nissan Pixo reviews by year of make: 2009 Read all reviews
2009 nissan road test reports and car reviews. Submit your own review of the 2009 nissan, read other driver's opinions or visit the best road test web sites available on the web.
![]()
Bought this car 3 months old with 1000 miles on the clock for £6000 for my wife. I recently sold my Audi A6 and am awaiting delivery of a replacement car in April, as such I have covered about 1500 miles in the last 4 weeks on my normal commute to East London. I expected the worst and am amazed how little I dislike this car! Build Quality: Seems sturdy, deals well with the pot holes on the route in, easily to keep clean and as such is much more dog/kid proof than other cars. Drive Quality - Surprisingly nippy if you work the gears, accelerates to 70mph in 4th and onto 85mph in 5th without any major hassle. I rarely have to move out of the fast lane on the M11 during rush hour. Handling - As you would expect from such a small car it is easy to drive around down and the turning circle is minute, driving on country roads is fun and you feel secure. The only time the car feels like it is working hard is on a roundabout. Amenities - What Amenities? This is the worst point about this car there are several things I just don’t get, even for a cheap car: No glove box; No ability to dim rear view mirror; No ariel as default While it could be contended that the first point is expensive and a choice the second and third items would add perhaps £5 to the cost of the car. Fuel Consumption: I believe the combined cycle is meant to be 68mpg, I achieve about 58mpg, considering my driving style I think this is more than acceptable. Engine/Road Noise: Yes, but it is a 3 cylinder engine so it is to be expected if you work it hard, I’ve never found it hard to talk to a passenger and the CD covers it up if I want to when alone. All in all the car is a lot better than expected for the money and I actually enjoy driving it in every morning, its not the most refined of cars but it performs well, has been totally reliable and is well suited to a run around or commute car due its low running costs and high economy. PS. In my opinion those claiming this car is underpowered are just not changing gears at the right time, for example this car needs to stay in 3rd until at least 45, 4th till at least 65-75 etc, if you change into 5th at 60 it will no doubt take a year to reach a decent speed.
Submitted: 12/03/2010 09:38:58
![]()
Luckily we bought this car on a dealership offer where by we got a grand off the price, plus we argued a further £200 off also. If we’d have paid full price then I would be very upset indeed, as I do not think this Nissan is worth the selling price. We have had endless repeat trips back to the dealerships to have repairs carried out as they seem unable to cope with fixing the car first time. The rearer washer problem is still ongoing for us, and to date we have been back four times - and a fifth time booked for this very week. Have made complaints to head office at Nissan UK but a £20 box of chocolates was all they could respond with. When we collected the car, it had three scratches over dash panels and the radio facias that needed re-work and more re-work and more re-work. So as you can see; our experience of this sweet looking Pixo has been troubled by constant repeated trips to the dealers. We are on the 2nd dealer now as the original Nissan dealership got fed up of us.....so we went to try another. If you are considering buying this car then seriously think about the build quality and the dealership after sales. If anything; insist on a very good deal; ie: money off, discounts, free servicing, free insurance and as much incentives as you can bargain for. Be warned!!!
Submitted: 11/03/2010 10:02:06
![]()
Having read the other reports, I have to speak as I find. For me it was a toss up between the Suzuki Alto and the Nissan Pixo, Nissan won due to a much more stylish and sporty front end and better value. Having decided upon the N-tec model, I actually got a little more for my money i.e. Front fog lights, split rear seat and colour coded wing mirrors and door handles (you have to pay more for the top range model with Suzuki to get these). I was also lucky to get metallic paint a lot cheaper. Now to the important bit; I fell in love with my little car the moment I collected her and drove her away. Yes she’s a little noisy on pulling away, but she’s not short on zip and she’s fun to drive. Petrol consumption is excellent. The small boot isn’t a problem, as even with my 5 year old in a car seat, the split rear seat easily folds down next to her allowing plenty of space for my weekly shop. The interior is more than adequate as is the CD player and it’s all well finished. Mine is a 2010 year of make (this site hasn’t yet update their pull down options). I chose the Shell White Pearlescent paint which looks absolutely stunning and I’ve had many admiring glances and comments. I’ve mostly driven Volkswagens, my last was a Polo, but for the money little sassy and chic little car gives any of the small city cars I’ve owned or tried a good run for their money. So far, no complaints here, hence my 5 star rating. Recommended.
Submitted: 04/03/2010 11:05:26
![]()
I too have had all the same problems, with the back washer, rattle in the front and now the car is only doing 55mpg extra urban, a far cry from the 74.7 quoted. I’m in the process of discussing this with Nissan. DO NOT BUY THIS CAR
Submitted: 27/02/2010 21:27:45
![]()
I’m so upset after reading the reports about the Nissan Pixo by Anne Rouse and Charles Skinner, I thought that perhaps all the problems I had with my Pixo were just rotten luck. Now I realise that I have actually bought a TURKEY of a car :-( I bought mine in August 2009, and it broke down on the motorway in the first three days. For the next six months, it’s broken down whilst in traffic, whilst moving. It’s not started and lost power. I too get the delightful foot shower when I’m trying to wash the back window. There’s a constant rattling, and I can honestly say I’ve never hated such a new & expensive purchase - the worst decision I’ve made. Now, after seeing similar stories, I’m so cross! It’s in for it’s service today, as it was recalled for having a faulty petrol tank - and as I also listed the other problems to them, they didn’t seem surprised. Anyone up for contacting Watchdog with me?
Submitted: 26/02/2010 05:29:41
![]()
I love this nice little new car. I had a micra before, but it was much cheaper to buy a Pixo this time time brand new, a second hand micra was dearer! It goes well with no problems, I do not speed so do not mind, it is an ideal car for what I need in and around town and local country. I would recommend it to any ladies of my age, it is ideal and trustworthy!
Submitted: 19/02/2010 14:30:10
![]()
I bought this car in Aug 2009, traded in Jan 2010. I lost a bucket load of money but was still glad to see back of it. I can honestly say it’s the worst car I have ever owned. Like previous report I also had the same problem with foot shower, sorry rear washer, but the biggest problem I had was a rattle from o/s front after third visit to dealer they replaced an engine mount but this did not solve problem..and after a couple more visits to the dealers and still no joy I had to get rid as they seemed to have the car more often than me. I can also confirm the lack of power, poor fuel consumption and I can compare as my daughter owns a Peugeot 107 that has same engine size but is a lot faster and uses a lot less fuel. I also was really disappionted to find out, after purchase of course, that the car that costs £9000 is built in India that of course is due to low labour costs=poor build quality but 9k is not cheap for such a small car.
Submitted: 17/02/2010 20:24:38
![]()
Hi folks, I leased this car for running around the doors and I can’t stress this enough - DO NOT BUY A PIXO. The fuel comsumption is terrible, I am only getting 60 miles for £10 of fuel; the road noise is so bad you can’t speak to any passengers. Also, if you do decide to buy one, watch out for the rear washer jet pipe as it’s blown off mine 5 times now and soaked my leg. As for motorway driving... I will never go near one again - you need to rev the knackers off it to acheive a wopping speed of 78mph and if you let off the throttle for a second you’re getting passed by trucks. I hope this puts you of a Pixo because honestly, for £8000 there are much better cars out there e.g a 2yr Mercedes A class will cost you this.
Submitted: 20/01/2010 16:17:58
![]()
I haven’t had this very long but decided to write this anyway incase someone is thinking about buying. This is a replacement for an Almera. I love it. It is so easy to drive. I am at the moment finding it hard to stick to the speed limits because it is very nippy and I seem to get to 30mph much quicker than in my Almera. I have taken it on the motorway and felt more confident about overtaking than I did in the Almera. The car was late so the dealer lent me a Micra to tie me over as my tax and M.O.T expired. Overall it did compare to the Micra 1.2 except on the motorway where it was slightly slower to the 50 mph mark. As the manual points out it is a 3 cylinder engine and so it is slightly noisier when moving in 1st gear. It is true that the interior is not "flash", but then again what do you expect for under £9000? I would have thought that not everyone is buying just to save money. Whilst the saving on tax and petrol is appreciated, it is a green car. I might have considered buying the Techna if it included a few extra luxuries that I have got used to driving Nissans for years e.g. volume control from the steering wheel and a better music system. As it is I have got an mp3 cd, air conditioning and remote entry. I am quite tall and there is plenty of room at the front. However, I wouldn’t want to be sitting in the back. There is very little room in the back, especially if the front passengers need to push the seats back to get leg room. For me this isn’t a problem as I rarely have rear seat passengers, but it could be for others. The boot isn’t roomy either. You can put your shopping in it but 2 sets of luggage might be a problem. Again I think Nissan could have added a feature for the rear seats to slide forwards to make more space in the boot on the most expensive model. I would guess that the space issue is no different on competitors’ models because it is meant to be a small car, but I bet that some of the missing features are available on the Yaris for example although you would pay considerably more for these features. This is the main reason I have given a 4 rating.
Submitted: 12/08/2009 09:58:09
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |