10 February 2012
Follow us / Subscribe to newsletter
Consumer reviews by category
Useful information
| Tweet |
Suzuki Sx4 reviews by year of make: 1996 2006 2007 2008 2009 Read all reviews
![]()
Since my last review 13/1/10 the SX4 now has 20500 miles on it. Have had problems with it stalling in the middle of the road and on restart it won’t go in first gear unless it’s rammed in. This has happend on three occasions so off to Suzuki dealers it went. After waiting 1hr 30 Suzuki told me no fault had been found and rang ’round other garages to find out if any other SX4 had this problem. I want to re-book so they can have the car for longer but no courtesy car available for 3 weeks! Will choose an other dealer, not quite what you except.
Submitted: 13/05/2011 14:01:08
![]()
Had my SX4 from new 58 GL model cannot fault the car. 50+ on a run and 43 round town good overtaking performance, paid £8995 just traded today for the new model moved up to the GLX version SZ4 £7000 after 2 years 3 months for my trade in that is good value.
Submitted: 15/02/2011 22:02:22
![]()
Since Jan 09 this car has covered 11,500 miles and it’s as smooth as ever, as it is comfortable. It gets 209 miles on half tank of petrol and is a quick’ish car for its size. The not so good points are a clunky gearbox, limited vision front as posts to wide, noisey engine on motorway, feels very unstable at 70 /80 although its top speed is 112; it’s only good for a bout 85 mph and finally it cost new £10500 now at 12 months old it is only worth £6000.
Submitted: 13/01/2010 14:31:57
![]()
Autobox is efficient and economical, easy to drive, front A-pillar visibility is poor, folding seat arrangement not as good as a Jazz, this car was my wife’s choice. I would bought the Jazz in spite of the Honda’s bland looks. Having said that my 13 year old Baleno was a very reliable car. Boot space on SX4 is adequate, I have removed seats to increase load volume, but its a palaver to refit, should be reliable but has a lot of electronics to go wrong. Looks stunning in white.
Submitted: 07/11/2008 09:41:31
![]()
Not bad at all... at this price you can’t find a better car. Everyone praises my car, the design is impressive, interiors are not to so great but they are fine too. The car gives better road view driving locally, A/C is quickest to cool down rear passengers. Gets you down on mileage side, it really drinks but the again compared to its size and shape 33 mpg driving locally is ok. The car is quick and smooth. I liked it and will keep it for 2-3 years at least while within warranty.
Submitted: 13/06/2008 16:09:01
Your review will help others decide which vehicle to buy. By spending just a little bit of time filling out a review you can share your experiences with other drivers, giving information only owners will talk about, no marketing spiel, just the real thing. We publish all reviews, whether you rate the vehicle high or low. We are impartial. We are independent. We are committed to 100% real reviews. Please give others the benefit of your advice: give them your review.
Your review will be checked for offensive language within the next few days and then put on RoadTestReports.co.uk and all of our partners websites.
Read real opinions: Thousands of consumer reviews on all major car and van models. |
Aixam-Mega | Alfa Romeo | Aston Martin | Audi | Bentley | BMW | Cadillac | Caterham | Chevrolet | Chrysler | Citroen | Daewoo | Daihatsu | Dodge | Elettrica | Ferrari | Fiat | Ford | Honda | Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Iveco | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Lamborghini | Land Rover | LDV | Lexus | Lotus | Maserati | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz | MG | Micro-Vett | Mini | Mitsubishi | Nissan | Peugeot | Piaggio | Porsche | Proton | Renault | Reva | Roewe | Rolls-Royce | Rover | Saab | Sakura | SEAT | Skoda | Smart | SsangYong | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | TVR | Vauxhall | Volkswagen | Volvo |