3.0 V6 CRD - The 300C has proved a big success for Chrysler since first going on sale in 2005. Its striking good looks and attractive pricing made it a tempting proposition for execs wanting an imposing luxury car... read more
2.8 CRD Limited - The Grand Voyager brings nothing new the MPV table but it is impossible to grumble about the amount of space that it offers. The sliding doors and vanishing seats are excellent but the Grand Voyager i... read more
3.0 CRD diesel - An effortless drive featuring excellent ride and handling. A large car inside and out, the 300C has a secure feel. Offers great value for money.... read more
Have your say!
Chrysler lease prices ![]()
Chrysler new cars and nearly new cars ![]()
The Chrysler badge is said to resemble a Viking helmet and emphasise a spirit of daring and of exploration. Some believe that they also pay homage to Mercury, the winged Greek deity and universal symbol of speed.The ribbon seal and silver wings first appeared on the radiator shell of the 1924 Chrysler Model B.
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 18 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 8 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 8 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 5 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 4 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 3 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 2 reviews )
![]()
Average driver rating ( based on 2 reviews )
The latest Chrysler driver reviews and road test reports. The views expressed do not reflect the thoughts and opinions of ReallyGoodDomains.com
Submit a Chrysler road test report
![]()
I bought my PT Cruiser second hand in January 2007 and I love it! I’ve had no problems whatsoever and in winter it starts first time in temperatures of zero and below. Its so roomy - great for moving house. You get used to the wide turning circle and the fuel consumption is about 30-33mph, {just don’t go into fifth gear and slow down if you worry about petrol consumption}. I love the roominess inside and the space in the boot, if I take the back seats out, then I have a van. I hope this car lasts forever!
Submitted: 29/06/2009 15:55:27
![]()
Purchased a brand new limited Grand Voyager in May 2009 for my wife. I wasn’t sure about the purchase (wife had driven a hired one in USA and was already in love with it) but as we put on mile after trouble-free mile (we’re fast approaching 5000 miles) I’m more and more convinced that it was a sound buy. I noted that your reviewer claims average MPG of 30... but I’ve just returned from a trip to Scotland with a real mix of fast motorways and crowded urban driving and have achieved 35.5 MPG... for such a large vehicle I think it is outstanding. The space and comfort are just first class and the ’electronic stow and go’ and ’boot opener/closer’ are very impressive. I would have given 5 stars but for 3 minor gripes... when fully loaded with 6 or 7 people and luggage she definitely feels it when going up any large hill. The reversing camera is rubbish (hope to have it replaced/refocused at first service). The Satnav is too quiet and sometimes turns itself off for no reason (again hopefully will be sorted at first service). All in all I’m growing to love the car as much as my wife.
Submitted: 26/06/2009 10:13:26
![]()
Mine is in Black / Black Windows / Bentley Grill / Debadged and I have removed the orange side lights and replaced with clear/smoked ones from the US. This make the car look great and it really does turn heads, especially when it has just been waxed. In fact, it gets more looks than my BMW 7 with 20" rims that I had last. The car does appx 27mpg and drives well. I have done 11k so far and despite having its second set of alloys fitted under warranty (they all pitted and the lacquer came off) I have had no problems. It is due it’s first service next month and to my surprise it takes 10 litres of low ash oil at £11+VAT per litre, total price £352, with a bit of shopping around this came down to £255. I also tow a caravan, and despite getting strange looks when it goes past people it does the job really well, the only towbar option though is a Brink Detachable at £500. This is the best value for money car in it’s class, but remember, you are buying a VFM Chrysler, it might look great and drive well but is is still no match for a Audi A6/Merc E or BMW 5, but then it is half the price!
Submitted: 24/06/2009 17:33:48
![]()
I have the 2.0 diesel and I get 45mpg. I find the road holding good and ride very comfortable and luxurious. Handling is also very good, steering also. It is light enough when manoeuvring, positive at speed with no steering shuddering that you get with some European cabriolets on bumpy roads. There is plenty of pulling power, a good cruiser on motorway and you also get a lot of car for the money plus lots of extras as standard. It has a 3yr warranty. I previously owned a VW Eos which had a water leak, steering shudder on bumpy roads and a rattling back window. I have read a lot of magazine and internet reviews on the Sebring and they don’t seem to think its even comparable to European cars. It is now also available with big discounts which I think makes it more than favourable than the competition.
Submitted: 29/05/2009 10:15:40
![]()
I wanted one of these the first time I saw one, I have always gone for the quirky type of cars for the last 45 years. I can’t fault the looks and the equipment you get, but I’m afraid it all does pear shaped from there. The poor turning circle has got me in one or two scrapes - the head gasket leaked from new, the engine is like a 2.4 from the early Volvo’s and sadly out of date. I have regretted leasing it because of the 20 mpg ( on a good day ) and would definitely never get another.
Submitted: 13/05/2009 11:11:56
![]()
I own a 07 E-Class. I bought the Sebring for my wife, the 2lt diesel. So far the car is fabulous, drives great, has lots of extras and looks great!
Submitted: 28/04/2009 10:49:41
![]()
Always wanted this car as I think all modern cars have boring styling. Needless to say I like classic cars! I bought my car in 2003 and have had no problems with it breaking down etc but as it is 8 years old it was time for a new cam belt and while this was being done the water pump and power steering pipe were found to have seepage marks so I replaced these as well. I had noticed this year that when indicating right sometimes the fog lights would activate for the duration the indicator was on and knew that was a faulty multifunction indicator switch which costs about £70 plus labour so got this done as well. Was surprised at some of the comments about the car being slow, the name PT Cruiser points to its intended use, so yup, its no fireball but I have no problems as I am in no great hurry.... I get 40 mpg on an all motorway cruise down to my mums and reasonable (for the design age of the engine) fuel return about town where I am in no hurry to catch up with the next traffic jam. That said, the 2.4 litre or diesel are a lot better for midrange but were out of my pocket’s reach in 2003. The Auto box should be avoided as that is a very old design and thus inefficient on fuel. Never had a problem with the turning circle as I am that cheeky sod who uses your drive way to about turn!! Here is to many happy cruising years to come.
Submitted: 14/04/2009 11:54:57
![]()
This car turns heads like no other, it’s a superb car to look at and drive. Clarkson hated it but then again it doesn’t cost £200,000 and needs a race track to drive it. Anyone thinking of getting one... do it. You won’t regret it.
Submitted: 14/04/2009 11:22:06
![]()
Great car! Love the wind in my hair. Fuel is good on the open road city running around does chew the juice. The seating is high so much more comfortable than having your bum dragging on the ground in an MG. Can’t help but smile and feel good behind the wheel of this car!
Submitted: 23/03/2009 10:26:32
![]()
BEAUTIFUL, FANTASTIC, HUGE. It catches more eyes than any European equivalent. I’ve leased one for nearly two years and I’m going to have another one stone white colour this time with the windows blacked out again. The car is utterly reliable as I have done 60,000 miles in under two years apart from servicing, this car is highly recommended to those who want something different; its appearance is concept with its flattened roof look an awesome design. The V8 hemi SRT would be my preferred choice of engine but the petrol prices in the UK would make it a rich man’s toy. However, the V6 3.0 diesel is impressive in every way, shape and form. I carry lots of TV camera equipment and I still get an impressive 42mpg at 70mph. LOVE IT!
Submitted: 19/03/2009 09:37:23
![]()
We love the car but hate the turning. Would we buy another one? Yes, if we could. They don’t make them any more - bring back the PT Limited!
Submitted: 09/03/2009 09:33:38
![]()
Mine has been without a doubt the worst car I have ever owned. After 1 month the slave cylinder in the clutch failed - not a major problem you might say but it was because it is fitted inside the gearbox!! Two weeks later the fuel pump failed costing over £900 to replace. After getting the car back the new fuel pump leaked and within two hours the car was back in the garage again. Got it back two weeks later... another fuel leak developed had to be recovered by RAC. Agree with other comments it has the turning circle of a battleship - maybe not such an issue in America but on our roads renders the car awkward to drive. It’s a shame because despite the above I love the look of the car, the comfort etc, but for an everyday vehicle it is just not a viable option unless you have a spare car and very deep pockets.
Submitted: 16/01/2009 14:32:29
![]()
Arguably its the best People Carrier you can buy (and I have been using People Carriers (not to be confused with MPV’s ) for some ten years. I have a family of seven and its the only car to buy .....as a starting point it will take seven suit cases without the need for a top box (and its the first car I have had without a top box and hence one that can fit under most height barriers and into multi storey car parks!). Later models might seem better but unfortunately not available with this 5 speed manual gear box - fancy 34mpg cruising at 80mph - seven up? , then read on. This is a car, which although it develops the occasional electrical gadget fault, starts every time. Its interior comfort is the best welcome I have ever had. Its towing power is good - I’d have liked a little more, but its due to the high gearing and 3rd and 4th are the gears to use. However MPG when towing is reasonable. On the plus side, for the practically minded its seems to come apart quite easily (even though a Haynes manual didn’t say how to get access to grease the handbrake mechanism. The starter motor was removed and refitted in the half the time it took to do the same job on a 1993 Mondeo - and it was not changed, just the solenoid cleaned at zero cost. This is a car I would like to keep for ever. Its an ICON, a bit like a VW and I really wish I could buy a new one , perhaps with a 3 litre engine, although in truth the 2.5 is still a very good one. With a little TLC I’d like to think it would last forever. It remains a car to arrive in.
Submitted: 12/01/2009 09:04:22
![]()
Love it - for sheer presence, space, versatility and believe it or not, economy and performance, nothing touches it in this price bracket. Takes a day to get used to the size thing, but it is nimble, quick, tight turning circle and car park friendly despite appearances. Love it.
Submitted: 19/11/2008 15:07:31
![]()
I went to Texas for 6 weeks and hired a PT Cruiser, I was hoping for a Focus or similar, I hated the Cruisers styling, but after driving it I was impressed by the comfort and equipment, loads of room and nice to drive, nothing went wrong and the economy was good, performance ok, smooth auto, doors and boot that close well without slamming, I have since sold my Toyota Corolla, uncomfortable, bad handling, poor auto, silly niggling faults, the PT cruiser is much nicer, but I bought a 3 series BMW, everything about it is better than Toyota, looks beat the Cruiser.
Submitted: 20/10/2008 10:22:14
![]()
Purchased my "Silver Pearlescent with colour coded bumpers!" five weeks ago. So far, for the price I paid, I have no real issues; although I do agree the turning circle is pretty poor. However, comfort, space and style make up for its short- comings. Mine is a 2002 2.0 manual, any hints on deceleration when changing gear?
Submitted: 10/10/2008 09:51:55
![]()
Rented a diesel manual for a long weekend, which included two separate motorway journeys totalling 600 miles and two local journeys of 20 miles each way with three adults in the car, and two 90 year olds - for the local journeys. This car was effortless on the motorway. It lacks punch for sudden overtaking opportunities but was seamless when overtaking manoeuveres were planned. Once in the groove at a high cruising speed it was quiet and relaxing. Cruise control was a bonus. One passenger remarked on the fact that when approaching other vehicles on the motorway they often simply moved out of the way - I believe this was purely down to frontal styling and sheer ’presence’. rather than any intimidation on my part. My passengers were impressed with the comfort and ride quality. I would say that on this model an autobox would have suited the cars driving style, which promotes a leisurely type of driving. The interior is very roomy and seems to have been styled for the stereotypically larger framed person in mind. When pushed around ’A’ roads it is predictable with a good feel to the brakes and I have driven cars with worse steering feedback. But this is not what this car is about. Fuel consumption was excellent. The only niggles are with the clutch-pedal-down starting procedure and the smallish boot space - but I am normally a hatchback fan and am used to piling it high.... Jaguar coined the phrase ’Grace, Pace and Sace’ - and it almost sums it up.
Submitted: 15/09/2008 16:00:35
![]()
This I have to be honest is the best car I have ever owned, with ample space and great MPG (with the credit crunch I need it). I managed to purchase an ex demonstrator with only a 100 miles on for £16000 including the satellite navigation system from Ryfield Birmingham where they also had the petrol one for £12000. So have got a great car that gives a smooth ride and looks different and more classy than its competitors. Well done Chrysler.
Submitted: 03/09/2008 13:13:39
![]()
I’ve had my car for 4 months now. It’s great value for money if you can pick up an ex demo. Nice and roomy and plenty of gadgets to get to grips with. Try and get a model with the MyGig sat nav fitted, a much better option than the basic CD player.
Submitted: 22/08/2008 10:31:23
![]()
It feels like a million dollars, and costs roughly that much to get it from our house to Tesco and back. I was persuaded to buy my black "batmobile" by my 9 year old son who couldn’t settle to bed all night after we’d been for a test drive in it a couple of weeks ago, so thrilling he found it..... OK, I didn’t do much research, and the ZZ Top thing grabbed me, as did the relative obscurity and undeniable surfeit of creature comforts offered within... will I still have it in 6 months time? Not sure, but I’ll certainly still be talking about it, and it makes a change to see a car that actually looks like a proper car, not just another conservative "family" jelly mould with broadly predictable kit, mpg etc... 25 miles to the gallon? That’s why god gave us credit cards. Enjoy!!!!!!!!!!
Submitted: 13/08/2008 10:55:28
![]()
I need help on finding a reason as to why the reversing lights flash the radio and the wipers do the same all at the same time.
Submitted: 01/08/2008 09:42:48
![]()
Quite simply its the best blend of value for money, prestige & executive saloon, power & performance in the UK car market! With head turning presence, performance that surprises when ever its required & a sumptuous drive & luxury driver position. I have driven almost as many cars as the famous curly top MR J Clarkson & covered in excess of 1,500 miles a week for the past 3 years, this car not only saved my life it almost felt part of the family. Not only does it have a much stronger residual value than any Jaguar S Type, Mercedes E Class, BMW 5 series or even the new face lifted Audi A6, just look at the monthly contract hire or PCP figures. I use E.S.Hartley, Ings, Kendal, Cumbria. They are the most relaxed, knowledgeable, thorough vehicle leasing company in the market, well worth a call.
Submitted: 28/07/2008 09:58:11
![]()
I wanted one of these car for quite some time, I eventually got one second hand and apart from the very poor turning circle I thought the car was excellent, plenty of power and quite good on fuel for the size of the engine. But then it all turned very bad, one day I was driving along and the engine just cut out, fortunately I was only doing 25mph on a side road - god knows what would have happened if I had been overtaking on the motor way. I got the car taken to a Chrysler Dealer who found the ASD fuse had blown and when it was replace it just started no problems, the big problem is no one, not even Chrysler UK can tell me why the fuse blow and they could give no guarantee that it would not happen again. As you may has guessed I am getting rid of it since it is a potential death trap.
Submitted: 25/07/2008 11:36:38
![]()
Overall not a bad car except for the bad turning ratio, being hard on fuel and faulty gauges. The speedometer was off by 5 kilometres.
Submitted: 11/07/2008 11:50:33
![]()
At list price it’s below par, but look at the actual price you pay! Where else can you get a diesel engined car, as big as a BMW 5 Series, with leather, that will averasge 50+mpg if you’re careful, for less than 13,500 with metalic black paint and supaguard! The only annoyance is that the standard stereo is only a single cd.... Some of the plastics are a little cheap, but solid and well put together.... I couldn’t find a better new car for the price.
Submitted: 08/07/2008 15:58:01
![]()
One of the best looking cabrios around, nice to drive, looks just as good with hood up bit heavy on fuel but you can’t have everything. Good value, even better if you buy used.
Submitted: 30/06/2008 09:06:06
![]()
I just bought a Chrysler Sebring - 1 month old for £11,150 on the road. Good family car with lots of extras. Where else can you get a car with such high spec for that?
Submitted: 23/06/2008 08:58:38
![]()
The 300c is not a Mercedes but it is £30,000 pounds cheaper. I have driven Mercedes since 1988 and have enjoyed the spec at a price. The 300c gives you a very good standard of spec at 1/2 the cost of the price of the Germans. It is reliable, comfortable and spacious... so don’t delay and buy one today. The only thing I can’t answer is what 2nd hand value it will demand on the market...
Submitted: 19/06/2008 09:44:52
![]()
I love this motor a blast, from the past with all mod cons. Depreciation is bad, I mean really bad. So why play the game? I am keeping it and going to lpg (liquid petroleum gas). I reckon this is a 200,000 mile car. I love it to death!
Submitted: 16/06/2008 09:43:38
![]()
Why make an ordinary saloon into a less than average convertible? Looks dated and is expensive - I went for the Vauxhall Astra Twin Top instead.
Submitted: 13/05/2008 13:02:05
![]()
Wow, just bought my crossfire... love it!!! I have been a Jaguar man for the past 4 cars, Jaguar has lost me now. 10/10 for the fun.
Submitted: 30/04/2008 11:31:33
![]()
It’s a big and bold car so I know it won’t appeal to everyone but having never been a shrinking violet I think it’s wonderful. Amazing value for how much car you get and it certainly turns heads. Masses of space for both driver and passengers make it feel luxurious and very comfortable. Not as bad on fuel as you’d expect and nice to cruise around in.
Submitted: 24/04/2008 15:30:22
![]()
Why?? I recently test drove this car, out of sheer curiosity really. It’s not that it’s a bad car to drive, I’ve definately driven worse, but there’s no getting away from the fact you look like you’re driving an oversized rollerskate! A head turner but for all the wrong reasons.
Submitted: 22/04/2008 07:06:43
![]()
Great car. Bit like marmite, you either love it or hate it. Plenty of room in the back (for three adults) as well as the front. Owned ours for 3 years without much problem. Spares prices variable. Turning circle awful. Fuel consumption awful. Looks priceless!
Submitted: 14/04/2008 10:44:37
![]()
I chose this car from a list of run of the mill company cars because I wanted something a little different. It certainly looks the part and has some very nice details but on the whole I’ve found it a little underwhelming. Maybe I’m being a little unkind as it’s the first Chrysler I’ve ever driven but for all it’s razzamatazz it just doesn’t deliver anything really that special. An okay car but will probably go back to the Passat or similar when I have the chance.
Submitted: 14/04/2008 08:59:36
![]()
Can’t fault the looks of the machine! Drives solid and admired around! Have a red private reg! ie i found my old Alfa Romeo more expensive! top notch!!
Submitted: 26/03/2008 09:01:22
![]()
I bought this car 3 years ago. 25K on the clock for an 02 plate. What excellent value for money this car is. It has been totally reliable, runs well with a sporty look and feel. Insurance is good; cannot fault the car.
Submitted: 11/03/2008 09:50:57
![]()
To follow up on my last comments; I was in the dealership today to look at their just-arrived 2008 UK-model CRD 2.2 Limited PT Cruiser. I spent at least half an hour going over the vehicle and jotting down the detailed features, so here goes; 17 inch alloys Fuel filler cover is no longer chrome Bodyside mouldings are still chrome Chrome strips on the front grille Chromed exhaust tip Changed rear lettering; "PT Cruiser" on lower left, "Chrysler" above the wings centre; "CRD Limited" on lower right (think the lettering is smaller, still the same characteristic font of course) Door sill plates are black plastic, but with large rectangular brushed metal insert with large bright Chrysler wings logo The seats are now virtually full leather (just a small strip of cloth at the sides of the base) Steering wheel has silver spokes The centre console has a ’hatched’ pattern (dealer called it ’carbon look-alike’) Best I can tell, all the mechanicals are exactly as before.
Submitted: 03/03/2008 11:28:23
![]()
Great for family use, lots of kids, room for pushchair and dogs in the boot and space to bring scooters etc. - all the accessories of a busy family. Most attractive of all the 7 seaters!
Submitted: 25/02/2008 16:34:13
![]()
Bit bothered about Pete Swann’s comments; my dealer simply can’t tell me what will be missing (versus the brochure) from my vehicle when it arrives in two or three weeks. Pretty poor - I’ve seen a few comments on forums that suggest that *no* Chrysler dealers have got up-to-date marketing material and vehicle specs for the 2008 model year PT, Chrysler are concentrating on pushing their ’premium’ vehicles. But I’m going to assume that apart from a few cosmetic things, the car will be substantially as the brochure and Chrysler’s US website describes (otherwise the dealer will find himself with a ’situation’ on his hands). I still think I’m going to enjoy the car immensely, given the style and overall equipment level. As long as I get reliability and good service and warranty work from the dealer, I’ll have made a good decision.
Submitted: 25/02/2008 11:12:33
![]()
Slow, sluggish. That’s just to start. The gearbox is mounted slightly of centre so 1st gear would be where reverse is and second is where first would be. It is noisy and it sounds like you have to over rev to pull away. It has a large turning circle. It is also not good on fuel, around 25-30 mpg. The acceleration is about 0-60 in 1hour. My great Nan could push a full shopping trolley up hill in flippers faster. This is a well over priced car.
Submitted: 25/02/2008 09:57:23
![]()
I have mixed feelings about this car. From a practical perspective, it’s really good. The seats fold down very easily, providing masses of luggage space, all-round visibility is fine, and the electronic sliding doors are a real asset with children. Not so impressive, though, is the engine, which lacks refinement. It’s a noisy engine, and a noisy car to drive on the motorway. This is disappointing, and detracts quite a bit from what would otherwise be a really good family MPV. It’s all very well sitting in roomy comfort, but if you have to shout at each other all of the time to be heard, journeys are not as relaxing as they could be.
Submitted: 18/02/2008 10:18:54
![]()
I love the handling and engine. This car is superb and highly under rated. Its fun and as it is based on SLK Mercedes parts, reliability no problem. I love it!
Submitted: 18/01/2008 17:16:09
![]()
Have purchased the 2008 pt cruiser "Limited" Auto. Disappointed in the lack of promised refinements for this model. No chrome filler cap. No chrome wheels. Running boards are now rubber inserts. Just a new centre stack facia which is quite impressive. Why pay for this model when all the outside refinements are gone?
Submitted: 16/01/2008 12:13:31
![]()
I live In Montreal at the moment and needed a car during my stay so I bought a 300 Chrysler, great looks, spacious, great handing and brakes for an American car, and is good in the heavy snow and ice we get here, fuel economy is about 25-27 to the gallon, best of all due to local promotions and special offers, I paid $22,000 Canadian (about 8K!!!!!!!) Last I saw in the UK they were asking 27k1 Lovely family car, and midnight metallic blue looks really sinister at night. Ross
Submitted: 14/12/2007 16:34:32
![]()
A lot of car for the money although high company car tax. only had it three months and cost £1100 for a replacement headlight unit through insurance. All in all no regrets and it certainly turns heads.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:20:13
![]()
Very practical car with cruise control , leather , air con .I’ drive automatics and the original 2ltd pt cruiser was underpowered .The 2.4 ltr suits it exactly and makes for a relaxed drive . the only drawback is the appalling turning circle . I’ve also gone and leased the convertible (dont fancy the depreciation) and thats very comfortable and refined for drop top.
Submitted: 23/11/2007 09:06:12
![]()
If this car was a teacher it would be your geography teacher, wearing leather elbow patches and brown cords, if it was a sweet it would be a werthers original in a special edition tin, if it was a guitar it would be a 1965 gibson les paul, signed by angus, if it was a female model it would be jennifer anniston in a short skimpy dress, if it was a boxer it would be mike tyson pounding his opponent, if it was a fish it would be a north atlantic 60lb cod, if it was a beer it would be sneck lifter from the lakesdistrict, if it was a sunday lunch it would be roast beef and all the trimmings and two yorkshire puds and apple pie and cream to finish, if it was a radio DJ it would be Alan Partridge aha...back of the net!
Submitted: 22/11/2007 09:26:51
![]()
Amazing value for money - Xenon headlights, cruise, memory seats and mirrors, leather interior, heated front seats, electronic compass + outside temp. It looks great, is quiet, powerful (Merc engine) and econonmical (nearly 35 mpg). It drives beautifully and you can recognise it’s Mercedes heritage without the price tag... A lot of car for the money.
Submitted: 14/11/2007 10:39:21
![]()
MY WIFE HAS OWNED 3 SERIES BMW MAZDA MX5 *(THREE DIFFERENT COLOURS) HER LAST CAR TOYOTA MR2 ALL FUN CARS AND THE TOYOTA NO BOOT SPACE NONE OF THE A MANS CAR. SO WE DECIDEDTO TRADE THWE MR2 FOR A C.C.F. ROADSTER IN THE BEST COLOUR SILVER BLUE METALIC NOW WE HAVE A CAR WE CAN BOTH LOOK GOOD IN AND BOY DOES IT SHIFT THE DESIGN YOU EITHER LIKE IMMEDIATELY OR NOT FOR ME HAVING OWNED LOTUS TURBO ESPRIT, CORVETTE STINGRAY,PLUS NUMEROUS BMW THIS CAR HAS THE LOT POWER, LOOKS, STREET CRED, AND REALIBILITY DUE TO THE MERCEDES CONECTION. IF YOU HAVE THE CASH GO FOR AN AUTOMATIC ROADSTER THE MANUAL GEAR SHIFT IS NOT SO GOOD IN TRAFFIC.
Submitted: 14/11/2007 09:32:35
![]()
Solid, dependable car that offered me bags of space. The seats stow away in the floor, perfect for putting the dogs in the back.
Submitted: 12/11/2007 15:03:41
![]()
This is a such a well thought out car, really clever flexible seating system, bags of space and very well equipped. It has great safety features, which as it’s usually piled hih with kids is obviously a priority. Running costs aren’t cheap but this should keep a good resale value so it’s still a great investment. Extremely easy to drive and very quite but maybe not quite as refined as others.
Submitted: 30/10/2007 10:52:03
![]()
I’m a BIG fan of the PT Cruiser and therefore couldn’t resist the convertable version. It’s a great looking car and and retains all the positive points of the hardtop but can be a bit rough going if there is any wind about and you’re a passenger in the back with the roof is down. Good car but even I must admit it has somehow lost some of the personality of the original.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 20:17:47
![]()
I think this car just looks amazing and I love seeing the reaction I get when people see it’s being driven by woman. This car is classy and luxurious and feels wonderful to drive. A refined ride for someone looking for something a little bit different.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 18:51:30
![]()
When my partner Trixie suggested we get this car, I thought "American muscle car". How wrong can one man be, driving around Sloane Square with my chums I still get the admiring looks, and still keep my credibility when driving into work in the City. All in all, a super car, and quite reasonably priced.
Submitted: 26/10/2007 15:18:01
![]()
Bought this car 2 years ago on an 03 plate with only 10k on the clock and in mint condition. Its a great family car with a massive boot and has been extremely reliable. The only down side I would say is whilst it seats my 3 kids comfortably in the back it would be a squeeze for 3 adults/teenagers. Very good car.
Submitted: 15/10/2007 11:23:47
![]()
Had to have this car when I saw it, it’s such an imposing car but drives beautifully. The big downside to this car is the depreciation, which is frightening but if you’re in the market for a car you can really enjoy and offers real luxury then I would still recommend this to you.
Submitted: 26/09/2007 10:30:49
![]()
I’ve just test driven this car and whilst it looks as good as it does in the advert I’m afraid I remain unconvinced. Very comfortable and all the space you want in a family car but I have to say felt a bit clunky to drive. Nice but I didn’t think it was value for money.
Submitted: 20/09/2007 10:35:40
![]()
I know that this car is not to everybodies taste but I love it! At first I felt a little self-concious driving it to be honest. Now however I just love the feeling of security and comfort I get from the plush cabin and sturdy exterior. I rejected out of hand the Bentley grill however as it just looks cheap and tacky!
Submitted: 18/09/2007 15:00:07
![]()
Great car, loads of space, economical and in my opinion, looks the business. I would recommend this car to anyone.
Submitted: 24/08/2007 17:02:20
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster lease prices
Chrysler Grand Voyager lease prices
Chrysler Sebring lease prices
Chrysler VOYAGER lease prices
Chrysler PT Cruiser Cabrio lease prices
Chrysler Sebring Cabrio lease prices
Chrysler 300C lease prices
Chrysler Crossfire Coupe lease prices
Chrysler Pt Cruiser lease prices
Chrysler 300C Touring lease prices
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |