2004 MG ZR reviews

MG ZR ZR+ 2.0 TD 113 2004

The biggest load of rubbish I’ve ever owned! If I could this would be getting 0 stars! The day I picked the car up from my old local Rover/MG/ Land Rover dealer (Brand new, 6 Miles on the clock) I had driven 15 Miles, it was a lovely day so I had the sunroof open and the windows open. Went to close the windows and they simply would not go up, then tried to close sunroof and of course it wouldn’t close either!! Brought it back to Rover and it took them 2 days to get it sorted. Then to add insult they were going to charge me for the work they carried out! All was fine until 2005 when she blew the turbo, then later that year once again the electric windows and this time the electric mirrors packed up. Then in 2006 it kept refusing to start, eventually got it fixed (Some faulty sensor). That of course went wrong again in 2009 and 2010. Currently the clutch is about to go and I can’t find a brand new one! Build quality is horiffic! The glovebox came off in my hand after 2 years, still to this day it’s broke. Then the seat dropped to the right which was costly to repair too. The driving position is very uncomfortable, it doesnt handle particualry well either. Honestly, if you are wise you will NOT even consider buying 1 of these! My brothers 1996 Peugeot 306 1.9 XRdt is a better build, more reliable, mechanically sturdy car, and its got 159k on the clock! My MG has 79k on the clock currently. BEST AVOIDED!