24 May 2012
Follow us / Subscribe to newsletter
Consumer reviews by category
Useful information
| Tweet |
nissan Pathfinder reviews by year of make: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Read all reviews
![]()
I ran a Discovery 3 for three years before replacing it with a new Pathfinder 18 months ago and I have regretted it ever since. The Discovery gave me 3 years trouble free motoring and was replaced on cost grounds but the extra money spent would have been worth it. I consider my Pathfinder to have a dangerous fault which the dealers and Nissan refuse to acknowledge because the system has not "logged" it. And in a catch 22 situation if they have no record of a fault they will not investigate it, therefore new faults are not investigated as there is no previous record of them. The fault I have with my Pathfinder is that the auto box changes down into 3rd at specific speeds on declines, the most alarming example being at about 65mph when it suddenly downshifts to 3rd when you feather the throttle or just touch the brake to regulate the speed. The effect is a violently over revving engine and the only way to stop it is to accelerate and get the box to change up, great when you are going down a hill! It won’t do it at 60 or 70 or if the hill is to shallow or steep but basically it is dangerous especially on bends. Nissan will not investigate it. Nissan also say the car should return 23 - 38mpg, average 33 which is why I bought it. Mine does 21 but they say they don’t expect it to do anymore and it is within spec, they have no integrity or customer care and I am counting the days to dropping it. The Sat Nav is also rubbish.
Submitted: 20/09/2010 09:11:43
![]()
Had it about a year now, does everything I want and no problems yet. Only complaint is take a map with you as the Sat Nav does try to lead you astray sometimes! Took out the middle seat as I only needed 6, and this allows kids with longer legs to sit comfortably in the back and get in and out without having to tip the middle seats which have car seats fitted on them. Fuel consumption about 26-27mpg.
Submitted: 30/08/2010 22:03:32
![]()
The car has been great. All through the winter my wife and kids never got stuck or had to stay in once and we live on quite a bad hill. The extra little touches like the wing mirrors adjusting when reversing is great. The rear parking camera is very helpful. And the load bay is very versatile. I have two small complaints. Even for a 4x4 the body roll is quite bad and we also have had a couple of problems with the electrics. The door locks have been playing up (sometimes the intelligent key is dumb) and the driver’s seat has gone all the way back on its own.
Submitted: 28/07/2010 16:15:12
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Allied | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |