look of the car, its beginning to lose its funky charm. Buyer’s remorse... maybe. Its a competent vehicle, just not the stand out I had hoped.
Responses to this review
We brought our Juke last June and have nothing but good things to say about it. One thing that must be said is that you have to give the petrol model a miss and go for diesel, you will not be disappointed. It has the power and the mpg - Mike Farmer from Kent
Submitted: 08/02/2011 21:38:49
![]()
We bought a X Trail 2006 2.2 DCI back in May 2010. At first we were really pleased with the car especially in the snow towards the end of last year. In all the time we had the car there was an annoying rattle behind the dash board especially when the engine was cold and also the glove box fell off a few times. It went back to the garage a few times for them to sort it out. On one occasion they said the problem was one of diesel injectors, which they replaced under warranty. Two weeks ago whilst driving along a dual carriage way overtaking slower traffic doing about 65 to 70. There was slight rattling noise coming from the engine so I pulled over to the hard shoulder and braked heavily whilst doing so, there was a explosion from under the bonnet and before we came to a standstill the car inside and out was engulfed in smoke. Turned the ignition off but was unable to stop the engine at this moment I decided to leave the car. Apparently the garage think one of the diesel injectors failed causing a catastrophic chain of events costing in the region of 6K. Luckily the car was still in warranty.
Submitted: 04/02/2011 22:02:17
![]()
Claims to achieve 39 average miles to the gallon on the computer however it achieves only 30. Otherwise a great car.
Responses to this review
I have the 1.6SE Automatic and I get an average of 39mpg with a mix of town and A-road driving, so it’s right on the mark. You can’t expect more than 30mpg in town with any petrol car and also if you like to hit 90mph on the motorway, don’t expect big fuel economy figures - Mark LV from Berkshire
Submitted: 01/02/2011 20:53:20
![]()
I bought this car in 2005, as my old Vauxhall Cavalier died on me at 130,000. In hindsight I should of driven a harder bargin with the main dealer, but did get some discount after a bit of haggling. Since the original road test I have loved the car, in the 5 and half years I have owned her, I have covered 86,000 miles, starting at 29,000, currently at 115,000. It has been all over Europe with me and has never missed a beat, whether it is fully loaded or it’s just me driving. The seats are comfortable, the ride is a bit harsh, but it’s the sport version, so to be expected. Servicing is every 9,000 miles, which is quite frequent compared to modern day cars, but she is 10 years old now. Only every used the main dealer once for servicing, never again after they charged me £350 for a 9,000 mile service. Use an independant dealer much cheaper and just source the parts yourself, much much cheaper. So over the 5 and a half years what has gone wrong with it. No 1, the fuel sensor failed after 6 months, fixed under warranty (£160). No 2, ABS ring cracked, you have to buy the whole C.V joint as a replacement, (£350) from Nissan or £43 from a independent company. No 3, Rear brake caliper siezed, fully replaced £190, and finally the drive shaft went in 2010. Easy replacement but cost £309 to be fully replaced. So since 2005 I feel it hasn’t done too bad for the amount of miles I cover. I cover 120 miles a day on a round journey between Poole and Portsmouth and it still returns over 37 mpg. Would I buy another one? If Nissan still made them, yes I would.
Responses to this review
I have been driving the Nissan Primera Sports plus since new in 2000. I have done 145,000 and have had no repairs, just regular servicing. I have just had two drive-shafts and stabiliser links fitted in Christchurch Dorset. The total was £343.00, wheel alignment was free. The car still averages 40 miles to the gallon. Wish that Nissan would bring this model out again, or the Bluebird - Tom Turk from France
Submitted: 31/01/2011 21:25:44
![]()
I have just bought the Nissan NV200 and it destroys all the vans I have ever had. It’s superb to drive, has got more gadgets than a lear jet (it’s only a van) and it does not drink diesel but merely sips it. It’s large enough to get a full bathroom suite in and all the tools to fit it. The comfort is worthy of many a high class car. The small size engine is no hindrance to modern driving on British roads, the only drawback is that it seems to bounce a little, but that is a problem I can live with; all the benefits outweigh this one niggle. Well done Nissan!
Submitted: 29/01/2011 19:25:15
![]()
Bought van new in 2007, going well plenty of poke. Recently had prob with injectors, van keeps cutting out, Nissan dealer trying to scr*w us for them, but can buy ourselves new for less than half the price!
Responses to this review
I bought one too, biggest mistake I ever made! It has been in garage a total of 22 times in two years, an absolute disaster! Fuel injectors, water pumps, fuel sensors, glow plugs etc etc etc. Nissan are a nightmare to deal with, the big problem with these vans is sourcing the problem... I need this van for work, have stopped using Nissan garages for repairs because they think your wallet is a bottomless pit! I use my own mechanic, far cheaper... These vans will break your heart. I got into the van this morning and the slave cyclinder for clutch pedal has to be replaced as the pedal stays to floor! - Joe from Northern Ireland
I replaced the master cylinder and slave cylinder, gave the van a full service all over including new brake discs and pads. I thought everything was sorted then I was driving last week and the clutch hit the floor. Left it in garage and turns out that a steel bracket in the pedalbox has broke. The whole dash has to be taken out to replace it. Has to be done by Nissan with the price coming in close to 1,000 Euros. This van is a disaster and is totally unreliable and depressing especially with recession. Going to change it for a Ford, I will never buy Nissan again, these vans are bad for your health. Total spent in three years fixing it: 8,000 Euros. I’ve never had any weight in the van and never had a tow bar. Serviced every 8,000 kilometers and well looked after - Joe from Northern Ireland
Submitted: 28/01/2011 11:19:13
![]()
Having driven the NV200 van for 13,000 miles carrying reasonable loads the two main issues I have difficulty with are: 1). The NV200 reacts alarmingly to cross winds feeling like you are not in control of the steering, the van lurches 300 to 400 mm off your chosen driving line! The NV200 has you gripping the steering wheel tight with white knuckles as you struggle to keep the vehicle on the road while at speeds of less than 50 mph. I have asked the Nissan garage to check out the suspension and steering twice without any reason being found. 2). The servicing costs so far have been way too high with a £250 service twice in the first year! These issues make me want to get rid of the van ASAP
Submitted: 28/01/2011 09:10:48
![]()
Just love it! I used to own a Discovery but the Navara is much, much better. I wanted an Aventura but the right outlaw came along so the deal was done.
Submitted: 26/01/2011 16:56:27
![]()
I bought a 2007 model 1.5 dci Tekna in September last year from a Nissan/Renault dealership and it is the worst motoring mistake I’ve ever made. It had 50,000 miles on the clock and in November, the steering wheel started vibrating really badly from side to side when driving on the dual carriageway and the whole front of the car judders. In turn this has affected the steering and braking quite badly. I took it back to the dealership a few weeks ago and they charged me £400 for new brakes and guess what- the problem is worse than ever! I have to go back at the weekend for them to come out driving with me for them to see the problems for themselves! I can’t stand the car, it is incredibly slow, sluggish and these problems have put me right off Nissans and the dealership. Wouldn’t buy a Nissan again :(
Responses to this review
Why buy a 1.5 dci if your want speed and agility? Surely you road tested before buying:( Sorry to here about juddering but speed and sluggishness? C’mon, a 1.5 wasn’t designed for that! Matt Whiteley from Northumberland
I too am suffering these symptoms, my car is a 57 plate Qashqai Acenta 1.6. It has only covered 18,600 miles from new and will soon be on it’s third set of brake disks and pads (the last carried out under warranty). I have the same worrying vibration and side to side movement of the car under braking. Very unsettling at motorway/dual carriageway speed. Unfortunately, Nissan have shrugged it off to wear and tear, yeah right. Personally, think there is a problem that needs looking into - Fiona Kennedy from Perthshire
Well the problems only got worse, I had to take the car to another Nissan dealership as Hylton did not want to know. Turns out the brakes were staying on ALL THE TIME which accounted for the juddering and slow speed. I had to have a lot of work done to remedy this and thankfully after some battling and many phone calls to Nissan complaints, they paid for all the work. The second Nissan dealership said I should never have been sold the car in that state! I have just done 70,000 in my QQ, and I now need a new alternator and cam belt even though the dealership I bought it from said it had a chain not a cam belt. Still stand by the decision that it was the worst mistake I ever made buying this car! - Rebekah from Gloucestershire
We have a 2009 1.5 dCI Qashqai here in Germany and its marvellous both on and off autobahnen etc. It’s very reliable over 45,000km on the clock and we love it! Fuel consumption over the distance? About an average of 5.3 Liters per 1,000 km which is around 50+mpg which cannot be bad for a smart car of this size! Thank you Sunderland! - Stui Bedford from Germany
Submitted: 20/01/2011 14:55:05
![]()
Had car since brand new, endless problems, noisy engine, masses of exhaust smoke, engine oil leak, air con leak, washer hose burst twice, broken rear heater switch, car has done 14,000 miles and requires another clutch (this will be clutch number three.)
Submitted: 16/01/2011 20:24:47
![]()
Wow, this car’s getting a bit of a kicking isn’t it? I bought mine pre-registered with 300 miles on the clock. My current financial circumstances dicated that I should sell my C Class and buy something sensible, after some shopping around I bought the Pixo, with no regrets. It’s not perfect, I too have had the wet drivers footwell but I pretty quickly worked out that if the rear washer didn’t appear to work I should stop trying to make it. A quick look under the dashboard solved the problem. It’s reasonably well made, it drives well although maybe the steering is a bit on the light side. Yes, the boot is small, it’s a small car, what do you expect? I wish it had a proper glovebox, I’ve ordered one from Suzuki, I’m reassured it’ll be a perfect fit. I was concerned that the plastic may be a different colour but that’s not the case. I’m getting 55mpg and it’s getting better as the miles pass. The engine feels much more free now that I have covered more than 1000 miles, it revs much more willingly so it feels nippier. It’s still on the noisy side until you’re in 5th gear and cruising at 50 or more. It’s not unpleasant, just different. Consider this, I paid £5900 for what was effectivly a brand new car, it’s the cheapest of it’s kind to buy, insure, tax, drive. There are cheaper cars to tax but they’re 1000’s more to buy. After being a Mercedes driver for many years I have no regrets about buying a Pixo. Buy one, buy one, buy one!!!
Responses to this review
55mpg - the car is adverised at doing 74 mpg extra urban, so why is it only doing 55? Mine does between 50 and 55 extra urban, a far cry from what is advertised - Elise from Cambridgeshire
I should also say, further to the comments about a glove box/lack of, I bought one from Suzuki and fitted it myself, I’m not unhappy with it but think about it before you spend the money, it’s fiddly to fit and a bit too flimsy for the job, a couple of tabs broke off meaning that it’s not as secure as it ought to be but I’m pretty sure that with some patience, which I don’t have right now, I can repair it - Shaun Tate from Yorkshire
Further to my previous comments, I had my Pixo for 11 months and 15,000 miles, apart from the previously mentioned foot shower it’s been faultless. I’m just finding the boot a bit small for my current needs but honestly I can’t find anything I want to change it to, I just can’t justify spending the money. Buy a Pixo, I love it! - Shaun Tate from Yorkshire
Submitted: 12/01/2011 21:26:10
![]()
Well where do I begin! The car worked fine up until I took the car in for its first service. Since then the car is starting to fall to bits, but it is not just the car it is the customer care as well. First the problems with the car. 1). Fuel Performance is down to around 37mpg from around 50mpg (Along way from the promise of 57-60mpg for the automatic). I was getting around 330 miles per 30litre tank...now I am getting if I am lucky 240 miles per 30litre tank before the fuel light comes on. 2). Car is struggling to start, and sometimes does not start at all. 3). Weird engine noise has started in the passed 3 months. Sounds like an air gun popping when I come to a stand still with the car in the drive position. 4). Electric window keeps getting stuck whenever it is damp. 5). Finally the paintwork...paid the extra money to have the car covered in guardX...result of this has been poor. Scratches and marks all over the bodywork. Right on to the customer service: The Nissan dealership in Epsom keep telling me the car is working fine. It is my fault somehow! I do the same journey day in day out, but the excuses I have had so far from them are: 1). Its my driving style - That’s funny as I have been driving in the very same car for 6 months and then all of a sudden it goes bad. Have I changed that much then? 2). It’s the weather - Umm, I know that you use a little extra fuel in the winter, but not an extra 70-80 miles worth of fuel per tank. 3). I have been stuck in traffic - Funny as I don’t remember them being in my car on my journeys! The other thing about customer care. Everytime I have taken the car back since, I say will someone please call me when the car is ready to pick up. They have never called me to let me know, which drives me mad as I have to call and then they happen to be on lunch and they say don’t worry someone will call as soon as your car is ready...Like hell they do! Just fed up with this car and the dealership telling me the car is fine and that if anything was wrong it would have shown up on they computer test! What now? I wish I had my old Mercedes back! Worse car I have ever had...avoid!
Responses to this review
How odd, both ex. Merc drivers but with opposite opinions. I’d like my Merc back too but as a cheap to buy, cheap to run, cheap to... well, cheap to everything I am, so far, very happy with my Pixo - Shaun Tate from Yorkshire
I had a Pixo from new for a year, had all the problems that all you guys have had and more, they just keep on coming. Mine too was in the garage, in fact I think they had it more than I did. Eventually the dealer succumbed to my constant complaining (which was called for) and between themselves and Nissan UK they exchanged my Pixo for a Micra N Tec - no extra monies to pay, what a relief. Wish I had stuck with my Micra before. Having said that I did at times enjoy the Pixo, it does what it says on the tin, it’s cheap and don’t we all know it. Don’t give up, keep at them till they give in - Jenny from England
Submitted: 11/01/2011 22:02:29
![]()
I CANNOT STRESS ENOUGH, DO NOT BUY A PIXO!!!! I have had nothing but trouble since I bought it in Aug 2010, like above problems include: Soaked front carpets, car freezing on inside, cuttting out on hills, fuel consumption awful, loud banging from OSF, exhaust rattling around and the engine is so noisy you cannot talk to a passenger!! I have now come to the conclusion that trading it in and losing money on it is the only option!! Made in India and it shows, shoddy inferior workmanship. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, DO NOT BUY ONE!!!!!!
Submitted: 11/01/2011 21:16:02
![]()
Firstly can I say that the poor little Pixo is getting a bit of a raw deal. It has its short comings but what cars don’t? I purchased my Pixo n-Tec last year as an unknown quantity. I needed a new car to take me to and from work as cheaply as possible. I was looking at a Fiat Panda or a Peugeot 107, but the Panda was beyond my means and the 107 I though was too expensive for what you got. The little Pixo is such a cheap new car with so much equipment for the initial outlay especially in n-tec spec. Air Con, Power steering, electric front windows, front fog lights, remote central locking, 4 airbags, ABS, split folding rear seats, CD/MP3 player and a 5 door body, what more do you want for under £8000? The equivelant equiped 107 is nearly £2000 more. Once you have bought the car you get 3 years warranty, you pay group 2 insurance and after the first 12months the road tax is only £20 a year! Yes the plastics inside are a bit cheap, but the little Pixo is only pulled along by a 3 cylinder engine so I would rather get the extra MPG and speed from it being light than have thick heavy plastic to make the car slower and less frugal on fuel. The boot is small, but so is the boot on the 107, C1 and Toyota Aygo, but if you want a bigger boot then buy a bigger car. I have read some reviews concerning rattles and poor build quality. Please remember this is a budget supermini built in India, it’s also 3 cylinder so its not going to idle that smoothly making any loose bits rattle, but I feel the Pixo is well screwed together and any problems can get sorted within the 3 year warranty. The Pixo shares its existence with its sister, the Suzuki Alto, this car is built in India at the the same factory as the Pixo, and shares everything with the Pixo except the front and rear bumper and bonet. On this very website there is not one bad review of the Alto even though its the same car, why is this? Nissan has hit the nail on the head with this car, it’s well equiped, has 5 doors, its nippy round town and quiet even above 60mph and most of all its very cheap to run. All in all the Pixo is a quirky little car that deserves a better review than it keeps getting. If you think the Pixo is not what your after, then feel free to pay a lot more money for its rivals, but be prepare to get a lot less.
Submitted: 07/01/2011 21:39:14
![]()
Brilliant on fuel, Rented one for a week from IOM airport last year. Completed over 500 miles in the week, on small roads and it still returned over 54 mpg. My mpg figure was via a calculator, I didn’t realise it had a computer!! Any neg comments? it did tend to bounce around a little, but the roads we used were often very minor, so the problem probably arose from the roads we used. Would I buy one? certainly, if it’s long enough to get a bike in (I forgot to measure) but I am now considering a purchase.
Submitted: 07/01/2011 21:12:10
![]()
Since I have had this vehicle have faced a number of problems: 1). first of all some sort of wiring loom burned out on it. 2). Then semi auto gear box broke wouldn’t select gear after had that repaired 3). Fear selector again wouldn’t select gear. 4). Window regulator and suspension baring replaced. 5). No electrical power because alternator had gone. 7). Gear box again wouldn’t select gear again after had it repaired with the vehicle been in Nissan Holdcroft for three months they finally repaired it but still it wasn’t right so it had to go in to Renault Holdcroft for the software for the gearbox. Now had it back for about three months and it’s back in Nissan Holdcroft because of the gearbox again, bear in mind this is a 2008 purpose built taxi which came from VOYAGER, which was based in Crewe but now have moved to Sandbach in the Midlands. So one thing’s for sure, I wont be buying anything off them!
Responses to this review
Hi Mohammed. I Know how you feel. I have the same vehicle from Voyager and it has the same gearbox fault as yours. The local dealer has been trying to find a solution since March 2009. They have fitted 3 robotic units but it still didn’t solve the fault. Voyager told me they was a dealer in Widnes who had 6 vehicles with the same problem. I have been told that the fluid that runs the automatic unit is getting contaminated and eventually the system shuts itself down. The dealer in Widnes told me they change the fluid every 4 to 6 weeks and it cuts down on the fault occuring. It isn’t a solution but it does keep you working. I got it back today after having all the software updated and fluid replaced so fingers crossed. If you wish to swap information you can email me at garyswatman[at]yahoo[dot]co[dot]uk and I will tell you anything that can help - Gary Swatman from Yorkshire
I feel for you, Mohammed. I bought my ex voyager Primastar in Dec 2010 with 64,000 on the clock. Now at 111,000, the transmission has failed. It has the tiptronc system (ie. no clutch peddle but a manual clutch and gearbox). My local Nissan have quoted £2,300 just to supply and fit the clutch! Once fitted if it is found that the robotic actuator is faulty then the bill rises to £6,500! I’ve already waited two weeks for the clutch (arriving this Friday hopefully). If the actuator needs ordering that’s another two weeks. Cannot order both parts together as there is a no return policy on electronic components. Once bought, you have to have the part even if it is not required. The only thing about this vehicle that is Nissan is the batch. Never again! - Emmanuel Moschakis from Hampshire
Submitted: 03/01/2011 21:14:05
![]()
Yes mine was great, pulling things out of trouble was just like pulling a babys tooth out. Only did a one off, off roading. I’ve seen landrovers and Rangerovers get stuck just like any other 4x4, they all can get into difficulties but these machine will out run a discovery any time with out over heating.
Submitted: 30/12/2010 22:04:09
![]()
This car looked great, handled well and had some pretty good torque (when it was roadworthy), but was useless on fuel economy, returning at best 28 mpg on a long run and an average of 24mpg combined. I bought the vehicle directly from Nissan Aldershot when it was 1 year old with 9k on the clock. After just a couple of thousand miles I had to have a new dual mass flywheel and clutch fitted, pedal assembly and the interior 4x4 switch. After they did this and downloaded new software to the ecu the fuel economy went down to an average of 20 mpg! Nissan weren’t interested in this when I told them about it. Not only that, but the new clutch set up had an obvious fault (juddering in first and second gear) Again Nissan weren’t interested and tried to blame me on my driving style at first, but then after much persistence told me that it was a characteristic of the dual mass flywheel installation??!!!!! Why anyone would want to own or drive a car with a problem like this that Nissan say is normal is beyond me! West way Nissan were terrible, the after sales was a joke. I gave up counting the amount of times I had taken the car into them to sort this and all the other problems out that I had with this car which seemed like most of the time I owned it and when you are paying £400 a year in road tax you want to be driving it on the road and not having it sat in Nissan’s workshops while their so called master tech ponders over what to do with it!! Suffice to say I sold the pathfinder and although I accept that you can have problems even with a new car, its because of the poor customer service from West way Aldershot that I will never buy another Nissan again...
Submitted: 29/12/2010 20:51:31
![]()
Great on diesel, nice ride and loads space in back. We’re a courier firm going all over uk and this van is second to none, ace van.
Submitted: 27/12/2010 22:01:53
![]()
I am a fan of this car, it does do an awful lot, however, I recently discovered another fault that they don’t tell you about. I took the car in to the dealer as it was not running correctly at either idle or in top gear. Turns out the head gasket had blown as there was only 1/3 the coolant there should have been (should have checked after a local non-Nissan service ...taking that on the chin, not my whinge) BUT the temperature gauge was still registering normal, i.e. enough coolant to keep the gauge normal but not enough to stop the head gasket blowing! That then cracked the head which added another £800 to a £2000 bill! Having to take it back in tomorrow as 4WD keeps malfunctioning - not good in 6 inches of snow. Love the car but not sure if would buy another one after this experience ...
Submitted: 23/12/2010 22:41:32
![]()
I like the space and large boot. It’s not very comfortable but it’s not too bad either. This model would have been good if it hadn’t had the timing chain defect. This problem seems to be very common and very costly. The first time it cost me £500 in my local garage, now I’ve got the same problem and Nissan are quoting me £1500-£1700 to fix their own problem. I wouldn’t recommend this model to anyone.
Responses to this review
You’re exaggerating - Adam from Lincolnshire
Complete and utter drama queen. No need for it - Minnie Mills from County Tyrone
Submitted: 20/12/2010 21:51:34
![]()
Had the Note for 2 and a half years, bought at 6 months and 4,000 miles old. The car has now done 45,000 miles and is about to go out of warranty. So far only 2 minor problems sorted out under warraty in about an hour each (new sunvisor as the other one was loose and 2 new alloys due to minor corrosion). Main gripe is the expensive tyres with no cheap alternatives. Mine last about 15,000 miles, my previous cars could get at least double that. The Nissan dealer says that I am lucky, many people only manage just over 10,000! Like it for the vast space for the smallish size. I carry elderly passengers much of the time and they can easily get in the back as well as the front. The diesel is great, not too noisy and I manage about 62mpg according to the onboard computer. Even if it is over-optimistic by 10% I would consider the high fifties to be good! I will only say that it is a brilliant car when I have done around 80,000 trouble-free miles, but so far the signs are good.
Responses to this review
I would like to challenge the tyre wear issue. I have a 1.5dci Acenta (Tecna to you in the UK). I have covered 148,000km on six tyres. I spoke to the Nissan dealer here in Spain about this tyre ’wear’ issue and he wasn’t aware of any problem of this nature with the Note. The Note and Qashqai are their best sellers but to be fair, they’re their only sellers - David Cory from Spain
Submitted: 15/12/2010 19:24:08
![]()
We got this car this October and I can say is it is a cracking car. Fuel hovers around 39 - 41 MPG and thats all short runs around town and 20mile by pass trips so its good on fuel, the 1.6 is worth having as its got good turn of speed and pulling up the hills is no problem. Loads of leg room front and back and adjusting the back seat gives you good boot space. very comfortable Has a "stiff" ride but does not feel that bad, the Hyundai i20 has the same ride as I have tried one. SVE kit has good gadgets auto wipers and lights, and the wing mirrors are nice and big. Only small beef is it could do with an instant clear windscreen feature as it takes a while to clear but can put up with that. Well built and good quality inside. As others here have said lots of storage places. Only other niggle is that the tyre choice is very limited and expensive choices you cannot get a budget tyre for this car. It looks awkward on the road but when you are inside its very stylish and sporty performance...BUY ONE!
Submitted: 13/12/2010 07:53:52
![]()
Well my vehicle is up for replacement and it’s a 56 Navara Aventura Auto. I have clocked 190k in this beast and apart for some issues with the switches on the 4WD, its been fantastic. I get 56k out of a set of wranglers the engine has never let me down and I get a constant 31MPG and although lately the UJ’s have give up and the 2 wheel bearings have gone (what do you expect with 190k on the clock). I tow a caravan and although its not the best tow car in the world and the gearbox thinks its towing a 30 ton load at 60mph it does the job at 20mpg doing 70mph. What people need to accept is the Navara is not a car or a 4x4, its a truck with a great spec, its not a soft ride or a nice quiet drive, its a truck, built to work with a load of extras and a tax saving. Personally I find it a comfortable practical vehicle and I have just ordered my new Tekna and it comes this week. People ask me about the Navara and all I say is it’s not a car it’s a truck, if you want a soft ride get a Merc and complain about the tax bill.
Submitted: 11/12/2010 22:12:32
![]()
My Nissan Primastar is actually a taxi, made by a company called "Voyager". Problems as follows; new alternator (warranty), new clutch (65k), track rods x 2, inner track rods x 2 & ball joint x 2. I will have to replace the steering rack soon but that’s due to the pot holes. I currently have 90k on the bus and its doing good, but I doubt I would buy one again as I always like to try other motors.
Submitted: 10/12/2010 09:25:03
![]()
I bought a 2008 model second hand with 25,000 on the clock last week. We live a hilly mile off road, have 18 inches of snow, and so far it has behaved impeccably. On the roads, despite the weather, over 100 miles it has performed in excess of manufacturers mpg figures. Not achieving figures is usually a driving error, rather than manufacturers error. I have always driven to the manufacturers numbers, except in cars over 6 years old or so where things are wearing out. Loads of room - good visibility. nice touch to be able to see the headlights over the bonnet to assist with parking etc. Big dog happy in the back, even with boxes of shopping. Only a week in, so not the most balanced review, but it has been a tough first week for any car. One happy owner.
Submitted: 07/12/2010 19:12:15
![]()
I pray that anyone reading this, who is thinking about buying this car take a strong warning and look else where (ie: buy a different car). I also hope that Nissan reads this and learns from it’s customer. I bought this car for a whopping 8/9k (what I sad fool I am) This is an extremely poorly built car. The windshield freezes up in winter on the INSIDE. I’m just talking about a small amount of ice on the inside (that a rag will wipe away), but a mass of thick ice that can only be cleared with de-icer chemical (imagine that on the interior and dash) or by using a plastic scrapper (again, leaving the dash covered in snow-like powder). It takes me on average 30 to 35 minutes before being able to drive off for any journey. It is VERY clear that the quality windscreen and surrounding door ceils are very poor. On whole the car is badly insulated. Various lights including the indicators and reversing lights stop for periods of time and upon investigation; this looks to be a case of water fuseing out the lights due to the poor quality wires and poor quaility housing used. On the rear light clusters; naked wires can be seen at the point of where the wire hits the bulb connector holders (so bear wires and condensation do not go together well). Nissan are useless in resolving this and seem only bothered in offering me another "health support check" - which is their excuse for trying to make me feel better and look over the car. After the health check; all is ok for about 5 weeks - until things work there way loose again through the daily driving. The roads in the UK just shake this car to bits. I’ve had SIX health visits. Crazy !! As for the foot shower- yes ! several times. I am now also get crackling and knocking noises from various parts of the car which are starting to concern me. Avoid this car. For the money you can easily buy something else brand new, which is of far better build. Mazda, Kia, Toyota, etc, etc.. I feel stupid for buying this car !!! What must I have been thinking?? Nissan’s false promises! AVOID !!!!!!
Responses to this review
Man! Too late! I bought this car and took it to the dealer after having made complaint within seven days of purchase and found faults. Noise from wheel, rust, steering/wheel not tracking properly... The dealer has my car and so far has not told me what they intend to do. It’s nearly two weeks now. I have asked for my money back and wish I had seen the comments by the good people here. I for one am not happy with Nissan or their dealer. Can anyone tell me where I stand legally and under Nissan’s sale contract? Firoz Mulji from England
Same issue for me... my car has been in AGAIN folks to Nissan... again again again... you kinda get the idea. Today it went in for two faults 1) being the reversing light failure 2) the inside of the car being absolutely soaked through as the pipe that supplies the back screen washer has burst under pressure and emptied the contents of the screen washer bottle INSIDE the car all over the carpet - ie: water is everywhere. Nissan today told me that they have to remove everything from the car (ie: seats, carpet, trim) to replace the supply pipe from the front of the car to the rear of the car (so a fairly messy job). This is now our SEVENTH return for repair work in relation to the screen washer unit. Nissan do not want to take responsibility to owners for this and in my opinion are useless. Aviod Nissan! Buy something else!!! The next time I take the car back... it will be at 40 mph through the showroom window!! - Rob from Lancashire
Our Pixo is in the dealership in pieces, literally. After six failed attempts to fix a leak at the second dealership, we took the car to a third dealer. This dealer seems somewhat better and have water tested the car to discover that the windscreen seal is defective and as a result, the car has been stripped down inside to dry out the soaked electrics, replace the carpet which is under 1 inch of rain water. We will be without the car for a week at least. To make the matter worse, we tried to sell the car to another car manufacturer, but upon completion of a HPI report on our car, they discovered that finance was showing on the car (but we didn’t take finance out on the car as we paid cash to a main dealer) - now we have the a hassle of clearing this finance off the car, whatever it is. Avoid, avoid, avoid - Rob from Lancashire
Submitted: 05/12/2010 13:13:17
![]()
my Micra is the best car I have ever had. I have had many cars over the past 30 years, but the most reliable is the Micra, it’s 10 years old and never broken down. Anything made in Japan is good!
Submitted: 05/12/2010 12:14:58
![]()
Driving the Navara tires me out. I had an old Merc E-Class before this lump and felt refreshed as it was so smooth. This thing hops and judders over every bump completely tiring out the driver as if he has run a marathon. Wouldn’t get another but I wanted to get the tax saving through the company as it’s classed as a commercial.
Responses to this review
Agree with you, but if you put in a set of helper springs between the leaf spring and chassie it will change the ride. Cost in Ireland about 80 euros plus. Cheers - Paddy Rose from Ireland
Submitted: 01/12/2010 21:28:05
![]()
My Tekna was 2 weeks old when it had a fuel leak TWICE. Nissan’s response was call the RAC!!!! It`s on its 3rd set of shockers. The boot/tailgate is rattling now so it’s going back again. The door sensor sometimes doesn’t work. Its had the recall for the steering nut. The bluetooth works when it feels like it. The selling salesman lied about the servicing costs. The After sales care is 5th rate. The attitude is poor. I have several customers with Quashqai’s who all have complaints about their car. I don’t feel that the car was NEW. I have never felt so dissappointed with any car I`ve had more than this one! Tip for anyone out there DON’T BUY ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a let down. THIS CAR IS STILL ONLY 2 & HALF YEAR`s OLD & 18,000 ON THE CLOCK.
Submitted: 28/11/2010 21:04:10
![]()
I got my first 350z GT yesterday and I am in love already. It feels great, looks great and sounds great. I can’t see myself ever turning back. It’s a delight to drive and is a real head turner. If you’ve not got one then your missing out on a real treat.
Submitted: 23/11/2010 10:43:00
![]()
My Navara has been a total disaster. It is most definitely not a working vehicle. Despite the fact that it looks good on paper it is mechanically unreliable and totaly unsuitable for towing anything larger than a small trailer loaded with feathers. It’s history does not read well: 40k miles new clutch (under warranty after a lot of arguing!) 42 k new rear wheel bearings (£600 each since you have to buy the complete half shaft), 45k new break servo, 60k new turbo, 63k new turbo, 63.5k another new turbo ...and finally on route to trade in for new car....yes you guessed it ...another new turbo...none of the turbo’s covered under warranty and Nissan refuse to accept that there is a problem with the turbo. Never, ever buy one of these unless all you want to do is take the kids to school in it.
Responses to this review
I have a 2003 Navara. It tows a 27ft 5th wheeler no problem. I fitted a power chip 3 inch exhaust and snorkel car and van weight 5.6 ton - Doug Wood from Australia
Submitted: 23/11/2010 10:25:50
![]()
I have a Nissan Terrano II, year of manufacture 2001, from Spain. I must emphasize it is a great car no regrets investing in this power machine! I call it the Bundu basher! I have tried it off road, great off road capabilities!! The cotton soils of Maasai Mara, the sands of North Eastern Province and the red soils of Embu and Meru! Parts however are expensive and unavailable in Kenya. Someone do something. Secondly the chasis is weak, my Bundu basher was an accident salvage! The left side chasis suffered a bend, which I must say was not well straightened! The machine is doing well with this.
Submitted: 22/11/2010 20:53:05
![]()
Got the car nearly 5 years ago, the intercooler was changed 3 times in the first year under warranty then the injectors were replaced under warranty. I’ve done 50k and I’m now afraid to overtake other cars as I try to pass and speed up the power drops and I have to change to another gear to regain power. Apart from these faults the car drives great, I’m looking to change cars and thought about another X-Trail, but after reading these reports I think not.
Responses to this review
I had the same problem with my X-Trail. I fitted a new fuel filter - problem sorted. It would not suprise me if your fuel pump problems are indeed the filter - Ronnie Firth from Yorkshire
I think clutch and clutch disk (mechanical device which transmits power from the engine to the gears (in a vehicle)) should be replaced - Ismail Hakki Atac from Turkey
Submitted: 16/11/2010 20:30:34
![]()
Bought mine just before the fuel went through the roof. Had an Astra estate for 9.5 years with next to no trouble and 50 to the gallon. Xtrail is a lovely ride, all the toys but 30 m.p.g was a bit of a pill. 18 months in and had a new heater blower motor. Dealer said £300 plus labour and vat. 1st choice car spares said £80 plus £40 to have it fitted. :-). Now... after 2.5 years I’m facing a fuel pump or injectors. On top of redundancy its all I need. Lovely motor though. Pity they don’t last like Astras. I miss my Astra. :-(
Submitted: 13/11/2010 21:28:57
![]()
Before I bought my Navara I tested everything out there and nothing came close - The Hilux looks a little better but does not even come close on the road, The L200 comes close on the road but be honest it looks like a pig! I’ve used it to pull a 28ft Caravan from one end of the country to the other, to drive the family down to the South of France and also to carry pallets around for work,its comfortable,fast and big enough to take all the junk associated with a wife and young family. It has been thrashed and abused from day one,it uses no oil between services,the tyres last 25 - 30k a set and I get them locally for £80 each. The only significant problem in 3.5yrs was the fuel pump packed up - replaced under warranty no issues. I am currently looking to update and I have to say it will take something special to turn me away from another Navara.
Responses to this review
Yes, just replace the battery. If you don’t press any buttons when changing, you should be fine. If you do then you might need to re-synchronise the pad with the car - Stuart McMillan from Ayrshire
Submitted: 04/11/2010 20:37:36
![]()
Where do I start? I have had mine 2 months, very clean van looks great, comfortable. I purchased the van as the gearbox had been replaced with a recon unit, a brand new turbo fitted and had a new clutch, as these costly jobs already done I thought I was getting a good buy. Wrong, GLOW PLUGS & RELAY/ABS PUMP/ALTERNATER/REAR WHEEL BEARING/OIL LEAK. All this in 2 months, garage that does repairs just had Vivaro 2004 in, engine failure due to the water pump seizing. These vans really are no good, apart from looks and interior, don’t know why there are thousands on the road. Some people say they are fast, well I don’t know what they mean by fast but a 1.9 d with 100 bhp pulling a big van in my opinion is not. My girlfreinds ford ka feels a lot faster. DON’T BUY ONE!
Responses to this review
How did they find what the oil leak was... I have one and no one knows where the oil is coming from! Thanks - Matt from England
Submitted: 30/10/2010 21:51:19
![]()
I basically like the car, finding it lovely to drive, useful equipment & very comfortable. However it needed the front discs & pads replacing when 2 years old (10k miles) & now needs them replacing again after another year and 4k miles ! although dealer / Nissan has agreed to replace them FOC as a "goodwill gesture". It doesn’t inspire confidence.
Submitted: 28/10/2010 18:07:40
![]()
Excellent Van. Bought it from new in April 2005 originally for courier work and put 130,000 miles on it in it’s first two years, had no problems with it at all. Now over 5 years and clocking in at 168,000 miles, it still has never let me down. Will keep it ’til it dies, then promptly buy another.
Responses to this review
I’m a mechanic and am constantly working on these vans together with the Vivaro and Trafic. They are all the same van and all have the same problems. I’ve never heard of one doing over 100k on the same gearbox, 70-80k max. Together with constant electrical problems, glowplug issues, maf sensor and almost every other sensor, I’ve come to the conclusion that apart from the gearbox, these vans are all fitted with recycled wire in the loom. This Wire fails constantly and creates the mess which is reported here. The one thing I will say though is the turbo units never seem to fail, maybe it’s the fact the vans are limited to 3,800 revs and give the units an easier life. Do not buy these vans, it’s not a pleasant relationship, ever, in my experience - Mark Dodds from England
Submitted: 28/10/2010 17:57:25
![]()
We have run Cabstars for 25 Years and have had good reliability in the past but the last two models have been nothing like the old ones. In fact nothing like Nissans. There was a dangerous fault with the tyres deflating on motorways which the dealer couldn’t find the cause of. We found it- faulty valves. The cab protector/ladder bar cracked right through from vibration metal fatigue. There was evidence of rust from new which the dealer failed to put right but he did take lots of photos which meant we were without it on two days. Now after only 60,000 miles and just outside the waranty, the timing chain had gone so sloppy it has jumped a tooth and damaged the sprockets etc. What is worse is Nissan want £430 for the chain alone! and nearly another £400 for the sprocket, and tensioner. This is gross overcharging for parts.
Submitted: 19/10/2010 21:36:27
![]()
Hi all, I bought a nissan pixo for my mum as a present, she’s never had a new in over 45 years of driving so I thought it would be a fabulous present to give her, I bought it brand spanking new from the dealer with lots of nice little extras... Electric windows, power steering etc. so the top price. We had a rattle with it from the second day after purchase, the rattle being worse from a cold start, this gradually got more noticeable as time has gone on, we have now been back and to on 4 occasions this is only the second month we have had it. It has had an exhaust replaced, a plastic wheel arch fixed that was loose and now it has gone in to have a its engine mount fixed. All I have been told are nothing to worry about... funny then that I have lost confidence in the car, lost confidence in Nissan, the present for my mum has basically been ruined and the shine of that has been taken away. I fear that the quality of Nissan is no longer what it used to be after the chief executive went through his cost cutting exercise "Le cost killer" indeed, also "Le quality killer". I will be writing to him to thank him.
Responses to this review
Hi Polly, I am shocked that you have had such a bad time with your Pixo, what has been the outcome with the car? You are correct with the quality not being what you would expect from Nissan as the car is a rebadged Suzuki Alto that’s actually built in India. I gather Nissan have been frantically trying to sort out the rattle, did they succeed? I tried a few cars before I came across the Pixo. I was interested in a Peugeot 107, but to get one in a 5 door body with everything the Pixo n-tec has was going to cost me £3000 pounds more. The 107 is no more refined than the Pixo and inside, there is just too much painted metal on show. So I think that the Pixo is a bargain! I hope your Mum has started to enjoy her car at last and any worries about it have been sorted - W Goldsmith from Herefordshire
Submitted: 12/10/2010 19:20:39
![]()
The only vehicle I would change it for is the new Navara v9x.
Submitted: 03/10/2010 21:48:44
![]()
Purchased new November 2008 and has covered 59000 miles. Dealer serviced at recommend mileage. Excellent vehicle in my opinion but was not impressed with the suppling dealer servicing and changed dealers who are excellent. Front tyre wear is disappointing 20k but rear tyres 50k. Fuel consumption according to computer 39-42 mpg. Have found it does about 3miles more per gallon on Shell Diesel. Have not had to replenish oil between services. Have usually always driven quite long distance so engine always obtains optimum heat. I have always allowed engine to idle for about 30-45 seconds to allow turbo to cool down before switching engine off. Hope this proves effective. Previously had Audi diesels driven in the same way A4 240k no problems serviced every 10k. A6 200k no problems.
Submitted: 29/09/2010 21:05:35
![]()
Got to agree with the others. Got mine 2nd hand, 60K Kms. Leather, electric, sunroof etc, etc. Was concerned with the CVT transmission, but now I’m not. Had 2 other pathfinders. Very smooth, fast for the overtaking. Tows, carries my dogs, tents, easily. On the overtake, just pop it into sports mode - whoosh. A lot of car for the money. I’m running about 20mpg. Dont be put off, and take a look.
Submitted: 27/09/2010 21:50:40
![]()
I ran a Discovery 3 for three years before replacing it with a new Pathfinder 18 months ago and I have regretted it ever since. The Discovery gave me 3 years trouble free motoring and was replaced on cost grounds but the extra money spent would have been worth it. I consider my Pathfinder to have a dangerous fault which the dealers and Nissan refuse to acknowledge because the system has not "logged" it. And in a catch 22 situation if they have no record of a fault they will not investigate it, therefore new faults are not investigated as there is no previous record of them. The fault I have with my Pathfinder is that the auto box changes down into 3rd at specific speeds on declines, the most alarming example being at about 65mph when it suddenly downshifts to 3rd when you feather the throttle or just touch the brake to regulate the speed. The effect is a violently over revving engine and the only way to stop it is to accelerate and get the box to change up, great when you are going down a hill! It won’t do it at 60 or 70 or if the hill is to shallow or steep but basically it is dangerous especially on bends. Nissan will not investigate it. Nissan also say the car should return 23 - 38mpg, average 33 which is why I bought it. Mine does 21 but they say they don’t expect it to do anymore and it is within spec, they have no integrity or customer care and I am counting the days to dropping it. The Sat Nav is also rubbish.
Submitted: 20/09/2010 09:11:43
![]()
Wonderful car, excellent handling, sounds like nothing else on earth. I have had 4 years of trouble free motoring, replace back tyres about 15K if you are relatively easy on the right foot, £300 @ least. Not expensive to service and not for families but wonderfully comfortable. Sadly now sold to be replaced by a 4X4, the only vehicle I have owned that I am truly sad to part with in nearly 40 years driving.
Submitted: 16/09/2010 13:55:12
![]()
I decided to downsize my Vectra for a smaller car. The first time I saw the micra I wasn’t impressed. Two door, small boot, high outline. Maybe underpowered. Decided to take a chance & bought one. Saved £200 right away on tax and insurance. Took the car for a run round Snowdonia, set the sat-nav and away we went. What a shock, thought I was driving a sports car compared with the Vectra. Fast cornering, perfect steering & roadholding, nippy liveley engine. Reached destinations by shortest routes. No one overtook me and I stayed within speed limits. This car is no ladies car, you need all your driving skills and if you are not 100% alert in can give you white knuckles. I am 73 years old and this car is the best that I have ever driven. In my opinion the car will save you money and give performance from day one.
Submitted: 12/09/2010 21:46:18
![]()
Hi, I bought this car for my wife in April 2008. No problems, easy to drive, good visibility and returns about 50 mpg. Looks good in solid red and came with roof and side spoilers, bluetooth, steering wheel audio and telephone controls and much more. We have had 6 Micra’s over the last twenty years or so and have never had a significant problem, my daughter’s 9 year old 90,000mile S model still had the original exhaust and battery, and has never failed an MOT. My only advice would be to ensure that the engine oil is changed regularly (at least every 9000 miles or yearly) with good quality lubricant which should prevent timing chain problems. What are we going to do now they have stopped making the Micra in the UK?
Submitted: 06/09/2010 15:38:19
![]()
Like a lot of other reviewers, the fuel pump went on my 2005 X-Trail - out of warranty but only 37k on the clock. Nissan were helpful but it took at least 3 weeks to get the pump reconditioned at a cost of £1,600. I bought this car because I thought that it would offer me boring Japanese reliability. Apparently not. Now I am just waiting for the turbo to go ... Apart from that, it’s a good car!
Responses to this review
Having same problem, told by Nissan garage need new fuel pump, 1300 pounds, luckily we have an excellent mechanic in the family who within 2 hours diagnosed wasn’t fuel pump just fuel regulator at cost of 200 pounds. car now fixed and working fabulous - Deborah Robertson from England
Submitted: 04/09/2010 22:00:34
![]()
Don’t buy one! Renault / Nissan combined! A recipe for total disaster.
Submitted: 02/09/2010 15:07:51
![]()
Hi, just bought the Nissan Pathfinder 2006, pick up tomorrow evening. I have read the reviews and am a little optimistic. We took it for a test drive etc, and really do like the car, it’s in very good condition and we got 2 years warranty with it for peace of mind. I like the toys in it and obviously the DVD for the kids so all I can say is I will update, maybe in a few months time to let you know how its going, so fingers crossed!!! Obviously my rating doesn’t justify as yet.
Responses to this review
Hi there. I am going to lookat a PF tomorrow and was wondering what your first impressions are. Thanks in advance - Marc from Blaenau Gwent
Submitted: 01/09/2010 20:44:33
![]()
An excellent reliable and comfortable vehicle, well able to take people long and short distances. My vehicle has stood up to a lot of hard work for five years with the absolute minimum of fuss and expense.Reminiscent of the Morris Minors of times gone by, all mechanical parts last for ever, and the paint work still glows. Other cars have tried to displace it but I cannot find anything else that, for its age, can beat it. I have always let them go and gone back to the Micra.
Submitted: 31/08/2010 14:24:46
![]()
Had it about a year now, does everything I want and no problems yet. Only complaint is take a map with you as the Sat Nav does try to lead you astray sometimes! Took out the middle seat as I only needed 6, and this allows kids with longer legs to sit comfortably in the back and get in and out without having to tip the middle seats which have car seats fitted on them. Fuel consumption about 26-27mpg.
Submitted: 30/08/2010 22:03:32
![]()
I was reluctant to give up my super reliable Nissan Micra, but needed more space for transporting teenagers and family holidays. The Note does the job, loads of room and very comfortable cabin space with all the Acenta extras. Drives really well and have had no problems at all. I’m getting 50 mpg! Cannot fault it. Desira (Norwich) were particularly helpful; I test drove numerous times before making up my mind and once I decided they found the car for me at a good price.
Submitted: 27/08/2010 21:44:19
![]()
Great car so far only had the car two weeks and we are happy with the drive, I hope Nisson have sorted out their problems.
Submitted: 25/08/2010 00:32:10
![]()
I got my new Nissan Navara last Aug 28 2009. Just a few days after purchased, I had experienced malfunctioning of the unit, first incident engine suddenly stopped while I was driving home. A week after the first incident warning lights appeard on the panel. I also report that the gas pedal is sometimes sensitive and it emits excesive smoke. July 15 2010 I almost collided (the engine suddenly stopped while in the middle of overtaking) according to the mechanic it’s the fuel injection pump. The parts not available. The latest and worst incident that occured was July 18,2010, Sunday morning to visit our shop and stay there so that Monday morning I could go back early in CASA for the scheduled replacement of the injection pump. The car went wild and went out of control and collided with a L300pick-up,...I bought a new vehicle to spare me of mechanical problems, this company has already given me much trouble. What I got was a defective product which almost cost me my life and put other people’s lives in danger. I ask the company to replace but up ’til now no response. so DONT BUY THIS.
Submitted: 24/08/2010 23:50:25
![]()
I have just bought a Primastar 2003 is the year with 78,000 miles on the clock. I seem to be having problems getting it into gear when it’s cold but when it warms up it goes in OK. I went to a Nissan dealer and I explained the problem and he said that the wrong gear box oil is probably in it, that it is too thick and that is why, when it warms up, the gears will go in easier.
Responses to this review
Did the change of the gearbox oil resolve your problems getting it into first and reverse? Or was it a gearbox fault? Mine is in the garage now and my mate already changed the gearbox oil for the right stuff that Nissan use and he is saying the gearbox oil is wrong. Mainly because he doesn’t want to drop the gearbox out - Gary from Staffordshire
Hi mate. I have the same problem, the van is OK in the warm weather but in the cold weather I have to leave the van run for half an hour until the van gets warm and then I can select the gears! Martin Knight from Neath Port Talbot
Submitted: 19/08/2010 14:29:18
![]()
I got a second-hand Qashqai (UK) with 28k on the clock and up until now it has driven superbly. The only minor problem is that I’m hearing a squeak when I fully turn the steering wheel apparently it’s coming from the inside, somthing like plastic to plastic? Any help?
Responses to this review
I was having the same problem with my Qashqai. When I was doing a 3 point turn in slow speed, the steering wheel would squeak. Best way to describe it was like a dog crying. One garage said that it was the engine mounts which had worn. THis was fixed but the problem was still there. They replaced the brake discs and pads, and hey presto - problem solved. I didn’t think that the brakes would affect the steering wheel, but it did. Otherwise great car - Anthony Stavrinides from England
Hi Joseph, I am very interested in buying a Nissan Qashqai. How did you find your car for Malta trafiic? Is it comfortable? I am a bit confused about whether to buy a diesel 1.5 or petrol 1.6. Any suggestions? Thanks - Gordon Caruana from Malta
Submitted: 16/08/2010 08:58:04
![]()
Well, I did say tempt fate... I went on holiday in June, came back to £650 bill for replacement parts as van was losing power again so - wait for it - all the parts that where replaced last time done again but hang on - they should be covered by 12 month parts warranty. Oh dear, 12 months and 2 weeks - no can do says Arnold Clark but is it not a bit odd all same parts that went last time all go at same time again. "But you never made us aware that our Glasgow branch did this previously Mr Carenduff" said the service manager. Wait a minute, W was on holiday my son, desperately needed to keep van on road to work and surely when you put vehicle details on the computer all work undertaken by the Arnold Clark Group would show? Well, it did at every warranty claim remember? This is the same van that has been in Arnold’s work shop more than any other. In fact, it would have probably been cheaper hiring 2 vans! I would, if it wasn’t for the fact I would probaly get charged for that too. "No sorry Mr Carenduff, our computer’s an old one, it’s not linked to the rest, so we did not know about the van’s history of all these parts being already done, sorry - but I will sort something out at next service, OK? A card drops through door to remind me of MOT and service required - oh good I will take manager up on that sort of deal. The van goes in for MOT and sevice - new bill £750: discs pads, handbrake cable... no sorry 2 handbrake cables, ball joint, suspension arm, abs sensor, no sorry 2 abs sensors and sorry 4 sets of pads - wait a minute discs and pads were done less than a year ago. "Do you have your receipt sir?" I will have somewhere but it won’t be a problem. I paid with mastercard - just put card details and my vehicle data in and presto... "Sorry sir, no can do, old computer" syndrome again. Tell me, how can they do a service and MOT for £90 pounds but charge me £169 for first service at 1800 miles. By the way, whenever I by a spare for my Primastar it is in a Renault box. I’ve been told by service manager that genuine Nissan parts need to be used or it’s a problem at warranty claim but then retracted that saying it’s a problem for him when I informed him that it was his parts department that supplied them and that was with me giving make model and registration!!!!! Again, I’ll keep you posted - getting good reading eh?
Responses to this review
UPDATE: Hi, just to keep you in touch did you read about problems I had with egr valves etc Sooting up? Was the most common phrase used by service manager, think I know how they only change the air, diesel, carbon filters and that at 54000 miles and that’s manual guidelines lol. Now sooting up springs to mind now your 1800 miles £160 3600 miles £230 thats £390 to throw out oil and change oil filter and visually check most moving parts and see what else needs replaced, at extra costs mind. Lamb to the slaughter lol. Next van I buy will be bought from Arnold as to be fair his new vehicle price is good, just wish I could say the same about the workshop aftersales. By the way, only found out about 54000 as I had checked filter at 1800 and it was not changed, was told by service manager that all the filters were changed at 36000 so when I checked at 36000 guess what I found in air filter casing? Yep that’s right, the filter I put in at 1800! Called the service manager to be told 54000! Just as well I am para about the old sooting up syndrome eh? lol. By the way arnold is changing all filters as a goodwill, not by much but that will nibble into the £390 eh? lol, cheers - Hugh Carenduff from Scotland
You should inform them of their obligations under the sale of goods act. They should be fit for purpose and last a ’reasonable’ amount of time. I think you have a case here and remember that ’company policy’ is not necessarily law. Good luck! Craig Halls from Devon
Submitted: 13/08/2010 15:02:19
![]()
I live in Flanders (Belgium) which is mostly flat. Over these roads the car is very nippy. However I took it to the UK on holiday and found that it performed terribly uphill with just myself and one passenger. I too have the rattle which appeared after the petrol tank recall. In wet weather the windows steam up terribly and take ages to clear with the fan. When it snowed here there was more ice on the interior than the exterior. The boot flap/cover is annoying as it keeps falling off or dropping down as I load in my shopping. I had roof bars installed with a so-called ’security lock’. After a couple of days one was gone. On one occasion the steering lock got jammed whilst I was parked. In conclusion the car is great to drive on the flat in dry weather but appalling in hilly conditions and the wet.
Submitted: 12/08/2010 11:09:24
![]()
Bought a 59 plate Pixo from new. Very good on fuel, giving around 55 mpg despite me having a heavy right foot! Common faults include the water leak in the drivers foot well - which was the washer pipe blowing off and the fuel tank sender which were replaced under warranty. Now at 13000 miles a loud road noise has started and Nissan have found a faulty wheel bearing on the front. Garage have been great and are fixing it under warranty but they are doubtful whether they will replace the worn tyre caused by the dodgy wheel bearing. Keep an eye on tread wear on the front tyres as this seems excessive considering the mileage! Overall a good car that represents value for money at a cheap price despite the little quirks... 20 pound road tax for the year is a bonus.
Submitted: 12/08/2010 09:31:11
![]()
Bought one when it was introduced in 2006 (1.6 version with "First Note" edition additional features). After four years, all I can say that this car NEVER ever once disappointed me. It is truly an ideal family car in terms of usability and comfort (including two trips to southern France). When I drive it alone, it also never gives me an unpleasant driving experience in terms of performance. I have had not a single technical problem. Would buy one again without hesitation.
Submitted: 08/08/2010 22:21:12
![]()
Very much as others have said, had about 12 micras, good car, but when I was called Noddy that did it for me. I like the shape, good on fuel, been back to dealers like others, but things seem to be ok now. Got nice suprise on taxing it, twenty pounds for twelve months, can’t be bad. It seems very good using petrol, my service man tells me it’s not got the same build quality as the micra, but if like me you don’t keep them more than three yrs it’s not a problem. The interior trim seems ok, I don’t remember the micras being much better. Nissan seem to have revamped the micra in everything but its shape, but of course, the price has gone up significantly. I think in conclusion remembering that with any new model you are going to get annoying little hiccups, it’s a nice little car, and in no way matches a new skoda I bought some yrs back when the dealer did not want it back. I really felt sorry for the poor sap who eventually bought it.
Submitted: 07/08/2010 21:17:37
![]()
Three sets of shock absorbers, turbo charger, fuel leak, boot lock, the list goes on and on. The dealers are rubbish and Nissan are no better their aftersale service is second rate. I have had this car for two years and have spent most of that time back and forward to the dealers for repairs. I love the car but can not live with the poor quality and after sales service. I Will never recommend a Nissan to anyone, and I am looking to part ex and it has only done 30,000 miles.
Submitted: 07/08/2010 20:40:41
![]()
My minibus has 362000m on the clock, the only time it has let me down is when the alternator went. I service it myself don’t go to Nissan.
Submitted: 03/08/2010 21:42:03
![]()
Bought my 09 X Trail Teckna in Jan 2010 only has 7000 mliles on the clock. On holiday in July 2010 and the turbo has blown, in the garage for 10 days. Dealer loaned replacement while mine of the road. Otherwise lovely vehicle.
Submitted: 28/07/2010 21:33:22
![]()
The car has been great. All through the winter my wife and kids never got stuck or had to stay in once and we live on quite a bad hill. The extra little touches like the wing mirrors adjusting when reversing is great. The rear parking camera is very helpful. And the load bay is very versatile. I have two small complaints. Even for a 4x4 the body roll is quite bad and we also have had a couple of problems with the electrics. The door locks have been playing up (sometimes the intelligent key is dumb) and the driver’s seat has gone all the way back on its own.
Submitted: 28/07/2010 16:15:12
![]()
Bought the car and for 6 months loved it: 52mpg, nice to drive if you are not into speed, comfortable ride and nice high seating position. After 6 months a litany of faults began, 3 new pairs of shock absorbers fitted, 3 diesel fuel leaks from the engine, recalled for steering alteration, 2 door catches replaced and still only done 21,000miles. I have traded it in for a new car before the warranty runs out in November 2010, not a NISSAN.
Submitted: 26/07/2010 14:37:09
![]()
Well, here we go again with the update of Primastar. As i said, the chip installed has paid for itself re fuel consumption. The last thing to go was the altenator. I first thought it was battery but after replacement it turned out to be altenator. Other than tyres and brake pads the van is now ticking along fine and making money for family business, driven by my son Jamie who is not complaining about it (touch hairy wood lol). As for the Renault 155, at 33,000 miles and not a year old, yet not a peep. If only I knew in 2005 what I know now I could have saved a fortune. That said, best not tempt fate, Keep you posted...
Submitted: 26/07/2010 14:24:49
![]()
I am on my second pixo in the last year as the first one got written off in an acccident, but on both cars the front tyres wore excessively on the outside. The tyres on the first one had to be replaced at 9000 and on the second car at 7000. The tracking has been checked ok and Nissan said that they had not received any complaints about front tyre wear. Has anyone else experienced this problem as the dealership and Nissan don’t seem to want to know as they say mine must be an exception.
Responses to this review
You might consider asking a Suzuki dealer - they have more cars on the road and have been selling them longer. Outer edge wear usually indicates too much toe in which suggests the tracking is out. Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
My Pixo’s front tyres started wearing on the outside so I rotated the wheels according to the manual and got the tracking adjusted. I drive carefully and am monitoring the tyres now. The tread does seem to be going down quickly for a light car that is driven carefully - Richard Taylor from Norfolk
My Pixo has just had an engine mount fixed and the rear washer fixed for a 2nd time. Also notice that front tyres are worn at each side - not bad considering it’s only done 6,000 mile since I bought it - F B from Lanarkshire
I have the same problem with the front tyres wore excessively on the outside. It started after 7,500 miles. It’s not a very good car but it’s a company car. The engine is very noisy and after about 8,000 miles, it started to have a strange noise like something is shaking when it is under accelerated - Alex Balint from England
Submitted: 23/07/2010 08:38:41
![]()
I have owned this car for 4 years, it’s done 46K miles, I have just been told it needs a new fuel pump and the inter cooler is starting to leak. The quote from my dealer to replace the fuel pump, and fuel rail injector is £4,880 inc. labour. These cars have a 6 year, 50,000 mile lifespan. It’s a real shame, because it is perfect in every other way, quick for a 4x4, powerful, spacious, economical and very well spec’d. However, dealer and parts prices coupled with poor reliability on the diesel models make this car a tough one to recommend.
Submitted: 21/07/2010 20:22:57
![]()
Reaching the end of the lease, quite sad it has to go back, has been the best 3 years driving I can remember, certainly the most problem free years. Reading other peoples comments I am glad I got the petrol engine as the main complaints seem to relate to the reliability of the Renault diesel. All I can add is that I haven’t had even a moments concern (only 14,000 miles on the clock but lots of that in killer short journeys). Biggest complaint - mpg around 25, yuk. We are a family of 5 and have found it great for everyday and for packing everybody off on holiday. The seatbelts to start to cut into the plastic as mentioned elsewhere but after 3 years I haven’t seen any seatbelt fraying, just a bit of damage to the plastic on the car body. The automatic makes driving the most simple and easy task, you really do wonder why you used to be so keen on constantly changing gears (I live in a town with roundabouts every few hundred yards). You can "change gears" yourself but it’s selected points on the range rather than actual gears so really ok for a bit of fun but why bother when the automatic mode delivers such a smooth ride (and never ever a roll back). Next car, probably another Nissan, probably a Juke, just hope I can figure which are pure Nissan and capture that reliability, it looks to improve mpg over the Qashqai as well which would be about the only thing on my wish list these past few years.
Submitted: 07/07/2010 14:37:58
![]()
Having major problems with the triptronic gearbox, rest of vehicle seems ok but box is a disaster. I would recommend that if you are considering buying one get the manual version or get a big overdraft.
Submitted: 06/07/2010 14:34:09
![]()
These cars have only a 6 year life span. In the past month I have paid £1000 to replace the Intercooler, 2 weeks later I paid £1000 for to replace the Turbo Charger. Now I have been told the Fuel Pump has gone and it will cost around £2000. Nissan should be ashamed. DO NOT BUY A NISSAN!!!
Responses to this review
The first DCi (Diesel) X Trail Nissan made was in 2008. How come you got one four years early? - Mez L from Australia
Australia is just a bit slow - Edzard Biermann from South Africa
Submitted: 04/07/2010 21:38:40
![]()
Covered 20,000 miles in the truck only problem has been a sticking door handle, which the dealer fix under warranty. We are getting good mpg (32+) from the diesel on runs and 26 mpg around town, most people look at the on board computers mpg and forget it’s an historic reading and not current, like some cars... the computer carries on calculating the fuel used from the last re-set. Reset the computer when on a run and look how it improves!!!, Any historic consumption readings will show a bad reading (as it includes starting up in the morning, sitting in traffic etc. the list goes on) As for the paint it’s a water based paint & lacquer that the EEC green policies have forced most manufacturers to follow, and it’s not as good as the older style of paint and lacquer with traditional thinners in. Some manufactures know the problems with the new style paints and apply non water based lacquers as they are harder wearing etc. I guess Nissan was wanting to do as little damage to the environment as possible during the vehicles manufacture and the vehicles life thus lowering the carbon footprint? The time of big 4x4 vehicles is perhaps looking like coming to a sad end due to pressures on the planets resources, we will see more and more electric vehicles, this coupled with the increasing cost of vehicle ownership, will in the long run drive down 4x4 vehicles like the Nissan Navarro, and the trusty but thirsty Land Rover/Range Rovers. For now the Nissan Navara is holding its head above the water very well. On a similar Nissan pickup note... My brother in law covered over 350,000 miles in his Nissan king cab pick up with no major parts needed just regular service items and its Oil changes by the book! He swapped it when the "cash for clunkers" came in & what did he buy? yep a new Nissan pick up!!
Submitted: 01/07/2010 19:55:03
![]()
It’s my wife’s car. It is a nippy little motor (especially for an automatic), it can hit 60mph in about 11-12 seconds and has given larger cars a run for their money. It can go up to speeds of 105 to 110 mph (though I’ve never dared to attempt such speeds ;) ). I have found the car to be reasonably economical, returning milages of 40 to 46mpg (nowhere near the claimed 50-odd mpg that some of the other reveiws have mentioned). It is amazing, however, how much power is left when the car is wound up to 70 or 80 mph but, watch out for squealing brakes at low speeds and a prominent droning/whinning sound at motorway speeds (this could be something as simple as an exhaust fix or, worst case, a complete transmission/gearbox overhaul). Nonetheless, the Micra is one of, if not THE most reliable cars on the road today.
Responses to this review
I have also heard that grind noise you mention and I am pretty sure it’s the ESP, which is some kind of traction control system that put vibrating brakes on a wheel if it starts slipping. I thought it was like transmission or some other kind of grind at first - Yonatan Frimer from Israel
In response to the whining/ grinding noise mentioned; it was a worn wheel bearing that was causing it, this was immediately fixed upon discovery - Alan from Lanarkshire
Submitted: 28/06/2010 16:13:50
![]()
I wish I had read some of these rants before I bought mine! Most of you have described my ’van’ as my bro calls it, down to a T!! Its not a bad lookin jar, but man! What’s up with the components on the thing!? Stalls when it wants and that’s white knuckle when that happens to you on a bend doing 60! And the fuel eco, well that’s just shot! Spend more time at the pumps than my mate, and he works there! Reckon it must be cheaper sending a man to the moon! Engine sounds like its chewing spanners and dumps smoke out the back like I’m Bond! Was told due to ecu...had that reset several times and it still plays up! Could be this could be that bla bla bla.. Whats it got? ..Nissan Car Flu or somthing!!? All this just as it’s out of warranty and svc! Just weeks past it. How strange is that eh!?? I’ll give it one thing it looks phat just sittin there, big Coopers an all that, and goes off the beaten all good (dont trust it though if honest.) I sure wish I had done a deal on Defender and not on this lemon!
Submitted: 21/06/2010 21:16:13
![]()
Cannot say enough about Qashqai, totally reliable, comfortable ride, brilliant driving position, well designed and thought out. A definite recommendation. The 1600 petrol version is fine for normal urban driving.
Submitted: 09/06/2010 09:59:25
![]()
PURCHASED THIS excuse for a car in Sept ’09 and have had all the same probs that have already been posted plus a few more. I have been on to the most unhelpful people at Nissan UK without any joy so I had to trade in and take the big hit but at least I have gone back to what I had before so I know what I am getting. PLEASE DO NOT BUY A PIXO YOU CAN DO A LOT BETTER FOR LESS MONEY (CHECK REVIEWS).
Submitted: 08/06/2010 21:21:00
![]()
I’ve got a problem with the seat belt cutting into the plastic pillar cover fraying the seat belt, future mot failure, Nissan reluctant to fix the problem, plus shockies, how long should you have to wait ’til these are fixed? We’ve now waited six weeks!
Responses to this review
I had the same problem with the seatbelts cutting into plastic, and Nissan told me it was my fault for not having the seatbelt high enough. I pointed out that it cut into my neck if it was higher and their response was "tough". I’ve been through three sets of shockers and two sets of brake discs and pads, shockingly bad after sales service. I have just traded mine in for a Mitsubishi and the dealer has noted another problem with the suspension that Nissan never noted/fixed under warranty - worn suspension trailing arm bushes. I’m so glad it’s gone! I would never buy another Nissan! - Faye from Yorkshire
Submitted: 07/06/2010 21:26:56
![]()
Bought Aug 1st 09 on scrappage scheme from a multi-franchise country wide dealership because my Suzuki dealer could not supply a base model. This was really the worst bit of the Pixo experience. Only when I got Nissan Uk involved did the things progress. I chose the base model in berry red (£400 extra paint choice, what a rip off) with no gadgets deliberately as I consider that air con electric mirrors are not essential to economical motoring, just got power steering which I could not avoid. As an old school driver the car was ’run in’ very carefully for 1500 mls. After that I got exactly what I wanted with 4500mls on the clock the performance and fuel economy has improved dramaticaly. Initially it rapidly ran out of steam hill climbing which involved much gear changing and took it a lot of revs to avoid stalling on take off. Now completely transformed . Getting 58 mpg. It’s never been or ever will go near a motorway or very rarely carry rear seat passengers so can not comment about its suitability in those circumstances. Yes I also got a wet foot insufficent addative in the washer bottle let the water freeze at the rear jet blowing off the pipe, easy to fix. Numerous rattles especially on take off were traced to plastic under tray in engine bay been insufficently clipped. Initially I suspected the engine mounting assy but a couple of cable ties cured it. The recall was handled by an independent dealer who did not supply the car. The part was ordered Monday fitted Wednesday with offer of loan car while work was done. I would have liked to change the petrol flap to a key locking system and used the cable to operate the boot lid. My wife and I find it a fun car to drive, easy to park and get in and out of. Good value for the money. From the other comments I suspect a large group of multi-franchised dealerships are the weak link in customer satisfaction.
Responses to this review
UPDATE: Now at 7000 mls, engine took 5000 mls to really spin freely. Performs really well now and encourages you push it along. Around 55 / 65 mpg depending on right foot technique. Now ready 12 month service. Nothing too extra to be checked. Tyre and front brake pad wear minimal, front pads were noisey under gentle breaking during the cold weather. Received another recall notice so all seems not well in Nissan customer care/ service dept. Will see how their dealership perform when it goes in for service - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Hi Tony, I really admire your positive views of the pixo eg 1.no glove box cover no problem make your own. 2 foot shower easy fix.3 front end rattle no bother fixed with cable ties. 4 three recalls in a year is down to a problem with Nissan care/service dept, when in fact it is down to major faults or they would not have to recall. 5 falken make good tyres for touring cars etc. when the fact is the sincera is a budget tyre. 6 lucky you have only covered 7000 miles in first year.as the pixo has a 9000/12month service interval lower than any other car in its class, I wonder why? - John from Scotland
1). Glove box there for all to see before you buy 2). Foot shower drivers fault, incorrect de iceing mix in washer bottle (weather conditions were extreme), rear jet froze blowing off pipe at sleeve connector in foot well. 3). Plastic trays will rattle if insufficently clipped, no big deal and easily fixed 4). All my recalls have been for the same problem, obviously not logged in system correctly. 5). Tyres reckon i’ll get 40 000+ mls 6 Service intervals 10000 12 months is about right anything more is pushing luck rather than build quality. Do motorist check their oil, tyres etc., these days between services? Seems there are very expensive repairs needed due to lack of simple checks. I bought cheap and cheerful, that’s what I got - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
HI MR CHEAP AND CHEERFUL. It seems you are really up for defending your Pixo but please read your own reviews, faults included and still say this is acceptable for a car that starts in the £7000s i.e foot shower probably owners fault... it would not come off if fitted properly - dealer solved it in mine with... wait for it... a cable tie. Yes, and plastic under trays will rattle if not fitted properly but no proplem again easily solved with that wonder in car maintenance - THE CABLE TIE! And I had 2 recalls in 5 months: first a wiring problem and come to think of it was told by dealer there was loose wiring. I wonder if the mighty cable tie came into play again. Second was for a leak at fuel sender unit - I hope this was not solved with a cable tie. And as for value for money, try a Peugeot 107, Citroen C1 or Toyota Aygo and get a far better car for same or less money... and no need for a cable tie - John from Scotland
Yes John, now you’ve hit the point but I paid considerably less than £7000. At the top of the range about £9000 there are better, but none of the batch you mention are trouble free with water leaks the main problem and as it’s the same car they all have the same problems. As with all cars there can be problems look at the quality leader Toyota. It’s how the dealer tackles the problem that matters and from the posts it seems that where the Pixo falls down. Let’s agree to differ and let some one else have their say - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Now into the third year of Pixo motoring and the car has just had its second service. Very efficiently carried out by a local dealer. The car is used mainly by my wife with me getting the occasional drive. We have both been very happy with the car. Yes, we had a wet foot and a rattling engine mounting but we both think the car is fun to drive economical to run and good value for money. We just want a basic car without the electronic gimmicks, air con, alloy wheels etc which is what we got. Yes, we would buy another. Since its service, we have had the roadside assist extended foc. A satisfaction survey from both the dealer and Nissan Uk - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 06/06/2010 20:50:41
![]()
I needed a 7 seater that could tow a 1.5 tonne caravan long distance on a limited budget and the pathfinder looked like it fitted the bill. It drives reasonably well, engine is a little noisy but willing and the gear stick has a long throw other than that it is a good long distance cruiser. The layout is very functional not made for luxury but it has all the toy’s I wanted as standard. I love the keyless entry and the sat nav is the best I have used in any car; postcode is a minor omission but I normally have the address. I bought the car in December 2006 from Moss rose motors (I would use again) for 23k with 3k discount and free tech pack and low rate finance. I have had the car 3.5 years now and have done 75k miles and it’s bearing up pretty well. Just two faults so far, gearbox seal replaced under warranty and I have just changed the clutch and flywheel, (ouch!! £1250 at Mr clutch, great service will use again) not faulty but started to slip occasionally and I needed it right before towing my caravan up to Inverness, 450 miles. No handles required yet and the interior looks unmarked. Oh, I forgot to mention the obligutory rear door handle mod and paint job. Costs so far have been very good apart from the clutch, but I knew that was coming. Dual mass flywheels and towing do not go together... MPG = 35 on the run to work and 25’ish when towing depending if I stay below 65mph. I not had any pads or discs yet but I guess that will be the next job. 18k service interval is great and no cambelt to change. That keeps the service costs down, (put it towards that new clutch if you tow.) Overall I am really pleased with the Pathfinder it looks almost as good now as it did when new and it would have got 5 stars if it wasn’t for the weak clutch. I would recommend to friends but I would warn about it’s achilies heal, the weak clutch.
Submitted: 06/06/2010 20:44:35
![]()
Designed for a world where speed is less important than comfort and space, Nissan have boxed clever with the Cube. From the crowded streets of Tokyo they have brought to us a wacky way of dealing with our islands doomsday queue of immobility, basing it on the philosophy - ’We’re stuck so we might as well be comfy’. What works in Tokyo has inexorably spread to our urban mayhem and I’m pleased to be able to report that it fits the bill well. Cube shaped it might be, but this is no furry dice. When you roll up in one of these you’re on a winner. Named as one of the fifty cars that changed the world by the London Design Museum, the Cube has been described as a ’lounge on wheels’ where you enjoy your own creative space and style in the city. It certainly begs the question - ’Can we see it as a building block towards the future of automotive design?’ It would take a mean spirited dinosaur to even dream of giving this wonderful little car a square bashing. Cars conforming to the common template are tin a dozen. The Nissan Cube is tangible proof that the frontiers of design lie not in the depths of the pocket, but in pure ingenuity. With its asymmetric rear end with the nearside window wrapping around the C pillar, drivers are better able to see what’s happening on the nearside - handy for kerb crawlers, perhaps: but I have to say that for creatures of the day it affords excellent visibility. Of course, one can give no guarantee that one will see the next stealth tax sneaking up. For that you have to have the new sat nav early warning device only available on H.M. Government website, courtesy of the new Under Secretary, Mr. Spider. The Cube has a range of standard equipment that is beyond most expectations and stretches from bluetooth and MP3 connectivity to sliding and tilting rear seats: not forgetting the big side-hinged rear door that gives excellent access to the boot - all designed to make life easy. In keeping with Nissan’s wacky styling there’s a shag pile mat on the top of the dash which proved ideal for taking items that might slide around - and having already rejuvenated the art of Picasso in his ’Cubic’ period, I realised that if the great man lived today he would have considered the Cube ’a cubic hare in a world of motoring tortoises’, springing ahead of the pack in terms of all those qualities that we now find so necessary - eating ones greens being high on the list. In this Nissan you get sedan chair sophistication for the modern pell mell world that never seems to get anywhere; but those suffering traffic jam delays in a Cube will at least be afforded a grandstand seat in the rubbernecking department. The range starts at £14,000 for the manual Cube, through £16,300 for the CVT Kaisen spec., rising to £15,800 for the CVT version of the LDN. Each variant uses a 1.6 litre, 110PS. petrol engine driving through a five speed gearbox which gives a top speed of around 110mph and reasonable overall fuel economy of about 42mpg. Performance could not be described as brisk - but as sufficient. What does stand out is the smoothness of the engine and transmission and the way it wafts you along in a most relaxed and easy manner. The engine is particularly quiet and one is hard-pushed to hear it running at low revs. Indeed, On the move the Cube is transformed and really is on a roll. Fears of ’brick-like’ wind resistance with noisy trailing vortices are wafted away and it sometimes comes as a shock to see its reflection in a shop window. How Nissan manage to square the circle is an aerodynamic conundrum. Here is a car that seems predicated upon pure utility and turns out to have a sophisticated charm and style of its own. Suffice it to say that it’s better in all departments than one might expect. Its all-round utility does have its limits. Don’t expect to brown your breakfast toast in a hurry because although you might pop up smartly at your destination, the Cube is not designed to toast sliced bread. However, its the best thing since. But I did fancy that as I was passing the pub, the drinkers in the garden were raising their glasses in a toast to me - and judging by the amount of smoke in the vicinity, someone was trying to start up an old diesel in the car park - or have I got it wrong? In the bends it’s far from an angular experience. Turn in is smooth and direct - no sharp edges whatsoever: and for the technically minded the square of the hippopotamus is equal to the sum of the meerkats on the Brooklands banking. Taking stock of the Cube I have to say that for square meal motoring at a sensible price, its full flavoured lack of compromise knocks the opposition into a three-cornered-hat - making for a very savoury proposition indeed.
Responses to this review
So how long have you worked for Nissan’s PR department? I have never read such absolute drivel in all my life. Nobody cares about the poxy Nissan Cube, and that is why Nissan are no longer offering this ugly monstrosity for sale in the UK. Give it a rest ’Syd’, you just sound daft mate - Sneaky Elephant from England
Submitted: 05/06/2010 21:37:50
![]()
This is my third Almera and the previous two have had 120,000 on the clock when px’d and still had plenty of miles left in them. They have only been serviced and a clutch cable broke but that was it. Tried to get my daughter to buy one but to her it was not trendy - who cares if it starts everytime and costs are minimal?
Submitted: 20/05/2010 21:52:23
![]()
What a perfect car all ’round. I can’t fault it.
Submitted: 18/05/2010 18:58:39
![]()
I have 2009 Nissan Navara Aventura auto 7000 miles, on a good day get 20 MPG bad day down to 16 MPH if I am lucky, has had diagnostic on it at Nissan tell me it’s fine and it must be my way of driving it ,has a diesel partical filter on it and have been told that these aren’t recommended for vehicles doing short journeys (Round Town etc) should have been informed of this on purchase you need to give them a good run to get it up to temperature and will then show better fuel consumption great do 100 miles to get MPG where’s the logic in that anyone else have this problem???
Submitted: 17/05/2010 22:54:36
![]()
I have just ordered my Pixo, I mean what do these guys that write bad reviews expect from a cheap car? it isn’t a BMW!!!!! I think it’s lovely and can’t wait for mine to come! I have the accenta which comes with alloys and parking sensors, then I chose to have the bluetooth system in mine because I never answer the phone when I drive and it cost me 10.900euros!! I ordered mine white and I have named her ALBA. I think that they are happy cars and worth the money. Malta is a very hot country and we need cars with a/c, plus our roads are a disaster so it’s no use buying expensive cars. I had a maruti 800 and I bloody miss it, my go cart she was, named Nikki. I don’t have one bit of something bad to say, she was made in India. Well done India, she was fantasic and I am proud to say that I owned one! I currently have a ATOS Hyundai, it is 10 yrs old and I am going to miss it alot, her inside material is the same quality as the pixo, and it is still the same as when I first bought it. Not even one scratch. Everybody keeps saying cheap material, well let me tell you something my husband has a Fiat Punto and all the upholstery is bubbling up and they are not cheap here in Malta believe me because it costs about 14000euros. I dont mind its material inside, you get what you pay for at the end of the day. I still think it’s good value for money because at least it is a very economical car. It was hard at first for me to choose between the Alto and the Pixo, but then when I saw the Pixo it was love at first site, it is slighty larger than the Alto and the finishings are much better, plus my mum and my husband both prefer Nissan to Suzuki!! I
think I did the best buy, and I will tell ppl that it is worth the money!! I give it a 10/10, well done Nissan.
Responses to this review
Hi Christine, I note you have given this car 10 out of 10, although you have not yet recd. delivery. I honestly hope you feel as good about it in 6 months time - Anne Rouse from Lanarkshire
Well, I got my car and she is exactly what i paid for!! I love it!!! I go anywhere, at any time, and find parking, nice ride, cool stereo, for me better than any car I have had and if i wanted something more then that, then i would have had to pay more, but she is perfect!! I’ve already said that people who write bad reviews about this car paid what? 7000 sterling, then you should have paid more and got something better!! but for me she is perfect, and even more than I expected!!!! Everybody looks at it when they see it, the white spray is awsome, the alloys are beautiful. For me paying 10,900 euros for it, was worth every penny!! Christine from Malta
Hi Christinem I’m glad you are happy with your car. I was with mine for about 2 months, then the problems started and I paid over 9000 gbp as it was a Tekna model [top of range] and would also like to to point out that it is a rebagged Alto so is not bigger or better finished. I can also say that there are many cars priced same or less that get far better reviews from motoring press - for example the i10, the Picanto, the Twingo and others... they all have longer service intervals as well plus have world renouned tyre brands fitted as standard unlike the Pixo - Annew Rouse from Lanarkshire
My Pixo is on Falken Sincera tyres. Falken produce excellent tyres for some very high quality cars and produce excellent tyres for the sports and touring racing car scene - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Falken may well make a good tyre but the Sincera is a budget range tyre, the cheapest of their range - John from Scotland
Submitted: 16/05/2010 21:24:43
![]()
Bought this car 2 years ago (4 years old) already replaced turbo and was a bit sceptical after reading some comments on this type of 4x4. Nissan gave me the turbo for free but would not pay for the fitting. Fitting cost £375. Insist on connecting manufacturer if the turbo goes, they will honour it. No problems now. Car running like a dream and so long as you don’t over push it, it will look after you.
Submitted: 07/05/2010 20:42:32
![]()
Overall, a practical,economic and agile performer. Plenty of space for my golf clubs and trolley with the boot extended. 37-38mpg for local runs, over 50 on long journeys and motorways. Solidly built, reliable (so far) car. One major beef: on our appalling urban roads you feel as if your kidneys have been shredded when negotiating potholes and speed bumps. A Qashqai next perhaps?
Submitted: 06/05/2010 16:30:53
![]()
Good vehicle all round, except one thing..ABSOLUTELY S**T ENGINE. Can’t be trusted and keeps costing a fortune. I’ve had it four years and now at 80000 miles. The crank went at 69000 miles. Nissan said they don’t give trouble. I told local engineer about engine knocking, on the phone he told me its prob done 70000 miles and it will be the big end gone on number three or four; he was spot on. Luck? No just experience. I know of lots of similar storys so head gasket gone now. The Nissan is going and I wont be getting another until they upgrade the cranks. Too much power for too light a crank, bad design. What do I get instead that I can trust?
Submitted: 05/05/2010 21:18:52
![]()
Excellent to drive found to be very reliable goes everywhere I have asked it to. very comfortable on longer journeys my only gripes are the door locks, each door has had a problem except n/s/r. The tailgate is starting to rust again around chrome trim despite Nissan ’curing it’.
Responses to this review
Hi, have you had any luck getting this fixed again as we have the same problem but want to know if it is covered by the 6 year corrosion warranty - Rusty Tailgate from Lancashire
I had the same problem, had my Pathfinder from 2005 but noticed some time later that rusting was occuring on the tailgate, Apparently this is a common problem but after 3 years it is not covered under the normal body warranty. I argued but they still refused to do it. That’s what I call good customer care - Ray Porter from England
My tailgate is terrible. I took it to Crystals in Lincoln. The woman who deals with warranties in there said it was a stone chip! So a week later I found another 5-6 "stone chips" so I took it back today and again saw the warranty lady. No its definately stone chips and Nissan wont cover this as it’s a paint defect even though anyone with common sense knows that rust always comes from inside and blows the paint outwards so although I haven’t been travelling backwards at speed, I have a tailgate covered in stone chips. One quick trip to Brooklands about 100yds down the road and the man in there said "Oh yeah, we’ve done two of these already from Crystals and they know there is a problem and this was by far the worst. He phoned Mrs Warranty Woman and hey presto, I’m now having it fixed. He believes the only way to fix it is having a new tailgate and not a repair again. I love the car, it’s excellent at what it does. The aftersales man at Crystals, Simon, is superb and is a credit to them as for the rest, forget it - Steve Trevor from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 26/04/2010 20:21:14
![]()
I bought mine as an ex-showroom courtesy car about a month ago with 470 miles on the clock. I payed £6995 and traded in my old Vauxhall for £1000. I have a 100 mile round trip to make at least 3 times a week so fuel economy is important to me. The Pixo doesn’t disappoint, I’m spending around half the amount on petrol per journey compared to my old car. There is only me, my laptop and lunch box to get to work so the question of passanger comfort and boot space isn’t an issue. Had I needed another family car I would have gone for something bigger, as it is this suites me fine. It’s comfortable to drive, performs well enough and I haven’t had any problems with it (although it’s still early days). I think I got a good little car for the money.
Submitted: 26/04/2010 18:28:54
![]()
I can honestly say the best car I have ever owned. fuel consumption rarely dips below 30 mpg and it carries my wife and five kids all day long uncomplaining. Truely tough motor and love the gadgets. I would recommend one to anyone with a big family looking for a solid all round motor.
Submitted: 22/04/2010 21:20:41
![]()
Bought this over the Kia Sorento (145kw and 450NM torque), and came out of a Subaru Outback H6. Very pleased, fun to drive, luxury all around. Well thought through vehicle, not for everyone but perfect for families. Holds way more luggage than any other SUV (eg Outback, Outlander, Kia, Holden, Ford etc). Noisey when cold, sweet torque curve when warm. Better than most SUV’s for passengers; visibility out of lower windows, squarer design = more space. Very surprised, not hard to give up the Subaru at all (180kw and 297NM torque). The 2.0 Diesel seems a better more reliable unit than the older 2.2 model. I hope!
Submitted: 22/04/2010 14:30:18
![]()
Only had the car a month but we have been very pleased with it. It is comfortable and the CVT makes driving so much easier than a manual. The handling is fine and the seating is very comfortable. I only hope that the faults I have been reading about have been ironed out...
Responses to this review
Adam, I’ve been a member of the Qashqai owners club UK for some time now, and can say that most engine issues involve the Renault sourced diesels. The 1.6 and 2 litre petrols are Nissan units and have proven to be reliable with few problems reported. My 1.6 had a new aux belt fitted as it started to squeal slightly on start-up and pulling away. This was carried out at the first service and is a known issue with the 1.6 engine, a better quality belt is fitted solving the problem. My shocks are the latest revised ones for the previous model Qashqai ( 2007-2010 ) and are totally fine, an early recall was arranged for a steering cover screw replacement ( whatever that is! ) I would definitely recommend a Qashqai to anyone looking for a more stylish alternative to say a Golf, but personally would stay away from the diesels, because the legendary Nissan reliability lives on in their petrol engines - Stuart from London
Submitted: 15/04/2010 15:16:07
![]()
I now regret buying the Pathfinder and would SERIOUSLY warn others from buying one of these due to a design fault that Nissan will not rectify. Basically the pipes that run to the rear heater are badly positioned and corrode through allowing coolant to drain out. To replace the pipes it is necessary to remove the body from the chassis which I find totally ridiculous! Price to repair £1,750 plus!!!!!!! My T-Spec has done less than 50,000 miles and to face a bill like that is ludicrous. The pipes run from the front bulkhead right to the rear of the car in one piece so it is not possible to replace just the rotten section. To check it on your car take off the rear offside wheel and you will see the two aluminium pipes tucked up under the suspension mounting bracket. The corrosion takes place where the binders keeping the two pipes in place are fitted. A natural trap for salty water that when heated and cooled eats through the aluminium. Be aware if buying second hand that it is very likely to happen to this model or any other Pathfinder with a rear heater fitted!! In a car that costs topside of 30 grand it is a disgrace!!
Submitted: 15/04/2010 14:36:28
![]()
Like some of the other reviews written I too am very disappointed in the Pixo well saying disappointed that is a laugh. I have had a Micra for last 18 years or so and yes they have had a few minor problems but not compared to the Pixo. Made in India with the Suzuki Alto so which car is it exactly????? Bought this in October 09 new and since then it has been in the garage every month,and they think this is acceptable because it is under WARRANTY, big deal. Like many I have had my feet washed only this was in the cold snap and the car froze up inside due to the amount of water in the carpet, needless to say they blamed the weather looking at the other reviews this is not so. It has had the front windscreen seal replaced, the brakes checked,the dashboard was vibrating that meant whole dash taken out and packed, recalled for the problem with the petrol tank, and best of all yep the RATTLE that no one but the drivers can hear. It is in today for the 3rd rattle test and as Anne’s complaint having the same treatment the mounting. Am I hopeful? NO. Nissan Uk dont want to take responsibility nor do the Dealers so someone has to ME. I have never felt that this has ever been a new car or it even feeling like mine in garage more times than enough. I have part finance on my car and have now taken it up with them to help me out. So come you Guy’s and Girls who are having problems lets get them sorted and contact Watchdog like Priscilla states and try and get something out of this and not just a box of CHOCS. Whose with us on this?
Responses to this review
I know exactly where you’re coming from, I bought my Nissan Pixo N-Tec brand new in March 2010 and I seem to be constantly getting wet feet, I only took it in 2 weeks ago for them to hook up the back windscreen washer as my footwell was soaked, great for a long drive to London and back with no back windscreen washer!! Yet again I have wet feet today and they say bring it in, we’ll sort it. It’s a 30min drive and I’m sick of it. Also, I had the RAC out and they said it sounds like a diesel car when it starts up, not a nice quiet small new car, which made me wonder. Why are Nissan not sorting the washer in the footwell once and for all?? Does anyone know where I stand on this or who I need to complain to?? Any help appreciated. The other joke, I just phoned for a quote on my 2nd service @ 18000miles and Nissan quoted £260, I nearly dropped through the floor - Claire Higgs from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 12/04/2010 09:49:14
![]()
I have owned a Patrol in Antigua while selling land, it was the only car that could cope with the tough off road conditions after days of rain particularly on the 1:2 muddy slopes I had to climb. When I returned to the UK I purchased a new SVE Patrol and have never been dissapointed since. It has been a great car to own and has always started with no major mechanical issues except: front seat has broken 3 times (under seat height adjustment brackets), fuel pump blocked, but all issues were quickly dealt with by Nissan (KJM Reading) under warranty. It’s a shame the Patrol is now not a UK option as my vehicle now needs to be traded in and I dont really like the new Pathfinder. I contacted Nissan UK this week who emailed me a short one line response saying the Patrol was no longer an option, but showed now interest in retaining my business or suggesting another model. I have looked at the new L200 and will probably become a Mitsubishi driver soon. I will miss the Patrol, it is definitely the King of all 4x4’s and it’s really great when driving in front or behind of any other 4x4 ’cos their drivers know it too!
Submitted: 10/04/2010 22:27:53
![]()
I have had this car for 7 years and serviced it every year at a main dealer. It is mostly driven on motorway journeys to work and has done just over 80,000miles. At its last service I was informed that the gearbox needs to be replaced cost £1300, the airbag warning light has been flashing for the last couple of years (they reset it, but it keeps triggering). The steering wheel shakes at 70 mph. Even though it has new tyres, wheels balanced and the track set-up (Nissan don’t know the cause). The engine warning light has come on and the engine is misfiring occasionally Nissan say diagnostics will be £180 and new sensors or replacement parts another £350. During its life it has needed lots of other repairs e.g. wheel bearings, brake callipers etc. The Nissan dealer will give me a part-exchange value as the car stands of £200. Will I buy another Nissan NEVER!!
Submitted: 10/04/2010 22:00:22
![]()
This is the ’’perfect’’ car. A good auto-change, 40mpg, comfortable for long distance travel and well built. The only trouble I have had was a noisy driver’s door lock which was replaced after a wait of seven weeks which was a bit over the top. Other manufacturers have a lot more faults than this and I will certainly be having another Note Tekna Auto.
Responses to this review
Did Nissan replace it under the warrenty or did you have to pay? Mine has just broken on a 57 and I now have a noisy passenger lock too! - Darren Richards from England
Submitted: 31/03/2010 13:45:28
![]()
If you live in a remote location you will have to pay a lot of money to truck the car to a repairer with a Nissan computer. You can’t even find out what is wrong without investing a lot of time (weeks) and money.
Submitted: 28/03/2010 08:30:25
![]()
My wife and I have (many years experienced and careful drivers) owned our Nissan Qashqai Acenta 1.5 DCI for almost 3 years 17500 miles (only our 2nd ever new car and like most people had to work hard and save for the funds to purchase the car and of course because of Nissans previously good reliability reputation we were hoping for mostly trouble free ownership !!!!!) Although it is reliable and very good to drive. Good amount of technical equipment including packing sensors. I would like to worn ALL of the problems and faults the car has developed Uncomfortable high default setting on the sound system when start up. (Nissan say characteristic of car). TWO steering recalls. Lighting & alarm software reset Door locking solenoid changed (both doors) And of course the now common rear shock absorbers change (DEALERS WOULD ONLY CHANGE FAULTY ONE SO TWO SEPERATE REPLACEMENTS WERE NEEDED AND REQUIRED) and just last week BOTH REPLACED AGAIN (3 SETS OF SHOCKERS IN LESS THAN 3 YEARS) Nissan really, perhaps 1 modification, maybe expect but 2 mod WHAT has happened regarding your quality controls? Both front Track rod end arms (corrosion picked up at 1st MOT inspection, NOT from my dealer) Although thankfully our dealer has replaced these because our car is just within warranty (27 March) This is my 1st review I have ever written and from my experience with our Nissan I just felt I needed to warn other owners of these potential and common faults that they might have/get with their Qashqai’s and perhaps get them checked out before warranty ends.
Submitted: 26/03/2010 22:09:01
![]()
I am amazed that the info re replacement sills for the short or long versions of this vehicle, which on the whole is an excellent vehicle but on looking at loads of them lately (as my son needs one) ALL have rotten sections below the door pillar. It seems like you have to be the secret service to try to find replacement sill panels for these cars on the NET. When we were young I welded loads of different sills onto vehicles that had this regularly found problem. I’m sure someone would become a millionare in no time if they stocked these panels and made them well advertised. What is wrong with Nissan anyhow? The Terrano is a very quality car but this rotting could be avoided so is it built into a limited obsolecense policy. The engines & boxes do up to 500,000 miles I’m told by a reliable source. A green taxi driver (Nissan engine)told me he had 300,250 oon the clock & still going!!
Responses to this review
I’m looking for 2 sill’s aswell for a two door so far no sill’s. If you find someone with them please tell me - Cyril Strain from County Armagh
My wife’s Nissan diesel 4x4 2.7 Terrano 11 P reg rear wheels spin, even on flat grass, wet or not and it is very embarrasing as well as scarey when pulling a horse trailer. Brilliant on road but off road! The 4x4 works so what is the problem? - Harry Jones from Devon
Submitted: 15/03/2010 10:05:35
![]()
Bought this car 3 months old with 1000 miles on the clock for £6000 for my wife. I recently sold my Audi A6 and am awaiting delivery of a replacement car in April, as such I have covered about 1500 miles in the last 4 weeks on my normal commute to East London. I expected the worst and am amazed how little I dislike this car! Build Quality: Seems sturdy, deals well with the pot holes on the route in, easily to keep clean and as such is much more dog/kid proof than other cars. Drive Quality - Surprisingly nippy if you work the gears, accelerates to 70mph in 4th and onto 85mph in 5th without any major hassle. I rarely have to move out of the fast lane on the M11 during rush hour. Handling - As you would expect from such a small car it is easy to drive around down and the turning circle is minute, driving on country roads is fun and you feel secure. The only time the car feels like it is working hard is on a roundabout. Amenities - What Amenities? This is the worst point about this car there are several things I just don’t get, even for a cheap car: No glove box; No ability to dim rear view mirror; No ariel as default While it could be contended that the first point is expensive and a choice the second and third items would add perhaps £5 to the cost of the car. Fuel Consumption: I believe the combined cycle is meant to be 68mpg, I achieve about 58mpg, considering my driving style I think this is more than acceptable. Engine/Road Noise: Yes, but it is a 3 cylinder engine so it is to be expected if you work it hard, I’ve never found it hard to talk to a passenger and the CD covers it up if I want to when alone. All in all the car is a lot better than expected for the money and I actually enjoy driving it in every morning, its not the most refined of cars but it performs well, has been totally reliable and is well suited to a run around or commute car due its low running costs and high economy. PS. In my opinion those claiming this car is underpowered are just not changing gears at the right time, for example this car needs to stay in 3rd until at least 45, 4th till at least 65-75 etc, if you change into 5th at 60 it will no doubt take a year to reach a decent speed.
Responses to this review
Glad you’re happy with your purchase and agree with your view on cost cutting glove box etc., although I think they are taking it too far with the tyres; why no brand name as all other cars in Nissan range have them fitted? Thank you for your driving tips but as I reported I also drive a Peugeot 107, same engine size and 3 cyl, so my comparison was based this - Anne Rouse from Lanarkshire
I think Suzuki do list a glove box lid as an accessory . I just cut out a shaped ’lid’ which slips halfway down the bin giving a two level storage compartment. The lower one is concealed from sight - Tony Hodgson from Lincolnshire
Submitted: 12/03/2010 09:38:58
![]()
Luckily we bought this car on a dealership offer where by we got a grand off the price, plus we argued a further £200 off also. If we’d have paid full price then I would be very upset indeed, as I do not think this Nissan is worth the selling price. We have had endless repeat trips back to the dealerships to have repairs carried out as they seem unable to cope with fixing the car first time. The rearer washer problem is still ongoing for us, and to date we have been back four times - and a fifth time booked for this very week. Have made complaints to head office at Nissan UK but a £20 box of chocolates was all they could respond with. When we collected the car, it had three scratches over dash panels and the radio facias that needed re-work and more re-work and more re-work. So as you can see; our experience of this sweet looking Pixo has been troubled by constant repeated trips to the dealers. We are on the 2nd dealer now as the original Nissan dealership got fed up of us.....so we went to try another. If you are considering buying this car then seriously think about the build quality and the dealership after sales. If anything; insist on a very good deal; ie: money off, discounts, free servicing, free insurance and as much incentives as you can bargain for. Be warned!!!
Submitted: 11/03/2010 10:02:06
![]()
This is the best car I have had so far and I want to buy this car at the end of the lease term. It is fantastic on fuel, plenty of room as my wife and myself are both disabled. We have done 23000 miles so far and we have not had any problems. When the back seats are down there is plenty of room to move what you like. Very pleased.
Submitted: 10/03/2010 20:26:26
![]()
Traded in my Volvo V70 and needed something with similar carrying capacity and a bit of 4x4’ness for the winters in rural Scotland. The car has just topped 50k miles and the only issues so far are minor. The satnav is very big and can be disconcertingly bright in certain conditions and annoyingly dark in others. Yes, you can change the brightness of the display but all you end up doing is moving the problem to a different time of day. The other issue is the fuel filter (I think). It was fine during the bad weather then developed a problem when temps dropped much below -5c. The engine would just lose all power however would recover once the temperature rose. It’s a due a service soon and I will get the filter replaced then. Hopefully next winter the issue won’t raise itself again. Otherwise, performance compares favourably with the Volvo and the general spec (albeit a special edition) is fine. The one thing I could do with though is for the car to warm up sooner in cold weather. Overall a good road cruiser, due to the long wheelbase, with acceptable offroad capability.
Submitted: 09/03/2010 20:07:47
![]()
A great cheap car to run. No worries about depreciation at this age. Had mine for three years. Always starts and above all is reliable. Low insurance, tax and running costs. Love the gearbox, so smooth and returns 45 mpg on short journeys. This is motoring at it’s most basic.
Submitted: 06/03/2010 13:36:37
![]()
Having read the other reports, I have to speak as I find. For me it was a toss up between the Suzuki Alto and the Nissan Pixo, Nissan won due to a much more stylish and sporty front end and better value. Having decided upon the N-tec model, I actually got a little more for my money i.e. Front fog lights, split rear seat and colour coded wing mirrors and door handles (you have to pay more for the top range model with Suzuki to get these). I was also lucky to get metallic paint a lot cheaper. Now to the important bit; I fell in love with my little car the moment I collected her and drove her away. Yes she’s a little noisy on pulling away, but she’s not short on zip and she’s fun to drive. Petrol consumption is excellent. The small boot isn’t a problem, as even with my 5 year old in a car seat, the split rear seat easily folds down next to her allowing plenty of space for my weekly shop. The interior is more than adequate as is the CD player and it’s all well finished. Mine is a 2010 year of make (this site hasn’t yet update their pull down options). I chose the Shell White Pearlescent paint which looks absolutely stunning and I’ve had many admiring glances and comments. I’ve mostly driven Volkswagens, my last was a Polo, but for the money little sassy and chic little car gives any of the small city cars I’ve owned or tried a good run for their money. So far, no complaints here, hence my 5 star rating. Recommended.
Submitted: 04/03/2010 11:05:26
![]()
Bought from new. Fine and comfortable at first. MPG never reached the stated figures - low 30s at best. Then the engine blew up on the dual carriageway - four years old and 78000 miles!! Still waiting for Nissan dealer to phone me back. Very disappointing. Very poor after sales service.
Submitted: 02/03/2010 20:29:37
![]()
Even though it’s an old car, it was the first one I ever bought, and yes it was second hand but it started first time everytime. It was a trusty reliable car, it passed its MoT with flying colours and dhas one me quite a few thousand miles before I sold it on, which I had to because of the kids! I miss my trusty old Micra! It was low on insurance and tax and was a great runner. I would reccomend anyone to buy one.
Submitted: 01/03/2010 10:33:18
![]()
I too have had all the same problems, with the back washer, rattle in the front and now the car is only doing 55mpg extra urban, a far cry from the 74.7 quoted. I’m in the process of discussing this with Nissan. DO NOT BUY THIS CAR
Submitted: 27/02/2010 21:27:45
![]()
My mate owns one and it has been very reliable but to me do you want a car or a van because this isn’t a good compromise. Tyres £140 a go, heavy on fuel a lot heavier than a lwb Merc Vito anyway, high road tax, too heavy to be any fun to drive, no where near as practical as a van in terms of load capacity. Just what exactly is this thing good at apart from people trying to think they’re in the A Team? I dont see the attraction of lumbering nearly 3 tons of steel around for no good reason. Most of these so called 4x4s would be lucky to get driven over a curb once a week or maybe some damp grass let alone even see a hill. Do yourself a favour and get a van, a much better business image in my honest opinion.
Responses to this review
Think you will find that the road tax is the same for all LGVs - £210 per year same as the Vito - Nigel Atwell from County Down
Submitted: 26/02/2010 06:36:15
![]()
I’m so upset after reading the reports about the Nissan Pixo by Anne Rouse and Charles Skinner, I thought that perhaps all the problems I had with my Pixo were just rotten luck. Now I realise that I have actually bought a TURKEY of a car :-( I bought mine in August 2009, and it broke down on the motorway in the first three days. For the next six months, it’s broken down whilst in traffic, whilst moving. It’s not started and lost power. I too get the delightful foot shower when I’m trying to wash the back window. There’s a constant rattling, and I can honestly say I’ve never hated such a new & expensive purchase - the worst decision I’ve made. Now, after seeing similar stories, I’m so cross! It’s in for it’s service today, as it was recalled for having a faulty petrol tank - and as I also listed the other problems to them, they didn’t seem surprised. Anyone up for contacting Watchdog with me?
Responses to this review
Hi Priscilla, The last line of your report was if anyone wanted to contact watchdog with you I am certainly up for that. Like all the other reviews I am currently in dispute with Nissan and my dealers. Bought Pixo in October New!!! or so I thought and since then has been into garage every month. It is in again today for the RATTLE that nobody can ever find they havent got a clue but is going in for 3rd time just for Rattle, just like Anne fed up. It has had the foot wash, vibrating dash board, recall for petrol tank, front windscreen seal replaced, you name it it’s had it. Have asked for exchange but they’re not having any of it, apparently because of unrelated problems, mmm let me see, rattle 3 times that are not unrelated? Think it is time to give Nissan a shock, please let me know what you want to do. Thanks, Jennie Doyle from Northumberland
I am all for contacting Watchdog - Sue Allen from Bridgend
Totally agree with the Watchdog idea. Our car is with a third dealer (as the previous two dealers had the car several times each and one dealer even made something worse - ie. scratched the bumper whilst doing a repair and denied it. Our car at the moment is stripped down (ie. no seats, no carpet, no centre trim) whilst they replace the windscreen seal and dry out the interior of all the mass of water. Made so many complaints to dealers and Nissan head office that I’ve lost track of the number of complaint case numbers. This needs Watchdog to get involved and Nissan to own up to failure. Even if they at least take some responsibility for the cars, I would give the owners half a chance of getting either a swap for a different car or some money back. Seriously bad quality cars! - Greg T from Hampshire
Submitted: 26/02/2010 05:29:41
![]()
I had to renew seatbelts at 123k, also new clutch at 123k. I think I to have get a new car soon as it drives like a banger now.
Submitted: 24/02/2010 15:44:51
![]()
Since I bought this Navara from new I can’t fault it. As I am a builder I use it for work and I also use it socially, travelling on holiday etc. All I have had to replace is one headlight bulb. Brilliant machine.
Submitted: 24/02/2010 06:49:13
![]()
Hi, I have taken delivery on a 2010 Note Tekna, a nice car except the volume from the rear park sensor is a distant faint bleep. I took it back to the dealer who tells me on all new Nissan’s they no longer fit a speaker in the rear of the car, it is just a tiny speaker fitted in the ECU buried under the back of the car and unless I want to fork out £75 for a speaker to be fitted there is nothing they can do. I did speak to Nissan UK who tell me they can do nothing as the dealer has confirmed the unit is not faulty, though I feel it is not fit for purpose if you have to struggle to hear it. The funny thing is you can hear it better standing outside at the rear of the vehicle, so it is back to getting someone to be a look-out if you are backing into a tight space. I have leased the car under the motorbility scheme so unless I fork out even more money in returning the car for another make I am stuck with this problem for the next 3 years. On a car that cost 14K it is certainly not progress, especially when the dealer and Nissan expect you to put up or pay up.
Responses to this review
Since Renault got involved with Nissan, they have really knackered things up! Look at the timing chain issues with the Almera, Micra and Primera. Now the Note is showing up faults with lambda sensors and poor ECU earths - Joseph Priory-Dingbat from Stirlingshire
Have you ever considered driving in nose first, then reversing when you leave? How did you ever manage before reversing sensors were invented? Honestly, some people... - Sneaky Elephant from England
Submitted: 21/02/2010 19:46:31
![]()
I love this nice little new car. I had a micra before, but it was much cheaper to buy a Pixo this time time brand new, a second hand micra was dearer! It goes well with no problems, I do not speed so do not mind, it is an ideal car for what I need in and around town and local country. I would recommend it to any ladies of my age, it is ideal and trustworthy!
Submitted: 19/02/2010 14:30:10
![]()
I bought this car in Aug 2009, traded in Jan 2010. I lost a bucket load of money but was still glad to see back of it. I can honestly say it’s the worst car I have ever owned. Like previous report I also had the same problem with foot shower, sorry rear washer, but the biggest problem I had was a rattle from o/s front after third visit to dealer they replaced an engine mount but this did not solve problem..and after a couple more visits to the dealers and still no joy I had to get rid as they seemed to have the car more often than me. I can also confirm the lack of power, poor fuel consumption and I can compare as my daughter owns a Peugeot 107 that has same engine size but is a lot faster and uses a lot less fuel. I also was really disappionted to find out, after purchase of course, that the car that costs £9000 is built in India that of course is due to low labour costs=poor build quality but 9k is not cheap for such a small car.
Submitted: 17/02/2010 20:24:38
![]()
Having lots of problems recently. Hard suspension which, has been replaced once. Squeaky front leather seats. Door handle trim has fallen off three times now, having been replaced twice. Parts very expensive; two new tyres £300, new front brakes £300, second service £300. It’s only done 25k.
Submitted: 17/02/2010 19:33:02
![]()
Hello, Thought I had a brilliant small 4x4 and it has performed really well up until two weeks ago. Whilst driving at 50mls/hr I changed from 4th to 5th and suddenly there was no drive at all! No warning, no noise or smells, just no drive in 5th, or any other gear. No garage I have spoken to since knows why (including Nissan dealers) so I am awaiting a very long and expensive investigation involving removing gearbox and clutch and whatever else they think of. Has anyone else had this problem? Drive there one minute, gone the next, no warning lights in the management system, no obvious symptoms of clutch wear or anything else? Just when you think you have found a car to rely on you get this!! Cheers.
Responses to this review
I have the Nissan X-Trail 2.2dci fat face, 29000 miles on the clock, today whilst the wife was driving it she heard something pop/maybe snap, then it just wouldn’t drive. The engine starts fine and the gear seems to engage but won’t drive just accelerates as though in neutral. Have you found out what is wrong yet? good luck!! - Brian C from Durham
It sounds like a drive shaft failure to me, possibly the splined end has sheared. This is common on a lot of vehicles, not just on Nissans. It would be first place I looked if I owned it - I would not take the box out first - Anth Lynn from England
I think clutch and clutch disk (mechanical device which transmits power from the engine to the gears (in a vehicle)) should be replaced - Ismail Hakki Atac from Turkey
Submitted: 15/02/2010 15:16:26
![]()
Having owned this car since 2006, it has never needed to go into a garage for major repairs, outside of MOT`s and services, so has been incredibly reliable. It will start first time, every time, even during the recent cold winter spell and after lengthy periods of idleness due to holidays. If I had to make one criticism of my car, it is the fact it is only a 3 door model. This is because I feel it`s a safety issue in case of accidents and the difficulty in getting rear seat passengers out of the car. Of course, I hope this will never be an issue for me but when I do need to look for another car I will seek out a Nissan model with 5 door access in the future.
Submitted: 14/02/2010 21:04:12
![]()
Hi, I just thought I would let you all know that Auto Expess have done a 60000 Miles strip down on the Qashqai to see if it’s actually any good. You will be amazed at some of the things you will read, it could be the answer to all your problems. My Qashqai is a dreadfull car, honestly would not recommend it. Sensible money will be going on a new 3008 (Yes, a Peugeot. Its a fantastic car) or a volvo xc60 even thought it’s alot more expensive than the Peugeot.
Responses to this review
We have just leased our first Nissan after driving Peugeot, Mazda and Volvo, which we found were too small. I’m six foot, and fit in the Nissan with no trouble at all plenty of space for wheel chair and shopping. The 1.5dci engine is a dream on the motorway - Derek Harrison from Warwickshire
My brother bought a new 3008 1.6 HDi Exclusive brand new in November 2009, I also have a June ’09 Qashqai 1.5 dCi Tekna and the Peugeot is definitely the better car! For a start, I have had two sets of shocks on the back, a new power steering pump and turbocharger. His Peugeot has given him no bother at all and it’s a far more advanced car! I am still paying for this damn Qashqai but once my HP is clear, it’s for the road and I might get down to the local Peugeot dealer, though I don’t want to be seen to be copying my brother haha - Micheál McKiernan from Northern Ireland
Submitted: 10/02/2010 09:54:21
![]()
Have had my car 2 years and it rocks, it’s everything a sports car should be, fast, noisy,great looking, and fun. The ride can be a stiff though, my girlfriend always gets out feeling sick. I had a problem with the nismo boot spoiler creasing under the paint but was lucky to get a replaced under warrenty. Thinking of changing to a GTR but heard you lose a bit of fun with the 4 wheel drive! Something you won’t lose with the 350z. If you’re thinking of buying put money aside for rear Tyres, TRUST ME.
Submitted: 07/02/2010 11:24:54
![]()
I bought a Navara from new 07, what a pile of s***, never buy one it’s been in the garage more time than it’s been on my drive. It had a knocking noise when turning left, which Nissan took 1 year to acknowledge but still could not find the problem. They tried to tell me it was wheel spin, then I had the 4wheel drive sensor break, then had to have whole new clutch sytem and the fuel consumption went from 28mpg to 18mpg, called back for brakes, central locking system packed up. Now it keeps cutting out and won’t restart for 6-8 attemps, goes on crawl home mode. I took it to Nissan this morning even though I showed a mechanic what was happening I phoned up tonight and asked if they had looked at my car and thay said they could not find the problem, unbelievable. They will probably say my car wInted a rest and that i should give it a blanket. I would NEVER, NEVER TOUCH NISSAN AGAIN so save your money and buy a donkey, it will probably work harder than this pile of s***
Submitted: 03/02/2010 19:10:48
![]()
This is my wife’s car, well it was until I started driving it. I used to drive a 4x4 Pathfinder, when I sold it I started driving my wife’s Micra, what a cool little car that sticks to the road like s**t to a shovel. The only fault is the radio keeps playing up, maybe a loose wire? No other faults at all, perfect in all ways. BUY ONE, TRUST ME.
Submitted: 03/02/2010 17:17:13
![]()
I leased the van from new, drives excellent, never let me down until I dropped the key down a drain and lost the spare, oops!! Nice comfy driving and looks. Bad points: Back door handle broke 3 times; still not working I have to use side door, judders in 1st gear when pulling away; actually the whole van bangs and shakes. Took it to Nissan twice and they say nothing wrong with it. I think they are good value for money and would reccomend buying one.
Submitted: 03/02/2010 17:13:40
![]()
Bought a new 2008 Cabstar 130 hp tipper from the Nissan main dealer. I also ordered a new tow bar to be fitted by the main dealer before collection of the vehicle, unfortunatly they fitted the wrong tow bar!!! SEVEN WEEKS later the correct bar was installed. Proud of my new truck I decided to treat the metal under parts to a wax sealant, when preparing to spray the wax, having lifted the tipping body for the first time I noticed numerous sections of the tipper chassis and tipper body suffering from serious corrosion (seven weeks old with 120 miles, yes one hundred and twenty miles only!). The cab also has areas of corrosion too, the gearbox is poor with a mix of crunching, stiffness and generally unwilling to actually slot into gear particually 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd. the engine noise is terrible to the point you can’t even hear the radio and the alarm sounds for no reason. I took the truck to my local Nissan dealer and complained...their response after taking 3 days was "wear and tear Sir". nearly one year on none of the problems have been resolved. Buy a VW.
Submitted: 28/01/2010 10:15:08
![]()
Bought my car in Feb 2009 in Spain to return to UK, mileage then @ 60K. Chopped in my 500SL, Spanish Plated and LHD. Since done 13kmiles with absolutely no problems.Journey back,1400 miles,returned 50mpg and was quicker than in the SL...more comfort,much more room and cruised around 90 mph. All the stuff the SL had, hot seats,leather, plus SatNav..much better lights for night driving and the recent bad weather here brought it into a different category. So why haven’t I had Turbo/fuel pump problems etc? I have owned probably 40 cars in the past, including Mercs,Jags,BMWs Lotus,Marcos and "normal " high performance stuff and drive my cars within their capabilities.I didn’t buy the X-Trail to burn rubber. Performance is adequate for it’s design and purpose, and,for continental travel with comfort,space and economy, the best car I’ve had. I fully intend to keep it for long distance stuff to and from Spain, and use my son’s TVR for fun whilst in the UK..Wouldn’t risk taking it further than the Chunnel.
Submitted: 27/01/2010 19:13:49
![]()
I have had 50 cars to date all different models With all kind of problems, But the Acenta 1.6 is good all round car I had my basic faults like shock absorbers and fan belt as the rest of the early ones, but other than that, (no problem) Thanks J Edgar’s of Rowrah, Cumbria
Submitted: 27/01/2010 19:07:29
![]()
I’ve had a few problems: Rear washer motor replaced, door lock replaced, folding mirror replaced, door trim fell off had the struts on boot replaced. Small problems but would have cost a fortune without a warranty also I had a problem with the clutch, apparently it was the selecta switch which was replaced. I’ve done 15000 miles in 3 years, my warranty has now expired, they offered me another year for a cost of just over 500 pounds but I declined. As for the drive, I do find it noisy but overall a good car and love the gadgets.
Submitted: 25/01/2010 10:11:28
![]()
This is my wife’s car. I’ve always driven Fords so this is our first anything else. The diesel is underpowered compared to the tdci but drives well, handles well, standard equipment way above Ford. panoramic roof is fantastic. Build quality is great. I wanted an s-max but now glad I was overruled. Buy one.
Submitted: 24/01/2010 09:53:38
![]()
I bought this car two years ago, mainly to pull our caravan. I agree with the majority of comments below. This summer, the intercooler cracked, the turbo packed in and to put the icing on the cake, the engine ceased. I have recently spent over £4000 on a reconditioned engine and new turbo and intercooler. With hindsight, I wish we’d got rid of it in the summer but we decided to keep it and costs just spiralled out of control. I would advise anyone considering purchasing this car to read comments on sites like this . They are full of common (expensive) stories; turbos and intercoolers. I will never buy another Nissan again.
Submitted: 23/01/2010 18:58:34
![]()
Got mine secondhand 12 months old in February 2005. It ate tyres at first but once the wheels were tracked it has been fine. I tow boats and trials bikes all over the country plus a trip towing to Northern Sweden in 2006 and she has never hiccuped. I have lent her to a lot to different family members and all are full of praise. In the recent snow and floods she was great and felt very secure. Not the comfiest seats in the world and the internal space is limited compared to large MPVs but excellent value for money for me and my family and 2 dogs.
Submitted: 21/01/2010 12:16:24
![]()
One of the first on the road and the only problem after 28 months has been a squeaky fan belt, which was sorted by the dealer. An ideal car with good, higher driving position, plenty of leg room all round. Have ordered new model, the +2, and have every confidence in the vehicle.
Submitted: 21/01/2010 10:31:55
![]()
The van is on on a 54 plate and has done 120,000 miles. It gets worked hard daily and carries around 1 tonne of weight. The passenger electric window has broken and has had to have a couple of track rod ends, but that just from mounting curbs etc. It has never broken down and is very reliable.
Responses to this review
Did you fix your window? Mine went the same, changed eveything, now I cannot get any gears - Jonathan Hingley from England
Submitted: 21/01/2010 10:26:56
![]()
My Murano was one of the first to arrive in Nexico on 2003: 7 years on and no mecanical problems, any! I have climb with it through the snow and Arizona desert; trips from Pacific to Guatemala too, -5 centigrades to 45 and the Black Murano always gives the same great service, ride and problem free travel. I really recommend this vehicle as combines the great Q35 motor from the 350Z with the comfort and 4 x 4 from the famous Pathfinder, wooooow! Confort 10, Design 8, Motor 10, 4x4 system 9, Ride 9, Accident avoidance 9, Safety 10, Brakes 9.
Submitted: 21/01/2010 09:15:26
![]()
Hi folks, I leased this car for running around the doors and I can’t stress this enough - DO NOT BUY A PIXO. The fuel comsumption is terrible, I am only getting 60 miles for £10 of fuel; the road noise is so bad you can’t speak to any passengers. Also, if you do decide to buy one, watch out for the rear washer jet pipe as it’s blown off mine 5 times now and soaked my leg. As for motorway driving... I will never go near one again - you need to rev the knackers off it to acheive a wopping speed of 78mph and if you let off the throttle for a second you’re getting passed by trucks. I hope this puts you of a Pixo because honestly, for £8000 there are much better cars out there e.g a 2yr Mercedes A class will cost you this.
Submitted: 20/01/2010 16:17:58
![]()
I bought my Nissan Xtrail 2.2 dci fatface from new. It had to have a new turbo intercooler fitted after one year, which was done under warranty. 35000 miles later it is losing power at motorway speeds, hope it is not the fuel pump. It’s in the garage this week. Nissan’s reliance with Renault has affected quality somewhat as all diesel engines, gear boxes, some electrics are sourced from Renault. The petrol engines should be fine as they are Nissan. I work at Sunderland Nissan manufacturing and hope things will improve. My previous car was a Nissan Primera gt, which I owned for 10 years, from which I had a 100% reliabilty record. No renault parts on this car, overall most of the other Nissans are fine, just stay away from diesels.
Submitted: 20/01/2010 10:10:25
![]()
I can’t fault it. A lot of car for your money. I think if the reviewers had the car for more than a few hours they might learn how to drive it properly and stop whingeing about the CVT (which i find excellent).
Submitted: 16/01/2010 23:38:22
![]()
Purchased from new, other than regular servicing I have had no other expenditure, I have covered over 40,000 miles and it still has original exhaust and tyres. Husband often drives it and is considering purchasing a new Micra to replace his Ford Fusion.
Submitted: 16/01/2010 21:37:53
![]()
Here is a shortened down version of my letter of rejection sent to Nissan UK: 17000 miles, cut out and stalled at 3000 revs and would not restart until 6-10 attempts so new injection rail fitted; 25000 miles, diff started to whine; 30000 miles, developed knocking from engine; 44000 miles, excessive black smoke on acceleration. Nissan fitted new fuel pump but there was still smoking. Nissan fitted new throttle motor but still smoking, Diff whining even worse. At 46000 miles a new timing chain fitted by Nissan. Strong smell of oil in cab ever since. 50000 miles, Nissan fit new clutch and flywheel to cure smoking problem? They put a solid unit in instead of original dual mass unit, now sounds like tractor and is still smoking. Now covered 54000 miles, smoking worse than ever. Noisier than ever, still whining, letter of rejection rejected by Nissan. These vehicles are c**p. Don’t buy.
Submitted: 12/01/2010 23:56:25
![]()
Buying this was the biggest mistake of my life!. It’s so unreliable, you can tell Nissan and Renault are building and designing cars together because it’s got the awfull reliability of Renault and the boring, uninspiring, dull feel of a Nissan. The engine just about starts in the cold morning and I have had new shock absorbers fitted. Not good for a year and a half old car!! Don’t buy one.
Submitted: 12/01/2010 22:55:33
![]()
I bought a Nissan Primastar 2 years ago with 36,000 on the clock was ok for first year and a half until discs and brakes needed replacing all round at 45,000 miles then guess what gearbox went at 55,000 miles selectors became very stiff hoped it would just be the cable but turned out to be the box, drove it around for a few more miles ant it has now stalled abruptly whilst driving with a red flashing light saying there’s a serious injection fault waiting to take this in to the garage to see what’s next.
Submitted: 31/12/2009 18:55:31
![]()
I have owned my Pathfinder for 20 months now, having owned a Terrano for 4 years previously, and can honestly say that it is the best vehicle I have ever owned. Never get less than 30 mpg and the spec is awsome. Rear camera, Birdseye Sat Nav, Voice Command, Keyless entry and go, Memory heated Leather seats, Blue tooth, etc. Bought it with 2,000 on the clock (ex demo). Now got 20,000 on the clock. Only been back to nissan Garage once (when the phone stopped working) and they replaced a very expensive bluetooth management system under warranty (£4,000). Having the option to take it out of 4 wheel drive is important to me. I drive it in 2 wheel drive most of the time, but occasionally the ’AUTO’ mode is required (where the vehicle thinks for you and selects 4 wheel drive, if it is required. ie snow heavy rain) I will buy another one when it is time to change.
Submitted: 31/12/2009 15:23:02
![]()
Please do not buy this 4x4, buyers beware if your clutch goes and it will you will be looking at a replacement bill of £1K plus. Nissan dealers are a joke!!! Also the rear door handles will break more than once, I replaced ours 3 times. I’m pleased to say this car is now history Part-X for Discovery 3, no comparison.
Responses to this review
You've obviously not looked into the reliability of other discoverys, (which is very poor), I would say you have been unlucky with your Pathfinder. Regards - Dave Stoddard from Durham
Gareth, Sorry to hear you had problems with your Pathfinder and of course you have the right to air them. The Discovery 3 is a great vehicle but certainly not problem free. My brother owned a Disco 3 and had to spend £650 on replacing rear discs and pads within the first year of ownership and had issues with this audio head unit (which LR had to send away leaving him without one!). I do not believe there is a single car out there of which you will not find a bad review or disgruntled former owner. The Pathfinder seems to be fairing above average! I'm still thinking of buying one..- Stephen Ratskin from Hampshire
>br />Hi, where did you get you door handles from and how much? Mine have just broken for the 1st time... Thanks - Kev Hardy from Derbyshire
Submitted: 31/12/2009 15:20:13
![]()
I love this pickup, a bit thirsty but how many other vehicles of this size and weight can sit in the outside lane and keep up with almost any car. The SAT NAV is fantastic, I have traveled around Europe and even found a tiny street in Geneva. Still on it first set of tyres after 27,000 miles, used hardly any oil. Pulled a twin axle trailer with a RR Silver Wreath on the back for 300 mile no problem. Great vehicle recommend it to anyone.
Submitted: 31/12/2009 12:38:51
![]()
I have had my micra for 3 months and its already a big part of me, best car you can ever buy.
Submitted: 31/12/2009 12:21:21
![]()
I bought my rare diesel model 7 months ago with 6 months mot for 350 pounds. slow, yes, reliable, comfortable and very economical more than make up for the sluggishness though. covered 10000 miles to date but oil leak, corrosion and worn seatbelts mean it will probably have to be scrapped at end of the year. My search for a replacement diesel model may be difficult, I’ve not seen another. If anybody out there can help?!
Submitted: 31/12/2009 10:55:31
![]()
My first "foreign" car and it is a fantastic little car, but, it has a problem which Nissan have refused to cure or can’t cure. Any user who drives at a constant speed say 1700-2000rpm on very light throttle will experience the engine surging. It spoils a very good car.
Submitted: 26/12/2009 22:56:36
![]()
I purchased mine in Aug 08 and have had masses of things go wrong. It’s been back to the workshop about a dozen times and is currently experiencing a thumping noise from the rear on uneven road surfaces, has anyone any ideas? And yes, I’ve had shockers changed.
Responses to this review
The problem with the thumping noise from the rear is the bushes in the rear axle, and it’s a known concern. Take it back to the dealers and get them changed - Trevor Mann from England
I had the same problem it was the boot lock... Catherine Kelly from Ireland
It’s definitely the boot lock. An easy solution is to wrap insulaton tape round the keeper and you will find the noise goes away - William Morrison from Scotland
Submitted: 26/12/2009 21:04:38
![]()
I have never towed anything but I frequently drive off-road; it is after all an off-road vehicle right? Then why does my clutch have to be replaced after just 35K Kms? Why does the chassis and body squeak like a 20 year old car and why does the engine cut out descending steep hills with one quarter fuel gauge showing? Also, why do tyres have to be replaced after just 30K Kms on a special sized Nissan wheel whose size is unobtainable at most tyre shops but available at Nissan dealers? Not happy my Mazda 4WD was FAR superior!
Submitted: 07/12/2009 21:32:09
![]()
Anyone else noticed that the sills fill up with water which happily sloshes away behind the internal lining? Having removed the rear wheel arch linings and side trims, I discovered that the water can permeate both through gaps in the sill ends and also through the push in side-trim plugs. Primasters are nice looking vans but are poorly manufactured. Back to Leyland Daf for the next one.
Submitted: 30/11/2009 15:10:24
![]()
I bought my Navara brand new. I’ve had small problems with it, which have lead to big problems with their dealship in Ayr (the only Nissan dealership in Ayrshire).Customer service for sales is good but AFTERSALES PANTS.
Responses to this review
I got to say, your review was not helpful or informative. I’m looking at the Navaras and need more then just being told some Scottish dealership didn’t look after you. Like faults and some kind of comment that I could look in to. Thanks anyway - Joe Truck Hunting from London
Submitted: 27/11/2009 22:09:24
![]()
This truck came up when my mate emigrated to the U.S.A. We are so pleased with it that wish we had bought one years ago. The wife won’t use her new VW as she loves THE BEAST so much. We have even resumed towing a caravan and can’t believe we get 25mpg towing and 35 solo. I know it needs servicing every 6 months but No.3 son is a mechanic so hopefully he will look after it for me. No.2 son was so impressed that he has now bought one. Bad luck to those who don’t like theirs.
Responses to this review
Glad to know your navara is doing well as I’m about to purchase one this week - Liamoohay from Philippines
Hi Dave, you may be able to help me out. I live in Portugal ad coming back to UK in october to buy a Nissan Navara on a 2002/2004 plate. I’m trying to find out approx what co2 emmisions they have so I can calculate how much import tax I have to pay. Thanks - Paul Phillips from Portugal
Submitted: 27/11/2009 21:55:45
![]()
I bought my X-Trail in June 2009. The turbo went in september 2008, so I was 650 quid poorer. I did a bit of history research on the car found out this is fifth time the turbo has been replaced. I phoned the Nissan dealer and the service manager politely informed me that if the turbo had gone 2 weeks earlier it would have been replaced for free as it would have been under 5 years old. He admitted there is a serious fault on dci turbos over spinning causing the bearings to collapse the shaft bend and then the seals go. I could have cried. I might try writing to Nissan but I don’t hold up much hope though, getting shot of it might be a better idea.
Submitted: 27/11/2009 12:07:57
![]()
I have a 2008 model with only 20k on the clock and already it’s had to go in 5 times to get fixed because of starter problems. I’ll never buy one of these vans again.
Submitted: 19/11/2009 16:04:45
![]()
I bought my car privately. It was a ’one lady owner’ car with only 13,750 miles on the clock, full service history, five hundred pounds worth of extras ad garaged in pristine condition. She even filled it with petrol! From the moment I drove it home I knew it was my dream car. I have driven all Porsche Boxster models and owned a Porsche for 12 years. The 350Z is a better car and, in my opinion, better made and looking. It is also £pound15,000 cheaper than the Boxster S! The car handles superbly on motorway, locally and country roads. The sheer power and torque are amazing. The Brembo brakes are Commensurate with the whole quality of the car. My car is 276 BHP, the new new 370Z is 330BHP and 120KG lighter; I can’t imagine how that feels! Recently I stayed with friends in New York and we visited a huge Nissan dealership with all the new models. The 370Z was $29,000, approx £10,000 cheaper. I was born in the wrong country!!!
Submitted: 16/11/2009 13:55:53
![]()
I love my Navara. However, anyone buying any pick up should think carefully. It is not a car, and will not handle or ride like a car, but like a big heavy commercial vehicle. When parallel parking in reverse small cars completely disappear from view - if you’re nervous about that then a parking sensor is available. That said, the Navara is brilliant at what it does. I replaced the previous generation L200 (the new L200 is good, but the load bed was too short, although they have subsequently added a long bed version) with it and could not be happier. It will happily run with a tonne in the back (although the handling does become a lot heavier, with increased body roll). Unladen, it is very civilised and is extremely comfortable for long runs. The high driving position gives excellent visibility and the cruise control, climate control and ABS all combine to make motorway driving effortless. I’m planning to drive to Switzerland with it for next year’s holiday. On long runs (unladen) I get 37-38mpg, which for the size of vehicle I think is very good. In summary, if you’re going to compare it with a modern saloon car then you will be mildly disappointed with the ride and handling. However, how many modern saloon cars have a separate compartment for a wet dog / bikes / collecting firewood / building materials etc. and the ability to go off-road? For me, the shear versatility of the vehicle combined with the high driving position and comfortable motorway cruising more than make up for it’s deficiencies. If it’s a company car then the VAT is reclaimable (unlike a car) and the personal company car tax is reasonable for the value of the vehicle.
Submitted: 14/11/2009 22:16:17
![]()
Fabulous car with head turning looks, (OK the roadster from behind is a bit "broad" in the rear end) but particularly with the top down it’s a scorcher! Ride very firm, and you really have to concentrate on anything but the smoothest roads as the fat tyres grab every rut or imperfection in the road surface that’s going. Having said that the noise this thing makes is just gorgeous! And the performance from nigh on 300 BHP is seriously awesome. Flexibility in all gears means that you can poodle around in 6th gear at less than 30 mph if you want to, and in any gear it pulls away happily from 1000 revs, but actually pulls hard from well below 2000 revs. Storage space is pretty hopeless, amounting to a couple of kit bags and tennis rackets, and economy isn’t a major selling point, fairly obviously. But that’s not what you would buy one of these for. You want to drive it on open roads, changing down through the gears to hear the engine howling and growling as you get back on the gas, and sweeping through bends like it’s got F1 downforce dialled in. Wet roads need to be treated with respect if you aren’t careful, as the power through the rear tyres can break them loose very easily. Opposite lock with the excellent and precise steering corrects the slide instantly, and in the dry the massive Brembo calipered discs stop the beast on a 50p piece. Cockpit is a tad on the cramped side for over six footers, so I can’t vouch for long distance comfort if your in that category. But if you want something different distinctive and exciting, and are not programmed to think only Porsche make sports cars, then it’s a pure delight.
Submitted: 10/11/2009 10:02:16
![]()
Hi! Well I said I would keep you posted so here it is. As i said in my last report i was warned next thing to go would be the gearbox, well wait for it..it is in the garage awaiting delivery of recon gear box. First thing to go were the wires that work the linkages, then the whole box. I was quoted around £1700 from the main dealer but as I was fed up being stung I shopped around and got one for £650 delivered from renault specialists somewhere in England. My local, honest-as-the-day-is-long local mechanics yard are installing it for me and hopefully it will soon be back where it should be on the road with my son driving it making money for our family business. Also, as I said in last report, I have now taken delivery of renault 155 dci trafic, don’t know if its because its a 2000 cc or what but this van seems and feels a total different breed from primastar all round more dig but have only done 2500 miles. I also put a chip in primastar and all the judders and flatness vanished, at £200 quid it will pay for itself in no time as it has greatly improved fuel consumption and makes a better drive all round. Will keep you posted, Hugh.
Submitted: 29/10/2009 23:35:41
![]()
Nice looking fast and very flashy... but total c**p. After 1 day no reversing sensors and they still have not managed to fix them 2 years later. At 4 weeks old it refused to start, I called out RAC and was towed to garage, it was a faulty fuel filter (not covered by warranty). It then ran OK until first service... when I called to pick up van I paid for service (£210). I started it up and the van oil light kept flashing. I stopped the engine and walked back into garage where the mechanic checks the engine - they had not put any oil in the engine! After draining it out, they fill the engine with oil, all 7 litres, and away I go with no problems. At the 36,000 mile service it required 4 brake discs and 2 sets off pads, no change from £600. I say this is a joke. 5 months old, the old wear and tear story, 40,000 miles, no air conditioning (hole in exchanger, not covered by warranty). 70,000 miles, rear antiroll bar fell off, caused by poor servicing, £240 for repair. 80,000, booked in for timing belt, off the road for two days as it was a very big job says the garage - they have never done one before... main Nissan dealer? I called after 2 days to pick van up, they have good news and bad news, the good news is that your van does not have a timing belt (that saved me money), the bad news... your turbo is whining noisily, your injection pump is leaking fuel and your power steering rack is leaking fluid - estimated cost £3,000 / £4,000. I am nearly bankrupt in a van less than 2 years old. Quick solution to the problem - trade it in and buy a Transit, or rent a wreck for a couple of hundred quid and throw it away when its due an MOT. I hope the poor sod that bought it has better luck than me, funny thing is the gearbox was OK.
Responses to this review
Get rid of it... pile of rubbish... I’m on my 2nd gearbox which has done 30,000... that’s started wearing in 5 and 6th. It’s cost me 4 grand in 2 and a half years - that’s without the finance which is £103 a month - Barry from England
Submitted: 27/10/2009 08:42:22
![]()
I bought this van in January 07 brand new, now 48000 miles on it. I use it every day laden with tools and often with a trailer. From day one I found the van to be very sluggish though there is plenty of backup torque; i.e. my mates 100dci Primastar is far quicker accelerating but does not pull as well as my van under load. Also from the start I found the gearox to be vague and slow to accept changes; it very very regulary crunches when trying to change up to third or down to third and fourth. So far my van has been in to the dealers to get a number of things fixed under warranty, none major yet but I suspect gearbox is coming up soon. Fixes so far have been: track rod ends, handbrake assembly, seatbelt pretensioners, fixed air conditioning, re-gas antiroll bar and bushings drop links, air conditioning radiator, all air conditioning pipes, steering rack and tie rods. Although this may seem a lot the first 4 were all done at the same time as a service, there were other items done at that time too but I cannot remember them, the other 5 were done two weeks ago. I left the van in one day, the garage gave me a loan vehicle and my van was ready next evening, all were fixed under warranty. Since it has come back though I now notice a loud whining noise from the gearbox which I couldn’t hear previously as the suspension and steering was banging so much, the whining is definitely getting worse and I reckon it is a gearbox bearing about to let go. Would I buy another Primastar? Yes I would, my van has had problems but they were all fixed with absolutely no questions or queries from my local dealer who I cannot fault. And at the end of the day my van is a work horse that has to work hard every day, it may get serviced regularly but between service works hard. No machine works hard constantly and doesn’t need repairing from time to time.
Submitted: 13/10/2009 09:27:34
![]()
I have 2 of these now. Lots of space inside cab for paperwork etc, gears have been smooth. Very comfortable to drive, I would say a bit thirsty on the diesel in my opinion. Only gripe is that the jack failed first time I used it so be careful. Nissan have replaced it though, so no problem.
Submitted: 12/10/2009 09:28:03
![]()
The 3rd turbo is being fitted as I write!! The garage also tell me that the intercooler has developed a leak and needs changing. From new the dashboard has a rattle but only when cold and the general trim quality is rubbish. I have had many Nissan (Datsun) cars in the past but NEVER again. Renault, who own Nissan, have a lot to answer for!!!
Submitted: 09/10/2009 10:11:48
![]()
Problem after problem: brakes, rear wheel bearings, oil seals, exhaust, Ariel body panels, seat cover, and foam electrics. Do not bother buying these trucks until Nissan have sorted them out maybe a few years how much has this cost me in time phone calls etc £100 and £100s...
Submitted: 08/10/2009 15:46:34
![]()
Question. How small are your testers? Two minutes in the front and rear of a Quashqai revealed that it’s too small for a normal six-footer. In the driver’s seat my head hit the top of the windscreen and even with seat fully lowered I still had to move it back, severly reducing rear leg room. It’s certainly no replacement for the Tino which was, indeed, man-size. No sale there then. I’ll stick with my C-Max which has generous head- and leg- room (and full-depth rear side windows).
Responses to this review
I can only presume you are dreaming. Im 6 foot 2 and find plenty of room - Rob Crabtree from Lancashire
I hate this car, so much so that I took it back and the dealer bought it off me. It’s so uncomfortable behind the wheel and its not nice to drive, on the test drive it felt nice to drive but when you live with it everyday it’s horrid. I had serious trouble with the suspension and exterior trim, also the 1.5 DCI engine really struggled to pull the car in any sort of degree, also in the mornings it really struggled to start. If this car is all its cracked up to be what it’s supposed to be? Stay away and buy a decent reliable car like a Mazda 3, Honda Civic or a Peugeot 308 - Jim Lewis from Hertfordshire
I am very surprised by these negative comments, I have had my 1.5 DCI Visia for 2 years and notched up 62000 miles. I am 6’2 and have found the car very comfortable, I have had no problems whatsoever and have been very pleased with the car, so much so I have just changed over to the NTEC version which is very well spec’d for the money - Steve Kitt from England
I have had mine for three years, the only problem being with the shocks which have been replaced. I am six foot tall and I love the car. I would have changed it for a new replacement but I didn’t like the plain seats, so hanging on to this baby for now - Martin Rutley from Devon
I’ve had my 1.5 dci for two years and apart from one recall on the steering box screw I have not had any faults with the car. I am 6’5’ and 18 stone and find the car has plenty of room front and rear. What’s more the seats are excellent. I drive all over wales 6 days a week, about 45 thousend miles per year, up and down mountains and the M4 and find the engine pulls well. The car returns 56/62 MPG, what more can you want from a car? I will buy another and reccomend it to anyone - Jim from Carmarthenshire
I have arthritis and the problem I have found is that even with the seats lowered I struggle to get in due to the low door height. I love the higher driving, which is why we chose this car, but my husband is only 5’9 and he keeps banging is head on the roof! (he is long bodied!). Previously had a C-Max, the head height was much better in that but the road handling over-all is much better in the Qashqai - especially in the snow - Helen Mann from Staffordshire
Submitted: 08/10/2009 15:40:00
![]()
I bought this used 5 years ago, brilliant reliable car, good handling & consumption, no major MOT work & it’s now 12 years old! Just one piece of advice, my sump rusted through & leaked oil, I was lucky to notice before the oil got too low, so if you want to keep your Almera into old age, get the sump painted/coated to stop it rusting. My local service manager said this is fairly typical of modern cars "They don’t leak oil like cars in the 50s & 60s did, so there’s no oil on the engine casing to protect it from rusting!"
Submitted: 29/09/2009 11:16:08
![]()
Great car, but after 17000 miles rear shock absorbers bushes have spilt. This is a known problem but not a recall. Also, cam belt needed sorting. Otherwise, sat nav and rear camera are brilliant, just like the rest of the car. Postcode sat nav would be even better. I will buy another Qashqai next year; going for the N-Tec.
Responses to this review
Cam belt I was told... the 1.6 petrol qashqai does not have one....? David Roberts from Denbighshire
I’m comptemplating buying one (1.6 QASHQAI VISIA) and would be grateful to have some answers to these questions. 1. Does the 1.6 litre petrol engine use cambelt or timing chain? 2. Does anyone know if Nissan sorted out familiar problems associated with the earlier model (pre-facelift) 3. Any info on real world fuel consumption. Thank you - Kofi Sampong II from Ghana
Submitted: 07/09/2009 09:23:12
![]()
The X-Trail is comfortable and well fitted, but the automatic gearbox is of such poor quality that it should be avoided at all costs. The effect is that of a slipping clutch, and the result was an MPG of only 31mpg. Having complained persistantly to the Nissan dealer and main Nissan office at Rickmansworth, that mine was faulty, they insisted it was ’within specification’. After suffering it for 2 years I could stand it no longer, so sold it. Delighted to see the back of it. I should note that I had happily owned the 1st version for 5 years. Petrol auto. I changed when the diesel auto was introduced. No mention in the literature of a change in the gear box.
Submitted: 04/09/2009 16:00:20
![]()
I keep my 2002 Patrol in the low veld of S. Africa and have done 169,000 kilometres of trouble free game viewing / roof top camping. My Patrol is set up with twin fuel tanks and duel cooling systems. UK reviews are all based on motorways and school runs whereas the Patrol is designed as an off road tank that will get you home when the road runs out. I pull Discoveries and Range Rovers out of riverbeds when their electric brains cook after getting wet. Why place a computer under the drivers seat? In Africa the refer to the Landy camp as Sollyhulls revenge on the earth! I will buy another Partol or the Toyota Model 70 which is still designed for Australia and Africa hard terrain. All in all a great vehicle. Why do you think the UN use them?
Responses to this review
Can’t agree more; our family has recently (a year) returned to the UK after 6 years in Perth WA, had a 01 GU Patrol 3L TD over our time there. These are indestructible vehicles, built for REAL off-road activity. Disco (any)/X5/Pajero/Jeep need not apply when the going gets proper tough! Arguably tougher than the Toyota trooper carrier - Trev Mortimer from Gloucestershire
Submitted: 04/09/2009 10:08:56
![]()
This was my second Primastar as the lad that worked for me met a large HGV on a country track and wrote it off. I went for the long wheel base instead of short as it is more handy for sheet materials. These vans seem to have same problems over time; the first being that when stopping for a short time, at junction or street end it goes into an annoying judder as if to stall, then it’s fine until the next stop. The work shop staff treat you as if it’s your imagination even though the boy that works with me witnessed it too. The next problem is with the windscreen top rubber seal that goes awol at speed on the motorway - try getting that from the fast lane - then the windscreen cracks bang on centre, this has happened to both vans at about 45k. Then the clutch slave cyl goes just on warranty up - Nissan have gone halves with me with on cost but I still ended up paying about 1.5k. And then came what they call the limp mode; the engine won’t go any faster, about 20 lorries on motorway love you as they all toot ther horns and wave as they go by - I get to garage and get humped for another 1.2 k (2 weeks of trial and error, $pound;75 each test and another part replaced, mostly fuel related I think). I was almost sleeping in waiting area as I was desperate not to let my buisness go under. I said yes to everything just to get my van back and it never quite ran the same after that and the Nissan garage that I bought my van from eventually admitted that they where embarresed learning at my expense and sent it to there Renault branch who sharply fixed it and hit me for another £500. I wonder if I could have saved 1.2k? I’m back working away trying to recover some cash to stay afloat when bang power steering goes, another £400! Then, bosh goes track ends and ball joints, more cash then the beep that you get when arming alarm doesn’t beep any more! I have replaced so much of this van that I am keeping it till it dies. Don’t laugh, but I am taking delivery of a Renault trafic with a nissan engine that I am assured by the dealer is the same van but without all the problems. On a positive note, the van is at 120,000, running at its best and giving 750 to a tank (and that’s full of tools). I will keep you posted...
Submitted: 04/09/2009 10:03:59
![]()
Fantastic car to own. Very reliable, very quick for a 4 x 4. Great spec with sat nav, leather and sunroof. The reversing camera makes parking a big car very easy. Great Bose stereo too. Was a little thirsty but approx 25 mpg, a lot better than some. Thoroughly recommended and great interest when advertised to sell on. Very small negatives are no memory seat, no outside temperature or fuel average indicator.
Submitted: 28/08/2009 11:17:33
![]()
Brilliant car!! Great value compared to others in its range and much faster on-road and capable off-road... Under full servicing. A door replaced because of minor accident which has many issues... but that is only the dealers fault... I love the car and it does not have mechanical issues... no matter how roughly it gets treated. It got hit on a speedbreaker twice at 80kmph and thrice at 60kmph and only thing that happened was a loose skid plate!!!!! Well my actual location is Nairobi, Kenya.
Responses to this review
I have a 54 plate 2.5 petrol SVE, bought second-hand in 2008 for £6k, a total bargain. It handles well, needs nothing doing to it (just passed another MoT). It’s great for the snow, rain and mud though not brilliant on mpg but then it’s a petrol and at the time it’s why I got her so cheap. Fantastic family/dog car with absolutely no probs...thank God I didn’t get a diesel! - Angela Fell from Worcestershire
Bought 2000cc petrol X-trail new in England in 2002. Exported it to Cyprus 18 months later. It has now done 175,000km and has only had one major problem, at 160,000 km, and that was the oxygen sensor mounting in the exhaust manifold breaking away where it was welded. Cost £700 with new sensors. Excellent car, really impressed. Would love to buy a new one except that they no longer make a petrol version, so from the write-ups about the problems with diesels it looks as if this one has got to last a long time yet. Disappointed with the stereo system though, had to have both the radio replaced once and continually have problems with the CD player going into error mode - Chris Dodds from Cyprus
Submitted: 26/08/2009 08:43:25
![]()
Bought my 2 year old Navara at Measham Auctions for £10,300 plus VAT plus buyers fee; a total of £12,330. Love it to bits, very different to driving a car or van, it needs to be shown respect, doesn’t like corners at speed. My biggest gripe is the fuel consumption, in 2005 they brought the euro4 engine out to comply with the EU emissions laws and the fuel consumption went down, down, down. I went for the auto and had l known how bad it was, l would never have bought the truck. l,m lucky if l can get 18mpg and l drive it carefully to keep it at that. l’m looking to have a power box fitted which increases the bhp by 30+, the torque by 45+ and more importantly l’m told the fuel consumption will be 5mpg better and for about £400 fitted so it won’t take long to recoup the outlay. I’m a plumber by the way.
Submitted: 24/08/2009 10:55:38
![]()
Good work horse and economical to run. Ideal truck for narrow lanes.
Submitted: 24/08/2009 10:29:46
![]()
Lots of space and well equiped for a 2003 car. Problem is that expensive things break down on these cars! We needed a new intercooler (which is just like a radiator but laid on its side - it cools the air to the engine) and were quoted over £2000 for the part alone!!!! That is approximately 18% of the vehicles original new price! Why do Nissan attempt to rip customers off in this way? The part must cost about £50 to make. We managed to buy a good second-hand one off ebay for £30! but I will NEVER EVER BUY ANOTHER NISSAN simply because of the rip off prices for parts + the dealers are unhelpful and hopeless. I’ll go back to VW!
Submitted: 19/08/2009 10:11:21
![]()
I have had two major breakdowns concerning the gearbox and have found it to be unreliable in that respect. It is a very costly to have this job done, running into the thousands if not done under warranty. That is without the lost revenue whilst the vehicle is off the road, roughly two weeks at a time.
Submitted: 18/08/2009 08:54:24
![]()
I haven’t had this very long but decided to write this anyway incase someone is thinking about buying. This is a replacement for an Almera. I love it. It is so easy to drive. I am at the moment finding it hard to stick to the speed limits because it is very nippy and I seem to get to 30mph much quicker than in my Almera. I have taken it on the motorway and felt more confident about overtaking than I did in the Almera. The car was late so the dealer lent me a Micra to tie me over as my tax and M.O.T expired. Overall it did compare to the Micra 1.2 except on the motorway where it was slightly slower to the 50 mph mark. As the manual points out it is a 3 cylinder engine and so it is slightly noisier when moving in 1st gear. It is true that the interior is not "flash", but then again what do you expect for under £9000? I would have thought that not everyone is buying just to save money. Whilst the saving on tax and petrol is appreciated, it is a green car. I might have considered buying the Techna if it included a few extra luxuries that I have got used to driving Nissans for years e.g. volume control from the steering wheel and a better music system. As it is I have got an mp3 cd, air conditioning and remote entry. I am quite tall and there is plenty of room at the front. However, I wouldn’t want to be sitting in the back. There is very little room in the back, especially if the front passengers need to push the seats back to get leg room. For me this isn’t a problem as I rarely have rear seat passengers, but it could be for others. The boot isn’t roomy either. You can put your shopping in it but 2 sets of luggage might be a problem. Again I think Nissan could have added a feature for the rear seats to slide forwards to make more space in the boot on the most expensive model. I would guess that the space issue is no different on competitors’ models because it is meant to be a small car, but I bet that some of the missing features are available on the Yaris for example although you would pay considerably more for these features. This is the main reason I have given a 4 rating.
Submitted: 12/08/2009 09:58:09
![]()
140,000 miles up. 36mpg. Okay it has blown 1 turbo, intercooler and fuel pump at 59,999 - but not long after I filled with petrol by mistake. Otherwise far far far better than my previous two Freelander’s (both mk1 and >100,000 miles). As a forester I am hard on my 4x4 but the Xtrail is excellent - and very good on tarmac - faster and almost as good handling as the Freelander. (Freelander feels tougher off road and is probably better but for the insanely high first gear and lack of low down grunt).
Submitted: 05/08/2009 08:45:23
![]()
I’m having major problems with the techtronic gearbox juddering in first and reverse. I am now on the 2nd box in 2 years. Has anybody else had the same issues?
Responses to this review
I’ve had this problem. When pulling away slowly the van shudders and bangs violently and I can drive. I took it to the main dealer twice and they say nothing is wrong with it - Glyn Keast from Cornwall
Submitted: 04/08/2009 16:28:38
![]()
I bought it new in 2006 and it has been a good reliable vehicle. The fan belt went (not the original one) in June 09; it jammed underneath the timing belt and bent the valves etc... Had to have a replacement engine. I went to a place called NAP in Oldham and it took them 2 weeks to do it & they forgot to fill the gearbox with oil. It siezed 85 miles later and me cost me £2k to fix. I got it back on the road 2 weeks later and the turbo seized which cost me another £1k. Would I buy another Primastar? Yes. Would I use NAP again? NO!
Submitted: 04/08/2009 16:27:07
![]()
I have driven the GTR on public roads and on the race track. Whilst it is very quick and you can become involved in an exciting experience on the track where it does stand out as a very capable easy car to enjoy. On public roads it is very docile and easy to drive. What it lacks is involvement in terms of sound from the exhaust, and road feel and feed back. To the point of becoming a boring day to day car. But because its awesome speed comes up so fast and effortlessly, you could lose your licence real quick. Compare it to a Subaru STI or Porsche GT3 which gives you great driver feel and involvement at slow or high speeds. The GTR needs a better sounding exhaust and the driver needs to be allowed to hold the gear changes for longer during shift up. But it still is a great car.
Responses to this review
Yes, Rick you are quite right, super fast car but does lack the gut churning feel you get from a Ferrari or Lambo at full bore. Not enough seat of the pants feel and sound to really make it an exciting car to drive - Peter Anderson from Buckinghamshire
Submitted: 20/07/2009 15:32:29
![]()
A superb and very reliable van - being narrower than most large vans it is ideal for working on narrow roadsides. As a mobile mechanic it has served me without a fault for 5 years even though I have neglected it!! (cobblers shoes with holes etc). Only problem is that it is too highly geared so is a bit heavy on fuel for its size.
Submitted: 17/07/2009 14:43:26
![]()
A brilliant car but dogged by silly problems. I agree with the chap about Crystals - I got mine from Lincoln: flat tyre on front and covered in scratches and no service completed, low fluid levels, not even wiper wash fluid. The car (now fixed all under warranty with new clutch and flywheel and injectors) after 20000 miles is superb. The lack of service and help from Nissan GB is unbelievable but the car is robust inside and very comfy. I don’t get brilliant mpg, about 26-27, but am looking at a chip mod to see how it goes. The district manager at Crystals was ineffective and rude. If you have a problem like I did go straight to the managing director. I did ask them a week ago for some information about the TMC system but as usual I should have spoken to the wall - it would have been more effective. Don’t be put off with this car though, it’s brilliant, it’s just the Nissan support that’s c**p.
Responses to this review
Hi Steve, I am the Guy who wrote about Crystals. I won’t go into any more Crystal bashing as I made my views clear at the time. However the commercial director based at their HQ at Boston gave me a cheque for £500 costs and all the tyres we renewed and the service sorted out. However due to the fact that their was never a 18.000 miles service in the warranty book Crystals put a dealership warranty on it. The lesson to be learn’t here is find out the history of the car. Mine was a cheap buy from Enterprise car hire but on the log book it showed the parent company name. Thus hidding it’s true identity. I was told by the salesman from Grantham it was a 1 owner company vehicle that is renown for looking after it’s vehicles. In fact it was a thrashed beaten up donkey with 36.000 miles on the clock and purchased for about the 8K mark and priced to sell. The fact that it was given to me in a dangerous condition goes without saying. But they are not alone in their poor service. I have been dealing with WLMG Shepperton branch and on 3 of the 7y times I have taken a vehicle for warranty work it has been returned with a employee generated problem. (C**k up) of duff information by poorly trained service staff. Regards - Peter Andrews from England
Submitted: 16/07/2009 09:16:33
![]()
Bought s/h with 30k now up to 71k. Fully serviced. Car us a real contradiction: great to drive but every day you wonder what next is going to go wrong. Camshaft sensor failed 12k miles ago, replacement etc cost £200 but already it is failing - sometimes the car starts, sometimes it does not and towing power is down. Intercooler has a leak; door seals are coming off; exterior window trim is corroding; passenger door locked shut and could not be opened, door had to be dismantled as lock corroded; tailgate lock corroded. I love it & hate it - a super vehicle spoiled by poor quality control and the ever present awareness (unknown when I bought it three years ago!) that this model has a serious history of failed turbos and intercoolers. I would not have another.
Submitted: 10/07/2009 09:38:46
![]()
This has got to be the worst car I have ever owned. Don’t be fooled by the electric/heated seats, the aircon, the leather, automatic box, sunroof, metallic paint. This is a tractor masquerading as some kind of lifestyle. Great for builders who want to step up from their trannies... or maybe not judging by the previous reporter.
Submitted: 26/06/2009 10:41:08
![]()
Bought this brand new in 2003. I thought it was the nuts... then joining M25 from M26 at junction 7 one morning - without warning there was a huge plume of black smoke form the exhaust. I limped the truck to the hard shoulder and called the garage although the vehicle was still under warranty they would NOT recover me or the truck, ABSOLUTE shambles - this was at 25,000 miles and 2 years old. The problem was injectors and turbo (replaced under warranty). Then at 55,000 miles the engine let go big time I managed to catch it before the conrods came through the block (apparently it is unusual to save the block). So in it went for a engine rebuild, I have to say at this point Nissan wanted what would have worked out to be £5,000 plus to replace the engine. It then covered another 4,000 miles and the crank let go, fortunately the guy that did the engine is a friend and it got rebuilt under warranty. It is now 2 years on and the engine has gone again at 75,000 miles, I can’t afford to spend any more money on this pile of crap so its being broken for spares. Oh and £300 for a throttle sensor... you are joking. FYI the new model engines are almost identical DO NOT BUY A NAVARA. I love the truck but the engine is s**t and Nissan customer service is non existent.
Submitted: 25/06/2009 09:09:45
![]()
A fantastic car -not all QQ club members are dissatisfied with their cars! (see comment 11/08/08) Great for fuel-long and short journeys. Very comfortable and a great ride position. We replaced a Nissan Primera estate but haven’t found the smaller boot a problem at all and it’s very quiet. Yes, I do have 2 niggles-the size of the clock and when you attach roof bars you have to pull away the door trim but other than that if we had the money would would buy a second one!
Submitted: 11/06/2009 14:31:08
![]()
I agree mostly with the report stated below. I however, have some concerns - the driver’s seatbelt gives off an annoying creaking sound that can sometimes be overbearing, especially when you have a passenger you are trying to impress. I have tried countless times to get it changed under the warranty by Fidelity Motors in Jamaica (that is where I am from but the country is not in the listing), but has been told, after several test drive by the service representative(s) that most of them have this problem. Also, just now after two wonderful years, I have a slack driver’s seatbelt and I have never been in an accident. The seatbelt just does not spring back anymore with that vivaciousness like it used to. I also notice that the front passenger’s seatbelt will soon follow suit, but there is some restraint still in it for now. I have moved from a car to this type of SUV, and have driven heavier SUVs, and noticed that it does not turn corners as in a car, in that, it feels as if it will overturn and this is when you really accept that this is a light-weight vehicle. Overall, however, I feel proud to drive one and despite the few concerns glad that I had made that choice in purchasing.
Submitted: 10/06/2009 09:59:00
![]()
Bought my Nissan Pathfinder in 2007 brand new after looking at the Land Rover Discovery. Decided against my worst judgement to go for the Nissan. However was not impressed with the first service... couldn’t believe what is not covered... have previously owned a Land Rover; who are excellent at keeping their word by the way. Anyway here I sit with my Pathfinder in the garage; clutch has gone at 31,000 miles and Nissan probably wont cover it, they say it’s wear & tear. I am disgusted with them; I mean the door handles (made from plastic by the way) came off 1 yr after i bought it and... surprise surprise, they’re not covered either. Anyway the moral of my story is never buy a Nissan; give me back my Land Rover Discovery any day.
Submitted: 10/06/2009 09:44:53
![]()
Got one brand new in 2006 and besides having done 272,000 miles (yes two hundred and seventy two thousand) it has had no problems at all. I do 2000 miles a week and it still drives superb. Lease expires in two months so I will be buying one. A star performer.
Submitted: 08/06/2009 09:37:42
![]()
This is my second Qashqai Tekna. I bought my first on May 2007 and was delighted with the car for the time I drove it. I just had to upgrade to the 2009 model. The improvements I have noticed over the 2007 model lie in the 18" wheels the Tekna now has. In the few days I have had it 3 passengers have commented on the superior ride. Not that the other car was bad mind! The Connect system appears to be very functional incorporating Sat Nav, bluetooth connectivity, radio,CD and MP3. The colour reversing camera is a good upgrade over the 2007 model too. Rear privacy glass, a new silver grill and 10 spoke alloy wheels only enhance what to me is a very nice car. As for reliability both cars start first time every time and although the 2007 model had a problem with a whine from the fan belt in wet weather it was cured by a trip to the dealers. Hopefully the 2009 model with not suffer with the same affliction. I did mainly urban driving in the 2007 and managed about 35 Miles per Gallon. On longer trips the MPG rose up to 42 when using the cruise control. One happy Nissan QQ owner.
Submitted: 02/06/2009 09:06:28
![]()
Test drove the following cars: Mazda5, new Toyota Verso, Outlander, Captiva, S-Max, C-Max and Insignia. S-Max still best of the bunch but way to pricey (and a bit too big for the missus). But Qashqai+2 not that far behind. Excellent diesel-engine, great seats (leather in mine), very large panoramic roof, room enough in the boot (family of 4). Highly recommended.
Submitted: 28/05/2009 09:18:51
![]()
Great car when compared with the Astra, Focus and Golf. Each of these competitors have their merits, Focus great to drive the Golf being classy etc, but the Qashqai combines the needs of everyday life brilliantly. The 1.6 engine has enough power for both town & motorway driving, it’s no boy racer but keeps up with faster traffic easily. Having the high seating also makes pulling out from junctions a lot easier, and adds to a feeling of being secure, helped in part by the cock-pit like feel of the interior. To date I’ve not had any issues with my QQ, the fuel economy is around 30 in town, which is not too bad ( considering its size ) and should improve once loosened up a bit. Also group 5 insurance is what you would expect for a super-mini not a car in this class, which means that my ownership costs should be competitive. Finally the quality of the fit and finish is top drawer, but the quality of the materials used are not quite in the Golfs league but easily better than a Ford Focus.
Responses to this review
Considering this is a modern car I think that the fuel consumption is poor. I am due to get a 1500dci QQ but as it stands the 1600 petrol QQ is no better on fuel than my 1998 Renault Scenic 1600 petrol, which does 30mpg in town and upto 44mpg on a steady run. I recently spent a week up in north Wales. The drive to north Wales from south Wales consist of winding A class roads. I averaged 41mpg over the 5 days which consisted of the journey there and driving around local roads when I arrived. That is excellent for a 12 year old car with nearly 140000 miles on the clock - Kevin Cozens from Swansea
Submitted: 27/05/2009 10:44:25
![]()
Have had this car since 2002 with 70000 miles on the clock. Driven through pretty much every terrain you can think of - including some very muddy off-roading and the beauty keeps taking the abuse and begging me for more. It really is an under-rated MPV - tough, reliable and easy to maintain. Gripes? well the interior could be nicer, cassette deck even in 2002 was out of fashion and has never been any use.The buttons on the dash are a bit cheap looking and over time have proven they are with most of the paintwork peeled off. This is in stark contrast to the exterior as the bodywork has done beautifully - less the marks and scrapes it receives from my adventurous driving. The engine is competent but could do with more power in the lower revs - a known issue with this particular model and is helped only a little by using v-power diesel whenever I go adventuring, which is often. The air mass filter has been replaced twice, check this first if you experience any loss of power and not the throttle sensor that some garages elude to. Overall a great MPV which I’ll happily upgrade to a newer model next year.
Submitted: 29/04/2009 08:45:26
![]()
Very impressed with the car. The appearance is quite pleasing but dynamically; great, even when fully loaded. Fuel consumption is very respectable (35.5mpg), ride and handling superior to anything similar I’ve driven. Acceleration is very impressive and ride/noise very smooth/quiet even at high speed. Audio sound quality is terrific, seats comfortable; heated leather a real benefit. Loading is easy, volume cavernous and all washable. Reliability has been flawless. Great car for field, urban road and motorway. A really refined work horse; a car for all occasions/seasons. Thanks Nissan!
Submitted: 24/04/2009 08:49:42
![]()
Probably the worst car I have ever owned! Sounded like a tractor and drove like one. Six speed manual clumsy to operate and the fuel consumption averaged 24mpg. Rear view camera and keyless open/start were useless gimmicks... sat nav was nowhere as good as portable Tom Tom. A very disappointing experience which I am glad to say is now over.
Submitted: 20/04/2009 13:17:02
![]()
In the past two years I have downsized from Volvo S80 to Audi A2 (unreliability personified) and now to my Micra 1.2 automatic. The level of refinement, build quality and equipment levels of this car are excellent (and I tested many small mainstream cars before deciding on the Micra). Despite it being automatic I am returning up to 50mpg and although the 0-62mph figures look depressing on paper the very smooth and precise auto box belies this. I would recommend that anyone considering a new city car look beyond the glitzy cosmetics of some of the rivals and have a serious look at the Micra.
Responses to this review
Since it is an automatic, what type of gear box? Is it a conventional box with a torque converter or a CVT?? Have you experienced any problems with the gear box. Thanks - Spencer from Middlesex
Submitted: 14/04/2009 11:59:50
![]()
Bought the van new, always really happy, saved myself a lot of money as its dramatically more economical than my Peugeot Boxer that it replaced. Normal things needed attention, brakes,s ervicing, two track rods replaced. The van drives like a car, very comfy and reliable, so why the poor rating? Well at 76k miles the gearbox started to make dreadfull noises, I called my Nissan dealer to see if he had any ideas, but obviously they were not familiar with any gearbox related issues with this van!! However after several calls to local gearbox speacialists I found this to be completely untrue and was told by all that the fault was well known and terminal, to the extent that one guy even guessed the mileage it had done and was spot on. They said they had seen a couple fail at 50k ! Expensive repair, I now know of three other people with same problem, all going back to Transits.
Submitted: 08/04/2009 09:53:01
![]()
This is a great, great car. 4 stars do it justice though. I have have a couple of issues with mine (listed below) you should consider before buying. 1. Leather - Not good. When I bought mine it was 18 months old and the driver’s seat has already started to crack and wear, rubbing off the tan surface leather layer. By comparison, I also have a 12 year old Mercedes and the seat leather is, even now, in better condition. 2. Wheel Bearings - This is a little known fault that is on most dedicated 350Z forums. Nissan feign ignorance of this issue and fobbed me off when I asked them about a rumbling in the front left (under warranty). I haven’t driven the car much but need to get this seen to as it’s getting worse. 3. Mazda RX8 - If you are considering an RX8 against a 350Z consider this. Forget performance, forget looks, forget mpg, forget colour(!), if you want to be the one sitting in the true driver’s sports car, it’s the 350Z every time. The Mazda has 4 doors, so takes the kids. In 5 years it’s style will be so dated you’ll think you’ve been transported to 1999, and it doesn’t stop traffic the way a 350 does. It’s also too much of an all rounder to be a ’serious’ sports car. 4. Fun - I have driven mine to the south of Spain (a longer, twistier, more interesting route), and I vowed I would NEVER sell this car. My daughter’s arrival has put paid to that, but I will NEVER forget it once it’s gone. Get one, you won’t regret it.
Submitted: 01/04/2009 09:14:28
![]()
I bought my Note last July and have done 14,000 miles so far. I bought it second hand and had 7,000 miles on the clock at the time. Overall I like the car however if I knew that Renault were involved then I would have bought something else. I’ve had a fractured roll bar at 18,000 miles, had the manifold tightened four times, drivers window will go up and down for no reason in wet weather and now I have to take it back with a strange noise when I start the engine from cold. The garage seem to think it’s the alternator belt or pulley has come lose. Apart from those little niggles I like the car, perfect for my work as I need good mpg around town but the trips to the garage are a bit annoying now. Time to get rid I think and look at an alternative.
Submitted: 30/03/2009 09:58:41
![]()
Bought one of these and I do like them... I have 7 of the old ones and they are bullet proof... .mine crunches gear from 1st-2nd also and I had a dealer respray which was very bad quality and front fogs fitted with badly drilled out cut outs. No problems as yet though but the only better things are the cab space and the power...
Submitted: 23/03/2009 10:12:39
![]()
Got the van second-hand, it had done 30k. I have it serviced every 18k - it’s now done 140k. I only change the normal pads disks & filters. The only real problem I have is that it eats brake lights on the back offside but other than that it’s the best van I’ve had & I would buy another anytime.
Responses to this review
Hi Mike Do you still recommend the Primastar because I am thinking of buying one at the moment. Thanks - Neil Powell from County Down
Submitted: 23/03/2009 09:21:47
![]()
Having bought the truck at the end of January new, I have now realised that I made a mistake. I really miss my Transit, so decided to trade in for a Primastar thinking I would get a good trade in staying at the same garage - "oh no". I have done 1400 miles, they are offering me half what I paid for it, the paint - well you only have to look at it and and it scratches back to the primer, so as you can tell not happy.
Submitted: 16/03/2009 09:35:14
![]()
Drove off forecourt proud as punch with my new Cabstar but 1st to 2nd crunch and jam. Back up to their forecourt to be told gearbox will bed in,1 new gearbox and 2 new gear change cables later having covered 27000 very uncomfortable miles the truck's no better. Nissan should be sued for selling goods unfit for purpose at time. I didn't have enough money to take such a huge firm to court. Now what's the point as they appear to be going under… I wonder why! Their customer service is the worst I've ever come across and their trucks are even worse. I have had 2 older ones which were superb. I'd buy an Isuzu if I were you.
Submitted: 13/03/2009 10:46:37
![]()
Bought it in September 2005 after being pre owned by dealer with 9000 miles on the clock. It has now had three new turbo’s (all on warranty). At a cost of £975 plus VAT each. I am dreading the turbo blowing again now I have to pay for it. The plastic studs on the rear door seals have failed and I have failed to source new ones at a reasonable cost (£160 from dealer for new seals, not just studs). Average 36 mpg solo and 26 towing my caravan.... not bad. Overall the car is satisfactory but nothing to write home about. I will not buy another one. I understand the new 2 litre diesel engines are causing more problems than the old (fuel pumps, underpowered). Not a patch on my previously owned Isuzu Trouper which was a superb tow car but rather too heavy on fuel (18 mpg towing), road tax and insurance.
Submitted: 13/03/2009 10:35:33
![]()
Don’t buy a Nissan - the after sales service is c**p. It took Nissan 8 weeks just to look at my Primastar after it was taken to Aberdeen by the RAC. No van; no work; no money - Nissan are s**t. Buy a Toyota.
Submitted: 11/03/2009 09:01:39
![]()
Thought I’d give you our thoughts on the base model which we are about to return at the end of its two year lease. I’ve rated a 3 but 3.5 would be fair. Good points : Looks good, plenty of space, nice cabin/materials, higher driving position. Bad points : Notchy gearbox, could do with 6th gear for motorway cruising, servicing expensive. We’ve been happy with the car over the last two years bar the comments above. Average 34 mpg over the two years for mainly about town running.
Responses to this review
Hi Steve, I have had my Qashqai 1.6 N-tec for 4 weeks now and am really enjoying the drive. There are a few niggly things that I could comment on, but overall I am really pleased with it. The main issue I have, and I shall speak to the dealer this week about it, is when I approach 70 miles an hour (around 67-73 miles an hour in fact) I get a lot of vibration under the accelerator pedal. The steering wheel doesn’t shake, just a lot of vibration on the pedal. I know it is only a 1.6 and I expect it to struggle a little at that speed, but I never had that vibration in my 1.6 Astra. Any thoughts? Claire from Kent
Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:35:39
![]()
Best equipped 7 seater 4x4 available! Every mechanic warned me to stay away from Landrover and so I did! The Pathfinder is a workhorse and has every extra you could imagine. Great car - would highly recommend!
Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:25:26
![]()
Which eBay tuning chip did you get? (Re: Peter Andrews, England) I am wondering which product you had off eBay as I am not getting too many mpg with my Pathfinder: less than 30.
Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:15:16
![]()
Get a manual we average 44+ to the gallon and more on a run. The other comment is improve the way you drive!
Responses to this review
Hello and very interested in your comment. I presume that you are talking about the 1.6 petrol model? I have had one for 2 years now and find the fuel consumption is nothing like it is claimed to be. If I coast everywhere that I can plus never taking the revs over 3000 when accelerating and keeping below 60 mph then I just manage to get between 35 /37 miles per gallon. And yes this is on a extra urban run and driving like a pussy with even reliant 3 wheelers coming by me!! And this is just me -the driver and no excess baggage! The rest of the car I have no complaints with but how Nissan can get away with these downright lies over fuel consumption I will never know. If they had have around 39 mpg ’extra urban’ then this would have been about right!! I have had the car checked and nothing is wrong. So come on Nissan, get your tests correct and stop conning people. Maybe I should have had the diesel model. Does anyone else have this problem? Would be interesting to know - Jon Whitehead from England
Submitted: 02/03/2009 09:18:29
![]()
Manos Man - all I can say is you can’t drive or you had a dodgy car! My Nissan handles perfectly round corners at 100mph not kph. Suspension is good, acceleration is good; all round a very good reliable family car.
Submitted: 26/02/2009 09:06:49
![]()
Brand new van and was told at 4k miles by Arnold Clark that van needed new discs and pads on front of van. vibrations through the steering, electrics playing up, roll bar bolt needed to be tightened, engine management lights keep flashing on/off whilst driving!! The rubber strip across windscreen (outer) blow/came off and this was not replaced under warranty. The reversing sensors were faulty as Arnold Clark in their wisdom disconnected them and said there was a problem with them, asked when they would be fixed...said they didn’t know!! The radio/timer whilst trying to change time the whole thing collapsed into the dashboard. GREAT WORKMANSHIP...NOT!!! Broke down a few times and the last time happened a few weeks ago and the van is still in doc. After only doing 30k this van seems to be prone to all types of problems. Still got the old faithful Transit that is able to take over and keep me on the road. Should never have bought the PRIMASTAR. Please Take Note...Look out for the gearbox problems as could cost you and arm and a leg!
Submitted: 23/02/2009 10:50:42
![]()
Having owned Nissan Cabstars in the past, all purchased from new and had excellent, solid, reliable service from all of the models, my expectation of the latest version, 35.13 was high. Unfortunately, the opposite is true. Yes, the cab is bigger and more plush , the service from the Nissan dealer was and still is awful. After a 20 mile trip on the M1 and stopping the vehicle, it then refused to start due to a faulty battery, half pressure tyres etc. Dealer told me to ring the RAC ( I’d owned the vehicle for an hour!!) as they appeared disinterested. Numerous problems later, including gears crunching, paint coming off and rust, with many calls to customer services have still not rectified these problems. In my opinion the new Cabstar isn’t a patch on the old. The engine is noisy in the cab, the gearbox is a bag of nails and it drinks fuel like an alcoholic!! WHAT A SHAME. In this day and age I think the vans competitors deserve to take the Cabstars market.
Submitted: 18/02/2009 12:45:07
![]()
I own an 06 1.5sx Almera. Standard kit is fantastic compared to much more expensive cars, e.g. - climate control, air con, half leather, alloys, full body kit etc etc. You know what they say, you can with a Nissan!!!
Submitted: 09/02/2009 09:15:26
![]()
I bought this vehicle as I suffer from arthritis of the spine and my Patrol 30 gr was a little bumpy. What a difference the pathfinder is - 34 mpg on motorway and 25 in town. However I put a plug and play tuning box from Ebay at £80 and now the BHP is up from 171 to 206. Torque is way up so is top end. But most of all I did a complete circle of the m25 with the cruise controll on 60mph and got 46.5 mpg. I now get 30+ Urban (when it’s warmed up). I love the car but you only have to look at the bodywork and a scratch or chip will appear. Water based paint is soft . I think as the Patrol was 7 years old and never showed any signes of scratches. My biggest disapointment was the dealership. Crystals of Grantham; there after-care is a disgrace. The car was presented to me with the nearside front tyre on the limit. The spare bald with a 2" split. Wipper blades worn out. No service or fluids topped up. A busted rear light cluster. The rear bumper was the wrong colour and the car had clearly had a rear end shunt. One of the backs of the seats had torn away from the leather and the sun glasses box in the roof is busted and keeps coming down and covering the interior mirror. The car is on Motorbility HP. What a disgusting way to treat a disabled person. They boast that they cannot be matched on customer care or presentation and that there vehicles go through a 94 (I think) point check etc. I keep being given the brush off as I live in Staines they think that I am to far away to do anything. I have gone to Nissan GB as well. So folks if you want a Pathfinder then go for it and fit a tuning box. But do not, under any circumstances, purchase it from Crystals of Grantham, Lincoln or Boston. Do so at your peril...
Responses to this review
Hi Peter, I’m hoping you might be able to help me. I bought my Pathfinder last June when I bought a caravan and wanted something more robust for towing it safely. I love my Pathfinder but I have been having real problems with the fuel economy and my Nissan dealership keep telling me that they’ve run the diagnostics and there is nothing wrong. I too have been plagued with silly little faults, the most annoying being the DVD player hasn’t worked for 6 months which is frustrating going long distance with the caravan and children and not being able to use it! I really don’t know where to go next re the fuel economy though. Using the old fashioned method of running it from a full tank and tracking mileage I am getting 19mpg. On reading everyone elses reviews they all seem to be getting so much more. We have a 2008 model with an automatic gearbox, which I thought would make a big difference on fuel economy but the official figures show that it should only lower it by 1 mpg. I just dont want to run it at this cost. Could you advise if you can on: a). Whether this seems realistic? b). Who I should go to next to get if fixed? c). What type of plug-in you used to improve yours? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks - Sarah Raeburn from Fife and Kinross Shires
I’m only getting 20 mpg urban from my automatic Pathfinder. Could you please tell me which tuning chip you purchased from ebay? Thank you - Darren from Lincolnshire
Could you guide me on the tunning box you fitted in your car as I am looking for a good one - Sree Amar from Cheshire
Chaps, I’m looking at a Pathfinder SVE tomorrow (11th Sept). I previously had a VW Bora TDI150 remapped via the OBD port (direct to ECU - not chip or box) by Celtic Tuning and boy what a transformation. I mean seriously torquey and that’s coming from someone who’d owned a 300bhp Scooby just beforehand. For sure I will use them again on the Pathfinder (if I get it). They’re about £360 and quote improved figures of 212bhp and 355lbft (481Nm) for the 171bhp Pathy. I’ll post here if this all transpires as planned - Kevin from Nottinghamshire
Submitted: 03/02/2009 09:45:22
![]()
I got the van from new in 04 and have had no problems with it so far. I have done 97000 miles; it gets serviced regularly but the main dealers are very expensive. I get 750 miles approximately to every full tank. This has been a great van so far...
Submitted: 30/01/2009 09:30:53
![]()
Bought in 2005. 2 years old and in the first six months it went to garage 14 times! Control box under dash kept putting left indicators on when it felt like and after three trips to the main dealer (Nissan) I pulled half the dash off and left the control unit hanging out so they could figure it out. It costs £70 every time they plug it in, not that they even know then what’s wrong. The power steering pump blew to bits on the Argos car park making a mess. The electric window motors fell to pieces and the alarm kept going off. The reversing sensor box packed in... sliding door kept jamming... interior lights just fall to pieces every few months.... eats track rod ends. The main dealer garage said you can’t buy just track rod, you have to have arms as well and charged £550... when track rod went again I had it done elsewhere. Steering is so light and vague it wanders about. I had a new clutch, it cost £800. It’s now developed flat spots. It once decided not to lock... when I got to the garage it worked again. The connectors on alternator had to be fixed. I have to constantly fiddle with wires under seat because the wiring on the pre-tensioners is crap and keeps disconnecting airbag and putting service light on. I found out after I had bought it (kept quiet from the garage) that it had had a new gearbox because it lost most gears. It does however start well and is very quite and nippy. I average about 33 miles per gallon. The washer motor packed in.... these are just some of the things that went wrong. I paid £8000 for it when it was two years old plus £2000 on extras. It’s cost me £3000 in repairs in only 22000 miles. So that basically is one hell of an expensive motor. Don’t by the Primastar, Trafic or Vivaro they are total shit and you will pay out thousands... and the main dealers charging 75-85 pound an hour. I haven’t got a clue how to fix them. I have had two Renault’s before this and they were incredibly reliable. It might have a Nissan badge but it’s a Renault. Everything on it is stamped Renault but Nissan will still charge you three times more for the same part. If I need parts I go to Vauxhall because you can buy the same part for a third of the price. The government are worrying because nobody is buying new cars. I think it’s not because of the credit crunch, I think everybody is starting to realise just how crap modern cars are. You can review any vehicle under the sun and there all the same... crap, crap, crap. If I bought a Dodge Ram and did about 8 mpg I would still be better off. I wish I had kept my old van, it didn’t have a turbo or ecu but I used it everyday for four and a half years and all it had was two wheel bearings replaced. The stupid thing is I sold it to better myself and do a bit more to the gallon. It looks like the laugh is on me.
Responses to this review
My power steering failed and while trying to drive the van to a garage, the steering wheel came undone. Yep, undone! I just turned it fully to the right and it engaged again. It has done this a few times, so watch out because I dread to think what would happen if it failed on a motorway - Stephen Porter from Kent
Submitted: 19/01/2009 10:06:51
![]()
Very pleased and satisfied - good handling; very reliable; starts first time; good on fuel consumption for mileage.
Submitted: 07/01/2009 11:17:30
![]()
Nightmare!! Do not buy one and never use Parks Motor Group of East Kilbride!! I bought this car when it was just over a year old, with 11k on the dial. In the 18 months that I’ve owned it, it has been into the dealership 15 or 16 times (I’ve lost count!) for a variety of issues. Several of the visits were rework as a result of the ineptitude of the local Nissan Dealership from whom I purchased the car (Parks Motor Group in East Kilbride) being unable to resolve problems without 2, sometimes 3 or 4 visits!! The most concerning of these is that the electronic ABS, ESP and 4X4 systems frequently display faults, meaning I lose all of these aids whilst driving, so compromising the safety of my family. Despite several visits on this matter alone, the dealership don’t care as they keep claiming that the system hasn’t "logged" a fault and will not, despite evidence of the problem provided by me, investigate any further. I have contacted Nissan Motors GB directly, and they have attempted to wash their hands of the affair, blaming the dealership despite the series of flaws I have encountered with the product they manufactured. I so wanted to like this car, but it has been a major disappointment and, more importantly, a serious concern as regards safety since I took ownership. Warranty expires in a few months and I think I’ll need to P/X the car, as I don’t think I can afford to repair it at the rate at which it is failing.
Submitted: 30/12/2008 15:34:20
![]()
Brilliant little car which actually belongs to my wife but when my own car broke down I scrapped it and decided to use hers until I bought a new one. That was 3 years ago and I drive it more than she does! If I decide to buy a car for myself it will be a Micra, which when you consider I am 6ft tall and weigh 17stone is quite amazing. The only thing that could be regarded as a problem with ours [mine] is when we go over a bump, sleeping policeman or a depression in the road the front suspension make a crunching noise which is a little annoying to say the least. After 4/5 inspections none of the mechanics are able to find any fault. I would appreciate any comment on this.
Responses to this review
The sound that you hear from your front suspension, when going over bumps etc., is the front shockers, which have rubber bump stops. They may look ok on inspection but with the weight of the car they are very thin, which in turn hits the inner body when going over bumps. Just replace the upper rubber bump stops, easy to do yourself, if I can do it anyone can - John Stone from Warwickshire
Submitted: 08/12/2008 10:38:26
![]()
Bought second hand 2 years ago. Had bother twice previously with immobiliser, new parts both times & now back in garage for same problem. Very comfortable & easy to drive otherwise.
Responses to this review
If it’s a petrol, try the cam sensor instead of immobiliser parts. It’s a common fault and has the same symptoms ie. turns over but won’t fire - Wayne from England
Submitted: 08/12/2008 10:34:23
![]()
We bought a late 54 plate pre-used X Trail October 2008 to replace a Mazda pick up. With only 20k miles on the clock it is just run in nicely. I had the car fully serviced and made sure that the ECU was updated to limit the turbo spin (quite a few turbos have blown on 2.2 dci). Added Slick 50 to the gearbox which has made the box very smooth (it was a bit "notchy" before) and got a Warranty Direct insurance just to be on the safe side (£300 buys a lot of peace of mind). We have taken it out on 2 long journeys so far and we love it. The 135bhp power unit has bags of low down torque (which should come in handy when towing our caravan), it cruises at 70mph quietly, good economy (about 39mpg), it is a stable and relaxing car to drive and the CD/Radio sounds great. Heated leather seats with electronic adjustment are refinements that I would never of bought in a new car but add ownership pleasure. Great big sunroof and a "no lip" boot which makes it so easy to get the dogs in and out of the load area. Overall 99/100 - wish I had bought one earlier.
Responses to this review
Can you tell me any more information about the up grade ECU for the turbo please? I am just about to buy a X trail for the first time and would like to prevent the turbo over spinning - Eric Bishop from Norfolk
Submitted: 25/11/2008 09:38:37
![]()
I purchased a Cabstar at the end of September, at first I would say what a vast improvement on the older one. The cab has so much more space with compartments behind the seats and in the dash keeping paperwork and straps nice and tidy. The engine again so much more responsive than before. The driving position is more like a car and overall a vast improvement on the old one. The cab that now tips forward to get to the engine instead of having to hold the seat up. I must say the RAC man that I called out after having the vehicle for one day because the power steering hose came off found it of benefit which is the start of my negatives. From the first time I drove it the gearbox crunched in 2nd & 3rd gear, I put this down to a new vehicle needed a bit of time to wear in. Unfortunately after 1800 miles it was still doing it. A quick call to the local Nissan dealer to find out that there is only 25 Nissan dealers in the whole country from Scotland to Cornwall that has the ability to work on the new Cabstar, my nearest one happened to be 1hrs drive away! After getting it there and them having it for 2 days I get a phone call to say that there is nothing wrong with it!! A call to Nissan UK customer services and again they say its normal, that is how it is meant to be. WHAT!!!! I take it this is a safety feature so you know when you are entering 2nd or 3rd gear, doesn’t look like they are interested. Unfortunately they have now spoilt what I thought was going to be a very good vehicle but anyone in there right mind wouldn’t buy a brand new vehicle that has a gearbox that crunches in 2nd & 3rd gear. Would I buy another one, I REALLY DON’T THINK SO!!!
Submitted: 25/11/2008 08:47:19
![]()
4 star looks, intense blue - great colour. Only one thing... I drove 10 miles after filling it up before the petrol gauge moved from full and started dropping - so not great.
Submitted: 18/11/2008 14:32:11
![]()
Avoid like the plague. Bought from new, 3 turbo’s down the line (1 under warranty) and now up to £2k plus for a new fuel pump. No more Nissan’s for me.
Responses to this review
You’re right. This is my last last Nissan, too. I have a Qashqai since brand new. No more Japanese cars for me. No more Nissans. OK, Nissans are cheaper than European cars, but we get what we pay. Then... expensive replacament parts, not long-lasting cars. I’m all right with used my BMW 530TD. I’d rather pay £60 more road tax and £240 more on fuel yearly than paying £10000 more for a brand new eco-friendly Jap car vs a 10 years old German quality! :) Just do the math! - Mike from England
Submitted: 14/11/2008 14:18:24
![]()
Reluctantly swapped much loved Cavalier (12yrs) to treat my wife but have fallen in love all over again - she is quiet, comfortable and responds beautifully (the car that is) - very impressed.
Responses to this review
Hello Have you had any problems with the CVT auto box? How is the mpg?? Thanks - Spencer from Middlesex
Submitted: 14/11/2008 14:13:37
![]()
Plenty of power without trailer. Very poor road holding and slides easily with a trailer. Even with a load in the trailer ride has been made more comfortable by putting in helper coil springs. It would be super if it had the Pathfinder suspension - already gone in for faulty brakes and an electrical upgrade - all warranty.
Responses to this review
Hi. Could you tell me where you got the helper springs? - John Ahern from Ireland
Submitted: 13/11/2008 15:34:13
![]()
Having just got the Note I think it is a very good car. We had a Mazda 3 before but it was unsuitable for my wife who is disabled. Having looked at various options we went for the Note. I fancied an automatic for a change; the change through the gears is very smooth - there is much more legroom than in the Mazda. I find it a very well finished car; a firm ride at low speed but it evens out on motorways. My wife has a electric scooter for mobility which fits easily into the boot with no problems. I had to dismantle it to fit into the Mazda. The Note is no sports car but is nippy and more than able to maintain motorway speeds with ease. All in all a very good car.
Submitted: 12/11/2008 09:12:03
![]()
Well, my clutch has started slipping today at 38k. Having read other posts on the Vivaro & Trafic this seems to be the norm. The clutch and gearbox are not up to the job - had prices from £670-1k from the stealers for a replacement.
Submitted: 06/11/2008 10:34:14
![]()
This is my second Terrano, the first being a 1998 SE Touring. This car, although being a lower trim level, has everything the older SE Touring did except the roof bars and sunroof. Smoother and quieter, with the same old rattles it has plenty of pulling power for towing. A genuine high up drive it is excellent on the open fields I have to use it on and equally comfortable on the streets. Not the most modern feel but a genuine tough vehicle that does everything I want it to do. Excellent value for money, even though I think I paid a little more than I should have. Two annoying rattles. The centre arm rest/stowage box lid seems loose and of course, the exhaust. Exactly the same on this one as the other one. Overall? Great if you take it for what it is. An excellent value tough old bird!
Responses to this review
I have just tried selling my 2005 Terrano 2.7 td, high spec, FSH, good condition and am amazed at how little they are worth, I’ve had no interest at a mere £2,500. It is a much better drive than most 4x4 comparatives, it’s hard to fault and seems not to be worth the price of an old worn out landy. Crackers! - Paul Anderson from Caithness
Submitted: 27/10/2008 15:55:03
![]()
I purchased my pre-registered 2006 Colombia X Trail 2.2 cdi in July 2007 with delivery miles only. It came highly recommended and I believed the official MPG figures - big mistake! After 3000 miles I achieved 30 MPG at best. Nissan dealer and Nissan customer services said this was acceptable! I have now completed 22000 miles and average has gone up to 32 MPG. After a few weeks the rubber trim round both rear doors came away and the plastic studs were lost. Nissan dealer could only sell me the complete seal - £160.00 plus VAT per door! Nissan Customer service offered me a 10% discount. Local body shop obtained the plastic studs and fixed the seals - no charge! My first service cost £175.00 and the bill came with a £560.00 plus VAT list of extras (not under warranty) that I should have done. I took the car to a local garage and they agreed some of the items needed done but most did not and charged me £120.00 including VAT for the lot. If you buy, do not expect quality after sales back up or the economy figures they claim. By the way I have just sold mine!
Submitted: 24/10/2008 15:38:16
![]()
Just bought my Terrano 3.0 SVE. Absolute bargain. Massive towing capabilities. Full leather, 7 seats. Love it! Bad points: wind noise; power steering pump a bit noisy as well. It will out-pull Disco’s, Trooper’s and Shogun’s. Top car for little money. This car cost me £3200 @ 50k miles - full service history. Top that!?
Submitted: 21/10/2008 12:22:18
![]()
A great family car with plenty of goodies. Good on fuel and so far faultless.
Submitted: 21/10/2008 09:59:38
![]()
I have had my Primastar for the past 2 years. It hasn’t missed a beat. The only problem I have found is it goes like stink some days and seems to be lugging on others. A lot of other people have said their vans are the same. I can’t really fault this van, it drives and handles perfect . I did have it super chipped as soon as I bought it, well worth the extra expense. Lovely van.
Submitted: 06/10/2008 10:47:26
![]()
Not as tough as they look.... I ran a pathfinder for 2 and a half years and 55,000 miles (it was 6 months old when we got it and had done 5000 miles). I’ve just p/x’d it as I couldn’t risk owning it out of warranty. In the last 6 months I owned it it spent 4 weeks at the dealer and I had to drive a Micra - not very useful if you have a large family. Things to watch - on a manual the clutch is suspect and early ones had problems with the flywheel (ours was replaced - clutch and flywheel - at 54,000 miles - paid for by Nissan). At 50,000 miles the the fuel plump, rails and injectors had to be replaced/refurbished (took garage 3 and a half weeks to sort) - this is also a common problem and damned expensive if out of cover. The other thing was that part of the exhaust system needed replacing and ATS etc can’t get parts so you have to buy the official Nissan bits (a 2 foot front pipe was £275!) a full system is around a grand. The alternator was replaced at 7,000 miles. Must say all claims were sorted by Nissan without question - so I have few complaints at all other than the time some repairs took. Really enjoyed driving it though - when it was working it was excellent - also towed our large caravan very well (which may not have helped the clutch).
Submitted: 26/09/2008 10:42:41
![]()
A really nice car to drive.
Submitted: 26/09/2008 09:44:42
![]()
Sorry, I’ve not got mine yet, but felt the first review is truly unfair since at the time of the review the vehicle had not even gone on sale, let alone available for hire! All magazine road tests have been positive so far, so a 1-star is just plain stupid..!
Submitted: 19/09/2008 17:11:43
![]()
Awesome car, nicknamed ’baby veron’. Faster than Ferrari, Lamborghini, Zonda, Porsche & even the Bugatti around the notorious Nurberg ring. This car has the best 4wd system on the planet. 0-60 in just 3.3 sec. Say goodbye to your driving license.
Submitted: 16/09/2008 09:28:15
![]()
2.2 DCI SVE- What a fabulous car!! It really is a work horse. We have three children (one being a baby) and a dog... they all fit in perfectly. We pull a 23’ caravan all over the country and you don’t know it’s there. Plenty of torque and very comfortable. Avoid main dealer servicing though as its a total rip off - especially in Cardiff. They charge you for work they don’t do!!! Overall the vehicle is superb and definately buy another one. No problems with anything. Top car.
Submitted: 12/09/2008 10:28:56
![]()
If I could have put it, I would have put minus 1 star. The diesel engine is really under powered I feel like a snail going up hill and the design is basically just a shell with no interior design thoughts. One positive is its only a hire car and goes back next week.
Submitted: 10/09/2008 15:20:03
![]()
I have owned the vehicle from new, June 2006. I have found the engine to be very noisy. Under warranty the injectors have be replaced but it is still noisy. On the annual service this year I mentioned it again and was told after test that it was the norm for this engine. Disappointed. In May 2008 when we travelled down to the French Alps towing a 1500Kg caravan. On coming out of La Mure on the N85 the vehicle overheated within the first part of the climb I had to stop and let it cool down. On re starting the journey from stand still it only just coped, but I could not get out of first gear for the rest of the climb and had to stop a second time, overheated again. On the flat or lower grade mountain roads, for example on the A75 from Milau to Beziers it is OK. I will be get rid very soon but not for another X-Trail.
Responses to this review
The X-Trail is great, in my case since 2003. We must remember it is a car and not a tractor. Towing 1.5 tons is quite heavy I must say hence don’t blame the X-Trail - Jason Mochache from Cambridgeshire
Submitted: 10/09/2008 09:15:26
![]()
What a great car! I waited until I had a good number of miles under the car before posting. This car does just about everything. It seats seven, with the two rear most seats suitable for children (or small adults!). The boot space is massive with the third row seats folded (into the floor). It tows our caravan with such utter ease, that you can forget it’s on! We went for the Adventurer Auto, and the spec list is endless. While i wouldn’t describe the Pathfinder as a luxury vehicle, I would say you get practical luxury. The surfaces and colours are designed to stand up to real world use. This is ideal if you have a "real" family, as you won’t spend all day worrying about marking the interior. It’s not the quietest at very low speeds, but soon settles into a hushed cruiser. Fuel economy can vary greatly depending on type of use etc. Short brisk trips to the shops for example can see the needle dip. However, longer steady runs can see well over 30 mpg. This seems in keeping with most similar 4x4s. The Adventurer competes with all the other luxury 4x4s on spec list, yet cost so much less. Add the fact that it also retains its resale value makes it almost a non brainer for the cost conscious. We will buy again, with only two things on the future wish list. Better fuel economy (in light of the ever rising fuel prices!), and electronic suspension control to allow comfort when cruising and firmness when towing/off roading.
Submitted: 03/09/2008 12:47:38
![]()
Had the car 4 months, tows my 18ft caravan with ease, loads of space and great comfort , a bit noisy when pushed hard but once up to cruising speed its fine. 26/29 mpg, just does what it says on the box - great car.
Submitted: 21/08/2008 12:41:26
![]()
This car is the shame of the today’s automobile! Its behaviour in soft turns over 100km/h is a disaster and if you have a light side wind it can become really dangerous. In high speed, if the road is not perfect, its aerodynamic together with the soft suspension make your heart beat real fast. I have worked in car rental for years and driven almost every car and I can say only this: it’s the worst car in behaviour and not only in its category! Only Kia’s are worse and just then some of them. Car may be reliable and comfortable and but that’s not enough to make a car good.
Responses to this review
No idea what the previous reviewer is talking about. I have had a 95 model from new and it’s now pushing 70,000 miles. Never had any problems at all with it and it is stable at speed and in crosswinds. I have driven many other vehicles that do not handle anywhere near as well as the Primera - Andy Needs from Cardiff
I agree, I bought one out of Japan "used", doing about 18,000km. I drove the car to 70,000km with $0.00 in repairs, my only expense being the changing of engine and txm fluids. My average speed on the highway would be 160-180km/hr and the vehicle handled really well,and cornered really well. Maybe the driver that complained about the handling probably running on some crappy tyres. Other than that, his comments just don’t add up. My only problem with the unit is that I wished it had some more horses, maybe 225-250hp would have set me right - Dean from Trinidad and Tobago
Submitted: 14/08/2008 13:02:39
![]()
Unfortunately I don’t share the below opinions. I bought a 1.5 diesel for my wife and it is now back at the mechanics workshop just one week after taking delivery. This diesel engine is a bit of a nightmare. Great economy but very low on power. Nissan’s figure of 12.2 seconds for 0-100kph is simply a lie. I think 15 seconds at best. Also, after the first 500 miles, the engine starts to sound like a bag of spanners. When opening and closing doors, you need to treat it like paper as the noises and rattles make me fear that something is going to fall off at any moment. It must be Nissan employees putting on the previous test reports because if you look at the forums in Qashqai club, you will find that there are many angry owners out there. If someone offered me what I paid less five hundred quid to take the car now, I’d bite their hand off.
Submitted: 11/08/2008 08:45:19
![]()
New Nissan Cabstar 35.13 dropside 2008 model - really good truck, so far so good. Very bumpy on b roads when empty but stick some weight on the back and its like riding on a airbed. Very quick with lots and lots of power but engine has only done 60 miles. The computer reading is 28mpg running around with about 700kg on the back around town on short trips. It needs running in and I am expecting at least 30mpg....
Submitted: 11/07/2008 11:38:20
![]()
I bought the C+C when it was launched in the UK in January 2006. Having owned Micra’s for as long as I can remember. The C+C has just blew me away. I know that it cost me twice as much as my previous Micra’s but the quality was immediately apparent in everything about it, particularly the road holding and handling. Two and a half years on and I have just bought a 2008 model and it is even better. Well Done Nissan. The best sporty car ever produced.
Responses to this review
Paid £4200, yesterday, at auction for an ’06 C+C for my daughter (learner, 17) because the insurance was only £800 fully comp. and she liked it better than a Fiesta! Glad to hear it seems reliable and doesn’t leak too much - Aldo B from Renfrewshire
Submitted: 30/06/2008 09:19:22
![]()
Just 5 months old and I have a faulty starter motor, it was in the garage for a whole week. The interior may be well laid out, but it is so plasticky and so easy to damage, I have managed to damage the air vents, just by cleaning them! The body is also a let down, you can dent it so easily, nowhere near as tough as a van should be. So a BIG disappointment. I should have stuck to a Toyota!
Submitted: 30/06/2008 08:51:04
![]()
Excellent little car. Rides well, economical, good acceleration and brakes. One small thing, timing belt gone - £500 - nasty.
Submitted: 24/06/2008 16:20:50
![]()
Great little car but I’m not sure I’d rave about it being the best car I’ve ever had. For a 1.5D the engine is surprisingly good. It can be a little bit noisy but all in all very good. The Tekna comes with a few luxury items that I think are a must for this car. The panoramic roof is a nice gimmick and lets lots of light into the car making it feel extremely spacious inside, great for long journeys if you have kids in the back! To be honest, it probably wouldn’t matter to me if it had it or not though. The driving position is excellent and even though it’s such a tall car, it handles pretty well. I have had mine now for about 8K miles and so far it’s been up to the usual standards of Nissan as far as reliability goes and I really think this car will continue to run forever. Trim quality however is also to usual Nissan standards which is a bit disappointing. After such a short time I am having a couple of problems with the trim but they are all fairly minor. 1) Plastic surrounding driver’s door lock is loose. 2) Driver’s door mirror is a little loose so vibrates at speed. 3) Driver’s door hinge makes loud clicking noise when opening/closing . 4) Rubber stopper on inside of boot lid has come off. 5) Lots of rattles from parcel shelf (could be related to 4) 6) Rear seatbelt machanism cover has fell off. 7) Front fog-lights seem very very flimsy - be careful when washing! Besides these minor faults, the over-use of cheap plastic parts is a little bit worrying but much much better than the Dodge Calibre I looked at as an alternative. The leather in the Tekna also seems a little "plastic-y" but again at the price range I wouldn’t expect much else and it does seem to be quite hard wearing so far. Boot space is OK, but I also looked at the Kia Sportage which had a great flat folding seat arrangement allowing for masses of boot space (different class of car though) Although I have been looking at the Qashqai 2+2 and this seems to have a similar flat-folding seat arrangement. One of the strangest things about it is that it has turned more heads than any car I’ve ever had (and I’ve had a few exceptional cars) people just seem to be so interested in it. Almost anyone who passes it in the street seems to want to have a look inside! Not really surprising though as it definitely has some quirky styling. My verdict - good value, great family car but I do miss my old Saab. There’s definitely a market for this car but I don’t know if I personally would have another one.
Submitted: 16/06/2008 10:05:10
![]()
After having had two Ford Focus’s, I needed a change and what a change! Far better than the Focus, better for value, better to drive. Buy one!
Submitted: 28/05/2008 11:37:55
![]()
Bought used in 04 and proving very difficult to replace. Top spec, toy spec, whatever, I will seriously miss the rear view camera, the intelligent cruise control (can be used on the M1), the excellent sat-nav, never mind the xenon headlights, auto sensing mirror & wipers and other stuff that is more noticeable in day to day driving than hyper road hugging; only really useful if you own an aerodrome. In fact the minor gripe mainly felt is re the 17" wheels and their increased harshness over the speed humps and potholes. It has proved very reliable, very easy on the pocket, comfortable locally and on motorways, with spacious seating and load bay. And so I am keeping it longer than usual, surprised that newer cars of higher repute struggle to meet this ’02 spec.
Submitted: 28/05/2008 09:11:45
![]()
Just completed 2000 miles in my Tekna. Best car I have ever owned, if you can afford it go for the 2.0 with the glass roof and leather. I had test drives in Audi, Lexus and BMW but the Qashqai beats them all for comfort, styling and design. The car attracts admiring glances where ever I go and looks a premium car. 10 out 10 for Nissan.
Submitted: 21/05/2008 08:26:47
![]()
I agree with the comments on this site. The Qashqai is a cracking car and does what it says on tin. It is quite a heavy car and feels supremely solid and practical. Well done Nissan you’ve got yourselves a winner!
Submitted: 20/05/2008 08:43:32
![]()
I used to drive a Mini Cooper S, and wasn’t on the lookout for a new car until a colleague at work brought a brochure for the QQ in to browse (his missus had pointed one out to him in a car park and he’d decided to look into buying one for himself). From the moment I got to the page showing the panoramic glass roof, I wanted one. Within a week I’d checked out all the specs, read lots of reviews, test driven a 1.5dCi Tekna and ordered one! I pick it up middle of June and can’t wait!
Submitted: 19/05/2008 09:21:32
![]()
Ran a Vauxhall Meriva for many years and was very happy with it but fancied a change. The Qashqai seemed just right for me and my expanding family, and the interior space and ample boot room fits all 5 of the Sutton family with room to spare. Ride position is high, suspension very good. Cost price is very reasonable and left me with change from my budget. The engine is punchy, I went for the 2 litre rather than the standard 1.6 as I enjoy having the power to pull away and overtake when necessary. There are almost no negatives, if I had to be picky then I might say that the large pillars make visibility poorer than it could have been but this really is a small quibble. Everything about the Nissan Qashqai is well laid out practical and I would not hesitate in recommending it to family and friends.
Submitted: 06/05/2008 10:54:35
![]()
I fancied a change. I didn’t want a gas-guzzling 4x4 or an ordinary MPV and went looking for something "different". This was when my head was turned by the Qashqai, it is called a compact MPV and looks much better in reality than it does when looking at images online. Fuel economy is good (50+) and the CO2 emissions are only 145g/km which means it is classed as green. It also falls into insurance group 5 - not too expensive to insure. If you are looking for something a little different that gives a great feel of security for your family plus making family outings a pleasure rather than a chore then I highly recommend the Nissan Qashqai.
Submitted: 29/04/2008 10:43:46
![]()
This car was built to go up mountains, great big muddy ones at that! Fabulous off roader - if you’re looking for a 4x4 to dop the kids off at school then give this one a miss as ou’d be completely missing the point of this car. Amazing torque and can tow a house! Brilliant work horse and very comfortable interior with masses of space.
Submitted: 24/04/2008 12:54:02
![]()
I find this a very capable vehicle. It has off-road abilities but is just as nice to drive around winding lanes and suburban roads. Running costs are reasonable for a car of it’s size and the price for new is well priced. Comes well equipped and gives plenty of comfort and space for both driver and passengers. Highly recommended.
Submitted: 22/04/2008 12:16:04
![]()
Nice to drive BUT CANNOT recommend a car that needs new fuel pump for £2000 at 58000. Very common fault according to NISSAN dealer. Air flow meter, common fault £400 , new key £300 with coding. How can they charge these prices. DO NOT BUY unless you have deep pockets.
Responses to this review
I spotted an X-Trail in the garage the other day on ramps. Guess what? Fuel pump. The mechanic says it has to be a design fault as he has replaced 5 over the last two months; the part alone is £1600 and it seems to affect 2.2 dci engine. Please heed this warning and buy something else - Ian Garnham from Durham
Submitted: 21/04/2008 08:21:49
![]()
I learnt to drive in a Nissan Micra (many years ago!) and it looked nothing like this!!! Gorgeous car and very, very nice to drive. I also like the fact you don’t see many of them about, which think makes it a bit special. It is a very girly car so won’t appeal to everyone but I think it’s a real gem.
Submitted: 20/04/2008 21:51:39
![]()
For three years I previously had an X-Trail 2.2 litre sport six speed giving an average of 33 miles to the gallon. I looked at the new X-Trail in November 2007 when I was due to change but was disappointed to see they had reduced the cc to a 2 litre. As I tow a caravan the extra power is a must. The dealership were very good in that they checked to see if the old model was available and managed to supply a Columbia version with sat nav and cruise control and I can honestly say its as good as the previous one.
Submitted: 10/04/2008 08:51:11
![]()
I have had my K reg for four years and it has never failed to start regardless of the weather. It is reliable, economic and easy to maintain. Last year, I paid £200 maintenance for a 15 year old car, that must take some beating. I use the car every day and travel out of Birmingham in the car at least once a month and have every confidence in it to get me there and home again.
Submitted: 08/04/2008 13:35:31
![]()
Fabulous car. Really comfortable, Sat Nav and integrated bluetooth definitely worth it. Very smooth drive on motorway or B roads. I like the high driving position to!
Responses to this review
Hiya Cath, what is your 2 litre like on petrol? I have been given anything from 34mpg - 49mpg around town! Before I buy I would like an owner’s perspective if poss - Linda Mansell from Lancashire
32.4 - stays the same all the time. I do a mix of motorway and B road driving - Cath from London
You more than likely have water getting into your car or the A/C needs a service or you need to change carbon filter - John Walsh from Ireland
Submitted: 07/04/2008 09:57:35
![]()
Very reliable little car, mine is the 1000cc so not much power for acceleration, feels a little too weak on the motorway and the suspension is pretty rigid so you do feel the bumps and then some. However, I’ve had mine for 4 years now and not a single problem has developed, fuel mileage is good and the paintwork still looks very shiny and new. I’ll definitely buy another when I feel I can part with this one - it’s become a bit of a pet!
Submitted: 03/04/2008 08:59:36
![]()
I bought it at 7 years old with 57000 on the clock. A good drive and good supportive drivers seat. I have now done 204,000 miles and still going. Had a new clutch about 45000 miles back. Minor work on front suspension. All in all a brilliant car although the clutch has been rather stiff to use. The engine has only failed me once (this winter in damp weather...gave it a spray with wd40 and fine since) rear suspension now sounding a bit knocky on sharp bends. Will continue to drive it until major problems arise then sadly have to move on. All in all the most wonderfully reliable old car I’ve ever had...can’t really fault it
Submitted: 31/03/2008 10:26:59
![]()
Fantastic, best car I have owned, and that takes a lot for me to say as I am very critical when it comes to cars. I have covered 8,500 miles now. very reliable, economical, comfortable and certainly different from your average ford focus looking cars.
Submitted: 25/03/2008 10:25:12
![]()
I wanted a car to replace my VW diesel Golf, the qashqai 1.5 dci turbo diesel 104 bhp was the car i brought ,excellent fuel economy 55 m.p.g. plenty of power from this small but lusty engine, great for parking with a tremendous lock, it sits nice and high so you get all good round visibility. I just done 30,000 miles in this car and I can't fault it
Submitted: 25/03/2008 09:48:11
![]()
Totally reliable and I think a really nice cute looking car. Really nippy to drive over short or long distance and very comfortable. Excellent running costs and value for money. Wouldn’t be without mine.
Submitted: 15/03/2008 20:04:31
![]()
I wanted a car to replace my Primera. At first I dismissed the Qashqai and looked at Toyota, Ford and even BMW. However, one test drive and I was hooked. It’s so well finished, extremely comfortable, superior equipment levels, a great drive and economical. The versatility of the split seats and rear luggage space make it a proper load carrier too. The elevated driving position is great in traffic. Overall - an excellent car.
Submitted: 12/03/2008 10:16:12
![]()
Mark, below is a link to a news item that responds to the Nissan Navara safety rating issue and should help you.
Response to the Nissan Navara pick up’s crash test performance.
Submitted: 28/02/2008 11:20:34
![]()
Excellent car. Nice interior, good handling. Very economical and quite comfortable interior.
Submitted: 21/02/2008 09:21:16
![]()
Nothing but trouble from being 6months old engine immobiliser kept locking it self down new parts fitted still not solved problem sold it and got a Citroen
Submitted: 14/02/2008 10:56:47
![]()
Don’t listen to Jeremy Clarkson, I love my 350Z and it’s an early Model. Great fun ... superb looks ... and Top Gear Car of the Year (2004) Sounds Great too. Nice leather seats :D
Submitted: 13/02/2008 17:02:18
![]()
At first glance, the 1983 Micra is certainly an enticing prospect. The sporting driver is drawn to the sporty tyres and sizeable exhaust tailpipe and will not be surprised to learn that the 987cc engine packs a fruity 52 horsepower punch which is able to propel the Micra to a maximum speed of 94mph on a racetrack. The safety-conscious family driver will be pleased to learn that the Micra are equipped with 2 seatbelts in the front and 2 in the rear. After owning this car for 4 years (I waited for the price to drop before buying second-hand) I must say I’m thoroughly delighted with my purchase. The only significant downside is the faintly nutty aroma of the interior. I did briefly entertain the possibility that squirrels had built a nest (technically known as a "drey") in the dashboard but on inspection there were no squirrels present, just a small family of raccoons which I decided to leave in peace rather than evict and run the risk of being bitten. On further reflection, I suspect the aroma may be the fault of the (deceased) previous owner and I will be contacting his family in due course to request a partial refund for the distress caused by this unwanted fragrance. Nevertheless, this car comes highly recommended by me and the only reason I will sell is to upgrade to a 1986 Nissan Sunny I hope to import from Luxembourg in the summer. A step up in the luxury car world, I’m sure you’ll agree.
Responses to this review
I totally agree. My 1984 Micra had a suicidal deceased owner in it for 6 months or more, nobody knows, in his garage before I bought it and I couldn’t be happier as I bought it at a huge discount with low mileage, garaged car with its own family of rats [I like rats] from the family as they were going to scrap it. Mine’s called Bert and bits of him are still in the car. Some say it smells funny and the seats are a bit sticky, but it never bothers me or anyone else as I live on my own and the rats are a source of company. Who could ask for more apart from cheaper petrol as I now have to sell my organs and limbs and burn the floor boards to keep warm. They are even charging me now to go on my annual paid holiday to go seal clubbing in the Antartic. I ask you, I’m sure you will agree - Des Davis from Vale of Glamorgan
Submitted: 28/01/2008 11:48:19
![]()
My Note auto is a great car but fuel economy is pathetic now that winter has arrived. 27.8 miles to the gallon now if two of use go to town ... Its cheaper to get the bus ...
Submitted: 02/01/2008 15:54:56
![]()
Absolutely superb! An engine that growls on forever, tenacious road holding and so much power, the traction control struggles to keep it all straight every time in first and second. I have had no problems with the exception of a sticking throttle. That has not spoilt my enjoyment at all. It is a bit thirsty, I am getting about 24mpg and it is small insude but, it’s a genuine two seater sports car, your never going to move grand pianos in it anyway. If your in the "not sure wether to get one" league....get one.
Submitted: 02/01/2008 11:57:31
![]()
The Nissan Xtrail was a good car to begin with but two years on we are now on to our 3rd Turbo and have had to have the suction control valve changed. I would never buy one of these cars ever again.What a complete let down it has turned out to be. Once this car is back on the road we are going to get shot of it ASAP and get something more reliable. Luckily for us we are having the work done under Warranty but when we have to start paying they are talking £1,000 money we can’t fford to keep paying out...
Submitted: 17/12/2007 11:39:38
![]()
All round reliable van. Practical, well thought out lay out inside.
Submitted: 06/12/2007 09:16:19
![]()
Powerful, resourceful vehicle, it can get out of a tricky spot even when fully loaded. And it is the best looking pickup I’ve ever seen.
Submitted: 06/12/2007 09:13:38
![]()
I’m really glad I bought this car. It’s firm but not uncomfortably so and very easy to drive. Whilst it maybe slightly unconventional in looks it’s not ugly and it certainly has everything you look for in an estate car. Very comfortable and very spacious and reasonable to run. A very good car.
Submitted: 27/11/2007 12:28:21
![]()
Good on fuel consumption considering its a 4x4. Reliable too. Has all the extras you could want. Well thought out.
Submitted: 27/11/2007 09:20:19
![]()
This van has been a sound investment for me. I’ve been self employed since 2006 and bought this van second hand with only 15k on the clock and it has been an absolute workhorse for me and never let me down. A really sturdy van that is excellent to drive.
Submitted: 26/11/2007 15:27:13
![]()
Good space, large boot, good level of comfort. This isn’t the most exciting car I’ve ever driven but as a family car it is reliable, safe and gives good mpg.
Submitted: 22/11/2007 21:05:31
![]()
Wonderful car, just keeps on going without needing any attention. Best family car I’ve owned. I’ve had this from new and it’s never given me a single days problem. Solid and easy to drive it is also very comfortable and roomy. Excellent car.
Responses to this review
I agree with you! The best family car, my second - Franc Feri from Slovenia
Submitted: 22/11/2007 11:43:17
![]()
A good off-roader, it has coped for me with the rough terrain on my farm. It was a cheap alternative to the Land Rover Discovery and I’m pleased with it.
Submitted: 22/11/2007 09:20:24
![]()
Fabulous value for money, comes with leather interior, dvd-sat nav, rear parking camera, bose sound system (which is fantastic). Looks like nothing else on the road. Very comfortably seats our family of 5 and my boys just love it. The V6 engine is a joy but can be thirsty, but it’s well worth it for such a smooth drive. Really chuffed I chose this, we will be taking it on holiday to France in the spring and can’t wait to put it through it’s paces.
Submitted: 22/11/2007 09:00:29
![]()
Its a lovely car for me but a bit short on legroom if you are on the taller side. Decent price and fun to drive.
Submitted: 20/11/2007 16:44:11
![]()
Excellent 4x4. Proper off roader, grips well and handles brilliantly. Good solid, safe car and very flexible seating. Excellent value for money.
Submitted: 20/11/2007 14:43:20
![]()
Very underrated MPV. I bought mine second hand a couple of years ago and have enjoyed nothing but reliable and and comfortable driving. We’ve taken ours the length and breadth of Britain and also around Ireland a few times and it’s never let us down. The only downside are the rear seats, which would be a little more flexible if they weren’t so heavy to move! Great family car and available at very reasonable prices.
Submitted: 20/11/2007 11:04:59
![]()
I drive this van for a local garden centre that I work for and find it a very reliable van. It certainly drives well and can shift when it needs to, even with a full load. I would say that it actually drives better when loaded as the front suspension can be a bit lively when unloaded. The cabin is basic but comfortable and overall it’s a good work van.
Submitted: 19/11/2007 11:21:34
![]()
Excellent car, one of the most exhilerating drives I’ve ever experienced. The car handles beautifully and there’s enough grunt to let you know you’re driving a very a powerful car and yet the engine runs remarkably quiet. Excellent brake power too; very useful! Good standard kit and some nice extras on offer. The Sat Nav is a bit frustrating at times though, which is a shame. Other than that I can only think of good things about this car.
Submitted: 17/11/2007 15:03:04
![]()
If you’re going to get an X-Trail, get the diesel. The six-gear manual gearbox is a delight and I think it comes as standard. The ride is comfortable, visibility excellent. Corners well and the diesel engine is lovely and quiet when cruising. Great space, equipment and safety make this one of the best 4x4s, especially at the price.
Submitted: 09/11/2007 15:39:45
![]()
This is a great mini-MPV, sporty and spacious! Fuel economy? Great - over 40 miles to the gallon. The biggest plus point is the way the Note has been designed to offer clever storage solutions. The split-level boot is genius and there are so many little nooks and crannies that you are never stuck for somewhere to store your items. A very practical and efficient Japanese car, perfect cross between a supermini and an MPV.
Submitted: 07/11/2007 11:50:31
![]()
I am very pleased with my 1.6 Visia, it provides me with a comfortable ride due mainly to a good driving position. The cruise control and reversing sensores further enhance the quality feel and the reliabilty has so far not been called into question. Good inside space and the certainly feels safe on both A-roads and motorways. An excellent product from Nissan, well done to them.
Submitted: 06/11/2007 08:53:10
![]()
Plenty of head room in this car, perfect for people like me.. Nissan reliability also a plus but it is basically a slighty bigger Micra. Depends how tall you are.
Submitted: 01/11/2007 08:47:42
![]()
Proper girl’s car. Agile on the road and and spacious inside. Good size boot for all that shoe shopping!
Submitted: 01/11/2007 08:46:39
![]()
This is the ideal choice for a family 4x4. The new car price is within the reach of most and the reliabilty is exemplary. This is a comfortable ride with a great feeling of safety and solidity. Spacious, reliable and good value for money.
Submitted: 31/10/2007 16:23:19
![]()
What a car, bought this to placate my wife, who wanted something big enough for all the family, but small enough for her to handle and also not get too beat up about the green issues. Since buying this car, I have commandered for myself, as it is a complete joy to drive, has quite an angular look to it and is a bargain to boot. Highly recommend.
Submitted: 31/10/2007 15:05:21
![]()
I love it! This car is awesome & keeps hold of its value. Not the roomiest inside, but hey - it’s a sports car at a decent price! Well done Nissan.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 15:24:41
![]()
I love my Nissan note. A decent sized supermini with a reasonable price. Nice high driving position. Certainly my choice in this class. Would highly recommend it!
Submitted: 25/10/2007 14:18:57
![]()
I recently test drove the Adventura and whilst it intially ticked all the boxes I was looking for; space, comfort, off road capabilities, and has an impressive towing capability it feels sloppy to drive and is extremely noisy. On top of this the fuel economy is awful compared to other 4x4’s out there. A real shame as this could be a great car but too many things let it down.
Responses to this review
You’re missing the point here, it’s not a car and that’s why it’s so good at what it’s designed for to be a go anywhere over nearly any terrain vehicle. If you want a car buy an X5/XC90/M Class they ARE cars. No offence but I’m fed up with people complaining that a vehicle designed mainly for one purpose is crap at something else - Paul Mullan from Scotland
Submitted: 20/10/2007 10:33:28
![]()
Brilliant little van, perfect for deliveries and collecting stock for my florists shop. Very economical to run and a nice little drive. Looks very smart too. Very pleased with my choice of vehicle.
Submitted: 15/10/2007 11:13:32
![]()
The Nissan Qashqai has the feel of a premium 4x4 without the price tag or the hate, no one will believe that this car cost less than £25,000 or that it does 50mpg! Try it!!
Submitted: 08/10/2007 14:00:49
![]()
Perfect style and perfect handling! Suprising performance and economy from 1.6 engine! Only sound quality of the speakers is poor!
Submitted: 24/09/2007 09:48:34
![]()
I’m excitedly waiting to collect my first x trail sport, I had a test drive yesterday & am so impressed. The drivng position, easy handling, comfort & what really sold it to me ... the wonderful fuel consuption. I didn’t think I could afford to run a 4x4, but this is brilliant. I’ll report back when I pick him up ... I’ve called him Neville!
Responses to this review
Do you still have the X-Trail and have you had any serious faults? Also, mileage to date please? - Jim Ashcroft from Scotland
Submitted: 12/09/2007 09:48:15
![]()
Difficult to pronounce, easy to fall in love with. This car is so stylish and my kids absolutely love being driven to school in it. Great on short or long journeys. Haven’t found anything about it to dislike. Definitely value for money.
Submitted: 05/09/2007 11:41:16
![]()
So far everything has been reliable, and trouble free. Plenty of space for 4 adults to travel comfortably and very good on fuel consumption. Great car.
Submitted: 05/09/2007 11:33:46
![]()
What can I say? Not the most dynamic of cars, acceleration is not the quickest but as far as dependability goes there can not be many other cars that provide such piece of mind as my Micra. I've been running it now for three years and not had any problems worth mentioning. If you need a car that gets you from A to B regularly then this is a car that is worth bearing in mind. Reliable is the word that would sum up the Nissan Micra.
Submitted: 17/08/2007 09:00:39
![]()
The Nissan Navara may have a tough exterior yet the interior could not be more sumptuous to both driver and passenger alike. The Nissan Navara has been designed to take you and your cargo wherever you wish to go in style and comfort, whilst always being prepared for the unexpected. With safety an optimum consideration the Nissan Navara makes no compromise in any area ensuring that you can drive with confidence.
Submitted: 13/08/2007 17:02:32
![]()
Good little run about, never fails to start even on the coldest days. Cheap to run and for replacement parts. Easy to park. Good size boot considering it’s a little car. Suitable for any purpose. Bit slow to respond to accelaration but it is a smaller engine. Thats probably the only bad thing you can say about it.
Responses to this review
Sounds great, I’m thinking of buying one because I’ve heard people say such good things! The car I own now is a Vauxhall Corsa and I have had nothing but problems, so I am looking forward to purchasing a Nissian Micra! - Vicki Malpass from Staffordshire
Submitted: 24/07/2007 14:11:09
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |