10 February 2012
Follow us / Subscribe to newsletter
Consumer reviews by category
Useful information
| Tweet |
Nissan Pixo reviews by year of make: 2006 2009 2010 Read all reviews
![]()
Bring back the Nissa Micra 999cc please! I’m surprised Nissan dare put their name to this trundling bathtub. I trap my fingers regularly in what passes for door pockets, can’t see through the rear window when it rains as the rear wiper only sweeps the left hand side of the window. The rear window ledge issues a mighty thump each time you pass over the tiniest bump. To be quite honest I can’t really give it a star rating as it doesn’t deserve one. I hope number one is the lowest rating - it would be nice if you told us what the numbers signify.
Submitted: 08/07/2011 09:27:22
![]()
I live in Flanders (Belgium) which is mostly flat. Over these roads the car is very nippy. However I took it to the UK on holiday and found that it performed terribly uphill with just myself and one passenger. I too have the rattle which appeared after the petrol tank recall. In wet weather the windows steam up terribly and take ages to clear with the fan. When it snowed here there was more ice on the interior than the exterior. The boot flap/cover is annoying as it keeps falling off or dropping down as I load in my shopping. I had roof bars installed with a so-called ’security lock’. After a couple of days one was gone. On one occasion the steering lock got jammed whilst I was parked. In conclusion the car is great to drive on the flat in dry weather but appalling in hilly conditions and the wet.
Submitted: 12/08/2010 11:09:24
![]()
Bought a 59 plate Pixo from new. Very good on fuel, giving around 55 mpg despite me having a heavy right foot! Common faults include the water leak in the drivers foot well - which was the washer pipe blowing off and the fuel tank sender which were replaced under warranty. Now at 13000 miles a loud road noise has started and Nissan have found a faulty wheel bearing on the front. Garage have been great and are fixing it under warranty but they are doubtful whether they will replace the worn tyre caused by the dodgy wheel bearing. Keep an eye on tread wear on the front tyres as this seems excessive considering the mileage! Overall a good car that represents value for money at a cheap price despite the little quirks... 20 pound road tax for the year is a bonus.
Submitted: 12/08/2010 09:31:11
![]()
Very much as others have said, had about 12 micras, good car, but when I was called Noddy that did it for me. I like the shape, good on fuel, been back to dealers like others, but things seem to be ok now. Got nice suprise on taxing it, twenty pounds for twelve months, can’t be bad. It seems very good using petrol, my service man tells me it’s not got the same build quality as the micra, but if like me you don’t keep them more than three yrs it’s not a problem. The interior trim seems ok, I don’t remember the micras being much better. Nissan seem to have revamped the micra in everything but its shape, but of course, the price has gone up significantly. I think in conclusion remembering that with any new model you are going to get annoying little hiccups, it’s a nice little car, and in no way matches a new skoda I bought some yrs back when the dealer did not want it back. I really felt sorry for the poor sap who eventually bought it.
Submitted: 07/08/2010 21:17:37
![]()
PURCHASED THIS excuse for a car in Sept ’09 and have had all the same probs that have already been posted plus a few more. I have been on to the most unhelpful people at Nissan UK without any joy so I had to trade in and take the big hit but at least I have gone back to what I had before so I know what I am getting. PLEASE DO NOT BUY A PIXO YOU CAN DO A LOT BETTER FOR LESS MONEY (CHECK REVIEWS).
Submitted: 08/06/2010 21:21:00
![]()
Bought Aug 1st 09 on scrappage scheme from a multi-franchise country wide dealership because my Suzuki dealer could not supply a base model. This was really the worst bit of the Pixo experience. Only when I got Nissan Uk involved did the things progress. I chose the base model in berry red (£400 extra paint choice, what a rip off) with no gadgets deliberately as I consider that air con electric mirrors are not essential to economical motoring, just got power steering which I could not avoid. As an old school driver the car was ’run in’ very carefully for 1500 mls. After that I got exactly what I wanted with 4500mls on the clock the performance and fuel economy has improved dramaticaly. Initially it rapidly ran out of steam hill climbing which involved much gear changing and took it a lot of revs to avoid stalling on take off. Now completely transformed . Getting 58 mpg. It’s never been or ever will go near a motorway or very rarely carry rear seat passengers so can not comment about its suitability in those circumstances. Yes I also got a wet foot insufficent addative in the washer bottle let the water freeze at the rear jet blowing off the pipe, easy to fix. Numerous rattles especially on take off were traced to plastic under tray in engine bay been insufficently clipped. Initially I suspected the engine mounting assy but a couple of cable ties cured it. The recall was handled by an independent dealer who did not supply the car. The part was ordered Monday fitted Wednesday with offer of loan car while work was done. I would have liked to change the petrol flap to a key locking system and used the cable to operate the boot lid. My wife and I find it a fun car to drive, easy to park and get in and out of. Good value for the money. From the other comments I suspect a large group of multi-franchised dealerships are the weak link in customer satisfaction.
Submitted: 06/06/2010 20:50:41
![]()
I bought mine as an ex-showroom courtesy car about a month ago with 470 miles on the clock. I payed £6995 and traded in my old Vauxhall for £1000. I have a 100 mile round trip to make at least 3 times a week so fuel economy is important to me. The Pixo doesn’t disappoint, I’m spending around half the amount on petrol per journey compared to my old car. There is only me, my laptop and lunch box to get to work so the question of passanger comfort and boot space isn’t an issue. Had I needed another family car I would have gone for something bigger, as it is this suites me fine. It’s comfortable to drive, performs well enough and I haven’t had any problems with it (although it’s still early days). I think I got a good little car for the money.
Submitted: 26/04/2010 18:28:54
![]()
Like some of the other reviews written I too am very disappointed in the Pixo well saying disappointed that is a laugh. I have had a Micra for last 18 years or so and yes they have had a few minor problems but not compared to the Pixo. Made in India with the Suzuki Alto so which car is it exactly????? Bought this in October 09 new and since then it has been in the garage every month,and they think this is acceptable because it is under WARRANTY, big deal. Like many I have had my feet washed only this was in the cold snap and the car froze up inside due to the amount of water in the carpet, needless to say they blamed the weather looking at the other reviews this is not so. It has had the front windscreen seal replaced, the brakes checked,the dashboard was vibrating that meant whole dash taken out and packed, recalled for the problem with the petrol tank, and best of all yep the RATTLE that no one but the drivers can hear. It is in today for the 3rd rattle test and as Anne’s complaint having the same treatment the mounting. Am I hopeful? NO. Nissan Uk dont want to take responsibility nor do the Dealers so someone has to ME. I have never felt that this has ever been a new car or it even feeling like mine in garage more times than enough. I have part finance on my car and have now taken it up with them to help me out. So come you Guy’s and Girls who are having problems lets get them sorted and contact Watchdog like Priscilla states and try and get something out of this and not just a box of CHOCS. Whose with us on this?
Submitted: 12/04/2010 09:49:14
![]()
Bought this car 3 months old with 1000 miles on the clock for £6000 for my wife. I recently sold my Audi A6 and am awaiting delivery of a replacement car in April, as such I have covered about 1500 miles in the last 4 weeks on my normal commute to East London. I expected the worst and am amazed how little I dislike this car! Build Quality: Seems sturdy, deals well with the pot holes on the route in, easily to keep clean and as such is much more dog/kid proof than other cars. Drive Quality - Surprisingly nippy if you work the gears, accelerates to 70mph in 4th and onto 85mph in 5th without any major hassle. I rarely have to move out of the fast lane on the M11 during rush hour. Handling - As you would expect from such a small car it is easy to drive around down and the turning circle is minute, driving on country roads is fun and you feel secure. The only time the car feels like it is working hard is on a roundabout. Amenities - What Amenities? This is the worst point about this car there are several things I just don’t get, even for a cheap car: No glove box; No ability to dim rear view mirror; No ariel as default While it could be contended that the first point is expensive and a choice the second and third items would add perhaps £5 to the cost of the car. Fuel Consumption: I believe the combined cycle is meant to be 68mpg, I achieve about 58mpg, considering my driving style I think this is more than acceptable. Engine/Road Noise: Yes, but it is a 3 cylinder engine so it is to be expected if you work it hard, I’ve never found it hard to talk to a passenger and the CD covers it up if I want to when alone. All in all the car is a lot better than expected for the money and I actually enjoy driving it in every morning, its not the most refined of cars but it performs well, has been totally reliable and is well suited to a run around or commute car due its low running costs and high economy. PS. In my opinion those claiming this car is underpowered are just not changing gears at the right time, for example this car needs to stay in 3rd until at least 45, 4th till at least 65-75 etc, if you change into 5th at 60 it will no doubt take a year to reach a decent speed.
