Search

Honda road test reports and car reviews

On 24 September 1948 the Honda Motor Co. was officially founded in Japan. Honda are the second largest sleeer of cars in Japan.

Have your say!
Honda lease prices External Link
Honda new cars and nearly new cars External Link

Latest Honda road tests

Honda Jazz

i-VTEC HE Hybrid CVT - Freshened up for 2011, the enhanced Honda Jazz builds on the characteristics that has made the Japanese supermini one of the most popular in its segment. A new front, reintroduction of a CVT gearbox, improved magic seats and revised engine choices can’t disguise the fact that the introduction of hyb [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Jazz i-VTEC HE Hybrid CVT

Honda Civic

Si VTEC Manual - Honda seems to be inching towards the premium marques when it comes to quality of materials and engine performance, and the all-important diesel alternative is now up to speed. The Si we drove comes in at £18,270 on the road and this is very competitively priced when you look around at the competiti [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Si VTEC Manual

Honda CR-Z Coupe

GT 1.5 IMA - With the level of spec included on the GT and the performance technology provided; this is a more than reasonable on the road price tag. Given the economical capabilities of the car (56.5mpg combined and CO2 emissions of 117g/km) and the advanced technology within it, I would imagine that residual v [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda CR-Z Coupe GT 1.5 IMA

Honda Accord Tourer

2011 2.2 i-DTEC EX Auto ADAS - The Honda Accord Tourer is a familiar sight on British roads since arriving in its current guise in 2008. The family-sized estate certainly looks the part too, with a stylish appearance and confident stance – but it needs more than good aesthetics to win in a sector with several big fish swimming ar [...]

Road Test Reports Says 3.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Accord Tourer 2011 2.2 i-DTEC EX Auto ADAS

Honda CR-Z Coupe

Up until the Honda CR-Z came along hybrid-powered cars where the domain of the environmentally conscious, people very much proudly wearing their green heart on their sleeve as they disapprovingly looked at others having ‘fun’ behind the wheel of their sporty cars. However if hybrid-power is to bridg [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda CR-Z Coupe

Honda Insight

2009 - Honda is taking on the Toyota Prius with the latest version of the Insight, which is a huge advance on the original two-seater launched in 1999. The major selling point of the Insight is its hybrid powerplant, a petrol-electric unit that reduces CO2 emissions and provides a cleaner, greener way of m [...]

Road Test Reports Says 3 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Insight 2009

Honda Jazz

1.4 i-VTEC ES i-SHIFT - Looking for something to make the pulse race? Then move along. Looking for a well made car, easy to drive, with high fuel efficiency and low CO2 emissions? Then the Honda Jazz could well be for you. Honda’s smallest car might be low on thrills but it makes good sense in so many other areas. The old [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Jazz 1.4 i-VTEC ES i-SHIFT

Honda Civic Hybrid

2009 - The revised model of the Civic Hybrid is new for 2009, it utilises the same technology under the bonnet as the previous Civic Hybrid – in that it has a 1.3 litre petrol engine with IMA (the battery) - but has received a welcome face lift, giving it a contemporary look more in line with the Civic and [...]

Road Test Reports Says 3.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Hybrid 2009

Honda Civic

Championship White Civic Type R 2009 - The ‘normal’ Type R not good enough for you? Waiting for something from Honda to really make you excited? Well, this car might make you sit up and notice. The strictly limited edition Championship White Civic Type R for 2009 is in the main a standard Type R with the added benefit of a limited slip d [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Championship White Civic Type R 2009

Honda Civic

Type S - With the latest incarnation of Honda’s biggest selling model hitting middle age, the Japanese manufacturer has taken the opportunity to tweak its Civic range. The new 1.8 i-VTEC Type S has seen its front end altered to look more like the Type R, while the handling and ride have been tweaked to give [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Type S

Honda Jazz

A surprisingly roomy supermini, the Jazz is a great car to drive. Honda is not offering the cheapest supermini but the Jazz is without question a classy car to own. [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Jazz

Honda Civic Hybrid

The Civic Hybrid is a capable, economical car with inexpensive running costs. The fuel economy is impressive but the same figures are achieved by many diesels. The low CO2 emissions (109g/km) could be the area in which it wins over most prospective purchasers. [...]

Road Test Reports Says 3.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Hybrid

Honda CR-V

2.2 CDTi - The vehicle we tested was the 2.2 CDTi which makes up the majority of the CR-V sales for Honda in the UK. [...]

Road Test Reports Says 4.5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda CR-V 2.2 CDTi

Honda Civic

Type R - There are quicker and more comfortable rivals, yet few can match the £18,615 Civic Type R's engaging nature with the exception of the Ford Focus ST 500. But it’s the looks that do it for me; the space age design with raw power on tap makes the Type R a true hot hatch [...]

Road Test Reports Says 5 star rating Full Report
An image of the Honda Civic Type R

The Honda range

Honda Jazz

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 74 reviews )

Honda CR-V

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 40 reviews )


Honda Civic

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 37 reviews )

Honda Accord Saloon

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 15 reviews )


Honda FR-V

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 6 reviews )

Honda Logo

4 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 6 reviews )


Honda Accord Tourer

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )

Honda HR-V

3.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )


Honda S2000

4.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )

Honda CR-Z Coupe

4.5 stars - average customer rating
Average driver rating ( based on 2 reviews )


  Available on the App Store

Read real opinions: Thousands of consumer reviews on all major car and van models.
Make your voice heard: Submit your own consumer review about the car or van you drive.
Learn more

Road Test Reports App screenshots

Other people need your help

Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.

Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.

Have your say!

Submit your own review

Lease Buy

* Required

^ Back to Top

Honda consumer car reviews

The latest Honda driver reviews and road test reports. The views expressed in these consumer reviews do not reflect the thoughts and opinions of ReallyGoodDomains.com

Submit a Honda road test report

Margaret Leppard, Stirlingshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 2004

A great car that is used regularly on 130 mile motorway trips and locally. I love the seating position, visibility and tardis like interior. I was very happy until I too had my first problem this summer with the handbrake when parking on a slope and only just escaped going into a shallow stream. My husband finds the engine a bit ’busy’ at higher speeds.

Submitted: 17/01/2012 10:44:52

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Allison Maxwell, Worcestershire

Honda CR-V 2005

Be aware that the oil warning lights do not warn you if you are low in oil!!!! On boxing day our engine blew up while driving along a busy dual carriage way in Sussex with two small children, a dog and all our Christmas gifts. The bill is £3600 for a refurbished engine and turbo. Surely with such a normally great car, they should have warning lights when the oil is low?

Submitted: 13/01/2012 10:28:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Manuel, Israel

Honda Civic 2011

The rear plastic window (spoiler) of the Hatchback Civic gets burnt in the sun and loses transparency. I first noticed the signs after only 3 months on the road. I expect that it will get worse as time passes. This happened on my car and on ALL other hatchback Civics that I’ve seen.The local agent has so far ignored my complaints on the subject. They sent their expert to check on my complaint; he acknowledged that there was a problem and then I heard nothing more from them.

Submitted: 08/01/2012 14:11:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Nigel Robinson, Derbyshire

Honda CR-V 2000

The car was bought a week before my son was born in March 2004, we are now looking to change after 8 years due to the fact we need a larger vehicle and its age. We would have no hesitation in buying another C-RV as we have had no issues with reliability and other than general wear and tear no major repair bills. When we first bought it a friend said the engines were "bomb proof" this I have to agree. I would definitely recommend Hondas to anyone. If there is a small complaint it would be the noise generated at high speed, but other than that it’s been a dream to own and will be sadly missed.

Submitted: 04/01/2012 12:42:59

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Rob, Worcestershire

Honda CR-V ES 2010

 

This is a great vehicle! Practicality: In normal use, that is with the back seats up it has the biggest boot in class and with the sliding rear bench it’s easy to add a few inches to it when you need a bit more. Performance: I don’t know what people expect, automatics are always slower unless it’s an expensive multiclutch job. Get a manual and enjoy what is actually quite a brisk driver’s car. Tip: The Dunlop tyres Honda supply on the car are rubbish. Put Continentals on the car and enjoy the well controlled suspension and good turn in it releases. Value: The ES is a great spec, all you need is a decent TomTom sat nav. The 2010 interior fabrics, heated seats, upgraded USB music system, climate control, folding mirrors, headlight washers, 18" alloys etc., ect. It’s really all you need and the car looks chunkier, SUV-like with black lower trim instead of the excessive colour coded bits on the EX IMHO. Off Road: I wasn’t expecting too much, but I was wrong. No it won’t go up Snowdon, but it easily coped with the terrible Winter last year enabling me to travel at will with impunity. I even took it to North Wales in a blizzard and got a long way into the hills before knee high snow caused to to struggle. It’s very versatile for a car that you can chuck about happily the rest of the year-round too. I had an Accord before and I far prefer my CRV. Faults? The seats are not as comfortable as they should be and stupid gadgets like an electronic dipping rear view mirror are pointless on a high seated car with tinted glass. The gear change economy light annoyed me for a long time, but I learnt to ignore it. The boot hatch drips rain water down the back of your neck as you step under, but other than these points there’s not a lot else wrong.

This is a great vehicle! Practicality: In normal use, that is with the back seats up it has the biggest boot in class and with the sliding rear bench it’s easy to add a few inches to it when you need a bit more. Performance: I don’t know what people expect, automatics are always slower unless it’s an expensive multiclutch job. Get a manual and enjoy what is actually quite a brisk driver’s car. Tip: The Dunlop tyres Honda supply on the car are rubbish. Put Continentals on the car and enjoy the well controlled suspension and good turn in it releases. Value: The ES is a great spec, all you need is a decent TomTom sat nav. The 2010 interior fabrics, heated seats, upgraded USB music system, climate control, folding mirrors, headlight washers, 18" alloys etc., ect. It’s really all you need and the car looks chunkier, SUV-like with black lower trim instead of the excessive colour coded bits on the EX IMHO. Off Road: I wasn’t expecting too much, but I was wrong. No it won’t go up Snowdon, but it easily coped with the terrible Winter last year enabling me to travel at will with impunity. I even took it to North Wales in a blizzard and got a long way into the hills before knee high snow caused to to struggle. It’s very versatile for a car that you can chuck about happily the rest of the year-round too. I had an Accord before and I far prefer my CRV. Faults? The seats are not as comfortable as they should be and stupid gadgets like an electronic dipping rear view mirror are pointless on a high seated car with tinted glass. The gear change economy light annoyed me for a long time, but I learnt to ignore it. The boot hatch drips rain water down the back of your neck as you step under, but other than these points there’s not a lot else wrong with it.

 

Submitted: 20/12/2011 19:27:45

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Hicks, England

Honda CR-V ex 2.2 diesel 2007

Well it’s been a few momths now from my last review of this grest SUV. I can still say everything is fine with 95,000 miles on the clock. It tows my caravan very well. I do agree that the plastics in the cabin can be easely marked, but with care they should be fine. It delivers good mpg around 35-42. Yes, it’s not perfect, but what car is, but for a SUV it’s hard to find better in terms of reliability, build and comfort. I can recommend the CR-V as a great bit of auto engineering. Like I said before, it’s a Honda.

Submitted: 14/12/2011 09:52:19

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Brian, Ireland

Honda CR-V ctdi se 2005

I bought my CR-V at 3 years old and it is now coming up to 7 years, with 110,000 miles on the clock. A supremely reliable machine with good mpg, 35 to 40 and powerful enough for all round driving. Road noise is pretty bad on rough surfaces, but it is a small price to pay. I highly recommended this as a reasonably priced (second-hand) reliable family car. 4wd gives it some (limited) ability on rough tracks and gives added confidence in winter snow and ice.

Submitted: 09/12/2011 11:16:37

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Drennan, England

Honda Jazz 1.2 2008

The car is a fine example of a supermini and I love the deceptive space inside, but I have a big concern regarding the handbrake after I left it parked on a small hill and upon returning to the car I found it had rolled forward about 12 inches. Luckily I had parked tight to kerb. I now always leave it in gear when it’s parked. I believe others have handbrake concerns with the Jazz. Mine passed it’s MoT ok!

Submitted: 07/12/2011 10:14:03

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Allen Greenwood, Lancashire

Honda CR-V CDTi 2.2 ES 2007

I’m just coming up to 50,000 miles and the only non-routine maintenance has been an oil change on the rear diff due to juddering when reversing on full lock; this was done free by the local dealer, but note some dealers want to charge for this warranty work. The car has been extremely reliable and is economical for such a big bus, achieving over 40 mpg easily. The snow and ice over the last two winters never fazed the car; 4WD just cut in when needed. Niggles with this car are few and are minor: The clutch has started squeaking intermittently, some interior plastics can scratch easily, the centre arm rests are uncomfortable, but can be folded out of the way and you can get wind noise from front windows when there is a stong cross wind. The front windscreen glass is soft and scratches easily, mine has actually chipped, but this is a problem not just restricted to Hondas. Overall, this is a great car with decent performance. Based on my experience I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend this car.

Submitted: 29/11/2011 09:51:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Onur Arikan, Turkey

Honda CR-V 2.0 Executive 2007

I drove 3.5 years about 75.000 km.s. Very well built car. Lots of space, good vision, very comfortable and secure. The consumption is normal (not more than some of the other sedan cars). The performance is worse when compared to 2.2 litre diesel but satisfactory if you are not a fan of sport driving. Road noise can be heard but it is not very disturbing. The inside mirror helps a lot to follow the children at the rear seats. As a result, we were very happy with our car and decided to buy another CR-V. Only difference is the color!

Submitted: 18/11/2011 09:23:43

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Other people need your help

Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.

Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.

Have your say!

Pat, Australia

Honda Jazz 1.5 CVT 2004

Just sold our 2004 1.5 CVT Jazz after 7 years and 60,000km of ownership. A great car. I loved the interior space; you should have seen our two bullmastiffs sitting in the back! Now, are you ready for this? In 7 years of ownership we replaced one windscreen, one battery and one set of rear wheel bearings. You can’t complain about that! Would I buy another one? Like a shot, but sadly, Oz Honda gets its cars from Thailand now and that doesn’t attract.

Submitted: 07/11/2011 13:37:05

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mike426, Ireland

Honda HR-V 5dr 4WD SI 2004

I only recently got my HR-V and love it. I bought it for its space (to transport our Golden Retrievers ), its height off the ground and its 4WD capabilities after two bad winters of snow. I read other people’s reviews, both the good and the bad, but went with my gut instinct at the end. It drives very well and is pretty quiet when started and has a thoughtfully laid out design. My only regret is I didn’t buy it when it was new!

Submitted: 19/10/2011 10:16:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Panos Kiriakakis, Greece

Honda Jazz elegance 1.3 5mt 2011

I have my Jazz since 25/1/2011 and I am very happy with the car. It is very quiet inside and economical on fuel; 5.6l per 100 km inside town. The engine is very powerful in high rpm. It has exellent build quality with nothing creaking inside the car and everything is very well assembled. The brakes are very good with good sensitivity.

Submitted: 17/10/2011 10:23:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mick Shaw, Yorkshire

Honda CR-V 2.0 EX 2007

Owned 3 CRVs, and this was the first of a ’new’ shape. Plenty of space, good on fuel, but hated the ride. Honda had tried to make CRV handle more like a car than previous model and lowered ride height and stiffened springs, completely ruined ride quality so bad that I sold the car after 7 months.

Submitted: 23/08/2011 08:21:41

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Trudie Tearle, Gloucestershire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2008

The car was provided with a 45,000 mile service prior to being collected from the dealership. I wasn’t told that the brake pads were almost gone and the clutch was worn, I thought it was just a case of getting used to a new/different car and of course Honda don’t provide any warranty for wear and tear. To find out if there is a problem with the clutch they would have to tear the car apart which would only take 5 hours, after which if it was discovered that the problem was wear and tear then I would be responsible for all the charges. After forking out for what I thought was a quality used car to then be stung with brake pad and replacement clutch all within 4 months certainly doesn’t reflect well on Honda. I will never buy from a dealership again.

Submitted: 14/08/2011 12:48:17

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Sal Johnston, London

Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 2010

 

If you’re after something different and rare then the CR-Z is for you; it was for me. I wanted something which looked sporty and quirky, but would be pretty economical and the CR-Z fits all those requirements. The best bits are the looks and the spaceship "cockpit"; lots of blues, reds, and greens light up when you’re driving. Ok there’s not really any back seats, but for a couple then there’s enough boot space to pack up and head off to the coast for a couple of days. The only downside is that I thought if might be free of the congestion charge being a hybrid, but they seem to have changed the rules.

If you’re after something different and rare then the CR-Z is for you; it was for me. I wanted something which looked sporty and quirky, but would be pretty economical and the CR-Z fits all those requirements. The best bits are the looks and the spaceship "cockpit"; lots of blues, reds, and greens light up when you’re driving. Ok there’s not really any back seats, but for a couple then there’s enough boot space to pack up and head off to the coast for a couple of days. The only downside is that I thought if might be free of the congestion charge being a hybrid, but they seem to have changed the rules.

 

Submitted: 14/08/2011 12:42:59

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tom Callaghan, Lanarkshire

Honda Jazz 2008

A great car pity about the water ingress at the rear end, also mine has a dodgy drivers door lock, but I would still recommend the car. It is generally good on fuel consumption and it’s very roomy.

Submitted: 28/07/2011 14:34:10

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David, Gloucestershire

Honda NSX 1992

An automatic version of this car was my only transport for over 2 years. It drives like a limousine around town, is an easy car to commute in, but is like a jet fighter on the open road or track. Practical and reliable, mine’s done over 95,000 miles and brings a smile to my face when ever I drive it. It was my dream car when first launched, and it’s a priviledge to own one. Honda and Ayrton Senna developed this car to exacting standards and each one was hand built in a dedicated factory. It incorporates a lot of technological features taken from their F1 experience. A truely unique car that Honda have struggled to better.

Submitted: 16/07/2011 15:36:47

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Luis Diaz, Dominican Republic

Honda Logo 2001

Incredible. It is a very economical car achieving 55 kms to every gallon! A lot of space inside also.

Submitted: 16/07/2011 15:27:13

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Glynn Morris, Devon

Honda Civic 14i 2011

We’ve had to have new electronics on the transmission and it’s only done 3000 miles. Honda, Exeter, (who’s customer service is total rubbish) took two weeks the carry out the repair. From new we were achieving 33.5 mpg, but since the repair we are now getting 44.3 mpg. However, since the reapir to the transmission the gear change goes 1st, 2nd, 3rd then jumps to 5th before changing down to 3rd and yo-yoing back up to 5th. It’s all over the place! Having to book the car back in again, arghhhhh!!!! 

Submitted: 16/07/2011 15:12:41

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Vincent, London

Honda Accord Saloon 2.4 EX ADAS 2007

 

I love Hondas. It has to be said, because it may influence my comments! I have owned a Legend Coupe V6 2.7 Manual and an Accord Coupe V6 3.0 Auto. Going for a smaller engine was in part an attempt at getting better fuel economy, and I get that. Almost 43 mpg on a 1 hour motorway run, while retaining enough power for some enjoyable mountain driving. That’s also because this car, while still powerful (almost as much as the 3.0 V6!), inspires quiet cruising with the Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Keep Assist. Very relaxing, only a hush of wind noise, although road noise as always in the UK is a concern on some sections. Note that my car was purchased at almost 4 years old, from a Honda dealer, but had an unusually low mileage of 15.000 miles. Because of that it does feel a lot like a new car. An Accord with 50,000 miles may feel different, although Hondas age very well in my experience. The equipment level is stunning, the interior very well made in time-honoured Honda fashion. Nowhere near the gorgeousness of the old Legend Coupe, but a well put together car with decent to excellent quality materials. The ambience on-board is airy with enough sunlight, the only thing I regret is not having a bigger boot! It’s ok but nothing special, at 468L I believe. I tried sitting in the rear, it’s fine for two adults but would be cramped for three. I’m a musician and audio engineer, and find the standard audio system sonically amazing. A car is a very poor acoustic environment generally to start with, but the Accord gives a clear and crisp sound, and does not drown everything in an ocean of boomy bass. Can be loud too if you like that. The HPs under the rear shelf are Pioneers and I guess it’s the same all-around and I believe the head unit is made by Alpine. I was pleasantly surprised by that system. Overall, delighted with the car.

I love Hondas. It has to be said, because it may influence my comments! I have owned a Legend Coupe V6 2.7 Manual and an Accord Coupe V6 3.0 Auto. Going for a smaller engine was in part an attempt at getting better fuel economy, and I get that. Almost 43 mpg on a 1 hour motorway run, while retaining enough power for some enjoyable mountain driving. That’s also because this car, while still powerful (almost as much as the 3.0 V6!), inspires quiet cruising with the Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Keep Assist. Very relaxing, only a hush of wind noise, although road noise as always in the UK is a concern on some sections. Note that my car was purchased at almost 4 years old, from a Honda dealer, but had an unusually low mileage of 15.000 miles. Because of that it does feel a lot like a new car. An Accord with 50,000 miles may feel different, although Hondas age very well in my experience. The equipment level is stunning, the interior very well made in time-honoured Honda fashion. Nowhere near the gorgeousness of the old Legend Coupe, but a well put together car with decent to excellent quality materials. The ambience on-board is airy with enough sunlight, the only thing I regret is not having a bigger boot! It’s ok but nothing special, at 468L I believe. I tried sitting in the rear, it’s fine for two adults but would be cramped for three. I’m a musician and audio engineer, and find the standard audio system sonically amazing. A car is a very poor acoustic environment generally to start with, but the Accord gives a clear and crisp sound, and does not drown everything in an ocean of boomy bass. Can be loud too if you like that. The HPs under the rear shelf are Pioneers and I guess it’s the same all-around and I believe the head unit is made by Alpine. I was pleasantly surprised by that system. Overall, delighted with the car.

 

Submitted: 08/07/2011 09:39:24

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Cristian Lopez, Chile

Honda Civic Exs 2009

Good Brazilian-made car with fine fuel economy. However, it makes noises when you turn or push the brakes. Anyway, good looking car.

Submitted: 04/07/2011 09:18:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Richard Thorne, Sussex

Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5i V-TEC Sport 2010

Into my second year of a three year lease of this car and I’m still happy to climb into the driver’s seat in the morning. Love the little shark’s fin detail on the roof and the different hybrid drive setting that which allow you to change the car to suit the driving conditions. The interior is cool too and there is just enough room in the back and in the boot for us to take the odd short weekend away.

Submitted: 01/07/2011 09:49:54

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

William Starr, Guadeloupe

Honda Accord Saloon

Very good for kids.

Submitted: 20/06/2011 10:51:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tony P, Cheshire

Honda Accord Saloon Honda Accord S Type 2010

I have already owned the 2.4S petrol version and whilst the new diesel lacks the acceleration, the difference is negligible once you are on major roads at cruising speed. Fit out and spec is first class with so many extras coming fitted as standard. My only complaint is around the heating and in particular, the time it takes to de-mist the windscreen in winter. All in all however, a delight and as usual with Hondas, very reliable.

Submitted: 23/05/2011 10:01:40

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul Smith, Nottinghamshire

Honda CR-V 2.2 iDTEC 2010

This is our second diesel CR-V and we’re generally pleased with the ride, comfort and performance etc, but are suffering with a vibration at approx 1500rpm and noisy brakes. The dealer cannot detect any faults yet the one they loan us doesn’t have the same issues.

Submitted: 17/05/2011 14:31:36

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jane Nicholas, Carmarthenshire

Honda Jazz 2006

Love most things about the car, but handbrake is dangerous. Had a ’goodwill’’ replacement of calipers in April 2010. Less than a year later it needs new calipers again. I’m not prepared to pay. Honda won’t help because ’goodwill replacement parts are not covered by 12 month warranty’. Not much goodwill there! Do they fit sub-standard parts when they are paying for the repair themselves??!! I intend to take the matter further. Any suggestions welcome.

Submitted: 13/05/2011 10:16:42

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ruth Sheppard, England

Honda Jazz 2002

I bought my Jazz 3 years ago and was impressed by the fact that it is so roomy for a small car. I like the fact that the bck seats drop down to make a flat base. I easily put a fridge in it and there was still more space. However, I have recently discovered that it has a leak in the boot and this causes water to sit in the spare tyre space and the water is also under the passenger rear seat foot space. I didn’t realise this was common ’til my friend had the same problem. I note another reviewer has the same thing. I can never achieve more than 44.4 mpg so not sure whether that is average. I am mostly a short distance around town driver. I would say on the whole the Jazz ticks all the right boxes, just a shame about the water problem.

Responses to this review

Hi Ruth, I got the same car and it has the same problem. It’s leaking in the boot, can you help me? What did you do to stop the leaking? I have been with this problem for one  year now - Ahmed Mohamed from Lancashire

I also have the same problem. How’s the leak of your Jazz now? I just discovered mine recently and haven’t addressed the issue yet. TIA - Von Manzano from Philippines

I had my 2002 Jazz for six years now and I have the same problem with water in the spare wheel well and the car is always very condensated up in cold weather. Also could anybody give me any advice on why both door locks have seized up? The only one working now is the boot - Susan McShane from Lancashire

Submitted: 25/04/2011 10:03:55

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Doug, Warwickshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 cvt 7 2008

Have just tried the new cvt Jazz. The old one is better, the new one has more body roll (running the tyres at 40 psi improves the handling.) The old DSI will take a serious amount of revs, the cvt is smooth. This car comes after a Range Rover 4.0 auto and a bunch of motorcycles, it gets used hard but never abused, 29000 on the first set of tyres. Insignificant wear on the discs front and rear at 32000 miles, engine barely audible at idle and between 39 and 49 mpg. No mechanical problems, can fit 3 mountain bikes inside (only front wheels removed) I don’t know what the comments regarding the steering relate to, the car handles brilliantly, flat around corners even up to the point where the car is drifting. I can’t fault the straight line stability, maybe at speed in a cross wind, but what do you expect? It’s a small light car. Three years old and not a single rattle or squeak anywhere, whats not to like?

Submitted: 10/04/2011 21:11:42

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Liz McDonald, Renfrewshire

Honda Jazz SE 1.4 2008

Hand break is dangerous, doesn’t hold on hills. Steering is poor. very stiff and doesn’t self centre. Still in dealer’s waranty and they say that is just the way it is. Very disappointed. Have to keep it as can’t do much else.

Submitted: 10/04/2011 20:45:39

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mark Layton, England

Honda Civic 1.4 Type S 2011

No intention of buying a new car (just browsing!), when offered a test drive of civic 1.4 v tech type S. I was so impressed I purchased a new vehicle on return of test drive. This car punches way above its class. Driving around town it feels prestigious; put the hammer down it is exciting and fun to drive and quick for a 1.4. Fuel economy is excellent; well-done Honda I now have a car that looks good without the expensive road tax, fuel economy, and insurance burdens. This car is excellent for young and old alike who still appreciate a good looking car without the expensive and licence threatening traits of the more powerful types.

Responses to this review

Hi, what mpg are you getting on this car? - Glyn Morris from Devon

Submitted: 30/03/2011 15:01:31

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jong G, Nottinghamshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.2 cdti sport 2005

Bought my trusty Accord diesel (under protest) after two BMW 5 series and two 3 series. Spent the first 12 months grumbling that I missed rear wheel drive, BMW image etc, and then I noticed that I could get from A to B at a blistering pace, with excellent fuel economy and NOTHING went wrong. years later I am (for the first time) STILL in the Accord because with 136k on the clock it’s never been in to the dealers bar servicing and is just as fast, economical and comfortable as ever. I am going to be forced to surrender it this year due to company policy but am handing it onto my brother and checking out the type S. The most underrated business car in the UK!!!

Submitted: 27/03/2011 20:19:56

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Trevor, Yorkshire

Honda CR-V CDTi executive 2005

Bought the car new, was really impressed with the comfort and refinement. Had a few warranty issues, flat battery, air conditioning unit faulty, warped front discs, rear axle needing a double oil change. But that apart love the car, good MPG (36 average), great handling and prefer this model to the new one. Like the wet boot area, plus good for our dog. Had to have the clutch replaced at 48k due to the pressure plate being faulty. It’s a known fault. Car still looks and drives like new, will be keeping it for a while longer.

Submitted: 08/03/2011 21:30:32

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Gordon Cooper, Hampshire

Honda CR-V 2ltr petrol 2006

We’ve owned our 56 plate 2.0 petrol CVR since 2008 and it’s now covered 33k miles. The car fits all our needs with two young children, so plenty of storage space for weekends away. Very pleased with build quality and I’m convinced that the CVR is bomb proof. Even main dealer servicing is reasonable. Our only concerns are the cars complete lack of power when laiden with wife, two kids and luggage. On long journey’s the CVR averages anywhere between 23/25 mpg, this despite cruising at no more than 75mph. Other than the above, we’d certainly consider another CRV when a replacement is warranted, though a diesel is most likely.

Submitted: 02/03/2011 15:59:12

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

N Hatcher, Cambridgeshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.0i V-tec Sport 2003

This is a faultless engine with nothing but wear and tear replacements for over 5 years. It is okay for economy giving about combined avg of 30mpg when using it like labelled (sport)! Not the fastest to justify the ’sport’ tag but I am sure it will please all those coming from the hot hatches. It looks good both external and internal with some nice extras and a good stereo. Handles well on corners and has power only when using second and third gears. Personally, I’d save a little extra and get the BMW or Audi. This is a little cramped as a four door saloon competitor but mechanically superb.

Submitted: 23/02/2011 09:56:47

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Shaun, Devon

Honda Jazz Automatic 2007

Good little car with more space than you may think. However no one mentioned the leaks, I have a water leak in the back, as a result the tyre well and rear foot wells have been soaking up water for some time The constant wet dog smell in the car was the give away. Also found that the rear window washer pump has gone at a cost of £75 to replace.

Submitted: 19/02/2011 21:33:43

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Q Jones, Hertfordshire

Honda Civic 2.2 i-CTDi 2008

Bought this car 3 years ago because it promised more grunt than my old 1.6 petrol civic, better fuel economy and more space. It has delivered on counts: smiles, savings and practicality. Acceleration is fairly spongy, perhaps due to turbo lag or software induced delay to meet emissions targets (achieves 135 g/km CO2). This can be forgiven because sooner or later you will find the time to stay in gear, and use all the torque tearing away uphill at 2000 rpm. Economy is as billed: 60 mpg @ 65 mph, or if you prefer to thrash around then 44 mpg is about as low as it goes. Only fly in the ointment has been reliability. I received a letter in the post telling me that my car wouldn’t start after my holiday - and it didn’t. Still, not all manufacturers gave written warning in advance of failure. Software defect caused too much current drain when unused for 3 weeks. Secondly, the right-rear shock failed. Both issues were fixed very quickly under warranty - no stress. Try it if you like cheap thrills.

Submitted: 04/02/2011 21:28:20

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Andrew Beaumont, England

Honda Accord Saloon Accord 2.2 TDCI 2010

This is my 3rd Accord and the new model is a delight in every way, it feels like a large premium car. I am having one persistant niggle, the cabin suffers from wind noise around all the door seals, the garage have assured me this has recently been brought to Honda’s attention and when enough customers complain a recall will be effected. It’s a real nuisance and spoils an otherwise thoroughly great car. The seats are a revelation in comfort.

Submitted: 28/01/2011 08:41:48

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul Bird, Lancashire

Honda Jazz 2009

I’ve found my Honda Jazz great but the dealer sold me a car owned by someone else when I stipulated I wanted an ex-demo car owned by them. The car is ok, but the after care service is zero, they won’t even answer my phone calls. I would never go back to Honda again.

Submitted: 21/01/2011 22:42:27

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Roy Dutton, Cheshire

Honda CR-V ES 2007

Bought my car new (57 plate), it has now done 30000 miles on the same set of tyres which have 4mm left on them. I get 40mpg driving 7 miles to work and back, and 44 mpg on an uninterrupted motorway run. Towing my 1300kg caravan, it returns 30 mpg at 50mph and 28 mpg at 60mph. It is comfortable, good to drive and has only been back to the garage for a service. I have considered exchanging it for the new one but as there is nothing wrong with it, my wife thinks it would be a waste of money and I think that she is right. Next year perhaps!

Submitted: 14/01/2011 22:10:21

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Joseph Roberts, Lancashire

Honda CR-V 2006

No complaints so far, 36,000 miles plus on the clock. Do not want to change. Smooth and reliable, summer mpg 40, winter mpg 35.

Responses to this review

Super vehicle but fuel a disaster - lucky to get 25 mpg and thats ex urban. Auto petrol but garage said 32 mpg on average. Is this normal? Christine Hill from Yorkshire

Submitted: 18/12/2010 15:39:44

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Alan Wingrove, Lancashire

Honda CR-V ES 2010

Here we are 7 months into ownership and unfortunately all I can say regarding this car (which I have tried to get used to) is that it’s certainly not gone up in my estimations. Just been out, cleaned the windscreen with the wipers and now have 2 very nice scratched arcs right across the drivers side!. This is the 2nd time the windsreen has been scratched in the normal day to day running. Anyone else having problems with a "fragile" screen....certainly never had this problem with the old HRV in 11 years. Goodness knows what state the screen would be in if I had scraped it with an ice scraper the other week, luckily I’m retired and don’t need to get out early anymore. I can only say maybe the figures speak for themselves when I say 7 months on and I haven’t even done 4000 yet...it may clock that up taking it back to the dealer for a trade in. Very dissappointed in the CRV. I mean you should’nt be nervous to put the wipers on with a nearly £25k car should you? Because after tonight I certainly will! Nor trying to overtake something on the motorway...see earlier review.

Responses to this review

OK... OK I know this is the 3rd time I’ve been here in this "love - hate " relationship with the CRV!! So I now have a new windscreen fitted... a superb job I may add. I am using this "milestone" as a complete new beginning with the car... This w/end a good friend of mine maybe hit the nail on the head! He said "you were in love with the HRV... you had it for 11 years!" His take on the CRV was yes absolutely being an auto it did seem slower and much heavier BUT safer. When you do boot it it does overtake confidently, so now that he agree’s my original point in that it’s slower (as did another reviewer here regards acceleration). I am happy that the CRV is a different animal from the HRV and therefore am willing to call a truce and call the CRV (in his words) a mini Limo... I now have to start enjoying the car instead of comparing it. So if you are thinking of getting a CRV don’t please take my previous postings as a review... it was me going through a period of adjustment. I think me and the CRV may get on after all!! Alan Wingrove from Lancashire

Agreed - I’ve got a 2007 2.2 diesel CRV and am also very disappointed with the fuel consumption. The car is driven daily on dual carriage ways for approx 20 miles but I’m barely getting 34mpg, whereas I should be getting towards 50mpg. The dealers are not interested. I would not advise anybody to buy a CRV if they are seeking economical driving. Any suggestions on why the consumption is poor would be gratefully received! Nij from Leicestershire

Submitted: 15/12/2010 19:37:41

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Michael Gower, Bedfordshire

Honda CR-V EX 2.2 manual Diesel 2008

This could be a superb car for the family and in particular for towing a Caravan. I purchased My 2.2 manual Diesel 2nd hand from an employee at the main dealers here with 16K on the clock, full service history and 2 years left on the warranty. The engine knocks like a bag of nails first thing in the morning and is also noisy during low gear work in the town. The MPG is a joke... they claim 50+ for extra urban. All I get is 35 if I’m lucky and less than 20mpg when towing our small van! The Dealer will not do anything to help and I’m going to have another go today. The knocking sounds very mechanical to me as it does reduce as the engine warms up. I’ve been in engineering long enough to know when something doesn’t fit. But the dealer says it is a "characteristic" of the engine. I’ve yet to come across anyone else with the same problem. Anyone out there got the same problem?? The rest of the car is good particularly the satnav which navigated us around France this year with no problems. But I agree with others, the voice recognition system for the phone is real pain. There are quite a few pages of commands to remember to operate the thing.... you would need a photographic memory to remember them all. As I said at the beginning... It COULD be a good car!!

Submitted: 07/12/2010 19:15:37

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jazz Nasim, Sussex

Honda Civic 2010

The Honda Civic has long been a bread and butter car for Honda, the typical C-Segment mainstream family hatch that would sell in strong numbers due to it’s reputation as a solid, dependable and practical runabout that fulfils the needs of a young family. But as we all know, once you have dropped the children at school and have no more bread and milk to pick up from the nearest supermarket, sometimes you like to have some fun. Which is why it has become important that mainstream cars have well balanced chassis and responsive steering all designed for an engaging and enjoyable drive, as demonstrated by Ford’s bestselling Focus, which showed that family hatchbacks can also be fun to drive. For other drivers they sometimes want to take it to the next level, and have a family car that is able to double up as a true performance toy for the weekends. That’s why the hot-hatch was spawned in the 70s, and has been such a popular sub-breed of family hatches ever since, with various GTi/RS/Sport variants of all the best selling Corollas/Golfs/Civics/Focus/Astras. New for the twenty-first century, welcome the Uk/European spec Civic Type R by Honda. Red H badges, a sporty bodykit and bigger, more aggressive 17 inch alloy wheels mark it out over standard Civics. Honda have removed sound deadening, added a sharp 6-speed gearbox, uprated the brakes and suspension, added sharper steering responses and thrown in a screaming 2.0 ’K20A’ i-VTEC engine. This served up a healthy 197bhp of revvy power which meant that the Type R could accelerate from 0-60mph in just 6.8 seconds and run on to 146mph. And that’s after dropping four passengers off and emptying the boot of a week’s shopping. Not bad at all. On the track the ’CTR’ really shines in dry conditions, with a well set-up chassis that can swing it’s backend out over tight corners and really responds well to the driver’s commands. It feels crisp and alive and is a pleasure to drive fast. The engine needs to be worked hard and revved but it rewards the driver by feeling so urgent and so willing that it is never a chore. Downsides? On the road the harder suspension set up means it is a bit jiggly on the motorway and the lack of sound deadening means it isn’t the quietest cruiser in the world, and in the wet weather it does often spin it’s tyres when applying the power, but for what it’s worth, the CTR is certainly one of the front-runners of the hot-hatch class and an excellent example of practicality and fun wrapped up in an affordable and desirable package.

Submitted: 05/12/2010 13:20:49

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Rome Rodriguez, United States of America

Honda Jazz 2008

Good car to own. There are some expensive dealerships so do your research first. The roomy interior is the first thing that caught my attention. Though not the best steering, it is easy to maneuver. This is thanks for the under-the-hood upgrades like the axle assembly.

Submitted: 30/11/2010 20:51:15

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Michael, London

Honda Civic 1.8 vti aerodeck 1998

Best car I ever had, never let me down in three years. Bought with 100k, now is 137k I didn’t do anything except changing all belts and fluids at the begining, and change oil every 7,500miles; all servicing carried out by me. I haven’t change brake pads yet, still ok. Great car.

Submitted: 18/11/2010 10:33:01

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mike Jones, Gwynedd

Honda Accord Tourer Type S 2003

First the good points: 120,000 on the clock and still a delight to drive - performance, gear change, handling, comfort, accomodation - would all gain 5 stars. Unfortunately the bad points drag down what would have been a very good car. After too many years of Ford ownership with all the negative connotations of unreliability and poor dealerships, I was really looking forward to an improvement in these areas. But: Air conditioning system required a replacement clutch under warranty and then when out of warranty the compressor seized completely, stranding my wife due to the fan belt melting. The replacement cost of the compressor and associated parts and labour would have meant a repair bill greater than the value of the car. Alloy wheels corroding - one new set under warranty - replacement set just as bad as the first. Tailgate motor replaced. Alarm main module replaced three times - alarm kept going off in heavy rain or hailstorms. Suspension bushes clunking after 50,000 miles - no, I don’t tow and the majority of miles are with one up and a laptop. New battery required after 2 years - the (non-Honda) replacementhas lasted for 5 years so not my usage at fault. Rear brake calipers, both replaced, again just outside warranty To cap it all, snooty local main dealer who believes in the invincibility of Hondas and that I’m just imagining problems. I wish these companies would tone down their advertising. This is the car that was launched with the slogan "Isn’t it nice when things just work". I don’t know, because it doesn’t "just work". They raise peoples expectations without the substance to correct their misplaced optimism.

Responses to this review

I know exactly what you mean, I have an ’03, had it for 6 yrs and it has only done 54k. A great car to drive, it’s my 5th and very last Honda, nothing but bother. The build quality has fallen away dramatically. So much for the Japanese building the better car. I’ve owned Hondas with 90+k on the clock and never spent as much on them as this one - I had the 17" alloys replaced, same as you, two drivers’ door window motors, tailgate motor, suspension parts, water leak in the boot... etc etc etc. I don’t know what Honda are thinking but they won’t have me buying another. I know what you are thiking - "Why do I still have it?" Simple, it drives great and looks good, but it just drives you mad when things go wrong that you know should not happen to a Honda and your right Honda think that you have no right to complain, they think the Honda brand is perfect. Well, wake up Honda, because you are not, in fact far from it. At least its nice to know I’m not the only one that sees their faults - John G from Scotland

Submitted: 12/11/2010 22:19:03

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jim Paton, Perthshire

Honda Civic 2007

Great car to drive, disappointed in garage Grangemouth Phoenix Honda. I had car 5 weeks drop link went, not covered in warranty (wear and tear). I replaced air filter, oil filter and oil and front brake pads within 2 months. On complaining I was told the car had a 30 point check before I bought it. Now after 55000 miles the clutch has burned out and guess what its wear and tear not covered in warranty. Guess who won’t be using Phoenix Honda Grangemouth again?

Responses to this review

Hi, your car is covered by Honda Happiness Warranty, a guarantee for 12 months, check Honda’s website - Todd Smith from Argyllshire

Submitted: 10/11/2010 21:22:36

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Scott Stevenson, Angus (Forfarshire)

Honda CR-V 2010

This is my second manual CRV, the previous one being a 2007 EX diesel. It has improved a bit with regards cabin noise and looks. Some small changes inside as well are welcomed. Hopefully the plastics inside will wear better. The new diesel is smoother and doesn’t seem to mind what diesel it gets as it doesn’t knock the same as the old one. My big gripe is that the handling is now awful. It has been softened and sits about 2 inches higher than the 2007 model. It rolls into bends and under steers due to the soft suspension. On undulating roads the motion is very annoying, like being on a gently rolling boat. This really spoils it for me. I cant wait to get shot of it, a real shame as in every other way its better than my 2007 model. It has lost the car handling and is now more like a freelander or discovery. Ive had a few quality issues, the paint on the B pillars was poor, the external door trims sat out about 7mm and at 2500miles it has a clutch judder. After 13 Hondas this one is poor. Dealer back up has as always been very good, but should not be needed for a 4 month old car.

Submitted: 01/11/2010 22:10:31

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Reg Kelly, Vale of Glamorgan

Honda Jazz 2008

Good car but problem with parking brake. Ours has run backwards as have Jazz models of several friends.Honda checked our car and made a few adjustment (for which they charged.)

Responses to this review

I also have a 2008 Honda Jazz and it let me down very badly with handbrake failure on a steep hill in traffic. Very scary! Took it into the Honda dealer who tightened the brakes no charge, but this had not cleared the fault and the car still rolls with handbrake still on. Get no response from Honda apart from trying to tell me how to drive. On telling them I am experienced and know how to drive on hills they have not responded! Am taking the car back to the garage tomorrow... Marie Pugsley from Sussex

I have Honda Jazz (54) Automatic 1.4 CVT. It is now over 6 years old but since it was new I have complained about the handbrake to the Main Dealer. The brake is ’adjusted’ at least twice a year, improves for a day then it is rubbish again, fortunately being Automatic not so hazardous on hills, although I park on steep sloping drive. From the reviews I have read this is not an isolated problem - Lynne Smith from Gloucestershire

Traded in a Civic for a 57 plate Jazz Sport. I do agree about the parking brake problem as my car rolled down our driveway as a wee girl was going by on her bike. Luckily we were in the car at the time and managed to stop. Complained to Honda and all they did was put it through a roller test mahine which they use for MOT testing and it PASSED. I got the handbrake cowl replaced twice as it broke when trying to park. My friend is a mechanic and he said to me that the only way to resolve the problem is to replace the handbrake cable. Failing that it is quite possible that the car is too heavy for this type of braking - Steven Hutton from Lanarkshire

I have exactly the same handbrake problem. The car rolls backwards on hills. Despite having it adjusted, the problem returns. I have also had two recalls on the car in two years for faults with window controls and lights. Very disappointing. This handbrake problem seems quite serious but I’ve found Honda to be a very inefficient company. I’d never buy another - Kelly Jones from England

On my 2008 Jazz, I have a potentially serious problem with the car rolling forwards without warning. Honda know all about this established fault with the Jazz but presumably think that if they ignore it long enough customers will give up in defeat. It is not safe to leave your Jazz parked in neutral with the handbrake firmly on. Funny how you don’t see this fact mentioned much in the sales literature. Honda need to address this problem and recall - G Stafford from England

Submitted: 29/10/2010 21:14:24

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mark Williams, England

Honda Civic 2.2cdti SE 2007

Opted for ’reliable’ Honda from new, at 22,000 miles required new clutch and temp sensor, repaired under warranty. Now just over 3 years old and 42,000 miles, requires another new clutch; slipping between 2000 - 4000 revs in 4th 5th and 6th gear, no longer covered under warranty and expect to get little change out of £1000, not what I expect from Honda! Also 2 new swing arm bushes had to be replaced to pass MOT (previous Renault had done in excess of 70000 still on original clutch and only ball joints were replaced at about 50k miles), will not consider buying another Honda, wished I had opted for my second choice German car or even another Renault.

Responses to this review

I agree with Mark, just got rid of my Civic due to clutch problems again! Totally lost faith in the brand - Carl Thompson from Leicestershire

Submitted: 26/10/2010 21:52:18

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Karen, Yorkshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2004

Great car to drive but watch out for expensive dealers. Got mine new and it’s now done 80,000 miles. Problems I’ve had seem very familiar: rear discs corroded within a year (replaced under warranty); gearbox bearings replaced at 65,000 miles (£390 at independent gearbox specialist); nearside rear wheel bearings have just been replaced (independent mechanic, £165, this is a whole unit, he normally expects to charge £50 for this job). Apparently in December 2009 Honda issued a Technical Service Bulletin extending the gearbox warranty on 2002-2008 models (manual) and will strip and replace the bearings. Unfortunately this came a few months too late for me and other Jazz owners who were clogging up forums with the same complaint (I phoned Honda at the time and they didn’t want to know). Also water gets into the spare wheel well in winter - I’ve heard Honda will replace the rear door seal for free as it’s faulty so will be looking into this. Overall a good car to drive but with some expensive flaws Honda are slow to do anything about. Beware if you’re buying second-hand as they’re not cheap and you might be about to encounter these problems.

Submitted: 25/10/2010 22:11:44

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Andrew, Perthshire

Honda CR-V 2.2 i-CTDi EX Auto 2010

I have had the CRV for about 2 months now and I can say that it is OK. It isn’t exactly brilliant but, I’ve driven worse. It is a little bit slower than the Accord that I’ve replaced but, as a result, it is slightly more economical than the Accord. I agree with the other reviews about the automatic transmission, it is a little bit sluggish to respond to the ’kickdown’ but pressing the sport button on the shifter actually solves this problem (to a degree). By doing this, the mileage can and probably will drop from 48 mpg to about 25 mpg (20-22 mpg if you are very vigourous with the loud-pedal). My only real issue with the car is the high ride height; it is very disturbing when there is a slight crosswind as it feels as though the car may roll over at any given moment. All-in-all, it is a good car but it has its issues. I would recommend it to anyone looking for a cheap 4x4. But, in my opinion, if you want a real 4x4 it is probably best if you bought a BMW X5, an Audi Q7 or (if your budget will allow it) a Land Rover.

Submitted: 12/10/2010 20:21:28

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Handley, England

Honda Civic ES I-CTDI 2007

Good performance engine and good reliability, However suffers for practicality. The major issue is the very poor visibility, you have very poor visibility out the back (no rear windscreen wiper doesn’t help) and the side mirrors have very sizeable blind spots. Thankfully I don’t have to drive in town as I would be very worried if my route was shared with a lot of cyclists, and I have had a number of worrying close near misses with other vehicles. Minor additional irritation is that the driver seat does not lower, so if you are slightly above average height you will enter work with you hair vertical from static.

Submitted: 09/10/2010 21:01:17

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Chris Moore, Switzerland

Honda Accord Tourer 2.0 Manual 2005

Reliable car with precise gearchange and steering. Good air conditioning. A pillars are large and block visibility in bends. Enough power for every day use but can feel underpowered when loaded.

Submitted: 22/09/2010 20:36:18

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Syd Taylor, Staffordshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 EX 2010

When you put one of the most refined little engines into one of the most cultivated bodies that is clean and attractive - though not particularly memorable - and when you ensure that all subservient systems from the ’snickety snick’ gearbox to the precise steering and compliant suspension have been designed to perfectly complement each other - and when you make absolute provision for the driver to be in total control, yet totally at ease along with fellow passengers, you have produced an excellent small car. That is what the Honda Jazz is; and that is how it was created. The essential character and quality of any complex piece of machinery is, of course, frequently mislaid by ’improvement’ or ’refinement’ - especially when the economic pressure of the marketplace demands cost cutting at every turn - but I’m pleased to report that the new Jazz meets, as ever, those self imposed stringent standards of detail design, construction quality and integrity to make it one of the best small cars. And an outstandingly useful feature, which reflects the ingenuity of Honda’s designers, is the way that rear seats fold flat in an instant to give a van-like facility. There’s none of the nonsense of tugging and pulling or shuffling seats. You just release two catches and.. Hey Presto! You can load it up as if you are ’white van man’. Honda engineering standards are well known for being top notch - and, for example, as one who has worked on many a Honda motorcycle engine - I can tell you that quality and precision are the marks of the marque. The latest version is now better looking but still retains all the qualities of the previous model. The Jazz range starts at £10,990 and rises to £16,620. There is a choice from two petrol VTEC engines in either a 89bhp1.2 or 99bhp 1.4 capacity and specification variants range from the fairly basic S to the sooper dooper luxury EX (Tested here with the 1.4 engine and manual transmission) - not forgetting, of course, the Si which purports to be a ’sporty’ Jazz: completely at odds, I suggest, with the very concept of this Honda which is well established as a car for the genteel and definitely not for members of the deranged ’Go Faster Battalion’ who used to drive flashed up Vauxhall Novas in their yoof. And so, as I threaded the Jazz through the congested network of streets of Gotham City with consummate ease, I delighted in the comfortably light steering and generous field of vision. Where the Jazz excels is the smoothness and easy feel of the controls: gears are creamy, pedal pressures are light and brakes are progressive and strong. These attributes make it a lovely car to drive. Away from the strictures of city life, a brisk dash along more demanding twisty roads revealed a crisply competent car with fluid and elegant handling; but a slightly jiggly ride (curiously, despite the compliant suspension over rough roads). Throughout the range, performance is measured and mannerly rather than inspiring and on motorways speed can drop considerably on long inclines - and at high speed it is not a particularly quiet car when compared to some rivals. Nevertheless, this little Honda is the epitome of creamy smoothness and sophisticated ’delightfulness’ for those who just want a magic hassle free ’do everything we want with minimum fuss’ transportation podule to match their quiet and respectable lifestyle in Acacia Avenue. Of course, being a wicked motor journalist it was my bounden duty to explore the extremes of the envelope. And so, in the interests of truth, justice and etc., etc... I found that top speed was about 113mph. (Readers will surely rest easy knowing that this was achieved whilst driving over a cliff and well away from public car parks). And for cost conscious readers, I’m pleased to report that no matter how much your correspondent used his spurs, fuel consumption never dipped below 40 mpg. Overall, throughout the test, 52 mpg was achieved. I can tell you now that had Aunt Maud been driving, 60 mpg would not have been out of reach. So there we have it. Dare I say that maybe - just maybe - the Honda Jazz is the ’best’ small car in the world?

Submitted: 09/09/2010 23:07:37

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Stockport, England

Honda CR-V 2.2CDTI ES Nav 2009

Bought CRV 2.2CDTI new in Oct 09 and am generally very satisfied with the vast majority of equipment, quality and operation of the car. BUT why does no-one ever mention the flaws of the car? There may only be a couple of issues but they are both infuriating. The first is the the voice recognition software which operates the hands-free phone, satnav, radio, heating and climate control in the car. Voice recognition - thats a laugh - you might as well try speaking in Esperanto as it will probably recognise this better than English. OK so with all the peripherals the answer is easy - just don’t use it and resort to pushing buttons or touchscreen but you simply can’t do that with the telephone. Unlike some systems which will display the telephone’s phonebook on a touch screen the CRV doesn’t so it’s voicedial or nothing. After about ten attempts to get the system to recognise a name or number it is usually much safer and easier to pull up at the side of the road to make the call. The system is so frustrtaing it can distract you and be downright dangerous. My wife has just spent £100 on having a Bury bluetooth system fitted to her car and it shows up what a joke system the Honda is! The second issue is why on earth has Honda allowed the car to go to markert with a clear design fault. Anyone thinking of buying a crv should make sure they take a test drive on a wet day. You will soon find that the design of the plastic door bottoms and cill covers in the front doors is such that road mud and debris is drawn into the gap and gathers on a ledge in the cill in such a way that it is nigh on impossible to get in or out of the car without getting trousers filthy.

Submitted: 26/08/2010 22:20:27

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Kate Rhodes, Sussex

Honda Jazz 1.4 EX 2010

Having traded in our Civic 1.5 Sport which was 10 years old we bought our 1.4 Jazz EX thinking this was the ideal car for us as we are now retired and wanted some thing a little eaiser to get into, but we are very disappointed in the Jazz as fuel consumption is worse than the Civic averaging about 45mpg rather than the 50mpg. Also poor quality interior, too many gimicks rather than good quality finish and we have a problem with the gear box as on occasions it is not possible to get any gear. All in all I think Honda need to look at this model and bring back quality.

Submitted: 22/08/2010 09:41:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Yates, Lothians

Honda CR-V 2007

I have just purchased a Honda CR-V 2007 and await with great enthusiasim for the results of the next month or so. I will keep my comments updated. I am an experienced Honda user.

Responses to this review

Hi there, I too have just got my first CRV a 2007 ex 2.2 diesel. It has 90,000 on the clock but drives like new. I saved nearly £4,000 having 60,000 miles extra but it’s a Honda so no worries - Peter Hicks from England

peter hicks from England has responded to review - ID: 5926.

hi, there i to have just got my first crv a 2007 ex 2.2 diesel it has 90,000 on the clock but drives like new.saved nearly £ 4,000 haveing 60,000 miles extra but its a honda so no worries.

Submitted: 15/08/2010 17:35:15

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tim Jarvis, Herefordshire

Honda Civic 2.2 diesel sport 2006

For people who moan about the visibility out of the back, well presumably you test drove the car?? How can you moan about it after you have bought it? Great looking, fast, good handling, comfy. Could be more refined; noisy suspension, passenger seat noisy when unoccupied, temperatures sensor failed at 65,000 miles (a common fault according to Civic info sites) not expected from a Honda. Also disturbing to hear that people have had new clutches and discs with only 49,500 miles, I think it says something about their driving as I drive with a heavy foot no disc trouble clutch is fine and I get an average of 56 mpg. Overall great car, later models have been more refined.

Submitted: 15/08/2010 08:12:14

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Andrew Brooks, Leicestershire

Honda Jazz 1.4 s 2002

Retired recently and needed economical runabout. Generally interested in cars & always do my research. Previously had company 2.2 diesel FN2 Civic,(own choice) so knew about Honda quality & engineering. Found a low mileage (43500) example at local dealer, with "proper" Honda 12 month warranty. Spare wheel well was full of water, but knew about common rear door seal problem.(that’s why I checked!) Replaced by dealer. Noticed "buzzy" gearbox, but thought nothing much about it. Noise became much worse-turned out to be bearings, but replaced under warranty. Since then (now 6months), have been nothing but impressed. Ideal "pensioner" car (sorry!). As stated before Grp 3 insurance, £120 raod tax and fantastic economy. Worst 38mpg, in winter, on very short trips with all electrics on, best 63mpg. Averaged 55mpg on holiday (I dont hang about), currently doing 50mpg. Surprisingly nippy for a 1.4 (even my son says so, and he drives a 2.3 litre V5 Golf!). Remarkably versatile luggage area- I recently helped someone to move house, and it’s amazing the stuff you can cram in. Fit and finish generally good. I agree about the ride, and can be noisy, but apparently depends upon the tyres you use. Steering can also be slightly "sticky". However, overall, would have no hesitation in recommending one, provided you check for the common faults first.

Submitted: 07/08/2010 21:21:56

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

D, Northern Ireland

Honda Jazz 1.4s 2004

Bought it new in 2004, 33k done so far. Used 6 tyres, 2 sets of front brake pads, serviced it yearly, 38mpg urban, 51mpg motorway. Great little car, could recommend it to anyone.

Submitted: 04/08/2010 12:49:48

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Andrew, Perthshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.4 VTEC Executive Auto 2010

Brilliant car to drive. It sticks to the road and grips very well in twisty corners like the proverbial ’s**t on a shovel’. Amazing fuel economy for a large powerful engine, I’ve seen figures of up to 45 mpg being returned. The auto ’box is superb, it’s extermely smooth and responsive. It works best when it’s being driven hard in the tiptronic mode, that’s where you can really exploit that amazing VTEC engine all the way up to its sky-high rev limit of 7500 rpm. It is extremely quiet when all you want do is cruise on motorways. It is so quiet in fact that you sometimes forget how fast you are actually travelling, I’ve seen the car cruising at 110-120 mph (not intentionally) with very little noise and quite a bit of power in reserve. Sixty miles per hour from a standstill comes up in 7.2 seconds. As far as I’ve read, the car can easily exceed its advertised 140 mph top speed and reach speeds of around the 145-147 mph mark (as some magazines have recorded). All-in-all, the Accord is an amazing car. It is extremely reliable with only one fault, squealing/hesitant brakes. But, this is due to extremely high milage and the car is due to be replaced at anytime. Apart from that, I’d recommend this car to anybody who is looking for a medium-sized alternative to your usual Mercs, Audis and Beemers. With the mentioned Germans, you are only buying the badge and everything that’s standard on the Accord is an extra on the German’s. Therefore, nothing can beat Japanese reliability and value for money.

Submitted: 03/08/2010 21:06:09

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Deborah, Essex

Honda Jazz 1.4 2009

Against my better judgement I was persuaded to buy this as we needed to replace our worn out and much loved Toyota Starlet runabout last year (110,000 miles and much missed). It’s undoubtedly good on fuel consumption, but a noisy ride and weirdly uncomfortable seats. Tolerable, but I find myself choosing to take the proper car more often. Keeping the mileage down on this one seems not to have saved us much cash though - we have just had to have the two front tyres replaced at 11,000 miles. The dealership were shocking - rude and unhelpful and unwilling to explain the tyre wear on the inside front on both sides. Not what I would expect and if it goes on like this... Not cheap to run either.... no more Hondas for us! Ever.

Responses to this review

My Jazz auto 2006 only done 2866 miles; I only use it for shopping. It went in for a service and M.O.T today and I have been told next year I will need 4 new tyres as they have started to perish. When asked why as only done such a low milage I was told they do after 4 years. My wind screen wipers had also to be replaced; funny all 3 went at the same time! Also had to get a new battery this year. Not on my list now to recommend to anyone. servicing also very expensive. So much for Honda Quality - Anne from Hertfordshire

Tyres do degrade with time as do wiper blades, you get this with ANY car! Phatman from England

Submitted: 28/07/2010 16:17:33

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

George Cunningham, Fife and Kinross Shires

Honda Jazz i-shift 2009

After having a 2002 Jazz CVT I bought a 2009 i-shift model. I’ve had it less than a year and have now gone back to a CVT model. A great car spoiled with this terrible auto i-shift system. I have given 4 star rating to the car only, I am afraid 0 for transmission.

Submitted: 26/07/2010 14:59:01

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Julie Thomas, Blaenau Gwent

Honda CR-V Diesel 2005

My Honda CR-V diesel had a new turbo after 50,000 miles, the problem I have now is it is smoking on start up, any other Honda owners have the same problem? Went into local Honda dealer to have turbo fitted and told them of the smoking problem, they said it was not smoking; believe you and me it is, when on holiday people commented on the smoke! No Honda I am not telling lies! Anyone with any idea of the problem please let me know, it has been on a diagnostic machine when the turbo was under investigation.

Responses to this review

Not sure if your car has the same engine as mine (see review below Honda CR-V Honda CR-V 2.2 iCTDi 140 EX 2008 Peter Smith) but after my turbo exploded I had blue smoking problems on cold start and hard motorway acceleration, after 4 trips to Honda for them to say "NO Fault Found Sir" I left he car with them for the night in December, took the keys home so they couldn’t move it returning the next morning at 08:00 and asked the Service Manager and "Master" Diagnostic Technician (Master Fitter more like!) to stand at the back of the car when I started it up.............I’m please to say they became completely Engulfed in BLUE OIL smoke, that much so the Service Manager’s eyes started to run..result!!!!!!! After the engine was stripped it became apparent all four set of valve stem seals had been damaged when the turbo failed thus allowing oil to leak into the chambers under extreme load and shut down...! I had the car back after two week’s once Honda managed to fly some replacement seals in from Holland. These main dealers think they know everything and try to bully you into believing there’s nothing wrong with the car until its out of warranty, this way they can charge you full price £100.00 per hour as apposed to Honda Dealer warranty rate of £34.50 per hour........huge profit differences when your talking 15+ hours to remove and re-fit a cylinder head. Push your dealer hard, once they know you’re not a push over you’ll be surprised what you can get done. Hope this helps - Peter Smith from Worcestershire

My 03/2005 CRV 2.2 140 HP Diesel started to blow blue smoke at cold start at about 45,000km. It has lost some power and made a strange sound when going off the accelerator during gearshift. Honda-dealer never located the problem, but I did. It turned out to be a fault on the turbo (small oil-leakage into the turbo). Bought a brand new Garret turbo through STK TurboTechnic, Altenkirchen - Germany. Delivered at my doorstep by UPS at a price all-in of EUR 810!!!!!! Bjorn Amundsen from Norway

Submitted: 24/07/2010 13:33:52

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ian Pollard, Cheshire

Honda CR-V 2007

This car was second hand when we got it 12 months old and only 12000 miles on the clock. It drove fine and the all-round visibility was good. The diesel engine is a lot better than the petrol. Legroom front and back is great even with the front seats pushed all the way back. I have removed the parcel shelf and the plastic is of poor quality. Mine is red and we had great difficulty getting hold of paint that matched. Tyre wear is my biggest gripe I have now done 22400 miles and will be looking for new tyres all-round FRONT WHEEL TRACKING MUST BE CHECKED EVERY 6 MONTHS AND TYRE PRESURE EVERY WEEK. Would still recommend this car to anyone. Dealer servicing is too expensive and I change air oil and fuel filter every 6000 miles or 6 months and use top grade oil, this I can do for under £100 over £200 cheaper than a dealer. Great car and good mpg for a 4x4.

Responses to this review

What is it about main dealers these days? Are they all tarred with the same brush? Are they all out to fleece their customers? My one wanted to change my disc pads, 6 months ago! He quoted some fantastic price. I took it to my local so called "back street garage" who checked the discs and said the dealer was telling porkies, there was nothing wrong with them! I have got an extra 4000 miles from them to date. Incidentally, I would trust my back street garage any day before the local Honda main dealer. The main dealer wanted to charge me £260 to change the oil! Local garage, just £60 with top spec synth oil included! Is this just the so called "British Rip Off" culture I wonder - Peter Hartingdon from England

Submitted: 20/07/2010 21:32:06

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Alan Wingrove, Lancashire

Honda CR-V ES 2010

This is my 5th Honda....bought on the past knowledge of how reliable Honda’s are. I have had the CRV 6 weeks.....and am beginning to realise that the 11 year old HRV (132000 miles) was a better car. I find the CRV to be very sluggish on joining the motorway...OK you "Kickdown" to get the thing moving from 50mph, all it seems to do is rev right round to 7000 then just as you ease off thinking nothing is going to happen it decides "Oh you want to go faster".....great when a BMW (or White Van man is powering towards the rear). This in my view is dangerous. I realise that you are not going to get great economy and power but this car is really underpowered for motorway work and hills too. We can all see that it’s not designed for out and out speed. Having said that though the car does feel solid and with all the plastic wheel arch liners I wouldn’t think rust in the future will be a problem..it seems built to last. One last annoying point it the shelf in the boot...when the tonneau cover is fitted (and retracted) the shelf when folded up doesn’t stay up! This is the first Honda I shan’t be sorry to see the back of.....a missed opportunity Honda!

Responses to this review

UPDATE: Just to say that here we are a few months on from my original review, I am now of the view that I was unfair to the CRV. Having now got used to the auto transmission (and making allowances) the issues of accellaration are not such a problem. The car is giving a good 400 to a tankful (Petrol) and that is mainly A road driving, it is effortless on the motorway. So all in all a great safe car...wiping egg of my face as I write this! - Alan Wingrove from Lancashire

Submitted: 19/07/2010 13:05:32

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Geraldine, Berkshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 2010

Noisy, tinny, unstable on motorways, a real gas guzzler, windscreen cracked within first month, dealer said it was a fault with the car design due to large glass roof reducing rigidity of body, unecessary complex automatic wiper and light controls. Honda should remember the old axiom: KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid! Will NEVER buy another one!

Responses to this review

I can agree whole-heartedly with the comments about the instability on the motorway of the Honda Jazz year 2010 models. I am currently in a war with the dealer and Honda customer services, trying to get it fixed. Predictably both are dodging the issue. Must admit to being a bit worried about your cracking windscreen, I did feel that the large glass panel in the roof could potentially weaken the body shell. After my experiences with this car and Honda’s dismissive and unhelpful attitude towards it, I will never buy anything made by Honda again - Geoffrey Bailey from Dumfriesshire

I own a 1.4 Honda Jazz ES 2010 and have no problems with stability. I tow a small 2-berth caravan and have no problems whatsoever. Although you will never be first away at the lights. This is my 4th Jazz, get them serviced at a local private garage, none have been back to a dealer for warranty work. I would drive nothing else - Peter Dobbie from Lanarkshire

Submitted: 12/07/2010 15:23:56

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Brenda Lanchester, Suffolk

Honda Jazz 12.2 auto/man 2003

I own a Jazz auto/man 2003 12.2. I am presently recording 55.6 to the gallon urban use, very pleased with this. I travel 12 miles back and forward to work, twice daily totalling 48 miles daily. I did not expect to achieve this on short journeys.

Submitted: 09/07/2010 21:24:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Reg Ward, Surrey

Honda Jazz 1.2 2010

Picked up brand new 1.2(2010) from dealer whilst my 1.4(2008) was having some paint work done. It felt like a tin can compared to my own car. If I was to buy another similar car again I would NOT buy this car as it has lost its quality appeal.

Submitted: 07/07/2010 15:02:06

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ben, Northern Ireland

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2007

As has been often repeated this car is very practical and offers great interior space for it’s overall footprint. It can hold 3 child seats (we’ve got stages 1, 2 and 3) next to each other in the back and fit a double buggy and a weekend’s worth of luggage in the boot. Driving it is OK with light controls, good gearchange and free revving engine. However, the steering is vague (I think due to the electric power steering Honda have used) and a the car a little noisy at speed. I don’t notice any problem with poor ride quality. Fuel ecomony is reasonable but nowhere near the claims made by Honda. We get low 30’s mpg for town driving, high 30’s mpg at motorway speeds and low 40’s mpg for more relaxed cruising. Initial purchase and servicing are higher than other cars in the same class but you get more space and better resale so if you can afford it in the first place I don’t think there is anything to lose overall.

Submitted: 25/06/2010 21:12:20

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jim Newman, Sussex

Honda Jazz 1.2ES 2008

I have 2 Jazzes both 1.2 engines. The old model knocks spots of the new one for ride, performance and economy. What a disappointment. Can’t wait to trade the new one for something else (not Honda, on this showing), I`ll be keeping the old one though...great car.

Submitted: 14/06/2010 22:25:15

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Frederick Pidgeon, Hampshire

Honda Jazz EX 2009

Thought I was buying a quality product but paintwork finish left a lot to be desired compared to other makes. Less than a year after purchase the alloy wheels started to corrode badly; Honda has yet to comment on full replacement. Would definitely not consider buying another Honda.

Submitted: 14/06/2010 19:34:21

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Terry Porter, London

Honda Civic EX 2008

A great car. I would never buy another Volkswagen. The Honda Civic is the best car money can buy!

Submitted: 11/06/2010 08:49:14

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Annie MacCallum, Argyllshire

Honda Jazz 2010

Great car, I just wish that I could keep it!

Submitted: 10/06/2010 08:46:19

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Geoffrey Bailey, Dumfriesshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 EX I-shift 2010

Great little car, loads of interior space, the multi folding rear seats are a piece of genius design. On the road, poky little engine gives great MPG, and the I-shift transmission suits both my wife and myself. HONDA THEN SPOIL IT ALL BY GIVING IT THE STEERING CHARACTERISTICS OF A TRABANT. At any speed over 55 MPH it is impossible to keep it in a straight line without constant correction. The electric power assistance comes in in fits and starts resulting in over correction in response to even minute steering wheel movements. Repesentations to both the selling dealer and to Honda Head Office have brought totally dismissive responses, stating that there is no known problem?? So much for Honda`s much trumpeted Customer Care.

Responses to this review

Exactly the same problem as my mother in-law had with her jazz. Went for its second service back in September. it has got only 5500 miles on the clock. Told the dealership in Hereford. They checked it and we were then told that the steering rack had to be changed. This problem was on the car from day one. The job was done today on the warranty. Take your car back to your dealership and ask them to check it out. Good luck! - Mark Witt from Wales

I’m glad to see someone else has the problem of the power steering operating in fits and starts on the motorways - it feels really strange and heavy at times - Tricia from Kent

Submitted: 10/06/2010 08:40:15

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Smith, Worcestershire

Honda CR-V Honda CR-V 2.2 iCTDi 140 EX 2008

Car registered in June 2008, now covered 91’000 miles! In my view the CR-V is best suited as a typical family car doing 10-15K per anum max, not a high mileage sales reps car like the Accord. I’m very disapointed as my 05 plate Accord traveled 158’000 in 3yrs with nothing more that a replacment turbo at just short of 100’000 miles. I’m on first name terms with the Service team at Avondale Honda (Solihull) as the CR-V has been back and forth that many times excluding sevices, current replacments components are as follows : - 1) Radio (CD Rotation Motor Burt Out) 2) Front Subframe Bushes (Worn out at 40K again at 83K!) 3) N/S/F CV Joint (Knocking when turning Left) 4) Altenator Failure 5) Air Conditioning Relay (Burnt Out, causing flat battery) 6) O/S/R Wheel Bearing (whining) 7) Turbo Failure (Internals Exploded) 8) Drivers Seat Chassis (Runners Failed) 9) Top Coolant Hose Burst (Core Chamber Blockage) 10) O/S/F Headlight Failure (Seal Failed letting in Water) 11) Rear Wash Wipe Failer (filled Boot With Water!!!!) I can’t wait to get rid of this car in another 12 months, however I’m hoping the gearbox or engine blows up so the lease company are forced to take it back prematurely as the warranty has now expired, saying that the only thing I will miss when I change the car is the coffee machine at my local dealer!!! All in all, my view of Honda has changed, if you want a reliable Honda Rep car, buy / lease an Accord or go back to the BMW / VAG or Mercedes dealership. Try again Honda, perhaps send some of your engineers from Swindon to Solihull, this way they can find out how to build a real 4X4!

Responses to this review

Your lucky if you can operate that damn coffee machine in Avondale! I am an engineer and it’s to tricky for me. You have filled me with joy as my Accord is about to be replaced with a CRV that will be looked after at Solihull! Honda HQ used to phone me for feedback but not lately, guess they don’t care any more. That said, service at Solihull for me hasn’t been bad but not 50% as good as Volvo in Redditch was ;( Mr Rob from Worcestershire

Submitted: 08/06/2010 21:47:52

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Smith, Worcestershire

Honda CR-V 2.2 iCTDi 140 EX 2008

The car was registered in June 2008 and has now covered 91,000 miles! In my view the CR-V is best suited as a typical family car doing 10-15K per anum max, not a high mileage sales reps car like the Accord. I’m very disappointed as my 05 plate Accord travel’ed 158,000 in 3yrs with nothing more that a replacment turbo at just short of 100,000 miles. I’m on first name terms with the Service team at Avondale Honda (Solihull) as the CR-V has been back and forth that many times excluding sevices. Current replacement components are as follows : - 1) Radio (CD Rotation Motor Burt Out) 2) Front Subframe Bushes (worn out at 40K again at 83K!) 3) N/S/F CV Joint (Knocking when turning Left) 4) Altenator Failure 5) Air Conditioning Relay (Burnt Out, causing flat battery) 6) O/S/R Wheel Bearing (whining) 7) Turbo Failure (Internals Exploded) 8) Drivers Seat Chassis (Runners Failed) 9) Top Coolant Hose Burst (Core Chamber Blockage) 10) O/S/F Headlight Failure (Seal Failed letting in Water) 11) Rear Wash Wipe Failer (filled Boot With Water!!!!) I cant wait to get rid of this car in another 12 months, however I’m hoping the gearbox or engine blows up so the lease company are forced to take it back prematurely as the warranty has now expired. Saying that, the only thing I will miss when I change the car is the coffee machine at my local dealer!!! All in all, my view of Honda has changed, if you want a reliable Honda Rep car, buy / lease an Accord or go back to the BMW / VAG or Mercedes dealership. Try again Honda, perhaps send some of your engineers from Swindon to Solihull, this way they can find out how to build a real 4X4!

Responses to this review

15/01/2011 - The car has just been in for its 137500 service and been condemned/de-fleeted by the lease company once they received the quote for the work required - I’m absolutely ecstatic, that was the best news’s I’ve ever received from the Dealer!!!!! Front & Rear brake pads and discs, 4 tyres, set of glow plugs, what’s more, on top of these routine replacement components, I’ve been complaining of poor starting in the cold and noises/harsh vibrations from the gearbox for months. The dealer mechanics said "nothing was wrong" or "it’s a design characteristic of the car". What tosh - they’ve suddenly decided to investigate the faults I continuously reported (due to a lack of work at this time of year when charging labor rates of £100hr +VAT!!!), the cylinder head gasket has failed, causing smoking / poor starting and the gearbox lay shaft bearing have worn out.......cost to fix including the service and routine items £4851+VAT!!!! I get my new Ford S-Max of Tuesday......can’t wait. As I said before Honda, if you want to build a reliable 4X4 - pop to Solihull for a few weeks and shadow the boys at Landrover who’ve been doing it for the best part of 65 years!

Submitted: 08/06/2010 16:01:03

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

June Hornby, Berwickshire

Honda Jazz ishift auto 2010

I have driven automatic Honda for years and was totally disappointed with the ishift it is like someone doing a very bad gear change and when moving off from stationary, it is very slow.

Responses to this review

I find the auto OK anticipating the gear change just like I did way back in the double declutch days. For faster travel the shift stick or paddles are ideal. Quite well kitted out but doesn’t attract unwanted attention for its looks which is fine by me - Richard John Hornby from Cheshire

Submitted: 30/05/2010 21:12:08

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Linda Parker, Lancashire

Honda Jazz 1.4 2006

The only thing I don’t like is the floppy back ledge. The dealer said it was for safety, as in a shunt solid ledges could push forward and injure a rear seat passenger, I doubt the validity of this. Apart from that I like it, as a roomy economical runabout it has to rate with the best. For a long journey too noisy as is the Accord, which we have ridden in.

Submitted: 30/05/2010 21:00:39

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Pat, Yorkshire

Honda Jazz 2008

Second Jazz, no problems last two years but bought spare wheel. Best car to park, just a pity insurance is expensive. ENJOY.

Submitted: 26/05/2010 09:53:00

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ali, Angus (Forfarshire)

Honda Jazz 2005

Great car to drive and very versatile. I get 30mpg town driving and 37mpg on motorways, which is nothing like it says in the book. It has had some problems including gear box going, a recall for a window switch and is going in to get the window seals fixed as it leaks rain into the boot and back footwell. Despite this I have never had any concerns that it would break down or be unreliable. Tyres are quite expensive for it and difficult to get if not going to the main dealer; apparently due to the size of them. These cars are like a tardis and huge inside. I have the backseats folded up and have room for 2 dogs in the car. Great wee car.

Responses to this review

Fofarshire is questionable. Scots on alert! - Dean Wallace from United States of America

Submitted: 23/05/2010 21:57:45

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Nick Allen, Swansea

Honda Logo 2003

I have owned my logo for 7yrs, it’s taken my family all over the country and over to Holland with no problems. I can honestly say this is the best car I’ve ever bought for reliability and would not get rid of her at anytime she’s a little gem and a car I can trust never to let me down anytime!!

Submitted: 16/05/2010 21:10:30

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Sam P, Surrey

Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol 2010

I own a new Honda Jazz 1.2 petrol which is a quite a basic car one can drive. For those users who drive extensively on motorway, this is definitely not the car I would advise. The car wobbles due to the wind pressure, air and traffic noise can be clearly heard when all windows are shut (Honda dealers mentioned this is normal in Honda Jazz), steering is not easy, pick is poor on motorways but the best of all is the fuel consumption. Otherwise I would not go for a Honda Jazz. Honda dealers rip you off during the servicing by frightening you about the condition of your car. Beware of the dealers.. Rgds,

Responses to this review

Picking my new Honda up tomorrow, so a bit early to comment on the car’s performance. Please don’t class all Honda dealers by your bad experience(s). Have had some brilliant service from the staff at our local Honda agents in Chesterfield. Not pushy... Gave a good price for the small motorhome we were trading in. If this is a taste of what’s to come - great. If not will let the website know! - David Griffiths from Derbyshire

Submitted: 04/05/2010 20:37:37

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Graham Atherton, Cheshire

Honda Jazz 2009

Bought another Jazz in Feb 2009 based on my experience of my first Jazz. Again a great little car giving me no problems with a few important little extras that the first car did not have - air con being the main one BUT it now has a service interval computer that tells me when it wants a service. I have done 15 000 miles in 14 months and it has just informed me it wants another oil change service - the third in that time. This is twice the rate of oil change needed by the old Jazz and at £120-140 its not cheap! Allied to that moan is the fact I read that I could have opted for the fixed price servicing for an up front price of £500 for the whole period of ownership which would have saved me a lot of money but the dealer never mentioned it (I wonder why??)

Submitted: 16/04/2010 22:04:18

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tony Green, England

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE Sport Auto 2008

The car has only done 18000 Miles from new (Genuine) it has just developed the the judder from the gearbox start clutch assembly. I have not yet reported it to the Honda Dealer. At the moment I am not very happy.

Responses to this review

We have a Jazz as well. It too stutters from a full stop start. Been to Honda several times, all parts changed and it still does it. Took it to aftermarket service in an attempt to repair; they just shake their head and say there is no way to fix it. Apparently there is a computer for the transmission and one for the enigne and they are not syncronised or if they are the dimensions on the parts are not correct but there is no adjustments that can be made.... what you get is what you have. Wish I could sell it but with a problem like this, who would want it? - Ken Lowe from Australia

Submitted: 31/03/2010 12:43:23

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Bill Taylor, Warwickshire

Honda Jazz 2007

Where to start? the fuel consumption 42 mpg for a non urban daily journey, the grinding noises ("it’s the tyres sir") the days of wasted effort trying to get stuff fixed, the jiggly suspension, the frankly terrifying steering (don’t EVER expect it to steer straight ahead) the tappet clatter on start up (at least this is very nostalgic - it reminds me of a thirty year old Triumph 650) the switchgear it took four attempts to get fixed. Very nondescript. Strange white blooms on the paintwork. GOOD POINTS: Friendly garages (pleasant to talk to while you are waiting for an hour or two) very clever internal layout, nothing else has failed. Paddle shift was very useful in the recent snow. Overall...where is the number of that VW dealer??

Responses to this review

Tappet adjustment should be carried out at each 24k/2 year service for the earlier models or at 62.5k for later versions. If you don’t have this full service you will slowly get this noise develop when cold. The white bloom you see, is a scuffed lacquer coat on metalic/pearlescent paint finishes - be more careful! - Marshall Honda from England

Submitted: 28/02/2010 21:04:50

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Victoria Boland, Cheshire

Honda Civic 2007

I have owned the Honda Civic for 3 years now and it has not had one fault in all this time. The main dealers are all brilliant to deal with which is a refreshing change.

Submitted: 28/02/2010 20:49:51

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Syd Taylor, Staffordshire

Honda Insight SE 2009

If you’re very green, the Insight could be the start of a beautiful friendship for you, because it’s a petrol-electric hybrid running on a 1.3 litre 88bhp petrol engine mated to a 14bhp electric motor. In the best hybrid tradition the petrol motor is cleverly assisted by the electric motor when the cars computers deem it necessary for a ’jolt of volts’. My pal Dr. Frankenstein - who has always had a healthy interest in hybrids - swears by his. Looking very striking with its swooping body, this five door five-seater is a world away from the two-seater Insight of twenty years ago, which sold in tiny numbers. The new Insight is a very practical small family car which significantly undercuts its main rival - the Toyota Prius - by around £3,000. Insight prices start at £16,236. First impressions are that - while the slippery shape might cut the aerodynamic mustard - one has to say that driver ingress and egress is not made easier by a steeply raked A pillar that might dent ones designer baseball cap. Once settled inside, however, a chap can get comfy easily enough. There’s supportive seating, room to stretch out for those in the back and front and a big boot to carry all that unnecessary luggage - and you find all the usual electrically powered adjuncts to modern day motoring for the terminally atrophied. Similarly, life saving airbags abound - but in saving oneself via these inflatable Salvationists ethical questions arise, which are contrary to this cars philosophy. Noxious gases are released, making self preservation a very selfish and non-green thing to do. Surely a Greenist should heroically sacrifice himself on the altar of purity for the greater good. I suggest a sharp spike on the steering column. Coincidentally, a fine example of heroic Greenism presented itself to me as I crested the brow of a hill followed by a sharp bend, and witnessed how a green minded driver had done his best and parked his Prius in an adjacent green field: such a pity that a fence was in the way. I judge the Insights performance to be adequate for today’s world with its top speed of 113mph - but make no mistake, this is not a car for those who see driving as an involving and (dare I say it) enjoyable business. It is a functional tool to fit in with these straitened and strangled times - and it does so very well. I was reasonably satisfied with the celerity of its movement up a steep gradient, but ’punchy’ was not the word that sprang to mind. Errant thoughts of pressing on in the manner of the heavy right foot brigade were sternly corrected by the Cyclops eye of economy’ that loomed into sight on the dash above the steering wheel. One is presented with current speed (in digital format) in large numerals against a background that changes from icy blue (naughty driving) to emerald green (saving the planet driving) as you progress (if that’s the word) along the road. The digital display is big enough for Mr. Magoo himself to notice whether or not he’d overstepped the mark. This is a car where that ’green about the gills’ feeling is positively advantageous. That blue light is indicative - not of our friend Dixon of Dock Green - but of the legions of Blue Meanies ready to pounce on cavalier carbon burning. Not only that, but drivers of unreliable cars of yesteryear will have to fight back the default reflex of reaching for the ignition key every time the Insight comes to a halt at junctions and becomes eerily silent. This is the eco-imperative that very cleverly, cunningly and with a degree of technological sophistication far beyond the ken of ordinary humans, comes into play and wraps down firmly on knuckleheaded extraneous gas-guzzling, be it ever so marginal. It seems to be saying ’a drop of fuel saved is a boon to the planet.’ Even so, fuel economy is not super duper. I averaged around 55mpg when Honda claim around 65 mpg. This could, of course, be attributable to my use of full afterburner everywhere. Trusty Trevor and Theresa visiting National Trust properties would undoubtedly get better results. Certainly, one might add, from a purely selfish and penny pinching perspective it can’t hurt the wallet either. Have you seen what they’re charging for petrol at the pumps these days? In fact, I wouldn’t put it past Honda to have in development, a device incorporated in the seat belt that responds to driver hypertension in the aftermath of filling up. This device triggers soothing aromas and relaxing music. They have yet to come up with a device that regenerates the contents of the wallet though - but I live in hope. There is, of course, a great deal more to this remarkable car than electrical wizardry. The CVT transmission conveys the feeling of a continuous powerband rather than selected ratios, so there is that strange feeling of a lack of a direct correlation between road speed and engine revs. Once you get used to it, all is fine and you can pretend that you’re jet engine powered and the engines are just ’spooling up’ ready for take-off. One has to say that the car never feels a machine for the open road. Ride quality is not ’magic carpet quality’ when cruising nor ’glued to the road’ when ’pressing on’. Compromise only works so far, but in our traffic congested, over regulated, ludicrously clown painted highways, one has to ask if there’s such a thing as an ’open’ road anymore. Given that this is the case for nearly all of us, the Insight makes a lot of sense. On long motorway inclines, revs fall away and one feels for the low ratio that’s going to provide instant power. It’s not there - to the extent that the car rules the roost. And for the environmentally conscious these days, it’s often thought that the driver must be ’imposed’ upon - if only for the greater good. The question is then ’Are we all doomed?’.’ Is this that National Trust trolley to which we are all soon to be committed?’ Well, I’m pleased to be able to tell you that there’s enough of the driving experience to provide fun - yet an abundance of technological admonitions to forestall untoward adventurousness. It’s a car to like, if not to love: compromised, perhaps, but sublimely diplomatic in the spooning of its medicine. The pill is well sugared, in other words. The likes of Jeremiah Clarkson may regard it as castor oil, and grimace with distaste: but Nanny knows best - given the state of the planet today.

Submitted: 26/02/2010 06:43:09

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Colin South, England

Honda Jazz ES 2009

This is the 4th Jazz I have owned and each new model improves on its predecessor.The current model ticks all my requirement boxes,is comfortable , economical and like the previous models is a terrific all rounder for load carrying and utilisation of space. My one gripe is the rear brake discs are showing a lot of corrosion, which is a bit disconcerting on a car less than 12 months old, but the dealer is to replace them under warranty.

Responses to this review

I have just had a 1st service on my 09 Honda Jazz, with less than 4,000 miles the rear brake discs have had to be replaced ( all be it under warranty), the discs were corroded and when releasing the handbrake it would hold on and release with a thud. My biggest worry is that the Civic ( an 09 model) courtesy car had the same issues, the rear discs were even more corroded than on my Jazz and had only 10,000 miles on clock. If the rear discs are only going to last 12 months then I will not be keeping long. This is not the first rear disc vehicle I have owned, it is however first Honda, but is first with a problem - Barry Walton from Cheshire

Yes, I agree with the corrosion on the rear brake discs! My Honda Jazz is only one month old and there are signs of corrosion and it isn’t right. Not impressed. I am still keeping my eye out on any other problem areas, however, the good outweighs the bad for now - Leigh George from Middlesex

I bought my Jazz in April 2009 and like Colin only have one gripe. During the first service in April 2010, the rear discs and pads required replacing at 4,500 miles, I am now approaching my second service and the replacement discs are showing the same signs of corrosion and scoring as before. I have contacted Honda on 0845 200 8000 and have received a response in which they will await a report from the dealer when I have my second service at the end of the month. As an ex-motor industry employee, I know this is not acceptable. I would recommend anyone with this issue to contact above number and complain - Barry Walton from Cheshire

Submitted: 20/02/2010 06:26:45

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Syd Taylor, Staffordshire

Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC Si 2009

You won’t find civic pride in our town centres these days, with litter adorning the pavements and our once prestigious municipal buildings left to go to seed, as they are turned into drinking dens for the ’alco-pop’ generation. But you will find civic pride in the driveways of the fortunate owners of Hondas superb hatchback. Some would be tempted to call this cars design ’futuristic’ but the wonderful thing is that it belongs, not to the future, but to the ’here and now’. Unlike many of its ’wannabe’ rivals, it is a true precision instrument tailored for the needs of today’s sensible, but enterprising, motorist. VW’s Golf might be the benchmark ingot of ’Tiger Tank’ solidity but the Honda Civic is the benchmark for chronometric standards of engineering. The owner/driver knows he can depend upon Hondas established reputation, which is second to none. A dreamlike combination of style, performance, comfort, reliability and definite class is available for a price that’s great value at £17,559. Surely this is too good to be true. Well, it almost has you rubbing your eyes in disbelief. How do they do it when you consider that low a spec. Ford Focus costs more than this Honda. It is said that the Japanese habit is to ’hint’ at things rather than being too explicit, so let me lay it on the line. This car, for what it is, for what it does, for what it costs and for what it gives its owner in terms of pride of ownership, is as good as it gets. It might not get you from A to B as fast as a Bullet Train but you’re guaranteed to arrive at your destination with a minimum of strain. In its understated and stylish way, this machine is a veritable temple to technology - a dynamic demonstration of all that is best in the progressive world. The build quality is of the highest order and the equipment list is lengthy - and on this Si spec. car you get climate control, an excellent audio system, half-leather upholstery and, of course, power windows. You even get a refrigerated glove box for storing your chocolate in the summers that we never have. Needless to say, it’s a very practical and flexible five-door hatchback. Hondas respect and consideration for its customers is evident down to the smallest detail. While most of the niceties of design are tucked away in the internal mechanicals, one cannot help but be aware of them every time one switches on the ignition. Beyond the attractive surface lines of this machine and the ergonomically perfect and attractively different interior, there is the beauty and poetry of refined mechanical and technological excellence. A near perfect position was easy for me to tailor on the comfortable and supportive seats, setting the mood for particularly relaxed driving. The 140PS 1.8litre VTEC engine is a jewel to enjoy, revving sweetly and smoothly to take you to speeds up to nearly 130mph - yet at the same time just sipping fuel. I easily achieved an overall 45mpg, which is in stark contrast to the pathetic showings of some ’superminis’ I could name. There’s the finest ’snickety snick’ six speed gearbox in the business, transmitting drive to the front wheels; so piloting the Civic is delightful - whether you’re subsonic or supersonic. It drives so nicely, majoring on that hard to achieve, ideal balance between ride comfort and pin sharp handling. Labour intensive twisty roads that can make a chap perspire in other vehicles become a delight to traverse in the Civic. Poised like a Sadlers Wells artiste, the fluency and composure are so reassuring that one is tempted to be bold. This is just the sort of car that bureaucrats in the bowels of the Ministry for Perpetual Misery would tax out of existence, despite its clean breathing exhaust and super safety gear - not only that, but my test car came in inflammatory Terrorist Red. For Home Counties purchasers, in the past, the hallmark of a cars reliability was the extent to which one could depend upon it for a trip to Scotland. With the Civic one feels that a thousand John O’Groats trips a day for a hundred years wouldn’t be out of the question before one would even begin to hear a squeak of complaint. Sweet as silk, keen as a blade and smooth as cream - Honda just seem to keep pouring it on: and I have to say, ’I like it’. If only the Community Charge could be such good value for money, we might then see the rebirth of those ’Civic’ values we all aspire to, but which are only attainable these days to the fortunate buyers of the exceptional all-rounder that is the Honda Civic. Driving one of these cars is to feel reassured that your needs are being conscientiously attended to, that your individuality is recognised and that you’re afforded due respect for your good sense is seeking such a car in the first place. And all for a price that’s guaranteed not to raise any complaints.

Responses to this review

Shocking, boring, unreadable report. Honda cars are good though - Harry Scholes from England

So Syd, I guess you quite like it then? How much ARE they paying you by the way? Tee hee - Paul from Buckinghamshire

Some of you may by now have noticed that Syd writes reviews on every thing from a size 8 woodscrew to a space shuttle. He seems to be trying to get a job as a reviewer. Read his report on the VW Golf! - Arthur Gruntfuttock from Lincolnshire

Try using punctuation and pauses, idiot! - Paragraph Pete from Afghanistan

Submitted: 19/02/2010 21:13:24

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Rick, Ireland

Honda Civic 2.2 CDti 2008

Great car...the best I’ve had in 15 years of driving. Really enjoy its interactivity and performance. In terms of economy, it is great once you keep yourself from hitting the accelerator too much. All in all a car you should have no problems with and one you’ll enjoy going out to each morning. Have mine nearly a year now and nothing, I mean nothing has even tweaked my attention as going wrong. Most cars can’t do that!

Responses to this review

I’ve had many automatic cars before but this one is a bit of a disappointment as there is too much of a pause when the transmission is changing gears. It tries too hard to be like a manual shift but with less acceleration. I much prefer the older, smoother accord or CRV gear changes. They are much less obvious - Reagon Ramiah from England

Submitted: 13/02/2010 13:23:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Bruce, Hertfordshire

Honda CR-V Ex diesel auto 2009

Rated 5 because the car is still brand new and I am thoroughly enjoying it, model EX diesel auto. Small niggle: The upper cargo shelf rear half does not stay up when loading the floor of the boot so the exercise becomes a bit like loading large items through a deep letterbox or holding the shelf up with the top of ones head! I have overcome this by using a 1 foot long thin metal/plastic rod which lodges between the female part of the catch and a hole in the underside of the shelf, but this Heath Robinson device would not be necessary if the bar holding the tonneau cover was an inch or two further forward. I also had to pay over £300 to have door rubbing strips fitted, as I could envisage other drivers in the car park opening their doors onto the protruding crease on the metal part of my car doors. I would have thought that, especially on the up-market version that I have, the strips, which I reckon both enhance and protect the doors, should have been standard fitments?? Just one more niggle: I feel that the automatic windscreen wipers are lacking an intermittent wipe setting, the auto wipe is not really up to the job of reliably clearing the very misty light rain that an intermittent wipe would easily take care of. I am very pleased with my purchase so far. FYI., you might be interested to hear that I chose this car because it is possible for the driver to exit the vehicle via the front passenger door and vice versa. A very important factor if one is involved in an accident situation where the driver’s door is jammed and/or blocked and even more so, if fire is starting. Also very useful in tight parking or garaging situations. The centre console that most modern cars have fitted seem to me to invite a dangerous or even deadly situation occurring. Finally, will Paul Cook from Warwickshire please answer the question (see 26.11.2008 above) about which brand (s) of diesel he finds give (s) the best results - many thanks. Also, if anyone has any comment to make about bio-diesel, it would also be very interesting. Thanks.

Responses to this review

Update: Disappointed that answer to questions about type/brand of diesel not yet forthcoming, but I live in hope! Going back to the boot situation, I have made a modification to the upper shelf by screwing a black painted aluminium strip to the leading edge of the shelf, so that it projects above the shelf, thereby preventing items from sliding forward and down into the lower boot or under the backs of the rear seats when braking. It looks pretty professional (modesty !!) - the edge of the shelf took the self tapping screws well and the srews do not show. Hope that idea might help someone, or even Honda, if they read this, to do something similar to new CRV’s!! - Bruce Chanter from Hertfordshire

Submitted: 13/02/2010 13:17:59

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Al Mungham, Norfolk

Honda Civic 2.2 CTDI Sport 2006

n the plus side: This car is fantastic to drive, pulls from nowhere, handles well even though it is always fully loaded up. Returns 44mpg, had 50mpg once after doing 70mph along the motorway. Feathering the accelerator helps and not attacking gradients. Love the fact that the headlights behind are lost in the middle of the rear spoiler. I do 3-4000 miles per month and have never have any posture problems. Down side: My car has done 67,000, (30000since July) and has just had a new clutch, brake disks and pads all round at 44,000. Now new tyres, and is in for a new rear wheel bearing this week. Its been costly but fun!!

Responses to this review

I drive a 2.2 iCTDI ES 2006 with 64000 miles recorded. Fuel consumption to work is 45 MPG on a drive to Manchester last year at a steady 70 MPH on the motorway I got 63MPG with the motor only doing 1950 RPM. It will only give you good MPG if you drive it as a diesel should be driven ie. Change UP as soon as possible. Allow the torque to move the car do not rev the engine. Hope that your MPG improves - John Alexander from Renfrewshire

Submitted: 09/02/2010 10:43:02

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Finbar Magee, County Armagh

Honda FR-V 2006

I bought this car for my ex-wife and 4 children. The engine seized with NO WARNING; there is no oil level warning light in this car. Honda deny all responsibility they say it’s in the manual to check every 600 miles, yep, in a manual almost 700 pages long with no emphasis from the manual, dealer nor at service. Even my 12 year old Corsa had an oil level warning system. The oil pressure gauge in this vehicle comes on when the damage is done. "THE POWER OR DREAMS??" - MORE LIKE "THE STUFF OF NIGHTMARES" £17,000 DOWN THE TUBES!

Responses to this review

Couldn’t you check the dipstick then? Ben Stokes from England

Submitted: 01/02/2010 19:49:32

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ian Sinclair, Suffolk

Honda Jazz Sport CVT 2005

When the new model Jazz came along in 2009, I tried the i-shift version. I had never realised that a gearbox could be so bad, and I told them. I still use the CVT, despite two letters asking if I would sell it back to the dealers (what could I replace it with?) Since it keeps going, I’ll wait until Honda comes to its collective senses (and I don’t fancy the extra weight and complication of a hybrid).

Responses to this review

How great to read this review. I have had a Jazz for 3 years with the CVT and have to say that it has been a most enjoyable car to drive. Hence when I saw the new model with that panaramic roof panel, I thought I would investigate further. Went to Honda garage where I was offered a good price for my 07 Jazz as well as what I thought was a good "cost to change". Everything was going well untill I had a test drive....and OH DEAR HOW AWFUL. The new "automatic" system the i-shift proved to be AWFUL. I was told you had to learn to drive it! I even wrote direct to Honda and was told more or less the same. IT’S AN AUTOMATIC !!!!! which means in my book means you do not expect to do anything but point it and go, not have to watch the revs and feather the throttle for goodness sake. PLEASE PLEASE Honda either bring back the CVT, or take a leaf out of BMW’s book because they are able to produce a SMOOTH automatic drive. I am so sad as I really wanted to buy the new Jazz but no way could I put up with that gear box - Debs Allan from Rhondda Cynon Taff

Submitted: 27/01/2010 19:38:25

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Derek Bell, Surrey

Honda Insight 2009

I had the chance of driving the Honda Insight on several occasions in late 2009 through a rental firm, so while I don’t own an Insight I’ve driven one for a several days. I remember reading the usual car reviews when it was launched and it took a bit of a beating, and while it isn’t a thrilling car it’s perfectly easy to drive. As long as you keep things simply then the car does exactly what you would expect. I wasn’t particularly concerned with fuel economy but it seemed pretty good, while its exception from the dreaded London congestion charge was the real reason for the loan! Overall, not an exciting car but its pretty economical and does its job fine.

Submitted: 27/01/2010 15:57:50

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Hartingdon, Yorkshire

Honda CR-V ES 2008

Hi. Done 33,000 in mine. Turbo is noisy, can sound like a passing police car with its siren on! Dealer says it is acceptable. Had issues with no electric, flat battery. AA had to lift car and deliver to the dealer (Stratstone) The AA man said a recall had been initiated as the battery was not up to the job and needed replacing. But he did not think that this was the problem. Before he lifted onto the flatbed, he did get it restarted, but the belt ceased with much screaching and smoke, obviously NOT the battery then, but something more serious. I had some issues previously with the aircon, all this information was provided to the dealer, and the car was left with them for 2 days. On collection they had replaced the battery and nothing else, this despite my and the AA man strongly suggesting that this was NOT the issue. After a week the same thing happened again, AA called out, CRV lifted onto flatbed and taken to the same unfortunate dealer, who still did not beleive either me ot the AA man as to the trouble. After nearly a week they evetually conceded that the Aircon was the culprit, and they apologised to me! Out of interest, I was looking to obtain one for my wife, and emailed 3 seperate Stratstone dealers for details of used vehicles I had seen on the Honda/Dealer web site, none of them returned my emails, address not known, and this was via their own email enquiry card! I still love the CRV and would/will get another, but the Dealers, oh dear, they do not do themselves any favours.

Responses to this review

Same happened to my late 2007 2.2D ES. Broke down needing AA a few times. Dealer changed battery, broke down again. Dealer then incorrectly blamed towbar electrics until I insisted they went around the car with a tooth comb and uncovered shot aircon contactor, apparently a known CR-V problem (along with the IMRC valve) - Anthony Hall from Derbyshire

I had battery problems when my 2.2 CRV (207) was a couple of years old. Stratstone in Leeds knew what the problem was and upgraded the software, it seems ’something’ was not completely switching off and the upgrade fixed it; took about an hour while I waited - John Thompson from Yorkshire

I have a 2007 CRV 2.2 i-CTDI 140 EX and it’s a lovely car but it doesn’t live up to Honda’s excellent reliabity record, in my opinion. I put my car in my garage one night and everything was switched off, but the next morning I went back out to it and the battery was dead, so I got it pushed out and hooked up to my sons Peugeot 407 and then it started. Also in the cold morning I could hear a whine coming from the igniton when accelerating, I told my Honda dealer about this but they refused to believe me! More recently the whole Sat Nav/ Radio/ CD player screen has been freezing on me... I had a older CRV before this and it was an amzing car! Overall its OK but not the best effort from Honda - Cilian Sleeth from County Tyrone

Submitted: 23/01/2010 19:35:39

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Pat Maguire, County Down

Honda CR-V 2.2 iCTDi 140 EX CMBS 2007

This is a car that’s very hard to fault, Yes the Tiguan, Kuga etc., is better looking and the Freelander wins off road but for everyday use ( Shopping, School run, Family days out etc...) the crv makes the most sense!! Its got the huge and practical cabin to hold all your parifinalia and has got the power to a our huge caravan no matter how big the hills are. Its also got the most room inside for all of these small urban SUVs and it has all the others trumped for build quality and reliability because its a HONDA!! I looked at all the sensible alternatives and the Jeep car that came close was the Peugeot 4007 2.2 HDI GT. Only reason I didnt buy the 4007 was because you cannot fault a Honda for reliability. The 4007 was really quick (0-60Mph, 9.7 Seconds) and felt more refined/ car like to drive but you cannot beat A Honda!

Submitted: 22/01/2010 10:08:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Helen Pollard, Lancashire

Honda Civic 2005

Car looks great and has some good gadgets - I like the radio volume going up and down depending on speed of car. However, very poor visibility all round, poor acceleration and very noisy, hard ride and dreadful in recent snow. I had to abandon while other cars were managing to get up a slight hill. Would not recommend.

Submitted: 21/01/2010 09:17:36

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Taylor, Derbyshire

Honda Civic 2.2 diesel 2006

I’ll keep this short... On the plus sides, great trick seating.. boot space very good, handles superb and looks stunning... Now on the down side... We bought the car from a Honda main dealer in Derby for £10,300 last August (2009). It was a Honda Civic 2.2 diesel, full history, 49,500 miles and basically in mint condition. Now, 4k later, it’s required... 2 new tyres, wiper arms and motor, driver’s side mirror as it packed up, cruise control solaniod, reversing sensor and rear bulbs. But most of all it needs a new clutch. This isn’t a gripe at the car because we love it to bits but its reliabilty and customer service need to be looked at for sure. For instance, even though the car’s still under warranty, Lookers in Derby still want us to pay for the clutch!!!! £1200 after 4000 miles!

Submitted: 20/01/2010 15:57:44

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Den Needler, London

Honda Civic 2.2 ex diesel 2007

Had my civic for just over a year and on first glance the car was very good but as you drive it more and more you find its faults as listed below; * suspension is loud and unrefined (problem with bump stops) * Some annoying rattles on dash * hands free microphone inadequate * THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE BEING THAT THE 2.2TD HAS A FAULTY CLUTCH WHICH CANNOT HANDLE THE TORQUE OF THE ENGINE FROM 2000 TO 4000 RPM AND WILL SLIP ON MOST. HONDA WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS AND SO YOU COULD BE CHARGED UP TO £1500 FOR A REPAIR. PLEASE SEE THE CIVINFO WEBSITE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS Because of this I have now sold my civic, hope this helps anyone thinking of buying a diesel civic

Responses to this review

After 22,000 miles my Civic developed the same clutch problem, repaired under warranty, also new temp sensor at around the same time. Now at 42,000 miles, same problem again with the clutch, not covered anymore (outside 3 year warranty period). Needing a new clutch every 20k or so miles makes me wish I had bought my second choice, a Golf TDi and stayed away from the ’reliable’ Honda brand - Dave Fish from Warwickshire

Submitted: 13/01/2010 12:00:28

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Marc, Bedfordshire

Honda Jazz SE Sport 2005

Superb, practical car. Gearbox bearing failure must be related to how one drives. Mine got noisy at 120,000 or so and the bearings were replaced then. The car has now done over 150,000 miles, returns 44mpg and has required no other work apart from normal service items. OK, so it’s not the fastest, the ride’s a bit bouncy and the low profile tyres are easily punctured but reliability and practicality are second to none.

Submitted: 03/01/2010 14:10:17

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Karen Vaughan, Inverness-shire

Honda Logo 2001

Had my Honda logo for 2years, what a gem, only had 2 new tyres. Very economical, fast, bags of room, would certainly recommend.

Submitted: 31/12/2009 19:44:30

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Zoli Szép, Cardiff

Honda HR-V 4 wd 3 doors 1999

I have had some Land Rovers before. I have a mile long, non covered road to my house. With light offroad tyres it’s the same performance as in much bigger (and unfortunately heavier) jeeps. It’s just a question of physics and traction, not trade-marks and names.

Responses to this review

Hi, do you still have this car? I would love to hear your opinion. Legyszi irj a bcsabiz kukac yahoo pont com-ra - Csaba Bajcsi from England

Submitted: 16/12/2009 22:13:51

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jack Johnson, Caerphilly

Honda Jazz ES I-Shift 2009

I upgraded from the CVT version and find this new car to be more fun to drive. The CVT was smoother but the i-shift works well too. From a cold start I use the manual option, in order to change up rapidly, then shift it into automatic when the car is warmed up. Only once have I opted to shift down manually, when facing a very steep descent. At all other times I let the i-shift do its job in automatic, and cannot fault its performance. I commonly carry a folding wheelchair behind the front seats; this leaves the ’boot’ space free for other luggage. With the rear seats down, the new Jazz will also carry an electric invalid carriage, with plenty of spare room for shopping. The driver’s seat can be raised much higher than in the old version, giving a panoramic outlook to rival an MPV. Only one complaint, and it’s a minor one, like its predecessor the new Jazz still gives a somewhat jittery ride over poor surfaces, but I forgive it since in all other respects the car is ideal. I love it.

Submitted: 10/12/2009 11:19:52

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tony Robson, England

Honda Jazz 1.4 EX i-Shift 2009

Having bought my Jazz last February I have found it meets all my needs. I agree the i-Shift is ’differant, but no more than that. Having read my handbook and taken the trouble and time to practice using the i-shift - it works well, folks! Do not expect it to operate as other well established automatics.

Responses to this review

Fair point, but not all drivers that buy this car have driven a manual. Or hold a manual licence. This car is very popular with people of retirement age. An I-Drive only version is not practical for people looking for a smooth drive. It is directed at the Sports models, and that type of driver for a more involved drive - John from Hampshire

Submitted: 03/12/2009 22:10:53

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Keith Jackson, Yorkshire

Honda Jazz esi 2009

This is a great Car and my 14th Honda! I started aound 1972/3 with a Honda N600, then a Honda Z, then one of he first Honda Civics in York. Since them I have had two other Civics, a Honda 600 truck, four Honda preludes, a Honda H-RV and a Honda C-RV. I’ve now got the Jazz, which I’ve had 10 days. I’ve only been let down once by one of their Preludes, which let me down with the petrol pump but then redeemed itself on the drive. Great Cars.

Submitted: 23/11/2009 13:50:45

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Kidd, Middlesex

Honda Jazz 2002

I bought a 2002 Jazz from autotrader 1 year ago. I’m very pleased with my purchase, even though EGR valve failed shortly after I bought it and I have had to replace a driver door lock which seized solid, both common faults in a second hand jazz I understand. These problems aside I do not contemplate too many more. It drives very well and is very well equipped. It has more than enough space for 4 adults and averages 48 miles to the gallon. I have to take into account that I paid only £2600 for a very good car, which should now prove a reliable runaround for my rather tall kids.

Submitted: 02/11/2009 21:46:12

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

beefy39, Kent

Honda FR-V 2004

After only 45,000 miles my clutch has packed up, repair bill £900,00 plus, which obviously leaves one out of pocket. Quite a disappointment considering Honda’s reputation.

Responses to this review

My clutch started slipping at about 55,000 in 4th and in 3rd when accelerating hard. Never had any problems in Fords or Renaults (previous cars older than the Honda) though this is definitely the most powerful engine I’ve had (2.2 diesel). I do not drive normally with a "high torque" style so am disappointed. Could the clutch system just be not beefy enough for the engine and car weight? - Andy from Buckinghamshire

I loved my Honda FR-V (2.0L), until the clutch ’burnt out’ at 30000 miles! I am a middle aged gran, I do not ’slip’ or ’ride’ the clutch, and am not a ’boy racer’! VERY DISAPPOINTED, not covered under warranty, nearly £1000 repair bill with Honda dealer. My Mazda 626 has 150000 miles on clock, had it for 14 years, 1 clutch replacement. No more Honda’s for me! - Mary C from Angus (Forfarshire)

Submitted: 27/10/2009 08:33:33

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Kenneth Smith, Nottinghamshire

Honda Jazz 2009

Went for a test drive. Must say that the i-shift "auto"is dreadful compared with my truly automatic 1.4, 3-year old Jazz. Also,the dealer wanted to add on £175 for not having a spare wheel! Think again Honda.

Submitted: 13/10/2009 09:29:11

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Lees, Stirlingshire

Honda Jazz Sport. 2006

I have had this car since Sept 2006 [my second one] and it has never let me down. It now has 37,000 miles on the clock and so far all I’ve replaced is the two front tyres and the windscreen wipers. I easily get 45 MPG . It’s amazing what you can get into the back with seats folded flat. My only complaints are dear servicing, no engine temperature gauge [you get blue and red symbols to let you know if the engine’s cold or hot] and a space saver wheel. Also the car isn’t the quickest. Apart from that it’s great.

Submitted: 18/09/2009 09:28:26

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Cr, Essex

Honda Civic Hybrid 2009

Asked company to supply me my Civic Hybrid, mainly due to the tax I was paying on the Merc C 220 I had. All I can say is WOW!!! This car is roomy, although the boot suffers a little due to the baterry pack, but interior is comfortable for 4 adults. The spec on the car is absolutely fantastic and better than the Merc with bluetooth for the phone and built in sat nav and VOICE CONTROL! This is a great car delivering over 45MPG in town and up to 65 MPG on a run and more than comfortable enough for me to do London to Edinburgh with only one break (and that was because I needed the bathroom). All this and only £15 per year road tax and no congestion charge!!!!! Worth it just for that (although you do still have to pay a £10 per year exemption fee - the robbing b********). Only one problem was that some toerag decided to key the nearside from bonnet to boot! This car has impressed me so much I have just bought a Jazz for the wife, and I am thinking of getting myself a 2.4 Accord (for fun).

Responses to this review

Have had my Civic Hybrid for three years and everything OK (except claimed mpg vastly exagerated). Recently have had the AA out 4 times for electrical faults and failure to start. Now keep getting warning lights. Would never consider buting Honda again. Previously had five Nissans - not a single fault in nine years - Ken Baker from Yorkshire

Submitted: 14/09/2009 10:13:25

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Hughes, Durham

Honda Civic 2008

I agree with the mpg figures. I struggle to reach 46 unless I drive at a steady 56mph. Once I get onto a motorway it is 44 mpg.

Submitted: 06/08/2009 08:48:41

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Dave, Surrey

Honda Jazz 1.4 ES manual 2009

Although I have owned my Jazz for just one month and clocked up only 480 miles, mainly on B roads in Surrey and Sussex, I can honestly say that it is a delight to drive. The seats are really comfortable, better than some of the more expensive cars I’ve owned. Close inspection reveals good fit and finish, no squeaks or rattles and taken over all, a well built little car. Must go, I’m of for a drive, just for the fun of it.

Submitted: 04/08/2009 16:01:22

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Kim Davies, Surrey

Honda Jazz i-shift 2009

I agree with Colin Horey - the i-shift in auto mode is dreadful. Previously I had a Jazz Sport Auto which I loved. I’ve even considered exchanging my new Jazz for the previous model!

Submitted: 04/08/2009 09:38:28

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Lindsay Trim, Scotland

Honda Civic 1.4 2002

I bought my car in Dec 2002 new after my test drive, I thought the gear lever was amazing for my frozen shoulder. Had owned 5 Toyota’s before so expected good reliability from a Japanese maker, although my first Honda. Very impressed. Have had about 7 years faultless, no problem ownership. Car is spacious inside, dealt with 35 mile morning school run with 4 passengers including 3 leggy teenage boys in back with no problem and all their school bags and musical instruments. Very much aided by no transmission tunnel. (Why have Honda changed this?) Still love driving my car and at only 57,000 miles on the clock might just keep her for a while yet. My husband has Toyota Yaris (05) and the build quality is nothing like my Honda. Will definitely look at Honda again when I have to say goodbye.

Submitted: 23/07/2009 09:00:35

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Bryce, Scotland

Honda Logo 2000

Prompted to write a brief review when I read the one which said this model was rubbish. We’ve had our Logo from new in 2000 and had not one bit of trouble from it in 9 years. It is deceptively spacious with plenty of leg and headroom, and has air conditioning, power steering etc. which back then was unusual for a small car. Very comfortable on long journeys and economic on fuel. We usually replace our car every few years or so but not felt the need to change this one. Based on our experience, this is a great car.

Submitted: 22/07/2009 10:08:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Horey Colin, England

Honda Jazz ishift 2009

Having just read Ian Sinclair’s report on the Jazz ishift I have to agree. In auto mode it is absolutely terrible. I have had the car 4 weeks and used it mainly in manual. My previous Jazz was auto which I had 4 years. I am very sorry I bought this. Honda should go back to the drawing board and design a good auto.

Submitted: 20/07/2009 15:16:21

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Peter Dabbs, Lincolnshire

Honda Jazz 2008

The way Roger Ashton of London has been told to set the handbrake is quite correct. Press firmly of the footbrake and pull the handbrake lever up without operating the release button. This is the instruction given in the drivers manual for the Corsa D and a Ford Fiesta 1.6 diesel which I owned recently. As a driver instructor I have been teaching this method for some time now and find that the handbrake is far more efficient. You can soften the sound simply by curling a finger underneath the button. Although this method is still queried by some driving examiners I am sure the manufacturers know best !

Submitted: 09/07/2009 09:11:19

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Julian Dolman, Worcestershire

Honda Jazz 2008

Can Roger Ashton of London whose aunt had problems with the Jazz handbrake please get in touch - forgemill@btinternet.com. Thank you. Julian Dolman.

Submitted: 11/06/2009 11:14:25

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Derek Woodland, England

Honda Accord Saloon 2004

Had my accord now for nearly 5 years, very happy with it, looks great after I added 18" alloys, with Michelin sport low pro tyres. I was disappointed when it went in for a service to be told I needed new rear pads AND discs, after only 20,000 miles. Still, nothing else has gone wrong, I treat my Accord very carefully and drive my wife’s Honda Jazz most of the time in town. I have an in built Honda sat nav and also a sunroof which I enjoy. I feel this car is very reliable at all times. The rear pads and discs has been the the only thing that has needed attention in five years, so I am happy with that.

Submitted: 11/06/2009 11:07:09

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

James Randall, Warwickshire

Honda S2000 GT 2006

If, two years ago, you had asked me what my best ever purchase was I would have waxed lyrical about my superb espresso machine. The delicious blends, the excellent crema, the wonderful aromas but most importantly, its magnificent ability to wake me up in the morning. However, two years ago I made what is now the best purchase of my life; forget caffeine, all you need to wake yourself up in the morning is a Honda S2000! The S2000 looks sleek, sexy and sophisticated and that is because it is. The feeling as you slip into the cockpit is of a snug rocket ship, which is in fact, what it is. The acceleration is electric and as you zoom past 6000 rpm and the VTEC kicks in, the feeling is like being shot in the groin with a taser, if that is a brilliant feeling? The S2000 is responsive and exhilarating in every one of its gears and feels as though you are glued to the road at all times. There is hardly any roll in the corners and at every point it feels composed and secure. I have really pushed the boundaries in this car and I have never been disappointed. As for the practicality, one has to remember it is a sports car; lets face it, it won’t be much help when you are moving house. Also, if you are planning to go on holiday, it had better be to a naturist retreat where you won’t require clothes, because any more than a small case will be a struggle. But before I make it sound like the boot space is non-existent, golf fans, you will be pleased to hear that your clubs will fit! If I were to leave you with one thought it would be this: I still smile when I drive it, I still stare at it as I walk to and from it in the carpark, and I still miss it when I am not driving it. As I said, the S2000 is the best purchase of my life.

Submitted: 01/06/2009 14:17:43

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Arthur Bayley, England

Honda Civic 2.2 Diesel 2007

This is my wife’s company car, thank goodness. If we’d bought this I’d be really hacked off. I think this is a seriously flawed car, and potentially dangerous. As follows: general visibility awful and rear visibility appalling (I know some one who had to change their route to work as he couldn’t see to pull out at a junction!), not helped by no wiper to remove rain on the daft rear screen, very harsh ride and noisy too, poor access as people including myself/wife keep banging heads getting in, can’t get 47 mpg. Over 20k miles on all types of route (54 advertised), poor boot space, air con very noisy and complicated. The good points: very torquey engine minimises gear changes and gives good acceleration. Overall I wouldn’t touch one again and recommend a very long test drive to weigh up if it suits you. Goodness knows what the design team was thinking of when this was approved!

Responses to this review

Poor boot space you say? Strange comment as it has the biggest boot in its class by far, boosted by the wonderfully flexible "magic seating." I do wonder if you are talking about the same car. You keep on banging your head getting in? That says more about you I'm afraid than the car design. Visibility awful, suggests that your eyes need attention and as for the rear view this has proved to be no problem at all for any competent driver. My comments are based on 3 years ownership of a Civic which has proved to be reliable economical comfortable and great fun. You ask what the design team were thinking of well it certainly wasn't someone like you or the type of person you mention that had to change his route because he couldn't pull out at a junction. It would be safer for all if he used public transport - Alan from Sussex

I totally agree with whoever Alan from Sussex is. The civic is a fine car, This man Arthur, must need his eyes tested because the visibility is perfect. You know what to do if its so bad, GET RID OF IT - Ciaran from County Antrim

Submitted: 29/05/2009 10:08:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Steve Finnerty, Hampshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.2 CTDI Executive 2004

Ran this car for 3 years and found it good value, economical, but a bit lacking in soul! The engine was responsive and quick enough with a nice linear power delivery but still sounded like a diesel despite all the hype. Averaged 42-45 MPG, slightly disappointing but not bad considering my driving style and I found switching off the powerful aircon worth at least 2-3MPG on a long run. Had a problem with smoking on start up that was never fully resolved. If left to stand for more than a day used to emit a large puff of white smoke on start up. Suspect this was down to an oil seal in the engine but Honda never got that far into the investigation before I handed the car back. It used a couple of litres of oil between services which may have pointed to the problem although this was considered acceptable. The other issue I had was with the paint quality that was easily marked and small scratches were noticeable especially as my dark blue colour seemed quite thin which uncovered the undercoat. That said the car was 100% reliable over 70000 miles, had an excellent driving position, comfortable seats, was roomy enough for my family and well equipped with Sat-Nav, Sunroof, Leather Trim and in dash CD Changer. It handled well and was not too bad on tyres 20K for the fronts and 40K for the rears although the fronts did wear prematurely on the inside. The ride was very inconsistent sometimes good but never settled properly on the motorway. I suspect this was due to the 17" alloys fitted that greatly improve the looks but I suspect most of the development by Honda was done on the standard 16" wheels. That said the ride and handling were also noticeably better on the replacement Dunlop tyres compared with the original Bridgestone’s. All in all a stylish and reliable car with some niggly faults.

Submitted: 29/05/2009 09:55:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Noreen Dane, County Antrim

Honda Civic 2008

It’s Japanese so therefore quality is as good as you’ll find anywhere. Even being built in Britain doesn’t stop it being one of the most robust cars in its class, and the most user friendly car I have ever had the privilege of owning.

Submitted: 29/05/2009 09:44:42

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ray Fielding, Cheshire

Honda Civic 2001

Great car. Well made. No problems. Only gripe is NO acceleration.

Submitted: 15/05/2009 09:28:44

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Robert Little, Dorset

Honda Jazz 2007

I am on my second Jazz, the first time I have bought a second car. Local use or trips to Scotland from Dorset - a doddle. Next replacement - yes - a Jazz.

Submitted: 11/05/2009 08:59:36

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Will Henry, Yorkshire

Honda Jazz 1.4EX 2008

Unbelievably good car with space that far exceeds that of many in a class above. Practicality cannot be bettered, this is simply the most useful small car you can buy. Terrific engine, especially with a few miles on the clock and never gives less than 50mpg. EX variant is very well equipped and is worth the extra money to get climate control and the like. Great design, fantastic build and excellent to drive. Also totally reliable. The complete opposite of its predecessor (Toyota Yaris) in every respect.

Submitted: 08/05/2009 14:53:10

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Wade R, Nottinghamshire

Honda FR-V 2005

Since buying the 2.0 litre FR-V the only bad thing I can say is the fuel consumption is a bit high but we love the fact that we get all our family in with loads of room for luggage in the back. Even more impressive is the great backup service we get from our Honda dealer and the warranty covered up to 90,000 miles.

Submitted: 01/05/2009 15:27:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Roger Ashton, London

Honda Jazz Mach 2009 2008

My aunt bought a brand new (March 2009) Jazz ES 1.4 i-VTEC (Petrol) i-SHIFT. She applied the hand brake in the normal way and left the car, when she returned she found the car had move from the position in which she left it. On reporting it to the supplier, they said you must NOT use the button on the hand brake; you must click it through the ratchet. This is not something we were taught to do, as we are told the ratchet will wear out and not work. Comments on this would be appreciated

Submitted: 20/04/2009 13:15:00

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Keith Watton, Staffordshire

Honda Jazz 1.2DSI 2007

Bought new 2007. I had 3 of the old style Civics previously. No problems with the car it does what it says on the tin. 1.2 engine not very powerful but hey what can you expect from a car that achieves 64/65 miles per gallon on a run and over 50 miles per gallon overall. I would recommend this car to anyone.

Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:23:38

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Henry, Ayrshire

Honda CR-V 2008

Is it me??? This would be a great car which ticks a lot of boxes. It is a very comfortable ride, with tight suspension and low engine noise, well laid out with lots of bells and whistles (2009 ES model). A 6th gear and cruise control with good torque. However, the car I test drove had quite audible wind noise on driver’s side, some of the plasticky bits were very plasticky looking, road noise was greater than my 2003 RAV4 and amazingly the gear change was clunky. Help, I really wanted to but this one.

Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:10:03

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Darren Owen, Shropshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.4 TYPE S 2006

Absolute brilliant car. The 2.4 Type S is the same engine as the Civic Type R so it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing but with the comfort of an executive car. It’s just coming up to 3 years old now and never had a problem. Looking at upgrading to the new model but only because I want what’s new.

Responses to this review

Same engine?? No it isnt - John from England

Submitted: 02/03/2009 09:40:51

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul Blaney, County Down

Honda Civic Type R 2005

I have owned a Civic Type R now for three and a half years, and I can safely say without any shadow of a doubt that it is by far the beast car I have ever owned. I get the same thrill driving down country lanes now as I did when I first brought the car. The road holding is absolutely superb, no matter now hard you push the car into a corner it just cries out for more. The six speed gear box means fuel consumption is very good at normal drive speeds giving a respectable 32-34 mpg. Reliability has been second to none with faultless motoring all the way. It is still as taught as the day it left the showroom. Inside there are no squeaks or rattles you would get in some other cars of a similar age, yet again a true example of Honda’s brilliant build quality. The Type R is a car that a person can have even if you are married and need extra family space during the week and still want to have a bit of fun driving at weekends or to take to a track day. The Type R has been at the top of the pile among the hot hatches now for quite some time and shows no sign of letting its crown slip into the hands of the GTI, ST, AND RS’s of this world. And with 2001 models on the market now at sensible money its makes a good fun weekend car too.

Submitted: 02/03/2009 09:36:39

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Sheila, Berkshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE CVT 2004

I have always been extremely happy with my Jazz, particularly with the space and fuel economy. I was disappointed however to have the rear wheel bearings replaced at 35K miles at a cost of £400. Not something I was expecting so early in my car’s life. I understand this is not uncommon having looked at the internet.

Submitted: 06/02/2009 09:13:35

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Aaron Solo, England

Honda Stream SE Sport 2002

Great driving experience, very easy to use. Nice if you don’t want a massive vehicle just to transport the kids on short (school run) journeys. The engine is whisper smooth and very reliable. Would have preferred to buy diesel if Honda made one in this - that then would have ticked all the boxes. Not a lot of boot storage for long trips, but that’s not really why we bought this. There’s enough space for the weekly shopping trips, even with the kids in tow. Friend has a Zafira and although may be slightly more roomy, and flexible he has had problems with it. I’d rather have something which is miles more reliable and much easier to drive. Less boring than a Zafira too, these Stream’s are quite rare so hold their value well.

Submitted: 27/01/2009 09:06:06

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ian Sinclair, Suffolk

Honda Jazz Jazz ES 2008

It’s a lovely car for anyone who drives a manual. The "auto" version (i-shift) is, however, abominable. I never thought I could ever criticise a Honda for the way it drives, but the ES i-shift was both sluggish and jerky. Rather like being driven in a manual with a very bad gear-change. It felt slow to get away, with a back-jerk at each gear change, as if I were stabbing the brake at each change up. My options are to keep the old CVT (smooth and nippy) or look for another small automatic that is truly automatic.

Submitted: 22/01/2009 10:22:06

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ahmet Nurettin, Hertfordshire

Honda Civic 1.8i SE VTEC 2008

Bought my HONDA CIVIC 1.8i SE VTEC manual 2 weeks ago brand new. I have loved every minute of driving it. It is one cool motor that turns many heads, especially as it is a gleaming black colour. Only fault is as many other reports - poor rear visibility and no rear wiper. I have found the drive comfortable with great road handling, acceleration and responsiveness. I have not yet noticed good fuel economy as in the spec and other reviews state? Overall truly the hot hatch to beat on the market.

Submitted: 20/01/2009 16:01:08

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Lorella Romanelli, England

Honda Shuttle es 2.2 swiss 1997

The car on the YouTube video is MY Honda Shuttle. I released the video 2 years ago. Now my car has 130,000 km and I regret that I have to sell it. It was a wonderful ride for 12 years. I’m writing from Swiss, please forgive me for my English.

Submitted: 19/01/2009 09:35:32

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul R, Northumberland

Honda Logo 1.3 2000

We have owned the car for 5 years and it has only had a new battery and 2 tyres in all that time - superb car!

Submitted: 08/01/2009 10:15:48

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

James Logie, Fife and Kinross Shires

Honda Jazz 1.4 se 2004

Car is easy to drive and has been trouble free for 4 and a half years. Full Honda service history. Car bought from new, service costs can be high. Just touched 55000miles without any major repair, only brakes [second set all round only 50% worn], tyres etc. [15000mls front replacement]. Only gains 2 stars as gearbox bearings have failed at 55k so you can imagine the cost of repair. Ensure you take out a warranty after the manufacturers warranty ends. Awaiting reply from Honda UK as I believe this should not have happened. Won’t hold my breath but I will raise the star rating if Honda assist and keep my custom. The new Jazz looks good but if build quality is in question what will the future costs be?

Responses to this review

I wish I could have got that far! My gearbox bearing failed after only 13,500 miles! My fault for being a low mileage driver, as the warranty had expired the year before. Honda paid labour charges, but I had to pay out for another £113, plus various other charges, for what I consider to be faulty original parts! Reading on the Internet I find that gearbox bearing failure on the Jazz is is not unknown, and I have heard from a good source that it is due to side- loading when the clutch is depressed; that I cannot comment upon. I bought my Honda on the basis of its great reliability record, and am disappointed. Yes, it is a great car otherwise, but now I do not think I would buy another, you must have confidence in a car - Michael Simmons from Buckinghamshire

Submitted: 07/01/2009 11:23:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Alister Monro, Bedfordshire

Honda Accord Tourer 2 litre petrol EX 2004

This is one of the best cars I have owned, but perhaps not the most inspiring. It’s a big car for a 2 litre motor and true to Honda form, you have to rev it if you want to overtake or take off quickly. It is economical, quiet and comfortable and has all the bells and whistles. So far, it’s been totally reliable and the only deterioration in finish has been the alloys which have corroded quite badly. Highly recommended.

Submitted: 07/01/2009 11:13:32

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul Cooke, Warwickshire

Honda CR-V 2.2CDi 2008

Something was lost in my review... For 80000 read 8000 What a difference a 0 makes!! Still a good car though. I will write again when it reaches 80000 (2018 I reckon).

Submitted: 28/11/2008 08:42:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Paul Cooke, Warwickshire

Honda CR-V CTDi 2.2 2007

Now 11 months old with 80000mls on the clock. No complaints at all except perhaps the position of the odd control button or two. One observation however... The engine is very sensitive to different makes of diesel. This sounds odd, but through experience I have found that certain makes of fuel can lower mpg by up to 20%. Engine noise also varies according to fuel, especially at low revs. I have spoken to other CR-V owners, and they agree with my observations... So shop around and see which compromise you prefer. My car is returning an average over 11 months of 43 mpg... not bad for mostly short trips in city. I would recommend the CR-V without reservation.

Responses to this review

I would be interested to know which brand of fuel was found to be the best - John Davenport from England

The quality standards on diesel are very lax compared with those of petrol grades. The same problem can occur with all diesel engines depending on the load of fuel. I fill up 99% of the time at the same pumps and can always tell when its a dodgy fill. Today it’s very good - John thompson from Yorkshire

Submitted: 26/11/2008 11:41:50

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Arthur Hamilton, Renfrewshire

Honda CR-V CRV ES Auto 2007

I’ve had this car for nearly 2 years and overall it has been a happy experience. The handling on this vehicle is excellent, much more car like than most 4x4’s. I read a comment about the performance from the petrol/auto combination and can only conclude that the author must have been carrying lead bars as it is more than adequate for all situations. My previous cars include a Volvo V70 R and a BMW 750i and whilst it clearly doesn’t match these 2 it has never been found wanting. My only criticism is that the interior plastics could be of a higher standard, they are relatively hard and cheap to the touch.

Submitted: 25/11/2008 09:27:03

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Lex Jackson, Middlesex

Honda Jazz Auto 2003

Very economical, very roomy and practical. A/C failed after 49,000 miles. Also this has 8 spark plugs, local garage (not Honda) did not know, eventually burnt out the 2 coils....... Costly, but a brilliant car. Sold after 5 years for 1/2 of new cost.

Submitted: 12/11/2008 09:42:14

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Lynn Hodd, England

Honda HR-V CVT 2002

There is a fault with the start clutch on the gearbox of the Honda HR-V which means it needs replacing in under 10 years. If you have a model before 2002 it is covered with a 10 year warranty but after 2002 for only 7 years.

Submitted: 12/11/2008 09:29:44

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ken, Cheshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 dsi 2003

This was my wife’s company car until very recently when she purchased it from the company! The car is now five years old and other than routine servicing has only ever had tyres, wiper blades etc. It has sailed through its two MOTs and has never failed to start on first turn of the key. Fuel consumption is approximately 50mpg and on the motorway will cruise no problem at 70 all day. I sometimes have to check the rev counter at traffic lights etc to see if the engine is still going as it is that quiet.The bodywork keeps remarkably well and looks as good as new after a visit to the local hand car wash. Interior is extremely spacious given the exterior dimensions and the general interior feel is quality without being luxurious.We have enjoyed our "little Jazz" and my wife treats it as one of the family its that dependable. Finally my company car is a brand new Golf TDI 170 bhp which on the motorway is exceptional, but when I am going out locally I still find myself reaching for the Honda keys knowing I will come back smiling (all of you Jazz owners know what I mean).

Submitted: 27/10/2008 09:25:09

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Dudio Ludio, Swansea

Honda Jazz 1.4 LS 2008

I was thinking which car to buy instead of my Citroen Xantia as a second car for my family (kids 7+9) for long journeys and holidays (we decided to keep 12 year old Citroen Ax for city rides) and was very disappointed when first saw JAZZ because it was small in dimensions comparing to Xantia. But my friend who have had it for several years just said: go inside and try to drive it and ask the dealer agent to show you all that can be done inside it (all positions and tricks with seats). I was really surprised with its possibility on the road but also huge space inside. So when I took my wife on a test drive she said that we don’t have to look at other cars (price of new Jazz was 13.460 EUR) because she loves it at first sight. After a few minutes of discussion in front of the dealers shop we agreed to buy it - no regrets. When I was buying the Xantia I spent several months trying to decide what car I’ll buy. We really can’t wait the day Jazz will be delivered to us.

Submitted: 20/10/2008 11:02:17

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

George Lyon, Yorkshire

Honda CR-V good 2008

Noise, turbo. my new Honda CR-V diesel has only done 4100 miles and is on its third turbo and this one is even noisier than the last one but I can not fault my CR-V apart from the turbo. Is this a one off?

Submitted: 20/10/2008 10:52:18

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Nicola Scott, Berwickshire

Honda Jazz 2005

Great car, well worth the money . Fuel is a lot cheaper than my old car. It is good for room in the boot and smooth running.

Submitted: 15/09/2008 10:34:18

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Adrian Giddins, Berkshire

Honda CR-V CTDI 2005

This is my second Honda but first CR-V. I decided on a diesel and CR-V having read many of the reviews on this and other sites. It was a fairly high mileage example and was not cheap having the leather upholstery, but the body work and interior was in very good condition. I’m afraid I don’t like the look of the new version. I find it a quiet car, particularly on motorways with plenty of power for normal driving. All the controls fall easily to hand and the handling on winding roads perfectly acceptable with plenty of interior space although I agree it is very "plasticy". The only downside is on the front passenger foot well where it is not possible for an average height person to sit normally with their legs out and heels resting on the carpet, an intrusion onto the well forces anybody but the smallest to bend their knees and keep their feet flat on the floor. So far I get reasonable fuel consumption and am perfectly happy with the car although am about to have the clutch master cylinder replaced as it squeaks like mad. My dealer informs me this is a known problem.

Submitted: 09/09/2008 09:54:39

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Simon Stokes, Flintshire

Honda S2000 2007

I haven’t stopped smiling since I got it. It makes a fantastic noise when revved passed 6000 rpm and goes like hell in in first 4 gears. After that you’ve usually run out of road!! 12 months old & I haven’t had a spanner on it, no rattles or loose trim. Low 30’s possible when driven normally on A roads, 28 when pushed, which is acceptable. Everyone should own one once. Its the best fun outside the bedroom you will ever have.

Submitted: 15/08/2008 09:24:38

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ifty Hussain, London

Honda Civic ES 1.8i VTEC 2007

Have had the beauty for 24hrs and am REALLY happy with it. ; )) My only complaint is no rear wiper.

Responses to this review

I’ve had my Civic 2.2 cdti for 1 year - had front drive shafts and whole new clutch, all fixed free under warranty. The clutch had not actually gone, just sqeaked but Honda replaced the lot, pedal and all. All works superbly now, excellent service and I get 64mpg, no problems, out of mine but I do change gear like Nigel Mansell on speed lol which helps lol. I shut my door and say it sounds like a Golf only works better lol Anyway, why would people want to drive a Golf which was invented by mad German golfers who have iron clad a golf cart and some kid nicked the cart badge thus the Golf was born lol. All jokes aside, the Civic is the daddy ;) Steve Shaw from Yorkshire

Submitted: 01/08/2008 09:48:16

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Nearchos Christofides, Scotland

Honda FR-V 1.8 EX 5dr 2007

A magnificent car. The 1.8l engine is a little underpowered but auto-gearbox copes pretty well. Will do a 6.8l/100 km at 105km/h on the highway, but in town consumption suffers. Ample space for kids, baggage and most household transportation. Could even fit a 2.5m garden umbrella box with the rear seats dropped. An excellent space management for Honda. Would have been the perfect car had it been fitted with a 1.8l diesel.

Submitted: 21/07/2008 11:51:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Graham Atherton, Cheshire

Honda Jazz 1.2 base model 2006

Brilliant car, cheap to run. Has returned 48mpg over a combination of 5 - 10 mile daily trips and monthly 500 mile motorway journeys totalling 38.000 miles over 30 months. Nothing has broken, never failed to start and it even cleans up well after a couple of weeks of my 18 month old son daubing various unnamed substances all over the rear seats. It has been suggested that I upgrade to a bigger car next year with more comfort for rear passengers - a Civic perhaps - but with fuel prices the way they are 68mpg from the new model Jazz sounds very attractive.

Submitted: 14/07/2008 11:03:59

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Sajid Choudry, Lancashire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2003

I bought the jazz from the local Honda dealer, I have been very impressed with the Jazz. For me the clincher were the back seats - that is the base of the seats can be raised up, the amount of interior space is more like a class above, my previous car was an Astra 94 model and the boot space was very similar to the Astra but the jazz is a lot smaller outside. People sitting in the jazz for the first time comment on how much room there is. Running costs, road tax £120, insurance group 3 and petrol costs are very low. Making visits to the petrol station less frequent than the previous car. The Jazz has idsi petrol engine with vvt the engine uses 8 spark plugs, this results in 50mpg, the same economy as a 1.0 litre but the performance of a 1.4. The petrol tank has been moved forward instead of the rear which frees up load space. Equipment wise the jazz is very comprehensive, ac electric windows all round electric sunroof, cd player, alloy wheels all of these enhances the drivers enjoyment. The only negative is the ride its bit harsh on poor roads, and tyre noise is loud too but this is due to my car being one of the early model, and i have changed the tyres to Nexen tyres these are a lot better then the Yokoma which were on before. I had a courtesy car from the Honda dealer a jazz 08 and the ride was a lot better, engine performance wise i go for the 1.4 anytime, as its ideal for cruising on the motorway. For servicing costs I pay into a servicing plan monthly, a reasonable £15 per month, to which all the consumable items and labour are covered which to me is a good deal. If i did not pay into the plan I would have been paying up to £450 so its best to enrol into the service plan, another aspect of Jazz ownership is that it holds its resale value very well.

Submitted: 11/07/2008 11:47:56

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mark Pope, Essex

Honda Accord Saloon 2.4 Executive 2003

Without doubt the best car we have had, very responsive petrol engine with good fuel economy, fautless reliability and good interior. Although a tiny bit cramped in the back. We will be looking to get another when the time comes.

Submitted: 08/07/2008 12:51:11

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Chris Smith, Shropshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2003

Marilyn Burford, England Honda Jazz 2007. I have the diesel engine version which is pretty noisy on starting and takes about 5 miles to get going. As I only do about 10 miles a day this is a big draw back. The children like it however and they call it the jazz mobile. I don’t know what car you are driving Marilyn but Honda have never sold a Jazz with a diesel engine - your two star rating for a non-existant model has prevented the Jazz getting an average of 5 stars in this forum - well done.

Submitted: 23/06/2008 11:25:10

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Chris Smith, Shropshire

Honda Jazz 1.4 SE 2003

I’ve had Honda cars before and thought I was downsizing to a Jazz, but it’s a lot bigger inside than people think. Can get two sets of golf clubs with two folding trollies and holiday luggage for two in the boot without folding seats down. Normally get about 55mpg commuting 25 miles each way to work, and about 45mpg around town. Smooth engine with torque coming in low down in rpm range, tractable and easy to drive without having to change gear too often, the gearchange is light and direct. Easy to park with very small turning circle and light steering for parking, but stiffens up as speed rises, fairly quiet ride (depends on tyres fitted) and can hold conversation easily at 70mph.

Submitted: 05/06/2008 08:38:19

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Marilyn Burford, England

Honda Jazz 2007

I have the diesel engine version which is pretty noisy on starting and takes about 5 miles to get going. As I only do about 10 miles a day this is a big draw back. The children like it however and they call it the jazz mobile.

Responses to this review

There isn’t a diesel version of the Jazz to my knowledge - Keith Watton from Staffordshire

Submitted: 03/06/2008 10:18:28

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tom, London

Honda Jazz 2008

Hello. Does anyone out there drive a Honda Jazz or know anyone who does? I work for a company in London who is putting together a short promotional documentary film for Honda, and we’re looking for contributors to chat about their car and their passions/interests, and how the two come together. If anyone does have a Jazz and would be interested in contributing then please give me a shout - my name’s Tom and i can be contacted either on hondafilm2008@yahoo.co.uk or on 0207 194 7056... Thanks for reading this, Tom.

Submitted: 03/06/2008 10:11:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Keith New, Yorkshire

Honda CR-V EX 2008

Was really looking forward to test-driving this vehicle after reading the brochures and what was said about it in reviews. What a great let-down. Tested the EX automatic petrol. Ride was very shuddery on small bumps, more than anything else I have tested - the Tiguan, X-Trail and the Rav4. Build quality is very good. The automatic gearbox was smooth but coupled to the petrol engine made the car utterly pedantic. With 3 passengers on board it struggled to accellerate at all. Honda need to do a big rethink on this engine/gearbox combination, it is not up to the job. The boot annoyed me because there is nowhere to stow the removable upper deck inside the boot, access to the lower deck is impossible with the tonneau cover in place and the upper deck installed. If you want to remove the tonneau cover, it is quite aukward to get out of the car; if you want to stow it away in the car, it’s too long to be put anywhere without getting in the way. The dashboard is easy on the eye and a plus point. In the cabin, rear passengers were not very complimentary about the back seats. The sunroof does not open but consists of two large windows with an electric blind which winds into the central roof bulk head, so retracting the blind opens both front and back blinds equally. This should be independent. Overall, I was not impressed.

Submitted: 20/05/2008 10:04:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mary Innes, Scotland

Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC Petrol SE 2006

Lovely to look at, great dashboard and gadgets are cool! Really nice to drive and responsive, however, required rear suspension replacing 6/12 out of the show room resulting in front tyres replacing at <9000miles and rear brake pads and discs at 14,000, (no warning signs on instrument panel). Petrol cap keeps sticking, requiring return visits to the workshop. I am disappointed at the reliability.

Submitted: 15/05/2008 09:05:19

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mark Horton, Nottinghamshire

Honda Accord Saloon 2.2 diesel 2008

This is not the cheapest car of its type but the refinement and meticulous attention to detail make light of the extra cash. Reliability is a byword of Honda&rsquo;s and the performance is powerful yet quite and almost unnoticeable. Plenty of room inside with a good boot. I particularly like the Lane Keeping assistance that makes motorway driving far more relaxed. If you want performance, reliability, safety and a pleasing driving experience then the Accord offers all this and more.

Submitted: 08/05/2008 11:53:35

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Helen Steadman, London

Honda Civic Civic IMA hybrid 2006

I&rsquo;ve been running the hybrid now for almost 2 years and so far so good. I live in London and this has meant that I have never had to pay a penny towards the London Congestion Charge, the CO2 emissions of the hybrid are only 109g/km. The car is also means low company car tax. I get around 55 - 60 miles to the gallon (my daily journey involves a lot of stopping and starting which is great for recharging the battery but not great for fuel economy...). There are a few flaws - the brakes are too heavy, the engine sometimes sounds strained. This is why I can only give the hybrid 4 stars but any new technology will have its teething problems and I am prepared to accept this. I will continue to go for the greener option when getting a new car and would be happy to first see what new offerings Honda have before looking elsewhere.

Submitted: 06/05/2008 08:58:46

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

James Birch, Torfaen

Honda Civic 1.6 VTEC 2004

This is precisely what a car should be - well constructed and completely reliable. The variant that I chose was the 1.6, perfect as a small family car, frugal and a very comfortable ride with plenty of head and leg room. The amount of storage space is a real highlight with a roomy boot and fold down rear seats when extra space is required. The cabin controls are well ordered and easy to find and use. What makes the Honda Civic such a good car? Reliability and attention to detail. 5 out of 5.

Submitted: 29/04/2008 10:26:31

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Morton, Suffolk

Honda Jazz 1.4cc 2007

Best car I ever owned, beats my previous Volvo 440 hands down. It took 3 adults and myself as driver on a journey through France just after I purchased it; with four cases in boot. We averaged 48.5 MPH over 1,875 miles. Amazing around town; about 46 mph, on longer journeys with two we average 49.2 mph... Its upright seating is extremely comfortable which means I can drive further without have to get out and stretch my poor old legs. If the Jazz has a downside it&rsquo;s a harder ride than my old Volvo. Finally, it will be my car of choice for years to come.

Submitted: 28/04/2008 13:41:14

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Jennifer Kelly, Vale of Glamorgan

Honda Jazz 1.4 i-DSI SE 2007

This is quite simply a wonderful car - it was Japan's 2002 Car of the Year and I can see why. The driving position is excellent; the interior is well constructed with everything where you would expect it. One thing that pleased and surprised me was the generous amount of loading space once the back seats had been lowered, carrying flat-pack furniture was not something that I thought would be possible when I purchased the Jazz but it has proven remarkably adept in this area. I wanted long-term reliability from my new car - reports suggested that this is exactly what the Jazz would give me and that it has done. This is a well constructed, green and stylish car.

Submitted: 28/04/2008 10:44:02

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Marc, Middlesex

Honda Accord Saloon ex 2.0ivtec 2007

Had this car for three months now. Good points Ride is excellent Quiet as a mouse with a refined petrol engine Interior is luxurious Good stereo and lots of toys Bad points A little cramped in the back Some interior finishes not up to standard A little road roar on some surfaces Would have like bluetooth as standard (got it as extra) Overall, this is a great car, but is let down by some below par quality finishing in the interior and reduced room in the back.

Submitted: 24/04/2008 08:31:51

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Sally Crooks, Surrey

Honda Jazz 1.4i SE CVT-7 2004

I&rsquo;ve had this car from new and it has been the best car I&rsquo;ve ever owned. It&rsquo;s been totally reliable and I still enjoy driving it after all this time. I will be looking to change my car soon and will have no hesitation heading straight for my local Honda dealer and getting another Jazz. Brilliant car, loads of space for size of the car and very capable over short and very long (France and back) journeys.

Submitted: 22/04/2008 07:54:50

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Oliver Needle, Northumberland

Honda FR-V 2.0 VTEC Sport 2005

Big, solid car that is very enjoyble to drive and bought used (like mine) very affordable. Very good running costs as well. Nice cabin, everything laid out really well and the interior is very comfortable throughout. The wife loves it, kids love it. Not overly powerful but plenty for our needs so no complaints there. Really pleased I chose this for our family car, fits the bill very nicely indeed.

Submitted: 22/04/2008 07:40:07

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Greg Reardon, Essex

Honda Accord Saloon 2.0i-VTEC SE 2006

Great car to drive, gutsy power when needed and so smooth and quiet. I really enjoy long distance journeys in this car because it is so comfortable and the handling is very responsive - more like gliding than driving. Not the cheapest car to run but certainly not the worst and Honda are a very trustworthy make. Good size boot but it would be nice to have a touch more space in the back seat although I wouldn&rsquo;t go so far as to say it feels cramped for adult passengers, maybe just snug.

Submitted: 21/04/2008 20:53:06

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Philip Jennings, Dorset

Honda S2000 2.0i VTEC GT 2005

This is just the most fun to drive and gives a very smooth and comfortable drive around town, but when on the open road it really comes into its own, which lets face it is the reason you buy a sportscar. This little beauty can shift and then some!! I&rsquo;ve previously owned a Mazda MX-5 but this car has more guts to it and a little more style. If you need to ask about fuel consumption though don&rsquo;t even look at one!

Submitted: 21/04/2008 11:55:10

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Keith Williams, Swansea

Honda Civic Vetec i 1.8 Sport 2006

I have only had my car a few weeks but i love it, its great to drive plenty of leg room, two things i have a issue with is no back wiper, and no spare wheel other wise you can’t fault it.

Submitted: 11/02/2008 14:09:55

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Nick Clark, Newport

Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC Petrol SE i-SHIFT 2006

I&rsquo;ve done over 27,000 miles in my new Civic and I have to say I still love every mile I do. Everyone says it&rsquo;s gorgeous, both inside and out. All the gadgets are great fun and the driving experience is close to that of a journey on futuristic space craft. Aside from the great things, like the super fuel economy (I once managed 51 mpg for a few weeks), and the sci-fi interior, it does have issues. I have the &rsquo;automatic&rsquo; version, which is anything but. The i-SHIFT gear system is absolutely infuriating and even Honda garages acknowledge that it&rsquo;s extremely &rsquo;difficult&rsquo; to drive. I say it&rsquo;s a BAD gear box, not a difficult car to drive. I&rsquo;ve had two previous automatics, both Honda, and they were a dream compared to the new Civic. The car often insists on going into 6th gear at the worst possible moments. And I’ve had numerous near misses running out of drive whilst pulling out from junctions finding the car would not come out of first gear. Over-revving warning lights were never meant to be used so much! Still, the thing is, this car is so good, I really don&rsquo;t care about the gearbox issues. There&rsquo;s a great paddle shift system for manual operation and it gets me out of any tight spot. It comes with all the gadgets as standard, and even two years after buying I think my motor is still the coolest car on the road.

Submitted: 07/01/2008 11:52:54

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Steve Williams, Lancashire

Honda S2000 Open 2.0 GT 2dr 2007

This is an amazing little car when you consider what you&rsquo;re getting for the money and it really can go. Fabulous fun to drive and not as bad on fuel as I expected (mid 20&rsquo;s) but make sure you keep your eye on the oil. An understated little belter of a car, that is as reliable as it is fast!

Submitted: 26/11/2007 08:40:26

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Michael Bruce, Durham

Honda Legend 3.5 V6 EX 4dr 2007

I&rsquo;ve recently looked at buying one of these and whilst I still think it&rsquo;s a great looking car and I&rsquo;m still a fan of Honda, there are a lot more cars out there that are cheaper to run and have a little more oomf to them for the same price. Not for me.

Submitted: 20/11/2007 17:09:27

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Bagg, Somerset

Honda Accord Tourer 2.2i-CTDi EX 5dr 2005

Having owned several Honda cars over the years and always being very happy with them, when the time came to move to an estate car I had no hesitation in choosing Honda again. The Accord Tourer is very well built and has managed to offer the premium amount of space possible in a car of its size. The engine runs super smooth and for a diesel is extremely quiet. All good stuff, however, the hulking dashboard and thick pillars mean that visibility is impared at times, even with a fully adjustable drivers seat you do feel that you have to strain your neck at times to see what&rsquo;s going on. For this reason the wife just plain refuses to drive it. I have got used to driving like this but because of the poor visibility and not too cheap running costs, I think I will be straying out of my Honda comfort zone when the time comes to choose a new estate car.

Submitted: 17/11/2007 15:30:29

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Rohit Gand, Leicestershire

Honda Civic 2000

Very difficult to get original parts and very expensive Also most parts have to be original Honda parts. Honda dealers are big headed in Leicester.

Submitted: 14/11/2007 09:27:27

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Guy Young, Scotland

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC ES 2007

Best SUV on the market. I&rsquo;d have to say that the CR-V really belongs on-road. Everything about the CR-V is well laid out and I really like this as I&rsquo;d class myself as a neat and orderly and it makes me feel really comfortable and at ease when driving. Honda have made a really safe and handsome car that is reasonably priced.

Submitted: 09/11/2007 09:59:23

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Craig Lee, County Down

Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC Sport 2007

The Honda Civic is a beautifully built car. This is the most attractive hatchback on the market. The Civic could easily be used in Sci-Fi films, such is its space-age appearance. I chose the 1.8 for the better performance that it offers. The 1.4 is rather weak. Honda have build the interior well with lots of space for legs and shoulders. The build quality is were the Civic really stands head and shoulders above its rivals - everything is beautiful and this helps give the car an extremely refined look. The Civic is great value for money and economical to run.

Submitted: 05/11/2007 12:46:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Daniel Chan, Cheshire

Honda Jazz 1.4i-DSI SE 2007

Excellent car, out-classes all of it&rsquo;s rivals. A brillant supermini, featuring fold flat rear seats for clever storage solution. Great on the motorway, quiet and acceleration is fantastic. Residuals are great too.

Submitted: 31/10/2007 17:17:26

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Trevor Partridge, Norfolk

Honda Stream 2.0 SE Sport 5dr

I like the fact that there aren&rsquo;t many of these about so you won&rsquo;t see one every 5 mins like other MPVs. A six seater, it has ample leg and head room and is very comfortable to travel in as well as drive. The rear seats fold down to give a really good boot size when not in use, but the boot is a bit stingy when the seats are up. Other than that I have no complaints.

Submitted: 30/10/2007 10:40:34

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Hugo Wilson, Lancashire

Honda FR-V 2.0 SE 5dr

This is an excellent MPV from Honda, it is practical, comfortable and feels almost nippy to drive. We like the 3 x 3 seating and the kids often fight over who get to sit up front. The only thing I&rsquo;d mark it down for is fuel consumption, which isn&rsquo;t bad at all but there is definately room for improvement. Good all round car.

Submitted: 27/10/2007 23:37:31

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

William Norris, Norfolk

Honda HR-V HR-V VTEC 5dr

Whilst aimed at the 4x4 market, I was aware before I bought my second hand 2004 HR-V that it&rsquo;s strongest points don&rsquo;t lie off road, however, as a family car with plenty of space for 3 children and a very comfortable drive it really does rate up there.

Submitted: 26/10/2007 18:33:47

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

John Carlton, Durham

Honda Accord Saloon 2.2 i CTDi Sport

More expensive than a lot of other mainstream family cars, but an excellent drive with lots of space. Nice car.

Submitted: 26/10/2007 12:05:24

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Joanne McKillip, Herefordshire

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-CTDi ES

This is the most comfortable 4x4 in the UK! Visibility is great and there is ample space for both my family and any luggage we need to carry. I feel extremely safe in the CR-V and the reliability has so far not been called into question. I firmly believe that the CR-V is the best in its class and perfect for families of all sizes.

Submitted: 24/10/2007 15:40:10

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Brian Harrison, Norfolk

Honda Jazz 1.4 Sport

After one year of ownership, this really is a great little car. After changing from a Passat Estate I had expected to have to make a lot of compromises, it may be smaller but the adaptability and quality more than make up for that. Don&rsquo;t waste time, buy one now!

Submitted: 23/10/2007 08:56:52

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Boyd Mason, Hampshire

Honda NSX 3.2i V6 manual

I love this car, it has everything you could ever want, looks, performance and more fun than you can shake a stick at. The interior is more than comfortable and and once you&rsquo;re behind the wheel it&rsquo;s a wrench to get back out. This is a car I&rsquo;ve lusted after for a long time and it does not disappoint.

Submitted: 20/10/2007 10:09:22

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tariq Iqbal, Durham

Honda Civic Type R GT 2.0 ltr

Great looking, fantastic engine, great economy ( 55+ miles to the gallon ). Great car!!!! Highly recommended.

Submitted: 16/10/2007 10:34:58

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Craig Wallasey, Durham

Honda Logo 1.3i

Don&rsquo;t buy cars out of the local rag. Don&rsquo;t fall for the fact there aren&rsquo;t many around - there&rsquo;s a reason! DON&rsquo;T buy this car, it&rsquo;s a complete bucket!!

Submitted: 02/10/2007 11:41:57

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Geraint Evans, Ceredigion

Honda Shuttle 2.3 SE

I&rsquo;ve had this car for 7 years now and am now looking to replace it. I have to say it has done brilliantly and has given me reliability and fuss free driving, however, I feel MPV&rsquo;s have come on a bit since the Shuttle and after test driving a few (Vauxhall, Nissan) you realise how low the driving position is and that the mpg is a lot lower than others now available on the market. All in all though it&rsquo;s been a very good family car and I certainly don&rsquo;t regret buying it.

Submitted: 29/09/2007 16:12:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

William Duncan, Fife and Kinross Shires

Honda CR-V CDTi EX

Very pleased with this car. Used as towcar for caravan. Powerful and stable with good fuel consumption. Reversing camera brilliant for hitching up caravan. Voice control satnav/radio is a bit gimicky, most functions will never be used. Seating comfortable and nicely elevated. Bags of room especially in the boot, although shelf can&rsquo;t be folded in half when tonneau cover fitted.

Submitted: 27/09/2007 09:13:17

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Mike Coles, Gloucestershire

Honda CR-V

This is our second CRV and we are very pleased with it so far, only had it for 4 days. Like the speech commands system and the handsfree for the phone. Love the shape as well, and hope it proves more economical than our previous petrol model.

Responses to this review

Now that you have had your CRV for quite a while are you still as enthusiastic as you were after 4 days? I am thinking of buying a petrol automatic and want to know what the fuel consumption is like and whether or not it powerful enough an engine for an auto gearbox? Thanks - Nick Gras from Sussex

Submitted: 05/09/2007 11:00:04

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Tom Elliott, Lancashire

Honda CR-V 2.0 VTEC SE

This is my second CRV, and again Honda have done an excellent job, smooth ride, quite economical and plenty of space. Only downside I can see so far is that the interior is still a bit plasticy!!

Submitted: 23/08/2007 10:25:41

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Asim Akhtar, Warwickshire

Honda Civic Sport

Performance, handling, economy, style, reliabilty - all 5 out of 5 from me. I am delighted with my choice and will be looking at the new Civic hybrid when the time comes to trade in my existing model.

Submitted: 17/08/2007 09:01:55

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Ken Whittle, Cumbria

Honda CR-V Honda CR-V 22i-CTDi

Very comfortable car and extremely enjoyable to drive, the engine is very quiet for a diesel, just like they say, and fuel consumption so far is good for an engine of this size. Not had it for long so we’ll see how it goes but confident it will continue to please.

Submitted: 10/08/2007 09:44:58

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

Marnie Russell, Ceredigionshire

Honda Jazz Honda Jazz 1.2i DSI

This is a brilliantly versatile little car. I love the way I can fold both the back and the passenger seat flat for storage space, it’s inexpensive to run and to insure and I think looks really smart. I really like the wide windscreen too, makes me realise how poor visibility was in my previous car (Matiz). Really nippy around town although I must admit I’ve not been on a long journey in it yet so will see how she does when I go to Cornwall next month.

Submitted: 09/08/2007 11:51:13

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

David Reid, Durham

Honda Civic Honda Civic S 1.8i VTEC

Very reliable family car, easy and enjoyable to drive and offers all the space you need, my only grumble is no rear window wiper, but all in all I’m very pleased with it.

Submitted: 07/08/2007 14:17:51

Respond to this review | Write a report on this vehicle

^ Back to Top