Search

2010 skoda Fabia reviews

skoda Fabia reviews by year of make:   2000  2001  2004  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  Read all reviews

Dave, Lancashire

Skoda Fabia VRS 2010

4 star review

I bought the car recently due to my Impreza turbo coming to the point where I was spending more money on repairs than seemed practical and I had been looking for some time to find a car that was at the right price under 16 grand and still had enough poke to keep me reasonably happy. My requirement was for a New car (to prevent me picking up a thrashed 2nd hand car which is always a possibility with any sports model) that could give over 35 mpg, around 7 secs 0 - 60, 5 door hatch and small enough to park in a tight car park for work . As you can imagine I didn’t have much luck in that department for quite some time until this car came along. The only let down for me was the propect of an auto gearbox with no option for manual. For any person that considers driving a pleasure to experience and not a means from getting one place to the next on any four wheels, the idea of an automatic gearbox is enough to make one shudder. However the test drive made me raise my eyebrows in pleasant surprise. The Automatic box has the option of Drive, Sport mode (both leaving the car to make all the gear shifts) or with a flick of the gear lever to the side enabling you to shift up and down gears by tapping it back or forwards (which makes you feel more involved) or using the paddles behing the steering wheel to change gears which makes the gearbox quite pleasant to use. The drive can make you feel like you are driving a much bigger car than it actually is. Normal driving can feel quite lethargic if left to the auto gearbox’s own devices as it changes gear upwards quite quickly to save fuel. From the lights the initial drive engages as though hesitantly from the start but within no time at all you are rapidly sent forward at pace if you put your foot down, especially when using the steering wheel paddles. Road noise on motorways can be rather intrusive but in my mind this seems to be all from the tyres. I have only covered 200 miles but I am seriously considering buying some new, quieter tyres. Build quality is excellent and the sound system far better than many I have heard. The internal space at the front and rear at the same time is very good and not a significant trade off, one for the other. I have quiet a long body and find that there is plenty of headroom to spare in the car. The feel of the road feels just a little remote in comparison to the Subaru (again I think this could be improved by a better choice of tyres) and adds to the big car feel. The car can come with numerous options including parking sensors, Cruise control and Climate control again adding to the big car feel. But trust me when you find yourself parking in some tight spaces you realise just how easy it is to park. All in all I can say It tick enough of the boxes to having made me buy one and would suggest that this car is certainly worth serious consideration on these pricey petrol driven roads. When you realise that this small engined 1.4 has a Supercharger and Turbocharger fitted and has 180 bhp, 0 - 60 in 7.3 and 139 mph available from under the bonnet in a 5 door hatchback (the estate does 140 mph due to aerodynamics) and all this with only £125 road tax to pay each year (no that really isn’t a typing error!) It really is a pretty incredible car. I should add that I test drove several other cars before I bought this car which included a new Corsa VXR, and one point you need to watch for on any test drive is the real fuel economy, not just trust what the manual says. The Fabia gave over 33 mpg on my spirited test drive whereas the Corsa only gave 22 mpg unspirited local driving and a pretty bad headache too, from its overly hard (for our roads) suspension. I also tested the Suzuki Swift, which although a pretty nice car to drive was gutless at 65mph if you need to overtake. Currently (Nov 10) there is a 12 week waiting list for the Fabia VRS and was the reason I bought the demonstrator car! which probably tells you what a good car this is. One point to note is that this Skoda is the same engine as is used in the VW Polo and Seat Ibiza as all come from the ’Volkswagen Audi Group’ Company. However in basic format the Skoda is a couple of grand cheaper if you dont want the pricey badge or extra unwanted gadgets. I would ask you though not to buy one as I like the exclusivity for the moment.

Submitted: 08/11/2010 21:28:25

Respond to this review | Have your say

Syd Taylor, Staffordshire

Skoda Fabia VRS 2010

4 star review

Skoda VRS When a manufacturer puts one of the most up-to-date and best engines into one of the most cultivated hatchback bodies and when they liberate 180 bhp from just 1.4 litres (Thanks to turbocharging AND supercharging) in a small car weighing just 1318 kgs - and when great pains are taken to ensure that all subservient systems from the cutting edge DSG gearbox to the tuned suspension and XDF electronic diff. perfectly complement the 140mph performance: and when provision is made for the driver to be totally relaxed and in absolute control - you have the very epitome of the performance hatchback. That is what the new £15,700 (£17,360 as tested) Fabia VRS is. So - a lyrical interlude in the early autumnal splendour of Somersetshire was keenly anticipated. And with the need to put the VRS through its paces, I looked forward to open roads, uninhibited twisting bends and the avoidance of all that is stress inducing on British highways today. But first I had to suffer a hundred miles of motorway travel along with fellow ’tester’ and highway expert, Dick Turnip. (This time, without his trusty assistant, Slack Bess). We both concluded that whilst the engine was whisper quiet and creamy smooth, road noise was a touch intrusive at normal cruising speed.(Only to be expected, perhaps, with such a sporty set up and low profile tyres). On the day in question, a spell of Indian summer brought fragrant warmth to the bucolic air. In fact, comfortably ensconced in the little five door Skoda (This is a car perfectly proportioned, unostentatiously compact, yet surprisingly roomy) I confess I reached first of all for the air con control and luxuriated in mans control over the elements. Make no mistake: while this is not a traditional sports car of the ’olde sorte’, its eagerness to get up and go is indicative of its perky prowess and perfectly poised road manners. It has a certain cheekiness reminiscent of fluttering skirts and ’hell-for-leather’ gallops: no suggestion of peat moss here - more a suggestion of the ’Stirling’ kind. Press on; work the wheel; drive through the seven gears (which perform any kind of fandango one might wish - at the behest and control of the gear lever, the steering mounted paddles, the electronic brain or even the pilot) and - with a firm ’seat of the pants’ positivity about the suspension and steering, one feels that it would take an angry family of rhinos to deviate one from ones track. And speaking of rhinos, I can tell you that the horn most definitely works - as I discovered in making a countryman who was oblivious to road safety, jump out of his skin. He quickly slapped on the anchors on his rampant tractor with which he was attempting to construct a chicane-shaped dyke across the main road. I think he might have said ’corr’ and even followed that with a ’blimey’ or two. For those who fear that high performance entails extraordinary guzzling applications, I have to report to you that this is correct - but not in the way you think. Rather than displaying an ’Ice Cold in Alex’ type thirst, it sips daintily of the precious juice - which means that you don’t break out into a sweat every time you pull in for fuel. Skoda claim an overall fuel consumption of 45.6 mpg but I managed to get just about 42mpg. After a spell on country roads as darkness descended I stopped at a hostelry and there in the street light free darkness I caught a glimpse of the planet Jupiter shining brightly. I reflected whimsically that our planet could do with a gas giant or two to supply its energy needs. So - I congratulated myself on choosing a car that hit the spot. Not Jupiter’s red spot, I hasten to add, but that very tender spot in your correspondents wallet. However, where fuel is concerned it is not as economical as the previous, sadly missed, VRS diesel with manual gears (The new model is only available with petrol power and the DSG gearbox), which returned nearly 60 mpg. - so necessary in this mean, peevish, money-grabbing land where a chap is forced to extend his plastic card to the limit when refuelling or buying a bag of chips. For those who imagine superchargers went out with top hats and tails, this little wizard will have you waltzing all the way with a whistle on your lips. And you can tell Matilda it won’t hop like a kangaroo thanks to the uprated suspension and splendid steering. It’s a demon of a car ’point-to-point’ and I must tell you readers (In strictest confidence, of course), that on another occasion back on home turf, I crossed from Shropshire into Wales at supersonic speed. The question is, whether ’tis nobler in the mind to settle for yesterdays manual gears, less fuss and more mpg or else face a techno package that packs more punch and wipes most of the opposition clean. In other words, frills and thrills versus a modicum of sense and sensibility. You pay your money and you take your choice. Make no mistake, I love what’s been done to the VRS but miss what has been left behind. But the manufacturers, no doubt, assuredly feel confident that the opposition is right behind - in the rear view mirror.

Submitted: 28/09/2010 21:09:06

Respond to this review | Have your say

Jake Brigen, Yorkshire

Skoda Fabia 1.6tdi 2010

1 star review

Well, what can I say about this thing? The test drive went great, but after 10,000 miles this car is such a let down; the handling so bad, tyre wear on the edge of the tyre is a prob, 42mpg at best, the dash rattles and it makes the warning lights come on. If you hit a pot hole the dash lights up! Maybe I got a Friday afternoon car? One thing for sure I will not buy another.

Submitted: 12/09/2010 21:30:40

Respond to this review | Have your say

Marilyn Davies, Somerset

Skoda Fabia 2010

5 star review

My son bought a little Skoda Fabia in 2006. It was the absolute basic model 1.2 petrol. I rapidly became quite impressed with it and after riding in it on and off for four years decided to buy my own. As I was retiring I bought a Fabia Elegance model 1.6 CR tdi which meant £35 a year to tax and lots of miles to the gallon. It certainly is everything complimentary that other reviewers have mentioned. I cannot find anything bad to say about it only that I would have preferred the leather in cream not black. It’s now done a thousand miles and I am extremely pleased with it.

Submitted: 09/07/2010 21:42:34

Respond to this review | Have your say

Other people need your help

Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.

Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.

Have your say!

Submit your own review

Lease Buy

* Required

^ Back to Top