Submitted: 12/03/2010 09:38:58
![]()
Luckily we bought this car on a dealership offer where by we got a grand off the price, plus we argued a further £200 off also. If we’d have paid full price then I would be very upset indeed, as I do not think this Nissan is worth the selling price. We have had endless repeat trips back to the dealerships to have repairs carried out as they seem unable to cope with fixing the car first time. The rearer washer problem is still ongoing for us, and to date we have been back four times - and a fifth time booked for this very week. Have made complaints to head office at Nissan UK but a £20 box of chocolates was all they could respond with. When we collected the car, it had three scratches over dash panels and the radio facias that needed re-work and more re-work and more re-work. So as you can see; our experience of this sweet looking Pixo has been troubled by constant repeated trips to the dealers. We are on the 2nd dealer now as the original Nissan dealership got fed up of us.....so we went to try another. If you are considering buying this car then seriously think about the build quality and the dealership after sales. If anything; insist on a very good deal; ie: money off, discounts, free servicing, free insurance and as much incentives as you can bargain for. Be warned!!!
Submitted: 11/03/2010 10:02:06
![]()
Having read the other reports, I have to speak as I find. For me it was a toss up between the Suzuki Alto and the Nissan Pixo, Nissan won due to a much more stylish and sporty front end and better value. Having decided upon the N-tec model, I actually got a little more for my money i.e. Front fog lights, split rear seat and colour coded wing mirrors and door handles (you have to pay more for the top range model with Suzuki to get these). I was also lucky to get metallic paint a lot cheaper. Now to the important bit; I fell in love with my little car the moment I collected her and drove her away. Yes she’s a little noisy on pulling away, but she’s not short on zip and she’s fun to drive. Petrol consumption is excellent. The small boot isn’t a problem, as even with my 5 year old in a car seat, the split rear seat easily folds down next to her allowing plenty of space for my weekly shop. The interior is more than adequate as is the CD player and it’s all well finished. Mine is a 2010 year of make (this site hasn’t yet update their pull down options). I chose the Shell White Pearlescent paint which looks absolutely stunning and I’ve had many admiring glances and comments. I’ve mostly driven Volkswagens, my last was a Polo, but for the money little sassy and chic little car gives any of the small city cars I’ve owned or tried a good run for their money. So far, no complaints here, hence my 5 star rating. Recommended.
Submitted: 04/03/2010 11:05:26
![]()
I too have had all the same problems, with the back washer, rattle in the front and now the car is only doing 55mpg extra urban, a far cry from the 74.7 quoted. I’m in the process of discussing this with Nissan. DO NOT BUY THIS CAR
Submitted: 27/02/2010 21:27:45
![]()
I’m so upset after reading the reports about the Nissan Pixo by Anne Rouse and Charles Skinner, I thought that perhaps all the problems I had with my Pixo were just rotten luck. Now I realise that I have actually bought a TURKEY of a car :-( I bought mine in August 2009, and it broke down on the motorway in the first three days. For the next six months, it’s broken down whilst in traffic, whilst moving. It’s not started and lost power. I too get the delightful foot shower when I’m trying to wash the back window. There’s a constant rattling, and I can honestly say I’ve never hated such a new & expensive purchase - the worst decision I’ve made. Now, after seeing similar stories, I’m so cross! It’s in for it’s service today, as it was recalled for having a faulty petrol tank - and as I also listed the other problems to them, they didn’t seem surprised. Anyone up for contacting Watchdog with me?
Submitted: 26/02/2010 05:29:41
![]()
I love this nice little new car. I had a micra before, but it was much cheaper to buy a Pixo this time time brand new, a second hand micra was dearer! It goes well with no problems, I do not speed so do not mind, it is an ideal car for what I need in and around town and local country. I would recommend it to any ladies of my age, it is ideal and trustworthy!
Submitted: 19/02/2010 14:30:10
![]()
I bought this car in Aug 2009, traded in Jan 2010. I lost a bucket load of money but was still glad to see back of it. I can honestly say it’s the worst car I have ever owned. Like previous report I also had the same problem with foot shower, sorry rear washer, but the biggest problem I had was a rattle from o/s front after third visit to dealer they replaced an engine mount but this did not solve problem..and after a couple more visits to the dealers and still no joy I had to get rid as they seemed to have the car more often than me. I can also confirm the lack of power, poor fuel consumption and I can compare as my daughter owns a Peugeot 107 that has same engine size but is a lot faster and uses a lot less fuel. I also was really disappionted to find out, after purchase of course, that the car that costs £9000 is built in India that of course is due to low labour costs=poor build quality but 9k is not cheap for such a small car.
Submitted: 17/02/2010 20:24:38
![]()
Hi folks, I leased this car for running around the doors and I can’t stress this enough - DO NOT BUY A PIXO. The fuel comsumption is terrible, I am only getting 60 miles for £10 of fuel; the road noise is so bad you can’t speak to any passengers. Also, if you do decide to buy one, watch out for the rear washer jet pipe as it’s blown off mine 5 times now and soaked my leg. As for motorway driving... I will never go near one again - you need to rev the knackers off it to acheive a wopping speed of 78mph and if you let off the throttle for a second you’re getting passed by trucks. I hope this puts you of a Pixo because honestly, for £8000 there are much better cars out there e.g a 2yr Mercedes A class will cost you this.
Submitted: 20/01/2010 16:17:58
![]()
I haven’t had this very long but decided to write this anyway incase someone is thinking about buying. This is a replacement for an Almera. I love it. It is so easy to drive. I am at the moment finding it hard to stick to the speed limits because it is very nippy and I seem to get to 30mph much quicker than in my Almera. I have taken it on the motorway and felt more confident about overtaking than I did in the Almera. The car was late so the dealer lent me a Micra to tie me over as my tax and M.O.T expired. Overall it did compare to the Micra 1.2 except on the motorway where it was slightly slower to the 50 mph mark. As the manual points out it is a 3 cylinder engine and so it is slightly noisier when moving in 1st gear. It is true that the interior is not "flash", but then again what do you expect for under £9000? I would have thought that not everyone is buying just to save money. Whilst the saving on tax and petrol is appreciated, it is a green car. I might have considered buying the Techna if it included a few extra luxuries that I have got used to driving Nissans for years e.g. volume control from the steering wheel and a better music system. As it is I have got an mp3 cd, air conditioning and remote entry. I am quite tall and there is plenty of room at the front. However, I wouldn’t want to be sitting in the back. There is very little room in the back, especially if the front passengers need to push the seats back to get leg room. For me this isn’t a problem as I rarely have rear seat passengers, but it could be for others. The boot isn’t roomy either. You can put your shopping in it but 2 sets of luggage might be a problem. Again I think Nissan could have added a feature for the rear seats to slide forwards to make more space in the boot on the most expensive model. I would guess that the space issue is no different on competitors’ models because it is meant to be a small car, but I bet that some of the missing features are available on the Yaris for example although you would pay considerably more for these features. This is the main reason I have given a 4 rating.
Submitted: 12/08/2009 09:58:09
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
Read real opinions: Thousands of consumer reviews on all major car and van models. |
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |